13.10.2014 Views

Abstracts - Conference Planning and Management - Iowa State ...

Abstracts - Conference Planning and Management - Iowa State ...

Abstracts - Conference Planning and Management - Iowa State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nonlocal Boundary Layer Method for Overcoming Boundary Condition Ambiguity<br />

in Nonlocal <strong>and</strong> Statistical Models of Quasibrittle Structures<br />

Christian Hoover<br />

Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Technological Institute Suite A123, Evanston, 60208, US<br />

Phone: 1-847-491-4025, Email: ChristianHoover2010@u.northwestern.edu<br />

Jialiang Le<br />

Northwestern University, Evanston, IL<br />

Zdenek P. Bazant<br />

Northwestern University, Evanston, IL<br />

Abstract:<br />

The nonlocal models used in computational analysis for regularization of the boundary value problems<br />

of softening damage are still hampered by unresolved issues in the treatment of boundary conditions.<br />

The existing models are non-physical <strong>and</strong> treat the protrusion of the domain of the nonlocal weighting<br />

function beyond the structure boundary differently. For example, the protruding part is deleted while<br />

the interior part is either rescaled, or enhanced by a Dirac delta peak at the structure boundary or at the<br />

centroid of the domain. The boundary conditions are also unclear for gradient models. Various models<br />

can yield very different results.<br />

A more physical approach to the numerical treatment of the boundaries, inspired by the<br />

weakest-link statistical size effect on structural strength, is proposed. Its modeling requires the structure<br />

(of positive geometry) to be subdivided into elements roughly equal to the representative volume<br />

element (RVE) of material. The RVE is defined as the smallest material volume whose failure causes<br />

the entire structure to fail. In the proposed nonlocal boundary layer model (NBL), the structure is<br />

divided into two parts: an interior domain, <strong>and</strong> a boundary layer of a thickness equal to the RVE size,<br />

which approximately equals the fracture process zone width. In the boundary layer, the stress depends<br />

solely on the average strain over its thickness, which is approximately given by the continuum strain at<br />

the middle surface of the layer. In the interior domain, nonlocal averaging may be applied without<br />

modification because the nonlocal integral domain cannot protrude outside the structure boundary.<br />

Since statistically the structure is equivalent to the weakest link model, its survival probability 1<br />

- Pf is the joint probability of survival of all the RVEs. The subdivision into RVEs is generally nonunique<br />

<strong>and</strong> for irregular geometries, exactly equal RVE sizes are impossible. This gives inconsistent<br />

estimates of failure probability Pf. One way to overcome the problem is to calculate the nonlocal stress<br />

in the joint probability expression by averaging the strains over the zone of influence using a weighting<br />

function. Five different methods of boundary treatment were used for comparing the size effect on<br />

structure strength: 1) calculating Pf based on the weakest-link model, 2) redistributing the protruding<br />

volume by placing it into a Dirac delta function at either the structure boundary or 3) at the center<br />

nonlocal domain, 4) uniformly rescaling the weighting function, 5) <strong>and</strong> the present NBL method. The<br />

last three methods were also used in <strong>and</strong> integral type formulation of deterministic nonlocal softening<br />

damage. These models were compared by simulating the size effect on the modulus of rupture due to<br />

crack initiation, which is a problem experimentally studied by Rocco (1995), <strong>and</strong> the size effect in the<br />

notched specimens of Bazant <strong>and</strong> Pfeiffer (1987). The NBL model <strong>and</strong> the implicit gradient model of<br />

Peerlings et al. were also compared by simulating the size effect tests of Rocco (1995).<br />

373 ABSTRACTS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!