12.10.2014 Views

UBI Banca Group

UBI Banca Group

UBI Banca Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

presented an application for tax assessment by consent after an application for internal review<br />

was not accepted.<br />

TAX ASSESSMENT REPORTS<br />

<strong>UBI</strong> Leasing (2006-2009) increased taxation of €0.41 million<br />

These were allegations relating to the application of a subsidised VAT rate on marine lease<br />

transactions and undue deduction of VAT on invoices for transactions considered non existent by<br />

the tax authorities. For similar allegations relating to prior years the tax authorities have already<br />

issued notices of tax assessment reported above.<br />

Silf (2007) increased taxation of €0.4 million<br />

Allegations concerning irregularities in the deductibility of some expenses during the year (in<br />

particular, those related to commission expenses paid to financial advisors) and of loan losses as<br />

well as the quantification of the recognition of impairment losses on loans for the year.<br />

Observations were presented against the demands in the tax assessment report as permitted by<br />

the taxpayers’ statute (Law No. 212/2000).<br />

<strong>UBI</strong> Leasing (2007-2010) increased taxation of €7.2 million<br />

These were allegations concerning property leasing transactions involving the construction of the<br />

property, considered by the inspectors as irregular sale and lease back transactions. Observations<br />

were presented against the tax assessment report as permitted by the taxpayers’ statute (Law No.<br />

212/2000).<br />

<strong>Banca</strong> Regionale Europea (2008) increased taxation of €0.9 million<br />

These were allegations concerning the tax deduction of the loss resulting from the disposal<br />

without recourse of the loans to a customer in difficulty performed by the bank in 2008. More<br />

specifically, the Piedmont Regional Department of the tax authorities alleged the absence of the<br />

assumptions of certainty and finality of the disposal because of the existence of guarantees<br />

granted to the creditors recognised by the purchaser.<br />

OTHER TAX LITIGATION<br />

Further tax liability litigation exists, relating mainly to years prior to 31 st December 2006 which<br />

regard the matters listed below.<br />

<strong>UBI</strong> <strong>Banca</strong> (1983 and 1984 former <strong>Banca</strong> Popolare Bergamo Scrl) increased taxation of €1.93<br />

million<br />

These consist of cases pending before the Central Tax Commission, concerning appeals against<br />

notices of assessment, mainly regarding the recovery of taxes on expenses deducted fully by the<br />

bank and not proportionately as held by the tax authorities.<br />

<strong>Banca</strong> Regionale Europea (2003) fines of €1.2 million<br />

This is litigation relating to the procedures followed by the bank to adjust its income tax return<br />

originally filed for 2003. The case is currently pending before the Supreme Court of Cassation<br />

brought by the tax authorities against the decision in favour of the bank by the court of first<br />

instance.<br />

Banco di Brescia (2003 and 2004) increased taxation of €0.40 million<br />

This consists of litigation concerning tax collection demands arising from the alleged erroneous<br />

application for the years 2003 and 2004, of the rate for IRAP on the value of production relating to<br />

the Veneto Region. The appeals lodged by Banco di Brescia were recently accepted by the relative<br />

regional tax commission.<br />

337

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!