12.10.2014 Views

UBI Banca Group

UBI Banca Group

UBI Banca Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

year, for 2004 the tax authorities have issued a collection order on a temporary basis, pending a<br />

verdict, for taxes of €22 thousand, which the company paid. In consideration of the circumstance<br />

that several companies participating in the tax consolidation were subject to assessment for the<br />

tax year 2004, a reconciliation agreement was reached with the Regional Tax Commission of<br />

Lombardy for a total settlement of €75 thousand.<br />

<strong>UBI</strong> Leasing (2008) increased taxation of €0.30 million, fines of €0.30 million<br />

A question of alleged mistaken calculation of the tax base for the purposes of land registry and<br />

mortgage duties following end of lease purchase transactions on two finance lease contracts.<br />

<strong>UBI</strong> <strong>Banca</strong> – BDG increased taxation of €1.5 million, fines of €0 million<br />

The recovery of withholding taxes not applied by the subsidiary BDG on dividends paid in various<br />

tax years to the Parent and considered as falling within the parent-subsidiary directives. The<br />

Swiss tax authorities consider that joint stock co-operative companies like <strong>UBI</strong> <strong>Banca</strong> are not<br />

joint stock companies and consequently do not fall within the scope of the directive. In January<br />

2012 the Swiss court rejected the appeal lodged.<br />

Centrobanca (2006) increased taxation of euro €2.73 million and fines of €3.83 million<br />

This regards the criteria employed for the recognition of the disposal of loans to customers or the<br />

recognition of impairment losses on those same loans notwithstanding the tax derivation principle<br />

introduced for IFRS entities in 2005. The conduct of the company is also supported by the<br />

reputable opinions of external advisors. Observations were presented against the demands in the<br />

tax assessment report as permitted by the taxpayers’ statute (Law No. 212/2000). In<br />

consideration of the magnitude of the demands, the inspectors referred the case to the Public<br />

Prosecutor’s Office of Milan, where the hearing is still in progress. On 8 th June 2011, section nine<br />

of the Court of Milan issued a ruling dismissing the case because there was “no case to answer”.<br />

On 20 th July 2011 a notice of tax assessment was received from the tax authorities which took no<br />

account whatsoever of the outcome of the criminal proceedings and confirmed the results of the<br />

tax assessment report. An unsuccessful attempt was made to use compliance by consent<br />

procedures in relation to that notice and therefore court proceedings were initiated.<br />

<strong>Banca</strong> Popolare Commercio e Industria (2006) increased taxation of €1.2 million and fines of<br />

€2.8 million<br />

This regarded allegations concerning the tax treatment for VAT relating to 2006 for commissions<br />

charged to third parties for custody and administration activities performed as a depository bank<br />

for investment funds. This issue is a common one in the banking sector and it arises over the<br />

interpretation at national level of the EU Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 th May 1977.<br />

<strong>Banca</strong> Popolare di Bergamo (2006) increased taxation of €2.78 million and fines of €4.69 million<br />

This regarded allegations concerning the tax treatment for VAT relating to 2006 for commissions<br />

charged to third parties for custody and administration activities performed as a depository bank<br />

for investment funds. This issue is a common one in the banking sector and it arises over the<br />

interpretation at national level of the EU Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 th May 1977.<br />

Banco di Brescia (2006) increased taxation of €1.95 million and fines of €2.92 million<br />

This is a case of alleged irregularities in the quantification of the recognition of impairment losses<br />

on loans for the year. After an unsuccessful attempt to use compliance by consent procedures<br />

court proceedings were commenced against this allegation.<br />

<strong>UBI</strong> <strong>Banca</strong> (2003) increased taxation of €18 million and fines of €25.2 million<br />

This is a case of allegations of undue corporate income tax deductions of expense items in relation<br />

to contributions of operations performed in 2003 which gave rise to the formation of the former<br />

Banche Popolari Unite <strong>Group</strong>. The assessment relates to a year (2003) for which the time limit<br />

expired on 31 st December 2008, while the inspection was performed in 2010. The bank has<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!