10.10.2014 Views

pdf reprint - Physical Oceanography Research Division

pdf reprint - Physical Oceanography Research Division

pdf reprint - Physical Oceanography Research Division

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 99, NO. C1, PAGES 963-979, JANUARY 15, 1994<br />

Surface layer variations observed in multiyear time series<br />

measurements from the western equatorial Pacific<br />

Janet Sprintall and Michael J. McPhaden<br />

NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, Washington<br />

Abstract. Mooring measurements at 0 ø, 165øE, for the period November 1988 to<br />

August 1991 indicate that surface layer structure was characterized by two distinct<br />

climatic regimes associated with dramatic differences in large-scale atmospheric and<br />

oceanic conditions. La Nifia conditions existed from November 1988 to November<br />

1989, during which time the easterly trades were strong, Ekman divergence and<br />

upwelling were pronounced, surface velocity was strongly westward, and rainfall was<br />

low. The surface layer was cold, salty and well mixed down to 100-m depth, with<br />

density variations controlled primarily by temperature. In contrast, from November<br />

1989 to August 1991, the zonal winds were on average westerly and punctuated by<br />

frequent westerly wind bursts, the surface currents reversed and flowed eastward in<br />

the upper 50 m, and rainfall was high. Compared to the La Nifia period, the surface<br />

layer was warmer and fresher, and the density mixed layer was shallower than the<br />

isothermal layer owing to the presence of a 30-m-thick mean halocline (or barrier layer)<br />

between 55- and 85-m depth. Moreover, density variations in the mixed layer were<br />

determined primarily by salinity. During the November 1988 to November 1989 La<br />

Nifia period, variability in sea surface temperature was influenced by local upwelling<br />

and zonal advection. However, during November 1989 to August 1991, the presence of<br />

the barrier layer effectively prevented the entrainment of cooler, saltier water from the<br />

thermocline into the surface layer. Local air-sea heat fluxes were therefore more likely<br />

to be prominent in the surface layer temperature balance. The barrier layer thickness,<br />

which varied with a dominant time scale of 12-25 days, appears to have been affected<br />

by variations in zonal advection of low-salinity water past the mooring.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The world's highest open ocean sea surface temperatures<br />

(SST) are found in the western equatorial Pacific. Deep<br />

atmospheric convection is associated with the "warm pool,"<br />

producing a corresponding maximum in global oceanic rainfall.<br />

The nature of the complex air-sea interactions that<br />

occur in the region because of these features is important for<br />

the understanding and prediction of global climate variability.<br />

This has been a significant focus of attention during the<br />

decade-long Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere (TOGA)<br />

program and in particular of the international TOGA Coupled<br />

Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment undertaken<br />

during 1991-1994 [Webster and Lukas, 1992].<br />

The purpose of this paper is to examine the variability in<br />

surface layer hydrography of the western equatorial Pacific<br />

on daily to interannual time scales for the period November<br />

1988 to August 1991. The emphasis is on moored time series<br />

measurements from 0 ø, 165øE. The mooring is part of the<br />

TOGA observing array and is located in the warm-pool<br />

region.<br />

The upper ocean structure in the western equatorial<br />

Pacific is particularly interesting, as previous observations<br />

have revealed substantial salinity stratification resulting in a<br />

shallower mixed layer occurring within a deeper, nearly<br />

isothermal layer [Lukas and Lindstrom, 1991; Delcroix et<br />

This paper is not subject to U.S. copyfight. Published in 1994 by the<br />

American Geophysical Union.<br />

Paper number 93JC02809.<br />

al., 1992]. This may be a persistent feature of the general<br />

hydrography of the region, as demonstrated in the analysis<br />

of historical hydrographic data by Sprintall and Tomczak<br />

[1992]. The difference between the mixed-layer depth and<br />

the isothermal-layer depth, referred to as the barrier layer,<br />

may be important in limiting communication between the<br />

ocean surface and the thermocline. The generation of shallow<br />

haloclines and associated barrier layers has been attributed<br />

to a localized heavy rainfall in the warm-pool region<br />

[Lukas and Lindstrom, 1991]. Those authors also suggested<br />

that the barrier layer may be maintained in part by the<br />

westward subduction of saltier water from the central Pa-<br />

cific. Conversely, Roemmich et al. [1993] suggest that barrier<br />

layers can be created as fresher surface water from the<br />

west flows eastward over the central Pacific water in an<br />

equatorial surface jet. Numerous authors have speculated<br />

that the presence of the barrier layer in the western equatorial<br />

Pacific may be important for the development of E1<br />

Nifio-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). However, the precise<br />

role of the barrier layer in affecting ocean-atmosphere interactions<br />

over the warm pool has yet to be clearly determined.<br />

The mooring at 0 ø, 165øE, is unique in that it has been<br />

measuring salinity since November 1988. The availability of<br />

the salinity time series data allows us to address the issues<br />

regarding the role of salinity in controlling surface layer<br />

buoyancy and the potential of the salt-stratified barrier layer<br />

in affecting air-sea interaction. We are interested in the<br />

following specific questions related to upper ocean dynamics<br />

and thermodynamics of the warm pool region. (1) What are<br />

963


964 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I<br />

0 ø 165øE<br />

- løS 167øE<br />

• -10<br />

c<br />

o<br />

::•: .<br />

,i<br />

..<br />

' , ,i:_.'! . ::i,ll ,. ! ,<br />

- i<br />

i'<br />

ili¾i? ....<br />

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I<br />

NDJFHRHJJRSONDJFHRHJJRSONDJFHRHJJR<br />

1989 1990 1991<br />

Figure 1. Daily averages of the zonal wind component from the 0 ø, 165øE mooring (solid curve) and<br />

Nauru Island at 0ø32'S, 166ø54'E (dotted curve) for the period November 1988 to August 1991.<br />

the relative importances of temperature and salinity in<br />

determining surface layer density at 0 ø, 165øE? (2) Do the<br />

relative importances of temperature and salinity vary with<br />

time? (3) How do upper ocean temperature and salinity vary<br />

in response to local atmospheric forcing? (4) How prominent/persistent<br />

is the barrier layer at 0 ø, 165øE? In particular,<br />

what is its thickness, time scale, relation to surface forcing,<br />

and effect on SST?<br />

In section 2 we briefly describe the mooring measurements<br />

and additional data set• used in the study. In section 3 we<br />

show that our study period encompassed two distinct climatic<br />

regimes in the western equatorial Pacific. The first<br />

regime (November 1988 to November 1989) coincided with a<br />

La Nifia and was characterized by unusually high Southern<br />

Oscillation Index (SOI) values, cold SSTs, high surface layer<br />

salinities, strong easterly trade winds, and low precipitation<br />

in the western equatorial Pacific. The second regime (November<br />

1989 to August 1991) was characterized by low SOI<br />

values, high SSTs, low surface layer salinities, westerly<br />

surface winds, and high precipitation. The surface layer<br />

hydrography is discussed in section 4, first in regard to the<br />

relationship between temperature and salinity and their<br />

relative control of the surface layer density structure within<br />

the two climatic regimes and second in regard to the time<br />

evolution of the barrier layer. Variability in upper ocean<br />

thermodynamics in response to surface wind forcing and<br />

current fluctuations are analyzed in section 5. We conclude<br />

in section 6 with a general discussion of the air-sea interaction<br />

scenarios which are likely to have existed in the western<br />

equatorial Pacific during the two different climatic regimes.<br />

2. The Data<br />

2.1. The Mooring Data<br />

The primary data used in this study are moored time series<br />

measurements of currents, temperature, salinity, and wind<br />

collected at 0 ø, 165øE for the period November 1988 to<br />

August 1991.<br />

Wind velocity was measured on the surface toroid at a<br />

height of 4 m above mean sea level by a vector averaging<br />

wind recorder (VAWR) and also by an Argos meteorological<br />

platform (AMP). The VAWR recorded vector-averaged<br />

wind components, air temperature, and SST (1-m depth) at<br />

15-min intervals, while the AMP recorded the same parameters<br />

at 2-hour intervals and telemetered them to shore via<br />

the Argos system. Additional wind data were available from<br />

the Nauru Island monitoring station at 0ø32'S, 166ø54'E,<br />

where an R.M. Young model 05103 propeller and vane<br />

anemometer were mounted on a tower 10 m above the<br />

ground. Data were vector averaged for 40 min of each hour,<br />

and three individual hourly samples were transmitted to<br />

shore via the GOES satellite. The zonal wind components<br />

from both the mooring and the Nauru Island station are<br />

shown for the entire record in Figure 1. There is a high<br />

correlation (r = 0.87) between the daily time series of zonal<br />

winds at the two locations for the 1988 to 1991 time period.<br />

Current velocity was measured using E.G.&G. model 610<br />

vector-averaging current meters (VACMs) at 50-m intervals<br />

between a depth of 50 and 300 m. Additionally, an EG&G<br />

model 630 vector measuring current meter (VMCM) recorded<br />

velocity at a 10-m depth. The instruments internally<br />

recorded vector-averaged velocity components at 15-min<br />

intervals (VACMs) and 2-hour intervals (VMCM). The<br />

depths of the current meters are indicated in the zonal<br />

velocity time-depth section of Figure 2. Overall velocity data<br />

return for the period November 1988 to August 1991 was<br />

95%. Data return at individual depths is summarized by<br />

McCarty and McPhaden [1993].<br />

Subsurface temperature was measured by the current<br />

meters and by SeaData temperature recorders (TDR-2s) at<br />

30, 75, 125, 175, and 225 m. Measurements from TDR-2s<br />

were spot samples taken every 30 min rather than the 15-min<br />

averages of the thermistors associated with the VACMs.<br />

In November 1988 the 0 ø, 165øE mooring was instrumented<br />

with Seabird SEACATs (model SBE-16) located at<br />

depths of 11, 51, 101, and 201 m. SEACATs record both<br />

temperature and conductivity and, like the TDR-2s, take<br />

spot samples every 30 min. Salinity data were obtained using<br />

the standard algorithm which is a function of temperature<br />

and conductivity. Additional SEACATs were deployed be-


_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

_<br />

1oo.,•<br />

SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 965<br />

i i i i i i i i i i i i [ i i i i i i i i i i i ! i i i i<br />

3,00 , . , , . , , , , , , . , , , , . , . , .<br />

DJFMAMJ JASONDJFMAM JASONDJFMA'M'J<br />

1989 1990 1991<br />

Pour le D6veloppement en Coop6ration) group based in<br />

Figure 2. Contours of zonal current component in centi- Noumea, New Caledonia. In all cases, only those CTDs<br />

meters per second from the mooring record at 0 ø, 165øE, for taken within 60 min in time and within 5 nautical miles (1 n.<br />

the period November 1988 to August 1991. Data have been mi = 1852 m) of the mooring were included in the calibration<br />

low passed using a 51-day Hanning filter. Contour interval is analysis. Differences between CTD and SEACAT measure-<br />

20 cm s -], with the zero contour enhanced, and shading<br />

ments may be expected because of internal wave variability<br />

indicates westward (negative) flow. Instrument depths are<br />

shown by solid squares on the right axis.<br />

and the spot sampling nature of the SEACAT instrument<br />

ginning November 1989 at 3-, 30-, and 75-m depths and also<br />

beginning May 1991 at 151 m. The 30- and 75-m SEACATs<br />

replaced the SeaData temperature recorders during this<br />

period. Figure 3 shows the time series of temperature and<br />

salinity in the upper 201 m at the 0 ø, 165øE mooring.<br />

Further details of the instrumental accuracies and of<br />

acquisition and processing of the 0 ø, 165øE wind, current,<br />

and temperature data are dealt with by Feng et al. [1991].<br />

The performance of moored SEACATs in the central equatorial<br />

Pacific at 0 ø, 140øW is discussed by McPhaden et al.<br />

[1990]. For our study the accuracy and calibration of the 0 ø,<br />

165øE SEACAT data is evaluated through comparison with<br />

in situ conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) data. Generally,<br />

CTDs are taken at the time of recovery and deployment<br />

of the mooring. In addition, there are also periodic hydrographic<br />

transects along 165øE as part of the U.S.-People's<br />

Republic of China (PRC) bilateral air-sea interaction program<br />

and semiannual SURTROPAC cruises along 165øE by<br />

the ORSTOM (Institut Fran•ais de Recherche, Scientifique<br />

[McPhaden et al., 1990]. We stratified CTD/SEACAT pairs<br />

by time since mooring deployment. For nine pairs that fell in<br />

the 6- to 9-month range (the longest mooring deployments),<br />

the rms difference is 0.023 practical salinity units (psu). This<br />

compares favorably with the manufacturer's specification of<br />

about 0.060 psu over 6 months of deployment and is also<br />

comparable to accuracies determined by McPhaden et al.<br />

[1990] for 1 year of data at 0 ø, 140øW.<br />

30-<br />

28<br />

30-<br />

28-<br />

30-<br />

28-<br />

11m<br />

b<br />

35.1 -<br />

34.5 -<br />

35.1 -<br />

34.5 -<br />

'--' 30-<br />

o<br />

r.._) 9.8-<br />

[,1 30-<br />

CK 28-<br />

ß --) _<br />

CIZ 30-<br />

CK 28-<br />

[,1 _<br />

•- 28-<br />

L,_I 26-<br />

26-<br />

22-<br />

26-<br />

22-<br />

35.1 -<br />

34.5 -<br />

CO -<br />

.--. 35.1 -<br />

>-, 34.5 -<br />

,_, 35.1 -<br />

(]Z 34.5 -<br />

35.1 -<br />

34.5 -<br />

24-<br />

20-<br />

35. I -<br />

34.5 -<br />

151 m<br />

22-<br />

18-<br />

N' IJ ''''''''$' M M J "N' I J '''''"'''"" M M J 5 N I j' •M''''' M J<br />

1989 t 990 t 99 t<br />

35.1 -<br />

34.5 -<br />

201 m<br />

' I''''M''' 'S'N' I'' ''''d'''''<br />

I d'''''''<br />

N J M J J M M $ N M M J<br />

1989 1990 1991<br />

Figure 3. (a) Daily averaged temperature from the SEACAT and SeaData instruments and (b) salinity<br />

from the Seabird SEACAT instruments at the mooring at 0 ø, 165øE, for the period November 1988 to<br />

August 1991. Depths of the SEACAT sensors are indicated.


966 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN' WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

Table 1. Data Returned by SEACAT Instruments<br />

at the 0 ¸, 165øE Mooring<br />

Data Returned, %*<br />

Depth,<br />

m Period of Deployment Terriperature Salinity<br />

3<br />

11<br />

30<br />

51<br />

75<br />

101<br />

151<br />

201<br />

Total<br />

Nov. 18, 1989, to Apr. 8, 1991 79 79<br />

Nov. 15, 1988, to Apr. 8, 1991 96 83<br />

Nov. 18, 1989, to Apr. 8, 1991 100 100<br />

Nov. 15, 1988, to Apr. 8, 1991 100 100<br />

Nov. 18, 1989, to Apr. 8, 1991 79 79<br />

Nov. 15, 1989, to Apr. 8, 1991 100 100<br />

Mar. 29, 1991, to Apr. 8, 1991 100 100<br />

Nov. 15, 1988, to Apr. 8, 1991• 100 100<br />

94 92<br />

*Percentage of daily averaged temperature and conductivity<br />

(salinity) data available.<br />

?SEACAT instrument at 201 m was removed on November<br />

15, 1989, and redeployed on March 29, 1991.<br />

Percentage data return for the temperature and salinity<br />

associated with the depth of each SEACAT sensor is shown<br />

in Table 1. For the most part the time series appear to be<br />

complete; however, data gaps are found in the SEACAT<br />

temperature and salinity records at 3 m for February 17,<br />

1990, to June 30, 1990; at 11 m for May 22, 1990, to June 30,<br />

1990; and at 75 m for November 19, 1990, to March 29, 1991.<br />

A data gap also occurred in the SEACAT salinity record at<br />

11 m for March 28, 1991, to August 4, 1991. For the nearly 3<br />

year record, correlation between daily 3-m (1 l-m) temperature<br />

data and those at 30 m is 0.89 (0.96), and for salinity it<br />

is 0.93 (0.98). The correlation between temperature (salinity)<br />

data at 3 and 11 m is 0.96 (0.98). Hence the data gaps were<br />

filled for the 3-m record by a linear regression formula based<br />

on the 11-m record when available, and when this record was<br />

not available, then by linear regression with the 30-m record.<br />

Similarly, correlation between the daily 75-m record of<br />

temperature (salinity) with data at 51 m was 0.65 (0.90), so<br />

data gaps at 75 m were filled using the resultant linear<br />

regression formula. Gaps due to mooring replacement (generally<br />

of only 1- or 2-day duration) were filled by linear<br />

interpolation in time. In the following, only the calculations<br />

of mixed-layer depth and isothermal depth required the use<br />

of the interpolated time series. The interpolated time series<br />

in this case provided data segments of maximum length and<br />

to a depth sufficient for determination of these parameters.<br />

For this analysis all variables were processed to daily<br />

averages. In the case of density, mixed-layer and isothermallayer<br />

depths, wind speed, wind stress, and wind work,<br />

computations were made using the higher frequency data<br />

before averaging to the daily means.<br />

2.2. Additional Data Sets<br />

Any study involving salinity variability of the surface layer<br />

in the rain-drenched western equatorial Pacific should necessarily<br />

include some estimate of the local precipitation.<br />

Here we will use a pentad (5-day-averaged) oceanic rainfall<br />

estimate at 0 ¸, 165øE, derived from the Global Precipitation<br />

Climatology Project (GPCP) [Arkin and Ardunay, 1989;<br />

Janowiak and Arkin, 1991]. These estimates are based on<br />

infrared measurements of cloud top temperatures from polar<br />

orbiting and geostationary satellites. The method of rainfall<br />

rate estimation is based on a high correlation between<br />

observed rainfall and the fractional coverage of "cold"<br />

cloud tops with effective blackbody temperatures of <br />

15<br />

lO<br />

5<br />

o t"' .... ,.,,,.,,,.,,,/'•"""'-'""""'""V""<br />

'.....<br />

%"'",,,I'•,,,,,' "-' ' --5 •1 it<br />

O JFM FIM J J FI S 0 N O JFM FI M J J FI S 0 N O JF'M FI M J J FI<br />

1989 1990 1991<br />

Figure 4. Time series of pentad GPCP rainfall estimates and evaporation rate. Evaporation rate was<br />

calculated using the formula E = (pacœ/Po)lUIAq with P0 as the mean water density and using mooring<br />

wind spee data, an air-sea specific humidity difference of Aq = 5 g kg -• , an exchange coefficient of cE<br />

-- 1.2 x 10 -3 , and an air density of pa - 1 ß 2 kg m -3


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 967<br />

time series. It is evident that in magnitude, precipitation<br />

generally exceeds evaporation, particularly from November<br />

1989 to August 1991.<br />

CTD data from four U.S.-PRC bilateral cruises and five<br />

French SURTROPAC cruises along the 165øE meridian<br />

collected from November 1988 to August 1991 will be used<br />

to describe the hydrodynamic characteristics and circulation<br />

around the mooring. For the U.S.-PRC cruises, casts were<br />

made every 0.5 ø longitude equatorward of 3øN and 3øS, with<br />

station spacing of about 1 o latitude poleward of 3 ø. The casts<br />

were generally made to at least 1000 dbar and mostly to<br />

within 100-200 m of the ocean bottom. Calibrated data were<br />

processed to a 2-dbar depth interval. For the SURTROPAC<br />

cruises, station spacings were approximately 0.5 ø latitude<br />

between 5øN and 5øS and 1 ø poleward of these latitudes.<br />

Again, most of these casts were made to ---1000 dbar,<br />

although in some cases the equatorial SEACAT calibration<br />

casts were shallower. Calibrated data were processed to a<br />

5-dbar vertical resolution. Further details of the acquisition,<br />

calibration, and processing of these data are found in work<br />

by Lake et al. [1991] for the U.S.-PRC cruises and in work<br />

by Henin et al. [ 1989], Dandonneau et al. [ 1990], du Penhoat<br />

et al. [1990], Delcroix et al. [1991], and Rual et al. [1991] for<br />

the SURTROPAC cruises.<br />

Finally, to characterize the regional-scale wind field variability<br />

in the western Pacific, we utilize the Florida State<br />

University pseudostress analyses [Goldenberg and O'Brien,<br />

1981].<br />

3. Two Climatic States in the Western<br />

Equatorial Pacific<br />

Over the 3-year record of this study, there appear to be<br />

two distinct regimes in the western equatorial Pacific distinguishable<br />

by dramatic differences in both atmospheric and<br />

oceanic conditions.<br />

3.1. November 1988 to November 1989<br />

For the period February 1988 to November 1989, climatic<br />

records show that the SOI of surface pressure distribution in<br />

the tropical Pacific was positive, with the highest values<br />

since late 1975 registered in November 1988 (1.9) [Climate<br />

Analysis Center, 1991]. These high values are indicative of<br />

La Nifia conditions prevailing in the tropical Pacific throughout<br />

much of 1988 and 1989. After November 1988, the SOI<br />

declined, crossing zero around November 1989. Thus the<br />

first year of our time series (November 1988 to November<br />

1989) coincides approximately with La Nifia conditions in<br />

the equatorial Pacific.<br />

The Florida State University zonal wind stress (Figure 5a)<br />

indicates the presence of strong easterly trade winds in the<br />

equatorial Pacific from November 1988 to November 1989.<br />

Averaged over the region shown in Figure 5a, the trades are<br />

O (0.02 N m -2) stronger than the annual climatology given<br />

by $tricherz et al. [1992] in their atlas. Also, easterly winds<br />

at 0 ø, 165øE are 3.1 m s- • stronger than normal compared to<br />

the annual mean mooring climatology of McCarty and<br />

McPhaden [ 1993]. The GPCP precipitation estimates for the<br />

coinciding period (Figure 5a) show that the Pacific equatorial<br />

band east of 160øE received on average lOO.<br />

20ON I ............ ]................<br />

I .............. !............... I ............... !...............<br />

I... I. ............ ! ....<br />

...... '• '*-- "•"""'"'---••'•"•'-•-'••:-<br />

- ------- .,,•ii•i:-•!•:'*-":-":.•i:: :•;•7:i"•- :":.•=:!•i•i•:--':':'/.."x•""'"""""<br />

-"-<br />

- ß: "'•""•"'•:'•:•:- ...,,•,•. :'••:.-:-i•::+.-:• , o •'""••'" ............ *'•'•••• •.-'.-.:i ø-.-': '--'•i!•=.•$•:':. :.:..' :•i•ii<br />

•'"'"""• '•'••!iii!•..-;'."'•<br />

- '-"'•-'<br />

................. - •'<br />

...................... ••.•---.-•'--•:-:.••••••• x:<br />

•0o•-<br />

'•-'"'"'•""'"'"'"•'"'•'•:•::•:'•'•:i;'-;."•::•i•'--"':'•:-•<br />

*•'"'"'••••'••-•i•i:!'i•<br />

."•...........<br />

,............... .5•,••*'/.:•'•.'•..............<br />

i•..:• •oo •<br />

• ........................................................................ • !=<br />

10øS •-%"•..':".•="" • '--- '-•"................................<br />

•'•:'""'"•' '"':':':•'":' '""•• •<br />

100 q•<br />

20øs • i<br />

:•.....................<br />

"¾'<br />

'•'"'•i:"'*•"•**i'•:'"'•'• ............... •?"'"' -'••••. "•':':''•'• •'*•'•"'<br />

• :•4<br />

145øE<br />

155øE 165øE 175øE 175øW 165øW<br />

LONGITUDE<br />

DEC 89 - AUG 91. > lOO.<br />

20ON I I I I I I I I I<br />

:•:. '--•- '-..• "•-•!•'<br />

:_:•:::.-• •iii:: :::'"• i ::i::•if:•'•::i::ii!i:::::-."'•!i::iiiii:::<br />

'-'•:.•;i::::ii::•::':•:•:•!;::i::::!;:•-•::ii::i::i'-::'•<br />

:-'<br />

:•:-•!::ii::iiii!:: :-:-:- ======================================<br />

•<br />

- f•..•..•.•.•*.•.•`••:;•;•:•:•4•;4•.:.•.•.•.•::•:•::?:•F•:•::•f:•..j•::::•;•:..•::•:.:.•:.`•:•:•f.•.•.•:•P•:5:•::•:•.• ß<br />

100N ...........................................<br />

•'""'"'"'"'*'*'•""•'*'*•••••C•**:J:"•::•***:':':•:•*****'"'""*-'<br />

'•'•'"•'"•':':•:••2•*::•yy• 300 •<br />

10øS<br />

o<br />

.. ::efi•...-•---..:-•.•:•:•:5:•:•:•:5:•:•:•:•<br />

lOO •<br />

::,•:;:.. .-*-.: . .• •<br />

20 oS ':•::•'• "•½•{•½:•:•<br />

'•<br />

'• ...........................<br />

i<br />

•<br />

t '• o •<br />

145•E 155•E 165•E 175•E 175•W 165•W<br />

LONGITUDE<br />

Figure 5. Pseudo wind stress (m 2 s -2) from Florida State<br />

University (FSU) climatology and precipitation estimates<br />

from the GPCP climatology for the tropical Pacific, averaged<br />

for the periods (a) November 1988 to November 1989 and (b)<br />

December 1989 to August 1991. Length of the 100 m 2 s -2<br />

vector is shown in the top right corner; contour interval for<br />

shaded rainfall estimates is 100 mm month -• .<br />

composite study of a 109-year analysis period of precipitation<br />

patterns associated with the high index phase of the SOI<br />

[Ropelewski and Halpert, 1989], the equatorial region at<br />

165øE is shown to lie in a rainfall deficit zone. Further to the<br />

west, a high SOI is associated with wetter conditions.<br />

Average meridional CTD sections of temperature, salinity,<br />

and density along 165øE have been constructed between<br />

10øN and 20øS from six cruise transects made between<br />

November 1988 and November 1989 (Figures 6a-6c). The<br />

salinity field (Figure 6a) shows strong meridional gradients<br />

located in the vicinity of the North Equatorial Countercurrent<br />

(NECC) at ---3øN to 5øN and again at 3ø-7øS. North and<br />

south of these respective bands, relatively fresh (•34.6-psu)<br />

water is found, probably in response to the rainfall in the<br />

convergence zones (Figure 5a). The southern hemisphere<br />

subtropical salinity-maximum water, here shown as salinity<br />

of >35 psu, occupies a large volume of the southern latitudes<br />

at depth, surfacing in the equatorial regions (3øN-3øS) between<br />

the fresher water found north and south. On the<br />

surface at the equator, salinity is ---35.3 psu. The meridional<br />

temperature field (Figure 6b) shows only two small patches<br />

of water of >29øC centered at 7øN and 7øS. The meridional<br />

temperature, salinity, and density (Figure 6c) sections illustrate<br />

the upward sloping isolines toward the equator that are<br />

characteristic of Ekman divergence and equatorial upwelling.<br />

The spreading of the equatorial pycnocline and<br />

thermocline between 2øN and 2øS is a consequence of the<br />

geostrophically balanced Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC).<br />

Means of the 0 ø, 165øE mooring data for the period<br />

November 1988 to November 1989 (Figure 7) show an<br />

approximately isothermal (28.1øC) and isohaline (35.3 psu)


968 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

8 Nov 88 - 15 Nov 89<br />

D 5 Dec 89 - 10Aug 91<br />

I , I...I / /. I /<br />

0. E.• L '•, ,'-'-__--¾<br />

1.1[,,• l•,t•,.• •,• 0<br />

100.<br />

100 m<br />

200.<br />

300.<br />

400.<br />

500.<br />

20øS 15øS 10øS 5øS 0 ø 5øN 10øN<br />

200 ua<br />

300 u)<br />

400 a_<br />

I I I I I I I<br />

500<br />

20øS15øS 10øS 5øS 0 ø 5øN 10øN<br />

B<br />

I I I I<br />

lOO<br />

200<br />

300<br />

400<br />

500<br />

20øS 15øS 10øS 5øS 0 ø 5øN 10øN<br />

100 m<br />

200 •a<br />

300 u)<br />

400 a_<br />

500<br />

20øS 15øS 10øS 5øS O" 5øN 10øN<br />

c<br />

! I 1_ I 0 0<br />

^ I - 100 100•<br />

E •'"""'•o• 200 200 •<br />

• - ' 300 300 •<br />

< o _ - - 400 400 •<br />

i i i 500 500<br />

20øS 15øS 100S 5øS 0 ø 5ON 10øN<br />

LATITUDE<br />

20øS 15øS 100S 5øS 0 ø 5ON 10øN<br />

LATITUDE<br />

Figure 6. (a) Salinity, (b) temperature, and (c) density along 165øE calculated from CTD data during<br />

November 1988 to November 1989 and (a) salinity, (b) temperature, and (c) density and during November<br />

1989 to August 1991. For salinity the contour interval is 0.1 psu, with salinities of >35 psu shaded and<br />

those of 29øC shaded. Contour<br />

interval for density is 0.2 kg m -3, with values of


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 969<br />

o<br />

SFIL I N I T¾ TEMPERFITURE S I GMFI-T<br />

I __ I I I I I ,-... I • I<br />

ZONAL<br />

VELOC I T¾<br />

I I I . I I<br />

50<br />

E<br />

-i-<br />

1oo<br />

15o<br />

b_] 200<br />

250<br />

300<br />

3•4<br />

(psu)<br />

I I I<br />

(øC)<br />

•IERN<br />

(kg m -a)<br />

I I I<br />

-50-25 0 25 50<br />

(cm<br />

-I<br />

s )<br />

I I I I I I<br />

50-<br />

• 1oo -<br />

n- 15o -<br />

bJ 200 -<br />

250 -<br />

300<br />

0.1 0.3 0.8 1.2 1.8 •.1 •.4 0•.7<br />

I<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

$TRNDRRD<br />

DEV I RT I ON<br />

Figure 7. Means and standard deviations of salinity, temperature, density, and zonal velocity from the<br />

daily averaged mooring data at 0 ø, 165øE for the periods November 14, 1988, to November 15, 1989, (open<br />

circles) and November 17, 1989, to August 5, 1991 (asterisks). The symbols indicate the depth of each<br />

sensor used in the calculations.<br />

ents found in the NECC region during La Nifia that separate<br />

the fresh water from the salinity-maximum water are now<br />

located just south of the equator between 1 ø and 2øS. Unlike<br />

water during November 1988 to November 1989, no water at<br />

the surface between 5øN and 5øS is more saline than 35.0<br />

psu. Surface salinity at the equator is reduced to 34.5 psu,<br />

and strong vertical salinity gradients occur between 50 and<br />

100 m. In the CTD meridional section of temperature (Figure<br />

6e), the 29øC warm pool spreads from 7øN to 16øS and is well<br />

mixed to a depth of-100 m on the equator. There is no<br />

suggestion of Ekman divergence and upwelling in the shallow<br />

isopycnals near the equator (Figure 6f), which is<br />

consistent with the occurrence of westerly winds in the<br />

western equatorial Pacific during this period.<br />

Zonal wind velocity from Nauru (Figure 1) for November<br />

1989 to August 1991 is 0.4 m s -1 on average, and the record<br />

is frequently punctuated by westerly wind bursts with<br />

speeds of up to nearly 10 m s -1. In response to these<br />

westerlies, the zonal velocity in the surface layer frequently<br />

reverses and becomes eastward (Figure 2). The GPCPderived<br />

rainfall for the period (Figure 5b) estimates that<br />

between 200 and 300 mm of precipitation occurred on<br />

average each month. The SOI was mostly negative (typically<br />

between 0 and -1 for 5-month running means) during<br />

November 1989 to August 1991 [Climate Analysis Center,<br />

1991]. The low SOI-high rainfall relationship is consistent<br />

with that found by Ropelewski and Halpert [1987] for the<br />

equatorial region around 165øE during ENSO events.<br />

For the period November 1989 to August 1991, the mooring<br />

means (Figure 7) show a warm (29.6øC), fresh (34.2-psu)<br />

surface layer that is isothermal and isohaline to different<br />

depths. This discrepancy between the shallower isohaline<br />

and the deeper isothermal layer will be dealt with in more<br />

detail in section 4.2. Compared to the mean temperature<br />

profile of the La Nifia period, the isothermal layer now<br />

appears to be shallower. Once again, most of the temperature<br />

variability occurs in the thermocline region. However,<br />

the maximum standard deviation of 2.4øC is located at 125-m<br />

depth, which is consistent with the shallower isothermal<br />

layer. Salinity, too, shows much greater variability in the<br />

surface layer than during the La Nifia period. A maximum<br />

standard deviation of 0.4 psu occurs at 101 m before falling<br />

to around the same means and the same variabilities at 151<br />

and 201 m as were found in the preceding period. As a result,<br />

most variability in the density profile (0.75 kg m -3) is also<br />

found at 101 m.<br />

Associated with westerly wind forcing, mean eastward<br />

flow is found in the surface layer (for example, 8.6 cm s -• at<br />

10-m depth), below which there is a mean westward counterflow<br />

at 101 m. There does not seem to be much difference<br />

in the strength of the EUC between the two periods (52 cm<br />

s -• at 201 m during this second time period). Most of the<br />

zonal velocity variability is found at the surface (standard<br />

deviations of 34 and 31 cm s -• at 10 and 50 m, respectively),<br />

also likely associated with the occurrence of westerly wind<br />

bursts.


970 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

a l,•-NOV-G8 'co IS-NOV-89<br />

TœMPœRRTURœ V$ $1GHR-T V• $IGMR-T V•<br />

SRL ! N I TY TœHPERRTURE SRL I N I TY BETR RLPHR<br />

øt<br />

t øJT I,' FøJ o,,,,,,, o , ,<br />

I I I ! I I<br />

i i i ! !<br />

75 , i , 75 75 , , 75 75<br />

IOO<br />

i<br />

,<br />

i<br />

, I00<br />

t<br />

, , 100 100<br />

i ! i i I<br />

125 ' ' 125 ' ' 125 ' ' 125 125<br />

I I I<br />

i i i<br />

150 150 ' ' 150 ' ' 150<br />

]i,l!xf '' ,,<br />

I I ! I<br />

175 175 , ' 175 175 175<br />

i<br />

i<br />

2OO 200 ' ' 200 200 200<br />

225. , ' , , . 225 ,' ', 225. , . , . 225. , • •', , .225<br />

-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -I.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -I.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0<br />

XCORR XCORR XCORR REGRESSION SLOPE REGRESSION SLOPE<br />

b 1S-NOV-09 to '•-RUG-91<br />

50<br />

TœMPERRTURE V$<br />

SRLINITY<br />

0 I I I. t<br />

75<br />

i<br />

, ,<br />

•oo<br />

•;-5 , ,<br />

2OO<br />

,<br />

SIGMR-T Ve<br />

TEMPERRTURE<br />

0 I • I ,• m 0<br />

7s /il' ,, F 7s<br />

-i½ ;1', !-<br />

•øøJI,' I ', L •øø J ', I : JL<br />

•=Sll ; I ',<br />

•so-• : I ', I-<br />

-II ; I ', 1-<br />

/ •=s<br />

200<br />

225 , ', , ,' . 225 200<br />

225. , , , .<br />

-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -I.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 -I.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0<br />

XCORR XCORR XCORR<br />

5IGMR-T V.<br />

5RL I N I TY BETR RLPHR<br />

• ', ! ,' •d o ..... ' ' o ,<br />

: I ', I!-<br />

, , 25 25<br />

, , 50 50<br />

75 75<br />

, , 100 : 100<br />

'!<br />

' 125 125<br />

150<br />

200 200<br />

'<br />

225. • , , , , , 225 ,<br />

-6-4-2 0 2 a, 6 -1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 l.O<br />

REGRESSION SLOPE REGRESSION SLOPE<br />

Figure 8. Cross correlation as a function of depth between daily averages of temperature and salinity,<br />

temperature and density, and salinity and density for the periods (a) November 1988 to November 1989<br />

and (b) November 1989 to August 1991. Estimates of/3 (the haline contraction coefficient) and a (the<br />

thermal expansion coefficient) for both time periods are also shown. Open circles indicate depths of the<br />

sensors used in the calculations. Dashed lines are 95% confidence intervals for the null hypothesis in the<br />

cross-correlation plots and expected values of a and/3 in the regression slope plots.<br />

Overall, conditions during December 1989 to August 1991<br />

tended to be ENSO-like in the western equatorial Pacific.<br />

However, ENSO conditions did not prevail during this time<br />

across the entire basin. It was not until September 1991 that<br />

substantial warming in the eastern Pacific began to develop,<br />

marking the onset of the 1991-1993 ENSO [McPhaden,<br />

1993].<br />

4. Surface Layer Hydrography<br />

4.1. The Density Equation<br />

The temperature-salinity relationship during both climatic<br />

regimes is quite variable in the upper 150 m. Cross correlations<br />

between the two variables (Figure 8) are generally<br />

either not significant or not consistent between the two time<br />

periods. Only at 201-m depth is a consistent and significant<br />

relationship manifested between temperature and salinity,<br />

with a cross correlation of about 0.7 over the entire mooring<br />

record.<br />

We will examine the relative importance of temperature<br />

and salinity in the density field by assuming a linearized<br />

equation of state, that is,<br />

P=P0 +/38S+aST+'" (1)<br />

where/3 = 0 p/OS, a = 0 p/O T, and higher-order terms have<br />

been neglected. In the limit where salinity controls the<br />

density field, the cross correlation between/5S and/Sp (= p -<br />

P0) would be close to unity (high salinity • high density).<br />

The slope of the linear regression curve between the two<br />

variables would be the haline contraction coefficient /3.<br />

Conversely, in the limit where temperature controls the<br />

density field, the cross correlation between/ST and/Sp would<br />

be - 1 (low temperature • high density), and the slope of the<br />

regression would be equal to the thermal expansion coefficient<br />

a.<br />

The orthogonal regressions for the detrended and demeaned<br />

daily data of density and salinity and density and<br />

temperature for the period November 1988 to November<br />

1989 are shown as a function of depth in Figure 8a. While<br />

there is significant correlation between density and salinity


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 971<br />

Table 2. Comparison of Mixed-Layer Depth, Isothermal-Layer Depth, and<br />

Barrier Layer Thickness*<br />

Thickness, m<br />

rms<br />

Difference,<br />

m<br />

Period Parameter CTD SEACAT Mean ms<br />

Nov. 15, 1988, to Nov. 15, 1989<br />

Nov. 16, 1989, to Aug. 4, 1991<br />

isothermal layer 111.4 95.4 16.0 18.4<br />

mixed layer 109.1 93.3 15.8 16.8<br />

barrier layer 2.3 2.1 0.2 7.3<br />

isothermal layer 90.1 92.1 -2.0 6.0<br />

mixed layer 54.5 55.0 -0.5 4.5<br />

barrier layer 35.7 37.1 - 1.4 7.2<br />

*Results were calculated from nearly simultaneous CTD casts and data from SEACAT<br />

sensors at 0 ø, 165øE, CTD casts were made within 5 nautical miles and 1 hour of the<br />

SEACAT measurements for November 1988 to November 1989 (five casts) and November<br />

1989 to August 1991 (six casts).<br />

at all sensor depths in the water column, the slope of the<br />

regression line is --•1.5-2.5 at the surface and -5.4 at 201-m<br />

depth. The true value of/3 calculated from mean salinity and<br />

temperature at the corresponding depths is --•0.75. For the<br />

same time period, the correlation of density and temperature<br />

at all depths in the water column (Figure 8a) is close to -1<br />

and highly significant. In addition, the slope of the regression<br />

coincides with the values of a (--• -0.32) calculated again<br />

from the corresponding mean temperature and salinity values.<br />

The conclusion to be drawn from this is that during the<br />

cold La Nifia period, temperature is the controlling factor for<br />

the density structure in the surface layer and in the thermocline<br />

at 0 ø, 165øE.<br />

For the period November 1989 to August 1991, Figure 8b<br />

indicates correlation of density and salinity to be near unity<br />

and highly significant for the upper layer to a depth of 101 m.<br />

The slope of the regression closely follows the estimate of/3<br />

to 75-m depth. On the other hand, correlation of density and<br />

temperature (Figure 8b) is highly significant and near -1 for<br />

depths between 101 and 201 m where the temperature/<br />

density regression slope is similar to the expected value of a.<br />

There is also a similarity of the regression slope and a at the<br />

11- and 30-m depths, but the correlation of temperature and<br />

density at these depths is not significant. Hence for the<br />

period November 1989 to August 1991, salinity is the controlling<br />

factor in the density structure of the upper layer,<br />

while in the thermocline region the density structure is more<br />

strongly influenced by temperature.<br />

4.2. The Barrier Layer<br />

During the period November 1989 to August 1991, a<br />

systematic difference developed between the depth of the<br />

isohaline and the isothermal layer, as is evident in the mean<br />

profiles of temperature and salinity shown in Figure 7. This<br />

implies the presence of a barrier layer whose existence in the<br />

western Pacific warm pool has been demonstrated previously<br />

in several publications mentioned in the introduction.<br />

These studies suggest that the spatial extent of the barrier<br />

layer in the equatorial Pacific may be quite significant.<br />

However, little is known about the temporal persistence of<br />

the barrier layer. By the nature of the high temporal resolution<br />

of the salinity and temperature mooring data used in the<br />

present study, it is possible to determine the temporal scales<br />

of variability of the barrier layer phenomenon.<br />

First, we must address the issue of whether the thickness<br />

of the barrier layer can be accurately defined with the<br />

vertical resolution of the mooring data at 0 ø, 165øE. This is<br />

possible through a comparison of the SEACAT data with the<br />

nearest available CTD casts in time and space. As with the<br />

CTD-SEACAT calibration study outlined in section 2, the<br />

differences in location and sampling of the CTD and<br />

SEACAT data corresponded to generally


--<br />

972 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

I<br />

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I<br />

I<br />

• •o<br />

• 12o<br />

• HLxed La•e• .<br />

I I I I ' I ! I I I I ! I I I I I<br />

D J F H R H J J R S 0 N D J F H R H J J R<br />

1989 1990 1991<br />

I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I<br />

b_• •= 80<br />

n-' r,1<br />

n-' 0<br />

1" '<br />

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I<br />

D J F M R M J J R $ 0 N O J F M R M J J R<br />

1989 1990 1991<br />

Figure 9. Daily averaged values of the mixed-layer depth, isothermal-layer depth, and barrier layer<br />

thickness calculated from the mooring data at 0 ø, 165øE for the period November 1989 to August 1991.<br />

Contours are in meters. Corresponding values calculated from simultaneous CTD profiles are indicated by<br />

diamonds for mixed-layer depth, asterisks for isothermal-layer depth, and crosses for barrier layer<br />

thickness.<br />

Nifia period (November 1988 to November 1989), the statistics<br />

were calculated from simultaneous SEACAT-CTD data<br />

for five different days; for the period November 1989 to<br />

August 1991, the comparisons are based on data from six<br />

different days.<br />

For the La Nifia period, the mean mixed-layer depth<br />

calculated using the CTD profiles is 109.1 m, and for the<br />

corresponding SEACAT data it is 93.3 m, that is, a difference<br />

of 15.8 m. The mean depth of the isothermal layer over<br />

the same time period is 111.4 m for the CTD data and 95.4 m<br />

for the SEACAT data, a difference of 16.0 m. These differences<br />

arise because of relatively poor vertical resolution of<br />

the SEACAT data during November 1988 to November<br />

1989. However, both SEACAT and CTD measurements<br />

indicate a barrier layer thickness (isothermal minus mixedlayer<br />

thickness) of 2.1 and 2.3 m, respectively. These values<br />

are close to the vertical resolution of the CTD data and are<br />

not significant relative to the vertical resolution of the<br />

SEACAT data. Hence it appears that under La Nifia conditions,<br />

strong easterly trade winds and associated upwelling<br />

are not conducive to the maintenance of the barrier layer at<br />

0 ø, 165øE. Indeed, the result is not surprising, as it was<br />

shown in section 4.1 that during November 1988 to November<br />

1989, temperature is the controlling factor of the density<br />

structure (and hence the mixed layer) at the mooring site.<br />

For November 1989 to August 1991, the mean mixed-layer<br />

depth for the CTD profiles is only 54.5 m, and for the<br />

SEACAT data it is 55.0 m, a difference of only 0.5 m. During<br />

the same period, the mean depth of the isothermal layer is<br />

90.1 m for the CTD data and 92.1 m for the SEACAT data,<br />

only a 2-m difference in calculations between the two data<br />

sets. Hence for this time period, the mean thickness of the<br />

barrier layer is 35.6 m using the CTD data and 37.1 m using<br />

the SEACAT data. The CTD-SEACAT rms differences are<br />

only 4.5 m for the mixed-layer depth, 6.0 m for the isothermal<br />

depth, and 7.2 m for the barrier layer thickness. Since<br />

the mean barrier layer thickness during this time period is<br />

much greater than these rms differences, we are assured that<br />

the existence of the barrier layer is not an artifact of the<br />

vertical resolution of the SEACAT data. Hence calculations<br />

of mixed-layer depth and isothermal depth using the<br />

SEACAT data from the ENSO-like period produce a meaningful<br />

measure of the barrier layer thickness.<br />

The time series of mixed-layer depth, isothermal depth,<br />

and the difference between the two (the barrier layer thickness)<br />

calculated using the SEACAT data are shown for<br />

November 1989 to August 1991 in Figure 9. For reference,<br />

the corresponding CTD data for the same period used in the<br />

comparison above are also shown in Figure 9. A scatterplot<br />

(Figure 10) of the mixed-layer depth and isothermal layer<br />

depth during the period succinctly illustrates the persistence<br />

of the barrier layer. The mean mixed-layer depth is 54.5 m,<br />

while the mean depth of the isothermal layer is 84.5 m. The<br />

difference between the two depths (30 m) is the mean<br />

thickness of the barrier layer, which can also be inferred<br />

from mean profiles for November 1989 to August 1991


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 973<br />

160<br />

os<br />

AS<br />

---I- 8t U' VS + w e •-= S(P - E)h -1 (4b)<br />

where OT/Ot (OS/Ot) is the local time rate of change of<br />

temperature (salinity), u is the horizontal velocity, VT (VS)<br />

is the horizontal temperature (salinity) gradient, w e is the<br />

vertical entrainment velocity through the base of the mixed<br />

layer at depth z = -h, AT(AS) is the vertical temperature<br />

(salinity) gradient across the base of the mixed layer, Qo is<br />

surface heat flux, P and E denote precipitation and evaporation<br />

rates, p is a constant water density, and C•, is the heat<br />

capacity of water at constant pressure. In this form, the<br />

conservation equations (4a) and (4b) express the local rate<br />

of change of mixed-layer temperature and salinity (first term)<br />

that result from variations in horizontal advection (second<br />

term), vertical entrainment (third term), and surface fluxes<br />

(fight-hand side). Terms that relate to such processes as<br />

turbulent vertical diffusion through the base of the surface<br />

layer have been neglected in (4a) and (4b), as they cannot<br />

be adequately estimated from our data sets. The entrainment<br />

velocity w e can be expressed as<br />

Figure 10. Scatter diagram of daily averaged isothermal<br />

depth versus daily average mixed-layer depth calculated<br />

from mooring data at 0 ø, 165øE, for November 1989 to<br />

August 1991.<br />

(Figure 7). Standard deviations about the mean are 23.0 m<br />

for the mixed-layer depth, 24.6 m for the isothermal layer,<br />

and 20.9 m for barrier layer thickness.<br />

From the autocorrelations of the detrended and demeaned<br />

daily data, we can determine the integral time scales of the<br />

mixed-layer depth, isothermal layer depth, and barrier layer<br />

thickness. The integral time scale is a measure of the time<br />

required to gain a new degree of freedom in the time series<br />

[Davis, 1976]. It is effectively the same as the decorrelation<br />

scale, which in turn can be thought of as one fourth of the<br />

period of the dominant fluctuations. For the period November<br />

1989 to August 1991, the integral time scales of the<br />

mixed-layer depth, isothermal layer depth, and barrier layer<br />

thickness were 15, 24, and 25 days, respectively. However,<br />

calculation of the integral time scales was sensitive to<br />

whether the large oscillation seen in Figure 9 at the beginning<br />

of the time series (November 1989 to February 1990) was<br />

included. When this part of the record was removed, estimates<br />

of the integral time scale decreased to 14, 17, and 12<br />

days for the mixed-layer depth, isothermal layer depth, and<br />

barrier layer thickness, respectively. Thus, broadly speaking,<br />

the dominant time scales in the time series shown in<br />

Figure 9 range between 12 and 25 days. These scales are<br />

consistent with a wide band of spectral energy at periods<br />

between 10 and 100 days in variance-preserving spectra of<br />

mixed-layer depth, isothermal-layer depth, and barrier layer<br />

thickness. Some of this variability may be related to intraseasonal<br />

wind oscillations associated with 30- to 60-day<br />

Madden and Julian [1972] waves.<br />

5. Evolution of Surface Layer Variability<br />

The heat and salt balances of the surface layer are<br />

OT<br />

AT<br />

--+ ot u. VT + We = Qo(pC•,h) -•<br />

(4a)<br />

Oh<br />

We -- W_h q--- (5)<br />

ot<br />

where W-h is the vertical velocity at the base of the mixed<br />

layer, and Oh/Ot is the change in mixed-layer depth<br />

[McPhaden, 1982].<br />

5.1. Surface Layer Response to Local Atmospheric Forcing<br />

In this section we primarily examine the variations in<br />

surface layer temperature and salinity in response to windforced<br />

changes during the two climatic regimes. In section<br />

5.2, variability due to lateral advection, represented by the<br />

second term in (4), will be examined. McPhaden and Hayes<br />

[1991] have discussed the parametric dependence of the heat<br />

balance equation (4a) on surface wind forcing. In a general<br />

sense the turbulent components of latent and sensible heat<br />

flux are proportional to wind speed, Ekman-related vertical<br />

velocity (W-h) is proportional to zonal pseudostress, and<br />

wind work is related to entrainment mixing. Parallel relationships<br />

between the wind constructs and terms in the surface<br />

layer salt balance (4b) also apply. There can be salinity<br />

variability related to the wind speed with its effect on<br />

evaporation. Similarly, wind stress and wind work can result<br />

in the vertical advection and entrainment of waters of<br />

differing salinity into the surface layer. However, as with the<br />

heat balance, direct wind-related variability is not the only<br />

control on surface layer salinity. The salt balance is also<br />

affected, for example, by precipitation, which can be intense<br />

in the warm-pool region (for example, see Figure 5).<br />

Figure 11 shows the cross correlations of the time rate of<br />

change of temperature 0 T/O t and salinity 0 S/0 t (calculated<br />

using centered differences) with the zonal wind pseudostress<br />

> for November 1988 to November 1989 and November<br />

1989 to August 1991. All the daily data used in the<br />

cross-correlation analysis have been smoothed using an<br />

l 1-day Harming filter. The filter removes periods shorter<br />

than about 5 days and enhances the cross correlations with<br />

the wind field. However, results do not qualitatively change<br />

for calculations based on unsmoothed daily data or daily<br />

data low passed with a 7-day Harming filter. Although not<br />

presented, calculations of cross correlations between sur-


ß<br />

974 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

a<br />

b<br />

d•/dt Vs [UIU'"'<br />

100<br />

150<br />

!<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

! i<br />

200 ' '<br />

250 •'<br />

lOO<br />

-I 0<br />

15-N0V-88 to 14-N0V-89<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

dS/dr Ms lU[U'"'<br />

50 ,<br />

O0 ,<br />

50 ' i I '<br />

O0<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

'<br />

50 •<br />

-1 0 ]<br />

XCOEE<br />

18-NOV-89 to •,-RUG-91<br />

dT/dt Vs ]LIp'"<br />

0 I • I I<br />

150 , ,<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

! i<br />

! i<br />

200 ' '<br />

250<br />

-! 0<br />

XCORR<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

dS/dL Vs ILImU'"'<br />

o ,,<br />

i<br />

I<br />

50 '<br />

i<br />

'<br />

i<br />

-<br />

oo<br />

DO<br />

50<br />

i<br />

I<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

! !<br />

! i<br />

-1 0<br />

i<br />

XCDRR<br />

Figure 11. Cross correlations of time rate of change of<br />

temperature and salinity at 0 ø, 165øE with zonal pseudostress<br />

for the periods (a) November 1988 to November 1989 and<br />

(b) November 1989 to August 1991. All data have been low<br />

passed with an 11-day Hanning filter. Open circles indicate<br />

depths of the instruments used in the calculations. Dashed<br />

lines are 95% confidence intervals for the null hypothesis<br />

(i.e., the correlation of zero).<br />

face layer 0 T/O t and 0 S/0 t with meridional pseudostress<br />

(U U(Y)), wind speed (IU), and a construct related to wind<br />

work (U 3) were also computed. For the correlations with<br />

meridional pseudostress, either the results were not significantly<br />

nonzero at the 95% level of confidence, or, if they<br />

were significant, then the magnitude was much less than for<br />

correlations between OT/Ot, OS/Ot, and zonal pseudostress.<br />

Hence subsequent discussion of pseudostress will focus only<br />

on the zonal component. The statistical relationships between<br />

OT/Ot and OS/Ot on the one hand and wind speed and<br />

wind work on the other hand resembled those between<br />

0 T/O t, OS/O t, and zonal pseudostress shown in Figure 11.<br />

Indeed, the three wind constructs of wind speed, wind work,<br />

and zonal wind pseudostress are highly correlated among<br />

themselves, with correlation values ranging in magnitude<br />

between 0.78 and 0.97. A similarly high correlation between<br />

wind constructs was found by McPhaden and Hayes [1991]<br />

in an earlier study of surface layer variability at 0 ø, 165øE.<br />

Thus distinguishing the effects of turbulent air-sea exchanges,<br />

vertical advection, and entrainment requires fur-<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

ther discussion of how these processes work in the upper<br />

ocean.<br />

During the November 1988 to November 1989 period,<br />

cross correlations of OT/Ot with zonal pseudostress (Figure<br />

11 a) are significantly nonzero at the 95% level of confidence<br />

from the sea surface down to 150-m depth. The sign of these<br />

correlations implies that easterly winds (relative to the<br />

mean) lead to falling surface layer temperature. The deeper<br />

significant correlations to 150 m in the temperature field<br />

indicate that a shoaling thermocline is associated with falling<br />

SST during easterly winds (relative to the mean), while a<br />

deepening thermocline is associated with a warming surface<br />

layer during westerly winds (relative to the mean). This<br />

relationship is consistent with variations in wind-driven<br />

vertical advection and entrainment (which in combination<br />

we refer to as upwelling) producing temperature variability<br />

in the surface layer. We can estimate the magnitude of this<br />

vertical velocity at and below the base of the mixed layer by<br />

assuming a purely vertical advection balance in the thermocline,<br />

that is,<br />

OT OT<br />

--+ w --= 0 (6)<br />

ot oz<br />

For this case, the velocity is then simply the ratio of the time<br />

rate of change of the temperature to the mean vertical<br />

temperature gradient near the base of the isothermal layer.<br />

The variability of OT/Ot at a depth of 125 m just below the<br />

mixed layer is 0.83 x 10-6øC s -1. The product of this and<br />

the magnitude of the cross correlation between 0 T/Ot and<br />

U U (x) (r = 0.23) gives an estimate for OT/Ot due to<br />

wind-driven upwelling of 1.8 x 10-7øC s -1. The average<br />

temperature gradient is determined from the temperature<br />

change (0.87øC) between the base of the mixed layer (100 m)<br />

and just below the mixed layer (125 m). Hence the ratio<br />

_<br />

(-OT/Ot)/(OT/Oz) implies a standard deviation wind-driven<br />

vertical velocity of magnitude 5.2 x 10 -6 m s -1 (0.45 m d -1)<br />

in the upper thermocline for the period November 1988 to<br />

November 1989. This vertical velocity, if representative of<br />

the flow at the base of the mixed layer (W-h), could drive an<br />

entrainment heat flux resulting in in-phase thermocline and<br />

mixed-layer temperature variability.<br />

By substituting (6) into (5) we can obtain an estimate of the<br />

entrainment velocity We. From November 1988 to November<br />

1989, the barrier layer is absent, and there is no difference<br />

between the mixed-layer depth and the isothermal<br />

depth; hence Oh/Ot in (5) is equivalent to the time rate of<br />

change of the isothermal layer depth. The time series of<br />

isothermal layer depth is estimated for November 1988 to<br />

November 1989 using the combined set of SEACAT and<br />

SeaData temperature recorders. The cross correlation be-<br />

tween We and O(SST)/Ot is significant (r = 0.22) at the 95%<br />

confidence level. The sign of the correlation implies that the<br />

sea surface tends to cool during periods of entrainment<br />

(We > 0) and tends to warm when entrainment is shut off<br />

(We < 0). This relationship is consistent with that found<br />

above between O T/Ot and the zonal pseudostress and supports<br />

the importance of Ekman-induced upwelling in cooling<br />

the surface layer during the La Nifia period.<br />

For salinity, OS/Ot at 11 m is negatively correlated with<br />

zonal pseudostress during November 1988 to November<br />

1989 (Figure 1 l a), indicating that for periods of easterly<br />

(westerly) winds relative to the mean, salinity rises (falls).


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 975<br />

This is consistent with variations in surface salinity responding<br />

to variations in vertical advection and entrainment of<br />

high-salinity water from the thermocline as suggested in<br />

Figure 6a. Enhanced evaporation or reduced rainfall, associated<br />

with periods of stronger than normal easterly wind<br />

speeds, probably also contributes to increases in surface<br />

salinity. There is no significant correlation between the zonal<br />

pseudostress and salinity variation below the surface layer.<br />

During the period November 1989 to August 1991, the<br />

cross correlations between OT/Ot and the local zonal pseudostress<br />

(Figure 11 b) again show significant positive correlations<br />

between 100 and 125 m, as during the La Nifia period.<br />

However, now the sign of the significant cross correlations<br />

changes across the base of the isothermal layer. In contrast<br />

to the relationship observed during the La Nifia period, this<br />

implies that easterlies (westerlies) relative to the mean are<br />

associated with rising (falling) surface layer temperatures.<br />

Temperature variations in the thermocline are still likely to<br />

be related to wind-driven vertical advection, but (as discussed<br />

in more detail below) surface layer temperature<br />

variability is probably not the result of simple entrainment of<br />

thermocline water brought close to the surface by Ekmanrelated<br />

vertical advection. As the mean surface wind at the<br />

mooring during this period is to the west, the falling surface<br />

temperatures would therefore be associated with the high<br />

wind speeds of the westerly wind bursts. Surface cooling<br />

may be caused by enhanced latent heat flux associated with<br />

higher wind speeds and/or by decrease in insolation due to<br />

the prevailing cloudiness associated with westerly windrelated<br />

convective events [Nitta and Motoki, 1987]. Conversely,<br />

the relationship between rising surface temperatures<br />

and easterlies (relative to the mean) would correspond<br />

to conditions of light winds, reduced evaporative cooling,<br />

and clearer skies at 0 ø, 165øE.<br />

Cross correlations between 0S/0 t and zonal pseudostress<br />

during the November 1989 to August 1991 period are significantly<br />

nonzero at the 95% confidence level between the sea<br />

surface and 100-m depth. The correlations have the same<br />

sign (negative) as during the La Nifia period and imply that<br />

westerly (easterly) winds relative to the mean are associated<br />

with falling (rising) surface layer salinity. This is consistent<br />

with the enhanced deep convection and precipitation found<br />

during periods of westerly wind bursts [Figure 4; Nitta and<br />

Motoki, 1987; McPhaden and Milburn, 1992]. Ekman pumping<br />

could account for the high correlation at 50-100 m found<br />

between OS/Ot and local zonal pseudostress. Compared to<br />

the La Nifia period, a pronounced mean halocline has<br />

developed between 50 and 100 m where OS/Oz < O. This<br />

halocline, when advected vertically, would produce significant<br />

salinity variations over this depth range. We can again<br />

estimate the magnitude of the wind-driven vertical velocity<br />

near the base of the mixed layer by w_ h = (-OS/Ot)/(O•/<br />

Oz), where OS/Ot is the time rate of change of that part of the<br />

salinity variance correlated with zonal pseudostress (0.11 x<br />

10 -6 psu s-l), and OS/Oz is the mean vertical salinity<br />

gradient (0.01 psu m-I). For the period November 1989 to<br />

August 1991, the standard deviation of vertical velocity is<br />

estimated to be 9.8 x 10 -6 m s -1, or 0.85 m d -•.<br />

As for the La Nifia period, we can again estimate the<br />

entrainment velocity w e through (5) and (6). In this case we<br />

estimated O h/Ot using density rather than temperature because<br />

of the presence of the barrier layer. The cross correlation<br />

between We and 0(SST)/0 t is not significant at the 95%<br />

Table 3. Cross Correlations of Mixed-Layer Depth,<br />

Isothermal-Layer Depth, and Barrier Layer<br />

Thickness with SST, Wind Speed (IUI), Zonal<br />

Pseudostress (IUl(X)), Wind Work (IUI 3) and<br />

GPCP Rainfall Estimates<br />

Variable<br />

Correlation<br />

Mixed-Layer Isothermal Barrier Layer<br />

Depth Layer Depth Thickness<br />

SST -0.36* (2) -0.60* (1) -0.31 (x)<br />

Zonal pseudostress 0.47* (-3) 0.61' (-4) 0.14 (x)<br />

Wind work 0.49* (-2) 0.55* (-3) 0.06 (x)<br />

Wind speed 0.48* (-2) 0.54* (-3) 0.07 (x)<br />

GPCP rainfall 0.27* (-5) 0.36* (-5) 0.10 (x)<br />

All data have been low pass smoothed with an l 1-day<br />

Hanning filter (except for the correlations with GPCP rainfall,<br />

which are 5-day estimates) and are for the period<br />

November 1989 to August 1991. Maximum correlation occurred<br />

at lags in days shown in parentheses. Positive lags<br />

mean that column variables (e.g., mixed-layer depth) lead<br />

row variables (e.g., zonal pseudostress); an x indicates that<br />

no lag was identified because the cross correlation was not<br />

significant at the 95% level of confidence.<br />

*Significantly different from zero at 95% confidence level.<br />

confidence level. This suggests that from November 1989 to<br />

August 1991, vertical advection and entrainment were not<br />

responsible for cooling the sea surface. In contrast to the La<br />

Nifia period, the barrier layer is preventing Ekman-related<br />

entrainment of the cooler thermocline water from reaching<br />

the mixed layer. Similar results were found during the<br />

1986-1987 ENSO by McPhaden and Hayes [1991], who<br />

suggested that entrainment may not have been effective in<br />

the heat balance owing to the presence of a barrier layer<br />

limiting communication between the surface layer and the<br />

deeper thermocline region. However, McPhaden and Hayes<br />

[1991] had no salinity measurements to verify this hypothesis.<br />

We further explore the variability in mixed-layer depth,<br />

isothermal-layer depth, and the barrier layer thickness by<br />

computing cross correlations with SST, GPCP pentad rainfall<br />

estimates, and various wind constructs for November<br />

1989 to August 1991 (Table 3). Both SST and the wind<br />

constructs of zonal pseudostress, wind work, and wind<br />

speed are significantly correlated with changes in the mixedlayer<br />

depth and the isothermal-layer depth. The signs and<br />

lags of the correlations indicate that westerly (easterly)<br />

winds are followed 3-4 days later by a relatively deep<br />

(shallow) mixed-layer depth and isothermal depth. This is<br />

consistent with zonal wind-driven Ekman convergence leading<br />

to changes in the depth of these layers. Ignoring zonal<br />

variations for simplicity, mass continuity would imply that<br />

Oh/Ot - H(Ov/Oy), where the meridional Ekman flow (v)<br />

over the mean mixed-layer depth (H) would be in phase with<br />

the zonal wind stress. Thus it is expected that variations in<br />

zonal pseudostress would lead those in mixed-layer depth,<br />

and the results presented in Table 3 are consistent with this<br />

relationship. In this context we view the high cross correlation<br />

that exists between wind work and wind speed on the<br />

one hand and mixed-layer depth and isothermal-layer depth


976 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

on the other hand as not physically significant. Rather, we<br />

interpret these high cross correlations as an artifact of the<br />

high correlation between these wind constructs and zonal<br />

pseudostress.<br />

None of the cross correlations between the wind con-<br />

structs and the barrier layer were significantly nonzero at the<br />

95% confidence level. Of particular note in this regard is the<br />

lack of significant correlation between wind work and barrier<br />

layer thickness. This lack of correlation implies that there is<br />

no erosion and no entrainment across the barrier layer in<br />

response to the westerly wind burst forcing during this<br />

period. The result is consistent with the vertical structure of<br />

the correlation between temperature and zonal pseudostress<br />

(Figure 11 b), which changed sign at the mean depth of the<br />

barrier layer (50-80 m), and also the lack of correlation<br />

between We and O(SST)/Ot for this time period, implying an<br />

isolation of processes controlling temperature in the mixed<br />

layer and the thermocline.<br />

The mixed-layer depth and isothermal-layer depth are also<br />

significantly correlated with GPCP rainfall estimates. The<br />

sign of the correlation suggests that a deep mixed-layer is<br />

associated with high rainfall 5 days (1 pentad) earlier. This is<br />

not a relationship one would expect if buoyancy flux associated<br />

with the rainfall controlled the mixed-layer depth. It is<br />

more likely that wind-driven dynamics rather than buoyancy<br />

flux associated with rainfall determines the mixed-layer<br />

depth variability on the dominant time scales (10-25 days) of<br />

our data set and that, coincidentally, westerly (easterly)<br />

winds are correlated with high (low) rainfall rates. Indeed,<br />

we found that zonal wind pseudostress and GPCP rainfall<br />

estimates were significantly cross correlated for November<br />

1989 to August 1991, with a coefficient of 0.45.<br />

5.2. Lateral Advection<br />

Results in the previous section suggest that onedimensional<br />

vertical processes are likely to affect variations<br />

in the hydrography of the surface layer at 0 ø, 165øE. We<br />

examined the potential impact of various mechanisms using<br />

physical reasoning guided by correlation analysis. However,<br />

the significantly nonzero correlations we found between<br />

surface layer water mass properties, wind constructs, and<br />

GPCP rainfall estimates were generally in the range of<br />

0.2--0.6. Thus not all the observed variability in surface layer<br />

temperature and salinity can be accounted for by local windor<br />

rain-related vertical fluxes. This leads us to consider the<br />

possible role of lateral advection in the surface layer temperature<br />

and salinity balance. In this section we explore the<br />

advective balance obtained in (4) by equating the first two<br />

terms on the left-hand side of the equation. We then use<br />

correlation analysis to look for significant relationships between<br />

velocity components and changes in temperature and<br />

salinity (Figure 12).<br />

For the period November 1988 to November 1989, the<br />

zonal current is significantly correlated with O T/Ot at the<br />

95% confidence level between 11 and 101 m. The sign of the<br />

correlation implies that eastward (westward) velocity relative<br />

to the mean would lead to rising (falling) temperatures in<br />

the surface layer. An estimate of the time-averaged zonal<br />

temperature gradient can be obtained from the slope of the<br />

regression of O T/Ot against zonal velocity. For the La Nifia<br />

time period, at 11 m, this is -0.81 x 10-6øC m -1, implying<br />

a temperature gradient of 0.9øC for every 10 ø longitude from<br />

east to west. This gradient is comparable to the SST gradient<br />

that existed across the equatorial Pacific during this period<br />

when the highest temperatures of the warm pool were<br />

located further to the west of the mooring [Climate Analysis<br />

Center, 1991].<br />

For salinity during this period, meridional velocity is<br />

usually better correlated with OS/Ot than with zonal velocity,<br />

particularly at depths of 11, 101, and 201 m (Figure 12). The<br />

positive correlation suggests that salinity increases (decreases)<br />

with northward (southward) flow. The slope of the<br />

regression of OS/Ot against meridional velocity implies a<br />

meridional salinity gradient of-0.53 x 10 -6 psu m -1 at 11<br />

m, -0.28 x 10 -6 psu m -1 at 101 m, and -0.7 x 10 -6 psu<br />

m -• at 201 m. These gradients correspond to salinity decreases<br />

per 1 ø latitude of 0.5, 0.3, and 0.7 psu at 11,101, and<br />

201 m, respectively. The meridional salinity section that<br />

coincides with this period (Figure 6a) illustrates the presence<br />

of a salinity front near the equator; the magnitude and<br />

sign of the salinity gradient associated with this front are in<br />

general agreement with the values inferred from crosscorrelation<br />

analyses of the moored time series data.<br />

During the period November 1989 to August 1991, the<br />

cross correlation between O T/Ot and the local zonal current<br />

again show significant correlations at the 95% confidence<br />

level in the surface layer at 11 and 51 m. However, at these<br />

depths the sign of the correlation is negative, implying that<br />

westward (eastward) current is associated with rising (falling)<br />

temperatures. During this time period the slope of the<br />

regression between O T/Ot and the zonal velocity component<br />

at 11 m is 0.21 x 10-6øC m -1 implying a temperature<br />

gradient with an increase of 0.2øC for every 10 ø longitude<br />

from west to east. The maps of SST for the period show that<br />

there are times when the warmest temperatures are located<br />

to the east of the mooring [Climate Analysis Center, 1991];<br />

however, for the period as a whole, there is no significant<br />

gradient in the zonal temperature field at the surface. This<br />

lack of a strong mean zonal temperature gradient across 0 ø,<br />

165øE implies that zonal advection is probably negligible<br />

during this period. The observed correlation between O T/Ot<br />

and zonal velocity in the surface layer probably reflects a<br />

coincident strong correlation between enhanced eastward<br />

flow during periods of westerlies and a falling surface layer<br />

temperature due to local wind-related air-sea heat exchange.<br />

During the period November 1989 to August 1991, the<br />

salinity is more significantly correlated with the zonal velocity<br />

component than with the meridional velocity component.<br />

The negative correlations of OS/Ot with zonal velocity in the<br />

surface layer at 11 and 51 m imply that eastward (westward)<br />

current is associated with falling (rising) salinities. At 11 m<br />

the slope of the regression between O S/Ot and the zonal<br />

velocity component is 0.31 x 10 -6 psu m -1 implying a<br />

salinity gradient with an increase of 0.3 psu for every 10 ø<br />

longitude from west to east. This is comparable to the<br />

eastward increase of 0.2 psu for every 10 ø longitude found in<br />

SURTROPAC sea surface salinities for the overlapping<br />

period of data availability between November 1989 and July<br />

1990.<br />

6. Discussion and Conclusions<br />

Using the 0 ø, 165øE mooring data for temperature, salinity,<br />

currents, and winds, we have examined the processes that<br />

influence the surface layer hydrography in the western<br />

equatorial Pacific warm-pool region. For the approximate


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN' WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 977<br />

a 15-NOV-88 to l•-NOV-89<br />

Current<br />

Current<br />

; ' J ;]1', l<br />

•ø1 ',1;/" !- •ø-I ',•; r<br />

/ ',1 •/ / / :1•; /<br />

,001 il/ I ,oo-I : If,,' t-<br />

! I<br />

! I<br />

! I<br />

i i i i<br />

150 , , 150<br />

i !<br />

i<br />

! i<br />

' '<br />

200 200 ' '<br />

50<br />

de/dr<br />

Ve Zonot<br />

Current<br />

O0<br />

!<br />

, ,<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

I<br />

I<br />

!<br />

I<br />

I<br />

! i<br />

i !<br />

50<br />

i<br />

,<br />

!<br />

,<br />

co<br />

! i<br />

i<br />

0<br />

.'oo<br />

dS/dr<br />

Ve NerLdtonot<br />

Current<br />

• ,<br />

!<br />

I<br />

':<br />

250. , , , . 250<br />

-1 o I -1 o I<br />

XCORR<br />

XCORR<br />

50. , __ , .<br />

-I 0 !<br />

XCORR<br />

!SO. , __ ! .<br />

-! 0 1<br />

XCORR<br />

b<br />

18-NOV-89 to 4-RUG-91<br />

O.<br />

dT/dt<br />

,.ol<br />

20O<br />

250. , •,<br />

-! 0<br />

Ve ZonoL<br />

Current<br />

i<br />

,,<br />

XCORR<br />

dT/dt, V. MerLdtonoL<br />

Current,<br />

o<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I !<br />

50 , ,<br />

O0 , ,<br />

so<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

! !<br />

150.<br />

-I 0<br />

XCORR<br />

o<br />

d$/dt,<br />

Ve ZonoL<br />

Current<br />

50 , ,<br />

!<br />

!<br />

!<br />

!<br />

i<br />

oo<br />

/ ;ll', /<br />

J :11', L<br />

Søl :'l : r<br />

!<br />

!00 ' '<br />

!50<br />

-! 0 I<br />

XCORR<br />

i<br />

dS/dr<br />

50 , ,<br />

i<br />

O0 ,<br />

Ve NertdLonoL<br />

Current<br />

i<br />

i<br />

,,<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i !<br />

/ :1\',<br />

•o• ,' I•',<br />

i<br />

O0 •,•!<br />

,,<br />

'50<br />

-] 0<br />

XCORR<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

i<br />

Figure 12. Cross correlations of time rate of change of temperature and salinity at 0 ø, 165øE, with the<br />

zonal and meridional current components for the periods (a) November 1988 to November 1989 and (b)<br />

November 1989 to August 1991. All data have been low passed with an 11-day Hanning filter. Open circles<br />

indicate depths of the instruments used in the calculations. Dashed lines are 95% confidence intervals for<br />

the null hypothesis (i.e., true correlation of zero).<br />

3-year record (November 1988 to August 1991), two climatic<br />

regimes are evident in both atmospheric and oceanic conditions.<br />

During the period November 1988 to November 1989, La<br />

Nifia conditions existed in the equatorial Pacific. The Southern<br />

Oscillation Index was high, unusually strong easterlies<br />

were evident across the basin, and the equatorial cold tongue<br />

penetrated into the western Pacific. Along 165øE, strong<br />

easterlies were associated with equatorial divergence and<br />

upwelling, a strong westward SEC, and unusually low rainfall<br />

rates (< 100 mm month -1) near the equator. The mixed<br />

layer at 0 ø, 165øE was relatively dense, cold, and salty and<br />

penetrated to 100-m depth. Under the La Nifia conditions of<br />

strong easterly trade winds and associated upwelling, no<br />

barrier layer was observed in either the mooring record or<br />

simultaneous CTD casts. Density variations in both the<br />

mixed layer and the thermocline during this period were<br />

controlled by temperature rather than salinity.<br />

For the period November 1989 to August 1991, equatorial<br />

winds at and to the west of 165øE were on average westerly<br />

and punctuated by frequent westerly wind bursts. Rainfall<br />

increased to 200-300 mm month -1, and near-surface zonal<br />

velocity reversed, flowing eastward on average at 0 ø, 165øE<br />

in the upper 50 m. The mooring record shows a shallower<br />

thermocline and a warmer, fresher surface layer. During this<br />

period the mixed layer was shallower than the isothermal<br />

layer owing to the presence of a 30-m-thick barrier layer.<br />

The standard deviation of barrier layer thickness was 20.9 m<br />

with dominant time scales of 12-25 days. As during the La<br />

Nifia period, density variations in the thermocline were<br />

controlled by temperature; in contrast, however, density<br />

variations in the mixed layer during November 1989 to<br />

August 1991 were controlled by salinity.<br />

With the limited data set available, we attempted to gain<br />

some insight into the processes that might account for the<br />

observed variability in surface layer temperature and salinity<br />

within these two climatic regimes. Our basic strategy was to<br />

use correlation analysis supported by physical reasoning.<br />

The analyses are necessarily incomplete and inferential;<br />

nonetheless, they provide some unique perspectives in the<br />

differences between the two climatic states for which mean<br />

conditions and variability are markedly different.<br />

During the La Nifia period of November 1988 to November<br />

1989, variability in the SST and sea surface salinity was<br />

influenced by local Ekman-induced upwelling and horizontal<br />

advection. We estimated a vertical velocity standard devia-


978 SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS<br />

tion of 5.2 x 10-6 m s- • in the upper thermocline associated<br />

with zonal wind pseudostress forcing during this period. A<br />

shoaling thermocline was correlated with decreasing SST<br />

and rising surface salinity. Surface layer temperature appears<br />

also to have been affected by zonal advection in the<br />

cold tongue, and surface layer salinity appears to have been<br />

affected by meridional advection of a salinity front situated<br />

just north of the equator.<br />

During November 1989 to August 1991 the presence of the<br />

barrier layer effectively limited communication between the<br />

surface layer and the deeper thermocline region. While<br />

wind-induced Ekman pumping affected temperature and<br />

salinity variations in the thermocline, the barrier layer prevented<br />

entrainment of this cooler and saltier water into the<br />

surface layer. Air-sea heat and freshwater fluxes were therefore<br />

likely to play a more prominent role in determining the<br />

surface layer hydrography. Surface cooling, for example,<br />

was likely related to enhanced latent heat flux associated<br />

with high westerly wind speeds that existed during this<br />

period and to diminished insolation owing to the increased<br />

cloudiness associated with the westerly wind-related deep<br />

convection. Though we have no radiation data available to<br />

substantiate the hypothesized role of insolation, we note that<br />

our cloudiness-related GPCP rainfall estimates were positively<br />

correlated with zonal winds; that is, cloudiness was<br />

greater during episodes of westerlies. The weak horizontal<br />

SST gradients that existed in the vicinity of 0 ø, 165øE during<br />

this period imply a secondary role for horizontal temperature<br />

advection.<br />

During November 1989 to August 1991, westerly (easterly)<br />

winds relative to the mean were associated with falling<br />

(rising) surface layer salinity. This relationship may have<br />

been in part the result of enhanced precipitation during wind<br />

burst-related convective events. We also found that east-<br />

ward flow was associated with advection of low-salinity<br />

water past the 165øE mooring in the upper 50 m. Zonal<br />

advection may have led to variations in barrier layer thickness<br />

in the manner discussed by Roemmich et al. [1993].<br />

They noted the presence of an eastward freshwater jet<br />

overriding relatively salty water, resulting in the presence of<br />

a barrier layer along 170øW during the 1991-1992 ENSO. The<br />

vertical shear within this jet, acting on a zonal salinity<br />

gradient, tilts the isohalines to the east to produce a vertical<br />

salinity gradient in an isothermal surface layer. The hypothesized<br />

process would operate on about 10-day time scales<br />

and may be responsible for some of the observed variations<br />

in barrier layer thickness. Eastward flow in the upper 50 m,<br />

for example, would lead to lower surface layer salinity,<br />

steepening the vertical salinity gradient across the mean<br />

halocline located at depths between 50 and 80 m. However,<br />

in contrast to the findings of a study by Roemmich et al.<br />

[ 1993] in which zonal current variations were driven by zonal<br />

salinity gradients in the mixed layer, observed zonal currents<br />

at 0 ø, 165øE are predominantly wind driven.<br />

While we have demonstrated the existence of a barrier<br />

layer during the period November 1989 to August 1991 at 0 ø,<br />

165øE, we have not specifically addressed why a barrier<br />

exists during this part of the moored time series record but<br />

not during the part of the record coincident with La Nifia<br />

conditions. Nor have we attempted to define the role (if any)<br />

of the barrier layer in the transition between the two different<br />

climate regimes identified in this study. Our discussion of<br />

mechanisms has concentrated on variations within rather<br />

than between the two climatic states observed in the data.<br />

However, we have been able to provide insight as to the<br />

barrier layer' s influence in affecting ocean-atmosphere interaction<br />

over the warm-pool region. Our analysis emphasizes<br />

the reason for the term "barrier" with regard to the prevention<br />

of water properties being transferred vertically through<br />

mixing and entrainment. The barrier layer effectively decouples<br />

the surface layer from the deeper water and also isolates<br />

the physical processes that occur within each of these<br />

regions.<br />

Acknowledgments. We would like to thank Paul Freitag of<br />

NOAA's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory for assistance<br />

with processing and analyzing the moored time series data. We are<br />

also grateful to Jim O'Brien of Florida State University for providing<br />

pseudostress data; to Thierry Delcroix of ORSTOM, Noum6a, for<br />

providing shipboard salinity data; and to John Janowiak of NOAA's<br />

Climate Analysis Center for providing GPCP pentad rainfall estimates.<br />

We would also like to acknowledge the very constructive<br />

comments of two reviewers, Eric Lindstrom of the U.S. WOCE<br />

Interagency Office, Washington, D.C., and Stuart Godfrey of<br />

CSIRO, Hobart, Australia. Support for one of us (J.S.) was provided<br />

by the National <strong>Research</strong> Council postdoctoral program.<br />

Production of this manuscript was made possible by grants from<br />

NOAA's U.S. TOGA project office and the Equatorial Pacific Ocean<br />

Climate Studies program from NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental<br />

Laboratory contribution 1449.<br />

References<br />

Arkin, P. A., and P. E. Ardunay, Estimating climatic-scale precipitation<br />

from space: A review, J. Clim., 2, 1229-1238, 1989.<br />

Climate Analysis Center, Near real time analysis, August 1991,<br />

Clim. Diagnostics Bull., 63 pp., Natl. Oceanic and Atmos. Admin.,<br />

U.S. Dept. of Commer., Washington, D.C., 1991.<br />

Dandonneau, Y., J. Grelet, F. Masia, and P. Waigna, Rapport de la<br />

campagne SURTROPAC 12 h bard du N.O. Le Suroft, 131 pp.,<br />

Institut Franqais de Recherche Scientifique Pour le Developpement<br />

en Coop6ration (ORSTOM), Noum6a, New Caledonia,<br />

1990.<br />

Davis, R. E., Predictability of sea surface temperature and sea level<br />

pressure anomalies over the north Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr.,<br />

6, 249-266, 1976.<br />

Delcroix, T., F. Gallois, F. Masia, and P. Waigna, Rapport de la<br />

campagne SURTROPAC 14 h bord du N.O. Le Noroit, 117 pp.,<br />

Institut Franqais de Recherche Scientifique Pour le Developpement<br />

en Coop6ration (ORSTOM), Noum6a, New Caledonia,<br />

1991.<br />

Delcroix, T., G. Eldin, M.-H. Radenac, J. Toole, and E. Firing,<br />

Variation of the western equatorial Pacific Ocean, 1986-1988, J.<br />

Geophys. Res., 97, 5423-5445, 1992.<br />

du Penhoat, Y., F. Gallois, M.-J. Langlad, G. Reverdin, and H.<br />

Walico, Rapport de la campagne SURTROPAC 13 h bord du N.O.<br />

Le Suroft, 167 pp., Institut Franqais de Recherche Scientifique<br />

Pour le Developpement en Coop6ration (ORSTOM), Noum6a,<br />

New Caledonia, 1990.<br />

Feng, Y., H. P. Freitag, M. J. McPhaden, and A. J. Shepherd,<br />

Wind, current and temperature data at 0 ø, 165øE: January 1986 to<br />

March 1991, NOAA Data Rep., ERL PMEL-36, 54 pp., Natl.<br />

Oceanic and Atmos. Admin., Boulder, Colo., 1991.<br />

Goldenberg, S. B., and J. J. O'Brien, Time and space variability of<br />

tropical Pacific wind stress, Mon. Weather Rev., 109, 1190-1207.<br />

H6nin, C., B. Camusat, F. Gallois, and P. Waigna, Rapport de la<br />

campagne SURTROPAC 11 du N.O. Coriolis, 161 pp., Institut<br />

Franqais de Recherche Scientifique Pour le Developpement en<br />

Coop6ration (ORSTOM), Noum6a, New Caledonia, 1989.<br />

Janowiak, J. E., and P. A. Arkin, Rainfall variations in the tropics<br />

during 1986-1989 as estimated from observations of cloud top<br />

temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 96, suppl., 3359-3374, 1991.<br />

Lake, B. J., K. Yang, Z. Luizhi, R. C. Millard, S. Pu, J. M. Toole,<br />

Z. Wang, and L. J. Mangum, Hydrographic observations from the<br />

US/PRC Cooperative Program in the western equatorial Pacific


SPRINTALL AND MCPHADEN: WESTERN EQUATORIAL PACIFIC SURFACE LAYER VARIATIONS 979<br />

Ocean: Cruises 5-8, Tech. Rep. WHOI-91-19, Woods Hole<br />

Oceanogr. Inst., Woods Hole, Mass., 1991.<br />

Levitus, S., Climatological atlas of the world ocean, NOAA Prof.<br />

Pap., 13, 173 pp., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, D.C.,<br />

1982.<br />

Lukas, R., and E. Lindstrom, The mixed layer of the western<br />

equatorial Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 96, suppl., 3343-3357,<br />

1991.<br />

Madden, R. A., and P. Julian, Description of global scale circulation<br />

cells in the tropics with a 40-50 day period, J. Atmos. Sci., 29,<br />

1109-1123, 1972.<br />

McCarty, M., and M. J. McPhaden, Mean seasonal cycles and<br />

interannual variations at 0 ø, 165øE during 1986-1992, NOAA Tech.<br />

Memo., ERL PMEL-98, 64 pp., Natl. Oceanic and Atmos. Admin.,<br />

Boulder, Colo., 1993.<br />

McPhaden, M. J., Variability in the central equatorial Indian Ocean,<br />

II, Oceanic heat and turbulent energy balances, J. Mar. Res., 40,<br />

403-419, 1982.<br />

McPhaden, M. J., TOGA-TAO and the 1991-92 E1 Ni•o/Southern<br />

Oscillation event, <strong>Oceanography</strong>, 6, 36-44, 1993.<br />

McPhaden, M. J., and S. P. Hayes, On the variability of winds, sea<br />

surface temperature, and surface heat content in the western<br />

equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 96, suppl., 3331-3342, 1991.<br />

McPhaden, M. J., and H. B. Milburn, Moored precipitation measurements<br />

for TOGA, Trop. Ocean-Global Atmos. Notes 7, pp.<br />

1-5, Nova Univ., Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 1992.<br />

McPhaden, M. J., H. P. Freitag, and A. J. Shepherd, Moored<br />

salinity time series measurements at 0 ø, 140øW, J. Atmos. Oceanic<br />

Technol., 7, 568-575, 1990.<br />

McPhaden, M. J., F. Bahr, Y. du Penhoat, E. Firing, S. P. Hayes,<br />

P. P. Niiler, P. L. Richardson, and J. M. Toole, The response of<br />

the western equatorial Pacific Ocean to westerly wind bursts<br />

during November 1989 to January 1990, J. Geophys. Res., 97,<br />

14,289-14,303, 1992.<br />

Nitta, T., and T. Motoki, Abrupt enhancement of convective<br />

activity and low-level westerly burst during the onset phase of the<br />

1986-87 E1 Nifio, J. Meteorol. $oc. Jpn., 65,497-506, 1987.<br />

Roemmich, D., M. Morris, W. R. Yot•g, and J. R.q)onguy,, Fresh<br />

equatorial jets, J. Phys. Oceanogr., in press, 1993.<br />

Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, Global and regional scale<br />

precipitation associated with E1 Nifio/Southern Oscillation, Mon.<br />

Weather Rev., 115, 1606-1626, 1987.<br />

Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, Precipitation patterns associated<br />

with the high index phase of the Southern Oscillation, J.<br />

Clim., 2, 268-284, 1989.<br />

Rual, P., J. Grelet, M.-J. Langlade, H. Walico, and S. Bonnet,<br />

Rapport de la campagne SUTROPAC 15 •t bord du N.O. Le<br />

Noroit, 134 pp., Institut Franqais de Recherche Scientifique Pour<br />

le Developpement en Coop6ration (ORSTOM), Noum6a, New<br />

Caledonia, 1991.<br />

Sprintall, J., and M. Tomczak, Evidence of the barrier layer in the<br />

surface layer of the tropics, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7305-7316,<br />

1992.<br />

Stricherz, J. N., J. J. O'Brien, and D. M. Legler, Atlas of Florida<br />

State University tropical Pacific winds for TOGA, 1966-1985,<br />

technical report, 261 pp., Mesoscale Air-Sea Interaction Group,<br />

Fla. State Univ., Tallahassee, 1992.<br />

Webster, P. J., and R. Lukas, TOGA COARE: The Coupled<br />

Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment, Bull. Am. Meteorol.<br />

$oc., 73(9), 1377-1416, 1992.<br />

M. J. McPhaden and J. Sprintall, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental<br />

Laboratory, 7600 Sand Point Way, N.E., Seattle, WA 98115.<br />

(Received March 29, 1993; revised September 20, 1993;<br />

accepted September 24, 1993.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!