The Housing Selection Scheme Consultation Paper - Northern ...
The Housing Selection Scheme Consultation Paper - Northern ...
The Housing Selection Scheme Consultation Paper - Northern ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
sex will be expected to share up to 16 years (currently 18 years), while persons<br />
of 16 years and above will be determined to require a bedroom of their own<br />
(currently 18 years). This proposed change will mean that while younger children<br />
of different sex will be expected to share a bedroom for longer, until age 10, on<br />
the other hand, it will be more generous for older children who will be assessed<br />
as requiring their own bedroom from age 16.<br />
This change is viewed as essential to re-align the allocations policy with the<br />
<strong>Housing</strong> Benefit regulations and ensure in so far as reasonably practical that new<br />
allocations make best use of housing stock and do not result in underoccupation.<br />
<strong>Consultation</strong> Question 1<br />
Do you agree with the recommendation that the Age Criteria for Children sharing<br />
bedrooms should be amended as outlined in line with the proposed amendments<br />
to <strong>Housing</strong> Benefit Regulations?<br />
(B) Allocations of Difficult-to-Let Properties<br />
Under the current rules of the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Selection</strong> <strong>Scheme</strong>, allocations resulting in<br />
under-occupation are on occasion made where there are good housing<br />
management grounds to applicants with smaller households, often single<br />
persons, in areas where housing need has been met or where a particular<br />
property has been identified as difficult to let in order to prevent or minimise<br />
voids.<br />
Our Proposal: It is proposed to retain this flexibility to enable participating<br />
landlords to make allocations in such circumstances. Working age tenants on<br />
housing benefit in these circumstances will be advised before they accept the<br />
offer that they will need to consider how they would meet any potential shortfall in<br />
rent as a result of the potential <strong>Housing</strong> Benefit restriction.<br />
<strong>Consultation</strong> Question 2<br />
Do you agree with the proposal to retain flexibility to make allocations to<br />
applicants who do not meet the minimum bedroom requirements for difficult-to-let<br />
areas or properties?<br />
(C) Parents with Access to Children who do not Permanently Reside with<br />
them<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> Executive recognises the need for a parent(s) to have an additional<br />
bedroom to facilitate access arrangements to children who do not permanently<br />
reside with them and currently calculates minimum bedroom requirements and<br />
makes allocations on this basis. However, the proposed <strong>Housing</strong> Benefit size<br />
restriction does not recognise this need and from April 2013 such a bedroom will<br />
Proposals for Changes to the <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Selection</strong> <strong>Scheme</strong> 9