Report - City of Tustin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Swiontek Ryan To Subject Hutter Edmelynne RE Resident comment in support of Cedar Grove cellsite From Hutter Edmelynne Sent Friday October 29 2010 20 PM To Swiontek Ryan Subject Resident comment in support of Cedar Grove cellsite Hi Ryan FYI and FY use Jeff Tansley live on Arbolada called to express his support ofthe cellsite on Cedar Grove Park It s on City property Will improve service in Tustin It s part of having better service so residents should just deal with it In general towers don t look that bad His points were Edmelynne V Hutter Associate Planner City of Tustin 30o Centennial Way Tustin CA yz78o T 7457374 F74 573i3 ehutter ex tustinca or flease consider the environment before Erintinf thisemail
Swiontek Ryan From Sent To Cc Subject Cathy Bardenstein cjbardyC mac com Monday October 25 2010932 PM Swiontek Ryan Jeffrey D Scherzer Letter in support ofTMobile Cell Site at Cedar Grove Park Dear Mr Swiontek My husband and I live at 10908 Dishman Place in Tustin CA We just came home from vacation and found a note in our mailbox seeking our help in opposing the proposed TMobile Site Instead it spurred us to write a letter in support of this site because we are thrilled to know we will finally get cell coverage in our home We would appreciate it if you would submit it to the Planning Commission as part of the record We also note that there potentially will be AT antennas on the site as well We since we both own 3G ipads and have no service here except via wifi are looking forward to that For your information my husband and I are both attorneys for many years as a paramedic responding to emergency calls My husband has also worked The letter that was circulated makes several points about the danger of cell towers These points are without basis in fact and because of ignorance the proponents are doing nothing more than fear mongering Point 1 Our children and grown ups will be subjected to cell tower radiation at school and at home THE FACT I5 we are talking about radio frequencies not radiation as that is commonly understood The same radio frequencies that have been used in televisions for years and in the baby monitors many of use next to our babies cribs There has been to the extensive study about this issue and the government has found no evidence of danger public but has issued safety guidelines that limit power levels to far less than what could possibly cause any harm to anyone baby or adult Because of the results of those studies the Federal Government has felt it appropriate to preclude local governments from even considering health and safety of cell sites Opponents of cell towers will point to some studies especially from Europe which conclude that there may be some risk to people from exposure to cell towers Those results have not been duplicated and have not been peer reviewed and are therefore not credible Point 2 Home Buyers will be afraid to buy our homes Studies up to 10 in value show homes near towers drop THE FACT I5 there are no such studies that come to this conclusion just anecdotal statements from owners or realtors no appraisers however stating that this is so We do know for a fact that some appraisals on the east coast which looked at the impact of cell towers on property values SHOWED NO IMPACT There are certainly some people who like us look at coverage maps as a consideration in where to rent or buy a home All this is is fear mongering arising out of Point 1 and is nothing more than a typical NIMBY reaction to anything new People will notice a new tower but after a while it blends into the background This one blends in pretty well according to the picture The only people who are going to know it is there is those who will look for it because of the urgent notice that was distributed 1
Page 1 and 2: ITEM 6 Report to the Planning Commi
Page 3 and 4: I r l DR09 033 December 14 2010 Pag
Page 5 and 6: l I i J I i I DR09 033 December 14
Page 7 and 8: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 7 Ex
Page 9 and 10: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 9 sa
Page 11 and 12: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 11 C
Page 13 and 14: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 13 C
Page 15 and 16: ATTACHMENTA Location Map
Page 17 and 18: ATTACHMENT B Land Use Fact Sheet
Page 19 and 20: ATTACHMENT C Submitted Plans
Page 21 and 22: Site Selection The proposed siteTMo
Page 23 and 24: Exhibit 1 Alternate locations map f
Page 25 and 26: 0 z W v o N w v c 1 R NN j t a Mr a
Page 27 and 28: I I I I W I o r J o Z W Q W e w y I
Page 29 and 30: f i j t i r l r I f I I i l a 3 I j
Page 31 and 32: I t 9 i I i a O to f E1e F c y us 1
Page 33 and 34: M j i i i i I I I i i i t 1 i I i i
Page 35 and 36: cw I I I J i i N ijy I I 5 1 S F I
Page 37 and 38: t r i J i i r i I E W g b N O Q r t
Page 39 and 40: O O Le O Q L Q N V 1 L 3 gin e 0 H
Page 41 and 42: N i N LL V Q N H G i w
Page 43 and 44: Ms Monica Moretta August 11 2010 Pa
Page 45 and 46: Dear Mr Swiontek October 20 2010 Th
Page 47: Letters of Support
Page 51 and 52: Swiontek Ryan From Sent To Subject
Page 53 and 54: Letters of Opposition
Page 55 and 56: Petition to Protect Cedar Grove Par
Page 57 and 58: Petition to Protect Cedar Grove Par
Page 59 and 60: Swiontek Ryan From Jennifer Wierks
Page 61 and 62: Cell Towers continuously emit RF EM
Page 63 and 64: Tustin CA 92782 715 573 9938 skomoC
Page 65 and 66: 2 Playground equipment and picnic a
Page 67 and 68: F 4 the costly and imported eucalyp
Page 69 and 70: 6 5 The City Retains Power to Deny
Page 71 and 72: J inATWireless PCS v Ciry Council o
Page 73 and 74: Page X10 Thus residents are justifi
Page 75 and 76: Page l2 Ona local level residents a
Page 77 and 78: Pa X14 Good and Excellent Copies of
Page 79 and 80: Pgc l6 will create anxiety stress w
Page 81 and 82: Exhibit 1 Petition to Protect Cedar
Page 83 and 84: Number Name Email Comments Address
Page 85 and 86: 98 Mitch King kingimC yahoo com 99
Page 87 and 88: 194 MARGARET BURNETT Completely NOT
Page 89 and 90: 284 Junia Martinson 285 Ann Lew 266
Page 91 and 92: 363 Al 8eerdsen 364 Tanya Zaverl No
Page 93 and 94: 422 jacklyn huang stop the tower 42
Page 95 and 96: Number Name Email Comments Your Zip
Page 98 and 99:
Panned Out View Data Coverage is Re
Page 100 and 101:
ATTACHMENT E Information Pertaining
Page 102 and 103:
The City also maintains control ave
Page 104 and 105:
in keeping with the majority of the
Page 106 and 107:
Htunan Exposure To Radio Frequency
Page 108 and 109:
WHQ Electromagnetic fields anti pub
Page 110 and 111:
112010 WHO Electromagnetic fields a
Page 112 and 113:
112010 WI 10 Electromagnetic fields
Page 114 and 115:
RESOLUTION NO 4163 A RESOLUTION OF
Page 116 and 117:
Resolution No 4163 DR09 033 Page 3
Page 118 and 119:
Resolution No4163 DR09 033 Page 5 C
Page 120 and 121:
Exhibit A Resolution No 4163 Page 2
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Municode Page 1 of2 PART 6 DESIGN R
Page 128 and 129:
RESOLUTION NO 01 95 A RESOLUTION OF
Page 130 and 131:
Resolution No01 95 Page 3 G That it
Page 132 and 133:
EXHIBIT A DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ABO
Page 134 and 135:
Exhibit A of Resolution No01 95 Pag
Page 136 and 137:
Exhibit A of Resolution No 01 95 Pa
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Exhibit A of Resolution No 01 95 Pa
show all

Report - City of Tustin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?