09.10.2014 Views

Report - City of Tustin

Report - City of Tustin

Report - City of Tustin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dear Mr Swiontek<br />

October 20 2010<br />

Thank you for your time this morning to discuss the Cedar GroveCell Tower Project<br />

under consideration by the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Tustin</strong> As discussed I would suggest the applicant<br />

and <strong>City</strong> consider engaging in the following items<br />

1 Document radiation emissions at specified distances in comparison to other<br />

typical household equipment such as microwaves orbaby monitors<br />

2 Discuss why placement <strong>of</strong>tower is needed at Cedar Grove Park rather than<br />

co locating within existing Orange County Fire Authority OCFA<br />

communications tower It is my understanding there is remaining co location<br />

capacity in the OCFA tower for additional service providers<br />

3 Discuss status <strong>of</strong>preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><strong>Tustin</strong> Wireless Master Plan and<br />

technical reasons for determining optimal locations <strong>of</strong> cell towers Explain<br />

issues relative to<br />

topography signal strength wireless demand etc<br />

4 Document height <strong>of</strong> existing trees at Cedar Grove Park and discuss the<br />

difference betweentleproposed tower and the adjacent trees<br />

5 Document the proximity <strong>of</strong>the proposed cell tower to nearby homes and<br />

school buildings Based on quick Google Aerial review homes appear to be<br />

approximately 600 feet away from the proposed tower location<br />

a 1 home in <strong>Tustin</strong> Ranch Estates within 300<br />

b 1 home in <strong>Tustin</strong> Ranch Estates within400<br />

c 1<br />

home in <strong>Tustin</strong> Ranch Estates within 500 and<br />

d Remaining homes in the Serrano neighborhood 600 feet away<br />

6 Discuss the revenue expected from licensing <strong>of</strong>the cell tower which will be<br />

contributed to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tustin</strong> General Fund<br />

7 Consider conditioning the proposed project to construct a pedestriantrail<br />

linking the existing paved Class Imulti usetrail to internal sidewalk within<br />

Cedar Grove Park near gated pedestrian access to Peters Canyon Elementary<br />

Residents repeatedly have removed cross beams from fencing along Class I<br />

trail to accessCedar Grove Park since no direct access is provided between<br />

ClassItrail and Cedar Grove Park If proposed project constructs anADA<br />

compliant linkage concurrent with the cell tower construction the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Tustin</strong> can reimburse the applicant partially or fully based on<br />

negotiations<br />

See the attached graphic illustrating the recommended concept<br />

Request the applicant discuss ordinances employed by other jurisdictions to<br />

help address resident concerns about environmental impacts caused by cell<br />

towers For example in 2007 the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong>Mission Viejo considered an<br />

ordinance restricting cell towers at any <strong>City</strong> park or open spaces orrestricted<br />

cell towers from within300 feet <strong>of</strong>residential property and school district<br />

property when the anteimas are pointing towards those sensitive land uses<br />

9 Discuss health concerns related to the 1996 Telecommunications Act<br />

Thank you for your help with this maiter and I hope the items discussed above are<br />

constructive and beneficial for the <strong>City</strong><br />

Paul Martin<br />

11 O1 S Hiskey Lane <strong>Tustin</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!