Report - City of Tustin
Report - City of Tustin Report - City of Tustin
in a quick signal loss even in close proximity bigger effect when closer to the antennas to the cell site Any obstruction has a At the same time the proposed height will allowco location of future carriers offering a functional antenna location iuinintizing the number ofcell sites needed for other carriers in the area Alternate location Analysis The table below shows RF Engilieering comments in regards to the alternate locations and the reasons why they won t work for the coverage needs in the referenced area Also refer to the attached exhibits at the end of this document Exhibit 1 shows a map with alternate locations Exhibit 2 shows a drive test map which consist of real time collected data Table 1 e f I Handy Creek 1 1 Monopole 33 777399 I I 1 117 75531 Monopole 1 1 Existing TMobile s cell site at this location 2 OC Emergency Facility s ground elevation Communications 33 764972 117 Tower 3 Verizon ROW 33 750518 117 76636 Street Light 74635 Lattice Tower won twork for a cell site 1300 ft Very low site street light with no collocation option tityfIrvine Jurisdic tiano Location ii approved will not work for the intended coverage Mono tree objective of this ring That 4Vista Towers 33 747584 117 76588 OCFA Project proposed location may work better 5 Cedar Grove Park 7520833 117 76976 Mono Tree forTMobile s toll road coverage and new residential area east of the toll road Current design proposal cedar will provide excellent coverage at Jamboree Rd and Tustin Rd intersection 3
Exhibit 1 Alternate locations map fi st i9t LAO 5U Zt Le t e1n 1 HANDY CREEK MONOPOLES rcP 1 J y I Height h rte 1 LA6PIAlA l Height 30 ft Dltt 0 2OC EMERGENCY COMM TOWER raotalsA fs 1 iCoveq lt a Heiyltt 0 h 1 s y 5 CEDAR GROVE PARK ty gym a Pleneei Rd 3 IIERIZON ROW a qb ry iVISTA TOWERS OCFA PROJECT s a Q Aj I J 11 3 cr I Rls p Legend EsisnusT11IoLile Site lteyuarelo tioi
- Page 1 and 2: ITEM 6 Report to the Planning Commi
- Page 3 and 4: I r l DR09 033 December 14 2010 Pag
- Page 5 and 6: l I i J I i I DR09 033 December 14
- Page 7 and 8: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 7 Ex
- Page 9 and 10: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 9 sa
- Page 11 and 12: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 11 C
- Page 13 and 14: DR09 033 December 14 2010 Page 13 C
- Page 15 and 16: ATTACHMENTA Location Map
- Page 17 and 18: ATTACHMENT B Land Use Fact Sheet
- Page 19 and 20: ATTACHMENT C Submitted Plans
- Page 21: Site Selection The proposed siteTMo
- Page 25 and 26: 0 z W v o N w v c 1 R NN j t a Mr a
- Page 27 and 28: I I I I W I o r J o Z W Q W e w y I
- Page 29 and 30: f i j t i r l r I f I I i l a 3 I j
- Page 31 and 32: I t 9 i I i a O to f E1e F c y us 1
- Page 33 and 34: M j i i i i I I I i i i t 1 i I i i
- Page 35 and 36: cw I I I J i i N ijy I I 5 1 S F I
- Page 37 and 38: t r i J i i r i I E W g b N O Q r t
- Page 39 and 40: O O Le O Q L Q N V 1 L 3 gin e 0 H
- Page 41 and 42: N i N LL V Q N H G i w
- Page 43 and 44: Ms Monica Moretta August 11 2010 Pa
- Page 45 and 46: Dear Mr Swiontek October 20 2010 Th
- Page 47 and 48: Letters of Support
- Page 49 and 50: Swiontek Ryan From Sent To Cc Subje
- Page 51 and 52: Swiontek Ryan From Sent To Subject
- Page 53 and 54: Letters of Opposition
- Page 55 and 56: Petition to Protect Cedar Grove Par
- Page 57 and 58: Petition to Protect Cedar Grove Par
- Page 59 and 60: Swiontek Ryan From Jennifer Wierks
- Page 61 and 62: Cell Towers continuously emit RF EM
- Page 63 and 64: Tustin CA 92782 715 573 9938 skomoC
- Page 65 and 66: 2 Playground equipment and picnic a
- Page 67 and 68: F 4 the costly and imported eucalyp
- Page 69 and 70: 6 5 The City Retains Power to Deny
- Page 71 and 72: J inATWireless PCS v Ciry Council o
in a quick signal loss even in close proximity<br />
bigger effect when closer to the antennas<br />
to the cell site Any<br />
obstruction has a<br />
At the same time the proposed height will allowco location <strong>of</strong> future carriers <strong>of</strong>fering a<br />
functional antenna location iuinintizing the number <strong>of</strong>cell sites needed for other carriers<br />
in the area<br />
Alternate location Analysis<br />
The table below shows RF Engilieering comments in regards to the alternate locations<br />
and the reasons why they won t work for the coverage needs in the referenced area<br />
Also refer to the attached exhibits at the end <strong>of</strong> this document Exhibit 1 shows a map<br />
with alternate locations Exhibit 2 shows a drive test map which consist <strong>of</strong> real time<br />
collected data<br />
Table 1<br />
e<br />
f I<br />
Handy Creek 1 1<br />
Monopole<br />
33 777399<br />
I I 1<br />
117 75531<br />
Monopole<br />
1<br />
1<br />
Existing TMobile s cell<br />
site at this location<br />
2 OC Emergency Facility s ground elevation<br />
Communications 33 764972 117<br />
Tower<br />
3 Verizon ROW 33 750518 117 76636 Street Light<br />
74635 Lattice Tower won twork for a cell site<br />
1300 ft<br />
Very low site street light<br />
with no collocation option<br />
tityfIrvine<br />
Jurisdic tiano Location ii<br />
approved will not work<br />
for the intended coverage<br />
Mono tree objective <strong>of</strong> this ring That<br />
4Vista Towers<br />
33 747584 117 76588<br />
OCFA Project proposed location may work better<br />
5 Cedar Grove Park 7520833 117 76976 Mono<br />
Tree<br />
forTMobile s toll road<br />
coverage and new<br />
residential area east <strong>of</strong> the<br />
toll road<br />
Current design proposal<br />
cedar will provide excellent<br />
coverage at Jamboree Rd<br />
and <strong>Tustin</strong> Rd intersection<br />
3
Change language