07.10.2014 Views

Template for the Preparation of Abstract

Template for the Preparation of Abstract

Template for the Preparation of Abstract

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

XXI International Symposium, Research-Education-Technology<br />

Gdansk, May 23 th – 24 th , 2013<br />

Experimental and numerical investigation <strong>of</strong> thin liquid layers at curved solid edges<br />

Oliver Sommer, Daniel Moller, Günter Wozniak<br />

Chemnitz University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering,<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Chair <strong>of</strong> Fluid Mechanics<br />

Chemnitz, D-09107, Germany<br />

oliver.sommer@mb.tu-chemnitz.de, daniel.moller@mb.tu-chemnitz.de, guenter.wozniak@mb.tu-chemnitz.de<br />

Keywords: laser induced fluorescence, computational fluid dynamics, thin liquid layer, curved surface, thickness distribution<br />

<strong>Abstract</strong><br />

The knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> thin liquid layers on<br />

solid surfaces is <strong>of</strong> fundamental interest as far as basic<br />

research or applications like technical coating or lubrication<br />

processes are concerned. The subject is currently getting<br />

more important, particularly due to <strong>the</strong> increasing<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> thin liquid layer functionalities.<br />

We <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e studied <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid<br />

layer thickness distribution field as well as <strong>the</strong> film<br />

disturbance propagation on a plane solid surface in <strong>the</strong><br />

vicinity <strong>of</strong> a curved solid edge experimentally and<br />

numerically using LIF (Laser-induced Fluorescence) and<br />

CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics), respectively.<br />

The investigation focusses on <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

initial layer thickness and solid surface curvature as well as<br />

liquid properties like viscosity and surface tension on <strong>the</strong><br />

film behavior, especially close to solid edges. Experimental<br />

and numerical results are shown pointing out relevant<br />

quantities <strong>for</strong> disturbance propagation and validation.<br />

1 Introduction<br />

A fundamental problem <strong>of</strong> coating is <strong>the</strong> adhesion<br />

between <strong>the</strong> liquid (later on <strong>the</strong> solidified liquid) and solid<br />

surface, facilitating through <strong>the</strong>se physical phenomena <strong>the</strong><br />

bonding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coating on <strong>the</strong> substrate. Ano<strong>the</strong>r problem is<br />

leveling and sagging, caused by gravity and in dependence<br />

on <strong>the</strong> viscosity, particularly <strong>the</strong> rebounding viscosity under<br />

low shearing conditions, after having applied high shearing<br />

conditions through applications like painting or atomization<br />

earlier. Our investigation also focusses on <strong>the</strong> liquid state,<br />

however <strong>the</strong> disturbance effects on <strong>the</strong> justified<br />

homogeneous liquid layer thickness applied on plane solid<br />

surfaces in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> curved solids edges. This<br />

phenomenon is known as edge/ corner thinning in coating<br />

applications (Meichsner et al. 2003, Mischke 2007),<br />

although <strong>the</strong> statements and assumptions are focused on <strong>the</strong><br />

curved solid surface area, which is losing liquid thickness.<br />

Our investigation is focused on <strong>the</strong> disturbance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

initial homogeneous thin liquid layer on <strong>the</strong> plane solid<br />

surface area at a curved solid edge (see fig. 2) and <strong>the</strong><br />

influence on <strong>the</strong> curved solid edge parts, too. For <strong>the</strong>se<br />

intensions we present and describe our experimental and<br />

numerical setup. The results <strong>of</strong> both approaches will be<br />

compared by introducing characteristic variables <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

disturbance description. With this study we want to deliver a<br />

contribution to <strong>the</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> underlying physics<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> edge thinning effect and <strong>the</strong> disturbance as well as to<br />

give some in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding technical applications.<br />

2 Theoretical background<br />

Imagine a homogeneous thin liquid layer at a curved<br />

solid edge. Four acting <strong>for</strong>ces are expected in this situation.<br />

These are basically <strong>the</strong> capillary <strong>for</strong>ce due to <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

tension, inertia and viscous <strong>for</strong>ce due to liquid flow and<br />

intermolecular interaction, respectively and <strong>the</strong> gravity <strong>for</strong>ce.<br />

The capillary <strong>for</strong>ce develops from <strong>the</strong> capillary pressure,<br />

which is described by Young-Laplace’s equation <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pressure jump on a free liquid surface:<br />

1 1 <br />

p <br />

<br />

. (1)<br />

R1 R 2 <br />

Since in our case <strong>the</strong> second radius <strong>of</strong> curvature goes<br />

to infinity, equation (1) leads to<br />

<br />

p . (2)<br />

R<br />

The pressure jump is here <strong>the</strong> hydrostatic pressure<br />

p = g h, representing <strong>the</strong> gravity and can be seen as a<br />

counterpart to <strong>the</strong> capillary pressure. Hence, it is possible to<br />

yield <strong>the</strong> dimensionless Bond-number Bo, which is defined<br />

as hydrostatic pressure in relation to <strong>the</strong> capillary pressure:<br />

g h R<br />

Bo . (3)<br />

<br />

The Bond number characterizes <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gravity <strong>for</strong>ce when compared to <strong>the</strong><br />

capillary <strong>for</strong>ce. Thus a droplet on a flat surface, <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

tends to be a sphere <strong>for</strong> small and a flat lens <strong>for</strong> high Bond<br />

numbers, see fig. 1.<br />

Figure 1: Photograph <strong>of</strong> different contact angles <strong>of</strong> 3 liquids<br />

on a solid surface; reduced surface tension by surfactants<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> a thin liquid layer, which is applied to a<br />

curved solids surface, <strong>the</strong> layer surface will also be curved<br />

with a curvature radius similar to <strong>the</strong> solid one, as illustrated<br />

in <strong>the</strong> following picture. There<strong>for</strong>e we obtain capillary<br />

pressure within <strong>the</strong> curved part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid layer, which is a<br />

potential liquid flow driver, perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> curved part<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> plane area. The counter <strong>for</strong>ces are basically <strong>the</strong><br />

viscous and <strong>the</strong> gravity <strong>for</strong>ce. The gravity impact depends on<br />

<strong>the</strong> orientation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface normal vector to <strong>the</strong> gravity<br />

vector. Since <strong>the</strong> liquid flow will be slow, <strong>the</strong> viscous <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

will be dominant and <strong>the</strong> inertia <strong>for</strong>ce will have less effect.


XXI International Symposium, Research-Education-Technology<br />

Gdansk, May 23 th – 24 th , 2013<br />

Figure 2: Illustration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> edge/ corner thinning effect and<br />

<strong>the</strong> disturbance effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid layer<br />

Once a steady state is reached, a disturbance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>mer homogeneous liquid layer in <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> a hump will be<br />

visible. It develops parallel to <strong>the</strong> curved solid edge within<br />

<strong>the</strong> plane solid surface part.<br />

3 Experimental setup<br />

For <strong>the</strong> experiments on <strong>the</strong> liquid layer thickness<br />

distribution <strong>the</strong> so-called Laser-induced Fluorescence<br />

technique LIF was used, which is applied usually <strong>for</strong><br />

measurement and propagation <strong>of</strong> liquid-liquid or sometimes<br />

<strong>of</strong> liquid-gas mixing problems as well as problems in<br />

microbiology, micr<strong>of</strong>luidics and in fluid mechanic heat and<br />

mass transfer problems (Glawdel el al. (2008) and Petracci<br />

et al. (2006)). In this experimental investigation <strong>the</strong> general<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> measuring liquid thickness using LIF, allowing<br />

non-invasive and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e non-destructive detections, is<br />

similar to investigations <strong>of</strong> Ausner et al. (2005) and Ausner<br />

(2006) but in much smaller liquid thickness dimensions and<br />

in different experimental setups.<br />

The need <strong>of</strong> fluorescing substances, which can be<br />

mixed into <strong>the</strong> applied liquid without changing <strong>the</strong> liquid<br />

properties, is mandatory as well as an exciting light source<br />

and a camera device, equipped with optical filters <strong>for</strong> signal<br />

detection. The applied fluorescence substance was mixed<br />

into <strong>the</strong> liquid with a mass weight ratio <strong>of</strong> about 1:10,000,<br />

resulting in negligible changes in liquid properties like<br />

density, viscosity and surface tension. The use <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />

optical filters in front <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> camera device is necessary to<br />

avoid detection <strong>of</strong> disturbing light intensity. In our case we<br />

used a so-called band-pass filter, which permits a light<br />

transparency close to 1.0 in <strong>the</strong> relevant wavelength, while<br />

blocking all o<strong>the</strong>r wavelengths. The exciting light source<br />

was a diode-laser with an emitting wavelength <strong>of</strong><br />

= 532 nm and a constant optical power output <strong>of</strong><br />

P = 40 mW. Equipped with a special optical lens (a so-called<br />

Powell lens), it was possible to achieve an anti-Gaussian<br />

spaced line pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laser beam within objective<br />

distances <strong>of</strong> 200 mm ≤ l ≤ ∞.<br />

The typical experimental setup <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above mentioned<br />

light source, camera device and solid substrate is shown as<br />

schematic in fig. 3. The orthogonal arrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> light<br />

source and <strong>the</strong> camera device to <strong>the</strong> solid substrate is well<br />

visible as well as <strong>the</strong> homogenous distributed laser line<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile and <strong>the</strong> band-pass filter in front <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> camera device.<br />

For our needs <strong>of</strong> an objective distance to solid/ liquid surface<br />

l ≥ 0.5 m (space <strong>for</strong> coating application), we used an<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> f = 80 mm focal length in combination with<br />

intermediate rings (50 mm) and yield a photograph (range <strong>of</strong><br />

interest, ROI) <strong>of</strong> about 58.5 mm x 10.5 mm. The camera<br />

device was a b/ w Basler Scout type with a maximum spatial<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> 1392 Pixel x 1040 Pixel and 12 bit intensity<br />

resolution. The maximum frame grabbing speed was about<br />

17 fps.<br />

Figure 3: Schematic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental arrangement<br />

For camera controlling a Labview program was written<br />

to apply typical camera and acquisition parameters including<br />

<strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> interest (ROI) and <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> visual recording<br />

(fps). A second Labview program was used <strong>for</strong> picture post<br />

processing. Figure 4 shows a typically photograph <strong>of</strong> one<br />

parameter setup <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid layer distribution using <strong>the</strong> LIF<br />

technique. A good visibility has been identified due to <strong>the</strong><br />

higher emitted intensity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid layer disturbance at <strong>the</strong><br />

solid surface curvature on <strong>the</strong> left side, while <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

emitted line has about <strong>the</strong> same intensity.<br />

Figure 4: Photograph <strong>of</strong> a typical liquid layer thickness<br />

distribution at curved solid surface with LIF technique<br />

The corresponding liquid layer thickness distribution,<br />

which is generated by our post processing program, is<br />

measured in dimensionless intensity units and <strong>the</strong> position is<br />

given in Pixel, see fig. 5.<br />

Figure 5: Experimental result <strong>of</strong> a typical liquid layer<br />

intensity distribution at a curved solid surface<br />

This figure also shows <strong>the</strong> respective variables <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

disturbance description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> homogenous film at <strong>the</strong><br />

curved solid surface, namely <strong>the</strong> bandwidth x, <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum emitted light intensity I max and its position x max .<br />

The averaged intensity I avg at a distance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> solid surface<br />

curvature is illustrated, too. The ratio <strong>of</strong> justified liquid layer<br />

thickness, which is calculated by multiplication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

measured solidified thickness with <strong>the</strong> factor 2, and <strong>the</strong><br />

averaged intensity yields in an intensity-liquid thickness<br />

scaling factor b. In <strong>the</strong> same manner <strong>the</strong> geometric scaling<br />

factor a is obtained, here by <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> measured distance in


length unit to <strong>the</strong> counted number <strong>of</strong> Pixel. Using <strong>the</strong>se two<br />

scaling factors, <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer thickness and its<br />

position are obtained in length units, see fig. 6.<br />

XXI International Symposium, Research-Education-Technology<br />

Gdansk, May 23 th – 24 th , 2013<br />

The liquid layer maximum thickness s max and its<br />

normalized position to <strong>the</strong> substrate beginning x max are yield<br />

by a polynomial fit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intensity values within <strong>the</strong><br />

bandwidth array mentioned earlier, and a following search <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> peak value. Tracked over <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> normalized<br />

position x max becomes a characteristic velocity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rise.<br />

With <strong>the</strong> bandwidth-time plot in mind, <strong>the</strong> plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum liquid layer thickness s max , <strong>the</strong> justified liquid<br />

layer thickness s avg as well as <strong>the</strong> ratio s* = s max / s avg <strong>of</strong> both<br />

give a good picture <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disturbance<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thin liquid layer at solid curved edges in space and<br />

time.<br />

Figure 6: Experimental result <strong>of</strong> a typical liquid layer<br />

thickness distribution at a curved solid surface<br />

The three important variables mentioned be<strong>for</strong>e, are<br />

tracked over <strong>the</strong> time until no more change was visible, see<br />

fig. 7-9. In each diagram <strong>the</strong>re is a black vertical line,<br />

representing <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> coating application, which means<br />

that at this time, and fur<strong>the</strong>r on, <strong>the</strong> disturbance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

homogeneous film could develop without external acting<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> atomizer. The bandwidth x is built through an<br />

array length, which contains <strong>the</strong> intensity (thickness) values,<br />

which are 105 % or higher than <strong>the</strong> averaged values from <strong>the</strong><br />

non-influenced area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid layer, see fig. 5.<br />

Figure 7: Liquid layer bandwidth x tracked over <strong>the</strong> time t<br />

Figure 8: Position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer<br />

thickness x max tracked over <strong>the</strong> time t<br />

Figure 9: Maximum liquid layer thickness s max (blue),<br />

justified liquid layer thickness s avg (red) and relative max.<br />

liquid layer thickness s* (green) at a solid surface edge<br />

tracked over time t<br />

Preconceiving a ratio <strong>of</strong> bandwidth and maximum<br />

liquid layer thickness, this value will represent <strong>the</strong> surface<br />

normal gradient, which will distinguish between good<br />

visible and not so conspicuous disturbances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

homogeneous liquid layer. Depending on <strong>the</strong> parameter<br />

configuration <strong>the</strong> disturbance rise comes to rest after about<br />

30 to 40 seconds. Curve fitting has been applied to each<br />

variable (fig. 7-9), to yield values describing <strong>the</strong> final steady<br />

state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disturbance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thin liquid layer at curved<br />

solid edges.<br />

4 Numerical setup<br />

For <strong>the</strong> numerical approach we used a commercial<br />

available CFD code, termed STAR-CCM + from <strong>the</strong><br />

company cd-adapco. This s<strong>of</strong>tware contains different<br />

methods <strong>for</strong> modeling multiphase flows. Since we are<br />

interested in <strong>the</strong> resolving and tracking <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid-gas<br />

interface, i.e. <strong>the</strong> liquid surface curvature and thus <strong>the</strong><br />

capillary pressure, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eulerian approach based<br />

Volume <strong>of</strong> Fluid Method (VOF) has been applied. This<br />

method uses <strong>the</strong> level-set method by Brackbill et al. (1992)<br />

and is capable to simulate and to display <strong>the</strong> liquid surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> a liquid-gas fluid arrangement, e.g. <strong>the</strong> liquid depth or<br />

wave height in typical marine applications.<br />

Our interest lies in <strong>the</strong> liquid depth, particularly in <strong>the</strong><br />

liquid layer thickness on a curved solid substrate in<br />

connection with capillary pressure and corresponding<br />

capillary <strong>for</strong>ces driven effects on <strong>the</strong> homogenous justified<br />

film. Beside <strong>the</strong> VOF model, o<strong>the</strong>r physical models were<br />

applied like gravity, laminar flow and transient time regime.<br />

In a similar manner liquid and gas properties (see table 1),<br />

boundary and initial conditions were set.


Table 1: typical fluid property configuration<br />

liquid<br />

gas<br />

= 1,020 kg/ m 3 = 1.184 kg/ m 3<br />

(t) = 0.2 Pa s + 0.02 Pa ∙ t = 0.018 mPa s<br />

= 28.0 mN/ m<br />

The following two pictures show a typical simulation<br />

at <strong>the</strong> beginning and <strong>the</strong> result after 20 seconds. Clearly<br />

visible, a homogeneous thin liquid layer <strong>of</strong> justified<br />

thickness and surface curvatures exists. The liquid layer<br />

thickness is displayed as scalar field on <strong>the</strong> liquid surface as<br />

a blue to red scale, where blue indicates small values and red<br />

bigger thicknesses. With <strong>the</strong> intension <strong>of</strong> reducing<br />

computational ef<strong>for</strong>t, two different solid surface curvatures<br />

were applied. On <strong>the</strong> left side we always found a bigger<br />

curvature radius than on <strong>the</strong> right side and <strong>the</strong> plane area<br />

situated between <strong>the</strong> two curved parts was built large enough<br />

to avoid overlapping <strong>of</strong> both developing humps.<br />

XXI International Symposium, Research-Education-Technology<br />

Gdansk, May 23 th – 24 th , 2013<br />

The bandwidth x and <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer<br />

thickness s max and its position x max were evaluated and<br />

plotted over <strong>the</strong> time, likewise in <strong>the</strong> experimental post<br />

processing.<br />

An effective simulation means an optimal spatial and<br />

temporal resolution in combination with <strong>the</strong> time ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>of</strong><br />

one simulation including post processing. Thus, verification<br />

simulations with different resolutions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> numeric mesh<br />

and transient time steps were per<strong>for</strong>med (fig. 13). It turned<br />

out that a mesh with about 1 million elements in<br />

combination with a transient time step <strong>of</strong> t = 0.001 s was<br />

<strong>the</strong> best compromise between numeric accuracy and real<br />

time ef<strong>for</strong>t. Here a local spatial resolution <strong>of</strong> 1 % to 5 % <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> quarter circumference, built by <strong>the</strong> solid surface<br />

curvature, was applied in combination with an equidistantly<br />

grown boundary layer mesh, which allowed a liquid<br />

thickness resolution <strong>of</strong> about 2.0 µm.<br />

Figure 10: Initial liquid layer thickness distribution at t = 0 s<br />

Figure 13: Numerical verification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> model using<br />

different spatial and temporal resolutions<br />

The following three pictures (fig. 14-16) show <strong>the</strong> time<br />

plots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bandwidth x, <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer<br />

thickness s max and its position x max at <strong>the</strong> plane solid surface,<br />

likewise in <strong>the</strong> experiment.<br />

Figure 11: Liquid layer thickness distribution at t = 20 s<br />

For post processing, <strong>the</strong> liquid layer thickness<br />

distribution in <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substrate’s height is<br />

extracted as a line probe every second and plotted over <strong>the</strong><br />

plane area position, see fig. 12.<br />

Figure 14: Liquid layer bandwidth x versus <strong>the</strong> time t<br />

Figure 12: Numerical result <strong>of</strong> a typical liquid layer<br />

thickness distribution at curved solid surfaces at t = 20 s<br />

The bandwidth x decreases with time in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

manner as in <strong>the</strong> experiments. This also is <strong>the</strong> case <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

maximum liquid layer thickness position time plot as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer thickness sequence. A curve<br />

fitting was applied to <strong>the</strong> numerically achieved<br />

bandwidth x, <strong>the</strong> position x max and height <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum<br />

liquid layer thickness s max to get <strong>the</strong> steady state values <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> problem.


XXI International Symposium, Research-Education-Technology<br />

Gdansk, May 23 th – 24 th , 2013<br />

<strong>the</strong> numerical time, which is identical to <strong>the</strong> application<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental application.<br />

Figure 15: Position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer thickness<br />

x max tracked over <strong>the</strong> time t<br />

Figure 17: Comparison <strong>of</strong> experimental (blue dots) and<br />

numerical results (red line); bandwidth x versus time t<br />

Figure 16: Maximum liquid layer thickness s max<br />

(blue: r C = 3.0 mm, red: r C = 2.0 mm) close to <strong>the</strong> solid<br />

surface curvature and relative max. liquid layer thickness s*<br />

(green: r C , violet: r C ) tracked as a function <strong>of</strong> time t<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> computational resources were limited, <strong>the</strong><br />

simulation time ended with 20 seconds in each simulation<br />

run. This duration was adequate <strong>for</strong> a good comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> experimental and numerical results, because <strong>the</strong><br />

diagrams 14-16 show that <strong>the</strong>re were no more drastic<br />

changes expected.<br />

5 Results and discussion<br />

The following 3 diagrams illustrate <strong>the</strong> liquid layer<br />

bandwidth x, <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer thickness<br />

position x max and <strong>the</strong> maximum liquid layer thickness s max<br />

over <strong>the</strong> time t <strong>of</strong> one experimental (blue dots) and one<br />

numerical result (red line), which were per<strong>for</strong>med with an<br />

identical parameter setup. It is clearly visible, that <strong>the</strong>y fit<br />

each o<strong>the</strong>r quite well. Very small deviations are only visible<br />

between <strong>the</strong> experimental dots and <strong>the</strong> numerical lines<br />

within <strong>the</strong> 12 th to <strong>the</strong> 30 th second. This can be explained by<br />

<strong>the</strong> small errors which occur in both investigation<br />

approaches through <strong>the</strong> compromises, which had to be<br />

applied, facilitating this investigation in general.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less <strong>the</strong> time dependent functions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chosen<br />

variables <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> disturbance description are very similar and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> steady state values are very close to equality.<br />

The numerical curves always begin later with time<br />

than <strong>the</strong> experimental ones. This is due to <strong>the</strong> ideal initial<br />

conditions in <strong>the</strong> numerical simulation. Here we could set a<br />

homogeneous distributed liquid film <strong>of</strong> desired thickness at<br />

<strong>the</strong> beginning, while in <strong>the</strong> experiments we had to apply it<br />

first by a suitable application. Thus we set an <strong>of</strong>fset-time to<br />

Figure 18: Comparison <strong>of</strong> experimental and numerical<br />

results; maximum thickness position x max versus time t<br />

Figure 19: Comparison <strong>of</strong> experimental (blue dots) and<br />

numerical results (red line); maximum liquid layer thickness<br />

s max versus time t<br />

These diagrams also show that our chosen total<br />

simulation time, which is smaller than <strong>the</strong> experimental time,<br />

is well suitable to predict <strong>the</strong> liquid layer thickness<br />

distribution and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> disturbance <strong>of</strong> thin liquid<br />

layers at curved solid edges. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> simulation<br />

shows <strong>the</strong> liquid layer thickness distribution on <strong>the</strong> curved<br />

part <strong>of</strong> a solid, too. Thus a prediction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> edge/ corner<br />

thinning effect would also be possible, fig. 20.


XXI International Symposium, Research-Education-Technology<br />

Gdansk, May 23 th – 24 th , 2013<br />

T. Glawdel et al., Photobleaching absorbed Rhodamine B to<br />

improve temperature measurements in PDMS microchannels.<br />

Lab on Chip, Vol. 9, 171-174 (2009)<br />

A. Petracci, R. Delfos, J. Westerweel, Combined PIV/LIF<br />

measurements in a Rayleight-Bénard convection cell. 13 th<br />

Int. Symp. on Applications <strong>of</strong> Laser Techniques to Fluid<br />

Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal (2006)<br />

Figure 20: Liquid layer thickness distribution on a curved<br />

solid surface at t = 20.0 s<br />

6 Concluding remarks and outlook<br />

In this investigation we studied <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong> an<br />

experimental measurement and a numerical simulation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> transient development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disturbance <strong>of</strong> a thin liquid<br />

layer at a curved solid edge and in <strong>the</strong> steady state. For this<br />

we developed a suitable experimental setup with a<br />

self-written program code <strong>for</strong> semi-automatic post<br />

processing. A suitable numerical approach was established,<br />

too. We identified convenient variables <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> description <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> disturbance development and <strong>for</strong> an interpretation in<br />

view <strong>of</strong> technical applications. The experimental and<br />

numerical results fit each o<strong>the</strong>r very well, so that predictions<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> liquid layer thickness distributions on solid surfaces<br />

are possible. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> numerical approach is capable<br />

to give results describing <strong>the</strong> edge thinning effect.<br />

Future investigations as well as already on-going<br />

studies are focused on <strong>the</strong> influences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dependencies <strong>of</strong><br />

typical technical parameters and liquid properties. However<br />

<strong>the</strong> normal orientation vector <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substrate, material and<br />

roughness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> substrate as well as o<strong>the</strong>r coating<br />

applications will be taken into account, too.<br />

I. Ausner, A. H<strong>of</strong>fmann, J.-U. Repke and G. Wozny,<br />

Experimentelle und numerische Untersuchungen<br />

mehrphasiger Filmströmungen. Chemie Ingenieur Technik,<br />

Vol. 77, No. 6, 735-741 (2005)<br />

I. Ausner, Experimentelle Untersuchungen mehrphasiger<br />

Filmströmungen. Dissertation, TU Berlin (2006)<br />

H. Du et al., PhotochemCAD: A computer-aided design and<br />

research tool in photochemistry. Photochem. Photobiol. Vol.<br />

68 (2), 141-142 (1998)<br />

J.U. Brackbill, D.B. Ko<strong>the</strong> and C. Zemach, A Continuum<br />

Method <strong>for</strong> Modeling Surface Tension, Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Computational Physics, Vol. 100, 335-354 (1992)<br />

T.G. Mezger, Das Rheologie Handbuch, Vincentz Network,<br />

Hannover (2010)<br />

Nomenclature<br />

symbol description unit<br />

a geometric scale factor [mm/ px]<br />

b intensity-liquid thickness scale factor [µm/ -]<br />

I avg averaged emitted light intensity [-]<br />

I max maximum emitted light intensity [-]<br />

r C solid surface curvature radius [mm]<br />

r l liquid surface curvature radius [mm]<br />

s avg justified liquid layer thickness [µm]<br />

s max maximum liquid layer thickness [µm]<br />

s* relative maximum liquid layer thickness [%]<br />

t time [s]<br />

x max maximum liquid layer thickness position [mm]<br />

x liquid layer disturbance bandwidth [mm]<br />

<br />

viscosity [Pa s]<br />

density [kg/ m 3 ]<br />

surface tension [mN/ m]<br />

References<br />

G. Meichsner, T.G. Mezger, J. Schröder, Lackeigenschaften<br />

messen und steuern. Coatings Compendien, Vincentz<br />

Network, Hannover (2003)<br />

P. Mischke, Filmbildung. Filmbildung in modernen<br />

Lacksystemen. Vincentz Network, Hannover (2007)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!