Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services

Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services

trusteeservices.biz
from trusteeservices.biz More from this publisher
05.10.2014 Views

1 A. To the best of my recollection, we were Page 78 2 short on cash. I couldn't make the check good, so I 3 was telling him to hold it. 4 Q. Was it your understanding that in 5 representing to Mr. Tonacchio that he needed to hold 6 the check, you were in effect telling him, I don't 7 have the funds to make good on this check? 8 A. No, that's -- no, no, that's not what I 9 said. That's what -- that's the reason I was doing 10 it. I don't know why I told him to hold it. 11 Q. Well, what would you possibly represent to 12 him as to why you would need to hold the check? 13 MR. SALIM: Form. 14 THE WITNESS: Could have been a myriad of 15 reasons. I don't want to guess. Unless I see an 16 e-mail related to this, sir, I can't tell you with 17 any certainty. 18 BY MR. GAY: 19 Q. If it was in relation to one of the 20 settlement agreement related deals, I understand from 21 prior testimony that what was represented was that you 22 had settled pre suit litigation on behalf of a client. 23 Defendant in that underlying litigation had funded a 24 settlement payment that your law firm was holding in 25 an account; is that correct?

1 A. Yes, sir. Page 79 2 Q. So according to what you represented 3 regarding the settlement agreement related deals, 4 there would be no reason for you to ever miss a 5 payment; is that correct? 6 MR. SALIM: Form. 7 THE WITNESS: If it was a settlement 8 funding deal, that's correct. 9 BY MR. GAY: 10 Q. But if it were a bridge loan related deal 11 that would be something different? 12 A. If we were waiting -- if it was a bridge 13 loan deal, yes, because that would have been waiting 14 for the putative client to repay the loan. A big 15 difference. 16 Q. If you'd look at Document 00219, please. 17 A. I have it. 18 Q. It's a July 12, 2007 e-mail from Scott 19 Rothstein to TL Investors. You see that? 20 A. I do. 21 Q. It says, "Any news on the wire... just got 22 an agitated call from my bank." You see that? 23 A. I do. 24 Q. Do you know what this e-mail was in 25 reference to?

1 A. Yes, sir.<br />

Page 79<br />

2 Q. So according to what you <strong>re</strong>p<strong>re</strong>sented<br />

3 <strong>re</strong>garding the settlement ag<strong>re</strong>ement <strong>re</strong>lated deals,<br />

4 the<strong>re</strong> would be no <strong>re</strong>ason for you to ever miss a<br />

5 payment; is that cor<strong>re</strong>ct?<br />

6 MR. SALIM: Form.<br />

7 THE WITNESS: If it was a settlement<br />

8 funding deal, that's cor<strong>re</strong>ct.<br />

9 BY MR. GAY:<br />

10 Q. But if it we<strong>re</strong> a bridge loan <strong>re</strong>lated deal<br />

11 that would be something diffe<strong>re</strong>nt?<br />

12 A. If we we<strong>re</strong> waiting -- if it was a bridge<br />

13 loan deal, yes, because that would have been waiting<br />

14 for the putative client to <strong>re</strong>pay the loan. A big<br />

15 diffe<strong>re</strong>nce.<br />

16 Q. If you'd look at Document 00219, please.<br />

17 A. I have it.<br />

18 Q. It's a July 12, 2007 e-mail from <strong>Scott</strong><br />

19 <strong>Rothstein</strong> to TL Investors. You see that?<br />

20 A. I do.<br />

21 Q. It says, "Any news on the wi<strong>re</strong>... just got<br />

22 an agitated call from my bank." You see that?<br />

23 A. I do.<br />

24 Q. Do you know what this e-mail was in<br />

25 <strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>nce to?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!