Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services

Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services

trusteeservices.biz
from trusteeservices.biz More from this publisher
05.10.2014 Views

1 "Interest is not six percent," and then "hehehehehe." 2 A. It appears to be a joke about something with 3 low interest rates, but I don't have a specific 4 recollection as to what I was referring to. 5 Q. Was the point of that statement that this 6 deal involved interest that was much, much higher than 7 six percent? 8 A. Yes. 9 Q. If you go on, the second line from the 10 bottom, it says, "Also I have your TVs." Do you see 11 that? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Can you tell me what that was about? 14 A. That related to a prior loan deal where the 15 way I pitched it was that the gentleman that they were 16 loaning the money to had decided to give them TVs from 17 someplace as an additional thank you for what they had 18 done for him. So that's referring definitely to a 19 loan deal, a private loan deal. 20 Q. But you were just making that up about the 21 TVs? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. Did you ever actually buy them TVs? 24 A. My recollection is ultimately I did send 25 them, but it was a ways down the road. Page 70

1 Q. If you'd look at Document 00226, please. Page 71 2 A. Okay. 3 Q. It's again an e-mail from you to, and this 4 time it just say Domenick Tonacchio in the "to" line 5 dated November 21, 2007. Do you see that? 6 A. Yes, I do. 7 Q. Subject is new deal, and then it lays out 8 some terms in the e-mail? 9 A. Yes, I have it. 10 Q. You see on the fifth line where it says, 11 "Interest is well in excess of 100 percent." 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Would this e-mail be indicative of one of 14 the bridge loan schemes -- scheme related deals? 15 A. This looks more like a settlement funding 16 deal, but I can't tell one way or the other. 17 Q. If you'd look at TL 00210, please. 18 A. I see that. 19 Q. It's an e-mail from you on March 27, 2007 to 20 Kathy Brown. Who's Kathy Brown? 21 A. She was Stuart Rosenfeldt's secretary at the 22 time. 23 Q. The subject of the firm is Barry Lipsitz. 24 Can you review that e-mail and tell me what that's in 25 reference to?

1 Q. If you'd look at Document 00226, please.<br />

Page 71<br />

2 A. Okay.<br />

3 Q. It's again an e-mail from you to, and this<br />

4 time it just say Domenick Tonacchio in the "to" line<br />

5 dated November 21, 2007. Do you see that?<br />

6 A. Yes, I do.<br />

7 Q. Subject is new deal, and then it lays out<br />

8 some terms in the e-mail?<br />

9 A. Yes, I have it.<br />

10 Q. You see on the fifth line whe<strong>re</strong> it says,<br />

11 "Inte<strong>re</strong>st is well in excess <strong>of</strong> 100 percent."<br />

12 A. Yes.<br />

13 Q. Would this e-mail be indicative <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong><br />

14 the bridge loan schemes -- scheme <strong>re</strong>lated deals?<br />

15 A. This looks mo<strong>re</strong> like a settlement funding<br />

16 deal, but I can't tell one way or the other.<br />

17 Q. If you'd look at TL 00210, please.<br />

18 A. I see that.<br />

19 Q. It's an e-mail from you on March 27, 2007 to<br />

20 Kathy Brown. Who's Kathy Brown?<br />

21 A. She was Stuart Rosenfeldt's sec<strong>re</strong>tary at the<br />

22 time.<br />

23 Q. The subject <strong>of</strong> the firm is Barry Lipsitz.<br />

24 Can you <strong>re</strong>view that e-mail and tell me what that's in<br />

25 <strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>nce to?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!