Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services

Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services Deposition of Scott Rothstein re - Trustee Services

trusteeservices.biz
from trusteeservices.biz More from this publisher
05.10.2014 Views

1 ultimately sold to Mr. Lipsitz and Mr. Tonacchio were 2 the bridge loan deals and the promissory note/e-mail 3 settlement funding. 4 BY MR. GAY: 5 Q. But those two things in your mind were 6 separate; is that right? Maybe you don't -- 7 A. In my mind it was all just a way to get 8 money for the Ponzi scheme. It was just a different 9 fraudulent stitch. 10 Q. Were Mr. Tonacchio and/or Mr. Lipsitz 11 involved in both types of deals? 12 A. If you have paper I will refresh my 13 recollection. I need to look at their e-mails. 14 Q. If you'd look at -- 15 A. You can tell by the e-mail what kind of deal 16 was pitched. 17 Q. If you'd look at TL 00204. Let me know when 18 you that in front of you. 19 A. I have it. 20 Q. It's a March 21, 2007 e-mail from you to 21 Barryflash@aol.com and TLinvestors@aol.com. You see 22 that? 23 A. Yes, sir, I have it. 24 Q. It says first, "Thank so much for your 25 assistance in this matter." Do you recall if that's Page 52

1 in reference to the Picou loan? Page 53 2 A. That's what it appears to be. 3 Q. Okay. And then in what's effectively the 4 third paragraph, it says, "I am in the process of 5 working on a second loan." Do you see that? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. It goes on to say, "Looks like the interest 8 rate will be 36 percent." 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. Do you think this e-mail is in reference to 11 the second "deal" that you entered into with 12 Mr. Tonacchio and/or Mr. Lipsitz? 13 MR. SALIM: Form. 14 THE WITNESS: Certainly could be. I'd need 15 to see the next series of e-mails or documents, then 16 I can tell you for certain. 17 BY MR. GAY: 18 Q. Well, part of the reason I ask is because 19 the promissory note that we looked at a little while 20 ago, which was referencing the Picou loan, was dated 21 March 19, 2007 and this e-mail is dated March 21, 22 2007. That's, I think, two days later. Does that 23 sound about right? 24 A. Yes, it is. It's referencing the Picou loan 25 and it looks like I'm pitching them a second deal.

1 in <strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>nce to the Picou loan?<br />

Page 53<br />

2 A. That's what it appears to be.<br />

3 Q. Okay. And then in what's effectively the<br />

4 third paragraph, it says, "I am in the process <strong>of</strong><br />

5 working on a second loan." Do you see that?<br />

6 A. Yes.<br />

7 Q. It goes on to say, "Looks like the inte<strong>re</strong>st<br />

8 rate will be 36 percent."<br />

9 A. Yes.<br />

10 Q. Do you think this e-mail is in <strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>nce to<br />

11 the second "deal" that you ente<strong>re</strong>d into with<br />

12 Mr. Tonacchio and/or Mr. Lipsitz?<br />

13 MR. SALIM: Form.<br />

14 THE WITNESS: Certainly could be. I'd need<br />

15 to see the next series <strong>of</strong> e-mails or documents, then<br />

16 I can tell you for certain.<br />

17 BY MR. GAY:<br />

18 Q. Well, part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>re</strong>ason I ask is because<br />

19 the promissory note that we looked at a little while<br />

20 ago, which was <strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>ncing the Picou loan, was dated<br />

21 March 19, 2007 and this e-mail is dated March 21,<br />

22 2007. That's, I think, two days later. Does that<br />

23 sound about right?<br />

24 A. Yes, it is. It's <strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>ncing the Picou loan<br />

25 and it looks like I'm pitching them a second deal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!