Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein (Albert ... - Trustee Services

Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein (Albert ... - Trustee Services Deposition Transcript of Scott Rothstein (Albert ... - Trustee Services

trusteeservices.biz
from trusteeservices.biz More from this publisher
05.10.2014 Views

1 Is it a fair statement that any invoice Page 70 2 that references "confidential project" and 3 Mr. Lefebvre, that those are all totally fabricated 4 times -- totally fabricated bills? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. I noted that one of the bills references 7 international security issues as well as domestic 8 security issues. 9 Are the international security issues 10 referenced in these bills that would be, for 11 instance, at page 143 -- are those also fictitious? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. And page 145, which references 14 investigative services for 40,000, would that also 15 be fictitious? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. By the way, did Mr. Lippman know that you 18 had all these fictitious invoices going out on the 19 Manfredi Lefebvre circumstance with Mr. Peter? 20 A. I don't recall one way or the other. 21 Q. Page 148. 22 If references all work performed on 23 Whitelock confidential project. 24 Was there a legitimate Whitelock 25 confidential special project you were working on?

1 A. Yes. Page 71 2 Q. There's a bill that is dated March 14, 3 2006. We didn't see any more detailed bills. 4 The bill that I'm just referencing, which 5 is at page 148, is for $86,250. 6 Is this a legitimate bill? 7 A. No. There was some minimal amount of work 8 done with reference to the Whitelock matter, but 9 nothing near that amount. This is just one of those 10 inflated bills. 11 Q. I don't want you to divulge attorney/client 12 communications, but what was the general nature of 13 the Whitelock special project? 14 A. A terminated employee threatening to sue 15 and a relationship to the Robin Lindsay matter. 16 Q. I have some legitimate bills that 17 references "Whitelock" and some legitimate bills that 18 reference "Lindsay." 19 Who would have knowledge also that a 20 portion of page 148 was fraudulent? 21 A. Me, Albert Peter, Debra Villegas, Irene 22 Stay, and likely anyone else that saw the bill that 23 actually knew what was being done on the file. 24 Q. At page 149 it's a bill -- March 14, 25 2006 -- in the amount of $37,525.

1 Is it a fair statement that any invoice<br />

Page 70<br />

2 that references "confidential project" and<br />

3 Mr. Lefebvre, that those are all totally fabricated<br />

4 times -- totally fabricated bills?<br />

5 A. Yes.<br />

6 Q. I noted that one <strong>of</strong> the bills references<br />

7 international security issues as well as domestic<br />

8 security issues.<br />

9 Are the international security issues<br />

10 referenced in these bills that would be, for<br />

11 instance, at page 143 -- are those also fictitious?<br />

12 A. Yes.<br />

13 Q. And page 145, which references<br />

14 investigative services for 40,000, would that also<br />

15 be fictitious?<br />

16 A. Yes.<br />

17 Q. By the way, did Mr. Lippman know that you<br />

18 had all these fictitious invoices going out on the<br />

19 Manfredi Lefebvre circumstance with Mr. Peter?<br />

20 A. I don't recall one way or the other.<br />

21 Q. Page 148.<br />

22 If references all work performed on<br />

23 Whitelock confidential project.<br />

24 Was there a legitimate Whitelock<br />

25 confidential special project you were working on?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!