05.10.2014 Views

Seasonal closure and minimum legal size for barramundi in the Gulf ...

Seasonal closure and minimum legal size for barramundi in the Gulf ...

Seasonal closure and minimum legal size for barramundi in the Gulf ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary<br />

The current <strong>m<strong>in</strong>imum</strong> <strong>legal</strong> length of <strong>barramundi</strong> <strong>in</strong> Queensl<strong>and</strong> waters of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> of<br />

Carpentaria is 60 cm. The species is also subject to an annual seasonal <strong>closure</strong> that<br />

starts <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ishes on variable dates that are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by lunar <strong>and</strong> tidal cycles.<br />

A monthly <strong>size</strong> <strong>and</strong> age structured model was used to predict <strong>the</strong> impact of chang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

both <strong>the</strong> <strong>m<strong>in</strong>imum</strong> <strong>legal</strong> length of <strong>barramundi</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> seasonal <strong>closure</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> to<br />

be consistent with <strong>the</strong> east coast (58 cm <strong>and</strong> 1 November to 1 January respectively).<br />

The model<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>in</strong>dicated that reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>m<strong>in</strong>imum</strong> <strong>legal</strong> length from 60 cm<br />

back to 58 cm was unlikely to have a detrimental impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> <strong>barramundi</strong><br />

stock. However, reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong> <strong>closure</strong> by one month would be likely to<br />

have a negative impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>size</strong> of spawn<strong>in</strong>g stocks as well as overall yield.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> analysis could not compare <strong>the</strong> use of a variable <strong>closure</strong> to one fixed <strong>in</strong><br />

time, it appears unlikely that such a move would have any detrimental effect on<br />

<strong>barramundi</strong> productivity, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong>, as long as <strong>the</strong><br />

overall length of <strong>the</strong> <strong>closure</strong> is not significantly reduced.<br />

The potential changes to <strong>the</strong> management regime <strong>for</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> <strong>barramundi</strong> to address <strong>the</strong><br />

issues that appear most suitable <strong>for</strong> consideration are:<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> seasonal <strong>closure</strong> to start on 7 October of every year <strong>and</strong> end on<br />

1 February of <strong>the</strong> next year<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>m<strong>in</strong>imum</strong> <strong>legal</strong> <strong>size</strong> of <strong>Gulf</strong> <strong>barramundi</strong> from 60 cm to 58 cm.<br />

These do not represent preferred management arrangements, but are simply a<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g position <strong>for</strong> discussion of <strong>the</strong>se issues through <strong>the</strong> review.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> current harvest level of <strong>Gulf</strong> <strong>barramundi</strong> is considered susta<strong>in</strong>able, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

a significant level of fish<strong>in</strong>g pressure on <strong>the</strong>se stocks. It may <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e be worth<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g, even if <strong>the</strong> risk of impacts on sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Gulf</strong> stocks from such changes is<br />

regarded as small, those measures that could even fur<strong>the</strong>r reduce that risk. Possible<br />

mitigat<strong>in</strong>g measures that have been identified are:<br />

Restrict fish<strong>in</strong>g access (prior to 7 October) to a significant estuar<strong>in</strong>e area <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

north western part of Cape York to protect aggregat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>barramundi</strong> <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

spawn<strong>in</strong>g species.<br />

Decrease <strong>the</strong> maximum <strong>legal</strong> <strong>size</strong> of <strong>barramundi</strong> to protect a greater proportion<br />

of female fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease egg production.<br />

Amend commercial <strong>barramundi</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g net mesh <strong>size</strong>s to select <strong>for</strong> a more<br />

restricted <strong>size</strong> range of fish <strong>and</strong> thus <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> spawn<strong>in</strong>g biomass.<br />

Introduce ano<strong>the</strong>r mechanism to constra<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> catch of <strong>barramundi</strong> below<br />

historical levels.<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong> it should be noted that <strong>the</strong>se measures do not represent preferred options,<br />

only options <strong>for</strong> consideration if any change to current management measures is<br />

supported through <strong>the</strong> process of <strong>the</strong> review.<br />

Technical report prepared <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gulf</strong> f<strong>in</strong>fish review. Not government policy. 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!