05.10.2014 Views

PROCALCITONIN Evaluation & Use In Victoria, BC

PROCALCITONIN Evaluation & Use In Victoria, BC

PROCALCITONIN Evaluation & Use In Victoria, BC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PROCALCITONIN</strong><br />

<strong>Evaluation</strong> & <strong>Use</strong><br />

<strong>In</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong>, <strong>BC</strong><br />

J Penman, MD<br />

30 th September 2010


CONTENTS<br />

SIRS, SEPSIS, PCT HISTORY & PHYSIOLOGY<br />

ASSAYS & INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

RESULTS OF PCT VERSUS CRP<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTING SERVICE<br />

LESSONS OF THE FIRST 6 MONTHS<br />

OTHER USES


SIRS & SEPSIS:<br />

SIRS Systemic <strong>In</strong>flammatory Reaction<br />

Syndrome, Characterized by >2 of following<br />

Fever or hypothermia >38 or 90 beats / min<br />

Tachypnea >20 breaths / min or PaCO2 >32 torr<br />

Leucocytosis or leucopenia >12 or


HISTORY OF PCT<br />

Originally investigated as a marker for<br />

medullary thyroid cancer in the 1970s<br />

Relationship to sepsis found in the 1990s<br />

Desired to distinguish Sepsis from SIRS<br />

Advent of 1st automated assay (Brahms)<br />

Other assays developed (Brahms patent)


PHYSIOLOGY-1<br />

PCT is the precursor molecule of Calcitonin<br />

Calcitonin only secreted by thyroid C-cells and acts<br />

to increase blood calcium.<br />

All body cells can transcribe the CALCA gene<br />

Main triggers are G-ve lipopolysaccharides (LPS),<br />

G+ve cell wall antigens & bacterial toxins that react<br />

with Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) on cell surfaces.<br />

These cells secrete Procalcitonin, not calcitonin


PCT STRUCTURE<br />

PRODUCT OF THE CALCITONIN RELATED POLYPEPTIDE<br />

ALPHA GENE (CALCA) ON CHROMOSOME 11 (p15.2)<br />

PCT OF THYROID C-CELLS 116 AA LONG<br />

PCT OF OTHER CELLS 114 AA LONG


THYROID C-CELL


OTHER BODY CELLS


PHYSIOLOGY-2<br />

Stimulated by bacterial Products on TLRs<br />

Part of innate immunity - uncertain function<br />

Reports of added PCT worsening inflammation<br />

Reports of removal of PCT decreasing inflammation<br />

<strong>In</strong>creased levels detectable within 6h<br />

Half life 30h<br />

Without stimulus, drops 30-50% within 24h<br />

Disposal – <strong>In</strong>ternal degradation, renal clearance<br />

is minor


PCT KINETICS


CONTENTS<br />

SIRS, SEPSIS, PCT HISTORY & PHYSIOLOGY<br />

ASSAYS & INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

RESULTS OF PCT VERSUS CRP<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTING SERVICE<br />

LESSONS OF THE FIRST 6 MONTHS<br />

OTHER USES


AUTOMATED ASSAYS<br />

Brahms Kryptor CL immunoassays<br />

All other assays under license from Brahms<br />

Calibrated against Brahms standards<br />

Licensed by Brahms; patent holder on PCT<br />

Roche ECL immunoassay<br />

BioMerieux Vidas CL immunoassay<br />

Siemens Centaur CL immunoassay<br />

Diasorin Liason CL immunoassay


INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

Objectives:<br />

Evaluate VIDAS & Roche assays<br />

Compare PCT to CRP (our prev.marker)<br />

Process:<br />

Collected 22 suspect sepsis + 2 without SIRS<br />

PCT (both assays) & CRP daily for 2-4 days<br />

Results compared to culture & clinical<br />

information from patients’ charts


COBAS ACCURACY<br />

Apparatus: Roche Cobas e601<br />

Analyte: <strong>PROCALCITONIN</strong><br />

Samples: PC PCT Level 1 & 2 (Roche QC)/VIDAS QC 1&2 Unit: ug/L<br />

Operator: Jennifer Annand Accuracy tolerance limit : 10.0%<br />

Level Sample Id Date Result 1 Result 2 Mean Result Assigned Deviation Accepted<br />

Mean (%)<br />

1 Vidas QC1 15-Jun-09 12.79 13.05 12.92 16.80 -23.1% NO<br />

2 Vidas QC2 15-Jun-09 1.40 1.43 1.42 1.79 -20.9% NO<br />

3<br />

4 PC PCT 1 15-Jun-09 0.494 0.486 0.49 0.48 2.1% YES<br />

5 PC PCT 2 15-Jun-09 9.80 9.88 9.84 9.69 1.5% YES<br />

Level Sample Id Date Result 1 Result 2 Mean Result Assigned<br />

Mean<br />

Deviation<br />

(%)<br />

Accepted<br />

1 Vidas QC1 16-Jun-09 12.85 12.88 12.87 16.80 -23.4% NO<br />

2 Vidas QC2 16-Jun-09 1.45 1.40 1.43 1.79 -20.4% NO<br />

3 FALSE<br />

4 PC PCT 1 16-Jun-09 0.477 0.485 0.48 0.48 0.2% YES<br />

5 PC PCT 2 16-Jun-09 9.71 9.82 9.77 9.69 0.8% YES


90<br />

80<br />

y = 0.8418x - 0.4055<br />

R² = 0.9949<br />

Roche e601 PCT (ug/L)<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />

BioMerieux VIDAS PCT (ug/L)<br />

PCT Analytical-Systems Correlation between<br />

the Roche e601 and the BioMerieux VIDAS


ANALYZER SYSTEM METHOD MATRIX<br />

PCT<br />

ug/L<br />

Total<br />

Imprecision<br />

LLOQ<br />

ug/L<br />

BioMerieux VIDAS<br />

Chemiluminescence<br />

Monoclonal abs.<br />

Sandwich assay<br />

Vendor QC-1 15.28 2.91%<br />

BioMerieux VIDAS Vendor QC-2 1.76 3.56%<br />

0.09<br />

Roche Cobas e601<br />

Human Pl.-1 0.07 6.94%<br />

Electro-Chemi-<br />

Roche Cobas e601<br />

Luminescence<br />

Monoclonal abs.<br />

Human Pl.-2 4.86 1.35%<br />

Sandwich assay<br />

0.05-0.07<br />

Roche Cobas e601 Human Pl.-3 63.16 3.56%<br />

Table 1: Technology, precision and lower limit of quantitation of analyzer-systems


CONTENTS<br />

SIRS, SEPSIS, PCT HISTORY & PHYSIOLOGY<br />

ASSAYS & INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

RESULTS OF PCT VERSUS CRP<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTING SERVICE<br />

LESSONS OF THE FIRST 6 MONTHS<br />

OTHER USES


12.00<br />

LEGEND: VIDAS v CRP; ROCHE v CRP<br />

10.00<br />

8.00<br />

PCT (ug/L)<br />

6.00<br />

4.00<br />

y = 0.0148x + 0.7489<br />

R² = 0.1824<br />

y = 0.0148x + 0.1715<br />

R² = 0.2746<br />

2.00<br />

0.00<br />

0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00<br />

CRPs (mg/L)<br />

Correlation of PCTs with CRPs for PCT


INITIAL PCT AND CRP RESULTS<br />

CULTURE RESULTS (N)<br />

INTIAL PCT<br />

RANGE (MEDIAN)<br />

INITIAL CRP<br />

RANGE (MEDIAN)<br />

BLOOD CULT POS (7) 0.44->100 (63) 23-341 (87)<br />

OTHER CULT POS (7) 0.13-45 (5.0) 136-253 (207)<br />

CULTURE ND/NEG (10)


BLOOD CULTURE POSITIVE CASES<br />

<strong>In</strong> 5/7 cases the CRP results do not correlate with PCT nor with clinical status or changes<br />

CASES<br />

VIDAS<br />

CLIN CORREL<br />

VIDAS<br />

PCT<br />

CRPs<br />

ROCHE<br />

PCT<br />

ROCHE<br />

CLIN CORREL<br />

CULTURE RESULTS<br />

CLINICAL<br />

CORRELATION<br />

SEPSIS<br />

RANGES<br />

BACTERIAL<br />

INFECTION<br />

A<br />

C<br />

H<br />

I<br />

L<br />

O<br />

R<br />

1.25<br />

1.48<br />

1.01<br />

0.93<br />

>100<br />

>100<br />

>100<br />

50.08<br />

0.45<br />

0.60<br />

0.79<br />

82.28<br />

85.73<br />

59.47<br />

37<br />

39<br />

52<br />

45<br />

32<br />

159<br />

246<br />

195<br />

23<br />

44<br />

54<br />

258<br />

309<br />

327<br />

0.708<br />

0.864<br />

BL: MRSA<br />

BL: MRSA<br />

Improved with Rx<br />

SEPTIC SHOCK >100 PRESENT<br />

SHOCK LIKELY >50102100<br />

BL:E.col<br />

Recovered on Rx<br />

POSSIBLE >0.50100 UNLIKELY 0.25 - 0.50 LIKELY<br />

75.93 ABSENT 0.10 - 100<br />

>100<br />

341<br />

353<br />

87<br />

118<br />

62<br />

62.97<br />

28.47<br />

>100<br />

>100<br />

>100<br />

BL:Listeria<br />

CSF:Listeria<br />

SP/UR:NG<br />

BL: E.coli<br />

UR:NG<br />

BL:MRSA<br />

SPT:MRSA<br />

BL:E.coli<br />

BL:E.coli<br />

BL:MSSA<br />

Remained <strong>In</strong>fected. Antibiotic changed<br />

after these results<br />

Discharged 2 days<br />

after last result<br />

Improved clinically & on CXR over this time<br />

Improved. Oral Rx subsequent<br />

Died in septic shock


PCT v OTHER MKRS<br />

SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment<br />

Brahms’ data: www.procalcitonin.com


CONTENTS<br />

SIRS, SEPSIS, PCT HISTORY & PHYSIOLOGY<br />

ASSAYS & INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

RESULTS OF PCT VERSUS CRP<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTING SERVICE<br />

LESSONS OF THE FIRST 6 MONTHS<br />

OTHER USES


THE VALUE OF PCT<br />

Decision to treat with antibiotics:<br />

<br />

High negative predictive value (NPV) – ER Triage,<br />

Culture & treat / admit or discharge<br />

Wait 6-12h & repeat PCT / admit or discharge<br />

Monitoring Treatment<br />

<br />

PCT level tracks severity & progress – trend very useful<br />

Dropping 30-50% /d = successful Rx – continue<br />

Not dropping or increasing - change Rx, reculture<br />

Decision to stop antibiotics<br />

<br />

Unnecessary Rx is risky for patients and costly<br />

>90% drop from peak or


PCT & ABIOTIC Rx<br />

Brahms’ data: www.procalcitonin.com


OTHER POSSIBLE VALUE<br />

Monitoring patients at high risk<br />

Patients on immunosuppressive therapy<br />

Neonates born after PROM, maternal GpB Strep+ve<br />

Post Surgical & post trauma patients<br />

Reduce need for CRP or Lactate in Sepsis<br />

CRP and lactate are not sepsis specific<br />

Many orders are based on monitoring sepsis<br />

response to treatment which is better done with PCT<br />

TAT for PCT better than CRP – not POC like Lactate


PCT CAVEATS<br />

Not for guiding antibiotic treatment in :<br />

<strong>In</strong>fections: endocarditis, osteomyelitis,<br />

CNS infs, deep-infections, Pseudomonas<br />

pneumonia.<br />

Organisms: Listeria, Legionella, PCP,<br />

Mycobacteria<br />

Immunosuppressed patients


IMPLEMENTATION<br />

3 month evaluation in SI - ICUs & ERs<br />

Reference <strong>In</strong>terval Adults 0.25-0.50 – Bacterial infection likely – rpt 6-24h<br />

>0.50-2.0 – Bacterial infection very likely . Moderate risk<br />

for sepsis<br />

>2.0 – Bacterial infection very likely. High risk for sepsis


CONTENTS<br />

SIRS, SEPSIS, PCT HISTORY & PHYSIOLOGY<br />

ASSAYS & INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

RESULTS OF PCT VERSUS CRP<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTING SERVICE<br />

LESSONS OF THE FIRST 6 MONTHS<br />

OTHER USES


ACCEPTANCE OF TEST<br />

Generally good – some sceptics<br />

Not a silver bullet – better than CRP<br />

NPV and trend most useful of all<br />

Rapid uptake & sustained interest from<br />

ICU & ER<br />

<strong>In</strong>terest from NICU, Surgery & from upisland


ALGORITHM COMPLIANCE<br />

Criteria:<br />

Stop Rx & discharge sooner than Std of Care<br />

Order PCTs per algorithm<br />

Poor compliance with algorithm because:<br />

Decision levels too conservative (low)<br />

Algorithm & comments often conflict<br />

Cerner flags clear, comments not obvious


FALSE RESULTS<br />

False negatives not significant. High NPV<br />

False positives – i.e. not due to bact. inf.<br />

Ac.Pancreatitis, ext. burns, ext. lung damage<br />

Usually 80


NEXT STEPS<br />

Obtain an extension of clinical evaluation<br />

Revise the algorithm(s)<br />

Separate algorithms for ICU and ER<br />

Have regular case oriented discussions<br />

with users<br />

Evaluate the assay in other areas? NICU?


CONTENTS<br />

SIRS, SEPSIS, PCT HISTORY & PHYSIOLOGY<br />

ASSAYS & INITIAL EVALUATION<br />

RESULTS OF PCT VERSUS CRP<br />

IMPLEMENTATION OF TESTING SERVICE<br />

LESSONS OF THE FIRST 6 MONTHS<br />

OTHER USES


NEONATAL SEPSIS<br />

Wealth of literature claims that PCT has<br />

similar value in NICU as in adult ICU<br />

Added value to monitor susceptible<br />

neonates, e.g. low birth weight prems,<br />

PROM cases, maternal GBS+ve<br />

Reference intervals in first 24h a problem


PCT v HRS AFTER BIRTH<br />

Brahms’ data: www.procalcitonin.com


NEONATAL PROJECT<br />

<strong>In</strong>vestigate physiological increase in PCT<br />

Relation to delivery – C/S v Vaginal<br />

Relation to GIT colonization<br />

Look at LBWP infants (


OTHER USES FOR PCT<br />

Prediction of renal disease (5)<br />

parenchymal involvement in pediatric UTIs<br />

Long-term morbidity in pediatric UTIs<br />

<strong>In</strong> vesico-ureteric reflux<br />

Severity of acute pancreatitis (2)<br />

Diagnosis & monitoring of post Sx <strong>In</strong>fs. (9)<br />

As an indicator of survival in the ICU


THANK YOU


KEY REFERENCES<br />

1. Mirjam Christ-Crain et al: Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on<br />

antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections:<br />

cluster randomised, single-blinded intervention trial. Lancet; Feb 21,<br />

2004, 363:600-607<br />

2. Vandack Nobre et al: <strong>Use</strong> of Procalcitonin to Shorten Antibiotic<br />

Treatment Duration in Septic Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2008,<br />

177:498-505<br />

3. Philipp Schuetz et al: Effect of Procalcitonin-Based Guidelines vs<br />

Standard Guidelines on Antibiotic <strong>Use</strong> in Lower Respiratory Tract<br />

<strong>In</strong>fections (ProHOSP). JAMA; Sep 9, 2009, 302(10):1059-1066<br />

4. Jamie N. Deis et al: Procalcitonin as a Marker of Severe Bacterial<br />

<strong>In</strong>fection in Children in the Emergency Department. Ped Emerg Care;<br />

Jan 2010, 26: 51-60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!