04.10.2014 Views

1 GRADUATE COUNCIL MEETING 9 May 2012 102 Kern Graduate ...

1 GRADUATE COUNCIL MEETING 9 May 2012 102 Kern Graduate ...

1 GRADUATE COUNCIL MEETING 9 May 2012 102 Kern Graduate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B7<br />

The membership of doctoral committees should be periodically reviewed by the program chair to<br />

ensure that its members continue to qualify for service on the committee in their designated<br />

roles. For example, if appointments, employment at the University, etc., have changed since<br />

initial appointment to the committee, changes to the committee membership may be necessary. If<br />

changes are warranted, they should be made as soon as possible to prevent future problems that<br />

may delay academic progress for the student (e.g., ability to conduct the comprehensive or final<br />

examinations).<br />

Chair--The chair or at least one co-chair must be a member of the graduate faculty of the<br />

specific doctoral program in which the candidate is enrolled. A retired or emeritus faculty<br />

member may chair a doctoral committee if he/she began chairing the committee prior to<br />

retirement and has the continuing approval of the department head or program chair. The<br />

primary duties of the chair are: (1) to maintain the academic standards of the doctoral program<br />

and the <strong>Graduate</strong> School and assure that all procedures are carried out fairly, (2) to ensure that<br />

the comprehensive and final examinations are conducted in a timely fashion, (3) to arrange and<br />

conduct all meetings, and (4) to ensure that requirements set forth by the committee are<br />

implemented in the final version of the thesis.<br />

Responsibilities of Doctoral Committees--The doctoral committee is responsible for approving<br />

the broad outline of the student’s program and should review the program as soon as possible<br />

after the student’s admission to candidacy. Moreover, continuing communication among the<br />

student, the committee chair, the research supervisor, and the members of the committee is<br />

strongly recommended, to preclude misunderstandings and to develop a collegial relation<br />

between the candidate and the committee.<br />

Doctoral Examination--The (entire) committee will prepare and administer the examination,<br />

and evaluate the candidate’s performance on the examination. If a committee member is unable<br />

to attend the final oral defense, the member may sign as a special signatory. A revised committee<br />

appointment form will need to be sent to the Office of <strong>Graduate</strong> Enrollment Services, 114 <strong>Kern</strong><br />

Building, removing the faculty member as a regular committee member and if it is desired to<br />

designate that individual as a special signatory, a memo must accompany the revised committee<br />

form, requesting that the faculty member be moved to a special signatory. If there are then not<br />

enough members serving on the committee (i.e., four or more active members of the <strong>Graduate</strong><br />

Faculty) another Penn State faculty member will need to replace that member to constitute a<br />

legitimate doctoral committee. (Substitutes are not permitted.) These changes and approvals shall<br />

occur before the actual examination takes place. The department or program head will notify the<br />

Office of <strong>Graduate</strong> Enrollment Services, providing two weeks' notice, when the candidate is<br />

ready to schedule the comprehensive and the final oral examinations and will report the results of<br />

these examinations to that office.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!