03.10.2014 Views

Dilip A. Shah - American Society for Quality

Dilip A. Shah - American Society for Quality

Dilip A. Shah - American Society for Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MQD Page 10<br />

(Continued from page 9)<br />

What did he do that has resulted in vast importance in today’s Metrology?<br />

Who is the only Slav <strong>for</strong> which a measurement quantity is named? For what is he famous?<br />

Which measurement quantity is named <strong>for</strong> him? Define that quantity.<br />

Dynamic electrons have a mass of 5.7 x 10-¹²Kg/amp/sec=1 coulomb=6.29145 x 10^18 electrons.<br />

How long will it take to amass an electron mass of 1Kg?<br />

(A full step-by-step mathematic protocol is required here)<br />

What is Current Density? In what units is it normally expressed? In what units is Linear<br />

Current Density normally expressed? Where and what processes are these measurements<br />

critical?<br />

How much power (in Watts) does it take to cook a hot dog?<br />

(Caution: The correct answer to this question is independent of the mass of the sausage or its physical<br />

dimensions.)<br />

Describe how you would calibrate a leak detector? Enumerate all of the materials and/or devices<br />

used in that procedure.<br />

What is the principal constituent of Acid Rain?<br />

In the US Customary System a Cupful is standardized as 8 ounces. What is the equivalent in<br />

the Culinary System (i.e. Tea Spoonsful, etc.? What is the same equivalent in the S.I. System?<br />

In 1977 the International Electro-Technical Commission (IEC) issued IEC Publication #469-1<br />

internationally standardizing many Time Domain technology terms hitherto <strong>for</strong>e used colloquially<br />

and imprecisely. A few of these archaic terms are: Risetime; Falltime; Pulse Width;<br />

and Pulse Height. State the now internationally agreed upon term <strong>for</strong> each of these features<br />

and the rational <strong>for</strong> the new designation.<br />

After the answers have been evaluated and the awards made, I will publish Dr. Watson’s answers in this<br />

column (September issue).<br />

The Measurement Science Conference <strong>for</strong> this year has come and gone and you Boss were not there—<br />

we missed you. It was nice to see <strong>Dilip</strong> get the Woodington Award. Personally I was not so happy with<br />

the venue—too much walking <strong>for</strong> my worn out knees. I understand that it will be there in Pasadena<br />

again next year and then back to Anaheim again.<br />

Well Boss I think that wraps it up <strong>for</strong> this issue. Let us hope that cash <strong>for</strong> correct answers will result in<br />

more response from our readers, please let me know whatever you may hear.<br />

Phil Painchaud<br />

1110 West Dorothy Drive<br />

Brea, CA 92821-2017<br />

Phone: 1-714-529-6604<br />

FAX: 1-714-529-1109<br />

E-Mail: painchaud4@cs.com or olepappy@juno.com<br />

Vol. 24, No. 2 The Newsletter of the Measurement <strong>Quality</strong> Division, <strong>American</strong> <strong>Society</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> June 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!