02.10.2014 Views

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VII. 1997<br />

January - March<br />

The new year began optimistically with the issue <strong>of</strong> copyright for The Evaluation Tool finally<br />

resolved. OCC had written agreement from MET to sell The Evaluation Tool for a period <strong>of</strong> two<br />

years, from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 1998. This tool, now renamed The Evaluator, was<br />

in its final design stage and was to be presented by the end <strong>of</strong> the month for final review.<br />

Advertising for The Evaluator had been ongoing during its development stage and OCC was<br />

now keeping a list <strong>of</strong> potential orders.<br />

A list <strong>of</strong> potential commercial and corporate buyers for the learning materials was also being<br />

developed, and the decision was made to hire a member <strong>of</strong> the former Evaluation Team on<br />

secondment to set up a review team which would review all materials and develop and deliver<br />

training programs. Early feedback indicated that many <strong>of</strong> the materials in the catalogue did not<br />

meet the evaluation criteria and were thus unacceptable. It was suggested that OCC’s efforts to<br />

establish product endorsement could be assisted by providing developers with specific criteria<br />

before products were submitted to OCC for review.<br />

The first steps toward revision <strong>of</strong> OCC’s policies and by-laws were also taken in January. These<br />

changes were necessary to fulfill the new legal status <strong>of</strong> incorporation, and it was agreed that<br />

subsequent updates would be initiated over time as needed. Amongst the changes addressed was<br />

a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest clause specifying the parameters <strong>of</strong> directors’ responsibilities to OCC, a<br />

concern raised in 1996. Also <strong>of</strong> relevance was the change in voting status for Ministry<br />

representatives now that OCC was incorporated. Although MET representatives were now no<br />

longer able to vote or chair committees, their physical presence on the Board was actively<br />

encouraged in an attempt to maintain strong relationships with the Ministry.<br />

Funding, however, remained the main agenda <strong>of</strong> the new year. OCC’s three-year funding<br />

agreement with MET and OPSBA was coming to an end on 31 March 1997. A business plan<br />

presentation to MET <strong>of</strong>ficials was scheduled for February, with OCC’s financial requirements<br />

from MET rationalized in detail and forecast to the year 2001. Included in this plan was the idea<br />

that OCC would take over ownership <strong>of</strong> assets from OPSBA.<br />

Initial response to the presentation was very positive. Ministry <strong>of</strong>ficials were favourable towards<br />

the idea <strong>of</strong> seeking private sector partnerships and suggested that, in future, representatives <strong>of</strong><br />

the private sector should be included on the OCC board and more actively involved in OCC.<br />

The Ministry also liked the idea <strong>of</strong> using revenues for merit awards and for funding the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> learning resources in schools and boards, thus focusing on more grassroots<br />

development. Questions were raised about the process (e.g., electronic “connectivity”) by which<br />

OCC could work with other organizations and consortia, and stronger connections with ILC<br />

were encouraged. This last point came out <strong>of</strong> MET’s ongoing concern for more connectivity<br />

©2008 Curriculum Services Canada 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!