02.10.2014 Views

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1995-1996<br />

In a meeting on 8 January 1996, the evaluation tool draft was submitted, together with a<br />

three-year business plan, to Ministry personnel—ADMs Mariette Carrier-Fraser and Jill<br />

Hutcheon, as well as Pauline Laing, Director <strong>of</strong> the Ministry’s Curriculum Branch, and<br />

Gerry McIntryre, Manager, Elementary Education, Curriculum Branch. The business plan<br />

called for a $350,000 investment from MET for 1996-97, rather than $500,000 as in the<br />

current year. Despite this, it was made clear that OCC’s support might well be cut<br />

altogether since that support depended on a fund <strong>of</strong> money that was itself in jeopardy. Still,<br />

the tone <strong>of</strong> the meeting was generally positive and MET personnel carefully examined all <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed activities and outcomes for the coming three years.<br />

Among those proposals were several that would not come to pass, at least not within three<br />

years, but which articulated the thinking <strong>of</strong> the OCC Work Group. They included:<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> a plan to become a distribution centre for <strong>curriculum</strong><br />

resource materials (MET was especially interested in the potential for this to<br />

save time and money at the board level)<br />

• Co-ordination and alignment <strong>of</strong> already existing resource agencies for “onestop<br />

shopping”<br />

• Enhancements to the database and all versions <strong>of</strong> the catalogue, e.g., adding<br />

full text or samples <strong>of</strong> documents.<br />

•<br />

While these would not be realized, several proposed initiatives– to provide access via the<br />

World Wide Web (www), to expand the catalogue to include senior grades, to list materials<br />

from a broader range <strong>of</strong> sources, to become self-sustaining 16 —would succeed.<br />

The first <strong>of</strong> these initiatives was put on the road to completion just four days later. On the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Executive Director, the Work Group contracted with ONTERIS to<br />

produce a graphical user interface (GUI) through which web users could access and view<br />

the catalogue information stored in OCC’s STAR database. This would require a search<br />

mechanism, the selection <strong>of</strong> appropriate display fields, and the development <strong>of</strong> a format in<br />

which to present the information. In addition, a new database was commissioned to accept<br />

teachers’ comments and link them to the relevant resources in the main database. Eric Lee <strong>of</strong><br />

ONTERIS, who had built the main database, would be responsible for most <strong>of</strong> the work on<br />

these new projects.<br />

Two other important events occurred in January. The first was the launch <strong>of</strong> the JK-9<br />

Catalogue. 17 This colourful edition was enhanced with teacher comments on the use <strong>of</strong><br />

materials that had appeared in the Transition Years catalogue. At the same time, the<br />

FileMaker Pro for Windows version <strong>of</strong> the Phase I catalogue was finally completed and<br />

distributed. (Both the Windows and Mac versions <strong>of</strong> the JK-6 Catalogue were ready for<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> February and the ONeducation CD-ROM, with CFORP as a new partner, was<br />

completed for 1May. It included the OCC Catalogue in both FileMaker Pro and DOS<br />

©2008 Curriculum Services Canada 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!