02.10.2014 Views

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

a history of curriculum services canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

III. 1994<br />

The Work Group lost no time in moving ahead. The new year brought with it a preliminary<br />

decision to contract with ONTERIS for data entry and an exportable Dbase file.<br />

Staffing was the group’s next initiative. Job descriptions for a "Clearinghouse Co-ordinator"<br />

and an "administrative assistant" were finalized and advertising options discussed. A selection<br />

team was appointed and application forms, advertising copy, advertising venues, and guidelines<br />

for recruiting, interviewing and selecting candidates were proposed.<br />

With a Co-ordinator soon to be hired, the Work Group determined that the time was right to<br />

shift its primary focus to policy making. Its first directives, issued in a February 1 policy<br />

statement, were that “only the best material” should be included in the catalogue and that the<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> all the stakeholders should be addressed.<br />

Meanwhile, OPSBA was chosen as the not-for-pr<strong>of</strong>it project "banker" to receive transfer<br />

payments from the Ministry and to administer the project's funds under the direction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Work Group. Peter Brown, <strong>of</strong> Corporate Services and Accounts, was invited to address the<br />

Work Group on the Ministry’s position. He advised that MET would try to keep the project in a<br />

positive cash flow position, that accountability mechanisms were key, and that the project<br />

should request its funds in phases, as needed. If they believed their work should extend into the<br />

future, a business plan would be required before current funding ran out. It should include<br />

potential cost savings to boards and strategies to address long-term costs. He also stressed the<br />

need to keep the Ministry fully informed about the progress <strong>of</strong> the project at all times.<br />

With February came good news. The Toronto Board <strong>of</strong> Education was interested in listing its<br />

materials in the catalogue. The clearinghouse had its first indication <strong>of</strong> potential buy-in! The<br />

Work Group now began in earnest to address the logistics <strong>of</strong> soliciting, receiving, and<br />

processing materials.<br />

Further consideration was given to how publishers might become involved with the<br />

clearinghouse. However, in March 1994, the Canadian Book Publishers' Council - School<br />

Group formalized its opposition to the project. While the Council supported sharing "best<br />

practice" teaching strategies among boards, it felt that the clearinghouse was redundant.<br />

ONTERIS already had a database <strong>of</strong> materials, some <strong>of</strong> which were published, together with the<br />

C-14 list, on OTF's Electronic Village, which served the entire province. In addition, the<br />

Council reiterated its concern about the circumvention <strong>of</strong> the C-14 process and the potential for<br />

copyright infringement.<br />

On March 24, while this situation was developing, the selection/interview team recommended to<br />

the newly dubbed "Ontario Curriculum Clearinghouse" (OCC) Work Group that Susan Langley<br />

be appointed as Co-ordinator (seconded from the Peel Board), effective 15 April 1994 to 30<br />

June 1995. A press release would announce her acceptance. At the same meeting, the Policies<br />

©2008 Curriculum Services Canada 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!