02.10.2014 Views

Safe Futures A Plan for Program Improvement - Department of ...

Safe Futures A Plan for Program Improvement - Department of ...

Safe Futures A Plan for Program Improvement - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 rd Quarter Georgia Reply: See 3 rd Quarter Report.<br />

D7 ACTION STEPS: Examine the present review system <strong>for</strong> children in care to determine the optimum frequency <strong>of</strong> reviews needed<br />

<strong>for</strong> expediting permanency.<br />

START<br />

DATE<br />

COMPLETION<br />

DATE<br />

RESPONSIBLE<br />

PERSON(S)<br />

MEASURABLE<br />

BENCHMARKS<br />

Jan. 2002 Nov. 2002 Linda Doster, TA: Michelle Barclay A decision will be made whether to change if necessary to<br />

ensure a review occurs every 3 months.<br />

Evaluation: Georgia's CIP will evaluate a sample <strong>of</strong> court<br />

case files annually to see if more frequent hearings lead to<br />

faster permanency.<br />

ACCOMPLISHMENTS:<br />

1 st and 2 nd Quarter Reports: Achieved. During the summer <strong>of</strong> 2002, court case file reviews were done <strong>of</strong> nine counties across<br />

Georgia. The judges and staff <strong>of</strong> those courts were either interviewed or surveyed regarding caseload and resource allocation. In<br />

addition, 70 court-hearing observations were done. The data from this work was collected in a database and shared with the National<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Juvenile and Family Court Judges Permanency <strong>Plan</strong>ning <strong>Department</strong>. From the initial report and the sample <strong>of</strong> data,<br />

reviews are occurring more <strong>of</strong>ten than every six months. From the snapshot <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation collected, having more frequent reviews<br />

did not appear to effect time to permanency. More data will need to be collected in order to draw firm conclusions.<br />

3 rd Quarter Report: Achieved.<br />

3 rd Quarter Federal Response: Did you conduct a review this summer? Have you made a determination? When do you plan to<br />

collect more data?<br />

4th Quarter Georgia Reply: A subsequent review was conducted during the summer <strong>of</strong> 2003. The data collected from that study is<br />

presently being analyzed by the National Council <strong>of</strong> Juvenile and Family Court Judges; however, preliminary indications suggest that<br />

although hearings are occurring more frequently, the increased frequency does not appear to increase time to permanency.<br />

4 th Quarter Federal Response: This step is also noted as achieved but the State does not provide any in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> reviews. From the 4 th QR narrative, it does not appear that this step will be achieved until the data analysis is completed<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>Safe</strong> <strong>Futures</strong> – A <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Program</strong> <strong>Improvement</strong><br />

Georgia <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Human Resources<br />

March, 2004 Quarter 5 - Work <strong>Plan</strong> D Page 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!