an overview georgia program improvement plan - Department of ...
an overview georgia program improvement plan - Department of ...
an overview georgia program improvement plan - Department of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6 th Quarter Federal Response: The relev<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> perm<strong>an</strong>ency goals by type is unclear. Either the State is including<br />
perm<strong>an</strong>ency goals for children in closed cases or there is some other expl<strong>an</strong>ation as to the signific<strong>an</strong>t difference between the State's<br />
AFCARS reporting (see below) <strong>an</strong>d the 16 000 case pl<strong>an</strong>s.<br />
Children in care on the first day <strong>of</strong> the year:<br />
2002: 12, 812<br />
2003: 12, 986 (preliminary)<br />
7 th Quarter Report: Achieved - The adoption checklist is a part <strong>of</strong> CPRS. Effective April 2004, the adoption checklist now has a<br />
link in the main navigational toolbar, which makes it much easier to find. Workers are introduced to the checklist during New Worker<br />
Training. Supervisors are receiving instruction in regional supervisors meetings statewide - on the import<strong>an</strong>ce <strong>of</strong> using the checklist to<br />
improve outcomes for children through timely finalization <strong>of</strong> adoption. The courts have agreed that the tool is helpful, <strong>an</strong>d the judges<br />
have been encouraged to request workers to utilize the checklist for <strong>an</strong>y case with a TPR.<br />
The ACF 6th quarter response points out a discrep<strong>an</strong>cy <strong>of</strong> the numbers between CPRS <strong>an</strong>d IDS. IDS is the <strong>of</strong>ficial reporting system<br />
for AFCARS information. The number <strong>of</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>s in CPRS is higher due to several factors. During the migration <strong>of</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>s from the<br />
original CPRS to CPRSv2, duplicate cases were created. The counties were not aware that they needed to close the original pl<strong>an</strong>, so<br />
the duplicate pl<strong>an</strong>s remain. Other pl<strong>an</strong>s should have been closed when their case was closed. The Division is now providing training<br />
to supervisors on how to identify pl<strong>an</strong>s that need to be closed <strong>an</strong>d how to close them. Additionally, supervisors <strong>an</strong>d workers are<br />
receiving training on how to create a new pl<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d review existing pl<strong>an</strong>s. The developer for the system will review the system for<br />
“junk pl<strong>an</strong>s” <strong>an</strong>d delete as appropriate.<br />
8 th Quarter Report: Achieved. In every training opportunity, including new worker training, veter<strong>an</strong> worker training, regional<br />
supervisory training <strong>an</strong>d statewide conferences, the CPRS adoption checklist has been introduced, reviewed, <strong>an</strong>d staff are encouraged<br />
to use this feature when TPR or voluntary surrender is realized. The “Prompt” is functioning as designed. The usage should increase<br />
as workers achieved TPR or VS on new children. For m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>of</strong> the children who are free for adoption <strong>an</strong>d have been in the system for<br />
some time, case m<strong>an</strong>agers are not required to use the checklist because the older cases were “gr<strong>an</strong>dfathered” into the system. As<br />
mentioned in the 3 rd quarter report, the prototype was piloted in Dekalb County <strong>an</strong>d was implemented statewide.<br />
To address the data discrep<strong>an</strong>cy discussed in the 7 th quarterly report, on October 22, State DFCS received the list <strong>of</strong> cases in CPRS<br />
that do not match <strong>an</strong> open case in IDS. After reviewing the list, the project administrator was able to determine several causes for the<br />
unmatched cases, which include: 1. Child's name is entered one way in CPRS <strong>an</strong>d a different way in IDS. 2. Case number is either<br />
missing from CPRS or is a different format from IDS. 2. Cases where there is more th<strong>an</strong> one draft pl<strong>an</strong> for each child, because the<br />
worker had a problem <strong>an</strong>d started over without completing the first pl<strong>an</strong>. 3. Cases where there is more th<strong>an</strong> one draft pl<strong>an</strong> for each<br />
Safe Futures – A Pl<strong>an</strong> for Program Improvement<br />
Georgia <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hum<strong>an</strong> Resources<br />
November, 2004 Quarter 8 - Work Pl<strong>an</strong> E Page 9