an overview georgia program improvement plan - Department of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

# of Differences 29 73 9 % of Children With Differences 28% 9% 38% Quarter 4 No. of Unique Children 108 866 32 # of Differences 31 134 11 % of Children With Differences 29% 15% 34% Table II gives the instances of the number of moves in COSTAR that were greater than AFCARS. Table II COSTAR GREATER THAN AFCARS COUNTY Quarter of FFY 2003 CARROLL FULTON TOOMBS Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 # of Differences 35 124 11 COSTAR Moves > AFCARS 25 95 9 # of Differences 32 100 13 COSTAR Moves > AFCARS 15 66 10 # of Differences 29 71 9 COSTAR Moves > AFCARS 1 57 5 Safe Futures – A Plan for Program Improvement Georgia Department of Human Resources November, 2004 Quarter 8 - Work Plan C Page 8
Quarter 4 # of Differences 31 134 11 COSTAR Moves > AFCARS 17 122 7 Unique Children in Care 12 Months or Less In order to make comparisons with the federal measure on stability the three county study of children population from COSTAR and AFCARS was further refined selecting only those children with 2 or less placement moves and in care 12 months or less. The total number of children in FFY 2003 in Carroll, Fulton, and Toombs counties who had been in care less than 12 months with 2 or less placements was 625 unique children. Carroll County produced 52 matches with the COSTAR database. Thirty-one (60%) children had the same number of moves in both data systems. In 13 (25%) cases, the number of COSTAR moves exceeded the number of AFCARS moves. Fulton County produced 544 matches with the COSTAR database. Four hundred five (74%) of these children had the same number of moves in both data systems. In 117 cases (22%), the number of COSTAR moves exceeded the number of AFCARS moves. Finally, Toombs County had only 29 matches between the COSTAR and AFCARS databases. Sixteen of the children (55%) were the same in both systems. In 8 cases (28%), the number of COSTAR moves exceeded the number of AFCARS moves. The total number of children with equivalent moves was 452 (72%). The number of children who had more moves in COSTAR than AFCARS was 138 (22%). There were 35 children (6%) who had more moves recorded in AFCARS than COSTAR. Analysis of the AFCARS moves are greater than COSTAR moves can be explained to some degree by procedures inherent to federal definitions of a move and the data captured in the COSTAR system. In AFCARS, a move is added when a child is transferred to any non per diem relative placement. This move would not be recorded in COSTAR. AFCARS current functionality indicates a move when a child’s placement setting changes to Pre-Adoptive. However, this change should be counted only when the child’s physical setting changes, not if the child’s foster home becomes the pre-adoptive placement. There is a possibility that placement change is recorded in AFCARS for respite care. Federal AFCARS regulations exclude respite care from the count of placements. SUMMARY OF COMPARISON RELATED TO ISSUES OF STABILITY Comparison of data related to Stability of foster care placements points to the need to clarify with county DFCS staff policies and procedures regarding placement moves. Emphasis should be placed on consistency of the data entered into the AFCARS and COSTAR systems and updating all data with every placement in AFCARS. A change in the AFCARS query from the IDS system should be made so as to exclude counting a move when a child’s placement type is changed to Pre-Adoptive home yet the child remains in the same physical placement. Qualitative Review of Fulton, Carroll and Toombs County DFCS Safe Futures – A Plan for Program Improvement Georgia Department of Human Resources November, 2004 Quarter 8 - Work Plan C Page 9
Page 1 and 2: AN OVERVIEW GEORGIA PROGRAM IMPROVE
Page 3 and 4: Georgia: Georgia’s Program Improv
Page 5 and 6: The AFCARS data for this indicator
Page 7 and 8: Developed standards of measurement
Page 9 and 10: These action steps were included as
Page 11 and 12: Used the results obtained from the
Page 13 and 14: Established more flexible hours and
Page 15 and 16: policy require that the case manage
Page 17 and 18: Training initiative for DFCS and DP
Page 19 and 20: 4. In addition to the information b
Page 21 and 22: Stakeholder Input in the Analysis o
Page 23 and 24: The stakeholder interviews held dur
Page 25 and 26: Work Plan Detail A -- Item 2, Repea
Page 27 and 28: What needs to be accomplished: Writ
Page 29 and 30: Neglect was determined to be the mo
Page 31 and 32: 1 st Quarter Federal Response: (PLE
Page 33 and 34: Safe Futures - A Plan for Program I
Page 35 and 36: ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Data from these co
Page 37 and 38: • 79% of respondents agreed commu
Page 39 and 40: Federal HIPAA requirements limit wh
Page 41 and 42: 6 th Quarter Report: Funding for th
Page 43 and 44: Work Plan Detail C -- Item 6, Stabi
Page 45 and 46: START COMPLETION RESPONSIBLE MEASUR
Page 47 and 48: 3 rd Quarter Report Georgia's Reply
Page 49: COSTAR children were selected from
Page 53 and 54: DATE DATE PERSON(S) BENCHMARKS July
Page 55 and 56: C16 ACTION STEPS: Analyze a sample
Page 57 and 58: October 2004 Purpose and Design The
Page 59 and 60: The researcher first analyzed chara
Page 61 and 62: Characteristic Percent Percent Perc
Page 63 and 64: • Mr. and Mrs. Marshall (pseudony
Page 65 and 66: 3 rd Quarter Report Georgia's Reply
Page 67 and 68: ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 1 st and 2 nd Quar
Page 69 and 70: 8 th Quarter DOCUMENTATION: (1) Soc
Page 71 and 72: 5 th Quarter DOCUMENTATION: PIP Res
Page 73 and 74: D6 ACTION STEPS: START DATE Mar. 20
Page 75 and 76: Georgia Juvenile Court Judges) is a
Page 77 and 78: addition, 70 court-hearing observat
Page 79 and 80: (2) Key Performance Indicators and
Page 81 and 82: DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED 3 RD Quarter
Page 83 and 84: adoptive families, there was an inc
Page 85 and 86: 8 th Quarter Report: Achieved 5 th
Page 87 and 88: 6 th Quarter Federal Response: E4:
Page 89 and 90: 5 th Quarter DCOUMENTATION: Reporti
Page 91 and 92: statewide. Both panel and court rev
Page 93 and 94: child, because the worker was not a
Page 95 and 96: Question 1. Are you seeing the adop
Page 97 and 98: 6 th Quarter Federal Response: 6 th
Page 99 and 100: for the barrier identified. These r
Page 101 and 102:
eports. The AFCARS reporting and ma
Page 103 and 104:
8 th Quarter Report: Prior to the b
Page 105 and 106:
BARRIERS TO ACHIEVEMENT: E27 ACTION
Page 107 and 108:
Work Plan Detail F -- Item 10, Perm
Page 109 and 110:
Safe Futures - A Plan for Program I
Page 111 and 112:
DOCUMENTATION: Please see attachmen
Page 113 and 114:
together. Relative Care Subsidy (RC
Page 115 and 116:
START DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSI
Page 117 and 118:
continue to assess our data sources
Page 119 and 120:
Length of time as a foster parent #
Page 121 and 122:
Table 4 Disruptions and use of resp
Page 123 and 124:
2. More respite care providers 3. E
Page 125 and 126:
Work Plan Detail H -- Item 13, Visi
Page 127 and 128:
Please refer to the following attac
Page 129 and 130:
(See attached copy of Memorandum fr
Page 131 and 132:
July 2002 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Dec. 200
Page 133 and 134:
A pilot is being conducted in Dekal
Page 135 and 136:
5 th Quarter Report: At least 100 c
Page 137 and 138:
2004. ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 1 st Quarter
Page 139 and 140:
8 th Quarter Report: Partially Achi
Page 141 and 142:
state office on the number of asses
Page 143 and 144:
the Division. The review should be
Page 145 and 146:
The report referred to in the Bench
Page 147 and 148:
of that evaluation has been dissemi
Page 149 and 150:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 1 st and 2nd Quart
Page 151 and 152:
understanding of this content on a
Page 153 and 154:
Course Module Content of question A
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
4 th Quarter Report: A survey asses
Page 165 and 166:
April 2002 Aug. 2002 5th Quarter: P
Page 167 and 168:
equested an extension to July 2004
Page 169 and 170:
where the cases are no longer activ
Page 171 and 172:
7 th Quarter Report: In response to
Page 173 and 174:
7 th Quarter DOCUMENTATION: (Same a
Page 175 and 176:
Safe Future - A Plan for Program Im
Page 177 and 178:
Safe Futures - A Plan for Program I
Page 179 and 180:
Work Plan Detail N -- Item 22, Phys
Page 181 and 182:
Held within 30 - 60 days of a child
Page 183 and 184:
ACCOMPLISHMENTS: enhancements of th
Page 185 and 186:
6 th Quarter Report: The introducti
Page 187 and 188:
Placement/Best Placement Providers
Page 189 and 190:
this benchmark with county supervis
Page 191 and 192:
BARRIERS TO ACHIEVEMENT: N7 ACTION
Page 193 and 194:
eports were discontinued. The Georg
Page 195 and 196:
to initiate the reviews. 5th Quarte
Page 197 and 198:
March 2004 QCR 16 county offices (t
Page 199 and 200:
A cumulative Qualitative Case Revie
Page 201 and 202:
5 th Quarter Report: Since, the QCR
Page 203 and 204:
6 th Quarter Report: A review of th
Page 205 and 206:
There has been a steady increase in
Page 207 and 208:
1 st Quarter Report: The Case Plan
Page 209 and 210:
To date CPRS reports that 10,274 ca
Page 211 and 212:
2 nd Quarter Report: Accomplishing
Page 213 and 214:
5 th Quarter Report: HIPPA issues h
Page 215 and 216:
Goal: Case managers have the capaci
Page 217 and 218:
8 th Quarter Report: Achieved. The
Page 219 and 220:
esources as well as increased capac
Page 221 and 222:
Review instruments address document
Page 223 and 224:
A comprehensive effort to clean up
Page 225 and 226:
Work Plan Detail Q -- Items 35-37,
Page 227 and 228:
Funding and Resource Allocation to
Page 229 and 230:
1 st Quarter Response: In May of 20
Page 231 and 232:
conduct of the Comprehensive Child
Page 233 and 234:
Seventy-five new workers were train
Page 235 and 236:
Work Plan Detail R -- Item 42, The
show all

an overview georgia program improvement plan - Department of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?