FY2013 Official Budget - Austin ISD
FY2013 Official Budget - Austin ISD
FY2013 Official Budget - Austin ISD
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Governmental Funds Adopted August 28, 2012<br />
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
<strong>Austin</strong>, TX - Travis County<br />
OFFICIAL BUDGET<br />
1111 West Sixth Street<br />
<strong>Austin</strong>, TX 787073<br />
512.414.1700<br />
www.austinisd.org
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Table of Contents<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Awards and Acknowledgements<br />
ASBO-Meritorious <strong>Budget</strong> Award for Excellence in <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation<br />
GFOA-Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation Award<br />
Texas Comptroller Gold Leadership Circle Award<br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Introduction………………….………………………………….…………………………………………………… 1<br />
Organization…………………………………..……………………………………..……………………………… 73<br />
Financial………………………..…………………………………………….……………………………………… 117<br />
Informational………………………………...………….…………….…...…….………………………………… 367<br />
Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 471<br />
Mission Statement…………..…………………………………………….…………………………………………<br />
i<br />
Introduction<br />
District Address and <strong>Official</strong>s …………..…………………………………………….…………………………… 1<br />
Executive Summary…………………………………...…………………….……………………………………… 2<br />
Strategic Plan Framework……………………………………………………………………………………. 4<br />
Facts about <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District….……..……………………………………………………… 5<br />
Academic Programs…………….….………………………………...……………………………………………… 7<br />
Academic Ratings………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8<br />
Academic Assessment & Accountability………….….……..…………………………………………………… 9<br />
Financial Accountability………………………………………………………………………………………… 19<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Policies & Development Procedures………………………………………………………………… 21<br />
Milestones of the <strong>Budget</strong> Process………………………………………………………………………………… 22<br />
Board Goals………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23<br />
Financial Structure & Basis for Accounting………………………………………………………………….. 24<br />
Account Code Structure………………………………………………………………………………………… 25<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Challenges…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 30<br />
Major Funds…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 32<br />
Governmental Funds………………………………………………………………………………………………. 33<br />
General Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 37<br />
Tax Rates……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 46<br />
Property Values……………………………………………………...…….……………………………………….. 49<br />
Food Service Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………....… 56<br />
Debt Service Fund………………………………………………………………………………………….………… 58<br />
Capital Projects Fund………………………………………………………………………………………………… 60<br />
Grant Funds…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 62<br />
Enrollment Growth…………..….......………..…………………………………………………….….....………… 66<br />
Staffing………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 67<br />
Salaries & Benefits…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 68<br />
Future Year <strong>Budget</strong> Projections…..…….…………………………………………….….………………………… 68<br />
Summary……...………………………………………………………....…………………………………………… 71
Table of Contents<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Organization<br />
School Districts in the Surrounding Area………………..………………………………………………………… 73<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> - District Boundaries………….………………………………………………………………………… 74<br />
Overview of <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District……….……....………………………………………………… 75<br />
Campus Listing……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 76<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Calendar for <strong>FY2013</strong>……………..…………………………………………………………………..… 80<br />
Organizational Structure……………..………...………………………………..…..……………...……………… 81<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Organizational Chart………………........………............………………………...…………..……… 82<br />
Fund Structure Diagram…………………………………………………………….……………………………… 84<br />
Financial Structure and Basis for Accounting…...….……....…...……………………………………………… 85<br />
Account Code Structure……………………..……….……………………………………………………………… 92<br />
Fund Codes…………………………………………….……………………………………………………… 93<br />
Function Codes………………………………………...……………………………………………………… 96<br />
Revenue Object Codes…...…………….……...…………………..………………………………………… 99<br />
Expenditure Object Codes………….…...….…………….………………………………………………… 100<br />
Function/Program Intent Code Matrix……………………………………………………………………… 103<br />
Significant Financial Policies & Procedures…………………..…….…………………………………………… 104<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Policies & Development Procedures…………………….…………….………………………………… 108<br />
Board Goals, Strategies to Achieve Goals, and <strong>Budget</strong> Parameters…………………………………………. 110<br />
Strategic Plan Framework…………………………………………………………………………………………… 111<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Development Process………………...……………….…………………………………………………… 112<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Administration and Management Process………………………………………...……………………… 114<br />
Financial<br />
Financial Overview………………………………………………………………..………………………………… 117<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 118<br />
Governmental Funds……………………..……….………………………………………………………………… 118<br />
General Fund ……………………………………………..………………………………………………………… 128<br />
Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions…………………………………………………………………… 133<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Five Year Comparison……… 137<br />
General Fund Campus Information………..……………………………………………………………....… 147<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> High Schools……………………………………………………………………………………… 149<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Middle Schools…….....…………………………………………………………………………… 168<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Elementary Schools…………………………………………………………….………………… 187<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Special Campuses…..….....…………………………………………………………………… 272<br />
General Fund Departmental Non-Campus Information…..…..….……………………………………… 279<br />
Food Service………………….……..…………………………..…..…..………………………………………...… 338<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Five Year Comparison……… 339<br />
Debt Service …….…….……………………………………………………………………..............………...…… 341<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance-Five Year Comparison……… 342<br />
Debt Service Policy-CCA (Legal)…………………………...…..….………………………………………. 345<br />
Capital Projects……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 347<br />
2008 Bond Proposition Detail………………………………………………………………………………… 348<br />
Grant Funds…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 358<br />
Proprietary Funds…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 364
Informational<br />
Taxable Value Information………………………………………………………………………………………… 367<br />
Impact of Tax Levy on Single Family Residence………………………………………………………………… 374<br />
Student Information………………………………………………………………………………………………… 376<br />
Staffing………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 382<br />
Future Year <strong>Budget</strong> Projections…………………………………………………………………………………… 385<br />
Buildings and Square Footage……………………………………………………………………………………… 388<br />
Benchmarks…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 392<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Comparison with Local Peer Group Districts………………………………………………………… 393<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Comparison with Urban Peer Group Districts………………………………………………………… 399<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Comparison with the State of Texas…………………………………………………………………… 405<br />
Financial Allocation Study for Texas (FAST)……………………………………………………………………… 411<br />
Food Services………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 423<br />
Transportation………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 426<br />
Risk Management…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 427<br />
Academic Programs……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 428<br />
Accountability Indicators…………………………………………………………………………………………… 433<br />
Academic Assessment and Accountability………………………………………………………………………… 434<br />
Accomplishments…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 445<br />
Demographical and Statistical……………………………………………………………………………………… 466<br />
Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 471
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
List of Tables<br />
Introduction<br />
Table 1 Student Ethnicity Percentages for <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>……………………………………….……… 6<br />
Table 2 2011 TAKS and 2012 STAAR (TAKS Equivalent) Results Grade 3-8 by Group………… 10<br />
Table 3 2012 STAAR EOC Results for Texas Big-8 School Districts……………………………… 11<br />
Table 4 2012 STAAR Average Percentage of Questions Answered Correctly Grades 3-8……… 11<br />
Table 5 2011-2012 Preliminary AYP for Texas Big-8 School Districts……………………………… 12<br />
Table 6 2010-2012 SAT Results - District Averages by Group……………………………………… 13<br />
Table 7 2010-2012 ACT Results - District Averages by Group……………………………………… 13<br />
Table 8 2011 Operating Expenditures per Pupil……………………………………………………. 15<br />
Table 9 2011 Percent of fourth graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP mathematics……… 16<br />
Table 10 2011 Percent of eight graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP mathematics………… 17<br />
Table 11 2011 Percent of fourth graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP reading……………… 18<br />
Table 12 2011 Percent of eight graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP reading……………… 18<br />
Table 13 General Fund - Fund Balance (In Millions)………………………………………………….. 20<br />
Table 14 Milestones of the <strong>Budget</strong> Process…………………………………………………………… 22<br />
Table 15 Board Goals, Strategies to Achieve Goals and <strong>Budget</strong> Parameters……………………… 23<br />
Table 16 Savings from Cuts, Cost Avoidance and Revenue Measures……………………………… 28<br />
Table 17 Major Funds……………………………………………………………………………………… 32<br />
Table 18 Major Funds - Pie Chart………………………………………………………………………… 33<br />
Table 19 General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function and Changes in<br />
Fund Balance…………………………………………………………………………………… 34<br />
Table 20 Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> for Three Primary Funds and Recapture……………………………… 35<br />
Table 21 Recapture Payments Compared to General Fund Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong>…………………… 36<br />
Table 22 Funding Sources <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data from Prior Year…………………….. 38<br />
Table 23 General Fund Revenue Sources……………………………………………………………… 38<br />
Table 24 Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures from FY2012 to <strong>FY2013</strong>……… 43<br />
Table 25 <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> & Tax Rate for M&O and I&S…………………………………. 46<br />
Table 26 Tax Rate History……………………………………………………………………………….. 47<br />
Table 27 Analysis of Tax Burden………………………………………………………………………… 48<br />
Table 28 FY2012 Central Texas School District Property Tax Rates………………………………… 49<br />
Table 29 Net Taxable Value Projection…………………………………………………………………… 50<br />
Table 30 Total Tax Levy…………………………………………………………………………………… 51<br />
Table 31 Schedule for Certification of the Appraisal Roll……………………………………………… 52<br />
Table 32 <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted Operation <strong>Budget</strong> Dollars by Functional Area…………………………… 53<br />
Table 33 General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function and Changes in<br />
Fund Balance…………………………………………………………………………………… 55<br />
Table 34 Food Service Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in<br />
Fund Balance…………………………………………………………………………………… 57<br />
Table 35 Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in<br />
Fund Balance…………………………………………………………………………………… 59<br />
Table 36 2008 Bond Initiative Capital Projects…………………………………………………………… 60<br />
Table 37 Capital Projects…………………………………………………………………………………… 61<br />
Table 38 Grant Funding Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function…………………… 63<br />
Table 39 Student Enrollment History and Projections…………………………………………………… 66<br />
Table 40 Five-Year Staffing History……………………………………………………………………… 67<br />
Table 41 <strong>Budget</strong> Comparison Excluding Chapter 41 by Percent (General Fund)…………………… 68<br />
Table 42 Future <strong>Budget</strong> Projections for General Fund………………………………………………… 70
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
List of Tables<br />
Organization<br />
Table 43 Enrollment History……………………………………………………………………………… 75<br />
Table 44 Student Ethnicity Percentages of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>……………………………...………………… 76<br />
Table 45 The Code Structure…..…..…………………………..………………………………………… 92<br />
Table 46 Function/Program Intent Codes Matrix…...……………………………………………………103<br />
Table 47 Current Bond Authorization Status…………………………………………………………… 105<br />
Table 48 General Fund-Fund Balance (In Millions)………………………………………………………107<br />
Table 49 <strong>Budget</strong> Development Process………………………………………………………………… 113<br />
Financial<br />
Table 50 All Governmental Funds Combined Statement of Revenue and Expenditures……………119<br />
Table 51 All Governmental Funds Combined Statement of Revenue and Expenditures<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years by Major Object……………………………120<br />
Table 52 Revenue and Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> for <strong>FY2013</strong>……………………………………….……… 126<br />
Table 53 <strong>FY2013</strong> Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> for Three Primary Funds and Recapture…………………… 127<br />
Table 54 Recapture Payments Compared to General Fund Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong>……………………128<br />
Table 55 <strong>FY2013</strong> State Funding Sources…………………………………………………………………129<br />
Table 56 <strong>FY2013</strong> Revenue Sources………………………………………………………………………129<br />
Table 57 Historical Comparison of Revenue Sources……………………………………………………130<br />
Table 58 <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> by Functional Area (General Fund)……………………….. 131<br />
Table 59 <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> by Functional Area (General Fund)……………………….. 132<br />
Table 60 <strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function………… 135<br />
Table 61 General Fund Statement of Revenue and Expenditures<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years by Major Object……………………………137<br />
Table 62 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> Comparison With and Without Chapter 41 …………...……….………… 141<br />
Table 63 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> Comparison With and Without Chapter 41Pie Chart …………...……… 141<br />
Table 64 General Fund Major Changes………...……….……….…..……………………………………142<br />
Table 65 Tax Ratification Election Projected Revenue Scenarios…………………………………… 145<br />
Table 66 General Fund Operating Expenditures per Student………………………………………… 148<br />
Table 67 Food Service Funds Statement of Revenue and Expenditures…...…..……………………339<br />
Table 68 Food Service School and Lunch Program…………………...……………………………… 340<br />
Table 69 Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenue and Expenditures…...…..………………………342<br />
Table 70 Combined Debt Service Schedule………………………………………………………………343<br />
Table 71 Combined Debt Service Timeline………………………………………………………………344<br />
Table 72 Bonded Debt Facts and Legal Debt Margin…………...………………………………………345<br />
Table 73 2008 Bond Initiative Capital Projects……………………………………………………. 347<br />
Table 74 2008 Bond Proposition Detail……………………………………………………………………348<br />
Table 75 Capital Projects……………………………………………………………………………………349<br />
Table 76 Capital Projects Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in<br />
Fund Balance…………………………………………………………………………………… 350<br />
Table 77 Projected Construction Timeline……………………………………………………………… 351<br />
Table 78 Capital Projects Impact on General Fund……………………………………………………. 356<br />
Table 79 Grant Funding from Federal Sources………………………………………………………… 359<br />
Table 80 Proprietary Funds - Print Shop Reproduction…………………………………………………364<br />
Table 81 Proprietary Funds - Worker's Compensation Fund……………………………………………365<br />
Table 82 Proprietary Funds - Health Insurance Fund…………………………………………………. 365<br />
Table 83 Proprietary Funds - Laundry Service……………………………………………………………366<br />
Table 84 Proprietary Funds - District Police………………………………………………………………366
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
List of Tables<br />
Information<br />
Table 85 Net Taxable Value Summary……………………………………………………………………368<br />
Table 86 Net Taxable Value History and Projections…………………………………………………. 369<br />
Table 87 Appraised and Net Taxable Value Comparison………………………………………………370<br />
Table 88 Total Tax Levy……………………………………………………………………………………371<br />
Table 89 Tax Rate History………………………………………………………………………………… 372<br />
Table 90 <strong>FY2013</strong> Central Texas School District Property Tax Rates……………………………. 373<br />
Table 91 Analysis of Tax Burden………………………………………………………………………… 374<br />
Table 92 Property Tax Levies and Collections…………………………………………………………. 375<br />
Table 93 2012 Top Ten Taxpayers…………………………………………………………………….. 375<br />
Table 94 Student Enrollment and Projections…………………………………………………………. 376<br />
Table 95 Student Enrollment Five Year History by Campus…………………………………………. 377<br />
Table 96 District Fact Sheet…………………………………………………………………………… 381<br />
Table 97 Staffing History…………………………………………………………………………………. 382<br />
Table 98 Teacher by Highest Degree Held - A<strong>ISD</strong> Comparison to State………………………….. 383<br />
Table 99 Teacher by Years of Experience - A<strong>ISD</strong> Comparison to State………………………….. 384<br />
Table 100 Projection of Revenue, Expenditures, and Fund Balance for General Fund………………386<br />
Table 101 Projection of Revenue, Expenditures, and Fund Balance for Debt Service and<br />
Food Service Funds………………………………………………………………………………387<br />
Table 102 Schedule of Buildings and Square Footage…………………………………………………. 388<br />
Table 103 Local Peer Group Comparison with Student Groups…………………………………………394<br />
Table 104 Local Peer Group Comparison of Staffing…………………………………………………… 395<br />
Table 105 Local Peer Group Comparison of Operating Expenditures by Program Intent Code…… 396<br />
Table 106 Local Peer Group Comparison of Operating Expenditures by Function……………………397<br />
Table 107 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Student Groups………………………………………… 400<br />
Table 108 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Staffing……………………………………………………401<br />
Table 109 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Operating Expenditures by Program Intent Code……402<br />
Table 110 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Operating Expenditures by Function………………… 403<br />
Table 111 Benchmark Data Comparison to State………………………………………………………. 406<br />
Table 112 <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Staffing Comparison to State Staffing…………………………………………… 407<br />
Table 113 Student Ratio Comparison…………………… `` 408<br />
Table 114 Teacher Ratio Comparison………………………………………………………………………408<br />
Table 115 Per Student Expenditure Ratio <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>………………………………………………….. 409<br />
Table 116 Per Student Expenditure Ratio State of Texas……………………………………………… 409<br />
Table 117 Instruction Percentage Comparison……………………………………………………………410<br />
Table 118 FAST District Ratings with Fiscal Peers……………………………………………………… 412<br />
Table 119 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison with Student Groups…………………………………413<br />
Table 120 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Staffing…………………………………………… 415<br />
Table 121 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Operating Expenditures by Program ………… 417<br />
Table 122 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Operating Expenditures by Function……………419<br />
Table 123 Average Daily Food Services Lunch Participation……………………………………………423<br />
Table 124 Average Daily Food Services BreakfastParticipation…………………………………………423<br />
Table 125 Food Service Productivity……………………………………………………………………… 424<br />
Table 126 District Meal Pricing Comparison……………………………………………………………… 425<br />
Table 127 Histrical and Current District Meal Lunch and Breakfast Pricing……………………………425<br />
Table 128 Transportation Historical and <strong>Budget</strong>ed Information…………………………………………426
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
List of Tables<br />
Information (continued)<br />
Table 129 SAT Performance…………………………………………………………………………………439<br />
Table 130 SAT Performance by Ethnicity………………………………………………………………… 440<br />
Table 131 SAT Campus, District, State, & National Average Scores……………………………………441<br />
Table 132 TAKS Comparison by Student Group………………………………………………………… 442<br />
Table 133 2012 STAAR EOC Preliminary Results for Texas Big 8 School Districts………………… 443<br />
Table 134 AYP Preliminary Results………………………………………………………………………. 444<br />
Table 135 Population Analysis…………………………………………………………………………….. 466<br />
Table 136 Economic and Growth Indicators……………………………………………………………… 467<br />
Table 137 Employment by Industry in the <strong>Austin</strong> Metropolitan Statistical Area……………………… 468<br />
Table 138 Top Ten Employers in <strong>Austin</strong>……………………………………………………………………468<br />
Table 139 Urban and National Comparison of Unemployment Rate……………………………………469
Association of School Business <strong>Official</strong>s International ®<br />
This Meritorious <strong>Budget</strong> Award is presented to<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
For excellence in the preparation and issuance<br />
of its school system budget<br />
for the Fiscal Year 2011-2012.<br />
The budget is judged to conform<br />
to the principles and standards of the<br />
ASBO International ® Meritorious <strong>Budget</strong> Awards<br />
Program.<br />
President<br />
Executive Director
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Mission Statement<br />
In partnership with parents and our community,<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> exists to provide a comprehensive<br />
educational experience that is high quality,<br />
challenging, and inspires all students to make<br />
a positive contribution to society.
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
Introduction
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Administrative Office<br />
1111 West Sixth Street<br />
<strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78703<br />
Board of Trustees<br />
Mark Williams President District 5<br />
Vincent Torres Vice President District 4<br />
Lori Moya Secretary District 6<br />
Tamala Barksdale Member At Large, Position 9<br />
Cheryl Bradley Member District 1<br />
Christine Brister Member District 3<br />
Sam Guzman Member District 2<br />
Annette LoVoi Member At Large, Position 8<br />
Robert Schneider Member District 7<br />
Administrative <strong>Official</strong>s<br />
Meria Carstarphen, Ed.D., Superintendent<br />
Mel Waxler<br />
Pauline Dow<br />
Paul Cruz<br />
William Caritj<br />
Michael Houser<br />
Lawrence Fryer<br />
Nicole Conley-Abram<br />
Chief of Staff<br />
Chief Academic Officer<br />
Chief Schools Officer<br />
Chief Performance Officer<br />
Chief Human Capital Officer<br />
Chief Operations Officer<br />
Chief Financial Officer<br />
<strong>Official</strong>s Issuing Report<br />
Nicole Conley-Abram, Chief Financial Officer<br />
Leo Lopez, Executive Director of Finance<br />
Theresa Wilde, Director, <strong>Budget</strong> Office<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 1
Executive Summary<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District (A<strong>ISD</strong>) is pleased to present the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
financial plan. This budget has been prepared in accordance with state regulations and local policies<br />
covering the 12 month period from September 1, 2012 through August 31, 2013.<br />
This will be the third year of a five-year budget plan that began during FY2010. Our strategy has been to<br />
reduce the budget, stabilize our resources and create a structure that allows us to do a better job of<br />
controlling our finances and our destiny as a district. A<strong>ISD</strong> is in a better position to plan for such<br />
strategic goals as a staff compensation increase and other priorities outlined in the district’s five-year<br />
Strategic Plan.<br />
The district has worked aggressively to build up reserves during FY2012, as it has done for the past few<br />
years, so that A<strong>ISD</strong> is positioned to absorb the additional legislative formula state aid decreases in<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong>. Our multi-year financial planning has allowed the district to continue its practice of taking<br />
preemptive actions to address budget challenges, now and in the future. As a result, we are currently in<br />
a position where we do not anticipate having to reduce staff or make other significant budget reductions<br />
for <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
The result of a strategy that was based on identifying efficiencies, implementing spending controls,<br />
maximizing available grants and increasing our average daily attendance, our district’s fund balance<br />
reserves now exceed the 14 percent required by the Board’s policy, but is projected to be slightly under<br />
what the Texas Education Agency recommends school districts maintain to cover fall collection deficits<br />
and other dollars needed to cover cash flow. We will continue to protect fund balance reserves so they<br />
are sufficient to cover these delayed costs and future unanticipated needs.<br />
Last year’s staff cuts were difficult and have created challenges. At the campus level, even with the<br />
personnel reductions, principals and staff members are meeting higher performance expectations.<br />
District staff members are doing everything possible to ensure that our students do not bear the brunt of<br />
recent budget cuts. For everyone, the challenges have increased, and we are all doing more with less.<br />
In the future, as now, retaining high-quality staff members will continue to be one of our biggest<br />
challenges. The time has come to consider salary increases for all of our staff members. Within the next<br />
year or two, the district is likely to seek the support of voters for a tax ratification election to fund a salary<br />
increase for district employees.<br />
This document is the culmination of an intensive budgeting process involving input from the Board of<br />
Trustees, senior cabinet, principals, central office staff, department heads, the <strong>Budget</strong> and Finance<br />
Advisory Committee (BFAC), the District Advisory Council (DAC), parents and citizens. During this<br />
process, staff used budgetary discipline to support the continuation of efficient and successful programs,<br />
while implementing new initiatives to expedite the achievement of district-wide goals using available<br />
resources. In fiscal terms, this is the action plan for both the instructional and ancillary processes<br />
necessary for successful operation of the district.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 2
Core Values<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> is a school-minded community committed to the following core values:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Focus on Children<br />
Excellence<br />
Integrity<br />
Equity<br />
Respect<br />
Health and Safety<br />
Strategic Values<br />
In December 2009, the Board of Trustees approved the A<strong>ISD</strong> Strategic Plan for FY2010-2015. With<br />
limited resources, A<strong>ISD</strong> must remain focused on the goals and strategies that will best prepare all<br />
students for college, career and life in a globally competitive environment.<br />
As a district, we hold ourselves accountable for meeting the needs of all of our students. A<strong>ISD</strong>’s allocation<br />
of resources is designed to maximize student achievement. Focusing resources to accomplish this end is<br />
our highest priority. Throughout the district, campus leadership is actively involved in making focused<br />
requests that target dollars to improve student performance.<br />
"We all have a stake in public education.<br />
It is the most important investment we can<br />
make as a community for the future health<br />
and prosperity of our city, our state and our<br />
nation. As a community, we need to<br />
determine the quality of education we<br />
demand for our kids. We need to ask<br />
ourselves whether we have the courage<br />
and community to adequately invest in our<br />
schools and in our children’s education<br />
for the future."<br />
Meria J. Carstarphen, Ed.D.,<br />
Superintendent – <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 3
Strategic Plan Framework<br />
Mission<br />
WHAT WE DO<br />
In partnership with parents and our community,<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> exists to provide a comprehensive<br />
educational experience that is high quality,<br />
challenging, and inspires all students to<br />
make a positive contribution to society.<br />
Vision<br />
WHERE WE WANT TO BE<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> will be nationally recognized as an<br />
outstanding school district, instilling a passion<br />
for life-long learning in all students.<br />
Values<br />
WHAT WE BELIEVE IN<br />
Focus on Children<br />
Excellence<br />
Integrity<br />
Equity<br />
Respect<br />
Health and Safety<br />
Goals<br />
WHAT WE WANT TO ACCOMPLISH<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
All students will perform at or above grade<br />
level.<br />
Achievement gaps among all student<br />
groups will be eliminated.<br />
All students will graduate ready for college,<br />
career and life in a globally competitive<br />
economy.<br />
All schools will meet or exceed state<br />
accountability standards, and the district<br />
will meet federal standards and exceed<br />
state standards.<br />
Strategies<br />
HOW WE WILL ACHIEVE OUR GOALS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Provide a high-quality, well-rounded<br />
educational experience to all students that is<br />
rigorous, culturally relevant, healthful and<br />
engaging.<br />
Build strong relationships with students,<br />
families, and the community to increase trust<br />
and shared responsibility.<br />
Ensure that every classroom has a highquality,<br />
effective educator, supported by<br />
high-quality, effective administrators and<br />
support staff.<br />
Align resources to accomplish priorities<br />
within a balanced budget.<br />
Measurable Outcomes<br />
HOW WE WILL CHECK<br />
PROGRESS ON OUR GOALS<br />
1. Results of standardized testing<br />
2. Achievement gaps among student groups<br />
3. Graduation rates<br />
4. College readiness<br />
5. Postsecondary enrollment<br />
6. Enrollment in Advanced Placement (AP)<br />
courses<br />
7. Performance in AP courses<br />
8. Additional measures related to readiness for<br />
college, career, and life in a globally<br />
competitive economy<br />
9. District and accountability ratings<br />
10. Attendance rates<br />
11. Four-year completion rates<br />
12. Annual dropout rates<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 4
Facts about <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> is the fifth largest school district in Texas and the 37th largest district in the United States. It<br />
serves the City of <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas, which has a population of approximately 790,390 according to the latest<br />
decennial 2010 U.S. Census Bureau statistics. The Census Bureau estimates the <strong>Austin</strong> Metropolitan<br />
Statistical Area (MSA) has a population of 1,716,289 and projects this number to increase by 33.9<br />
percent to 2,292,737 by 2020. As the seat of government for the State of Texas, <strong>Austin</strong> has become a<br />
vibrant, dynamic business, government and educational center. Founded in 1839 as the tiny village of<br />
Waterloo, the city has become one of the fastest growing cities in the United States. <strong>Austin</strong> is also a<br />
highly touted educational center, hosting the respected University of Texas, St. Edwards University and a<br />
variety of other higher education institutions.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is an independent, public educational agency operating under the applicable laws and regulations in<br />
the State of Texas. The district’s organizational hierarchy begins with the students, parents and<br />
community members who elect a nine-member Board of Trustees to autonomously govern the district.<br />
The Board of Trustees employs the superintendent, who is the Chief Executive Officer, to manage the<br />
day-to-day operations of the district. Under the superintendent are seven chiefs, who oversee various<br />
areas of the district’s operations, including academics, campus operations, human resources, facilities<br />
and system management, finance, performance evaluation and accountability. The Texas Education<br />
Agency provides the district’s education accreditation.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Board of Trustees<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees<br />
(from left) Robert Schneider, District 7; Tamala Barksdale, At Large 9; Lori Moya, SECRETARY, District 6;<br />
Cheryl Bradley, District 1; Mark Williams, PRESIDENT, District 5; Vincent M. Torres, VICE PRESIDENT, District 4;<br />
Christine Brister, District 3; Annette LoVoi, At Large 8; Sam Guzmán, District 2.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 5
This district will serve a community with a projected student enrollment of 87,336 students for the <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
school year. <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> operates 84 elementary schools, 18 middle schools, 17 high schools and 10<br />
special campuses/alternative centers.<br />
The district’s population is diverse. The population is expected to grow as the City of <strong>Austin</strong> attracts talent<br />
from around the nation and the world in technology, higher education, and research and development<br />
industries.<br />
Table 1<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Ethnicity Percentages for <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Ethnicity FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
African American 11.7% 11.3% 9.5% 9.1%<br />
Asian/Pacific Islanders 3.4% 3.7% 3.3% 3.3%<br />
Hispanic 58.8% 58.9% 60.3% 60.5%<br />
Native American 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%<br />
White 25.8% 25.8% 24.3% 24.4%<br />
Other 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 2.4%<br />
Hispanic<br />
60.5%<br />
Native<br />
American<br />
0.3%<br />
African<br />
American<br />
9.1%<br />
White<br />
24.4%<br />
Asian/Pacific<br />
Islanders<br />
3.3%<br />
Other<br />
2.4%<br />
Preliminary teacher staffing formulas for <strong>FY2013</strong> will remain unchanged from the FY2012 school year.<br />
Elementary class size caps will remain as follows: PK (20:1), K-4 (22:1), and 5-6 (30:1). Secondary class<br />
sizes are targeted at an approximate level of 29 per class, based on teaching a 6 out of 8 schedule.<br />
There will be 178 instructional days in the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year. This represents an increase of three<br />
student instructional days over the FY2012 school year. Teachers will have nine days for professional<br />
development and planning/preparation. The school calendar shows the beginning and ending of the<br />
school year, as well as school holidays and professional development/planning days. The district has sixweek<br />
and nine-week grading periods. To prepare the school calendar, the administration works with a<br />
task force made up of both community representatives and staff members. The Board of Trustees<br />
approves the final school calendar.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 6
Academic Programs<br />
In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the district will serve an estimated 87,336 students at 119 regular campuses and 10 special<br />
campuses. In every classroom, the focus every day is on teaching and learning. Through high standards<br />
that ensure academic rigor in a thinking curriculum, students’ learning opportunities are grounded in the<br />
skills they will need for success in the 21 st Century.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Elementary School (84 schools with a projected enrollment of 49,269 students in prekindergarten-grade<br />
5): Most schools offer kindergarten through fifth grade, although some include<br />
pre-kindergarten and/or sixth grade. The elementary instructional program includes a core<br />
curriculum of Reading, Writing, Mathematics, Science and Social Studies. It also provides for<br />
student intervention as needed. The enrichment curriculum offers Health, Physical Education and<br />
Fine Arts. The district emphasizes that each child must have a consistent challenging curriculum<br />
that surpasses state requirements. Gifted and Talented, Bilingual Education, English as a Second<br />
Language, and Special Education programs are available to meet specific needs. A<strong>ISD</strong> will open<br />
its first in-district charter, college preparatory school, IDEA Allan, during <strong>FY2013</strong>. The Uphaus<br />
Early Childhood Center also will open during <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
Middle School (18 schools with a projected enrollment of 16,294 students in grades 6-8): The<br />
middle school foundation and enrichment courses develop concepts and skills introduced in<br />
elementary school. Career and Technology Education courses are available to expose students<br />
to a variety of career possibilities. English as a Second Language, Advanced Academics and<br />
Special Education programs are available to meet specific needs.<br />
High School (17 schools with a projected enrollment of 21,271 students in grades 9-12): High<br />
schools offer students more advanced education in English, Language Arts, Mathematics, Social<br />
Studies and Science. Students also must take courses in Health and physical education and at<br />
least one year of a language other than English. A wide variety of elective courses include<br />
additional foreign-language study and fine arts electives such as Choral Music, Band, Orchestra,<br />
Art, Dance, and Theater Arts. Career and Technology Education offers courses to prepare<br />
students for careers in high demand. A magnet high school provides advanced academic<br />
programs for students. English as Second Language, Advanced Academics and Special<br />
Education programs are available to meet specific needs.<br />
Special Campuses (10 campuses with a projected enrollment of 502 students): Special<br />
campuses include the Leadership Academy, Phoenix Academy, Travis County Day School, the<br />
Travis County Juvenile Detention Center, the <strong>Austin</strong> State Hospital, Garza Independence High<br />
School, Rosedale and a redesigned Learning Support Center model for disciplinary placement.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 7
Academic Rating<br />
In response to recent legislative mandates, state accountability in Texas will be in transition during<br />
FY2012 and <strong>FY2013</strong> as the TEA implements a new set of standardized tests, the State of Texas<br />
Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR), and develops an entirely new state accountability<br />
system. No new state ratings will be issued in FY2012, the first year of the STAAR assessments.<br />
However, under federal adequate yearly progress (AYP) accountability, campuses and districts will be<br />
evaluated in FY2012 and assigned a status of Meets AYP, Missed AYP or Not Evaluated. Federal AYP<br />
ratings will be based on TAKS results for grade 10, STAAR results for grades 3-8 at the Texas<br />
Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) proficiency level, and attendance/graduation rates. AYP<br />
ratings will be released in fall 2012. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the first year of campus and district ratings under the new<br />
accountability system, the state will issue only two ratings: acceptable and unacceptable. Higher<br />
distinction designation rating levels for campuses and districts will be developed and assigned for the first<br />
time in FY2014. <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> received an Academically Acceptable rating in FY2011, which is the most<br />
recent TEA Accountability Rating period.<br />
House Bill (HB) 3, enacted by the 81 st Legislature in 2009, made significant changes to the Texas<br />
Education Code. The focus of the new state accountability system will shift from meeting satisfactory<br />
requirements to meeting both satisfactory (Level II) and college-ready (Level III) standards on new<br />
STAAR assessments. One of the most important goals set forth for the new accountability system is for<br />
Texas to become one of the top ten states for graduating college-ready students by FY2020.<br />
Legislative mandates require that the following indicators must be used in determining ratings under the<br />
new state accountability system:<br />
STAAR grades 3-8 English<br />
STAAR grades 3-5 Spanish<br />
STAAR end-of-course (EOC) assessments including retests (Grade 11 TAKS performance must<br />
also be included in the <strong>FY2013</strong> ratings)<br />
Dropout rates for grades 9-12 or district completion rates, and<br />
High school graduation rates<br />
STAAR assessment indicators must include evaluation of:<br />
Level II performance, and for students who did not meet the Level II standard, progress toward<br />
the Level II standard.<br />
Level III performance, and for students who did not meet the Level III standard, progress toward<br />
the Level III standard.<br />
(The use of progress measures is mandated by HB3, but will not be available for use until FY2014.<br />
Level III performance cannot be evaluated for acceptable/unacceptable ratings in <strong>FY2013</strong>.)<br />
Statute specifies that additional features will be available for the assessment and dropout/graduation<br />
indicators under the new accountability system to improve the rating outcome for campuses and<br />
districts. Two are required and one is optional. The additional features are:<br />
Required Improvement (RI) over the prior year (required), or<br />
Average performance over the last three years (required), or<br />
Performance on 85 percent of the measures meets the standard (optional).<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 8
While these indicators are required components of the new state accountability system, the Texas<br />
Commissioner of Education has the authority to select the overall framework for the system design, to<br />
determine the number of rating levels and the labels associated with each level, and to determine to what<br />
extent state and federal AYP accountability systems are aligned. A range of options from a system of<br />
“separate indicators” to a “performance index” may be selected and still satisfy statutory requirements.<br />
The commissioner also has the option of developing separate indicators for elementary, middle, and high<br />
school grade spans or separate indicators for STAAR grades 3-8 and high school EOC results. In<br />
addition to the indicators listed above, the commissioner has the authority to include additional indicators<br />
in the accountability system and set their targets.<br />
During FY2012 and <strong>FY2013</strong>, Texas Education Agency staff will meet with two groups to discuss the<br />
design of the new state accountability system:<br />
Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) will consider complex technical issues<br />
related to accountability in order to develop recommendations that ensure that Texas achieves<br />
the goals of the accountability system for 2013 and beyond. Members are Texas public school<br />
educators from school districts and Education Service Centers who have detailed knowledge of<br />
assessment and accountability systems.<br />
Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) consists of educators representing<br />
campuses, school districts, and education service centers; legislative representatives; business<br />
and community leaders; representatives of higher education; and parents of children attending<br />
Texas public schools. The APAC will provide to the Commissioner of Education its responses to<br />
the ATAC proposals.<br />
These committees will consider complex technical issues related to the development of an integrated<br />
academic accountability system for Texas public schools and make recommendations to the<br />
Commissioner of Education. As recommendations from these committees become available, the public<br />
will have the opportunity to comment. The commissioner will release final accountability decisions for<br />
2013 and 2014 in March of each year.<br />
Academic Assessment and Accountability<br />
When measuring students’ academic performance, academic assessment and accountability go hand in<br />
hand. Historically, the focus has been on the percentage of students reaching the proficiency standard in<br />
various subject areas such as Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Social Studies, and Science and also the<br />
percentage of students meeting the more rigorous commended performance level. While passing<br />
standards have not yet been set for STAAR 3-8, preliminary assessment data on the performance of<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> students indicate that there has been improvement when compared to prior year TAKS results<br />
for grades 3 through 8 and that <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> students performed well on end of course exams relative to<br />
other Big-8 urban school districts.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 9
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) and the State of Texas Assessments of<br />
Academic Readiness (STAAR) TAKS Equivalent (Grades 3-8) – TAKS was the former comprehensive<br />
testing program for Texas public school students. The TAKS was replaced by STAAR in 2012. Since<br />
STAAR passing standards for grades 3 through 8 will not be set until December 2012, TEA<br />
commissioned a bridging study for the specific purpose of meeting the federal mandate to evaluate<br />
adequate yearly progress (AYP) in reading and mathematics. Results of the bridging study allow for<br />
comparisons between 2011 TAKS and 2012 STAAR. Overall, when compared to TAKS 2011, the percent<br />
meeting the TAKS equivalent standard increased for all groups in Writing and Social Studies, for all but<br />
one group in Math and Science, and for all but two groups in Reading/ELA.<br />
Table 2<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2011 TAKS and 2012 STAAR (TAKS Equivalent) Results - Grade 3-8 by Group<br />
Group<br />
2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012<br />
All Students 85% 87% 83% 85% 92% 95% 79% 82% 92% 97%<br />
African American 79% 81% 72% 74% 88% 94% 65% 70% 87% 97%<br />
Hispanic 80% 83% 79% 82% 90% 94% 73% 77% 90% 96%<br />
White 97% 97% 95% 96% 98% 99% 95% 97% 98% 100%<br />
Econ. Dis. 79% 82% 77% 80% 89% 93% 70% 74% 89% 95%<br />
LEP 71% 75% 75% 78% 86% 90% 57% 62% 76% 91%<br />
Special Education 82% 82% 79% 79% 74% 87% 63% 62% 87% 90%<br />
Current yr incl STAAR/M/Alt, Grd 3‐8<br />
Prior yr incl TAKS/A/M/Alt/L, Grd 3‐8 fr 04/11<br />
Reading /ELA<br />
Math<br />
Writing Science Social Studies<br />
Percent Met Stnd Percent Met Stnd Percent Met Stnd Percent Met Stnd Percent Met Stnd<br />
STAAR End-of-Course assessments – With the introduction of STAAR, newly enrolled 9th graders,<br />
students who entered high school in fall 2011, were required to take the End-of-Course (EOC)<br />
assessment in each subject in which they are enrolled and for which an EOC assessment exists. The<br />
timeline for standard - setting activities differs for STAAR grades 3 through 8 and STAAR EOC because<br />
of the timing of available assessment data and different legislative requirements. For STAAR EOC,<br />
operational assessment data were available from the spring 2011 administrations. Therefore,<br />
performance standards were set in February 2012, prior to the spring administrations.<br />
Results for end of course (EOC) assessments taken by a typical 9th grade students; English I - Reading,<br />
English I - Writing, Algebra I, Biology, and World Geography; indicate that A<strong>ISD</strong> led the Big- 8 urban<br />
school districts in meeting or exceeding the Level II (Phase-in 1) Standard in four subjects. According to<br />
these results, A<strong>ISD</strong> led Big-8 districts in English I- Reading; English I- Writing; Algebra I and World<br />
Geography and ranked second in Biology.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 10
Table 3<br />
2012 STAAR EOC Preliminary Results for Texas Big-8 School Districts<br />
Percentage Meeting Level II (Phase-in 1) Standard<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
Corpus<br />
Christi<br />
Dallas<br />
El Paso<br />
Fort<br />
Worth<br />
Houston<br />
San<br />
Antonio<br />
Ysleta<br />
State<br />
English I Reading 69% 60% 56% 59% 55% 59% 53% 64% 68%<br />
English I Writing 54% 44% 43% 44% 37% 47% 34% 48% 55%<br />
Algebra I 84% 68% 75% 83% 78% 79% 68% 79% 83%<br />
Biology 84% 76% 83% 81% 81% 84% 78% 85% 87%<br />
World Geography 79% 72% 76% 75% 71% 73% 68% 79% 81%<br />
Source: Texas Assessment Management System - STAAR Assessment Summary Results 2012<br />
STAAR 3-8 Percent of Questions Answered Correctly - STAAR performance standards will not be<br />
set by TEA until December 2012 and passing rates for STAAR grades 3-8 will not be available until<br />
January of 2013; however, preliminary results for the STAAR 3-8 assessments indicate that A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
students met or exceeded state averages on the percent of questions answered correctly on 14 of the<br />
17 tests administered in English.<br />
Table 4<br />
Average Percent of Questions Answered Correctly A<strong>ISD</strong> and State<br />
STAAR 2012 Grades 3-8<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> State<br />
Grade 3<br />
Reading 70% 65%<br />
Math 70% 65%<br />
Grade 4<br />
Reading 70% 66%<br />
Math 71% 67%<br />
Writing 61% 59%<br />
Grade 5<br />
Reading 70% 67%<br />
Math 70% 68%<br />
Science 75% 73%<br />
Grade 6<br />
Reading 67% 69%<br />
Math 62% 60%<br />
Grade 7<br />
Reading 66% 66%<br />
Math 56% 56%<br />
Writing 60% 61%<br />
Grade 8<br />
Reading 67% 67%<br />
Math 50% 55%<br />
Science 63% 63%<br />
Social Studies 56% 56%<br />
State Raw Scores http://www.tea.state.tx.us/staar/rpt/sum/yr12/<br />
downloaded 6/21/12<br />
Notes: Includes tests administered in English. Does not include<br />
modified or linguistically accomodated tests<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 11
Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – Federal No Child Left Behind AYP standards for all student<br />
groups continue to increase. Last year, the U.S. Secretary of Education, told Congress that 82 percent of<br />
America's schools could fail to achieve AYP this year based on the higher passing standards. In<br />
February, the U.S. Department of Education invited each state education agency to submit a waiver from<br />
specific NCLB requirements.<br />
Amid the increasing standards, the <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District is leading the Big-8 districts -<br />
comprised of large, urban school districts in Texas- with 57 percent of schools meeting the federallymandated<br />
AYP requirements. On September 6, 2012, the Texas Education Agency announced its intent<br />
to submit waiver requests to the U.S. Department of Education of certain provisions of the ESEA, as<br />
amended by P.L. 107-110 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, including waivers to sections on AYP<br />
calculations and performance targets.<br />
As a district, A<strong>ISD</strong> did not meet mathematics and reading standards and will enter Stage 3 of the School<br />
Improvement Program. To address this rating, the district will allocate a percentage of its Title 1 funds for<br />
professional development in both of these subjects.<br />
Table 5<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Results for Texas Big-8 School Districts<br />
2011-2012 Preliminary AYP Results for All Campuses<br />
2012<br />
District AYP Status<br />
Met AYP<br />
2011 Campus Results<br />
Missed AYP<br />
Not<br />
Evaluated<br />
Total<br />
Campuses<br />
Met AYP<br />
2012 Campus Results<br />
Missed AYP<br />
Not<br />
Evaluated<br />
Total<br />
Campuses<br />
# % # % # % # # % # % # % #<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: Stage 3 87 71% 31 25% 5 4% 123 70 57% 48 39% 4 3% 122<br />
Corpus Christi <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: Stage 3 41 68% 16 27% 3 5% 60 21 36% 34 59% 3 5% 58<br />
Dallas <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: Stage 3 140 61% 83 36% 7 3% 230 61 26% 158 67% 17 7% 236<br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: None 64 68% 24 26% 6 6% 94 53 56% 35 37% 6 6% 94<br />
Fort Worth <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: Stage 3 48 35% 76 55% 15 11% 139 41 29% 84 60% 16 11% 141<br />
Houston <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: Stage 3 211 71% 75 25% 11 4% 297 97 35% 169 61% 11 4% 277<br />
San Antonio <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: Stage 3 50 51% 43 43% 6 6% 99 18 18% 73 74% 7 7% 98<br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP: None 43 70% 16 26% 2 3% 61 18 29% 41 66% 3 5% 62<br />
STATE Missed AYP 5,636 66% 1,807 21% 178 2% 8,526 3,773 44% 4,080 48% 676 8% 8,529<br />
Source: TEA District and Campus Listings on TEA website<br />
Note: "Met AYP" percentages include schools "not evaluated" in the denominator (reflecting TEA methodology). <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> percentage "Met AYP" for 2012 increases to 59% when<br />
schools "not evaluated" are excluded from the calculation.<br />
For more information on TEA District and Campus Performance<br />
Data, please visit the following page on the district’s web site:<br />
http://archive.austinisd.org/inside/accountability/reviews<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 12
SAT – This standardized college entrance examination evaluates a candidate’s critical thinking and<br />
problem solving skills which help measure their overall ability and potential to undertake the bachelor<br />
level study program. The subject test covers five general areas, including English, History and Social<br />
Studies, Mathematics, Science and Languages. The reasoning test assesses students reasoning in<br />
Mathematics, Verbal and Writing Skills.<br />
Ethnicity Group<br />
Table 6<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2010-2012 SAT Results – District Averages by Group<br />
2010 2011 2012<br />
No. Verbal Math Writing No. Verbal Math Writing No. Verbal Math Writing<br />
Native American 14 574 548 503 20 512 572 504 13 551 553 513<br />
Asian 133 543 617 545 150 514 585 512 147 538 602 518<br />
African American 278 407 429 395 324 408 427 390 314 416 439 397<br />
Mexican or Mexican<br />
American<br />
517 459 488 445 579 433 468 422 656 444 478 426<br />
Puerto Rican 16 504 533 493 13 467 475 426 14 509 530 530<br />
Other Hispanic, Latino, or<br />
Latin American 383 439 464 432 478 438 465 426 471 438 466 466<br />
White 949 565 589 549 1,107 571 591 554 1,062 571 590 590<br />
Other 31 489 511 466 50 492 526 482 61 523 533 533<br />
No Response 52 551 559 519 26 515 517 492 36 494 507 507<br />
Total 2,373 500 527 487 2,747 493 521 480 2,774 497 523 523<br />
ACT – This standardized college entrance examination assesses high school students’ general<br />
educational development and their ability to complete college-level work. The multiple-choice tests cover<br />
four skill areas: English, Mathematics, Reading and Science. The Writing Test, which is optional,<br />
measures skills in planning and writing short essays. A perfect ACT score is 36. In 2011, the A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
student average composite ACT score (21.3) exceeded the state (20.8) and national (21.1) averages.<br />
Ethnicity Group<br />
Table 7<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2011-2012 ACT Results – District Averages by Group<br />
2011 2012<br />
English Math Reading Science Composite English Math Reading Science Composite<br />
Native American * * * * * * * * * *<br />
Asian 22.7 26.7 23.0 23.7 24.1 24.1 27.1 25.2 25.0 25.5<br />
African American 16.0 17.9 16.2 16.9 16.5 14.9 17.8 16.8 17.3 16.8<br />
Hispanic 16.9 20.1 18.6 19.0 18.8 17.1 20.1 18.4 19.1 18.8<br />
White 24.8 26.0 25.3 24.5 25.3 24.3 25.4 25.2 24.3 24.9<br />
All Students 20.0 22.4 21.0 21.1 21.3 20.2 22.4 21.4 21.3 21.4<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 13
A<strong>ISD</strong>’s Continued Commitment to Students and Taxpayers<br />
The district is making progress in reducing achievement gaps between student groups, creating a<br />
college-bound culture, and boosting the expectations for and the achievement of English language<br />
learners and special education students. The district compares favorably to its peers in Texas and<br />
nationally in a number of important areas:<br />
<br />
<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> leads Texas school districts in the number of National Board Certified teachers for the 12th<br />
year in a row. In FY2011, A<strong>ISD</strong> had 237 National Board Certified Teachers, up from 216 in<br />
FY2010.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong>’s fourth- and eighth-grade<br />
students continued to outperform<br />
their peers in large cities and<br />
other urban school districts on<br />
the 2011 National Assessment of<br />
Educational Progress (NAEP),<br />
also known as the “Nation’s<br />
Report Card.”<br />
NAEP results from FY2011<br />
showed that the percentage of<br />
fourth- and eighth-grade A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
students scoring at or above<br />
Basic in reading and<br />
mathematics was higher than the<br />
percentage of students scoring at<br />
or above Basic in these subjects<br />
in large city school districts, and<br />
in several other districts that<br />
participated in the Trial Urban<br />
District Assessment (TUDA).<br />
<br />
<br />
In FY2011, the average SAT score for A<strong>ISD</strong> students was greater than the state average score<br />
and slightly lower than the national average score. <strong>Austin</strong> students’ average total score of 1494<br />
points included 493 in verbal (critical reading), 521 in mathematics and 480 in writing. A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
exceeded the state’s average by 48 points. The district's counterparts in Texas scored 479 in<br />
verbal, 502 in mathematics and 465 in writing, respectively, for a total average state score of<br />
1446 points.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> students taking the ACT in FY2011 exceeded both the state and national overall average<br />
scores. The average composite ACT score (21.3) for A<strong>ISD</strong> students increased in FY2011, while<br />
the state (20.8) and national average (21.1) composite scores remained the same.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 14
$10,000<br />
$9,000<br />
$8,000<br />
$9,493<br />
Table 8<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Operating Expenditures per Pupil FY2011<br />
$7,252<br />
$9,673<br />
$8,313<br />
$9,209 $9,064<br />
$8,182<br />
$9,159<br />
$7,000<br />
$6,000<br />
$5,000<br />
$4,000<br />
$3,000<br />
$2,000<br />
$1,000<br />
$0<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> CYPRESS DALLAS <strong>ISD</strong> EL PASO FORT HOUSTON NORTHSIDE SAN<br />
FAIRBANKS<br />
<strong>ISD</strong> WORTH <strong>ISD</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> ANTONIO<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Other Funds & Grants $1,893 $1,463 $2,309 $1,735 $2,297 $2,220 $1,424 $2,525<br />
General Fund $7,600 $5,789 $7,364 $6,578 $6,912 $6,844 $6,758 $6,634<br />
Our Student Investment When Compared to our Texas Urban Peers<br />
In FY2011, the most recent year for which comparable data are available, <strong>Austin</strong> spent $9,493 per pupil,<br />
which ranks second highest among urban school districts in Texas. Dallas, the highest, spent $9,673 per<br />
pupil and Fort Worth <strong>ISD</strong>, the third highest, spent $9,209 per pupil. Five of the eight urban peers<br />
illustrated in the following table had per pupil expenditures exceeding $9,000 per year. <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>’s perpupil<br />
spending level reflects the district’s commitment to ensuring that its fast-growing, diverse student<br />
population graduates prepared to meet the competitive demands of a global economy. Also, <strong>Austin</strong> is one<br />
of the few school districts that are required by law to contribute to the Social Security Administration at a<br />
cost of $33 million annually, or $387 per pupil in FY2011. When the per pupil costs of social security are<br />
factored, <strong>Austin</strong>'s spending ranks third, just behind Fort Worth.<br />
Due to significant budget reductions in FY2011, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>’s per-pupil expenditures decreased $116 from<br />
$9,609 in FY2010 to $9,493 in FY2011.<br />
How <strong>Austin</strong> Stacks Up Nationally<br />
While <strong>Austin</strong>’s per-pupil spending compares favorably among its statewide peers, the same is not the<br />
case nationally. Texas spends less per student on public education than most other states. According to<br />
FY2012 Quality Counts, an annual report card published by Education Week, Texas received a grade of<br />
“D+” for education spending. Further, the state received an “F” for student spending as it ranked 49th out<br />
of 50 states.<br />
The latest data from the FY2011 NAEP results demonstrate that <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> outperformed most of the<br />
TUDA districts in both reading and mathematics in fourth and eighth grade. When comparing the seven<br />
TUDA districts with similar student economic disadvantage, A<strong>ISD</strong> per-pupil expenditures are among the<br />
lowest. This suggests that A<strong>ISD</strong> is accomplishing more with less.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 15
Mathematics<br />
Overall, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>’s FY2011 mathematics results demonstrate that the percentage of fourth- and eighthgraders<br />
scoring at or above Basic remains higher than the percentage of their peers scoring at or above<br />
Basic in most other TUDA districts and in large city school districts (LCs) — school districts located in<br />
cities with populations of 250,000 or more.<br />
The percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong> fourth graders scoring at or above Basic (87 percent) in mathematics was<br />
significantly higher than that of their peers in 18 of the 20 other TUDA districts, LCs (74 percent) and<br />
national public schools (82 percent), and represents a significant increase from FY2007 (83 percent). In<br />
addition, fourth-grade economically disadvantaged students’ average scale scores in mathematics<br />
improved significantly from FY2007 (229) to FY2011 (235). Similarly, the percentage of fourth-grade<br />
Hispanic students scoring at or above Basic in mathematics (82 percent) was greater than that of their<br />
peers in LCs (71 percent), national public schools (72 percent) and 12 of the 20 other TUDA districts.<br />
Table 9<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Percent of fourth graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP mathematics, 2011<br />
The percentage<br />
of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
fourth-graders<br />
scoring at or<br />
above Basic was<br />
higher than the<br />
percentage of<br />
students scoring<br />
at or above Basic<br />
in large cities,<br />
national public<br />
schools, and 18<br />
other TUDA<br />
districts.<br />
The percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong> eighth-graders scoring at or above Basic (74 percent) in mathematics was<br />
significantly higher than that of their peers in 17 of the 20 other TUDA districts and LCs (63 percent), and<br />
was similar to that of their peers in national public schools (72 percent). It also increased significantly from<br />
FY2005 (68 percent). Students in several subgroups outperformed their peers in mathematics in similar<br />
districts, with scores improving significantly since FY2005. The percentage of eighth-grade Hispanic<br />
students scoring at or above Basic (67 percent) in mathematics was higher than that of their peers in LCs<br />
(58 percent) and national public schools (60 percent), and represented a significant improvement from<br />
FY2005 (56 percent). Additionally, the percentages of economically disadvantaged (62 percent) and<br />
English language learner (ELL) students (39 percent) scoring at or above Basic in mathematics in A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
were higher than those of their peers in LCs (55 percent and 26 percent, respectively) and represented<br />
significant improvement from FY2005 (49 percent and 21 percent, respectively).<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 16
Table 10<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Percent of eight graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP mathematics, 2011<br />
The percentage<br />
of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
eight-graders<br />
scoring at or<br />
above Basic was<br />
higher than the<br />
percentage of<br />
students scoring<br />
at or above Basic<br />
in large cities,<br />
national public<br />
schools, and 17<br />
other TUDA<br />
districts.<br />
Reading<br />
In FY2011, the percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong> students in both grades scoring at or above Basic in reading was<br />
higher than that of their peers in most TUDA districts and LCs. Overall, the percentage of fourth-graders<br />
scoring at or above Basic in reading (68 percent) was significantly higher than that of their peers in 15 of<br />
the 20 other TUDA districts and LCs (555), and was similar to that of their peers in national public schools<br />
(66 percent). It also was significantly higher in FY2011 than in FY2005 (61 percent). In addition, the<br />
percentage of fourth-grade students identified as ELLs who scored at or above Basic in reading in<br />
FY2011 (40 percent) has improved significantly since FY2005 (26 percent). Also noteworthy, the<br />
percentage of Black students scoring at or above Basic in reading (62 percent) was higher than that of<br />
their peers in LCs (45 percent) and 11 of the 20 other TUDA districts.<br />
Among A<strong>ISD</strong>’s eighth-graders, the percentage of students scoring at or above Basic in reading in FY2011<br />
(71 percent) was significantly higher than that of students in 15 of the 20 other TUDA districts and LCs<br />
(65 percent), but was not significantly different from that of their peers in national public schools (75<br />
percent). However, it represented a significant improvement from FY2005 (65 percent). From FY2005-<br />
2011, the percentage of White students scoring at or above Basic in reading has improved from 86<br />
percent to 94 percent, and was significantly higher in FY2011 than that of their peers in LCs (83 percent)<br />
and in national public schools (84 percent). Although the percentages of Hispanic (63 percent) and<br />
economically disadvantaged (58 percent) students scoring at or above Basic in reading were not<br />
significantly higher than those of their peers in LCs (Hispanic students: 60 percent, economically<br />
disadvantaged students: 59 percent) or national public schools (Hispanic students: 63 percent;<br />
economically disadvantaged students: 63 percent), Hispanic and economically disadvantaged students<br />
have shown significant improvement in NAEP reading since FY2005 (Hispanic: 52 percent; economically<br />
disadvantaged students: 49 percent).<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 17
Table 11<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Percent of fourth graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP reading, 2011<br />
The percentage<br />
of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
fourth-graders<br />
scoring at or<br />
above Basic was<br />
higher than the<br />
percentage of<br />
students scoring<br />
at or above Basic<br />
in large cities and<br />
15 other TUDA<br />
districts.<br />
Table 12<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Percent of eighth graders scoring at or above Basic on NAEP reading, 2011<br />
The percentage<br />
of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
eighth-graders<br />
scoring at or<br />
above Basic was<br />
higher than the<br />
percentage of<br />
students scoring<br />
at or above Basic<br />
in large cities and<br />
15 other TUDA<br />
districts.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 18
Financial Accountability<br />
Despite budget constraints in recent years, A<strong>ISD</strong> continues to use sound fiscal management practices,<br />
and prudently allocates its resources. <strong>Budget</strong>s have been developed and implemented with a focus on<br />
students and their needs. The district’s efforts at fiscal responsibility have helped produce the following<br />
results:<br />
The second lowest overall property tax rates in Central Texas for school districts<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Aaa debt rating from Moody’s Investors Service, AA+ from Standard & Poor’s, and AA from Fitch<br />
Ratings, which are among the highest ratings a Texas public school district can earn from these<br />
agencies. This has resulted in millions of dollars of savings for the district’s bond program and<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> taxpayers.<br />
A preliminary FY2012 School FIRST (Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas) rating of<br />
Superior Achievement for the ninth consecutive year.<br />
The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts awarded A<strong>ISD</strong> with a Gold Leadership Circle Award<br />
for budget transparency, three years in a row. Gold is the highest level achievable and requires<br />
multiple financial documents and a web page dedicated to financial transparency.<br />
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong> Presentation Award<br />
for nine years in a row.<br />
The GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for the second year in<br />
a row.<br />
The Association of School Business <strong>Official</strong>s International (ASBO) Meritorious <strong>Budget</strong> Award for<br />
excellence in the preparation and issuance of its school system budget for two years in a row.<br />
The ASBO Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting. This was the first year the district<br />
applied for the award.<br />
Number-one ranked school district in the nation for total amount of renewable energy purchased.<br />
Eighth largest purchaser of “green power” among all U.S. government entities.<br />
A Two-Star rating or higher from the <strong>Austin</strong> Energy Green Building Program for new schools,<br />
classroom additions and major renovations under the 2004 and 2008 bond programs.<br />
Strong Fund Balance<br />
Fund balance is the net difference between the assets and liabilities of a fund. In much the same way as<br />
a homeowner maintains a savings account for unexpected emergencies, having a healthy fund balance<br />
enables the district to cover operating costs during low cash periods. Further, the district saves millions of<br />
dollars as a result of securing lower interest rates through strong bond ratings. Ensuring an adequate<br />
reserve level is essential to maintaining high bond ratings and supporting unplanned needs and<br />
emergencies. The following table provides a ten-year history of the district’s reserve levels. A<strong>ISD</strong> will<br />
continue to maintain a prudent reserve of at least 14 percent of expenditures to ensure sound fiscal<br />
health. Beginning in FY2012, the district implemented the new requirement from GASB 54 to divide the<br />
fund balances into five different categories, including non-spendable, restricted, committed, assigned and<br />
unassigned.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 19
Millions<br />
$92<br />
$81<br />
$82<br />
$145<br />
$152<br />
$146<br />
$172<br />
$219<br />
$248<br />
$220<br />
The projected $184.6 million unassigned general fund balance is above the required policy of 14 percent<br />
but below slightly below the 2.5 months operating measure the state sets for optimal levels by $11.3<br />
million. The district had $148.3 million in reserves in FY2010 when A<strong>ISD</strong> first became triple-A rated. This<br />
excellent rating enables the district to achieve a substantial savings on debt interest. The administration<br />
believes the <strong>FY2013</strong> planned draw down will not impact the district’s credit rating as long as the district<br />
has a multi-year financial plan.<br />
300<br />
Table 13<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund - Fund Balance (In Millions)<br />
For a Period from FY2004 through <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
$120.6<br />
$129.9 $121.0<br />
$148.3<br />
$179.6<br />
$199.1<br />
$184.6<br />
100<br />
$66.5 $60.7 $57.9<br />
50<br />
0<br />
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Total General Fund Fund Balance<br />
Unassigned General Fund Fund Balance<br />
14.0% Requirement Optimal Cash Flow for 2.5 Months<br />
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST)<br />
The Texas Administrative Code (TAC), Title 19,§109.1001, states that the purpose of the financial<br />
accountability rating system is to ensure that school districts are held accountable for the quality of their<br />
financial management practices and achieve improved performance in the management of their financial<br />
resources. The system is designed to encourage Texas public schools to manage their financial<br />
resources better in order to provide the maximum possible allocation for direct instructional purposes. The<br />
system will also disclose the quality of local management and decision-making processes that impact the<br />
allocation of financial resources in Texas public schools. An evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of<br />
the system should disclose a measurable improvement in the quality of Texas public schools' financial<br />
decision-making processes. Since the inception of the FIRST rating system, the district has been rated<br />
Superior Achievement. This is the highest among five ratings: Superior Achievement, Above Standard<br />
Achievement, Standard Achievement, Substandard Achievement and Suspended.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 20
<strong>Budget</strong> Policies and Development Procedures<br />
The district is committed to increasing the level of transparency that surrounds a complex budget<br />
process. The Strategic Plan, which is the product of a genuine consensus-building process, and<br />
embodies the vision of the community, drives the annual budget process. The Board has established a<br />
policy that requires the district to maintain a minimum of 14 percent of operating expenditures in its<br />
general fund balance, which is a driving factor in the budgeting process.<br />
Developing the budget is an ongoing, annual, cyclical process. The Board of Trustees adopts the budget<br />
parameters annually in September and approves the budget calendar in October. In November, the<br />
Board reviews assumptions staffing formulas, enrollment projections, staffing guidelines and fund balance<br />
condition; determines strategic plan priorities; and takes action on the Annual Academic Facilities Master<br />
Plan Framework. In December, a multi-year financial forecast is presented, and the Board takes action on<br />
the Annual Academic Facilities Recommendations (AAFRs).<br />
The Superintendent established the <strong>Budget</strong> and Finance Advisory Committee (BFAC) to provide<br />
guidance and counsel on matters of budget and finance. The BFAC meets regularly, working alongside<br />
staff and others to develop tools and methodologies on how to best improve the district’s budgeting<br />
process. The administration has been responsive to BFAC’s recommendations for greater cohesion and<br />
clarity. The district’s budget development has become an integrated process that aligns resource<br />
allocation with goals and priorities established through the development of a well-defined curriculum, and<br />
a well-conceived and executed strategic planning process.<br />
In February, the Superintendent presents the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong> to the Board of Trustees, the public and<br />
the media. The Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong> provides a first glance of the investment plan for the upcoming school<br />
year. It evolves as the budget process advances and presents opportunities for input from key<br />
stakeholders including parents, students, citizens and staff. In March and April, the district holds<br />
interactive meetings with the community and staff regarding the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong> so additional input<br />
can be incorporated before the numbers are finalized.<br />
In April, the Board discusses the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong> and tax rate. After community, staff and Board<br />
feedback is incorporated, the Superintendent presents the Revised <strong>Budget</strong> to the Board. The district then<br />
conducts a public hearing on the Revised <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
In July, the Travis Central Appraisal District (TCAD) certifies the local appraisal values. Local revenue<br />
from property taxes comprises more than 80 percent of total revenue. A small percentage change in<br />
TCAD appraisal value estimates can create a material change in the amount of revenue A<strong>ISD</strong> expects to<br />
receive. The district incorporates the certified appraisal values and any other updated estimates, thus<br />
creating the Recommended <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
In June, the Superintendent presents the Recommended Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> to the Board, public, and<br />
media. The Board conducts a public hearing on the proposed budget and tax rate and then adopts the<br />
budget and tax rate. For <strong>FY2013</strong>, the Board of Trustees adopted the <strong>FY2013</strong> Governmental Funds<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> and <strong>FY2013</strong> tax rate on August 28, 2012.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 21
Table 14<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Milestones of the <strong>Budget</strong> Process<br />
Sept 2011 Board <strong>Budget</strong> Parameters Adopted April 2012 Community Conversation on<br />
the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Oct 2011 Board Approves <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Calendar<br />
Staff Conversation on<br />
the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Nov 2011 Board Reviews Assumptions,<br />
Staffing Formulas, Enrollment<br />
Board Discussion on Preliminary<br />
Projections, Staffing Guidelines<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> and Rate<br />
and Fund Balance Condition<br />
Board Determines Strategic Plan<br />
Priorities<br />
Superintendent presents the<br />
Revised <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> based<br />
on Community & Board Feedback<br />
Board Action on Facilities Master<br />
Plan Framework<br />
Public Hearing on <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revised <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Dec 2011 Revised Financial Forecast for May 2012 Travis Central Appraisal District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong>-2015<br />
provides Preliminary Appraisal<br />
Values<br />
Board Action on Annual Facilities<br />
Recommendations June 2012 Superintendent presents the<br />
Recommended <strong>FY2013</strong> to the<br />
Jan 2012 <strong>Budget</strong> Office Compiles <strong>Budget</strong> Board, Public and Media<br />
Feb 2012 Superintendent presents the Board Conducts Public Hearing<br />
Preliminary <strong>FY2013</strong> to the Board,<br />
on <strong>FY2013</strong> Recommended <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Public and Media<br />
Board Approval of <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Mar 2012 Community Conversation on Recommended Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong><br />
the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong><br />
July 2012 Travis Central Appraisal District<br />
Certifies Appraisal Values<br />
Aug 2012<br />
Board Conducts Public Hearing<br />
on Proposed <strong>Budget</strong> and Tax Rate<br />
Board Adopts the <strong>Budget</strong> and<br />
Tax Rate<br />
Texas Education Code, sections 44.002-44.006 establish the legal basis for school district budget<br />
development. The district’s budget must be prepared by a date set by the State Board of Education,<br />
which is currently August 20, and adopted by August 31. A public hearing for the budget and proposed<br />
tax rate must occur before the Board adopts the budget. The district’s budget must be legally adopted<br />
before the tax rate is adopted. As discussed in the preceding paragraphs, this budget document meets<br />
those standards.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 22
District<br />
Goals<br />
Goal # 1:<br />
All students will<br />
perform at or<br />
above grade<br />
level.<br />
Goal # 2:<br />
Achievement<br />
gaps among all<br />
student groups<br />
will be<br />
eliminated.<br />
Goal # 3:<br />
All students will<br />
graduate ready<br />
for college,<br />
career, and life<br />
in a globally<br />
competitive<br />
economy.<br />
Goal # 4:<br />
All schools will<br />
meet or exceed<br />
state<br />
accountability<br />
standards, and<br />
the district will<br />
meet federal<br />
standards and<br />
exceed state<br />
standards.<br />
Table 15<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Board Goals, Strategies to Achieve Goals and <strong>Budget</strong> Parameters<br />
How To<br />
Achieve The Goals<br />
1. Provide a high quality,<br />
well-rounded<br />
educational experience<br />
to all students that is<br />
rigorous, culturally<br />
relevant, healthful, and<br />
engaging.<br />
2. Build strong<br />
relationships with<br />
students, families, and<br />
the community to<br />
increase trust and<br />
shared responsibility.<br />
3. Ensure that every<br />
classroom has a highquality,<br />
effective<br />
educator, supported by<br />
high-quality, effective<br />
administrators and<br />
support staff.<br />
4. Align resources to<br />
accomplish priorities<br />
within a balanced<br />
budget.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Parameters<br />
1. The Board seeks to maintain an unassigned fund balance<br />
consistent with district policy in an effort to (1) maintain a bond<br />
rating of Aaa or higher, (2) a “Superior” financial rating from the<br />
State and to (3) ensure a sufficient operating reserve to support<br />
operating costs for at least two months.<br />
2. The Board recognizes its fiduciary responsibility to adopt a balanced<br />
budget and will seek to do so by considering all cost savings and<br />
efficiency options.<br />
3. If projected expenditures exceed projected revenue and budget<br />
reductions become necessary, the district will first seek those<br />
options that are sustainable and will address structural imbalances<br />
on a multi-year basis. One-time solutions, including the use of fund<br />
balance reserves will be considered with caution and appropriately<br />
factored into out-year deficits.<br />
4. The district will continue to pursue additional revenue, costs savings<br />
and efficiencies; and will work to reduce investments into<br />
programming that hasn’t shown sufficient results.<br />
5. The budget will prioritize investments that are aligned with our<br />
Strategic Goals as outlined in the Strategic Plan:<br />
All students will perform at or above grade level.<br />
Achievement gaps among student groups will be<br />
eliminated.<br />
All students will graduate ready for college, career and life<br />
in a globally competitive economy.<br />
All schools will meet or exceed state accountability<br />
standards, and the district will meet federal standards and<br />
exceed state standards.<br />
6. We recognize the need to target resource investments into<br />
programming that supports achievement growth for all schools.<br />
Therefore any new budgetary investments will reflect the Strategic<br />
Priorities established by the Board.<br />
7. The performance results from the District’s Performance<br />
Management System which includes: the Districtwide Balanced<br />
Scorecard, Strategic Plan Monitoring tools, program evaluations,<br />
electronic dashboards, operational Key Performance Indicators<br />
(KPIs) and individual employee evaluations will be used to make<br />
budgetary decisions in an effort to establish a budget that is<br />
performance-driven and based on proven results.<br />
8. The budget process must be transparent and include sufficient<br />
opportunity for community engagement and feedback.<br />
9. The Board seeks to maintain competitive total compensation levels<br />
for all classes of employees and will consider such<br />
recommendations as long as they are sustainable.<br />
10. <strong>Budget</strong>ed assumptions for staffing ratios must meet State standards<br />
unless a waiver is sought from the State.<br />
11. The budget should be developed in a multi-year framework<br />
(minimum three years) to account for out-year implications of<br />
budget proposals and revenue estimates.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 23
Board Priorities for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
College, Career, Life Readiness<br />
Financial Structure & Basis for Accounting<br />
The district maintains more than 100 funds to account for its operations and special programs. Each fund<br />
varies in purpose. All funds are accounted for on a district-level basis.<br />
The fund accounting system defines each fund by fiscal period and a self-balancing set of accounts<br />
including assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenue and expenditures. There are four major fund groups. The<br />
Governmental Funds includes the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds and<br />
Capital Projects Funds. Other funds maintained by the district include Internal Service Funds and<br />
Fiduciary Funds.<br />
Formal budgetary accounting is employed for all required Governmental Fund Types, as outlined in<br />
TEA's Financial Accountability System Resource Guide (FAR), and is presented on the modified accrual<br />
basis of accounting consistent with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The budget is<br />
prepared and controlled at the function level within each organization to which responsibility for controlling<br />
operations is assigned.<br />
The basis of budgeting and the basis of accounting are maintained on a modified accrual basis as<br />
prescribed by GAAP, with revenues being recognized in the accounting period in which they become<br />
available and measurable and expenditures being recognized in the accounting period in which the fund<br />
liability is incurred (as services are rendered). The only exception applies to unmatured interest on<br />
general long-term debt, which shall be recognized when due. The basis of budgeting and accounting for<br />
the district are built on the accounting code structure presented in the Account Code Section of the TEA<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 24
Resource Guide, with funds, revenues and expenditures being the integral parts of the mandated account<br />
coding. Funds shall be classified and identified on budgets and financial statements by the same code<br />
number and terminology provided in the Account Code section of the TEA Resource Guide. Revenues<br />
shall be recorded on a gross basis and shall be classified by fund, source (object code), fiscal year and<br />
where fiscal integrity (separate accountability) is necessary, by program and/or project. Expenditures or<br />
expenses shall be classified by fund, function, object, organization, fiscal year and program intent.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary controls, which employ encumbering purchase orders to reserve commitments to the budget,<br />
include budget amendments to ensure compliance with state laws.<br />
Account Code Structure<br />
Section 44.007 of the Texas Education Code requires that a standard fiscal accounting system be<br />
adopted by each school district. The system must meet at least the minimum requirements prescribed by<br />
the State Board of Education and also be subject to review and comment by the state auditor.<br />
Additionally, the accounting system must conform to GAAP. The following 20-digit account codes are<br />
mandated throughout all public school districts in Texas.<br />
Fund Function Object Sub-Object Organization Fiscal Yr Program Intent<br />
(3 digits) (2 digits) (4 digits) (2 digits) (3 digits) (1 digit) (2 digits) blank<br />
X X X - X X - X X X X - X X - X X X - X - X X - X XX<br />
Major<br />
FUND<br />
CODE<br />
(1XX –<br />
8XX)<br />
Account<br />
Groups<br />
(9XX)<br />
Detail<br />
Major<br />
Detail<br />
FUNCTION<br />
CODE<br />
(11-99)<br />
Major<br />
Account<br />
Classification<br />
Detail<br />
OBJECT EXPENSE CODE<br />
Assets (1XXX)<br />
Liabilities (2XXX)<br />
Fund Equity (3XXX)<br />
Clearing Accounts (4XXX)<br />
Revenue/Income (5XXX)<br />
Expenditures/<br />
Expenses (6XXX)<br />
Other Resources/Non-<br />
Operating Revenues/<br />
Residual Equity<br />
Transfers<br />
In (7XXX)<br />
Other Uses/Non-<br />
Operating<br />
Revenues/Residual<br />
Equity Transfers<br />
Out (8XXX)<br />
LOCAL<br />
OPTION<br />
CODES 1<br />
and 2<br />
(XX)<br />
ORGANIZATION<br />
CODE<br />
(XXX)<br />
FISCAL<br />
YEAR<br />
CODE<br />
(0-9)<br />
PROGRAM<br />
INTENT CODE<br />
(11-99)<br />
Indicates a mandatory code<br />
for State reporting<br />
purposes.<br />
Indicates a code that may<br />
be used at location option.<br />
LOCAL<br />
OPTION<br />
CODES<br />
3; 4 & 5<br />
(X; XX)<br />
The 20-digit account code includes fund, function, object, local option codes 1 and 2, organization, fiscal<br />
year, program intent codes and local option codes 3, 4 and 5. The solid lines indicate mandatory coding<br />
whereas dotted lines indicate local optional coding. The account code defines transaction detail. It will tell<br />
the reader what was generally purchased, which campus or department made the purchase, the purpose<br />
of the purchase and the major source of funds that was used.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 25
<strong>Budget</strong> Challenges<br />
In 2011, for the first time in 60 years, the Texas Legislature failed to fully fund the Foundation School<br />
Program. Faced with a substantial budget shortfall, the 82nd Legislature reduced state formula funding to<br />
public school districts and eliminated funding for a host of grant programs in its biennial FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> state budget. These reductions total $5.4 billion compared to what school districts would have<br />
earned during the same two-year period under the prior funding levels.<br />
The impact of these cuts will be felt across the state for many years. A recent survey conducted by Moak<br />
Casey and Associates indicates that responding school districts have 11,833 fewer staff members than<br />
they would have had under the previous level of funding. Extrapolated statewide, this data suggests<br />
Texas school districts are employing an estimated 32,000 fewer staff today than they would have without<br />
the recent funding cuts. Most districts surveyed also anticipate additional staff losses next year.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> also has struggled during these tough times. The district lost about $37.5 million in funding in<br />
FY2012 and had to implement a reduction in force that resulted in the elimination of 1,153 positions. A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
will lose approximately $59.1 million in <strong>FY2013</strong> which is an additional $21.6 million from the prior year,<br />
which has been factored into the adopted budget, for a total of $96.6 million in losses this fiscal biennium.<br />
Finally, state budget language that eliminates the districts “hold harmless” funding translates to a total<br />
loss of about $150 million for <strong>Austin</strong> between FY2012 and FY2018.<br />
Many districts across the state are considering litigation as a means to work toward overall structural<br />
improvements to the Texas system of school finance, and a broad-based, unified group of school districts<br />
is prepared to challenge the current system to bring about change that will benefit Texas students. The<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees unanimously adopted a resolution to join a school finance lawsuit filed by<br />
Thompson & Horton LLP. The Board believes that the claims brought in this suit are most closely aligned<br />
with the goals and priorities of A<strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
A History of Financial Challenges: A Multi-Year Strategy<br />
The district has managed through several years of financial austerity:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2005 Legislature, 3rd called session - HB1 (FY2007) froze school district revenues at FY2006<br />
levels without compensating for inflation. Annually, this means A<strong>ISD</strong> must absorb $18-21 million<br />
in inflationary costs with no additional funding.<br />
2009 Legislature (FY2010 & FY2011) provided minimal relief, giving districts an extra $120 per<br />
weighted student, or $12 million in revenue for A<strong>ISD</strong>. But the legislature required staff raises,<br />
which cost A<strong>ISD</strong> $13 million.<br />
2011 Legislative (FY2012 & <strong>FY2013</strong>) made unprecedented cuts to public school funding.<br />
Multi-year financial planning has been crucial in managing district finances in the face of a challenging<br />
budget climate, which has included a decline in the district's tax base, operational deficits, state funding<br />
cuts, and expiring federal funding, all while navigating through a sluggish economy.<br />
To improve the ability to manage the district's financial condition over time, the Board in December 2009<br />
began to look at multi-year fiscal forecasts for A<strong>ISD</strong>. At that time, the district's spending was escalating at<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 26
an annual average of nearly 7 percent, exceeding the rate of student growth, inflation and projected<br />
revenue. These escalating expenditures, coupled with reductions in state and federal funding and rising<br />
costs for healthcare, utilities and other inflationary factors, created a structural imbalance in the district's<br />
budget.<br />
In response to these fiscal challenges, A<strong>ISD</strong> has been austerity planning for the past three years.<br />
During FY2010, 18 central office positions were eliminated, which saved more than $700,000. A central<br />
office hiring freeze saved the district more than $1.5 million.<br />
During FY2011, the district cut $27 million from the central office budget by:<br />
Eliminating more than 100 positions and enacting a hiring freeze<br />
Restricting travel and curtailing operating expenses<br />
Eliminating paper pay checks<br />
Moving towards self-insurance<br />
Undertaking other cost-savings measures, including implementing a one-week shut down and a<br />
10-hour/four-day work week in July to save on energy costs and other operational expenses<br />
In order to address FY2012 state aid reductions, the Board of Trustees adopted a Declaration of Financial<br />
Exigency as precursor to a reduction in force effective. As a result, the district was able to implement an<br />
aggressive Deficit Management Plan, which included the elimination of 1,153 positions, allowing the<br />
district to offset a reduction of $37.5 million in state funds, a loss of nearly $64 million in federal stimulus<br />
funds and a reduction of $20 million in state grants.<br />
Savings from the personnel cuts, however, were not sufficient to cover the projected FY2012 deficit,<br />
which required the district to implement other cost-savings measures, including, but not limited to:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Imposing hiring freezes and 30-day wait periods to fill non-essential positions in central<br />
departments<br />
Increasing employee contributions for the same level of health coverage<br />
Reducing departmental budgets and support for professional development travel and food<br />
Implementing a one-week shut down and a 10-hour/four-day work week in July<br />
Reducing programmatic funding for programs such as athletics, summer school and school<br />
turnaround initiatives<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 27
Table 16<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Savings from Cuts, Cost Avoidance and Revenue Measures<br />
$14,564,721<br />
$32,239,105<br />
$30,824,483<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
Resource Capacity to Support a Fast-Growing and Diverse Student Population<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is experiencing significant population growth at the same time that the district faces unprecedented<br />
losses in state and federal revenue. During the past five years, the number of students in A<strong>ISD</strong> has<br />
increased by 6 percent. A<strong>ISD</strong> now serves approximately 87,000 students, about 5,000 more than<br />
attended A<strong>ISD</strong> in FY2008. On average, the district continues to grow by about 850 students per year – at<br />
a rate two-to-three times faster than the state’s student population, which itself is growing at a faster rate<br />
than the nation’s student population.<br />
While many neighboring districts are also serving more students each year, much of the new growth in<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is among economically disadvantaged students. The demographic makeup of the district’s student<br />
population has shifted, and our changing student population is more costly to serve. The district must<br />
establish new delivery models and support strategies in order to educate an increasingly diverse student<br />
population with the following characteristics:<br />
2 in 3 A<strong>ISD</strong> students qualify for free-and-reduced lunch;<br />
1 in 3 A<strong>ISD</strong> students speak a first language other than English; and<br />
1 in 10 A<strong>ISD</strong> students has a learning or other disability.<br />
Other Challenges<br />
Several other budget factors also have an impact on the district’s financial position:<br />
<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is considered “property-wealthy” under the states “recapture” law, which requires the district<br />
to send $135.2 million to the state for redistribution to property-poor school districts in FY2012. In<br />
FY2012, A<strong>ISD</strong> will remit 20 percent of every penny of tax revenue generated locally to the state.<br />
Over the last 10 years, A<strong>ISD</strong> has paid the almost $1.4 billion in recapture payments, all of which<br />
comes from tax dollars generated in <strong>Austin</strong>. For more on recapture, please see pages 35-36.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 28
A<strong>ISD</strong> is among a handful of Texas school districts required to participate in two retirement<br />
programs — the federal Social Security system, and the Teacher Retirement System of Texas.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> incurs approximately $33 million per year in employer Social Security taxes; this is a cost<br />
most other Texas school districts do not have to bear.<br />
The district's participation in Social Security is not universally popular among teachers. Teachers<br />
with more experience tend to view it favorably because of the extra support it provides, while<br />
teachers with less experience tend to view it as a negative because it represents a hit to their<br />
paychecks.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Our district is changing. The district has experienced significant changes in demography over the<br />
past ten years. While our student population has grown by 11 percent, our economically<br />
disadvantaged student population has grown by 28 percent. Approximately 64 percent of<br />
students qualify for free or reduced lunch; our English language learner population has grown by<br />
44 percent and currently comprises 29 percent of our student enrollment. We have seen a<br />
significant growth in our Hispanic students and a slight decrease in our African American and<br />
White student populations.<br />
In order to close the digital divide, A<strong>ISD</strong> must make greater investments in its technology<br />
infrastructure. The Strategic Plan goals necessitate considerable advances in the technology<br />
available in the classrooms for both teacher and student use.<br />
Maintenance spending falls short. While A<strong>ISD</strong> completes the 2004 and 2008 Apple at Work Bond<br />
Programs, the district falls short in funding routine maintenance. The American Schools and<br />
Universities benchmark per-square-foot maintenance cost is $5.49 compared to the $3.17 persquare-foot<br />
investment by A<strong>ISD</strong>. An additional investment of $35.4 million would be necessary to<br />
bring the district to this basic maintenance funding level.<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> Assumptions<br />
Multiple assumptions were used to build the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. The following assumptions impact<br />
the <strong>FY2013</strong> revenue:<br />
• Decrease of $59.1 million in General Fund state aid from prior HB3646 levels.<br />
• Expiring Edujobs funding offset by an increase of $4.5 million in Medicaid collections<br />
• Increase in students in average daily attendance (ADA) and the weighted count of students in<br />
ADA (WADA). Substantial increase in WADA due to methodology state used to pass down cuts.<br />
• Assumes increase in collectability at a rate of 99 percent consistent with FY2012 collections<br />
• Assumes no change in the M&O and I&S tax rate at this time.<br />
• The district will continue to discuss the possibility of Tax Ratification Election to generate<br />
additional recurring revenue for future year budgets.<br />
• Amends the A<strong>ISD</strong> historic property tax exemption program with recent program modifications<br />
approved by the <strong>Austin</strong> City Council to effectively cap the historic exemption at $3,500 for<br />
properties that are designated or change owners after December 31, 2011.<br />
• Proposes use of $28 million in General Fund reserves, which would leave an estimated $184.6<br />
million unreserved/unassigned. This would still allow the district to stay within policy and at a level<br />
consistent with FY2010 when A<strong>ISD</strong> became ‘triple-A” rated.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 29
<strong>Budget</strong> Analysis<br />
General Fund<br />
Pays for salaries and benefits, classroom resources, campus cleaning and landscaping, transporting<br />
students, paying utility bills, providing clerical and administrative support – all the things schools and<br />
support centers need to operate on a daily basis.<br />
Food Service Fund<br />
Pays for the operation of the district’s food service program.<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
Pays the debt on bonds previously approved by district voters for building construction and renovation.<br />
Special Revenue Fund (Grants)<br />
Accounts for the proceeds of specific revenue sources such as federal categorical, state or locally<br />
financed programs where unused balances are returned to the grant. These funds are tied to specific<br />
programmatic deliverables and expenditure restrictions.<br />
Capital Projects Fund<br />
Pays for construction and renovation projects in district facilities.<br />
Special Revenue Funds and Capital Project Funds are provided for informational purposes only. Special<br />
Revenue Funds are approved separately by the Board of Trustees when final grant awards are made.<br />
Capital Projects Funds have been previously authorized through the bond election process.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 30
Fund Structure Diagram<br />
All Funds<br />
Governmental Fund Types<br />
Propriety Fund Types<br />
Fiduciary Fund Types<br />
Internal Service Funds<br />
Agency Funds<br />
General Fund Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund<br />
OFFICIALLY ADOPTED FUNDS (See Note 1)<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
General Fund Food Service Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund<br />
Note 1: The audited financial statements of the School District include all funds as shown in the “All Funds”<br />
structure Diagram above. However, the Texas Education Agency requires only the adoption of the General Fund,<br />
Food Service Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service Fund in August.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 31
Major Funds<br />
Table 17<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Major Funds<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2012<br />
Major Funds<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
Governmental<br />
Adopted Total<br />
Capital<br />
Projects<br />
Major Federal<br />
Grants<br />
Proprietary<br />
Funds<br />
Revenues<br />
5700 Local Sources $810,754,556 $ 787,058,513 $ 10,400 $ - $ 73,413,573 $ 860,482,486<br />
5800 State Sources 171,448,575 111,405,434 - - - $ 111,405,434<br />
5900 Federal Sources 114,118,596 52,046,828 - 61,263,964 - 113,310,792<br />
Combined Fund Revenue Total $1,096,321,727 $950,510,775 $10,400 $61,263,964 $73,413,573 $1,085,198,712<br />
Expenditures<br />
11 Instruction $453,365,672 $ 432,107,452 $ - $ 34,703,005 $ - $ 466,810,457<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Services 11,434,085 10,785,702 - 204,801 - 10,990,503<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development 23,527,289 16,394,100 - 9,801,868 - 26,195,968<br />
21 Instructional Administration 12,154,316 10,194,410 - 2,040,461 - 12,234,871<br />
23 School Administration 48,654,972 47,911,053 - 2,417,416 - 50,328,469<br />
31 Guidance & Counseling Services 22,929,690 19,694,749 - 4,130,138 - 23,824,887<br />
32 Attendance & Social Work Services 4,030,496 2,906,651 - 345,794 - 3,252,445<br />
33 Health Services 6,102,113 6,131,553 - 88,360 - 6,219,913<br />
34 Pupil Transportation 24,918,580 27,109,548 - 700,000 - 27,809,548<br />
35 Food Services 38,297,927 39,245,441 - - - 39,245,441<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities 13,327,498 13,376,167 - 313,480 - 13,689,647<br />
41 General Administration 85,992,227 18,248,506 - 285,599 73,413,573 91,947,678<br />
51 Plant Maintenance 80,748,877 80,564,129 2,005,423 27,035 - 82,596,587<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services 9,583,726 9,897,984 - 13,610 - 9,911,594<br />
53 Data Processing Services 17,878,914 17,803,638 20,055 942,998 - 18,766,691<br />
61 Community Services 7,788,792 4,627,381 - 5,249,399 - 9,876,780<br />
71 Debt Services 96,967,282 103,621,679 - - - 103,621,679<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 71,454,890 1,320,000 32,635,685 - - 33,955,685<br />
91 Contracted Instructional Srvcs-Public Schools 135,176,524 111,739,859 - - - 111,739,859<br />
93 Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 1,233,902 1,658,106 - - - 1,658,106<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges 4,717,540 4,164,661 - - - 4,164,661<br />
Combined Fund Expenditure Total $ 1,170,285,312 $ 979,502,769 $ 34,661,163 $ 61,263,964 $ 73,413,573 $ 1,148,841,469<br />
Net Revenue Over (Under) $ (73,963,585) $ (28,991,994) $ (34,650,763) $ - $ - $ (63,642,757)<br />
Other Sources (Uses)<br />
7900 Other Resources 51,000 51,000 - - - 51,000<br />
8900 Other Uses (81,000) (81,000) - - - (81,000)<br />
Net Sources Over (Under) $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ - $ - $ - $ (30,000)<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Net Revenue/Sources Over (Under) $ (73,993,585) $ (29,021,994) $ (34,650,763) $ - $ - $ (63,672,757)<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase orders and<br />
unspent balances at year end $ 30,067,804 $ - $ 28,250,911 $ - $ - $ 28,250,911<br />
Total<br />
Beginning Fund Balance (Estimated) $ 272,886,155 $ 277,672,346 $ (74,001,628) $ - $ 25,289,656 $ 228,960,374<br />
Ending Fund Balance (Estimated) 228,960,374 248,650,352 (136,903,302) - 25,289,656 193,538,528<br />
Less Assigned Balance (48,983,942) (35,530,274) - - - (35,530,274)<br />
Ending Funding Balance - Unassigned $ 179,976,432 $ 213,120,078 $ (136,903,302) $ - $ 25,289,656 $ 158,008,254<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 32
Table 18<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Major Funds Percent of Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong><br />
For School Year 2013<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Fund Type<br />
Percent<br />
Governmental Funds 979,502,769 85%<br />
Capital Projects 34,661,163 3%<br />
Major Federal Grants 61,263,964 5%<br />
Proprietary Funds 73,413,573 6%<br />
1,148,841,469 100%<br />
Governmental<br />
Funds<br />
85%<br />
Capital Projects<br />
3%<br />
Major Federal<br />
Grants<br />
5%<br />
Proprietary<br />
Funds<br />
7%<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
The budget that the Board is required to take action on is comprised of the three primary funds, known as<br />
the Governmental Funds, which are the General Fund, Food Service Fund, and Debt Service Fund. The<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> total governmental expenditures are projected to be $979.5 million. The total revenues for these<br />
funds are approximately $950.5 million. The planned deficits will be covered with the fund balance<br />
reserves. Revenue is expected to decrease by $21.9 million or 2.25 percent and expenditures will<br />
increase by $5.2 million or 0.54 percent over the prior year adopted budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 33
Table 19<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2012<br />
Governmental<br />
Adopted Total<br />
General Fund<br />
Food<br />
Service Fund<br />
Debt<br />
Service Fund<br />
Revenues<br />
5700 Local Sources $742,072,311 $ 677,368,777 $ 8,392,715 $ 101,297,021 $ 787,058,513<br />
5800 State Sources 171,448,575 110,259,107 1,146,327 - 111,405,434<br />
5900 Federal Sources 58,916,699 20,386,584 30,675,778 984,466 52,046,828<br />
Combined Fund Revenue Total $972,437,585 $808,014,468 $40,214,820 $102,281,487 $950,510,775<br />
Expenditures<br />
11 Instruction $419,734,596 $ 432,107,452 $ - $ - $ 432,107,452<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Services 11,321,673 10,785,702 - - 10,785,702<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development 16,259,504 16,394,100 - - 16,394,100<br />
21 Instructional Administration 9,795,691 10,194,410 - - 10,194,410<br />
23 School Administration 46,812,796 47,911,053 - - 47,911,053<br />
31 Guidance & Counseling Services 18,726,353 19,694,749 - - 19,694,749<br />
32 Attendance & Social Work Services 2,970,687 2,906,651 - - 2,906,651<br />
33 Health Services 5,946,564 6,131,553 - - 6,131,553<br />
34 Pupil Transportation 24,488,580 27,109,548 - - 27,109,548<br />
35 Food Services 38,297,927 - 39,245,441 - 39,245,441<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities 13,262,821 13,376,167 - - 13,376,167<br />
41 General Administration 17,064,813 18,248,506 - - 18,248,506<br />
51 Plant Maintenance 78,925,932 79,012,294 1,551,835 - 80,564,129<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services 9,577,526 9,897,984 - - 9,897,984<br />
53 Data Processing Services 17,244,095 17,803,638 - - 17,803,638<br />
61 Community Services 4,426,066 4,627,381 - - 4,627,381<br />
71 Debt Services 96,967,282 877,565 - 102,744,114 103,621,679<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 1,320,000 1,320,000 - - 1,320,000<br />
91 Contracted Instructional Srvcs-Public Schools 135,176,524 111,739,859 - - 111,739,859<br />
93 Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 1,233,902 1,658,106 - - 1,658,106<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges 4,717,540 4,164,661 - - 4,164,661<br />
Combined Fund Expenditure Total $ 974,270,872 $ 835,961,379 $ 40,797,276 $ 102,744,114 $ 979,502,769<br />
Net Revenue Over (Under) $ (1,833,287) $ (27,946,911) $ (582,456) $ (462,627) $ (28,991,994)<br />
Other Sources (Uses)<br />
7900 Other Resources 51,000 51,000 - 51,000<br />
8900 Other Uses (81,000) (81,000) - (81,000)<br />
Net Sources Over (Under) $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ - $ - $ (30,000)<br />
Net Revenue/Sources Over (Under) $ (1,863,287) $ (27,976,911) $ (582,456) $ (462,627) $ (29,021,994)<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase orders and<br />
unspent balances at year end $ 30,064,925<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Total<br />
Beginning Fund Balance (Estimated) $ 249,470,708 $ 248,072,693 $ 8,760,016 $ 20,839,642 $ 277,672,346<br />
Ending Fund Balance (Estimated) 277,672,346 220,095,782 8,177,560 20,377,015 248,650,352<br />
Less Assigned Balance (48,983,942) (35,530,274) - - (35,530,274)<br />
Ending Funding Balance - Unassigned $ 228,688,404 $ 184,565,508 $ 8,177,560 $ 20,377,015 $ 213,120,078<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Expenditures 23% 22% 20% 20% 22%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 34
Table 20<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> for Three Primary Funds and Recapture<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Food Service<br />
40,797,276<br />
4%<br />
General Fund<br />
724,221,520<br />
74%<br />
Chapter 41<br />
111,739,859<br />
11%<br />
Debt Serivice<br />
102,744,114<br />
11%<br />
The General Fund constitutes the largest portion of the Governmental Funds, representing $724.2 million,<br />
or 74 percent, when recapture is included. Recapture, or Chapter 41, constitutes the next largest share at<br />
$111.7 million or 11 percent. The Debt Service Fund represents 11 percent and the Food Service Fund<br />
represents 4 percent of the Governmental Funds.<br />
What is Recapture?<br />
Recapture, which represents 11 percent of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>’s governmental funds, is a function of Chapter 41<br />
of the Texas Education Code, which equalizes educational spending across school districts that have<br />
varying amounts of property wealth. The Chapter 41 provision recaptures local tax dollars from “propertyrich”<br />
districts and redistributes the funds to “property-poor” districts. Under this law, “golden pennies”<br />
represent the 6 cents that property-rich school districts like A<strong>ISD</strong> are allowed to retain in revenue above<br />
the one-dollar tax that is assessed on all taxable property values. Any revenue collected on property<br />
taxes above these 6 cents is subject to recapture by the state. In other words, in FY2012, nearly 45.3<br />
percent of the revenue generated beyond the 6 cents is sent to the state for redistribution to property-poor<br />
school districts. In FY2012, nearly one fifth or 20 percent of all local revenue collected from property taxes<br />
is subject to recapture. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the district projects a slight reduction in recapture; approximately 16.7<br />
percent of all local revenue collected will be subject to Recapture and 43 percent of the revenue<br />
generated beyond the 6 cents will be subject to Recapture.<br />
In FY2012, it is projected that A<strong>ISD</strong> will submit $135.2 million to the state in recapture funds. This amount<br />
is expected to decrease in <strong>FY2013</strong> by $23.5 million for a total of $111.7 million as a result of projected<br />
increases in the district’s WADA, which was reduced by the state in FY2012 as part of the methodology<br />
that was used by the legislature to appropriate cuts in the first year of the fiscal biennium. Although the<br />
district will submit less in recapture payments to the state, the total revenue A<strong>ISD</strong> collects will shrink to a<br />
much larger degree. During the past 10 years, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> has paid the State of Texas almost $1.4 billion<br />
in recapture payments.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 35
Table 21<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Recapture Payments Compared to General Fund Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong><br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
$1,000,000,000<br />
$800,000,000<br />
$600,000,000<br />
$400,000,000<br />
$200,000,000<br />
$0<br />
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Total GF <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Chapter 41 Payments<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 36
General Fund<br />
General Fund: Where the Money Comes From<br />
The General Fund is the largest of the funds that A<strong>ISD</strong> manages. The General Fund is used to support<br />
the operation of the school system and is comprised of three major sources: local, state, and federal. The<br />
General Fund is commonly referred to as the “Operating Fund” or “Local Maintenance Fund”. State aid<br />
and local property tax revenue are major sources of revenues for this fund.<br />
Local Funding<br />
Local funding consists of property taxes for the current year or prior years, investment earnings, athletic<br />
activities revenue, insurance recovery, grants, and school bonds. Local revenue accounts for $677.4<br />
million or 83.8 percent of all available sources of funding for the <strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund budget. Of this<br />
amount, the largest source of revenue is $671.6 million in local property taxes, which is derived from the<br />
current and delinquent property tax payments. The <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> predicts a 6.1 percent<br />
increase in total local revenue sources as compared to the prior year FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
State Funding<br />
State funding is based on a complex formula, determined by the legislature, which considers the number<br />
of students served, and is based on poverty levels, attendance rates, special programs, bilingual factors,<br />
taxable property wealth, and other factors. State revenue accounts for $110.3 million, or 13.6 percent of<br />
the total revenues of the General Fund budget. State funding will decrease by $60 million, or 35.3 percent<br />
from the prior FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. Of the $110.3 million in state revenue, approximately $30 million<br />
are TRS on behalf payments, which are not part of the state funding formula. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will<br />
actually pay more to the state than it will receive in state aid due to the changes in the school funding<br />
formula passed by the previous legislature.<br />
Federal Funding<br />
Federal funding, reflected in the General Fund, constitutes earnings from indirect cost from federal grant<br />
expenditures, and revenues received for school health and related services (SHARS), a Medicaid<br />
reimbursement program. The district has limited flexibility in how it spends federal revenue (and a portion<br />
of state revenue). Federal sources account for $20.4 million or 2.5 percent of the total revenue of the<br />
General Fund budget. The largest source of federal funding is the School Health and Related Services<br />
program, which represents $18 million. The district will not receive any additional funding in <strong>FY2013</strong> from<br />
the one year Edujobs Grant, which provided $13.8 million in federal revenue in FY2012. Federal revenue<br />
is estimated to decrease by $8.7 million or 29.9 percent from the prior year adopted budget as a result of<br />
this loss.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 37
Table 22<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Funding / Revenue Sources – General Fund<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data from Prior Year<br />
Revenue Source<br />
FY2012 Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% of <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Revenue $ Change % Change<br />
Local Revenue $ 638,484,837 $ 677,368,777 83.8% $ 38,883,940 6.1%<br />
State Revenue 170,302,248 110,259,107 13.6% (60,043,141) -35.3%<br />
Federal Revenue 29,085,672 20,386,584 2.5% (8,699,088) -29.9%<br />
Total 837,872,757 808,014,468 100.0% (29,858,289) -3.6%<br />
Less: Recapture 135,176,524 111,739,859 13.8% (23,436,665) -17.3%<br />
Operating Revenue $ 702,696,233 $ 696,274,609 86.2% $ (6,421,624) -0.9%<br />
Table 23<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund Revenue Sources<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Local Revenue<br />
83.8% State Revenue<br />
13.6%<br />
Federal Revenue<br />
2.5%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 38
Changes from the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
To the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
As a result of budget actions taken over the past three years, district reserves are now sufficient to cover<br />
the anticipated <strong>FY2013</strong> deficit and to stabilize staffing. The <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> includes a one-time<br />
compensation adjustment for all regular employees equivalent of a 3 percent increase, since salaries<br />
have been frozen for the last two fiscal years. The <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> also includes increased<br />
expenditures resulting from the implementation of the Annual Academic and Facilities Recommendations,<br />
support for continuing and new Strategic Plan investments and escalating baseline costs for expenditures<br />
such as healthcare, energy and fuel. Details of the increases and decreases from the FY2012 Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> to the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> are listed on pages 43-45.<br />
Addressing Human Capital<br />
Due to budget challenges, salaries in A<strong>ISD</strong> have been frozen for two years (FY2011 and FY2012), while<br />
most surrounding districts have frozen salaries for only one year. As a result, retaining and attracting high<br />
quality staff is becoming more challenging as the gap between A<strong>ISD</strong> salaries and those of surrounding<br />
districts continues to widen. A recent analysis indicates that, excluding the value of the district’s Social<br />
Security contributions, A<strong>ISD</strong> teacher salaries are 3.6 percent lower than those in other central Texas<br />
school districts, including Round Rock, Eanes and Pflugerville, and 11.3 percent lower than those in<br />
Houston, Dallas and other urban districts. A<strong>ISD</strong> teacher salaries are 9.5 percent lower than teachers in<br />
districts identified as peers under the state's school district efficiency and performance rating system --<br />
the Financial Allocation Study for Texas (FAST).<br />
Teacher Salary Comparison with Local districts (Excludes Social Security Tax)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 39
Teacher Salary Comparison with Local Districts (Includes Social Security Tax)<br />
6.2 percent Added to <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> for Comparison Purposes<br />
This gap continues to widen as most districts have taken actions to increase salaries for next year. To<br />
maintain ground, the district has implemented a two-year compensation strategy that provides at least the<br />
equivalent of a 3 percent salary increase for the next two years. The <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> includes<br />
costs to support payment allotments to all employees for one year only, to provide the equivalent of a 3<br />
percent increase (non-recurring), which will cost an estimated $14.2 million. This payment will be funded<br />
out of district reserves.<br />
If the Board approves, the district will need to make an additional payment of $14.6 million in FY2014<br />
from reserves to cover this action in the subsequent year. While reserve levels are strong, the district<br />
would only be able to sustain two years of payments unless revenue levels are increased considerably. If<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> voters chose to approve a tax rate increase through a Tax Ratification Election (TRE) in the future,<br />
the district could effectuate the salary increase and make it permanent for all employees.<br />
Implementing the Annual Academic and Facilities Recommendations (AAFRs)<br />
In December 2011, the Board of Trustees approved all six of the AAFRs presented by the<br />
Superintendent.<br />
1. Expand Dual Language Immersion Programs to four additional schools<br />
The recommended delivery model for this scenario is the establishment of:<br />
• One (1) one-way Chinese dual language immersion program at Doss Elementary School; and<br />
• Three (3) two-way Spanish dual language immersion programs at Blanton, Casey and Galindo<br />
elementary schools.<br />
2. Address North Central elementary schools overcrowding<br />
• Move 6th grade students at Barrington and Brown elementary schools to Webb Middle School.<br />
• Move 6th grade students at Walnut Creek Elementary School to Dobie Middle School.<br />
• Create a pre-kindergarten center at Dobie Middle School; and reassign Pre-K students from<br />
Graham and Hart elementary schools to Dobie Middle School.<br />
• Create a Pre-K through 8 th grade model at Webb Middle School, using a phased process.<br />
• Reassign remaining Barrington Elementary School Pre-K students to Reilly Elementary School.<br />
• Reassign Barrington Elementary School students residing in the southeast portion of the current<br />
attendance zone, roughly bounded by E. Walnut Drive on the north, IH 35 on the east, E<br />
Anderson Lane on the south and Georgian Drive on the west to the proposed Webb Pre-K-8<br />
School<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 40
3. Redesign Learning Support Centers/Disciplinary Placement<br />
• Through a new delivery model, operate a Learning Support Center that will serve all mandatory<br />
removals and only those discretionary removals where the student is considered a safety<br />
concern.<br />
• If an outside provider is not identified, A<strong>ISD</strong> will continue serving students using the Learning<br />
Support Center model.<br />
• Students removed from the classroom for discretionary reasons will be served on their home<br />
campuses.<br />
4. Designate the North Central Area of the District for the location of the undesignated 2008 Bond<br />
Program Elementary School<br />
5. Establish a Graduation Pathways Education Program, In-District Charter School with Responsive<br />
Education Solutions<br />
The recommended delivery model for this scenario is an in-district charter program agreement with<br />
Responsive Education Solutions serving Travis and Lanier high schools.<br />
6. Establish a College Preparation, In-District Charter School with IDEA Public Schools<br />
The recommended delivery model for this scenario is a contractual agreement with IDEA Public<br />
Schools for a K-12 college preparatory, in-district charter program. This college preparatory design<br />
emphasizes core curriculum, core values and a no-excuse, results-driven culture that prepares<br />
students for success in college and citizenship by developing the academic, social, and leadership<br />
skills students need to be successful.<br />
Strategic Plan Investments<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is committed to implementing, monitoring and executing the Strategic Plan framework. As we enter<br />
the third year of this process, funding the initiatives in the Strategic Plan will remain a major goal in the<br />
budget process. Increases have been incorporated into the <strong>FY2013</strong> budget to support Strategic Plan<br />
outcomes.<br />
Many of the proposed increases will support programming that was already in place but previously funded<br />
with grants that are now expiring. The district is now allocating local resources to maintain support for<br />
important programming, including the Twilight Schools, which operate during non-traditional hours to<br />
serve students at risk of dropping out; the Early College programs at LBJ and Reagan high schools; and<br />
tutoring services.<br />
There are several new Strategic Plan investments being proposed that will strengthen the district’s ability<br />
to meet Board Priorities for <strong>FY2013</strong>. The new Strategic Plan investments includes the implementing a<br />
dual-phase dyslexia program, increasing the number of kindergarten through 2 nd grade students reading<br />
at or above grade level, providing support for the Social and Emotional Learning Program, creating a<br />
substitute custodial pool to meet school-level housekeeping needs, allotting funds to the Texas Virtual<br />
School Network and increasing the number of air conditioner mechanics and plumbers to reduce the work<br />
order backlog and reduce overtime pay.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 41
Continuing to Increase District Efficiency and Capacity<br />
There are a number of initiatives included in the budget that will allow the district to increase its efficiency.<br />
Energy<br />
Last summer, the district launched an aggressive energy savings program by implementing a one-week<br />
shut down and a 10-hour/four-day work week in July. The district saved around $334,000 in FY2011. In<br />
FY2012, the district realized approximately an 8.7 percent savings during the first five months of the fiscal<br />
year and anticipates an overall average of 5 percent savings by year end.<br />
The City of <strong>Austin</strong> and <strong>Austin</strong> Energy had a very public debate about increasing the energy rates. <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Energy proposed increasing the base electric rates for the first time since 1994. The <strong>Austin</strong> City Council<br />
approved a new residential and commercial structure with an increased rate structure. Beginning in<br />
October 2012, the district is anticipating paying higher energy rates to <strong>Austin</strong> Energy. The district is<br />
hopeful lower temperatures and increased efficiency will help off-set the higher energy rates. The adopted<br />
budget includes an increase of $69,052 to support a sustainability coordinator to implement energy<br />
savings throughout the district and reduce future costs.<br />
Resource Development<br />
As discussed in the Strategic Partnerships and Development section, A<strong>ISD</strong> has begun to seek alternative<br />
and private donors to support ongoing and future needs. The district would like to employ an additional<br />
grant writer to support a higher volume of grant-writing. An evaluation analyst is also needed, because<br />
most grant applications require an expertly designed evaluation and/or research plan, logic model, and a<br />
creation and/or review of data collection instruments and materials. These positions could support the<br />
submission of an additional $10 million in proposals for the district, which would more than offset the<br />
additional cost of $172,000 to fund the new positions.<br />
Health and Wellness<br />
In FY2011, the district became self-insured under its benefits plan. This essentially means that the district<br />
bears the cost and risks associated with its employee health plan. Even though this saves the district an<br />
estimated $13 million, A<strong>ISD</strong> must implement efforts to contain future healthcare costs, which can escalate<br />
annually between 10 percent and 12 percent.<br />
Beginning in <strong>FY2013</strong>, the district will implement a wellness program that will focus on efforts to reduce or<br />
prevent disease severity and treatment costs through early detection. According to the Wellness Council<br />
of America, every dollar invested in wellness saves a company $3 in healthcare costs. If A<strong>ISD</strong> invested<br />
$1.3 million during a three-year period, this could result in a return of approximately $3.9 million. This<br />
investment will be funded with proceeds from the health fund reserves and will result in a zero net effect<br />
on the General Fund budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 42
Table 24<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures<br />
From the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Revenue<br />
1 Decrease in State Aid $ (60,043,141)<br />
2 Decrease in Education Jobs funding $ (13,798,672)<br />
3 Increase in tax levy, current and prior years $<br />
37,689,358<br />
4 Increase in the School Health Reimbursement Program (SHARS) $<br />
4,523,989<br />
5 Increase in Tuition and Fees $<br />
870,955<br />
6 Increase in Federal Indirect Costs $<br />
563,595<br />
7 Other $<br />
284,627<br />
Net Change in Revenues $ (29,909,289)<br />
Expenditures<br />
A Employee Payments<br />
One-time 3% compensation adjustment for all regular employees $<br />
14,160,000<br />
B New Delivery Models/Implementing the Annual Academic and Facilities<br />
Recommendations (AAFRs)<br />
1 North Central elementary schools overcrowding $<br />
1,444,371<br />
2 Dual Language Immersion Programs to four additional schools $<br />
191,192<br />
3 In-District Charter: Graduation Pathways Education Program $<br />
1,023,512<br />
4 In-District Charter: IDEA Allan College Preparation $<br />
323,445<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
2,982,520<br />
C Additions For Continuing Strategic Plan Initiatives<br />
5 Provide early Pre-K registration so that students are enrolled and have access to<br />
free/reduced lunch on the first day of school. Pre-K testing materials. $<br />
151,000<br />
6 Addition AIMS web licenses to include grades 3 through 9 $<br />
246,063<br />
7 Continue funding the Twilight Program at its north and south campus. The program has<br />
been successful in reclaiming dropouts and providing an evening school option for<br />
students to reclaim/accelerate course credits and meet graduation requirements. To<br />
date, participating students have reclaimed 808 credits, and 177 students have<br />
graduated. $<br />
780,045<br />
8 Continue supporting the Schoolnet Instructional Management System after the grant<br />
expires. $<br />
71,404<br />
9 Continue supporting external service providers and their grantors so that they can<br />
monitor the outcomes of students that are served by their programs, maintaining<br />
National Student Clearinghouse data for post secondary enrollment, and the Substance<br />
Use and Safety Survey once grants expire. $<br />
53,450<br />
10 Expand the existing ACE program for 35 tutors to 80 tutors who will serve students at a<br />
third of A<strong>ISD</strong>'s elementary campuses. ACE tutors provide small group and whole class<br />
research and early literacy intervention. $<br />
300,000<br />
11 Bus monitors for Uphaus ECC bus transportation $<br />
243,000<br />
12 Continue supporting multicultural outreach initiatives through contracted programming<br />
such as radio shows, parental engagement, support for multiple languages in addition to<br />
Spanish, and support educational fairs. $<br />
159,000<br />
13 Anderson Vertical Team to implement "One World Schools," based on the tenants of the<br />
International Baccalaureate Organization. $<br />
288,658<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
2,292,620<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 43
Table 24 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures<br />
From the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
D New Strategic Plan Investments<br />
14 Implement a dual-phase dyslexia program that includes a dyslexia specialist, multi<br />
sensory reading program materials, and training. $<br />
128,000<br />
15 Increase the number of K-2 students reading at or above grade level with the addition of<br />
10 Primary Literacy Campus Specialists. $<br />
849,490<br />
16 Provide clerical support for the Social and Emotional Learning Program $<br />
25,000<br />
17 Create a substitute hiring pool for custodians to keep up with school level housekeeping<br />
needs. $<br />
130,504<br />
18 Allot funding for the Texas Virtual School Network (TxVSN), which allows students to take<br />
online courses for high school credit. $<br />
70,000<br />
19 Additional A/C mechanics and plumbers to reduce the work order backlog and reduce<br />
overtime pay. $<br />
284,663<br />
Sub-total $<br />
1,487,657<br />
E Statutorily Required or Contractually Obligated<br />
20 Plan for projected increase in special education student enrollment and PPCD<br />
increases. In FY2012, there was an increase of 497 students in special education and<br />
a 25% increase in students requiring PPCD services. $<br />
1,618,954<br />
21 Conduct summer retesting for an additional grade as required under new state<br />
$<br />
110,000<br />
assessment requirements for end-of-course test takers.<br />
22 Provide transportation services for students retaking end-of-course assessments and $<br />
150,000<br />
STAAR exit-level in July 2013.<br />
23 Provide transportation services for three additional student days of instruction (district<br />
calendar change) $<br />
180,000<br />
24 Fund increased annual fees imposed by the Greater <strong>Austin</strong>/Travis Regional Radio<br />
System for radio communications used by bus transportation, police, school<br />
administrators, emergency management and maintenance. $<br />
20,000<br />
25 Pay the increasing cost of high school graduations, including the first class of seniors at<br />
the Ann Richards school, and summer school graduates. $<br />
36,282<br />
26 Fund increased enrollment and participation in the Early College High School Program<br />
at LBJ & Reagan high schools. Up to 1,800 students could enroll to earn dual credit<br />
from <strong>Austin</strong> Community College. $<br />
320,000<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
2,435,236<br />
F Revenue Generating or Cost Avoidance<br />
27 Hire a district-wide Sustainability Coordinator to analyze energy use and implement<br />
measures to reduce utility usage and increase energy efficiency and environmental<br />
sustainability, which will reduce operating expenditures in the long term. $<br />
69,052<br />
28 Tuition based Pre-K program $<br />
70,955<br />
29 IDEA Allan Buy Back Services (offset by revenue to be collected from IDEA) $<br />
256,781<br />
30 Hire an additional grant writer to support the submission of an additional $10 million in<br />
grant proposal submission for the district. $<br />
80,000<br />
31 Hire an additional FTE to provide additional assessment data and evaluation planning for<br />
the grant development process $<br />
92,000<br />
32 Implementation of a district-wide Health and Wellness initiative to contain future<br />
healthcare costs<br />
Cost Neutral<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
568,788<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 44
Table 24 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures<br />
From the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
G Baseline Increases<br />
33 New school operating impact costs (Uphaus ECC) $<br />
1,088,283<br />
34 Wastewater $<br />
468,684<br />
35 Enrollment growth $<br />
4,044,934<br />
36 Health insurance increase $<br />
3,372,438<br />
37 Gasoline and fuels for student transportation $<br />
894,483<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
9,868,822<br />
Total Additions $<br />
33,795,643<br />
H Reductions In <strong>Budget</strong><br />
38 Decrease in Chapter 41 estimate $ (23,436,665)<br />
39 Other budget reductions to achieve savings $ (12,898,329)<br />
Total Reductions $ (36,334,994)<br />
Net Change in the Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> $<br />
(2,539,352)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 45
Tax Rates<br />
As discussed previously, the vast majority of the district’s funds come from local sources, mainly local tax<br />
collections. A key component of local revenue estimation is taxable values. The tax collections from local<br />
property values are the largest source of income for the district. There are two types of tax rates set. The<br />
Maintenance and Operation (M&O), the rate applied to the tax base to support the General Fund <strong>Budget</strong>,<br />
and the Interest & Sinking (I&S) tax rate, the rate applied to the tax base to cover the bonds approved by<br />
taxpayers.<br />
The M&O tax rate supports the major operational and education programs of the district while the I&S tax<br />
rate supports the repayment of bonded debts that were authorized by <strong>Austin</strong> voters. In this budget, the<br />
tax rate for <strong>FY2013</strong> will remain at $1.079 per $100 of assessed value for M&O and the I&S tax rate will<br />
remain at $0.163. The total tax rate for <strong>FY2013</strong> will be $1.242. Debt service payments, which total $102.7<br />
million, will increase by $6.8 million from FY2012 levels.<br />
Table 25<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> & Tax Rate for M&O and I&S<br />
Includes Recapture<br />
M&O - Salaries, utilities, supplies, maintenance, equipment, etc.<br />
I&S - Capital improvements, land, buses, new school buildings<br />
$102,744,114<br />
I&S Tax Rate<br />
$0.163<br />
M&O Tax Rate<br />
$1.079<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
Construction Projects<br />
School Buildings<br />
$835,961,379<br />
General Fund<br />
Teacher/Support staff<br />
salaries<br />
Supplies & Materials<br />
Contracted Supplies<br />
Equipment<br />
Transportation<br />
Recapture<br />
Utilities<br />
M&O<br />
I&S (Debt)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 46
Combined Tax Rate<br />
1.5000<br />
1.5000<br />
1.5000<br />
1.5000<br />
1.3700<br />
1.0400<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
Prior to FY2007, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> had set the M&O tax rate at $1.50 for four consecutive years. HB1<br />
compressed the M&O to $1.33 in FY2007 and to $1.00 in FY2008. The district was allowed to increase<br />
the tax rate up to six cents above the compressed rate without being subject to recapture. HB1 changed<br />
the tax rate structure to require that any M&O tax increase above $1.04 would require tax ratification from<br />
voters. The voters approved an M&O tax rate increase of $0.039 in the FY2009 school year.<br />
1.8000<br />
1.6000<br />
1.4000<br />
1.2000<br />
Table 26<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Tax Rate History<br />
1.5964 1.6137 1.6230 1.6230<br />
1.4930<br />
1.1630 1.2020 1.2020 1.2270 1.2420 1.2420<br />
1.0000<br />
0.8000<br />
0.6000<br />
0.4000<br />
0.2000<br />
0.0000<br />
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Maintenance & Operations Interest & Sinking<br />
To property homeowners, a higher tax rate might result in a higher tax bill. The following table illustrates<br />
the average current and historical market value of a residence in relation to tax rate and tax levy. The<br />
difference between the average market value of a residence and the average taxable value can be a<br />
combination of any of the following exemptions:<br />
State mandated homestead exemption of $10,000<br />
Local over-65 exemption of $25,000<br />
Local disabled exemption of $15,000<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 47
Table 27<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Analysis of Tax Burden per Travis Central Appraisal District (TCAD)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
FY2010<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
FY2011<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
FY2012<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Median Market Value of Residence $ 222,549 $ 215,174 $ 210,065 $ 208,234<br />
Median Taxable Value 194,430 195,361 192,980 191,358<br />
Tax Rate per $100 Value 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242<br />
Tax Levy on Median Residence 2,337 2,397 2,397 2,377<br />
Net Increase In Tax Levy 60 (0) (20)<br />
Avg Market Value of Residence $ 277,663 $ 265,573 $ 261,793 $ 262,167<br />
Avg Taxable Value 248,405 245,593 243,966 244,534<br />
Tax Rate per $100 Value 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242<br />
Tax Levy on Average Residence 2,986 3,013 3,030 3,037<br />
Net Increase In Tax Levy 28 17 7<br />
As illustrated in the table above, there is a significant difference between the average residential median<br />
value and the residential average market value in relationship to residential property values and their<br />
respective tax levy. In general, median residential values tend to illustrate a more accurate representation<br />
of residential values since they are not skewed by the most expensive outlier residential values. For<br />
example, if there were nine residences valued at $200,000 and one residence valued at $1,000,000 the<br />
median home value would be $200,000 and the average home value would be $280,000.<br />
Median Home Value Analysis - Taxes to fund programs and services for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year will<br />
decrease by an estimated $20 for the median homeowner due to a slight decrease in the median value.<br />
This is based on a residence’s median market value of $208,234 (with a median taxable value of<br />
$191,358) in <strong>FY2013</strong> at a tax rate of $1.242/per $100 assessed value. This is a slight decrease when<br />
compared to the median prior year FY2012 market value of $210,065 (with average taxable value of<br />
$192,980) at the same tax rate of $1.242/per $100. Based on preliminary values as of May 2012, the tax<br />
bill in FY2012 for a $210,065 home will be $2,397 and the tax bill in <strong>FY2013</strong> for the same home (now<br />
valued at $208,234) will be $2,377.<br />
Average Home Value Analysis - Taxes for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year will increase by an estimated $7 for<br />
the average homeowner due to a slight increase in the average market value. This is based on a<br />
residence’s average market value of $262,167 (with average taxable value of $244,534) in <strong>FY2013</strong> at a<br />
tax rate of $1.242/per $100 assessed value. This is a slight increase when compared to the average prior<br />
year FY2012 market value of $261,793 (with average taxable value of $243,966) at the same tax rate of<br />
$1.242/per $100. Based on the certified values as of July 2012, the tax bill in FY2012 for a $261,793<br />
home will be $3,030 and the tax bill in <strong>FY2013</strong> for the same home (now valued at $262,167) will be<br />
$3,037.<br />
The state limits how much a school district can increase its tax rate from the previous year. Each taxing<br />
entity must calculate its rollback rate. The rollback rate is the maximum rate that can be adopted before<br />
an automatic rollback election takes place. If the district adopts a tax rate that is higher than the rollback<br />
rate, voters can either affirm the proposed higher rate through an election or roll it back to the rollback<br />
rate. Also, individual property value increases are capped annually at 10 percent. Despite the increase<br />
that was approved by voters in FY2009, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> had the second lowest tax rate in FY2012 when<br />
compared to other local school districts in the metro area.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 48
$1.6000<br />
$1.4000<br />
$1.2000<br />
$1.0000<br />
$0.8000<br />
$0.6000<br />
$0.4000<br />
$0.2000<br />
$-<br />
$1.2125<br />
Eanes <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Table 28<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Central Texas School District Property Tax Rates<br />
M&O<br />
I&S<br />
$1.242<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.380<br />
Round<br />
Rock <strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.4075<br />
Lake<br />
Travis <strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.4613<br />
Hays<br />
C<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.481<br />
Bastrop<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.5119<br />
Leander<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.515<br />
Manor<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.530 $1.540<br />
Del Valle<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pfluger<br />
ville <strong>ISD</strong><br />
I&S $0.1725 $0.1630 $0.3400 $0.3675 $0.4213 $0.4410 $0.4719 $0.4750 $0.4900 $0.5000<br />
M&O $1.0400 $1.0790 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400<br />
Property Values<br />
Over the last ten years, the district’s taxable value growth has averaged 5.2 percent. The largest growth<br />
was in 2006 when the certified taxable value increased 14.4 percent and the smallest was in 2004 when<br />
the taxable property value decreased 3.9 percent. The net taxable property value for the A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
will increase by $2.2 billion or 3.9 percent over FY2012. Future year forecasts through FY2015 indicate<br />
property tax values will gradually increase with an annual growth rate ranging from 2.2 percent to 2.4<br />
percent.<br />
Increases in home values generally lead to higher tax bills. Texas law limits the amount that a house<br />
value can increase from one year to the next. Under the state’s 10 percent appraisal cap policy, even if a<br />
home value goes up by more than 10 percent in one year, the homeowner will not have to pay a tax<br />
increase beyond the 10 percent in that one-year period.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 49
Billions<br />
2003 Certified<br />
2004 Certified<br />
2005 Certified<br />
2006 Certified<br />
2007 Certified<br />
2008 Certified<br />
2009 Certified<br />
2010 Certified<br />
2011 Certified<br />
2012 Certified<br />
2013 Projected<br />
2014 Projected<br />
Table 29<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Net Taxable Value Projection (After Freeze)<br />
Travis Central Appraisal District (TCAD)<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
41.826<br />
44.525<br />
40.192 38.928<br />
50.570<br />
56.267 57.795 56.281 56.875 59.111 60.504<br />
61.822<br />
20<br />
10<br />
-<br />
Tax Year<br />
The 2012 certified tax levy is calculated from the net taxable value at a 99 percent collection rate. The<br />
above table represents the historical net taxable value for the last ten years, the current fiscal year and<br />
future projections.<br />
Taxes for homeowners age 65 years or older are “frozen” under a local provision that prevents their<br />
property tax payments from rising, regardless of what happens to their property values or district tax<br />
rates. The combination of the net taxable value levy and the levy on frozen values equals the total levy for<br />
the year, and is reflected in the following table.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 50
Taxable Values<br />
Table 30<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Total Tax Levy<br />
Forecasts<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014 FY2015<br />
Net Taxable Value (before freeze) $ 64,460,255,568 $ 61,570,945,154 $ 61,870,932,381 $ 64,852,952,572 $ 65,904,376,265 $ 67,222,463,790<br />
Less: Freeze Taxable Value $ (6,665,559,231) $ (5,290,263,882) $ (4,995,488,245) $ (5,742,370,929) $ (5,400,000,000) $ (5,400,000,000)<br />
Net Taxable Value (after freeze) $ 57,794,696,337 $ 56,280,681,272 $ 56,875,444,136 $ 59,110,581,643 $ 60,504,376,265 $ 61,822,463,790<br />
Increase (Decrease) Over Prior Year $ 1,528,112,380 $ (1,514,015,065) $ 594,762,864 $ 2,235,137,507 $ 1,393,794,622 $ 1,318,087,525<br />
% Increase (Decrease) Over Prior Year 2.7158% -2.6196% 1.0568% 3.9299% 2.3579% 2.1785%<br />
Net Taxable Levy $ 694,692,250 $ 690,563,959 $ 706,393,016 $ 734,153,424 $ 751,464,353 $ 767,835,000<br />
Freeze Ceiling Taxes $ 30,106,823 $ 28,405,788 $ 32,000,000 $ 37,600,000 $ 37,600,000 $ 37,600,000<br />
Total Levy $ 724,799,073 $ 718,969,747 $ 738,393,016 $ 771,753,424 $ 789,064,353 $ 805,435,000<br />
% Actual Collections to Levy 97.80% 97.80% 97.80% 99.00% 99.00% 99.00%<br />
Tax Rates<br />
Local Maintenance 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079<br />
Debt Service 0.123 0.148 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163<br />
Total 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242 1.242 1.242<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed Tax Levies<br />
Local Maintenance $ 636,316,905 $ 618,338,593 $ 627,373,664 $ 663,763,869 $ 678,652,522 $ 692,732,465<br />
Debt Service $ 72,536,589 $ 84,813,820 $ 94,774,706 $ 100,272,021 $ 102,521,187 $ 104,648,185<br />
Total $ 708,853,493 $ 703,152,413 $ 722,148,370 $ 764,035,890 $ 781,173,710 $ 797,380,650<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 51
On January 1 of each year, property<br />
values are rendered for appraisal.<br />
The appraisal process is conducted<br />
by the Travis Central Appraisal<br />
District (TCAD). TCAD is scheduled<br />
to submit preliminary values to the<br />
school district by May 1 on an annual<br />
basis. These values are usually a<br />
conservative estimate of the ultimate<br />
certified values that are released on<br />
or before July 25. Once the certified<br />
values are received by the district, the<br />
budget process and tax rate adoption<br />
can be completed for the upcoming<br />
school year. The following table is a<br />
recap of the schedule for certification<br />
of the appraisal roll and school district<br />
budget adoption.<br />
Congress Avenue Bridge,<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
Table 31<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Schedule for Certification of the Appraisal Roll<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Estimated Taxable Value Increase Rate – 3.9 percent<br />
2012 TCAD Certified Taxable Value (A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong>) - $59.111 billion<br />
TCAD and A<strong>ISD</strong> Schedule<br />
January<br />
January-March<br />
May<br />
July<br />
August<br />
August<br />
Rendition Date<br />
Appraisal Process is conducted by TCAD<br />
TCAD provides school district preliminary values<br />
TCAD provides school district certified tax values<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Hearing<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Board adopts budget and tax rate<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 52
Where the Money Goes<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> continues to ensure that resources are spent primarily on support for schools and students.<br />
Approximately 59.7 percent of the General Fund revenue is allocated directly towards instruction (shown<br />
below). A significant portion of A<strong>ISD</strong>’s budget is also spent on maintenance and facilities. General<br />
Administration represents just 2.5 percent of the General Fund budget.<br />
General<br />
Administration<br />
2.5%<br />
Guidance &<br />
Counseling<br />
Services 2.7%<br />
Table 32<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> by Functional Area (General Fund)<br />
Data Processing<br />
Services 2.5%<br />
Curriculum & Staff<br />
Development<br />
2.3%<br />
Pupil<br />
Transportation<br />
3.7%<br />
School<br />
Administration<br />
6.6%<br />
Plant<br />
Maintenance<br />
10.9%<br />
Instruction<br />
59.7%<br />
Instruction<br />
School Administration<br />
Guidance & Counseling Services<br />
Data Processing Services<br />
Co-Curricular Activities<br />
Instructional Administration<br />
Health Services<br />
Other Intergovernmental Charges<br />
Payments-Shared Services Arrangements<br />
Debt Services<br />
Plant Maintenance<br />
Pupil Transportation<br />
General Administration<br />
Curriculum & Staff Development<br />
Instructional Resources & Media Services<br />
Security & Monitoring Services<br />
Community Services<br />
Attendance & Social Work Services<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 53
A Comparison of the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
General Fund expenditures will decrease $2.5 million or approximately 0.3 percent from the FY2012<br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. The net decrease results from a $14.2 million increase for a nonrecurring employee<br />
payment allotment to provide the equivalent of a 3 percent increase, a $3 million increase for Annual<br />
Academic and Facilities Recommendations (AAFRs), $3.8 million increase in strategic plan investments,<br />
$568,788 in revenue generating or cost avoidance expenditures, $12.3 million increase in baseline and<br />
statutorily increases, $23.4 million decrease in recapture payments, and $12.9 million in other budget<br />
reductions.<br />
General Fund revenue is expected to<br />
decrease by $29.9 million from the<br />
FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. The net<br />
decrease results from an increase of<br />
approximately $38.9 million in local<br />
revenue sources, a decrease of $60<br />
million in state sources and a decrease<br />
of $8.7 million in federal sources. The<br />
decrease in state and federal revenue<br />
is somewhat offset by an increased<br />
Certified Local Property Tax Valuation.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong><br />
When the Chapter 41 payments are excluded from revenue, A<strong>ISD</strong> will retain $696.3 million in operating<br />
revenue to support district functions for <strong>FY2013</strong>, as compared to the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> operating<br />
revenue of $702.7 million. The decrease in the Chapter 41 expenditure helps offset the large decrease in<br />
state aid. This represents a decrease of 0.91 percent or $6.4 million in operating revenue for the district in<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 54
Table 33<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
Variance with<br />
Prior Year<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
% Variance with<br />
Prior Year<br />
Adopted<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 664,832,840 $ 653,112,865 $ 638,484,837 $ 677,368,777 $ 38,883,940<br />
6.09%<br />
State Sources 126,019,476 162,678,023 170,302,248 110,259,107 (60,043,141) -35.26%<br />
Federal Sources 38,219,854 42,432,291 29,085,672 20,386,584 (8,699,088) -29.9%<br />
Total Revenues 829,072,170 858,223,179 837,872,757 808,014,468 (29,858,289) -3.56%<br />
Expenditures by Function<br />
Current<br />
Instruction 397,551,020 399,301,376 419,734,596 432,107,452 12,372,856 2.95%<br />
Instructional Resources & Media Services 12,652,232 12,248,753 11,321,673 10,785,702 (535,971) -4.73%<br />
Curriculum & Staff Development 16,995,999 14,310,972 16,259,504 16,394,100 134,596 0.83%<br />
Instructional Administration 10,800,228 9,673,934 9,795,691 10,194,410 398,719 4.07%<br />
School Administration 46,634,597 46,971,582 46,812,796 47,911,053 1,098,257 2.35%<br />
Guidance & Counseling Services 19,054,858 19,417,443 18,726,353 19,694,749 968,396 5.17%<br />
Attendance & Social Work Services 2,893,886 3,040,796 2,970,687 2,906,651 (64,036) -2.16%<br />
Health Services 5,132,193 5,744,568 5,946,564 6,131,553 184,989 3.11%<br />
Pupil Transportation 25,474,229 26,441,452 24,488,580 27,109,548 2,620,968 10.70%<br />
Co-Curricular Activities 14,604,097 14,532,159 13,262,821 13,376,167 113,346 0.85%<br />
General Administration 17,124,548 16,532,883 17,064,813 18,248,506 1,183,693 6.94%<br />
Plant Maintenance 80,180,361 77,751,820 77,374,097 79,012,294 1,638,197 2.12%<br />
Security & Monitoring Services 9,466,965 9,028,580 9,577,526 9,897,984 320,458 3.35%<br />
Data Processing Services 17,841,016 18,498,506 17,244,095 17,803,638 559,543 3.24%<br />
Community Services 5,605,139 5,389,892 4,426,066 4,627,381 201,315 4.55%<br />
Debt Services 1,129,300 1,129,400 1,046,903 877,565 (169,338) -16.18%<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction 2,528,017 2,101,455 1,320,000 1,320,000 - 0.00%<br />
Contracted Instructional Srvc.-Public Schools 111,937,679 123,774,675 135,176,524 111,739,859 (23,436,665) -17.34%<br />
Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 1,700,441 1,658,106 1,233,902 1,658,106 424,204 34.38%<br />
Other Intergovernmental Charges 3,953,241 4,150,819 4,717,540 4,164,661 (552,879) -11.7%<br />
Total Expenditures 803,260,046 811,699,171 838,500,731 835,961,379 (2,539,352) -0.3%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
25,812,124 46,524,008 (627,974) (27,946,911) (27,318,937)<br />
4350.33%<br />
Other Financing Sources (Uses)<br />
Other Resources 196,725 80,025 51,000 51,000 - 0.00%<br />
Other Uses (109,050) (73,387) (81,000) (81,000) - 0.0%<br />
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 87,675 6,638 (30,000) (30,000) - 0.0%<br />
Net Change in Fund Balances 25,899,799 46,530,646 (657,974) (27,976,911) (27,318,937) 4151.98%<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase orders and<br />
unspent balances at year end 30,064,925<br />
Fund Balances- September 1 (Beginning) 146,235,297 172,135,096 218,665,742 248,072,693 29,406,951 13.4%<br />
Fund Balances - August 31 (Ending) 172,135,096 218,665,742 248,072,693 220,095,782 (27,976,911) -11.3%<br />
Less Assigned Fund Balance (23,808,573) (39,038,247) (48,983,942) (35,530,274) 13,453,668 -27.5%<br />
Ending Fund Balance - Unassigned 148,326,523 179,627,495 199,088,751 184,565,508 (14,523,243) -7.3%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Expenditures<br />
18% 22% 24% 22%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 55
Food Service Fund<br />
The Food Service Fund accounts for the operation of the district’s cafeteria meal program. The Food<br />
Service program includes a Food Service Fund expenditure budget of $40.1 million and a Food Service<br />
Summer Program budget of $682,914 for a total of $40.8 million.<br />
Revenue to support the Food Service program is generated from local, state and federal sources. Local<br />
sources account for $8.4 million or 20.9 percent of the total revenue for Food Services. Local sources<br />
include earnings from investments and fees collected from sales of meals to students and staff for<br />
breakfast and lunch.<br />
State sources account for $1.1 million or 2.9 percent of the total revenue for Food Services. They include<br />
direct financial assistance payments from the TEA.<br />
Federal sources account for $30.7 million or 76.2 percent of the total revenue for Food Services. The<br />
National School Lunch Program generates $22.3 million or 72.6 percent of the federal sources. This<br />
program is administered by the Texas Department of Agriculture which passes monies through the TEA<br />
to support the school district’s breakfast and lunch programs.<br />
The Food Service Summer program receives funding from the Department of Human Services, based on<br />
the average number of daily participants. This program has a budget of $682,914 for both revenue and<br />
expenditure budgets.<br />
For the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year, the Food Service expenditure budget of $40.8 million exceeds the Food<br />
Service revenue budget of $40.2 million by an amount of $582,456. The balance of the shortfall will be<br />
supported from the Food Service reserve funds which will have an ending fund balance of approximately<br />
$8.2 million.<br />
Breakfast prices for <strong>FY2013</strong> will remain constant from the prior four years. Lunch prices for <strong>FY2013</strong> were<br />
increased slightly from $2.15 to $2.25 for elementary lunch and from $2.30 to $2.40 for secondary lunch.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is aware the economic downturn still impacts many families in <strong>Austin</strong> and strives to keep meal<br />
prices affordable while also maintaining a balanced Food Services budget.<br />
A Comparison of the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Total Food Services revenue will increase by $1 million from the prior year. Local sources of revenue are<br />
expected to increase by $166,179 or 2 percent and the state budgeted funding levels will remain the<br />
same. Federal revenue will increase approximately $844,751 million or 2.8 percent from the <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
To commensurate with revenue, expenditures will increase $947,514 or 2.4 percent from the prior year<br />
adopted budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 56
Table 34<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Food Service Funds<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
% Variance<br />
with FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
Recommended<br />
over Adopted<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 7,827,956 $ 7,624,437 $ 8,226,536 $ 8,392,715 $ 166,179 2.0%<br />
State Sources 1,063,672 1,125,924 1,146,327 1,146,327 - 0.0%<br />
Federal Sources 28,338,890 29,610,386 29,831,027 30,675,778 844,751 2.8%<br />
Total Revenues 37,230,518 38,360,747 39,203,890 40,214,820 1,010,930 2.6%<br />
Expenditures by Function<br />
Current<br />
Food Services 35,552,459 37,665,777 38,297,927 39,245,441 947,514 2.5%<br />
Plant Maintenance 789,975 839,944 1,551,835 1,551,835 - 0.0%<br />
Total Expenditures 36,342,434 38,505,721 39,849,762 40,797,276 947,514 2.4%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of<br />
Revenues Over Expenditures<br />
888,084 (144,974) (645,872) (582,456) 63,416 -9.8%<br />
Other Financing Sources (Uses)<br />
Other Resources - - - - - -<br />
Other Uses - - - - - -<br />
Total Other Financing<br />
Sources (Uses)<br />
- - - - - -<br />
Net Change in Fund<br />
Balances<br />
Fund Balances- Sept.1<br />
(Beginning)<br />
888,084 (144,974) (645,872) (582,456) 63,416 -9.8%<br />
8,662,778 9,550,862 9,405,888 8,760,016 (645,872) -6.9%<br />
Fund Balances - Aug. 31 (Ending)<br />
$ 9,550,862 $ 9,405,888 $ 8,760,016 $ 8,177,560 $ (582,456) -6.6%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of<br />
Total <strong>Budget</strong> Expenditures<br />
26% 24% 22% 20%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 57
Debt Service Fund<br />
The Debt Service Fund accounts for all bonded debt payments, including principal, interest and fees.<br />
Major sources of revenues are from local property taxes levied for bonded debt payment purposes.<br />
Interest earnings contribute a relatively minor source of additional revenue for this fund. As of the<br />
beginning of <strong>FY2013</strong>, excluding commercial paper, the district projects an outstanding debt balance of<br />
$749.6 million. The district is currently planning to convert $100 million in commercial paper to long term<br />
fixed debt in January 2013.<br />
The total revenues and other resources for the Debt Service Fund for <strong>FY2013</strong> are $102.3 million and total<br />
expenditures and other uses are $102.7 million. Debt Service revenues are projected to increase<br />
approximately $6.9 million from the prior year. The district is anticipating an increase of $5.8 million in<br />
current year property tax revenues as a result of higher appraised property values and an increased<br />
collection rate. A<strong>ISD</strong> will spend an additional $14.62 million on bond interest, but $7.8 million less in bond<br />
principal when compared to the prior year. The budget for the <strong>FY2013</strong> Debt Service Fund will have a<br />
deficit of $462,627. A minimum fund balance of $10 million must be maintained in the Debt Service Funds<br />
to cover required investments associated with the district’s Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB)<br />
program. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the I&S tax rate of 0.163 per $100 of assessed property value will remain<br />
unchanged from FY2012. By law, the district must set its tax rate at a level that will generate enough<br />
revenue to cover the debt obligations that are authorized by the voters. Debt service revenues are<br />
expected to increase $6.9 million, or 7.3 percent and expenditures are expected to increase by $6.8<br />
million or 7.1 percent as compared to the prior year.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 58
Table 35<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Earnings from Investments $ 284,511 $ 307,657 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - 0.0%<br />
Penalty & Interest 377,582 412,842 330,000 400,000 70,000 21.2%<br />
Taxes- Prior Years 372,885 486,876 325,000 425,000 100,000 30.8%<br />
Taxes-Current Year 74,389,079 87,334,669 94,505,938 100,272,021 5,766,083 6.1%<br />
Total Revenues from Local Sources 75,424,057 88,542,044 95,360,938 101,297,021 5,936,083 6.2%<br />
FEDERAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Building America Bond Subsidy - 886,020 - 984,466 984,466 -<br />
Total Revenues from Federal Sources - 886,020 - 984,466 984,466 -<br />
TOTAL REVENUE 75,424,057 89,428,064 95,360,938 102,281,487 6,920,549 7.3%<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
Bond Principal 45,112,633 52,617,633 58,697,347 50,898,305 (7,799,042) -13.3%<br />
Bond Interest 34,671,258 35,122,926 36,148,032 50,770,809 14,622,777 40.5%<br />
Other Debt Serv Fees 418,768 893,547 1,075,000 1,075,000 - 0.0%<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 80,202,659 88,634,106 95,920,379 102,744,114 6,823,735 7.1%<br />
NET REVENUE OVER (UNDER) (4,778,602) 793,958 (559,441) (462,627) 96,814 -17.3%<br />
OTHER SOURCES<br />
Premium/Discount on Bonds - - - - -<br />
Prepaid Interest - - - - -<br />
Sale of Bonds - - - - -<br />
Other Uses 112,393 - - - -<br />
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 112,393 - - - - -<br />
NET REVENUE SOURCES OVER (UNDER) (4,666,209) 793,958 (559,441) (462,627) 96,814 -17.3%<br />
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 25,271,334 20,605,125 21,399,083 20,839,642 (559,441) -2.6%<br />
ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 20,605,125 $ 21,399,083 $ 20,839,642 $ 20,377,015 $ (462,627) -2.2%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Expenditures<br />
26% 24% 22% 20%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 59
Capital Projects Fund<br />
Appropriations for the Capital Projects Fund are not incorporated into the official <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>. The Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> is reviewed and approved by the Board of Trustees, while the funding for<br />
capital projects is approved by <strong>Austin</strong> voters. However, the capital projects have a significant dollar value<br />
and are an integral part of the district’s operations. Data on capital projects are being presented for<br />
informational purposes only.<br />
The Capital Projects Fund generally encompasses projects that are financed through the issuance of<br />
school building bonds, subject to approval by voters. Some examples of Capital Project Fund<br />
expenditures include:<br />
Purchase sites for school buildings<br />
Acquisition, construction, renovation, rehabilitation and improvement of school buildings<br />
Purchase of new school buses<br />
Equipping school buildings (furniture, fixtures, and equipment)<br />
The Apple at Work Bond Program<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> voters in September 2004 gave their overwhelming approval to a five-year, $519.5 million school<br />
bond program to alleviate overcrowding, keep up with <strong>Austin</strong>'s growth, and improve the quality, safety and<br />
sustainability of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>'s campuses and facilities. The vast majority of these capital projects have<br />
been completed.<br />
In May 2008, <strong>Austin</strong> voters approved a $343.7 million bond initiative for capital projects, which will be<br />
implemented over a four year period. This voter approval enables the district to increase the I&S tax rate<br />
to a maximum of $0.170 per $100 assessed value. The <strong>FY2013</strong> I&S tax rate is currently $0.163 per $100<br />
of assessed value.<br />
The district is contemplating the capital project needs for a new bond program, possibly in 2013.<br />
Table 36<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2008 Bond Initiative Capital Projects<br />
$82,000,000<br />
23.9%<br />
Special<br />
Programs and<br />
Expansion<br />
Health, Safety,<br />
Environment,<br />
Critical<br />
Renovations,<br />
and Other<br />
District Needs<br />
Relief for<br />
Overcrowding,<br />
Growth and<br />
Support for<br />
Academic<br />
Achievement<br />
$187,797,315<br />
54.6%<br />
$73,920,504<br />
21.5%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 60
Table 37<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Capital Projects<br />
Campus/Department<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Actual and<br />
Remaining<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
Akins High additions and renovations 430,843 2,785,554 1,078,859 92,132 102,596<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High additions and renovations 397,097 6,897,701 1,342,390 417,609 308,711<br />
New Baldwin Elementary 2,679,664 13,306,899 611,653 174,595 125,703<br />
Barrington Elementary additions and renovations 357,475 2,585,053 82,246 136,579 51,109<br />
Bedichek Middle additions and renovations 3,831,466 288,360 102,923 62,967 67,268<br />
Bowie High science classrooms and renovations 571,670 3,074,674 238,064 137,774 167,910<br />
Burnet Middle renovations and improvements 2,216,908 254,698 71,760 13,278 69,650<br />
Construction Management 22,107,604 36,363,704 17,862,064 18,325,980 16,049,675<br />
Crockett High science classrooms and renovations 200,881 1,783,944 398,741 126,369 166,956<br />
Doss Elementary renovations and improvements 1,597,644 202,407 287,321 115,980 116,092<br />
Eastside Memorial renovations and improvements 3,241,195 1,926,638 237,317 402,261 203,919<br />
New Gorzycki Middle School 23,375,165 1,014,909 210,818 65,504 8,329<br />
Graham Elementary additions and renovations - 12,384 - - 48,049<br />
Hart Elementary additions and renovations 346,137 2,195,364 314,213 32,813 50,417<br />
Information System Admin upgrades 10,605,207 6,785,094 23,878,135 9,862,871 1,836,412<br />
L C Anderson High additions and renovations 1,736,450 8,948,432 2,844,526 465,205 169,290<br />
Langford Elementary additions and renovations 721,161 2,768,911 129,975 133,628 58,010<br />
Lanier High additions and renovations 3,943,228 1,432,769 4,250,939 2,712,277 282,756<br />
New Uphaus Early Childhood Center 155,464 1,149,513 2,373,251 11,880,026 4,351,662<br />
McCallum High additions and renovations 778,526 4,936,654 8,190,791 95,041 99,606<br />
Network Support Group technology upgrades 3,136,024 976,479 2,744,373 48,733 1,510,104<br />
New Performing Arts Center 698,417 8,292 6,579 5,147,664 17,201,184<br />
New Bus Terminal 62,891 9,960 - 2,414,622 1,801,387<br />
New buses and equipment - - - 105 -<br />
New North Central Elementary - - - 1,486,071 14,695,581<br />
New South High School Land - - - - 20,000,000<br />
New Undesignated North Central Elementary #2 3,796,922 11,876,871<br />
Warehouse additions and renovations 4,975,183 5,798,621 4,853,796 3,140,360 48,049<br />
Webb Middle additions and renovations 4,338,214 512,845 304,190 1,253,476 848,855<br />
Wooldridge Elementary additions and renovations 2,615,793 524,237 7,557 13,852 51,579<br />
Grand Total $ 95,120,304 $ 106,544,096 $ 72,422,480 $ 62,554,694 $ 92,367,730<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 61
Grant Funds<br />
In addition to the previously discussed Governmental Funds, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> receives grant funds from a<br />
variety of sources. Grant funds have strict provisions and are generally restricted for a specific purpose.<br />
The district may not use these funds for anything other than what is listed in the Notice of Grant Award<br />
(NOGA). Grants have varying time spans. Some grants may be received on an annual basis, while other<br />
grants may be for multiple years for a specific project or program.<br />
Federal Grants<br />
Title I Grants are the largest source of grant funds for the district. Title I funding is intended to provide<br />
additional funding to schools with high numbers or percentages of children from low-income families. It is<br />
estimated A<strong>ISD</strong> will receive more than $31.5 million in Title I funds during the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year. Five<br />
high schools, 11 middle schools and 50 elementary schools in the district will receive Title I funding.<br />
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides funding to assist states and local<br />
educational agencies to educate students with disabilities. IDEA grants are the next largest source of<br />
grant funding for the district. It is estimated A<strong>ISD</strong> will be awarded approximately $18.1 million for <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
The district projects it will receive $4.5 million from the federally funded Title II, Teacher & Principal<br />
Training and Recruiting Grant; $3.72 million from the Title III, Part A English Language Acquisitions and<br />
Language Enhancement Grant; and $3.5 million from the Title IV, 21st Century Community Learning<br />
Centers Grant. The 21st Century Grant supports the creation of community learning centers to provide<br />
academic enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and lowperforming<br />
schools.<br />
It is estimated the district will receive $1.3 million from the Career and Technical Basic Grant, which is<br />
also federally funded. This grant provides funding for secondary and post-secondary career and technical<br />
education programs.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> received $13.8 million from the federal Edujobs Grant in FY2012. Unfortunately, this grant was<br />
meant to be a one-year infusion of revenue, and A<strong>ISD</strong> will not be granted any additional Edujobs Grant<br />
revenue in <strong>FY2013</strong>. The Edujobs Grant helped support full-day pre-kindergarten, provided an additional<br />
planning period at the secondary level and funded school librarian salaries. The loss of these funds will<br />
shift these expenditures to the General Fund.<br />
Sequestration and Federal Grant Funding<br />
On May 29, 2012, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) informed <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> of the possibility that all<br />
federal grants administered by the TEA may be reduced for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school and grant year by an<br />
amount ranging from 8 to 14 percent. However, on July 25, 2012, the TEA issued new guidance from the<br />
U.S. Department of Education. The process by which this reduction may take place, known as<br />
sequestration, is a provision of the <strong>Budget</strong> Control Act of 2011. If Congress fails to take action by January<br />
2, 2013, federal education spending will be cut for the FY2014 school and grant year. Instead of taking of<br />
sequestered funds from the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year appropriations as communicated on May 29, 2012, the<br />
funds will now be sequestered from the funds that will be available in July 2013 for the FY2014 school<br />
year.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 62
Table 38<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Grant Funding from Federal Sources<br />
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Grant<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
Revenues<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
$ Variance<br />
from FY2012<br />
to <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
from FY2012<br />
to <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
5900 Federal Sources<br />
Title I $ 23,704,800 $ 28,425,229 $ 30,971,538 $ 31,799,055 $ 827,517 3%<br />
IDEA Grant 16,190,755 12,572,034 15,149,310 19,499,577 4,350,267 35%<br />
Title II 4,002,130 3,951,933 3,237,133 3,130,006 (107,127) -3%<br />
Title III 3,103,982 2,078,002 2,671,603 2,321,953 (349,650) -17%<br />
Title IV 3,644,626 3,227,128 1,982,630 3,461,630 1,479,000 46%<br />
Career and Technical - Basic Grant 1,279,638 1,248,132 1,189,683 1,051,743 (137,940) -11%<br />
Total Federal Revenues<br />
$ 51,925,931 $ 51,502,458 $ 55,201,897 $ 61,263,964 $ 6,062,067 12%<br />
Expenditures<br />
By Function<br />
11 Instruction 29,451,153 30,624,428 33,612,298 34,703,005 1,090,707 4%<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Services 229,087 720,003 112,412 204,801 92,389 13%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development 4,845,749 5,404,606 7,267,785 9,801,868 2,534,083 47%<br />
21 Instructional Administration 3,257,340 1,986,780 2,358,625 2,040,461 (318,164) -16%<br />
23 School Administration 1,575,776 2,089,877 1,842,176 2,417,416 575,240 28%<br />
31 Guidance & Counseling Services 5,472,251 4,172,702 4,203,337 4,130,138 -73,199 -2%<br />
32 Attendance & Social Work Services 836,903 893,364 1,059,809 345,794 (714,015) -80%<br />
33 Health Services 232,943 148,569 155,549 88,360 (67,189) -45%<br />
34 Pupil Transportation 349,036 171,815 250,000 700,000 450,000 262%<br />
35 Food Services 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities 65,206 45,163 64,677 313,480 248,803 551%<br />
41 General Administration 221,108 241,651 288,963 285,599 (3,364) -1%<br />
51 Plant Maintenance 27,569 21,686 45,676 27,035 (18,641) -86%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services 28,198 3,298 6,200 13,610 7,410 225%<br />
53 Data Processing Services 643,932 721,534 571,664 942,998 371,334 51%<br />
61 Community Services 4,689,680 4,256,982 3,362,726 5,249,399 1,886,673 44%<br />
71 Debt Services 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
91 Contracted Instructional Srvcs-Public Schools 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
93 Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
Total Expenditures $ 51,925,931 $ 51,502,458 $ 55,201,897 $ 61,263,964 6,062,067 10%<br />
*Note: This table provides the Federal Grant information at the time of print. The district is awarded varying amounts each year and<br />
varies depending on the student population.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 63
Corporate and Philanthropic Partnership Support<br />
Despite the recent economic downturn, numerous corporate and philanthropic partners continue to help<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> achieve exemplary results with our students, parents and families. Partners help by providing direct<br />
financial support, by supporting community partners who work with students in our schools and by giving<br />
hundreds of volunteer hours directly to our schools and through our volunteer organization, <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Partners in Education.<br />
In A<strong>ISD</strong>, our strategic partners help teachers and schools address important issues that can impede<br />
student learning. Support from partners improves the overall climate in the school and district for learning<br />
and prepares all students to be ready for college, career and life.<br />
However, A<strong>ISD</strong> continues to anticipate an increasingly strained financial landscape in education, facing<br />
potentially unprecedented cuts in the next five years. We anticipate the need to secure $30 million in<br />
external private funding over the next three years to continue to provide new delivery models, improve the<br />
overall school and district climate for learning and develop academic achievement and support strategies<br />
for special populations through accelerated and differentiated instruction. Without the direct financial and<br />
volunteer support that partners provide, A<strong>ISD</strong> will not be able to continue to provide new delivery models,<br />
improve the overall school and district climate for learning and develop academic achievement and<br />
support strategies for special populations through accelerated and differentiated instruction. A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
appreciates those partners who have invested with a long-term view and welcome others who may want<br />
to join us in creating an exceptional educational experience.<br />
In FY2010, a Comprehensive Resource Development Needs Assessment, which surveyed 1,000 district<br />
staff and external partners, showed that the district is poised for a partnership and investment<br />
renaissance if it can leverage its relationship strengths, reduce confusion and duplication of effort and<br />
improve shared accountability.<br />
To meet this need, A<strong>ISD</strong> established the Office of Innovation and Development (IAD) to provide a<br />
centralized location for partner support for external resource development. IAD brings significant new<br />
external resources to the school district to support initiatives deemed crucial to the progress of the district,<br />
creating a coherent and strategic infrastructure to bring in the highest possible yield of both public and<br />
private funds to enable the district to carry out its Strategic Plan.<br />
IAD now provides resource development and management supports and services to district, campus and<br />
individual staff and external partners including:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Creating opportunities to share innovative program investments with external partners<br />
Identifying and sharing funding opportunities<br />
Facilitating and writing strategic funding proposals<br />
Providing technical assistance for grant writing and grant management, trainings, workshops and<br />
individual professional development opportunities, and access to online funding resources.<br />
The Office of Innovation and Development (IAD) has submitted more than $14.7 million in grants to date,<br />
and has been awarded approximately $6.9 million to date (many grants are still pending). IAD has also<br />
seen a 50 percent growth in partnerships over the past year.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 64
Partners<br />
Building strategic partnerships and creating district-wide priorities allows the district to provide new<br />
delivery models, duplicate best practices and accelerate effective programming. A<strong>ISD</strong>’s Office of<br />
Innovation and Development is proud to work with the following partners who are active participants in the<br />
district’s growth:<br />
3M Foundation<br />
Applied Materials<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Chamber of Commerce<br />
Buena Vista Foundation<br />
City of <strong>Austin</strong><br />
E3 Alliance<br />
Bill & Melinda<br />
Gates Foundation<br />
Google<br />
HEB<br />
IBM<br />
Intel<br />
KDK Harman Foundation<br />
Kennedy Center<br />
KLE Foundation<br />
Klein Family Foundation<br />
Matt Foundation<br />
Michael & Susan<br />
Dell Foundation (MSDF)<br />
Moody Foundation<br />
Mueller Foundation<br />
National Instruments<br />
NoVo Foundation<br />
RGK Foundation<br />
Seedling Foundation<br />
Seton Family of Hospitals<br />
Skillpoint Alliance<br />
Sooch Foundation<br />
St. David’s Foundation<br />
Tapestry Foundation<br />
Target<br />
Teacher Heaven<br />
Time Warner Cable<br />
United Way–Capital Area<br />
Univision<br />
Wells Fargo<br />
Whole Foods<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 65
Enrollment Growth<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>’s total enrollment continues to grow each year with the number of economically disadvantaged<br />
and English language learner students growing notably, from 49 percent to 64 percent, and 13 percent to<br />
29 percent, respectively, from FY1998 to FY2011. These changing demographic trends, as well as<br />
others, will continue to impact the district for many years. Planning for this growth adds complexity to the<br />
district’s planning process. For example, there are fewer families with children in the central urban core of<br />
the city, yet there has been continued growth in the far southern portion of the district. Additional<br />
examples include:<br />
<br />
<br />
With approximately 87,000 students, A<strong>ISD</strong> is expected to grow by approximately 612 students<br />
from FY2012 to <strong>FY2013</strong>. In contrast of the previous year, it is projected there will be an increase<br />
in high school (+735). It is projected there will be a decrease in primary grades (-105) and in<br />
middle school grades (-18). The special campus enrollment is projected to be the same as in the<br />
prior year.<br />
Increasing births over the last 10 years point to continued elementary growth.<br />
Increasingly large kindergarten classes over the last six years (growing from 7,313 to 7,819)<br />
points to continued elementary growth.<br />
94,000<br />
92,000<br />
90,000<br />
88,000<br />
86,000<br />
84,000<br />
82,000<br />
80,000<br />
78,000<br />
76,000<br />
78,759<br />
78,408<br />
79,896<br />
Table 39<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Enrollment History and Projections<br />
81,295<br />
82,063<br />
82,739<br />
83,033<br />
88,978<br />
86,724 87,336<br />
85,273<br />
84,245<br />
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Est<br />
FY2014<br />
Est<br />
90,186<br />
FY2015<br />
Est<br />
91,777<br />
FY2016<br />
Est<br />
93,140<br />
FY2017<br />
Est<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 66
Staffing<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> staffing formulas/guidelines were amended in FY2012 to help close the district’s projected<br />
FY2012 and <strong>FY2013</strong> budget shortfalls. Personnel costs comprise almost 87 percent of the district’s<br />
operating expenditure budget. Staffing formulas create the foundation on which school budgets are built.<br />
Table 40<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Five-Year Staffing History<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual % Actual % Actual % <strong>Budget</strong>ed % <strong>Budget</strong>ed %<br />
Teachers<br />
(Includes regular elementary,<br />
secondary, and special program<br />
teachers)<br />
Campus Administration<br />
(Includes principals, assistant<br />
principals, and academy directors)<br />
Central Administration<br />
(Includes superintendent, chiefs,<br />
associate/assistant superintendents,<br />
executive directors, and directors)<br />
5,889 52.0% 5,976 51.6% 6,104 52.2% 5,714 51.2% 5,974 52.0%<br />
424 3.7% 449 3.9% 458 3.9% 449 4.0% 456 4.0%<br />
73 0.6% 76 0.7% 76 0.6% 75 0.7% 75 0.7%<br />
Professional Support<br />
(Includes counselors, librarians,<br />
instructional/curriculum specialists,<br />
therapists, assistant directors,<br />
supervisors, coordinators, athletic<br />
trainers, etc.)<br />
Auxiliary Staff<br />
(Includes non classroom<br />
paraprofessional, bus drivers, hourly<br />
employees, and other)<br />
963 8.5% 978 8.5% 970 8.3% 965 8.7% 951 8.3%<br />
3,137 27.7% 3,226 27.9% 3,230 27.6% 3,101 27.8% 3,146 27.4%<br />
Educational Aides<br />
(Includes regular and special<br />
programs paraprofessionals working<br />
in classrooms to assist teachers)<br />
837 7.4% 866 7.5% 856 7.3% 847 7.6% 886 7.7%<br />
Total 11,322 11,571 11,694 11,151 11,488<br />
Student Enrollment 83,033 84,245 85,273 86,724 87,336<br />
Staffing Ratios<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.10 14.10 13.97 15.18 14.62<br />
Student/Total Staff Ratio 7.33 7.28 7.29 7.78 7.60<br />
Note: Information in the FY2009 through FY2011 columns is actual data from the AEIS (Academic Excellence<br />
Indicator System) of TEA, whereas information in FY2012 and <strong>FY2013</strong> columns are budgeted numbers.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 67
Salaries & Benefits<br />
The largest single component of a school district’s operating budget is salary and benefit expenditures.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong>’s payroll expenditures consume nearly 87 percent of the General Fund budget for <strong>FY2013</strong> when<br />
Chapter 41 is excluded. As part of a multi-year strategy, the district adjusted the staffing<br />
formulas/guidelines, declared financial exigency and enacted a reduction in force in FY2012 in an effort to<br />
reduce the largest budgeted expenditure.<br />
Table 41<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Comparison Excluding Chapter 41 by Percent (General Fund)<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund excluding Chapter 41<br />
Salaries<br />
86.61%<br />
Capital<br />
Outlay<br />
0.02%<br />
Debt Service<br />
0.12%<br />
Other Operating<br />
Expenses<br />
0.93%<br />
Supplies &<br />
Materials<br />
3.79%<br />
Contracted<br />
Services<br />
8.53%<br />
Future Year <strong>Budget</strong> Projections<br />
Uncertainty for the 2013 Legislative Session<br />
The next few budget cycles may prove challenging for A<strong>ISD</strong>. The 83rd Texas Legislature will convene in<br />
2013, and with that comes increased work for district staff and increased uncertainty about the district’s<br />
financial standing. Legislators addressed state budget shortfalls during the 2011 session by applying<br />
funding cuts to school districts. High- target-revenue districts, like A<strong>ISD</strong>, faced a much larger share of the<br />
funding reductions, while some districts received small funding cuts or none at all. It is projected state aid<br />
will decrease $59.1 million for <strong>FY2013</strong> from HB3646 funding levels to SB1 funding levels.<br />
Additionally, the legislature adopted a goal of working toward complete elimination of State Aid for Tax<br />
Reduction (also referred to as target revenue) by FY2018. Complete elimination of this funding source for<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> would constitute a loss of about $150 million. Unless wholesale changes are made to the school<br />
finance system, A<strong>ISD</strong> can expect significant cuts in the coming years.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 68
Local Economic Recovery<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> is often publicized as one of the<br />
premier cities leading the national economic<br />
recovery. <strong>Austin</strong> is one of the top-performing<br />
metro areas in business-cycle performance,<br />
employment rates and construction permits.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> has experienced 2.5 percent<br />
employment growth from February 2011 to<br />
February 2012 compared to 2.0 percent<br />
growth in Texas, and 1.9 percent growth in<br />
the United States during the same period.<br />
The population of <strong>Austin</strong> is growing and that<br />
trend is expected to continue. National news<br />
reports suggest several factors account for<br />
the emergence of <strong>Austin</strong> and Texas as<br />
recovery leaders, among them:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Austin</strong>’s position as a capital city and<br />
center for higher learning. The University<br />
of Texas at <strong>Austin</strong> and state government<br />
provide greater economic stability than in<br />
other places.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong>’s role as the leading technology<br />
center outside of California.<br />
Texas’ largely recession-proof energy industry.<br />
Texas didn’t see the same spikes in home prices or unchecked real estate speculation that led to a<br />
decrease in housing prices elsewhere.<br />
Texas’ increasing role as a global economic powerhouse.<br />
The Texas economy also continues to improve. Several of the economic indicators continue to suggest<br />
that Texas is on a stable path and will continue to recover over the next few years.<br />
While there has been improvement, we need to maintain realistic expectations. The Travis County Chief<br />
Tax Appraiser expects property values to stabilize in 2012 with moderate growth in 2013. If state aid<br />
continues to decline, inflation creates baseline expenditure (fuel, utilities, materials, etc.) increases and<br />
student enrollment continues to increase, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will not be able to maintain current expenditure<br />
levels in the future.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 69
Table 42<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Future <strong>Budget</strong> Projections for General Fund<br />
FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014 FY2015<br />
Actual Adopted Adopted Projected Projected<br />
Revenues $ 858,223,179 $ 837,872,757 $ 808,014,468 $ 833,501,377 $ 849,083,011<br />
Expenditures (811,699,171) (838,500,731) (835,961,379) (866,531,707) (885,319,655)<br />
Net 46,524,008 (627,974) (27,946,911) (33,030,330) (36,236,644)<br />
Other Sources 80,025 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000<br />
Other Uses (73,387) (81,000) (81,000) (81,000) (81,000)<br />
Net Other Sources (Uses) 6,638 (30,000) (30,000) (30,000) (30,000)<br />
Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 46,530,646 (657,974) (27,976,911) (33,060,330) (36,266,644)<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase orders<br />
and unspent balances at year end 30,064,925<br />
Beginning Fund Balance (Estimated) 172,135,096 218,665,742 248,072,693 220,095,782 187,035,452<br />
Ending Fund Balance (Estimated) 218,665,742 248,072,693 220,095,782 187,035,452 150,768,808<br />
Less Assigned Balance (39,038,247) (48,983,942) (35,530,274) (35,000,000) (35,000,000)<br />
Ending Funding Balance - Unassigned $ 179,627,495 $ 199,088,751 $ 184,565,508 $ 152,035,452 $ 115,768,808<br />
22% 24% 22% 18% 13%<br />
Assumptions:<br />
1. The Foundation School Program (FSP) entitles A<strong>ISD</strong> and all school districts in Texas to provide<br />
basic education for each student. The 82 nd Texas Legislature applied funding cuts in SB1 to<br />
address state budget shortfalls; subsequently, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> lost a total of $96.6 million this fiscal<br />
biennium. It is anticipated that the 2013 legislative session will enact more changes in state<br />
funding formulas, which may impact the district’s FSP for the next biennium, FY2014 and<br />
FY2015. But, it is difficult to speculate future state cuts and apply in forecast models.<br />
2. The district shall maintain an unassigned fund balance sufficiently adequate for fiscal cash<br />
liquidity purposes (i.e., fiscal reserve) to provide for sufficient cash flow to minimize the potential<br />
of short-term tax anticipation borrowing. This amount shall be equal to but not less than 14<br />
percent of the combined budgeted expenditures of the district General Fund.<br />
3. The <strong>FY2013</strong> and future year M&O tax rate projections are based on the current adopted rate of<br />
$1.079 per $100 of assessed taxable value. If voters approved an increase to the M&O tax rate in<br />
a tax ratification election, projected revenues for future years would increase.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 70
Summary<br />
While the district has had to make some difficult budgetary decisions to manage during this tough fiscal<br />
climate, it is in no way free from the financial turbulence that is affecting us all. The need to stay<br />
competitive with surrounding school districts by maintaining and expanding its highly qualified workforce<br />
will require the district to implement a multi-year compensation strategy that necessitates additional<br />
revenue. In addition, further state cuts in education funding could be forthcoming. And while the district is<br />
has been able to stabilize the budget, new revenue will be needed to address these issues.<br />
Because A<strong>ISD</strong> is a Chapter 41 district, the only ways to substantially increase revenue is to increase the<br />
number of students and their attendance rates, and to increase the property tax rate. The district only<br />
nominally benefits from rising appraisal values due to this funding formula structure. So in order to do<br />
both, the district will need to continually educate and engage the public if it is going to be successful when<br />
it asks voters to approve a rate increase through a tax ratification election.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> will continue to work with our partners to secure additional funding for Strategic Plan priorities. The<br />
district will continue to efficiently align our resources, financial and non-financial with our Strategic Plan –<br />
the Power of Us, ensuring every child in every school is on track to graduate, ready for college, career<br />
and life in a globally competitive economy.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 71
This Page Intentionally Left Blank<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 72
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
Organization
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
School Districts in the Surrounding Area<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> is located within the Travis County of Texas. Travis County comprises seven school districts<br />
including <strong>Austin</strong>, Del Valle, Eanes, Lago Vista, Lake Travis, Manor and Pflugerville; <strong>Austin</strong> School District<br />
is the largest one with a student population of approximately 87,000. Statewide, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> is the fifth<br />
largest school district in Texas.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> has 119 regular campuses composed of 17 high schools, 18 middle schools and 84<br />
elementary schools. The district has 10 special campuses, for a total of 129 campuses. The district<br />
provides a comprehensive range of educational opportunities appropriate for grade levels prekindergarten<br />
through twelve. These include basic and enriched academic programs such as magnet<br />
schools, special education, compensatory education, vocational education, English as a Second<br />
Language, a dual language program, two science/environmental learning centers, three agricultural farms<br />
and adult education.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 73
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> - District Boundaries<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 74
Overview of <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> is one of the fastest-growing cities in the state and in the nation. <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> is the fifth largest<br />
school district in Texas and the 37th largest district in the United States. It serves the City of <strong>Austin</strong>,<br />
Texas, which has a population of approximately 790,390 according to the latest decennial 2010 U.S.<br />
Census Bureau statistics. The Census Bureau estimates the <strong>Austin</strong> Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)<br />
has a population of 1,716,289 and projects this number to increase by 33.9 percent to 2,292,737 by 2020.<br />
There are approximately 87,000 students enrolled in <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and the students are reflective of the<br />
diverse population. The boundaries of A<strong>ISD</strong> include most of the City of <strong>Austin</strong> and much of Travis County.<br />
Of the 29 public school districts in the MSA, A<strong>ISD</strong> is the largest, followed by Round Rock, Leander,<br />
Pflugerville, Hays, Georgetown, Bastrop, Del Valle, San Marcos, and Eanes. A<strong>ISD</strong> is one of the largest<br />
employers in the area. Other large employers include the State of Texas, the University of Texas at<br />
<strong>Austin</strong>, Dell, the City of <strong>Austin</strong>, the Federal government, the Seton Family of Hospitals, St. David’s<br />
Healthcare partnership, IBM Corporation and Freescale Semiconductor.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> built its first publicly funded school in 1876, but the majority of <strong>Austin</strong>ites remained indifferent<br />
toward public education. The city’s numerous private schools continued to dominate the educational<br />
landscape for nearly fifty years.<br />
Enrollment continues to increase at <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>. For the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year, enrollment is projected to be<br />
87,336, an increase of 612 students over the prior year. The demographic analysis and enrollment<br />
projections indicate in the years ahead, an increase of approximately 25,000 students is possible.<br />
Elementary schools could increase by 13,000, middle schools by 5,000, and high schools by 7,000.<br />
Table 43<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Enrollment History<br />
Level FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
High 19,986 20,084 19,878 20,536 21,271<br />
Middle 15,432 15,582 15,557 16,312 16,294<br />
Elementary 46,787 47,821 49,297 49,374 49,269<br />
Special Campus 828 758 541 502 502<br />
Total 83,033 84,245 85,273 86,724 87,336<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 75
Table 44<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Ethnicity Percentages<br />
Ethnicity FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
African American 11.7% 11.3% 9.5% 9.1%<br />
Asian/Pacific Islanders 3.4% 3.7% 3.3% 3.3%<br />
Hispanic 58.8% 58.9% 60.3% 60.5%<br />
Native American 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%<br />
White 25.8% 25.8% 24.3% 24.4%<br />
Other 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 2.4%<br />
The changing demographics<br />
of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> are reflected in<br />
the table above. Historical<br />
data over the last five years<br />
indicate the White and African<br />
American student groups were<br />
shrinking, the Hispanic student<br />
groups were growing, and the<br />
Asian/Pacific Islander and<br />
Native American student<br />
group populations remained<br />
relatively flat.<br />
Hispanic<br />
60.5%<br />
Asian/Pacific<br />
Islanders<br />
3.3%<br />
African<br />
American<br />
9.1%<br />
White<br />
24.4%<br />
Other<br />
2.4%<br />
Native<br />
American<br />
0.3%<br />
Campus Listing<br />
High Schools Address Phone No.<br />
Akins High School 10701 South 1st Street, <strong>Austin</strong> TX 78748 512-841-9925<br />
Anderson High School 8403 Mesa Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78759 512-414-2538<br />
Anne Richards SYWL 2206 Prather Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3236<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High School 1715 W. Cesar Chavez, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78703 512-414-7200<br />
Bowie High School 4103 Slaughter Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-414-7301<br />
Crockett High School 5601 Manchaca Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-841-7806<br />
Eastside Memorial High School 1012 Arthur Stiles, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78721 512-414-2303<br />
International High School 1012 Arthur Stiles, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78721 512-414-0791<br />
Lanier High School 1201 Peyton Gin Road W. <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78758 512-414-7452<br />
LASA - Liberal Arts & Science Academy 7309 Lazy Creek Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78724 512-414-7095<br />
LBJ Comprehensive HS 7309 Lazy Creek Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78724 512-414-4051<br />
McCallum High School 5600 Sunshine Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78756 512-414-7501<br />
Premier High School at Lanier In-district<br />
Charter School 1201 Peyton Gin Road W. <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78758 512-886-6878<br />
Premier High School at Travis In-district<br />
Charter School 1211 E. Oltorf, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-809-2819<br />
Reagan High School 7104 Berkman Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78752 512-414-6570<br />
Travis High School 1211 E. Oltorf, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-7789<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 76
Campus Listing (continued)<br />
Middle Schools Address Phone No.<br />
Bailey Middle School 4020 Lost Oasis Hollow, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78739 512-414-5410<br />
Bedichek Middle School 6800 Bill Hughes Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5180<br />
Burnet Middle School 8401 Hathaway, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78757 512-414-4200<br />
Covington Middle School 3700 Convict Hill Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-414-5370<br />
Dobie Middle School (PK-8) 1200 E. Rundberg Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78753 512-414-4360<br />
Fulmore Middle School 201 East Mary, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3430<br />
Garcia Middle School 7414 Johnny Morris Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78724 512-841-9405<br />
Gorzycki Middle School 7412 Slaughter Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-841-8600<br />
IDEA Allan In-District Charter School 4900 Gonzales, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-6120<br />
Kealing Middle School 1607 Pennsylvania Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-2410<br />
Lamar Middle School 6201 Wynona, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78757 512-414-4507<br />
Martin Middle School 1601 Haskell, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3100<br />
Mendez Middle School 5106 Village Square, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-414-3510<br />
Murchsion Middle School 3700 North Hills Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78731 512-414-4516<br />
O. Henry Middle School 2610 West 10th Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78703 512-414-7100<br />
Paredes Middle School 1100 S. Mary Moore Searight Dr, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78748 512-841-6825<br />
Pearce Middle School 6401 N. Hampton Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-414-5002<br />
Small Middle School 4801 Monterey Oaks Blvd., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-841-6705<br />
Webb Middle School (PK-8) 601 E. Street Johns, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78752 512-414-4170<br />
Elementary Schools Address Phone No.<br />
Allan Elementary (Pre-K Program) 4900 Gonzales, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3130<br />
Allison Elementary 515 Vargas Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78741 512-414-1058<br />
Andrews Elementary 6801 Northeast Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-414-5657<br />
Baldwin Elementary 12200 Meridian Park Blvd. <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78739 512-841-8900<br />
Baranoff Elementary 12009 Buckingham Gate Rd, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-841-7105<br />
Barrington Elementary 400 Cooper Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78753 512-414-4601<br />
Barton Hills Elementary 2108 Barton Hills Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3330<br />
Becker Elementary 906 W. Milton., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3460<br />
Blackshear Elementary 1712 East 11th Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-2760<br />
Blanton Elementary 5408 Westminster Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-414-4615<br />
Blazier Elementary 8601 Nuckols Crossing, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-841-8800<br />
Boone Elementary 8101 Croftwood Drive., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-414-5311<br />
Brentwood Elementary 6700 Arroyo Seco., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78757 512-414-4330<br />
Brooke Elementary 3100 East 4th Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3106<br />
Brown Elementary 505 W. Anderson., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78752 512-414-4280<br />
Bryker Woods Elementary 3309 Kerbey Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78703 512-414-7159<br />
Campbell Elementary 2613 Rogers Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78722 512-414-2775<br />
Casey Elementary 9400 Texas Oaks Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78748 512-841-6911<br />
Casis Elementary 2710 Exposition Blvd., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78703 512-414-7160<br />
Clayton Elementary 7525 La Crosse Ave, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78739 512-841-9205<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 77
Campus Listing (continued)<br />
Elementary Schools Address Phone No.<br />
Cook Elementary 1511 Cripple Creek., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78758 512-414-2506<br />
Cowan Elementary 2817 Kentish Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78748 512-841-2750<br />
Cunningham Elementary 2200 Berkely Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5130<br />
Davis Elementary 5214 Duval Road., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78727 512-414-4134<br />
Dawson Elementary 3001 South 1st Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3380<br />
Doss Elementary 7005 Northledge, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78731 512-414-4150<br />
Galindo Elementary 3800 S. 2nd, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-1759<br />
Govalle Elementary 3601 Govalle Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3750<br />
Graham Elementary 11211 Tom Adams Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78753 512-414-4071<br />
Gullett Elementary 6310 Treadwell Blvd., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78757 512-414-2740<br />
Harris Elementary 1711 Wheeless Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-414-4644<br />
Hart Elementary 8301 Furness Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78753 512-841-2101<br />
Highland Park Elementary 4900 Fairview, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78731 512-414-1300<br />
Hill Elementary 8601 Tallwood Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78759 512-414-4270<br />
Houston Elementary 5409 Ponciana Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-414-3560<br />
IDEA Allan In-District Charter School 4900 Gonzales, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-2304<br />
Jordan Elementary 6711 Johnny Morris Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78724 512-414-2583<br />
Joslin Elementary 4500 Manchaca Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5230<br />
Kiker Elementary 5913 La Crosse Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78739 512-414-5350<br />
Kocurek Elementary 9800 Curlew Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78748 512-414-5290<br />
Langford Elementary 2206 Blue Meadow, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-414-2064<br />
Lee Elementary 3308 Hampton Road. <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78705 512-414-1117<br />
Linder Elementary 2800 Metcalf Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78741 512-414-3720<br />
Maplewood Elementary 3808 Maplewood Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78722 512-414-1090<br />
Mathews Elementary 906 West Lynn, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78703 512-414-7150<br />
McBee Elementary 1001 West Braker Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78758 512-841-2549<br />
Menchaca Elementary 12120 Manchaca Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78748 512-414-5330<br />
Metz Elementary 84 Robert T. Martinez, Jr., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3090<br />
Mills Elementary 6200 Davis Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-841-2406<br />
Norman Elementary 4001 Tannehill Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78721 512-414-3160<br />
Oak Hill Elementary 6101 Patton Ranch Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78735 512-414-5140<br />
Oak Springs Elementary 3601 Webberville Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-1099<br />
Odom Elementary 1010 Turtle Creek Blvd., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5280<br />
Ortega Elementary 1135 Garland Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78721 512-414-3140<br />
Overton Elementary 7201 Colony Loop Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78724 512-841-9305<br />
Palm Elementary 7601 Dixie Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-414-3407<br />
Patton Elementary 6001 Westcreek Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78749 512-414-1705<br />
Pease Elementary 1106 Rio Grande, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78701 512-414-2015<br />
Pecan Springs Elementary 3100 Rogge Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-414- 4020<br />
Perez Elementary 7500 S. Pleasant Valley Rd, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-841-9105<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 78
Campus Listing (continued)<br />
Elementary Schools Address Phone No.<br />
Pickle Elementary 1101 Wheatley Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78752 512-841-8401<br />
Pillow Elementary 3025 Crosscreek Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78758 512-414-4307<br />
Pleasant Hill Elementary 6405 Circle S Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5170<br />
Read Pre-K 2608 Rich Creek, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78757 512-414-4721<br />
Reilly Elementary 405 Denson Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78752 512-414-4120<br />
Ridgetop Elementary 5005 Caswell Ave., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78751 512-414-2000<br />
Rodriguez Elementary 4400 Franklin Park Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-841-7272<br />
Sanchez Elementary 73 San Marcos, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3040<br />
Sims Elementary 1203 Springdale Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78721 512-414-3170<br />
St. Elmo Elementary 600 W. Street Elmo Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5260<br />
Summitt Elementary 12207 Brigadoon Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78727 512-414-4245<br />
Sunset Valley Elementary 3000 Jones Road, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78745 512-414-5100<br />
Travis Heights Elementary 2010 Alameda Drive, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3480<br />
Uphaus Early Childhood Center 5200 Freidrich Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-414-5521<br />
Walnut Creek Elementary 4010 W. Braker Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78753 512-414-3930<br />
Webb Primary Center 601 E. Street Johns, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78752 512-414-4170<br />
Widen Elementary 5606 Nuckols Crossing, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78744 512-414-3607<br />
Williams Elementary 500 Mairo, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78748 512-414-5245<br />
Winn Elementary 3500 Susquehanna Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78723 512-414-3950<br />
Wooldridge Elementary 1412 Norseman Ter., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78758 512-414-4040<br />
Wooten Elementary 1406 Dale, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78757 512-414-4100<br />
Zavala Elementary 310 Robert Martinez Jr., <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3025<br />
Zilker Elementary 1900 Blue Bonnett Lane, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3320<br />
Special Campuses Address Phone No.<br />
Elementary Disciplinary Alternative Education<br />
Program (DAEP)<br />
906 West Milton Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704<br />
512-414-2074<br />
ALC - Alternative Learning Center 901 Neal, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-3610<br />
Leadership Academy 2515 S. Congress, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3610<br />
Phoenix Academy 400 W. Live Oak, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3610<br />
Travis County Day School 8011 B Cameron Rd, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78754 512-414-3610<br />
Travis County Juvenile 2515 S. Congress, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78704 512-414-3610<br />
Dentention Center<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> State Hospital 5110 Guadalupe, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78751 512-414-4061<br />
Garza Independence High School 1600 Chicon, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78702 512-414-8616<br />
Rosedale School 2117 West 49th Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78756 512-414-3617<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 79
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Calendar for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 80
Organizational Structure<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is an independent, public educational agency operating under the applicable laws and regulations in<br />
the State of Texas. The district’s organizational hierarchy begins with the students, parents and<br />
community members who elect a nine-member Board of Trustees to autonomously govern the district.<br />
The Board of Trustees employs the superintendent, who is the Chief Executive Officer, to manage the<br />
day-to-day operations of the district. Under the superintendent are seven chiefs, who oversee various<br />
areas of the district’s operations, including academics, campus operations, human resources, facilities<br />
and system management, finance, performance evaluation and accountability. The Texas Education<br />
Agency provides the district’s education accreditation.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Board of Trustees<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees<br />
(from left) Robert Schneider, District 7; Tamala Barksdale, At Large 9; Lori Moya, SECRETARY, District 6;<br />
Cheryl Bradley, District 1; Mark Williams, PRESIDENT, District 5; Vincent M. Torres, VICE PRESIDENT, District 4;<br />
Christine Brister, District 3; Annette LoVoi, At Large 8; Sam Guzmán, District 2.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 81
A<strong>ISD</strong> Organizational Chart<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 82
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September 2012 83
Fund Structure Diagram<br />
All Funds<br />
Governmental Fund Types<br />
Propriety Fund Types<br />
Fiduciary Fund Types<br />
Internal Service Funds<br />
Agency Funds<br />
General Fund Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund<br />
OFFICIALLY ADOPTED FUNDS (See Note 1)<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
General Fund Food Service Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund<br />
Note 1: The audited financial statements of the School District include all funds as shown in the “All Funds”<br />
structure Diagram above. However, the Texas Education Agency requires only the adoption of the General Fund,<br />
Food Service Special Revenue Funds, and Debt Service Fund in August.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 84
Financial Structure and Basis for Accounting<br />
Governmental financial operations are regulated by various kinds of legal provisions. Other types of<br />
financial matters often are also regulated by charters, ordinances, resolutions, governing body orders,<br />
and intergovernmental grant or contract regulations.<br />
The annual operating budget is one of the most important of all legal documents governing financial<br />
transactions. Upon Board of Trustee approval, the expenditure requests in the budget become binding<br />
appropriations that may not legally be exceeded by the school district without an amendment. Taxes and<br />
other revenue sources that finance budgeted expenditures usually require Board enactment.<br />
An important function of governmental accounting systems is to enable administrators to assure and<br />
report on compliance with finance-related legal provisions. This assurance and reporting means that the<br />
accounting system, its terminology, fund structure and procedures must be adapted to satisfy finance<br />
related legal requirements. However, the basic financial statements of school districts should be prepared<br />
in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) established by the Governmental<br />
Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).<br />
Summary Statement of Principles of Accounting and Reporting<br />
`<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Accounting and Reporting Capabilities – The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> accounting system is maintained in<br />
accordance with GAAP. All funds and activities are presented fairly and are fully disclosed. The<br />
district maintains its accounting system in compliance with legal and contractual provisions.<br />
Fund Accounting System – The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> accounting system is organized and operated on a<br />
fund basis. A fund is defined as a fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of<br />
accounts recording cash and other financial resources, together with all related liabilities and<br />
residual equities or balances, and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of<br />
carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special<br />
regulations, restrictions or limitations. Fund financial statements are used to report detailed<br />
information about the primary government.<br />
Number of Funds – <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> maintains the number of funds necessary to carry on its functions<br />
required by law and contract. Funds comply with the properly defined code structures as<br />
established by the Texas Education Agency<br />
Types of Funds – The following types of funds are used by state and local governments, including<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>:<br />
o<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
• General Fund – to account for all financial resources except those required to be<br />
accounted for in another fund.<br />
• Special Revenue Funds – to account for proceeds of specific revenue sources<br />
(other than trust for individuals, private organizations, or other governments or for<br />
major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific<br />
purposes. The Food Services Fund is classified as a Special Revenue Fund.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 85
• Debt Service Funds – to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the<br />
payment of, general long-term debt principal and interest. Debt Service Funds<br />
are required if they are legally mandated and/or if financial resources are being<br />
accumulated for principal and interest payments maturing in future years.<br />
• Capital Projects Funds – to account for financial resources to be used for<br />
acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by<br />
Proprietary Funds or in Trust Funds for individuals, private organizations, or other<br />
governments). Capital outlay financed from general obligation bond proceeds<br />
should be accounted for through a Capital Projects Fund.<br />
o<br />
Proprietary Funds<br />
• Enterprise Funds – to report any activity for which a fee is charged to external<br />
users for goods or services. Activities are required to be reported as Enterprise<br />
Funds if any one of the following criteria is met.<br />
a.)<br />
b.)<br />
c.)<br />
The activity is financed with debt that is secured solely by a pledge of<br />
the net revenues from fees and charges of the activity. Debt that is<br />
secured by a pledge of net revenues from fees and charges and the<br />
full faith and credit of a related primary government or component unit<br />
– even if that government is not expected to make any payments – is<br />
not payable solely from fees and charges of the activity.<br />
Laws or regulations require that the activity’s costs of providing<br />
services, including capital costs be recovered with fees and charges,<br />
rather than with taxes or similar revenues.<br />
The pricing policies of the activity establish fees and charges<br />
designed to recover its costs, including capital costs (such as<br />
depreciation or debt service).<br />
• Internal Service Funds – to report any activity that provides goods or services to<br />
other funds, departments or agencies of the primary government and its<br />
component units, or to other governments, on a cost-reimbursement basis.<br />
Internal Service Funds should be used only if the reporting government is the<br />
predominant participant in the activity. Otherwise, the activity should be reported<br />
as an Enterprise Fund.<br />
o<br />
Fiduciary Funds - To account for assets held by the district in a trustee capacity or as an<br />
agent for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units and/or other funds.<br />
Trust and Agency Funds therefore cannot be used to support the district’s own programs.<br />
<br />
Reporting Capital Assets - A clear distinction has been made between general capital assets and<br />
capital assets of Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds. Capital assets of Proprietary Funds are<br />
reported in both the government-wide and fund financial statements. Capital assets of Fiduciary<br />
Funds are reported only in the statement of fiduciary net assets. All other capital assets of the<br />
governmental unit are general capital assets. They are not reported as assets in Governmental<br />
Funds but reported in the governmental activities column in the government-wide statement of<br />
net assets.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 86
Depreciation of Capital Assets – Capital assets are depreciated over their estimated useful life<br />
unless they are either inexhaustible or are infrastructure assets using the modified approach.<br />
Inexhaustible assets such as land and land improvements are not depreciated. Depreciation<br />
expenses are reported in the government-wide statement of activities; the Proprietary Fund<br />
statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund net assets; and the statement of<br />
changes in fiduciary new assets.<br />
Buildings and furniture and equipment of the district are depreciated using the straightline<br />
method over the following estimated useful lives:<br />
Items<br />
Years<br />
Building and site improvements 30<br />
Furniture and equipment 5-10<br />
Vehicles 5-7<br />
Property under capital leases 10<br />
Buses 8-10<br />
Computer software and equipment 3-7<br />
Portable buildings 10<br />
<br />
Valuation of Capital Assets – Capital assets are reported at historical cost. The cost of a capital<br />
asset includes ancillary charges necessary to place the asset into its intended location and<br />
condition for use. Donated capital assets are recorded at their estimated fair value at the time of<br />
acquisition plus ancillary changes, if any.<br />
<br />
Reporting Long-Term Liabilities – A clear distinction is made between fund long-term liabilities<br />
and general long-term liabilities. Long-term liabilities directly related to and expected to be paid<br />
from Proprietary Funds are reported in the Proprietary Fund statement of net assets and in the<br />
government-wide statement of net assets. Long-term liabilities directly related to and expected to<br />
be paid from Fiduciary Funds are reported in the statement of fiduciary net assets. All other unmatured<br />
general long-term liabilities of the governmental entity are not reported in the<br />
Governmental Funds but reported in the governmental activities column in the government-wide<br />
statement of net assets.<br />
<br />
Accrual Basis in Governmental Accounting – The modified accrual basis of accounting or accrual<br />
basis of accounting, as appropriate, is utilized in measuring financial position and operating<br />
results.<br />
o<br />
Governmental Fund revenues and expenditures are recognized on the modified accrual<br />
basis. Revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become available<br />
and measurable. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the fund<br />
liability is incurred, if measurable, except of un-matured interest on general long-term<br />
debt, which is recognized when due.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 87
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Fiduciary Funds are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the<br />
accrual basis of accounting, except for recognition of certain liabilities of defined benefit<br />
pension plans and certain post employment healthcare plans.<br />
Proprietary Fund statements include net assets, revenues, expenses and changes in<br />
fund net assets and are recognized on the accrual basis. Revenues are recognized in the<br />
accounting period in which they are earned and become measurable; expenses are<br />
recognized in the period incurred, if measurable.<br />
Transfer should be recognized in the accounting period in which the inter-fund receivable<br />
and payable arise.<br />
Fiscal Year – The district’s fiscal year begins September 1 and ends August 31.<br />
<br />
Common Terminology and Classification - A common terminology and classification is used<br />
consistently throughout the budget, the accounts and the financial reports of each fund or activity.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary Control and <strong>Budget</strong>ary Reporting –<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
An annual budget is adopted by <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees.<br />
The accounting system proves the basis for appropriate budgetary control.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary comparison schedules are presented as required supplementary information<br />
for the General Fund and for each major Special Revenue Fund that has a legally<br />
adopted annual budget. The budgetary comparison schedule presents both (a) the<br />
original and (b) the final appropriated budgets for the reporting period as well as (c)<br />
actual inflows, outflows, and balances, stated on the government’s budgetary basis.<br />
<br />
Transfer, Revenue, Expenditure, and Expense Account Classification – Transfers are classified<br />
separately from revenues and expenditures or expenses in the basic financial statements.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
The statement of activities presents the district’s activities at least at the level of detail<br />
required in the Governmental Fund statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in<br />
fund balances-at a minimum by function. The district presents business-type activities at<br />
least by different identifiable activities.<br />
Governmental Fund revenues are classified by fund and source. Expenditures are<br />
classified by fund and source. Expenditures are classified by fund, function (or program),<br />
organization unit, activity, character, and principal classes of objects.<br />
Proprietary Fund revenues are reported by major sources, and expenses are classified in<br />
essentially the same manner as those of similar business organizations, functions or<br />
activities.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 88
o<br />
o<br />
Proceeds of general long-term debt issues are classified separately from revenues and<br />
expenditures in the Governmental Fund financial statements.<br />
Transfers are classified separately from revenues and expenditures or expenses in the<br />
basic financial statements.<br />
<br />
Annual Financial Reports<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Appropriate interim financial statements and reports of financial position, operating<br />
results, and other pertinent information are prepared to facilitate management control of<br />
financial operations, legislative oversight, and, where necessary or desired, for external<br />
reporting purposes.<br />
An annual financial report is prepared and published, covering all funds and activities of<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>. The report includes an introductory section, the Management’s Discussion<br />
and Analysis (MD&A), basic financial statements, required supplementary information<br />
other than MD&A, combining and individual fund statements, schedules, narrative<br />
explanations, and statistics.<br />
The minimum requirements for MD&A, basic financial statements, and required<br />
supplementary information other than MD&A are:<br />
• Management’s Discussion and Analysis.<br />
• Basic financial statement, which includes:<br />
1. Government-wide financial statements<br />
2. Fund financial statements<br />
3. Notes to the financial statements<br />
• Required supplementary information other than MD&A.<br />
Overall summary of the State mandated principles and policies are:<br />
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) – The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> accounting system is kept in<br />
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and presents fairly and with full<br />
disclosure the funds and activities and results of financial operations in such a manner to<br />
determine and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions.<br />
Whenever conflicts exist between legal requirements and Generally Accepted Accounting<br />
Principles, the financial statements are prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted<br />
Accounting Principles, and additional schedules and/or narrative explanations are attached as<br />
necessary to satisfy or report legal compliance responsibilities and accountabilities.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 89
Fund Accounting – The accounting system is organized and operated on a fund basis. All funds<br />
of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> are accounted for and included on the end-of-year combined balance sheet. A fund<br />
is defined as a fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts recording cash<br />
and other financial resources, together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances,<br />
and changes therein, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or<br />
attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions or limitations.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> maintains only the minimum number of funds required for efficient operations.<br />
Central Accounting – Accounting for funds of the <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> are on an organization-wide basis<br />
covering all funds. Governmental, Proprietary and Fiduciary Fund types are the accounting<br />
responsibility of the district’s business office.<br />
Uniform Classifications and Terminology – <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> uses fund codes, mandatory account<br />
classifications and terminology prescribed in the Account Code section of the Resource Guide<br />
from the Texas Education Agency. General ledger accounts prescribing a double entry system<br />
and distribution of related payroll expenses with payroll are uniformly used throughout the<br />
budgeting, accounting and financial reporting system.<br />
<br />
Fund Equity and Other Credits - Fund equity is comprised of investments in capital assets (other<br />
credit), and contributed capital, net assets, assigned fund balance, unassigned, non-spendable,<br />
committed and restricted fund balance.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary Control/Encumbrance Accounting – The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> budget, as adopted, is recorded in<br />
the general ledger. Revenues and expenditures authorized in the budget are controlled in the<br />
accounting records and reported in the financial statements. Only the General Fund, Debt Service<br />
Fund and Food Service Fund are included in the adopted school district budget.<br />
To control budgeted fund commitments, the accounting system employs a method of<br />
encumbrance accounting. Encumbrances are documented by contracts, purchase orders, or<br />
other evidence showing binding commitments for goods or services.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Encumbrances outstanding at year end represent the estimated amount of the<br />
expenditures ultimately to result if unperformed contracts in process at year end are<br />
completed.<br />
Appropriations lapse at year end. Each outstanding encumbrance is evaluated and may<br />
or may not be carried forward. Only if there is intent and legal authorization to honor<br />
them, encumbrances outstanding at year end shall be a reservation of fund balance, and<br />
the subsequent year’s appropriations provide the authority to complete these<br />
transactions.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ary Basis of Accounting – The budgetary basis of accounting is consistently applied in<br />
budgeting, recording and reporting Foundation School Program (FSP) revenues in PEIMS<br />
information. Under the budgetary basis, earned and material FSP revenues that are collectible<br />
beyond 60 days are to be treated consistently for budgeting, recording and reporting through<br />
PEIMS and for tax rollback rate calculation purposes. The modified accrual basis of accounting is<br />
used for the Governmental Fund types.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 90
Account Alternatives – The accounting system allows certain flexibility in the recognition of<br />
relatively minor amounts of certain revenues and expenditures. Application of alternatives in<br />
accounting methods is consistently applied from accounting period to accounting period.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Monies collected in advance and the property tax levy recorded in the school district’s<br />
opening budget entries that will ultimately be recognized as revenues are recorded as<br />
deferred revenues and at the appropriate time are recognized as revenues of the<br />
accounting period to which they apply.<br />
Inventory item of materials, supplies, etc., may be considered expenditures/expenses<br />
either when purchased (purchases method) or when used (consumption method), but<br />
significant amounts of inventory shall be reported on the balance sheet.<br />
Expenditures/expenses for insurance and similar services extending over more than one<br />
accounting period are not allocated between or among accounting periods, but are<br />
accounted for as expenditures/expenses of the period of acquisition.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 91
Account Code Structure<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> adopts a standardized accounting system as required by Texas Education Code, section<br />
44.007, which meets all requirements prescribed by the State Board of Education and conforms to<br />
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The code structure includes a twenty-digit account<br />
code. Although certain codes within the overview are used at local option, the sequence of the codes<br />
within the structure, and the funds and chart of accounts, are uniformly used by all school districts in<br />
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.<br />
Table 45<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
The Code Structure<br />
Fund Function Object Sub-Object Organization Fiscal Yr Program Intent<br />
(3 digits) (2 digits) (4 digits) (2 digits) (3 digits) (1 digit) (2 digits) blank<br />
X X X - X X - X X X X - X X - X X X - X - X X - X XX<br />
Major<br />
FUND<br />
CODE<br />
(1XX –<br />
8XX)<br />
Account<br />
Groups<br />
(9XX)<br />
Detail<br />
Major<br />
Detail<br />
FUNCTION<br />
CODE<br />
(11-99)<br />
Major<br />
Account<br />
Classification<br />
Detail<br />
OBJECT EXPENSE CODE<br />
Assets (1XXX)<br />
Liabilities (2XXX)<br />
Fund Equity (3XXX)<br />
Clearing Accounts (4XXX)<br />
Revenue/Income (5XXX)<br />
Expenditures/<br />
Expenses (6XXX)<br />
Other Resources/Non-<br />
Operating Revenues/<br />
Residual Equity<br />
Transfers<br />
In (7XXX)<br />
Other Uses/Non-<br />
Operating<br />
Revenues/Residual<br />
Equity Transfers<br />
Out (8XXX)<br />
LOCAL<br />
OPTION<br />
CODES 1<br />
and 2<br />
(XX)<br />
ORGANIZATION<br />
CODE<br />
(XXX)<br />
FISCAL<br />
YEAR<br />
CODE<br />
(0-9)<br />
PROGRAM<br />
INTENT CODE<br />
(11-99)<br />
Indicates a mandatory code<br />
for State reporting<br />
purposes.<br />
Indicates a code that may<br />
be used at location option.<br />
LOCAL<br />
OPTION<br />
CODES<br />
3; 4 & 5<br />
(X; XX)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 92
Fund<br />
Codes<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
Account Code Structure<br />
Fund Codes<br />
Description<br />
Fund<br />
Codes<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
Description<br />
General Funds<br />
Special Revenue Funds (Cont.)<br />
161 O Athletics 286 R Title I-SIP Academy Grant-ARRA (Stimulus)<br />
162 O Medicaid 287 O Southeast <strong>Austin</strong> Youth Development<br />
195 O Contractual Obligations 288 O Solar for Schools-ARRA<br />
199 R General Fund 289 R TX Title I Priority-ARRA<br />
28A O Texas Regional Collaboratives<br />
Special Revenue Funds 28B O Capital Area Tech-Prep<br />
202 R Title VII Emergency Immigrant 28C O Elem School Counseling Program<br />
203 R Child Care Dev Block Grant 28D O Title I Part-D - ARRA (Stimulus)<br />
204 R Title IV- Safe & Drug Free 28E O TX Literacy Initiative<br />
206 R Title III-B Homeless children 28F O Homeless Education Disaster Assistance<br />
208 R SHAC Grant 28G O Title I SIP Regular - ARRA<br />
211 R Title I- Part A-Improving Basic Program 28H O Center for Disease Control & Prevention<br />
212 R Title I- Part C Migrant 28J O School Leadership Program<br />
215 O Title I- Part D 28K O Smaller Learning Communities<br />
216 O Title I- Part A-Add'l Assistance for School Improvement<br />
28L O Teen Parent Child Care<br />
220 O English Literacy Civics 28M O Title VI-A, Community Service<br />
222 R Learn & Serve America 28N O Teacher Incentive Grant (TIF)<br />
224 R IDEA-B Formula 28P O Adv Placement Fee Payment Incent<br />
225 R IDEA-B Preschool 28Q O Federal Health and Human Services Commission<br />
226 R IDEA-B Discretionary 28R O Title VI-A, Summer School LEP<br />
227 R IDEA-B Deaf 28S O Travis Co School Safety Consort<br />
228 R IDEA-B Preschool Deaf 28T O Emerg Response Sch Safety<br />
240 R National School Breakfast & Lunch Program 28U O Title I, Part A-Improving Basic Programs-ARRA<br />
242 R Summer Feeding Program 28V O Title V-Refugee and Entrant Assistance<br />
243 R Career and Technical- Technical Preparation 28W O Title IV-Hurricane Recovery<br />
244 R Career and Technical- Basic Grant 28X O Title X, Part C - Education for Homeless<br />
245 R Career and Technical- Single Parent O Children Act-ARRA<br />
253 R IDEA-C Early Intervention-Deaf 28Y O Early Learning Opportunities Act<br />
255 R T II-A Train/Recruiting 28Z O IDEA-B, Preschool-ARRA (Stimulus)<br />
256 R Comp School Reform Demo Prog 311 R SSA-Learn & Serve America<br />
259 R 30% Library Matching Funds-Fed 315 R SSA-IDEA-B-Discretionary<br />
261 R Reading First 316 R SSA-IDEA-B-Deaf<br />
262 R Enhancing Education Through Technology 317 R SSA-IDEA-B-Preschool-Deaf<br />
263 R Title III, Part A, English Language Acquisition & 340 R SSA-IDEA-C-Early Intervention Deaf<br />
Language Enhancement 349 R TARGET Grant<br />
264 R Title IV Community Service Learning 367 R Trav Co Sch Safe-Fiscal Agent<br />
265 R 21st Century Community Learning 368 O Emerg Resp Schl Safety<br />
266 R ARRA of 2009, Title XIV, State Fiscal Stab Fund 383 R Prof Staff Develop<br />
279 R Title II, Part D, Sub 1 -Enhancing Education Through 384 R Texas After School Initiative<br />
Technology-ARRA (Stimulus) 385 R Visually Impaired<br />
280 R Texas Homeless Education American Recovery 386 R Regional Day School for the Deaf<br />
283 R IDEA-B-Formula-ARRA (Stimulus) 390 R Early Childhood Limited English Proficient<br />
284 O Safe School/Healthy Students Grant- Summer Program<br />
285 O American Indian Education Project 392 R Non-Education Community- Based Support<br />
286 R Title I-SIP Academy Grant-ARRA (Stimulus) 393 R Texas Successful Schools Program<br />
287 O Southeast <strong>Austin</strong> Youth Development 394 R Student Parent Grant<br />
288 O Solar for Schools-ARRA 395 Comprehensive Dev Guide<br />
279 R Title II, Part D, Sub 1 -Enhancing Education Through 397 R Advanced Placement Incentives<br />
Technology-ARRA (Stimulus) 399 R Investment Capital Grant<br />
280 R Texas Homeless Education American Recovery 401 R Optional Extended Year<br />
283 R IDEA-B-Formula-ARRA (Stimulus) 404 R Accelerated Reading Instruction<br />
284 O IDEA-B-Preschool-ARRA (Stimulus) 40A O Algebra Readiness<br />
285 O American Indian Education Project 40B O College Readiness-MS Students<br />
409 R High School Completion & Success Grant<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 93
Fund Codes (continued)<br />
O=Optional<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
R=Required<br />
Fund<br />
Fund<br />
Description<br />
Codes<br />
Codes<br />
Description<br />
Special Revenue Funds (Cont.)<br />
Special Revenue Funds (Cont.)<br />
42S O Texas State University 49R O Annenberg Foundation<br />
42T O Emergency Response Fund 49S O Applied Materials Foundation<br />
42U O Texas School Ready Grant 49T O Texas High School Project (Gates)<br />
42V O TEA-Limited English Proficient Student Success 49U O Lowe's Charitable and Educational Foundation<br />
435 R Regional Day School for the Deaf 49V O A Glimmer of Hope <strong>Austin</strong> Foundation<br />
461 R Principal and Administrative Activity 49W O ST David's Foundation<br />
479 R Permanent Fund 49X O State Technology Advancement Collaborative<br />
481 O ACC Adult Basic Education 49Y O National Education Association<br />
482 O Social Emotional Learning 410 R State Textbook Fund<br />
483 O Motorola 411 R Technology Allotment<br />
484 O Dell Foundation 413 R Telecomm Infrastructure Fd<br />
485 O RGK Foundation 414 R Texas Reading, Math and Science Initiative<br />
486 O Intel Teach 415 R Pre-K Grant<br />
488 O Target Grant 417 R Education Technology Pilot<br />
489 O Advanced Micro Devices 418 R Suppl Compensation-HB 3343<br />
48A O TX Regional Collaboratives 419 R TDPRS-Parent as Teachers<br />
48B O Synopsys Community Fund 421 R Master Reading Teacher<br />
48C O Lowe's 422 R AP/IB Incentive Equip & Materials<br />
48D O Education of Young Women 424 R Future Problem Solvers<br />
48E O Tides Foundation 425 O TWC Apprenticeship<br />
48F O <strong>Austin</strong> Library Foundation 426 R Sustainability<br />
48G O S.M.E. Education Foundation 427 O TX After School Init - Middle School<br />
48H O Health Industry Steering Committee (HISC) 428 R High School Allotment HB1<br />
48J O Asia Society 429 O Read to Succeed<br />
48K O Capital Fund For Education 42A O Master Reading Teacher<br />
48L O IBM Grant 42B O Jr Master Garener<br />
48M O The Laura Bush Foundation for Libraries 42C O Rider 67, Library Match<br />
48N O Babcock & Brown 42D O Intl Baccalaureate Midl Yr Pro<br />
48P O Dollar General 42E O TX Parks & Wildlife-Outdoor Ed<br />
48Q O National Wildlife Federation 42F O Texas Bar Foundation<br />
48R O Capital Area Council of Governments (CAPCOG) 42G O Teacher Supply Reimbursement<br />
48T O Dairy Max-Fuel Up Play 42H O Texas Dept of Agriculture<br />
492 O KDK-Harman Foundation 42I O UT support for 7th Graders<br />
493 O Colony Park Improvements 42J O Texas Tobacco Grant<br />
494 O Community Education - City 42K O Texas Health & Human Services Commission<br />
495 O Community Development - Block -City 42L O Texas Educator Excellence Award Program<br />
496 O Met Life-New Teacher Center 42M O Texas Dept of Transportation<br />
497 O Sooch Fund/Pietruszynski 42N O Texas Fitness Now Grant<br />
498 O Moody Foundation 42P O HB1-Begin Teacher Induction & Mentoring<br />
499 O Washington Mutual 42Q O District Awards for Teacher Excellence<br />
49C O Intel Foundation 42R O Governors Educator Excellence Awards Prog<br />
49D<br />
O Raise Up Texas Grant<br />
49E O FIRST in TX-TWC Debt Service Fund<br />
49F O H-E-B Excellence in Teaching 511 O Debt Service Fund<br />
49G<br />
O <strong>Austin</strong> Energy<br />
49H O Community Education -County Capital Project Funds<br />
49J O 3M Ingenuity Grant 628 O 1996 Issue: Bond Sale No. 1<br />
49K O Powell Foundation 629 O Capital Projects '97<br />
49L O Advanced Placement Strategies 630 O Capital Projects '98<br />
49M O Meadows Foundation 631 O Erate Reimbursements<br />
49N O STEPS to a Healthier Community 633 O 2002-A G.O.Bond<br />
49P O NCCEP/SBC Gear Up Supplement 634 O 2002 Q.Z.A. Bond<br />
49Q O <strong>Austin</strong> Partners in Education 635 O 2004-A G.O. Bond<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 94
Fund Codes (continued)<br />
O=Optional<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
R=Required<br />
Fund<br />
Fund<br />
Description<br />
Codes<br />
Codes<br />
Description<br />
Capital Project Funds (Cont.)<br />
Fiduciary Fund Types<br />
635 O 2004-A G.O. Bond 805 O Barbara Jordan Memorial<br />
636 O 2002-B G.O. Bond 806 O Expendable Trust Fund<br />
637 O Commercial Paper 826 O Youth Orchestra<br />
638 O 2005-A G.O. Bond<br />
639 O 2005-B Q.Z.A. Bond Trust Funds-Non Expendable<br />
640 O 2006 Q.Z.A. Bond 836 O Non Expendable Trust<br />
641 O 2008 Q.Z.A. Bond<br />
642 O Commercial Paper-2008 Bond Program Agency Funds<br />
648 O 2004-Sch Bldg & Refunding Bonds 865 R Student Activity Account<br />
649 O 2008-Sch Bldg & Refunding Bonds 876 O GAATN<br />
Enterprise Funds<br />
General Fixed Asset Account Group<br />
717 O Child Care Program 901 R General Capital Assets<br />
902 R Long Term Debt<br />
Internal Service Funds<br />
752 R Print Shop and Reproduction<br />
753 R Workers Comp Self Insurance<br />
75A O Health Self-Insurance Fund<br />
771 O Campus Police<br />
772 O Laundry Service-Clifton<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 95
11 Instruction<br />
Function Codes<br />
23 School Leadership<br />
This function is used for activities that<br />
deal directly with the interaction between<br />
teachers and students in a school<br />
classroom, in other locations such as a<br />
home or hospital, and in other learning<br />
situations. It may also be provided<br />
through some other approved medium<br />
such as television, radio, telephone,<br />
telecommunications, multimedia and<br />
correspondence. This function includes<br />
expenditures/expenses for direct<br />
classroom instruction and other activities<br />
that deliver enhance or direct the delivery<br />
of learning situations to students.<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Services<br />
This function is used for expenditures /<br />
expenses that are directly and exclusively<br />
used for resource centers, establishing<br />
and maintaining libraries and other major<br />
facilities dealing with education resources<br />
and media.<br />
13 Curriculum Development and Instructional<br />
Staff Development<br />
This function is used for expenditures /<br />
expenses that are directly and exclusively<br />
used to aid instructional staff in planning,<br />
developing and evaluating the process of<br />
providing learning experiences for<br />
students. Expenditures and expenses<br />
include in-service training and other staff<br />
development for instructional or<br />
instructional-related personnel. This<br />
function also includes expenditures and<br />
expenses related to research and<br />
development of new or modified<br />
instructional methods, techniques,<br />
procedures, services, etc.<br />
21 Instructional Leadership<br />
This function is used for expenditures or<br />
expenses that are directly used for<br />
managing, directing, supervising and<br />
providing leadership for staff who provide<br />
general and special instructional services.<br />
31<br />
32<br />
This function is used for expenditures and/or<br />
expenses that are used to direct and manage<br />
a school campus. They include the activities<br />
performed by the principal, assistant<br />
principals, and other assistants while they –<br />
Supervise all operations of the<br />
campus.<br />
Evaluate staff members of the<br />
campus.<br />
<br />
<br />
Assign duties to staff members<br />
Maintain the records of students on<br />
the campus<br />
Guidance, Counseling & Evaluation Services<br />
This function is used for expenditures /<br />
expenses that are directly and exclusively<br />
used for assessing and testing students’<br />
abilities, aptitudes and interests; counseling<br />
students with respect to career and<br />
educational opportunities and helping them<br />
establish realistic goals. This function<br />
includes cost of psychological services,<br />
identification of individual characteristics,<br />
testing, educational counseling, student<br />
evaluation and occupational counseling.<br />
Social Work Services<br />
This function is used for expenditures and/or<br />
expenses that are directly and exclusively<br />
used for activities such as:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Investigating and diagnosing student<br />
social needs arising out of the home,<br />
school or community.<br />
Casework and group work services<br />
for the child, parent or both.<br />
Interpreting the social needs of<br />
students for other staff members.<br />
Promoting modifications of the<br />
circumstances surrounding the<br />
individual students which are related<br />
to his or her social needs. (This<br />
includes referrals to and interaction<br />
with other governmental agencies).<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 96
33<br />
Health Services<br />
Function Codes (continued)<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities (continued)<br />
34<br />
This function is used for<br />
expenditures/expenses that are directly<br />
and exclusively used for providing<br />
physical health service to students. This<br />
includes activities that provide students<br />
with appropriate medical, dental and<br />
nursing services.<br />
Student Transportation<br />
This function is used for expenditures /<br />
expenses that are incurred for<br />
transporting students to and from school.<br />
Expenditures / expenses for regular bus<br />
routes to and from school are to be<br />
recorded using program intent code 99<br />
(undistributed) or organization code 998<br />
(unallocated, local option).<br />
Expenditures/expenses for transportation<br />
specially and exclusively for purposes of<br />
transporting students relating to<br />
enhanced program intents such as<br />
Career and Technical and Services to<br />
Students with Disabilities (Special<br />
Education), etc., are to be recorded in<br />
function 34 with the appropriate program<br />
intent codes.<br />
41<br />
51<br />
improvement of skills in either a competitive<br />
or noncompetitive setting. Extracurricular<br />
activities include athletics and other activities<br />
that normally involve competition between<br />
schools (and frequently involve offsetting<br />
gate receipts or fees such as football,<br />
baseball, volleyball, track and tennis). Other<br />
kinds of related activities are included (such<br />
as drill teams, pep squad and cheerleading,<br />
University Interscholastic League competition<br />
such as one-act plays, speech, debate,<br />
band, Future Farmers of America (FFA),<br />
National Honor Society, etc.).<br />
General Administration<br />
This function is for expenditures / expenses<br />
that are for purposes of managing or<br />
governing the school district as an overall<br />
entity. This function covers multiple activities<br />
that are not directly and exclusively used for<br />
cost applicable to specific functions. General<br />
Administration is an indirect cost applicable<br />
to other expenditure functions of a School<br />
District.<br />
Facilities Maintenance and Operations<br />
35<br />
Food Services<br />
This function is used for food service<br />
operation expenditures/expenses,<br />
including the cost of food, labor, and<br />
other expenditures / expenses necessary<br />
for the preparation, transportation and<br />
storage of food to provide to students<br />
and staff. Expenditures / expenses are<br />
used directly and exclusively for<br />
supervision and maintenance of a food<br />
service operation.<br />
52<br />
This function is used for expenditures and/or<br />
expenses for activities to keep the facilities<br />
and grounds open, clean, comfortable and in<br />
effective working condition and state of<br />
repair, and insured. This function is used to<br />
record expenditures/expenses for the<br />
maintenance and operations of the physical<br />
facilities and grounds. This function also<br />
includes expenditures / expenses associated<br />
with warehousing and receiving services.<br />
Security and Monitoring Services<br />
36<br />
Extracurricular Activities<br />
This function is used for expenditures /<br />
expenses for school-sponsored activities<br />
outside of the school day. These<br />
activities are generally designed to<br />
provide students with experiences such<br />
as motivation and the enjoyment and<br />
This function is used for expenditures and<br />
expenses that are for activities to keep<br />
student and staff surroundings safe, whether<br />
in transit to or from school, on a campus or<br />
participating in school-sponsored events at<br />
another location.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 97
53<br />
61<br />
Data Processing Services<br />
Function Codes (continued)<br />
81<br />
This function is for expenditures and<br />
expenses for data processing services,<br />
whether in-house or contracted. Examples<br />
of function 53 costs are costs for computer<br />
facility management; computer processing;<br />
system development; analysis of<br />
workflows, processes and requirements;<br />
coding, testing, debugging and<br />
documentation; system integration; design<br />
of applications; maintenance of programs<br />
and networks; and those interfacing costs<br />
associated with general types of technical<br />
assistance to data users. Specific types of<br />
applications include student account,<br />
financial account, and human<br />
resources/personnel. Personal computers<br />
that are stand alone are to be charged to<br />
the appropriate function. Peripherals<br />
including terminal and printers are to be<br />
charged to the appropriate minicomputers,<br />
servers, and networked or stand alone<br />
microcomputers that provide services to<br />
multiple functions are to be recorded here.<br />
Community Services<br />
This function is used for expenditures that<br />
are for activities or purposes other than<br />
regular public education and adult basic<br />
education services. These types of<br />
expenditures are used for services or<br />
activities relating to the whole community.<br />
This includes providing resources to nonpublic<br />
schools, institutions of higher<br />
education, and any proprietary types of<br />
services incurred for outside entities in the<br />
community.<br />
91<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction,<br />
con’t.<br />
equipping, and/or making additions to<br />
real property and sites, including lease<br />
and capital lease transactions.<br />
Contracted Instructional Services<br />
Between Public Schools<br />
This function code is used for the<br />
following types of expenditures:<br />
<br />
<br />
Providing financial resources<br />
for services in another public<br />
school through a contract for<br />
education of nonresident<br />
students under Subchapter E,<br />
Chapter 41, TEC.<br />
Purchasing attendance credits<br />
from the State under<br />
subchapter D, Chapter 41,<br />
TEC.<br />
93 Payments to Fiscal Agent/Member<br />
Districts of Shared Service<br />
Arrangements<br />
This function code is used for the<br />
following types of expenditures:<br />
Payments from a member<br />
district to a fiscal agent of a<br />
shared service arrangement; or,<br />
<br />
Payments from a fiscal agent to<br />
a member district of a shared<br />
service arrangement.<br />
71<br />
81<br />
Debt Service<br />
This function is used for expenditures that<br />
are for the payment of debt principals and<br />
interests.<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
This function is used by School Districts for<br />
expenditures that are for acquiring,<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges<br />
This function is used to report<br />
administrative functions not required to<br />
be reported in Function 41- General<br />
Administration. The fees for property<br />
appraisal and tax collection are paid<br />
from this function.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 98
Local<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
Object Description<br />
Revenue Object Codes<br />
5711 R Taxes- Current Year Levy<br />
5712 R Taxes- Prior Years<br />
5719 R Penalty & Interest- Other Tax Revenues<br />
5739 R Tuition & Fees from Local Services<br />
5742 R Earnings from Temporary Deposits and Investments<br />
5743 R Rent Revenues<br />
5744 R Foundations, Gifts and Bequests<br />
5745 R Insurance Recovery<br />
5748 O Revenue from City, County, Higher Education<br />
Food Service Fund- Prepaid Meals<br />
5749 R Other Revenues from Local Sources<br />
5751 R Food Service Activity<br />
5752 R Athletic Activities<br />
5754 R Interfund Service Provided and Used Interfund Transactions<br />
5755 R Enterprising Services Revenue<br />
5769 R Misc Rev from Intermediate Srcs<br />
State<br />
Object Description<br />
5811 R Per Capita Apportionment<br />
5812 R Foundation School Program<br />
5816 O State Indirect Costs<br />
5817 O PY State Rev Adjustments<br />
5819 R Other Foundation School Program Act Revenues<br />
5829 R State Program Revenue distributed by Texas Education Agency<br />
5831 R TRS on Behalf Payment<br />
5839 R State of Texas Government Agencies other than TEA<br />
Federal<br />
Object Description<br />
5916 O Federal Indirect Costs<br />
5919 R Federal Revenues Distributed Through Government Entities<br />
Other than State or Federal Agencies<br />
5921 R School Breakfast Program<br />
5922 R National School Lunch Program<br />
5923 R USDA Donated Commodities<br />
5927 O After School Snack Program<br />
5929 R Federal Revenue Distributed by the Texas Education Agency<br />
5931 R School Health & Related Services (SHARS)<br />
5932 R Medicaid Administrative Claiming Program (MAC)<br />
5939 R Federal Revenues Distributed by State of Texas Gov. Agencies<br />
other than Texas Education Agency<br />
5946 O Building America Bond Subsidy<br />
5949 R Federal Revenues Distributed Directly From Fed.<br />
5952 R Shared Service Arrangement-Federal Revenues from Fiscal Agent<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 99
Expenditure Object Codes<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
6100 Payroll Costs<br />
6112 R Substitute Teachers<br />
6116 O Substitute for Other Professionals<br />
6117 O Career Ladder<br />
6118 O Extra Duty/Signing Bonus Pay<br />
6119 R Professional Salaries<br />
6121 R Extra Duty/Overtime<br />
6122 R Subs for Support Personnel<br />
6125 O Part-Time Hourly<br />
6129 R Salaries for Support Personnel<br />
6139 R Employee Allowance<br />
6141 R Social Security/Medicare<br />
6142 R Group Health & Life Insurance<br />
6143 R Wk's Comp<br />
6144 R TRS On Behalf Payments<br />
6145 R Unemp Comp<br />
6146 R Teacher Retirement<br />
6148 O Salary Adjustments<br />
6149 R Other Employee Benefits<br />
6200 Professional & Contracted Services<br />
6211 R Legal Services<br />
6212 R Audit Services<br />
6213 R Tax Appraisal & Collection<br />
6219 R Professional Services<br />
6221 R Staff Tuition & Fees-Higher Education<br />
6222 R Student Tuition-Public Schools<br />
6223 R Student Tuition-Other than Public School<br />
6224 R Student Attendance Credits<br />
6229 R Other Tuition & Transfer Payments<br />
6239 R Education Service Center Services<br />
6244 O Maint: Furniture & Equipment<br />
6245 O Maint: Vehicles<br />
6246 O Maint: Bldg & Grounds<br />
6247 O Design Fees<br />
6249 R Equipment Maintenance Repairs<br />
6255 O Water, Wastewater, Sanitation<br />
6256 O Telephone, Telecom, Cell Phone<br />
6257 O Electricity<br />
6258 O Gas & Other Fuels<br />
6259 R Other Utilities<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 100
Expenditure Object Codes (continued)<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
6200 Professional & Contracted Services (Cont.)<br />
6291 R Consulting Services<br />
6294 O Cont Srvs-Portable Bldg<br />
6295 O Contract-Metro/Harris Transp<br />
6298 O Miscellaneous Contracted Srvcs<br />
6299 R Reproduction Services<br />
6300 Supplies & Materials<br />
6311 R Gasoline & Other Fuels<br />
6319 R Custodial/Maint Supplies<br />
6321 R Textbooks<br />
6329 R Reading Materials including Library Books<br />
6339 R Testing Materials<br />
6341 R Food<br />
6342 R Non Food<br />
6344 R USDA Donated Commodities<br />
6349 R Other Food Service Supplies<br />
6396 O Computer Related Equipment >$300 &
Expenditure Object Codes (continued)<br />
O=Optional<br />
R=Required<br />
6500 Debt Service<br />
6511 R Bond Principal<br />
6512 R Capital Lease Principal<br />
6513 R Long Term Debt Principal<br />
6521 R Interest on Bonds<br />
6523 R Interest on Debt<br />
6599 R Other Debt Service Fees<br />
6600 Capital Outlay<br />
6619 R Land Purchase<br />
6624 O Engineering Fees<br />
6625 O Building Improvements<br />
6626 O Geotech Testing<br />
6627 O City and County Fees<br />
6629 R Other Costs To Bldg Purchase<br />
6631 R Vehicles<br />
6639 R Equipment > $5000 Per Unit<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 102
Table 46<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Function/Program Intent Code Matrix<br />
199.12.6119.00.002.1.99.0.00<br />
Program Intent Codes<br />
Function<br />
Codes<br />
11<br />
Instructional<br />
Related<br />
Service<br />
12<br />
Instructional<br />
Resources &<br />
Media<br />
Services<br />
13<br />
Instructional<br />
Staff<br />
Development<br />
21<br />
Instructional<br />
Leadership<br />
11<br />
Instruction<br />
21<br />
Gifted &<br />
Talented<br />
22<br />
Career &<br />
Technology<br />
23<br />
Special<br />
Education<br />
24<br />
Accelerated<br />
Learning<br />
25<br />
ESL<br />
Bilingual<br />
30<br />
State<br />
Comp<br />
Ed<br />
31<br />
High<br />
School<br />
Allotment<br />
32<br />
Pre-K<br />
99<br />
Generic<br />
23<br />
School<br />
Leadership<br />
31<br />
Guidance<br />
Counseling &<br />
Evaluation<br />
32<br />
Social Work<br />
Services<br />
33<br />
Health<br />
Services<br />
34<br />
Transportation<br />
35<br />
Student<br />
Nutrition<br />
36<br />
Co-Curricular<br />
Extracurricular<br />
Activities<br />
41-99<br />
All Others<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 103
Significant Financial Policies & Procedures<br />
Measurement Focus – The government-wide financial statements are reported using the flow of<br />
economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the Proprietary Fund<br />
type financial statements. All Governmental Funds are accounted for “spending” or “financial flow”<br />
measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. This means that only current assets<br />
and current liabilities are generally included on their balance sheets. The reported fund balance of<br />
Governmental Funds is considered a measure of “available spendable resources”. The Fiduciary Fund<br />
financial statement does not have a measurement focus.<br />
Cash Management – Developing an effective cash management program can provide the district with<br />
additional revenues to fund essential programs and operations. Maximizing the return on invested funds,<br />
while ensuring the safety and liquidity of investments, has become a high priority for the district. Effective<br />
cash management programs:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Provide high rates of return through the use of various investment instruments.<br />
Are based on a comprehensive written investment policy approved by the Board.<br />
Allow personnel to become skilled in investment procedures and techniques and stay abreast of<br />
current money markets.<br />
The Board of Trustees adopted an investment policy (CDA-Legal) regarding investment of funds as<br />
defined by the Public Fund Investment Act. This policy authorizes the district to invest any and all of its<br />
funds in fully collateralized certificates of deposit, direct debt securities of the United States of America or<br />
the State of Texas, other obligations the principal and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by<br />
the State of Texas or the United States, fully collateralized direct repurchase agreements, bankers’<br />
acceptances, local government investment pools, money market mutual funds, and other investments<br />
specifically allowed by Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code (the Public Funds Investment Act)<br />
and Sections 23.80 and 20.42 of the Texas Education Code. The district accrues interest on temporary<br />
investments based on the terms and effective interest rates of the specific investments. The district’s<br />
policy is to report all highly liquid debt instruments, such as local government investment pools, treasury<br />
and agency obligations, with a remaining maturity of one year or less at the time of purchase, at<br />
amortized cost and all other investments at fair value.<br />
Debt Management – For the past decade and in the foreseeable future, the district has and will continue<br />
to experience bond elections authorizing new bonds and a continual issuance of bonds. The district<br />
receives a credit enhanced bond rating of AAA for its bonds that are guaranteed by the State of Texas<br />
Permanent School Fund (PSF). The district’s underlying ratings are: Moody’s (Aaa), Standard & Poor's<br />
(AA+), and Fitch (‘AA’). A financial advisor is employed to assist the district in managing its debt.<br />
As of August 31, 2012, it is projected the district will have $749,569,757 in outstanding general obligation<br />
bonds. The outstanding debt represents approximately 1.21 percent of the district’s net taxable value<br />
(before freeze).<br />
Currently the district has two bond programs, 2004 and 2008. The 2004 bond program is almost at the<br />
end stage and the 2008 bond program has started in 2008 to address overcrowding and provide funds to<br />
build a district-wide performing arts center.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 104
Voter<br />
Approved<br />
Table 47<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Current Bond Authorization Status<br />
Recap of Bond<br />
Authorization<br />
Bonds Issued To<br />
Date<br />
Authorized /<br />
Unissued Bonds<br />
2004 $ 519,526,616 $ 466,770,137 $ 52,756,479<br />
2008 $ 343,717,819 $ 167,166,109 $ 176,551,710 *<br />
*As of 07/26/2012, the district has $43,285,000 in outstanding commercial paper.<br />
In order to minimize the tax impact, negative arbitrage, and reduce overall borrowing costs associated<br />
with the financing of projects authorized by its bond elections, the district established a commercial paper<br />
programs in July 2005. While numerous other Texas government entities have established commercial<br />
paper programs over the years, this program was new for school districts in Texas. The district utilizes its<br />
commercial paper programs to reduce its ongoing costs of capital projects and to provide interim<br />
financing during the construction periods for projects. When the district nears its commercial paper<br />
capacity it issues refunding bonds to refund a long-term basis the interim financing provided by the<br />
commercial paper. Commercial paper is a short-term note with maturities ranging from 1 day to 270 days.<br />
Objectives of <strong>Budget</strong>ing - A budget is considered balanced when the revenues and other resources that<br />
are generated to finance the budget equal its estimated expenditures and other uses.<br />
Performance evaluation allows citizens and taxpayers to hold policy makers and administrators<br />
accountable for their actions. Because accountability to citizens often is stated explicitly in State laws and<br />
constitutions, it is considered a cornerstone of budgeting and financial reporting. The Governmental<br />
Accounting Standard Board (GASB) recognizes its importance with these objectives in its GASB<br />
Concepts Statement No. 1:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Financial reporting should provide information to determine whether current-year revenues were<br />
sufficient to pay for current-year services.<br />
Financial reporting should demonstrate whether resources were obtained and used in<br />
accordance with the entity’s legally adopted budget. It should also demonstrate compliance with<br />
other finance-related legal or contractual requirements.<br />
Financial reporting should provide information to assist users in assessing the service efforts,<br />
costs and accomplishments of the governmental entity.<br />
Meeting these objectives requires budget preparation to include several concepts recognizing<br />
accountability. Often these concepts have been mandated for State and local public sector budgets. They<br />
include requirements that budgets should:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Be balanced so that current revenues are sufficient to pay for current services.<br />
Be prepared in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local legal mandates and<br />
requirements.<br />
Provide a basis for the evaluation of a government’s service efforts, costs and accomplishments.<br />
Although the objective of balanced budgets is generally applicable to the district to ensure long-term fiscal<br />
health, the Board of Trustees allows variations of this objective over short-term periods from time to time.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 105
For example, the balanced budget objective may be met through the use of fund balance reserves to pay<br />
for current services during certain school years. Such uses of fund balance reserves must be in<br />
accordance with applicable state and local fund balance policies.<br />
Fund Balance Reserves<br />
Reserves have been established in the Governmental Funds financial statements to indicate that a<br />
portion of the fund balance is not available for appropriation for expenditure, or is legally segregated for a<br />
specific future use. Designations of fund equity are the representations of management for the utilization<br />
of financial resources in future periods.<br />
The Board has established a policy that requires the district to maintain a minimum of 14 percent of<br />
operating expenditures in its General Fund balance.<br />
Fund balance is the net difference between the assets and liabilities of a fund. In much the same way as<br />
a homeowner maintains a savings account for unexpected emergencies, having a healthy fund balance<br />
enables the district to cover operating costs during low cash periods. Further, the district saves millions of<br />
dollars as a result of securing lower interest rates through strong bond ratings. Ensuring an adequate<br />
reserve level is essential to maintaining high bond ratings and supporting unplanned needs and<br />
emergencies. The following table provides a ten year history of the district’s reserve levels. A<strong>ISD</strong> will<br />
continue to maintain a prudent reserve of at least 14 percent of expenditures to ensure sound fiscal<br />
health.<br />
In FY2012, the district implemented the new requirement from GASB 54 to divide the fund balances into<br />
five different categories, including non-spendable, restricted, committed, assigned and unassigned.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
General Fund - The district has determined its priority to maintain the General Fund’s fund<br />
balance at a level not less than 14 percent of the budgeted expenditures of the district General<br />
Fund. The Texas Education Agency has a rule to compute the optimum unassigned fund balance<br />
equal to the estimated amount to cover cash flow deficits in the General Fund for the fall period in<br />
the following fiscal year, plus estimated average monthly cash disbursements of the general Fund<br />
for the nine months following the fiscal year. An appropriate fund balance level is one of the<br />
measurements for the School First (Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas) program required<br />
for all school districts in the State. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the district will utilize $28 million from the fund<br />
balance to cover the deficit of the General Fund budget.<br />
Food Service – The district maintains a sufficient fund balance to cover three months of average<br />
expenditures for the Food Service operations. In the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year, the district will utilize<br />
$582,456 from the fund balance to cover the deficit of the Food Service budget.<br />
Debt Service Fund – The district maintains a sufficient fund balance to cover the upcoming<br />
obligations on the required payment date. In the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year, the district will utilize<br />
$462,627 from the fund balance to cover the deficit of the Debt Service budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 106
Millions<br />
$92<br />
$81<br />
$82<br />
$145<br />
$152<br />
$146<br />
$172<br />
$219<br />
$248<br />
$220<br />
Table 48<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund - Fund Balance (In Millions)<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
$120.6<br />
$129.9 $121.0<br />
$148.3<br />
$179.6<br />
$199.1<br />
$184.6<br />
100<br />
$66.5 $60.7 $57.9<br />
50<br />
0<br />
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Total General Fund Fund Balance<br />
Unassigned General Fund Fund Balance<br />
14.0% Requirement Optimal Cash Flow for 2.5 Months<br />
Risk Management<br />
The district’s risk management program encompasses various means of protecting the district against<br />
losses. Various risks of loss include those related to torts, theft, damage, destruction of assets, business<br />
interruption, errors and omissions, injuries to employees, and disasters.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The district participates in the Texas Association of School Boards Modified Self-Funded program<br />
for its general liability, professional/legal liability and vehicle liability insurance.<br />
The district partners with the Texas Association of School Boards for the administration of its selffunded<br />
Workers’ Compensation insurance.<br />
The district is self-insured up to $400,000 per occurrence for losses related to workers’<br />
compensation and has purchased excess coverage through a commercial insurer licensed in the<br />
State of Texas.<br />
The district has commercial insurance for all other risks of loss.<br />
The district provides employee access to health, group life, disability and dental insurance as well<br />
as Cafeteria 125 deferred tax benefit options.<br />
The district is self-insured up to $350,000 per claim for losses incurred in the health insurance<br />
program and has purchased excess coverage through a commercial insurer licensed in the State<br />
of Texas.<br />
Independent Audit & Financial Reporting<br />
The Texas Education Code requires that school districts are audited annually. The audit is made on an<br />
organization-wide basis and involves all fund types and account groups of the school district. The audit is<br />
also designed to meet the requirements of the Federal Single Audit Act of 1984 and the related provisions<br />
of OMB Circular A-133 “Audits of State, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations.” Upon<br />
completion, the annual financial report is submitted to the Texas Education Agency for review. The<br />
financial report is designed to meet specific monitoring needs of the Texas Education Agency.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 107
<strong>Budget</strong> Policies & Development Procedures<br />
State Requirements<br />
Sections 44.002 through 44.006 of the Texas Education Code establish the legal basis for budget<br />
development in School districts. The following items summarize the legal requirements of the code:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Superintendent is the budget officer for the district and prepares or causes the budget to be<br />
prepared.<br />
The district budget must be prepared by a date set by the State Board of Education, currently<br />
August 31. In order for the budget to be adopted by the Board of Trustees, the district budget<br />
must be prepared by August 20.<br />
The President of the Board of Trustees must call a public meeting of the Board of Trustees, giving<br />
ten days public notice in a newspaper, for the adoption of the district budget. Any taxpayer in the<br />
district may be present and participate in the meeting.<br />
Concurrently with the publication of notice of the budget, the district must post a summary of the<br />
proposed budget on its website. The summary of the budget is presented in the following function<br />
areas:<br />
o Instruction – functions 11, 12, 13<br />
o Instructional Support- functions 21, 23, 31, 32, 33, 36<br />
o Central Administration – function 41<br />
o District Operations – functions 51, 52, 53, 34, 35<br />
The budget document of the district complied with all the above requirements.<br />
Legal Requirements<br />
Legal requirements are formulated by the State, TEA and the local district. Additional requirements from<br />
TEA include:<br />
<br />
<br />
The budget must be adopted by the Board of Trustees, inclusive of amendments, no later than<br />
August 31.<br />
Minutes from the district Board Meetings will be used by TEA to record adoptions of and<br />
amendments to the budget.<br />
<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>s for the General Fund, the Food Service Fund (whether accounted for in the General<br />
Fund, Special Revenue Fund, or Enterprise Fund), and the Debt Service Fund must be included<br />
in the official district budget. These budgets must be prepared and approved, at least at the fund<br />
and function levels, to comply with the State’s legal level of control mandates.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 108
The officially adopted budget, as amended, must be filed with TEA through Public Education<br />
Information Management System (PEIMS) by the date prescribed in the annual system<br />
guidelines. Revenue, other sources, other uses<br />
and fund balances must be reported by fund, object, fiscal year and amount. Expenditures must<br />
be reported by fund, function, object, organization, fiscal year, program intent and amount.<br />
A school district must amend the Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> before exceeding a functional expenditure<br />
category, i.e., instruction, administration, etc., in the total district budget. The Annual Financial<br />
and Compliance Report should reflect the Amended <strong>Budget</strong> amounts on the schedule comparing<br />
budgeted and actual amounts. The requirement for filing the amended budget with TEA is<br />
satisfied when the school district files its Annual Financial and Compliance Report.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 109
District<br />
Goals<br />
Goal # 1:<br />
All students will<br />
perform at or<br />
above grade<br />
level.<br />
Goal # 2:<br />
Achievement<br />
gaps among all<br />
student groups<br />
will be<br />
eliminated.<br />
Goal # 3:<br />
All students will<br />
graduate ready<br />
for college,<br />
career, and life<br />
in a globally<br />
competitive<br />
economy.<br />
Goal # 4:<br />
All schools will<br />
meet or exceed<br />
state<br />
accountability<br />
standards, and<br />
the district will<br />
meet federal<br />
standards and<br />
exceed state<br />
standards.<br />
Board Goals, Strategies to Achieve Goals, and<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Parameters<br />
How To<br />
Achieve The Goals<br />
1. Provide a high quality,<br />
well-rounded<br />
educational experience<br />
to all students that is<br />
rigorous, culturally<br />
relevant, healthful, and<br />
engaging.<br />
2. Build strong<br />
relationships with<br />
students, families, and<br />
the community to<br />
increase trust and<br />
shared responsibility.<br />
3. Ensure that every<br />
classroom has a highquality,<br />
effective<br />
educator, supported by<br />
high-quality, effective<br />
administrators and<br />
support staff.<br />
4. Align resources to<br />
accomplish priorities<br />
within a balanced<br />
budget.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Parameters<br />
1. The Board seeks to maintain an unassigned fund balance<br />
consistent with district policy in an effort to (1) maintain a bond<br />
rating of Aaa or higher, (2) a “Superior” financial rating from the<br />
State and to (3) ensure a sufficient operating reserve to support<br />
operating costs for at least two months.<br />
2. The Board recognizes its fiduciary responsibility to adopt a balanced<br />
budget and will seek to do so by considering all cost savings and<br />
efficiency options.<br />
3. If projected expenditures exceed projected revenue and budget<br />
reductions become necessary, the district will first seek those<br />
options that are sustainable and will address structural imbalances<br />
on a multi-year basis. One-time solutions, including the use of fund<br />
balance reserves will be considered with caution and appropriately<br />
factored into out-year deficits.<br />
4. The district will continue to pursue additional revenue, costs savings<br />
and efficiencies; and will work to reduce investments into<br />
programming that hasn’t shown sufficient results.<br />
5. The budget will prioritize investments that are aligned with our<br />
Strategic Goals as outlined in the Strategic Plan:<br />
All students will perform at or above grade level.<br />
Achievement gaps among student groups will be<br />
eliminated.<br />
All students will graduate ready for college, career and life<br />
in a globally competitive economy.<br />
All schools will meet or exceed state accountability<br />
standards, and the district will meet federal standards and<br />
exceed state standards.<br />
6. We recognize the need to target resource investments into<br />
programming that supports achievement growth for all schools.<br />
Therefore any new budgetary investments will reflect the Strategic<br />
Priorities established by the Board.<br />
7. The performance results from the District’s Performance<br />
Management System which includes: the Districtwide Balanced<br />
Scorecard, Strategic Plan Monitoring tools, program evaluations,<br />
electronic dashboards, operational Key Performance Indicators<br />
(KPIs) and individual employee evaluations will be used to make<br />
budgetary decisions in an effort to establish a budget that is<br />
performance-driven and based on proven results.<br />
8. The budget process must be transparent and include sufficient<br />
opportunity for community engagement and feedback.<br />
9. The Board seeks to maintain competitive total compensation levels<br />
for all classes of employees and will consider such<br />
recommendations as long as they are sustainable.<br />
10. <strong>Budget</strong>ed assumptions for staffing ratios must meet State standards<br />
unless a waiver is sought from the State.<br />
11. The budget should be developed in a multi-year framework<br />
(minimum three years) to account for out-year implications of<br />
budget proposals and revenue estimates.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 110
Strategic Plan Framework<br />
In December 2009, the Board of Trustees approved the A<strong>ISD</strong> Strategic Plan for FY2010-2015. With<br />
limited resources, A<strong>ISD</strong> must remain focused on the goals and strategies that will best prepare all<br />
students for college, career and life in a globally competitive environment. This plan was reviewed and<br />
revised in January 2012.<br />
Mission<br />
WHAT WE DO<br />
In partnership with parents and our community,<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> exists to provide a comprehensive<br />
educational experience that is high quality,<br />
challenging, and inspires all students to<br />
make a positive contribution to society.<br />
Vision<br />
WHERE WE WANT TO BE<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> will be nationally recognized as an<br />
outstanding school district, instilling a passion<br />
for life-long learning in all students.<br />
Values<br />
WHAT WE BELIEVE IN<br />
Focus on Children<br />
Excellence<br />
Integrity<br />
Equity<br />
Respect<br />
Health and Safety<br />
Goals<br />
WHAT WE WANT TO ACCOMPLISH<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
All students will perform at or above grade<br />
level.<br />
Achievement gaps among all student<br />
groups will be eliminated.<br />
All students will graduate ready for college,<br />
career and life in a globally competitive<br />
economy.<br />
All schools will meet or exceed state<br />
accountability standards, and the district<br />
will meet federal standards and exceed<br />
state standards.<br />
Strategies<br />
HOW WE WILL ACHIEVE OUR GOALS<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Provide a high-quality, well-rounded<br />
educational experience to all students that is<br />
rigorous, culturally relevant, healthful and<br />
engaging.<br />
Build strong relationships with students,<br />
families, and the community to increase trust<br />
and shared responsibility.<br />
Ensure that every classroom has a highquality,<br />
effective educator, supported by<br />
high-quality, effective administrators and<br />
support staff.<br />
Align resources to accomplish priorities<br />
within a balanced budget.<br />
Measurable Outcomes<br />
HOW WE WILL CHECK<br />
PROGRESS ON OUR GOALS<br />
1. Results of standardized testing<br />
2. Achievement gaps among student groups<br />
3. Graduation rates<br />
4. College readiness<br />
5. Postsecondary enrollment<br />
6. Enrollment in Advanced Placement (AP)<br />
courses<br />
7. Performance in AP courses<br />
8. Additional measures related to readiness for<br />
college, career, and life in a globally<br />
competitive economy<br />
9. District and accountability ratings<br />
10. Attendance rates<br />
11. Four-year completion rates<br />
12. Annual dropout rates<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 111
<strong>Budget</strong> Development Process<br />
The budgeting process is comprised of three<br />
major phases: planning, preparation and<br />
evaluation.<br />
During the planning stage, the district’s goals and<br />
objectives are reviewed, evaluated and modified if<br />
necessary to make sure they are congruent to the<br />
district’s overall mission. At this point, senior<br />
members of the Cabinet meet to discuss strategic<br />
planning issues, goals and initiatives for the<br />
coming year as well as challenges and<br />
opportunities facing the district. Fundamental<br />
projections in the tax base and changes in funding<br />
levels received are closely examined. Interaction<br />
with key stakeholders, including the Board of<br />
Trustees, principals, parents, and community<br />
involvement groups, district advisory committees,<br />
citizen budget review committees, employee<br />
organizations, and the public at-large, is<br />
encouraged as a means to understand their<br />
priorities, needs, and concerns, and at the same<br />
time to inform them about the issues affecting the<br />
district, including available resources. Staff begins<br />
with the previous year’s budget calendar and<br />
modifies it for use in the current year. The<br />
calendar lists critical dates for preparation,<br />
submission, meetings with key stakeholders,<br />
committees, community and Board of Trustees to<br />
discuss the preliminary budget, public hearings<br />
and adoption. Presented in the next page is the<br />
budget calendar for the <strong>FY2013</strong> budget<br />
development process.<br />
The budget preparation process begins with the<br />
Board adopting budget parameters, budget<br />
assumptions, priorities, and staffing guidelines.<br />
The <strong>Budget</strong> Office staff holds budget workshops to<br />
discuss any changes in the coming year budget<br />
process and to distribute the budget package to<br />
schools and departments. Information on student<br />
enrollment, weighted pupil allocation, staffing and<br />
non-staffing allocations as well as supplemental<br />
allocations for special programs is included in the<br />
budget package. The basic premise for campus<br />
allocations is to give principals greater flexibility<br />
and control over resources while ensuring that the<br />
district’s funds flow to campuses according to<br />
their program needs and projected student<br />
enrollment. For departmental budgets,<br />
justifications are required for all non-salary<br />
budget requests. Food Service budgets are<br />
prepared by the Food Service Executive<br />
Director whereas the Debt Service budgets are<br />
prepared by the Executive Director of Finance.<br />
Capital Projects budgets are developed on a<br />
multi-year basis and are prepared by the<br />
Construction Management department.<br />
Review of the campus budgets takes place first<br />
with the Campus Advisory Committees. The<br />
campus budgets are then sent to the Associate<br />
Superintendents for their review and approval<br />
before being forwarded to the <strong>Budget</strong> Office for<br />
processing. Departmental budgets require an<br />
approval signature of their area chief. The<br />
district Senior Cabinet reviews all budget<br />
increases, requests, and instructs the <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Office to process only those that are<br />
recommended by them. The Chief Finance<br />
Officer and/or the Superintendent present the<br />
preliminary budget to the Citizen’s <strong>Budget</strong> Task<br />
Force, community and Board of Trustees.<br />
Several informational meetings are held within<br />
the community and public hearings are<br />
conducted in April and June. The recommended<br />
budgets are approved in mid to late June.<br />
The budget is evaluated for its effectiveness in<br />
attaining goals and objectives. Evaluation<br />
typically involves an examination of how funds<br />
were expended, what outcomes resulted from<br />
the expenditure of funds, and to what degree<br />
these outcomes achieved the objectives stated<br />
during the planning phase. The evaluation<br />
phase is important in determining the following<br />
year’s budgetary allocations.<br />
In summary, budget preparation is not a onetime<br />
exercise to determine how a school district<br />
will allocate funds. Rather, school district budget<br />
preparation is part of a continuous cycle of<br />
planning and evaluation to achieve district<br />
goals.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 112
Table 49<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> Development Process<br />
Sept 2011 Board <strong>Budget</strong> Parameters Adopted April 2012 Community Conversation on<br />
the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Oct 2011 Board Approves <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Calendar<br />
Staff Conversation on<br />
the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Nov 2011 Board Reviews Assumptions,<br />
Staffing Formulas, Enrollment<br />
Board Discussion on Preliminary<br />
Projections, Staffing Guidelines<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> and Rate<br />
and Fund Balance Condition<br />
Board Determines Strategic Plan<br />
Priorities<br />
Superintendent presents the<br />
Revised <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> based<br />
on Community & Board Feedback<br />
Board Action on Facilities Master<br />
Plan Framework<br />
Public Hearing on <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revised <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Dec 2011 Revised Financial Forecast for May 2012 Travis Central Appraisal District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong>-2015<br />
provides Preliminary Appraisal<br />
Values<br />
Board Action on Annual Facilities<br />
Recommendations June 2012 Superintendent presents the<br />
Recommended <strong>FY2013</strong> Expenditure<br />
Jan 2012 <strong>Budget</strong> Office Compiles <strong>Budget</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> to the Board, Public and<br />
Media<br />
Feb 2012 Superintendent presents the<br />
Preliminary <strong>FY2013</strong> to the Board,<br />
Board Conducts Public Hearing<br />
Public and Media<br />
on <strong>FY2013</strong> Recommended <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Mar 2012 Community Conversation on Board Approval of <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
the Preliminary <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Recommended Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong><br />
July 2012<br />
Travis Central Appraisal District<br />
Certifies Appraisal Values<br />
Aug 2012<br />
Board Conducts Public Hearing<br />
on Proposed <strong>Budget</strong> and Tax Rate<br />
Board Adopts the <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Budget</strong><br />
and <strong>FY2013</strong> Tax Rate<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 113
<strong>Budget</strong> Administration and Management Process<br />
The Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> provides authority to expend funds for the purpose indicated and in accordance with<br />
State law, Board policy, and the district’s approved purchasing procedures. The expenditure of funds<br />
shall be under the direction of the Superintendent or designee who shall ensure that funds are expended<br />
in accordance with the Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
The district installed an accounting system that meets the requirements prescribed by State Board of<br />
Education and conforms to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. A report of revenues and<br />
expenditures include management, cost accounting and financial information that enable management<br />
and staff to monitor the funding process and determine education costs by district, campus and program.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> monitoring is done not only by staff in the <strong>Budget</strong> Office, but also by the entire district’s<br />
administrators. The Chief Financial Officer and other district administrators use similar expenditure and<br />
encumbrance reports to monitor the budget compliance of programs and funds. Annualized budget<br />
summaries which project the impact of current expenditures on year-end results are useful in this effort.<br />
Reporting to Texas Education Agency (TEA)<br />
The A<strong>ISD</strong> budgets are submitted to TEA via the Public Education Information Management System<br />
(PEIMS) transmission process as of the date established in the annual instructions for the system. TEA<br />
monitors for compliance at the district level only. This monitoring is a legal requirement to ensure<br />
mandatory expenditure levels in certain areas. In addition, Amended <strong>Budget</strong>s are reflected on the<br />
schedule comparing budget and actual results in the annual financial and compliance audit report of<br />
which the district has met all requirements mandated by TEA.<br />
Amending the <strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong> amendment occurs when a change is made increasing any one of the functional spending<br />
categories or increasing revenue object accounts and other resources. The district prepares monthly<br />
financial reports to include all budget amendments for budgeted funds including General Fund, Food<br />
Service Fund, Debt Service Fund and the Capital Projects Fund. These budget changes are usually the<br />
result of unexpected levels of expenditures in certain categories and must be amended in the budget for<br />
legal compliance. All budget amendments in the monthly financial reports are prepared at fund and<br />
functional levels and required to be adopted by the last day of the fiscal year.<br />
All necessary budget amendments are formally adopted by the School Board and recorded in the Board<br />
Minutes.<br />
Purchasing<br />
The district’s Purchasing Department is responsible for all bids. All district contracts, except contracts for<br />
the purchase of produce or vehicle fuel, valued at $50,000 or more in the aggregate for each 12-month<br />
period, are made by the method that provides the best value for the district:<br />
Competitive bidding.<br />
Competitive sealed proposals.<br />
A request for proposals for services other than construction services.<br />
An inter-local contract.<br />
The reverse auction procedure as defined by Government Code 2155.062(d).<br />
The formation of a political subdivision corporation under Local Government Code 304.001.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 114
Purchasing (continued)<br />
For supplies, equipment and services costing less than $10,000 in the aggregate over a 12-month period,<br />
the district follows the following procedures:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Whenever available, needed items are requisitioned from the Materials Management Warehouse.<br />
Items that are not available from the Materials Management warehouse will be purchased<br />
through established supply agreements with outside vendors when possible.<br />
Purchases of items or services not available from the warehouse or established supply<br />
agreements, costing less than $1,000, are made in the most expeditious manner, based upon a<br />
single quote.<br />
Written quotations solicited by facsimile from at least three vendors, if possible, are secured for<br />
purchases of $1,000 or more, but less than $10,000. Each vendor is furnished with written<br />
specifications. Written quotes include freight costs, i.e., FOB destination, freight prepaid and<br />
allowed.<br />
When quotes cannot be obtained, sole source purchases will be documented. Items or services<br />
that are only available from one source are supported by written documentation and approved by<br />
an area chief.<br />
No commitment for goods or services (other than activity fund purchases) can be made without a<br />
valid purchase order being issued by the Purchasing Office.<br />
Purchases of $10,000 or more generally require formal bids and advertising. Purchases of this<br />
magnitude are made through the Purchasing Office.<br />
The district implemented a procurement cards (P-cards) system in September 2010.<br />
The Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> provides authority to expend funds for the purposes indicated and in accordance<br />
with State law, Board policy, and the district’s approved purchasing procedures. The expenditure of funds<br />
shall be under the direction of the Superintendent or his or her designee.<br />
Reporting to the Texas Education Agency (TEA)<br />
The district submits its Annual <strong>Budget</strong>, student attendance information, and its end-of-year financial<br />
status through a system called Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS). Transmission<br />
dates are established by TEA. The PEIMS system collects the same types of information from all Texas<br />
public schools, processes them and provides to end users a rich data base of information for benchmark<br />
comparison purposes and/or for any other statistical analysis research works.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 115
This Page Intentionally Left Blank<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 116
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
Financial<br />
Overview
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Financial Overview<br />
The Financial Section provides specific fiscal information regarding the various funds of the district. By law,<br />
the Board of Trustees must approve annual budgets for the General Fund, Food Service Funds, and Debt<br />
Service Fund. These three funds make up the Governmental Funds.<br />
A pyramid approach is used, starting with The Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for all<br />
Governmental Funds for the official budget year <strong>FY2013</strong> and for the five-year summary from FY2009<br />
through <strong>FY2013</strong>, followed with the presentation of individual funds.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 117
<strong>Budget</strong> Analysis<br />
The budget that the Board is required to take action on is comprised of the three primary funds, known as the<br />
Governmental Funds, which are the General Fund, Food Service Fund, and Debt Service Fund.<br />
Special Revenue Funds, Capital Project Funds and Proprietary Funds are provided for informational purposes<br />
only. Special Revenue Funds are approved separately by the Board of Trustees when final grant awards are<br />
made. Capital Projects Funds have been previously authorized through the bond election process.<br />
The district’s budget is organized in the following fund categories:<br />
General Fund<br />
Used to pay for salaries and benefits, classroom resources, keeping schools clean and landscapes<br />
maintained, transporting students, paying utility bills, providing clerical and administrative support – all the<br />
things a school needs when it opens its doors.<br />
Food Service Fund<br />
Used for the operation of the district’s food service program.<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
Used to pay off bonds previously approved by district voters or building construction and renovation.<br />
Special Revenue Fund (Grants)<br />
Used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources such as federal categorical, state or locally<br />
financed programs where unused balances are returned to the grant. These funds are tied to specific<br />
programmatic deliverables and expenditure restrictions.<br />
Proprietary Funds<br />
Proprietary funds focus on the determination of operating income, changes in net assets (or cost recovery),<br />
financial position and cash flows. Proprietary funds report an activity for which a fee is charge to external users<br />
for good or services. Internal service funds account for the financing of goods or services provided by one<br />
department or agency to other departments or agencies of the governmental unit, or to other governmental<br />
units, on a cost-reimbursable basis. Examples of the district’s proprietary funds include the employee health<br />
insurance fund, worker’s compensation fund, the print shop, laundry services, and the print shop.<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
The budget that the Board is required to take action on is comprised of the three primary funds, known as the<br />
Governmental Funds, which are the General Fund, Food Service Fund, and Debt Service Fund. The <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
total governmental expenditures are projected to be $979.5 million. The total revenues for these funds are<br />
approximately $950.5 million. The planned deficits will be covered with the fund balance reserves. Revenue is<br />
expected to decrease by $21.9 million or 2.25 percent and expenditures will increase by $5.2 million or 0.54<br />
percent over the prior year adopted budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 118
Table 50<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
FY2012<br />
Governmental<br />
Adopted Total<br />
General Fund<br />
Food<br />
Service Fund<br />
Debt<br />
Service Fund<br />
Revenues<br />
5700 Local Sources $742,072,311 $ 677,368,777 $ 8,392,715 $ 101,297,021 $ 787,058,513<br />
5800 State Sources 171,448,575 110,259,107 1,146,327 - 111,405,434<br />
5900 Federal Sources 58,916,699 20,386,584 30,675,778 984,466 52,046,828<br />
Combined Fund Revenue Total $972,437,585 $808,014,468 $40,214,820 $102,281,487 $950,510,775<br />
Expenditures<br />
11 Instruction $419,734,596 $ 432,107,452 $ - $ - $ 432,107,452<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Services 11,321,673 10,785,702 - - 10,785,702<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development 16,259,504 16,394,100 - - 16,394,100<br />
21 Instructional Administration 9,795,691 10,194,410 - - 10,194,410<br />
23 School Administration 46,812,796 47,911,053 - - 47,911,053<br />
31 Guidance & Counseling Services 18,726,353 19,694,749 - - 19,694,749<br />
32 Attendance & Social Work Services 2,970,687 2,906,651 - - 2,906,651<br />
33 Health Services 5,946,564 6,131,553 - - 6,131,553<br />
34 Pupil Transportation 24,488,580 27,109,548 - - 27,109,548<br />
35 Food Services 38,297,927 - 39,245,441 - 39,245,441<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities 13,262,821 13,376,167 - - 13,376,167<br />
41 General Administration 17,064,813 18,248,506 - - 18,248,506<br />
51 Plant Maintenance 78,925,932 79,012,294 1,551,835 - 80,564,129<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services 9,577,526 9,897,984 - - 9,897,984<br />
53 Data Processing Services 17,244,095 17,803,638 - - 17,803,638<br />
61 Community Services 4,426,066 4,627,381 - - 4,627,381<br />
71 Debt Services 96,967,282 877,565 - 102,744,114 103,621,679<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 1,320,000 1,320,000 - - 1,320,000<br />
91 Contracted Instructional Srvcs-Public Schools 135,176,524 111,739,859 - - 111,739,859<br />
93 Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 1,233,902 1,658,106 - - 1,658,106<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges 4,717,540 4,164,661 - - 4,164,661<br />
Combined Fund Expenditure Total $ 974,270,872 $ 835,961,379 $ 40,797,276 $ 102,744,114 $ 979,502,769<br />
Net Revenue Over (Under) $ (1,833,287) $ (27,946,911) $ (582,456) $ (462,627) $ (28,991,994)<br />
Other Sources (Uses)<br />
7900 Other Resources 51,000 51,000 - 51,000<br />
8900 Other Uses (81,000) (81,000) - (81,000)<br />
Net Sources Over (Under) $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ - $ - $ (30,000)<br />
Net Revenue/Sources Over (Under) $ (1,863,287) $ (27,976,911) $ (582,456) $ (462,627) $ (29,021,994)<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase orders and<br />
unspent balances at year end $ 30,064,925<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Total<br />
Beginning Fund Balance (Estimated) $ 249,470,708 $ 248,072,693 $ 8,760,016 $ 20,839,642 $ 277,672,346<br />
Ending Fund Balance (Estimated) 277,672,346 220,095,782 8,177,560 20,377,015 248,650,352<br />
Less Assigned Balance (48,983,942) (35,530,274) - - (35,530,274)<br />
Ending Funding Balance - Unassigned $ 228,688,404 $ 184,565,508 $ 8,177,560 $ 20,377,015 $ 213,120,078<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Expenditures 23% 22% 20% 20% 22%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 119
Table 51<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Taxes- Current Year Levy $ 697,204,001 $ 727,171,964 $ 724,397,554 $ 721,766,364 $ 764,035,890 $ 42,269,526 5.86%<br />
Taxes- Prior Years 3,447,783 3,712,168 4,795,397 3,525,000 4,861,915 1,336,915 37.93%<br />
Penalty & Interest 3,470,074 3,712,753 3,709,002 3,444,537 3,794,387 349,850 10.16%<br />
Tuition & Fees 800,677 658,611 692,699 700,000 1,570,955 870,955 124.42%<br />
Athletic Activities 634,287 678,995 729,294 640,900 743,880 102,980 16.07%<br />
Earnings from Investments 3,646,431 853,314 712,398 800,000 616,167 (183,833) -22.98%<br />
Gifts and Bequests 197,958 64,049 25,230 141,066 - (141,066) -100.00%<br />
Insurance Recovery 1,255,393 16,333 2,333,537 100,000 - (100,000) 0.00%<br />
Erate Reimbursement 379,544 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
Rent Revenues 784,573 938,128 1,157,557 1,014,768 1,014,768 - 0.00%<br />
School Lunches 8,052,659 7,778,220 7,602,802 8,148,083 8,314,262 166,179 2.04%<br />
Other Revenues -Local Sources 1,842,795 2,510,922 3,123,877 1,791,593 2,106,289 314,696 17.57%<br />
TOTAL 721,716,175 748,095,457 749,279,347 742,072,311 787,058,513 44,986,202 6.06%<br />
STATE REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Per Capita Apportionment 19,252,679 9,075,326 25,432,653 19,081,728 47,073,537 27,991,809 146.69%<br />
Foundation School Program 167,662,657 89,130,638 109,384,215 121,088,928 33,053,978 (88,034,950) -72.70%<br />
Prior Year State Rev Adjustments 201,806 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
Other State Revenue 76,396 257,107 242,268 100,000 - (100,000) -100.00%<br />
State Program Revenue 243,818 385,537 409,626 247,313 347,313 100,000 40.43%<br />
TRS on Behalf (Book Entry Only) 29,821,337 28,234,541 28,335,185 30,930,606 30,930,606 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 217,258,693 127,083,149 163,803,947 171,448,575 111,405,434 (60,043,141) -35.02%<br />
FEDERAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Federal Indirect Costs 1,746,954 2,224,404 2,310,644 1,600,000 2,163,595 563,595 35.22%<br />
State Stabilization Funds - 22,187,440 24,280,941 - - - 0.00%<br />
Federal Revenue Through TEA 242,235 256,426 244,110 13,985,672 199,000 (13,786,672) -98.58%<br />
School Breakfast Program 5,336,244 5,713,018 6,021,014 5,916,389 6,093,881 177,492 3.00%<br />
National School Lunch Program 19,507,701 21,029,117 21,607,380 21,628,537 22,277,393 648,856 3.00%<br />
USDA Donated Commodities 1,164,566 1,226,842 1,736,715 1,226,842 1,245,245 18,403 1.50%<br />
After School Snack Program 389,982 369,913 245,275 389,982 389,982 - 0.00%<br />
Other Federal Revenues 669,276 524,050 - 669,277 669,277 - 0.00%<br />
Building America Bond Subsidy - - 886,020 - 984,466 984,466 0.00%<br />
School Health & Related Services 1,300,610 13,551,585 15,596,597 13,500,000 18,023,989 4,523,989 33.51%<br />
TOTAL 30,357,568 67,082,795 72,928,696 58,916,699 52,046,828 (6,869,871) -11.66%<br />
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REV TOTAL $ 969,332,436 $ 942,261,401 $ 986,011,990 $ 972,437,585 $ 950,510,775 $ (21,926,810) -2.25%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 120
Table 51 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
11 Instruction<br />
Payroll Costs 374,167,504<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
$ $ 385,805,005 $ 386,873,807 $ 407,741,402 $ 412,159,712 $ 4,418,310 1.08%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 3,020,317 2,875,426 3,071,985 3,014,320 8,593,458 5,579,138 185.09%<br />
Supplies & Materials 8,303,621 7,699,780 8,061,160 8,240,693 10,397,545 2,156,852 26.17%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 1,315,981 1,035,337 920,431 738,181 956,737 218,556 29.61%<br />
Capital Outlay 213,294 135,475 373,993 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 387,020,717 397,551,023 399,301,376 419,734,596 432,107,452 12,372,856 2.95%<br />
12 Instructional Resource & Media<br />
Payroll Costs 10,919,363 11,106,268 10,664,810 9,942,010 9,421,612 (520,398) -5.23%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 181,602 250,866 205,514 226,638 229,166 2,528 1.12%<br />
Supplies & Materials 3,274,943 1,252,666 1,264,160 1,073,832 1,054,537 (19,295) -1.80%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 89,952 36,406 20,530 32,193 33,387 1,194 3.71%<br />
Capital Outlay 108,627 6,025 93,739 47,000 47,000 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 14,574,487 12,652,231 12,248,753 11,321,673 10,785,702 (535,971) -4.73%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development<br />
Payroll Costs 11,297,458 13,727,720 12,134,669 14,358,628 14,284,725 (73,903) -0.51%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 1,176,021 1,339,679 600,834 668,139 648,310 (19,829) -2.97%<br />
Supplies & Materials 748,757 887,611 663,275 791,473 876,258 84,785 10.71%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 1,465,275 1,040,989 912,194 441,264 584,807 143,543 32.53%<br />
Capital Outlay 5,130 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 14,692,641 16,995,999 14,310,972 16,259,504 16,394,100 134,596 0.83%<br />
21 Instructional Administration<br />
Payroll Costs 8,906,728 8,941,999 8,105,239 7,507,017 7,882,898 375,881 5.01%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 1,081,081 1,058,876 969,223 1,318,573 1,321,525 2,952 0.22%<br />
Supplies & Materials 664,811 545,627 443,985 865,774 871,140 5,366 0.62%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 372,187 233,926 155,486 104,327 118,847 14,520 13.92%<br />
Capital Outlay 16,769 19,800 - - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 11,041,576 10,800,228 9,673,933 9,795,691 10,194,410 398,719 4.07%<br />
23 School Administration<br />
Payroll Costs 44,727,831 45,941,750 46,292,718 46,379,903 47,479,076 1,099,173 2.37%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 131,659 160,446 181,774 148,176 127,035 (21,141) -14.27%<br />
Supplies & Materials 510,349 450,057 402,387 232,380 234,847 2,467 1.06%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 96,805 82,344 94,704 52,337 70,095 17,758 33.93%<br />
TOTAL 45,466,644 46,634,597 46,971,583 46,812,796 47,911,053 1,098,257 2.35%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 121
Table 51 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
31 Guidance and Counseling<br />
Payroll Costs 16,965,762 17,816,842 18,298,872 17,415,427 18,121,447 706,020 4.05%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 489,575 388,775 328,428 614,371 665,571 51,200 8.33%<br />
Supplies & Materials 857,753 754,454 690,825 657,171 851,908 194,737 29.63%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 108,242 94,788 92,642 39,384 55,823 16,439 41.74%<br />
Capital Outlay - - 6,676 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 18,421,332 19,054,859 19,417,443 18,726,353 19,694,749 968,396 5.17%<br />
32 Social Services<br />
Payroll Costs 2,543,099 2,661,990 2,982,912 2,638,146 2,573,625 (64,521) -2.45%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 140,250 210,998 34,103 303,792 303,792 - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials 25,786 15,381 10,965 18,687 19,172 485 2.60%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 30,498 5,517 12,816 10,062 10,062 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 2,739,633 2,893,886 3,040,796 2,970,687 2,906,651 (64,036) -2.16%<br />
33 Health Services<br />
Payroll Costs 526,125 530,352 554,950 537,452 550,391 12,939 2.41%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 4,825,064 4,586,578 5,149,995 5,367,312 5,539,412 172,100 3.21%<br />
Supplies & Materials 17,671 12,553 37,894 41,800 41,750 (50) -0.12%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 3,677 2,710 1,729 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 5,372,537 5,132,193 5,744,568 5,946,564 6,131,553 184,989 3.11%<br />
34 Student Transportation<br />
Payroll Costs 22,836,996 23,495,865 23,595,642 21,951,643 23,664,728 1,713,085 7.80%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 1,132,216 249,953 211,716 206,500 209,500 3,000 1.45%<br />
Supplies & Materials 2,432,793 2,701,825 3,535,235 3,178,417 4,117,600 939,183 29.55%<br />
Other Operating Expenses (835,744) (973,414) (1,037,878) (847,980) (882,280) (34,300) 4.04%<br />
Capital Outlay 8,995 - 107,050 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 25,575,256 25,474,229 26,411,765 24,488,580 27,109,548 2,620,968 10.70%<br />
35 Food Services<br />
Payroll Costs 20,908,710 20,998,757 21,816,949 22,297,646 22,828,349 530,703 2.38%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 588,127 530,913 626,809 730,997 730,997 - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials 13,663,689 14,195,612 14,658,407 15,185,107 15,601,918 416,811 2.74%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 9,580 10,180 12,709 21,566 21,566 - 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay 460,349 351,649 550,892 62,611 62,611 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 35,630,455 36,087,111 37,665,766 38,297,927 39,245,441 947,514 2.47%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 122
Table 51 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities<br />
Payroll Costs 9,931,624 10,825,419 10,786,996 10,281,910 10,355,084 73,174 0.71%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 1,029,038 1,136,495 1,124,819 920,262 1,074,350 154,088 16.74%<br />
Supplies & Materials 1,090,240 1,109,453 1,062,674 971,686 872,475 (99,211) -10.21%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 1,394,785 1,403,577 1,519,669 1,088,963 1,074,258 (14,705) -1.35%<br />
Capital Outlay 210,608 129,153 38,001 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 13,656,295 14,604,097 14,532,159 13,262,821 13,376,167 113,346 0.85%<br />
41 General Administration<br />
Payroll Costs 14,029,715 13,403,330 13,572,186 13,975,151 14,463,666 488,515 3.50%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 2,789,709 2,317,454 2,059,670 1,664,221 1,959,841 295,620 17.76%<br />
Supplies & Materials 446,032 541,993 485,387 545,516 555,442 9,926 1.82%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 1,059,930 861,772 409,400 879,925 1,269,557 389,632 44.28%<br />
Capital Outlay - - 6,240 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 18,325,386 17,124,549 16,532,883 17,064,813 18,248,506 1,183,693 6.94%<br />
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations<br />
Payroll Costs 42,625,397 41,690,215 40,510,744 41,153,819 42,462,295 1,308,476 3.18%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 32,714,798 31,984,050 32,050,898 32,242,404 32,507,975 265,571 0.82%<br />
Supplies & Materials 4,554,787 4,609,972 4,352,458 3,742,156 3,828,804 86,648 2.32%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 1,739,835 2,233,347 1,639,474 1,729,553 1,707,055 (22,498) -1.30%<br />
Capital Outlay 139,366 452,752 38,199 58,000 58,000 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 81,774,183 80,970,336 78,591,773 78,925,932 80,564,129 1,638,197 2.08%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Serviees<br />
Payroll Costs 8,573,494 8,863,239 8,417,648 9,029,501 9,348,958 319,457 3.54%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 78,276 65,255 70,224 87,858 88,358 500 0.57%<br />
Supplies & Materials 537,353 446,139 403,500 402,607 403,107 500 0.12%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 110,415 71,607 84,900 50,325 50,326 1 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay 315,767 20,725 52,307 7,235 7,235 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 9,615,305 9,466,965 9,028,579 9,577,526 9,897,984 320,458 3.35%<br />
53 Data Proccessing Services<br />
Payroll Costs 10,739,629 10,837,656 10,431,465 11,078,514 11,638,057 559,543 5.05%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 3,623,466 3,082,208 2,848,895 2,859,366 2,859,366 - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials 4,108,525 3,580,927 4,809,026 3,255,056 3,255,056 - 0.00%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 172,542 80,618 56,037 26,159 26,159 - 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay 172,231 259,607 353,084 25,000 25,000 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 18,816,393 17,841,016 18,498,507 17,244,095 17,803,638 559,543 3.24%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 123
Table 51 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
61 Community Services<br />
Payroll Costs 4,876,332 4,704,715 4,512,651 3,447,906 3,610,771 162,865 4.72%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 803,969 767,233 732,000 901,015 931,015 30,000 3.33%<br />
Supplies & Materials 59,556 70,721 91,709 68,535 68,635 100 0.15%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 146,899 62,470 53,532 8,610 16,960 8,350 96.98%<br />
TOTAL 5,886,756 5,605,139 5,389,892 4,426,066 4,627,381 201,315 4.55%<br />
71 Debt Service<br />
Bond Principal 37,452,633 45,112,633 52,617,633 58,697,347 50,898,305 (7,799,042) -13.29%<br />
Bond Interest 32,352,780 34,671,258 35,122,926 36,148,032 50,770,809 14,622,777 40.45%<br />
Debt Service - General Fund 1,122,270 1,129,300 1,129,400 1,046,903 877,565 (169,338) -16.18%<br />
Other Debt Serv Fees 236,725 418,768 893,547 1,075,000 1,075,000 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 71,164,408 81,331,959 89,763,506 96,967,282 103,621,679 6,654,397 6.86%<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
Payroll Costs - - 3,512 - - - 0.00%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 579,618 610,402 604,301 1,320,000 1,320,000 - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials 26,768 26,501 26,501 - - - 0.00%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 31,388 22,989 9,419 - - - 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay 4,576,987 1,868,125 1,457,723 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 5,214,761 2,528,017 2,101,456 1,320,000 1,320,000 - 0.00%<br />
91 Contracted Srvcs Between Public Schools<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 177,664,513 111,937,679 123,774,675 135,176,524 111,739,859 (23,436,665) -17.34%<br />
TOTAL 177,664,513 111,937,679 123,774,675 135,176,524 111,739,859 (23,436,665) -17.34%<br />
93 Payments For Shared Svcs<br />
Other Operating Expenses 1,244,061 1,700,441 1,658,106 1,233,902 1,658,106 424,204 34.38%<br />
TOTAL 1,244,061 1,700,441 1,658,106 1,233,902 1,658,106 424,204 34.38%<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 3,843,994 3,953,241 4,150,819 4,717,540 4,164,661 (552,879) -11.72%<br />
TOTAL 3,843,994 3,953,241 4,150,819 4,717,540 4,164,661 (552,879) -11.72%<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 967,741,333 920,339,795 938,809,312 974,270,872 979,502,769 5,231,897 0.53%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 124
Table 51 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
All Governmental Funds<br />
Combined Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease) Over<br />
Prior Year<br />
OTHER SOURCES<br />
Loan Proceeds 64,129 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
Premium/Discount on Bonds - 1,135,854 - - - - 0.00%<br />
Prepaid Interest 448,268 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
Sale of Bonds - 9,587,996 - - - - 0.00%<br />
Operating Transfer In 1,394,910 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
Sale of Real Property - 196,725 80,025 51,000 51,000 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 1,907,307 10,920,575 80,025 51,000 51,000 - 0.00%<br />
OTHER USES<br />
Legal Settlement 217,284 109,050 54,896 81,000 81,000 - 0.00%<br />
Other Uses - Debt Service Fund - 10,611,457 - - - - 0.00%<br />
Operating Transfer Out 5,054,461 - 48,182 - - - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 5,271,745 10,720,507 103,078 81,000 81,000 - 0.00%<br />
NET REVENUE/SOURCES OVER (UNDER) OVER<br />
(3,364,438) 200,068 (23,053) (30,000) (30,000) - 0.00%<br />
(UNDER)<br />
(1,773,335) 22,121,674 47,179,625 (1,863,287) (29,021,994) (27,158,707) 1457.57%<br />
ESTIMATED OUTSTANDING PURCHASE<br />
ORDERS AND UNSPENT BALANCES AT<br />
YEAR END<br />
30,064,925<br />
FUNDING BALANCES-SEPT 1 (BEGINNING) 181,942,744 180,169,409 202,291,083 249,470,708 277,672,346 28,201,638 11.30%<br />
FUNDING BALANCES-AUG 31 (ENDING) 180,169,409 202,291,083 249,470,708 277,672,346 248,650,352 (29,021,994) -10.45%<br />
LESS ASSIGNED BALANCE (25,279,819) (23,808,573) (39,038,247) (48,983,942) (35,530,274) 13,453,668 -27.47%<br />
ENDING FUND BALANCE - UNASSIGNED $ 154,889,590 $ 178,482,510 $ 210,432,461 $ 228,688,404 $ 213,120,078 $ (15,568,326) -6.81%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Expenditures<br />
16% 19% 22% 23% 22%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 125
As illustrated in the following table, the General Fund accounts for 85 percent of Governmental Fund<br />
revenues and 85 percent of total Governmental Fund expenditures for <strong>FY2013</strong>. The Debt Service Fund<br />
accounts for 11 percent of the revenues and 11 percent of the expenditures and the Food Services fund<br />
accounts for 4 percent of total revenues and expenditures. The majority of General and Debt Service<br />
Fund revenues are generated through local tax collections.<br />
Table 52<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
Revenue and Expenditure Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Governmental Funds Revenue <strong>Budget</strong><br />
General Fund<br />
$808,014,468<br />
85%<br />
Food Service<br />
Fund<br />
$40,214,820<br />
4%<br />
Debt Service<br />
Fund<br />
$102,281,487<br />
11%<br />
Governmental Funds Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong><br />
General Fund<br />
$835,961,379<br />
85%<br />
Food Service<br />
Fund<br />
$40,797,276<br />
4%<br />
Debt Service<br />
Fund<br />
$102,744,114<br />
11%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 126
These tables do not isolate the $111.7 million Chapter 41 payment the district must pay to the state. As<br />
illustrated in the below table, when Recapture is taken into consideration, the General Fund still<br />
constitutes the largest portion of the Governmental Funds representing $724.2 million or 74 percent of the<br />
share. Recapture, or Chapter 41, constitutes the next largest share at $111.7 million or 11 percent. The<br />
Debt Service Fund represents 11 percent and the Food Service Fund represents 4 percent of the<br />
Governmental Funds.<br />
Table 53<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> for Three Primary Funds and Recapture<br />
General Fund<br />
724,221,520<br />
74%<br />
Food Service<br />
40,797,276<br />
4%<br />
Debt Service<br />
102,744,114<br />
11%<br />
Chapter 41<br />
111,739,859<br />
11%<br />
What is Recapture?<br />
Recapture, which represents 11 percent of the district’s Governmental Funds, is a function of Chapter 41<br />
of the Texas Education Code which equalizes wealth for educational spending. The Chapter 41 provision<br />
is intended to “Recapture” local tax dollars from “property-rich” districts and redistribute the funds to<br />
“property-poor” districts. Under this law, golden pennies represent the six cents that property-rich school<br />
districts like A<strong>ISD</strong> are allowed to retain in revenue above the one-dollar tax that is assessed on all taxable<br />
property values. Any revenue collected on property taxes above these six cents is subject to Recapture<br />
by the state. In other words, in FY2012, nearly 45.3 percent of the revenue generated beyond the 6 cents<br />
is sent to the state for redistribution to property-poor school districts. In FY2012, nearly one fifth or 20<br />
percent of all local revenue collected from property taxes is subject to recapture. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the district<br />
projects a slight reduction in recapture; approximately 16.7 percent of all local revenue collected will be<br />
subject to Recapture and 43 percent of the revenue generated beyond the 6 cents will be subject to<br />
Recapture.<br />
It is projected that <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will submit $111.7 million to the state in Recapture funds for <strong>FY2013</strong>. This<br />
amount represents a decrease of approximately $23.5 million as compared to the FY2012 Recapture<br />
payments of $135.2 million. Over the past ten years, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> has paid the State of Texas almost $1.4<br />
billion in Recapture payments.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 127
Table 54<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Recapture Payments Compared to General Fund Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Ten Years<br />
$1,000,000,000<br />
$800,000,000<br />
$600,000,000<br />
$400,000,000<br />
$200,000,000<br />
$0<br />
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Total GF <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Chapter 41 Payments<br />
General Fund<br />
General Fund: Where the Money Comes From<br />
Out of the funds that A<strong>ISD</strong> manages, the largest is the General Fund. A<strong>ISD</strong>’s General Fund is used to<br />
support the operation of the school system and is comprised of three major sources: local, state, and<br />
federal. The General Fund is commonly referred to as the “Operating Fund” or “Local Maintenance<br />
Fund”. State aid and local property tax revenue are major sources of revenues for this fund.<br />
Local Funding<br />
Local funding consists of property taxes for the current year or prior years, investment earnings, athletic<br />
activities revenue, insurance recovery, grants, and school bonds. Local revenue accounts for $677.4<br />
million or 83.8 percent of all available sources of funding for the <strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund budget. Of this<br />
amount, the largest source of revenue is $671.6 million in local property taxes, which is derived from the<br />
current and delinquent property tax payments. The <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> predicts a 6.1 percent<br />
increase in total local revenue sources as compared to the prior year FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
State Funding<br />
State funding is based on a complex formula, determined by the legislature, which considers the number<br />
of students served, and is based on poverty levels, attendance rates, special programs, bilingual factors,<br />
taxable property wealth, and other factors. State revenue accounts for $110.3 million, or 13.6 percent of<br />
the total revenues of the General Fund budget. State funding will decrease by $60 million, or 35.3 percent<br />
from the prior FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. Of the $110.3 million in state revenue, approximately $30 million<br />
are TRS on behalf payments, which are not part of the state funding formula. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will<br />
actually pay more to the state than it will receive in state aid due to the changes in the school funding<br />
formula passed by the previous legislature.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 128
Table 55<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
State Funding Sources<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data from Prior Year<br />
Revenue Source<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% of <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Revenue $ Change % Change<br />
State Revenue $ 170,302,248 $ 110,259,107 100.00% $ (60,043,141) -35.26%<br />
Less:<br />
Recapture (135,176,524) (111,739,859) 101.3% 23,436,665 -17.34%<br />
TRS On Behalf Payments (30,031,592) (30,031,592) 27.2% - 0.00%<br />
Net State Operating Revenue $ 5,094,132 $ (31,512,344) -28.58% $ (36,606,476) -718.6%<br />
Federal Funding<br />
Federal funding, reflected in the General Fund, constitutes earnings from indirect cost from federal grant<br />
expenditures, and revenues received for school health and related services (SHARS), a Medicaid<br />
reimbursement program. The district has limited flexibility in how it spends federal revenue (and a portion<br />
of state revenue). Federal sources account for $20.4 million or 2.5 percent of the total revenue of the<br />
General Fund budget. The largest source of federal funding is the School Health and Related Services<br />
program, which represents $18 million. The district will not receive any additional funding in <strong>FY2013</strong> from<br />
the one year Edujobs Grant, which provided $13.8 million in federal revenue in FY2012. Federal revenue<br />
is estimated to decrease by $8.7 million or 29.9 percent from the prior year adopted budget as a result of<br />
this loss.<br />
Table 56<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Revenue Sources<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data from Prior Year<br />
Revenue Source<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% of <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Revenue $ Change % Change<br />
Local Revenue $ 638,484,837 $ 677,368,777 83.8% $ 38,883,940 6.1%<br />
State Revenue 170,302,248 110,259,107 13.6% (60,043,141) -35.3%<br />
Federal Revenue 29,085,672 20,386,584 2.5% (8,699,088) -29.9%<br />
Total 837,872,757 808,014,468 100.0% (29,858,289) -3.6%<br />
Less: Recapture 135,176,524 111,739,859 13.8% (23,436,665) -17.3%<br />
Operating Revenue $ 702,696,233 $ 696,274,609 86.2% $ (6,421,624) -0.9%<br />
As discussed above, the vast majority of the district’s funds come from local sources mainly derived from<br />
local tax collections.<br />
The following table depicts actual revenue received and forecasted revenue for local, state, and federal<br />
sources. Although A<strong>ISD</strong> enrollment has risen steadily in the past and is projected to continue, there has<br />
not been a direct correlation in student growth and revenue growth. Both local revenue and state aid have<br />
fluctuated up and down historically.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 129
$000 Millions<br />
$1,000<br />
Table 57<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Historical Comparison of Revenue Sources<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data from Prior Year<br />
$900<br />
$800<br />
$771<br />
$873 $877<br />
$860<br />
$807<br />
$834 $838<br />
$808<br />
$834<br />
$849<br />
$700<br />
$640 $651<br />
$600<br />
$500<br />
$400<br />
$300<br />
$200<br />
$100<br />
$-<br />
FY2004<br />
Actual<br />
FY2005<br />
Actual<br />
FY2006<br />
Actual<br />
FY2007<br />
Actual<br />
FY2008<br />
Actual<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
FY2014<br />
Forecast<br />
FY2015<br />
Forecast<br />
Total $639.52 $650.83 $770.95 $873.28 $877.34 $860.38 $807.26 $833.94 $837.87 $808.01 $833.50 $849.08<br />
5700 Local $582.68 $590.84 $685.60 $729.37 $642.51 $640.98 $664.83 $653.11 $638.48 $677.37 $691.61 $706.16<br />
5800 State $54.53 $57.42 $58.16 $118.58 $207.52 $216.15 $126.02 $162.68 $170.30 $110.26 $120.82 $121.16<br />
5900 Federal $2.32 $2.56 $27.20 $25.33 $27.31 $3.24 $16.41 $18.15 $29.09 $20.39 $21.08 $21.76<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 130
Where the Money Goes<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> continues to ensure that resources are spent primarily on support for schools and students.<br />
Approximately 59.7 percent of the General Fund revenue is allocated directly towards instruction (shown<br />
below). A significant portion of A<strong>ISD</strong>’s budget is also spent on maintenance and facilities. General<br />
Administration represents just 2.5 percent of the General Fund budget.<br />
Table 58<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted Operations <strong>Budget</strong> by Functional Area (General Fund)<br />
Chapter 41 Excluded<br />
Functional Area<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> % of <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Instruction 432,107,452 59.7%<br />
Instructional Resources & Media Services 10,785,702 1.5%<br />
Curriculum & Staff Development 16,394,100 2.3%<br />
Instructional Administration 10,194,410 1.4%<br />
School Administration 47,911,053 6.6%<br />
Guidance & Counseling Services 19,694,749 2.7%<br />
Attendance & Social Work Services 2,906,651 0.4%<br />
Health Services 6,131,553 0.8%<br />
Pupil Transportation 27,109,548 3.7%<br />
Co-Curricular Activities 13,376,167 1.8%<br />
Subtotal Instruction and Student Support 586,611,385 81.0%<br />
General Administration 18,248,506 2.5%<br />
Community Services 4,627,381 0.6%<br />
Subtotal Central & Community Services 22,875,887 3.2%<br />
Plant Maintenance 79,012,294 10.9%<br />
Security & Monitoring Services 9,897,984 1.4%<br />
Data Processing Services 17,803,638 2.5%<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction 1,320,000 0.2%<br />
Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 1,658,106 0.2%<br />
Debt Services 877,565 0.1%<br />
Other Intergovernmental Charges 4,164,661 0.6%<br />
Subtotal Operations & Infrastructure 114,734,248 15.8%<br />
Grand Total 724,221,520 100.0%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 131
Table 59<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> by Functional Area (General Fund)<br />
General<br />
Administration<br />
2.5%<br />
Guidance &<br />
Counseling<br />
Services 2.7%<br />
Data Processing<br />
Services 2.5%<br />
Curriculum & Staff<br />
Development<br />
2.3%<br />
Pupil<br />
Transportation<br />
3.7%<br />
School<br />
Administration<br />
6.6%<br />
Plant<br />
Maintenance<br />
10.9%<br />
Instruction<br />
59.7%<br />
Instruction<br />
School Administration<br />
Guidance & Counseling Services<br />
Data Processing Services<br />
Co-Curricular Activities<br />
Instructional Administration<br />
Health Services<br />
Other Intergovernmental Charges<br />
Payments-Shared Services Arrangements<br />
Debt Services<br />
Plant Maintenance<br />
Pupil Transportation<br />
General Administration<br />
Curriculum & Staff Development<br />
Instructional Resources & Media Services<br />
Security & Monitoring Services<br />
Community Services<br />
Attendance & Social Work Services<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 132
Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions<br />
For the General Fund<br />
The district employs a number of revenue forecasting methods. State aid and local property taxes are<br />
integrally joined to the biennial state budget process. The taxable property value for the <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> is projected to increase approximately 3.93 percent as compared to the FY2012<br />
net taxable value. Annual enrollment has historically grown by approximately 1 percent over the past<br />
six years.<br />
Revenue Assumptions<br />
Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) superseded House Bill 3646 (HB 3646) for the purpose of calculating state<br />
aid beginning in FY2012. Target revenue was reduced under SB 1, and WADA will be calculated<br />
at a lower amount than what was provided under HB 3646.<br />
Taxable Property – Certified property values are projected to increase 3.93 percent from FY2012<br />
to <strong>FY2013</strong> using the preliminary values released in July 2012.<br />
Tax Collection Rate – Collection rate of 99 percent is used to determine the <strong>FY2013</strong> local tax<br />
levy.<br />
Tax Rate – The tax rate for M&O will be maintained at $1.079 and the tax rate for I&S will be<br />
maintained at $0.163 per hundred dollars of assessed value.<br />
In FY2012, the revenue per WADA used to calculate the district’s entitlement funding was<br />
significantly reduced to a rate of $6,101 per WADA and will further decrease to $5,633 in <strong>FY2013</strong>,<br />
to effectively reduce the entitlement by additional $20 million in the second year of the biennium.<br />
Local Option – Due to minimal financial impact to the district, the budget projection maintains the<br />
local over 65 exemption of $25,000, in addition to the state required exemption of $10,000.<br />
Disabled Exemption – Due to minimal financial impact to the district, the budget projection<br />
maintains the local disabled exemption of $15,000, in addition to the state required $10,000.<br />
Historical Designated Property Exemption - Amends the A<strong>ISD</strong> historic property tax exemption<br />
program with recent program modifications approved by the <strong>Austin</strong> City Council to effectively cap<br />
the historic exemption at $3,500 for properties that are designated or change owners after<br />
December 31, 2011.<br />
Expenditure Assumptions<br />
Alignment with Strategic Plan and <strong>FY2013</strong> Board approved Goals and Priorities.<br />
Implement major budget reductions for the FY2012 and <strong>FY2013</strong> biennium as a result of the<br />
state’s $4 billion funding reduction in the 2011 Texas Legislature.<br />
Campus non-staff allocations per student: $71 for high schools, $64 for middle/junior high and<br />
$59 for elementary schools.<br />
Staff campus instructional programs commensurate with enrollment projections.<br />
Assume an enrollment increase of 612 students from FY2012 to <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
The one year $13.8 million Education Jobs federal grant distributed through the TEA will be<br />
discontinued for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year.<br />
Increase budget for the costs associated with opening Uphaus Early Childhood Center in August<br />
2012, and other initiatives to support the Mission Critical Strategic Plan.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 133
Purpose of General Fund<br />
The General Fund is used to account for all financial<br />
resources except those required to be accounted for<br />
in another fund.<br />
Revenue<br />
Total revenue is estimated to decrease $29.9 million<br />
from the prior year adopted budget.<br />
Local Revenue<br />
Local revenue accounts for $677.4 million or 83.8<br />
percent of all available sources of funding for the<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund <strong>Budget</strong>. Of this amount, the<br />
largest source of revenue is $671.6 million in local<br />
property tax, which is derived from the current and<br />
delinquent property tax payments.<br />
The adopted budget shows a 6.1 percent increase in<br />
total local sources as compared to the prior year<br />
adopted budget. This increase is attributed to higher<br />
certified property valuations, increased rent<br />
revenues, and other miscellaneous revenue.<br />
State Revenue<br />
State revenue accounts for $110.3 million or 13.6<br />
percent of the total revenues of the General Fund<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>. State Revenue is projected to decrease<br />
more than $60 million when compared to the prior<br />
year budget. Unfortunately, reductions are expected<br />
to continue even beyond the biennium. The 82nd<br />
Legislature has expressed the intent to eliminate the<br />
additional state aid for Tax Reduction by 2018. Such<br />
a reduction could cost <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> $150 million if fully<br />
enacted.<br />
Federal Revenue<br />
Federal sources account for $20.4 million or<br />
2.5 percent of the total revenue of the<br />
General Fund <strong>Budget</strong>. The School Health<br />
and Related Services program represents<br />
$18 million of total general fund federal<br />
funding. A<strong>ISD</strong> received $13.8 million from<br />
the federal Edujobs grant in FY2012. This<br />
was a one-time general fund infusion and<br />
will expire for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year.<br />
Federal revenue is estimated to decrease<br />
by $8.7 million or 29.9 percent from the<br />
prior year adopted budget.<br />
Expenditures<br />
Expenditures decreased approximately $2.5<br />
million. Of this amount, payroll costs<br />
increased $10.6 million, Chapter 41<br />
payments decreased $23.4 million, supplies<br />
and materials increased $3.4 million, other<br />
operating expenditures increased $1.2<br />
million, professional and contracted<br />
services increased $6 million (net of the<br />
$23.4 million Chapter 41 increase) and debt<br />
service decreased $169,338.<br />
During the budget development process,<br />
the district has made significant budget<br />
reductions based on the decreased revenue<br />
projections from both state and federal<br />
sources. Unfortunately, the district will be<br />
forced to continue reducing expenditures<br />
due to the bleak revenue forecasts for<br />
future budgets.<br />
Fund Balance<br />
There will be a budget shortage of revenues<br />
over expenditures in an amount of almost<br />
$28 million. The deficit will be funded by the<br />
General Fund unassigned fund balance.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 134
Table 60<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function<br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
Variance with<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Prior Year<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
% Variance with<br />
Prior Year<br />
Adopted<br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 664,832,840 $ 653,112,865 $ 638,484,837 $ 677,368,777 $ 38,883,940<br />
6.09%<br />
State Sources 126,019,476 162,678,023 170,302,248 110,259,107 (60,043,141) -35.26%<br />
Federal Sources 38,219,854 42,432,291 29,085,672 20,386,584 (8,699,088) -29.9%<br />
Total Revenues 829,072,170 858,223,179 837,872,757 808,014,468 (29,858,289) -3.56%<br />
Expenditures by Function<br />
Current<br />
Instruction $ 397,551,020 $ 399,301,376 $ 419,734,596 $ 432,107,452 $ 12,372,856<br />
2.95%<br />
Instructional Resources & Media Services 12,652,232 12,248,753 11,321,673 10,785,702 (535,971) -4.73%<br />
Curriculum & Staff Development 16,995,999 14,310,972 16,259,504 16,394,100 134,596 0.83%<br />
Instructional Administration 10,800,228 9,673,934 9,795,691 10,194,410 398,719 4.07%<br />
School Administration 46,634,597 46,971,582 46,812,796 47,911,053 1,098,257 2.35%<br />
Guidance & Counseling Services 19,054,858 19,417,443 18,726,353 19,694,749 968,396 5.17%<br />
Attendance & Social Work Services 2,893,886 3,040,796 2,970,687 2,906,651 (64,036) -2.16%<br />
Health Services 5,132,193 5,744,568 5,946,564 6,131,553 184,989 3.11%<br />
Pupil Transportation 25,474,229 26,441,452 24,488,580 27,109,548 2,620,968 10.70%<br />
Co-Curricular Activities 14,604,097 14,532,159 13,262,821 13,376,167 113,346 0.85%<br />
General Administration 17,124,548 16,532,883 17,064,813 18,248,506 1,183,693 6.94%<br />
Plant Maintenance 80,180,361 77,751,820 77,374,097 79,012,294 1,638,197 2.12%<br />
Security & Monitoring Services 9,466,965 9,028,580 9,577,526 9,897,984 320,458 3.35%<br />
Data Processing Services 17,841,016 18,498,506 17,244,095 17,803,638 559,543 3.24%<br />
Community Services 5,605,139 5,389,892 4,426,066 4,627,381 201,315 4.55%<br />
Debt Services 1,129,300 1,129,400 1,046,903 877,565 (169,338) -16.18%<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction 2,528,017 2,101,455 1,320,000 1,320,000 - 0.00%<br />
Contracted Instructional Srvc.-Public Schools 111,937,679 123,774,675 135,176,524 111,739,859 (23,436,665) -17.34%<br />
Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 1,700,441 1,658,106 1,233,902 1,658,106 424,204 34.38%<br />
Other Intergovernmental Charges 3,953,241 4,150,819 4,717,540 4,164,661 (552,879) -11.7%<br />
Total Expenditures 803,260,046 811,699,171 838,500,731 835,961,379 (2,539,352) -0.3%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
25,812,124 46,524,008 (627,974) (27,946,911) (27,318,937) 4350.33%<br />
Other Financing Sources (Uses)<br />
Other Resources 196,725 80,025 51,000 51,000 - 0.00%<br />
Other Uses (109,050) (73,387) (81,000) (81,000) - 0.0%<br />
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 87,675 6,638 (30,000) (30,000) - 0.0%<br />
Net Change in Fund Balances 25,899,799 46,530,646 (657,974) (27,976,911) (27,318,937) 4151.98%<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase orders and<br />
unspent balances at year end 30,064,925<br />
Fund Balances- September 1 (Beginning) 146,235,297 172,135,096 218,665,742 248,072,693 29,406,951 13.4%<br />
Fund Balances - August 31 (Ending) 172,135,096 218,665,742 248,072,693 220,095,782 (27,976,911) -11.3%<br />
Less Assigned Fund Balance (23,808,573) (39,038,247) (48,983,942) (35,530,274) 13,453,668 -27.5%<br />
Ending Fund Balance - Unassigned $ 148,326,523 $ 179,627,495 $ 199,088,751 $ 184,565,508 $ (14,523,243) -7.3%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total <strong>Budget</strong><br />
18% 22% 24% 22%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 135
A Comparison of the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to the F2013 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
General Fund expenditures will decrease $2.5 million or approximately 0.3 percent from the FY2012<br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. The net increase results from a $14.2 million increase for a nonrecurring employee<br />
payment allotment to provide the equivalent of a 3 percent increase, a $3 million increase for Annual ts,<br />
and $12.9 million in other budget reductions.<br />
General Fund revenue is expected to decrease by $29.9 million from the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>. The<br />
net decrease results from an increase of approximately $38.9 million in local revenue sources, a<br />
decrease of $60 million in state sources and a decrease of $8.7 million in federal sources. The decrease<br />
in state and federal revenue is somewhat offset by an increased Certified Local Property Tax Valuation.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong><br />
When the Chapter 41 payments are excluded from revenue, A<strong>ISD</strong> will retain $696.3 million in operating<br />
revenue to support district functions for <strong>FY2013</strong>, as compared to the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> operating<br />
revenue of $702.7 million. The decrease in the Chapter 41 expenditure helps offset the large decrease in<br />
state aid. This represents a decrease of 0.91 percent or $6.4 million in operating revenue for the district in<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 136
Table 61<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function and Object<br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Taxes- Current Year Levy $ 625,859,498 $ 652,782,885 $ 637,062,884 $ 627,260,426 $ 663,763,869 $ 36,503,443 5.82%<br />
Taxes- Prior Years 3,109,391 3,339,283 4,308,521 3,200,000 4,436,915 1,236,915 38.65%<br />
Penalty & Interest 3,108,693 3,335,172 3,296,161 3,100,000 3,394,387 294,387 9.50%<br />
Tuition & Fees 800,677 658,611 692,699 700,000 1,570,955 870,955 124.42%<br />
Athletic Activities 634,287 678,995 729,294 640,900 743,880 102,980 16.07%<br />
Earnings from Investments 3,039,348 554,266 393,716 600,000 401,630 (198,370) -33.06%<br />
Gifts and Bequests 197,958 64,049 25,230 141,066 - (141,066) -100.00%<br />
Insurance Recovery 1,255,394 16,333 2,333,537 100,000 - (100,000) 0.00%<br />
Erate Reimbursement 379,544 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
Rent Revenues 784,573 938,128 1,157,557 1,014,768 1,014,768 - 0.00%<br />
Other Revenues -Local Sources 1,810,702 2,465,118 3,113,266 1,727,677 2,042,373 314,696 18.21%<br />
TOTAL 640,980,065 664,832,840 653,112,865 638,484,837 677,368,777 38,883,940 6.09%<br />
STATE REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Per Capita Apportionment 19,252,679 9,075,326 25,432,653 19,081,728 47,073,537 27,991,809 146.69%<br />
Foundation School Program 167,662,657 89,130,638 109,384,215 121,088,928 33,053,978 (88,034,950) -72.70%<br />
Prior Year State Rev Adjustments 201,806 - - - - - 0.00%<br />
State Indirect Costs 45,829 229,746 242,268 - - - 0.00%<br />
Other State Revenue 76,396 161,867 169,947 100,000 100,000 - 0.00%<br />
TRS on Behalf (Book Entry Only) 28,913,863 27,421,899 27,448,940 30,031,592 30,031,592 - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL 216,153,230 126,019,476 162,678,023 170,302,248 110,259,107 (60,043,141) -35.26%<br />
FEDERAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Federal Indirect Costs 1,701,124 2,224,404 2,310,644 1,600,000 2,163,595 563,595 35.22%<br />
State Stabilization Funds - 22,187,440 24,280,941 - - - 0.00%<br />
Federal Revenue Through TEA 242,235 256,426 244,110 13,985,672 199,000 (13,786,672) -98.58%<br />
School Health & Related Services 1,300,610 13,551,584 15,596,596 13,500,000 18,023,989 4,523,989 33.51%<br />
TOTAL 3,243,969 38,219,854 42,432,291 29,085,672 20,386,584 (8,699,088) -29.91%<br />
GENERAL FUND REVENUE TOTAL $ 860,377,264 $ 829,072,170 $ 858,223,179 $ 837,872,757 $ 808,014,468 $ (29,858,289) -3.70%<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
11 Instruction<br />
Payroll Costs $ 374,167,504 $ 385,805,020 $ 386,873,807 $ 407,741,402 $ 412,159,712 $ 4,418,310 1.08%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 3,020,317 $ 2,875,416 $ 3,071,985 $ 3,014,320 $ 8,593,458 $ 5,579,138 185.09%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 8,303,621 $ 7,699,780 $ 8,061,160 $ 8,240,693 $ 10,397,545 $ 2,156,852 26.17%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 1,315,981 $ 1,035,330 $ 920,431 $ 738,181 $ 956,737 $ 218,556 29.61%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 213,294 $ 135,474 $ 373,993 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 387,020,717 $ 397,551,020 $ 399,301,376 $ 419,734,596 $ 432,107,452 $ 12,372,856 2.95%<br />
12 Instructional Resource & Media<br />
Payroll Costs $ 10,919,363 $ 11,106,268 $ 10,664,810 $ 9,942,010 $ 9,421,612 $ (520,398) -5.23%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 181,602 $ 250,866 $ 205,514 $ 226,638 $ 229,166 $ 2,528 1.12%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 3,274,943 $ 1,252,667 $ 1,264,160 $ 1,073,832 $ 1,054,537 $ (19,295) -1.80%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 89,952 $ 36,406 $ 20,530 $ 32,193 $ 33,387 $ 1,194 3.71%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 108,627 $ 6,025 $ 93,739 $ 47,000 $ 47,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 14,574,487 $ 12,652,232 $ 12,248,753 $ 11,321,673 $ 10,785,702 $ (535,971) -4.73%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development<br />
Payroll Costs $ 11,297,458 $ 13,727,720 $ 12,134,669 $ 14,358,628 $ 14,284,725 $ (73,903) -0.51%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 1,176,021 $ 1,339,679 $ 600,834 $ 668,139 $ 648,310 $ (19,829) -2.97%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 748,757 $ 887,611 $ 663,275 $ 791,473 $ 876,258 $ 84,785 10.71%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 1,465,275 $ 1,040,989 $ 912,194 $ 441,264 $ 584,807 $ 143,543 32.53%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 5,130 $- $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 14,692,641 $ 16,995,999 $ 14,310,972 $ 16,259,504 $ 16,394,100 $ 134,596 0.83%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 137
Table 61 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function and Object<br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
21 Instructional Administration<br />
Payroll Costs $ 8,906,728 $ 8,941,999 $ 8,105,239 $ 7,507,017 $ 7,882,898 $ 375,881 5.01%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 1,081,081 $ 1,058,876 $ 969,224 $ 1,318,573 $ 1,321,525 $ 2,952 0.22%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 664,811 $ 545,627 $ 443,985 $ 865,774 $ 871,140 $ 5,366 0.62%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 372,187 $ 233,926 $ 155,486 $ 104,327 $ 118,847 $ 14,520 13.92%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 16,769 $ 19,800 $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 11,041,576 $ 10,800,228 $ 9,673,934 $ 9,795,691 $ 10,194,410 $ 398,719 4.07%<br />
23 School Administration<br />
Payroll Costs $ 44,727,831 $ 45,941,750 $ 46,292,717 $ 46,379,903 $ 47,479,076 $ 1,099,173 2.37%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 131,659 $ 160,446 $ 181,774 $ 148,176 $ 127,035 $ (21,141) -14.27%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 510,349 $ 450,057 $ 402,387 $ 232,380 $ 234,847 $ 2,467 1.06%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 96,805 $ 82,344 $ 94,704 $ 52,337 $ 70,095 $ 17,758 33.93%<br />
TOTAL $ 45,466,644 $ 46,634,597 $ 46,971,582 $ 46,812,796 $ 47,911,053 $ 1,098,257 2.35%<br />
31 Guidance and Counseling<br />
Payroll Costs $ 16,965,762 $ 17,816,842 $ 18,298,872 $ 17,415,427 $ 18,121,447 $ 706,020 4.05%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 489,575 $ 388,774 $ 328,428 $ 614,371 $ 665,571 $ 51,200 8.33%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 857,753 $ 754,454 $ 690,825 $ 657,171 $ 851,908 $ 194,737 29.63%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 108,242 $ 94,788 $ 92,642 $ 39,384 $ 55,823 $ 16,439 41.74%<br />
Capital Outlay $ - $- $ 6,676 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 18,421,332 $ 19,054,858 $ 19,417,443 $ 18,726,353 $ 19,694,749 $ 968,396 5.17%<br />
32 Social Services<br />
Payroll Costs $ 2,543,099 $ 2,661,990 $ 2,982,912 $ 2,638,146 $ 2,573,625 $ (64,521) -2.45%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 140,250 $ 210,998 $ 34,103 $ 303,792 $ 303,792 $ - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 25,786 $ 15,381 $ 10,965 $ 18,687 $ 19,172 $ 485 2.60%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 30,498 $ 5,517 $ 12,816 $ 10,062 $ 10,062 $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 2,739,633 $ 2,893,886 $ 3,040,796 $ 2,970,687 $ 2,906,651 $ (64,036) -2.16%<br />
33 Health Services<br />
Payroll Costs $ 526,125 $ 530,352 $ 554,950 $ 537,452 $ 550,391 $ 12,939 2.41%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 4,825,064 $ 4,586,578 $ 5,149,995 $ 5,367,312 $ 5,539,412 $ 172,100 3.21%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 17,671 $ 12,553 $ 37,894 $ 41,800 $ 41,750 $ (50) -0.12%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 3,677 $ 2,710 $ 1,729 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 5,372,537 $ 5,132,193 $ 5,744,568 $ 5,946,564 $ 6,131,553 $ 184,989 3.11%<br />
34 Student Transportation<br />
Payroll Costs $ 22,836,996 $ 23,495,865 $ 23,595,642 $ 21,951,643 $ 23,664,728 $ 1,713,085 7.80%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 1,132,216 $ 249,953 $ 211,715 $ 206,500 $ 209,500 $ 3,000 1.45%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 2,432,793 $ 2,701,825 $ 3,535,235 $ 3,178,417 $ 4,117,600 $ 939,183 29.55%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ (835,744) $ (973,414) $ (1,008,190) $ (847,980) $ (882,280) $ (34,300) 4.04%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 8,995 $ - $ 107,050 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 25,575,256 $ 25,474,229 $ 26,441,452 $ 24,488,580 $ 27,109,548 $ 2,620,968 10.70%<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities<br />
Payroll Costs $ 9,931,624 $ 10,825,419 $ 10,786,996 $ 10,281,910 $ 10,355,084 $ 73,174 0.71%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 1,029,038 $ 1,136,495 $ 1,124,819 $ 920,262 $ 1,074,350 $ 154,088 16.74%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 1,090,240 $ 1,109,453 $ 1,062,674 $ 971,686 $ 872,475 $ (99,211) -10.21%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 1,394,785 $ 1,403,577 $ 1,519,669 $ 1,088,963 $ 1,074,258 $ (14,705) -1.35%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 210,608 $ 129,153 $ 38,001 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 13,656,295 $ 14,604,097 $ 14,532,159 $ 13,262,821 $ 13,376,167 $ 113,346 0.85%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 138
Table 61 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function and Object<br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
41 General Administration<br />
Payroll Costs $ 14,029,715 $ 13,403,330 $ 13,572,186 $ 13,975,151 $ 14,463,666 $ 488,515 3.50%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 2,789,709 $ 2,317,453 $ 2,059,670 $ 1,664,221 $ 1,959,841 $ 295,620 17.76%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 446,032 $ 541,993 $ 485,387 $ 545,516 $ 555,442 $ 9,926 1.82%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 1,059,930 $ 861,772 $ 409,400 $ 879,925 $ 1,269,557 $ 389,632 44.28%<br />
Capital Outlay $- $ - $ 6,240 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 18,325,386 $ 17,124,548 $ 16,532,883 $ 17,064,813 $ 18,248,506 $ 1,183,693 6.94%<br />
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations<br />
Payroll Costs $ 42,625,397 $ 40,900,240 $ 39,670,791 $ 40,403,067 $ 41,711,543 $ 1,308,476 3.24%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 32,714,798 $ 31,984,050 $ 32,050,898 $ 31,441,321 $ 31,706,892 $ 265,571 0.84%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 4,554,787 $ 4,609,972 $ 4,352,458 $ 3,742,156 $ 3,828,804 $ 86,648 2.32%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 1,739,835 $ 2,233,347 $ 1,639,474 $ 1,729,553 $ 1,707,055 $ (22,498) -1.30%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 139,366 $ 452,752 $ 38,199 $ 58,000 $ 58,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 81,774,183 $ 80,180,361 $ 77,751,820 $ 77,374,097 $ 79,012,294 $ 1,638,197 2.12%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services<br />
Payroll Costs $ 8,573,494 $ 8,863,239 $ 8,417,648 $ 9,029,501 $ 9,348,958 $ 319,457 3.54%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 78,276 $ 65,255 $ 70,225 $ 87,858 $ 88,358 $ 500 0.57%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 537,354 $ 446,139 $ 403,500 $ 402,607 $ 403,107 $ 500 0.12%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 110,415 $ 71,607 $ 84,900 $ 50,325 $ 50,326 $ 1 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 315,767 $ 20,725 $ 52,307 $ 7,235 $ 7,235 $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 9,615,306 $ 9,466,965 $ 9,028,580 $ 9,577,526 $ 9,897,984 $ 320,458 3.35%<br />
53 Data Processing Services<br />
Payroll Costs $ 10,739,629 $ 10,837,656 $ 10,431,465 $ 11,078,514 $ 11,638,057 $ 559,543 5.05%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 3,623,466 $ 3,082,208 $ 2,848,894 $ 2,859,366 $ 2,859,366 $ - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 4,108,525 $ 3,580,927 $ 4,809,026 $ 3,255,056 $ 3,255,056 $ - 0.00%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 172,542 $ 80,618 $ 56,037 $ 26,159 $ 26,159 $ - 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 172,231 $ 259,607 $ 353,084 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 18,816,394 $ 17,841,016 $ 18,498,506 $ 17,244,095 $ 17,803,638 $ 559,543 3.24%<br />
61 Community Services<br />
Payroll Costs $ 4,876,332 $ 4,704,715 $ 4,512,651 $ 3,447,906 $ 3,610,771 $ 162,865 4.72%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 803,969 $ 767,233 $ 732,000 $ 901,015 $ 931,015 $ 30,000 3.33%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 59,556 $ 70,721 $ 91,709 $ 68,535 $ 68,635 $ 100 0.15%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 146,899 $ 62,470 $ 53,532 $ 8,610 $ 16,960 $ 8,350 96.98%<br />
TOTAL $ 5,886,757 $ 5,605,139 $ 5,389,892 $ 4,426,066 $ 4,627,381 $ 201,315 4.55%<br />
71 Debt Service<br />
Debt Service $ 1,122,270 $ 1,129,300 $ 1,129,400 $ 1,046,903 $ 877,565 $ (169,338) -16.18%<br />
TOTAL $ 1,122,270 $ 1,129,300 $ 1,129,400 $ 1,046,903 $ 877,565 $ (169,338) -16.18%<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
Payroll Costs $ - $ - $ 3,512 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 579,618 $ 610,402 $ 604,300 $ 1,320,000 $ 1,320,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
Supplies & Materials $ 26,768 $ 26,501 $ 26,501 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 31,388 $ 22,989 $ 9,419 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
Capital Outlay $ 4,576,987 $ 1,868,125 $ 1,457,723 $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 5,214,761 $ 2,528,017 $ 2,101,455 $ 1,320,000 $ 1,320,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 139
Table 61 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
General Fund Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Function and Object<br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
% Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
Over Prior<br />
Year<br />
91 Contracted Srvcs Between Public Schools<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 177,664,513 $ 111,937,679 $ 123,774,675 $ 135,176,524 $ 111,739,859 $ (23,436,665) -17.34%<br />
TOTAL $ 177,664,513 $ 111,937,679 $ 123,774,675 $ 135,176,524 $ 111,739,859 $ (23,436,665) -17.34%<br />
93 Payments For Shared Svcs<br />
Other Operating Expenses $ 1,244,061 $ 1,700,441 $ 1,658,106 $ 1,233,902 $ 1,658,106 $ 424,204 25.58%<br />
TOTAL $ 1,244,061 $ 1,700,441 $ 1,658,106 $ 1,233,902 $ 1,658,106 $ 424,204 25.58%<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. $ 3,843,994 $ 3,953,241 $ 4,150,819 $ 4,717,540 $ 4,164,661 $ (552,879) -11.72%<br />
TOTAL $ 3,843,994 $ 3,953,241 $ 4,150,819 $ 4,717,540 $ 4,164,661 $ (552,879) -11.72%<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 862,068,744 $ 803,260,046 $ 811,699,171 $ 838,500,731 $ 835,961,379 $ (2,539,352) -0.30%<br />
OTHER SOURCES $<br />
-<br />
Loan Proceeds $ 64,129 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
Operating Transfer In $ 1,394,910 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
Sale of Real Property $ - $ 196,725 $ 80,025 $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 1,459,039 $ 196,725 $ 80,025 $ 51,000 $ 51,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
OTHER USES<br />
Legal Settlement $ 217,284 $ 109,050 $ 73,387 $ 81,000 $ 81,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
Operating Transfer Out $ 5,054,461 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 5,271,745 $ 109,050 $ 73,387 $ 81,000 $ 81,000 $ - 0.00%<br />
NET SOURCES OVER (UNDER) $ (3,812,706) $ 87,675 $ 6,638 $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ - 0.00%<br />
NET REVENUE/SOURCES OVER (UNDER)<br />
$ (5,504,185) $ 25,899,799 $ 46,530,646 $ (657,974) $ (27,976,911) $ (27,318,937) 4151.98%<br />
ESTIMATED OUTSTANDING PURCHASE<br />
ORDERS AND UNSPENT BALANCES AT<br />
YEAR END<br />
$<br />
30,064,925<br />
FUNDING BALANCES-SEPT 1 (BEGINNING) $ 151,739,483 $ 146,235,297 $ 172,135,096 $ 218,665,742 $ 248,072,693 $ 29,406,951 13.45%<br />
FUNDING BALANCES-AUG 31 (ENDING) $ 146,235,297 $ 172,135,096 $ 218,665,742 $ 248,072,693 $ 220,095,782 $ (27,976,911) -11.28%<br />
LESS ASSIGNED BALANCE $ (25,279,819) $ (23,808,573) $ (39,038,247) $ (48,983,942) $ (35,530,274) $ 13,453,668 -27.47%<br />
ENDING FUND BALANCE - UNASSIGNED $ 120,955,478 $ 148,326,523 $ 179,627,495 $ 199,088,751 $ 184,565,508 $ (14,523,243) -7.29%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Expenditures<br />
14% 18% 22% 24% 22%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 140
Table 62<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> Comparison With and Without Chapter 41<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
With Chapter 41 Without Chapter 41<br />
Salaries $ 627,266,293 75.0% $ 627,266,293 86.6%<br />
Chapter 41 Payments 111,739,859 13.4% - 0.0%<br />
Contracted Services 61,742,252 7.4% 61,742,252 8.5%<br />
Supplies & Materials 27,448,276 3.3% 27,448,276 3.8%<br />
Other Operating Expenses 6,749,899 0.8% 6,749,899 0.9%<br />
Debt Service 877,565 0.1% 877,565 0.1%<br />
Capital Outlay 137,235 0.0% 137,235 0.0%<br />
Other Uses 81,000 0.0% 81,000 0.0%<br />
Total $ 836,042,379 100% $ 724,302,520 100%<br />
Table 63<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> Comparison With and Without Chapter 41 by Percent<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund including Chapter 41<br />
Salaries<br />
75.04%<br />
Capital Outlay<br />
0.02%<br />
Debt Service<br />
0.10%<br />
Supplies &<br />
Other<br />
Materials<br />
Operating<br />
3.28%<br />
Expenses<br />
0.81%<br />
Chapter 41<br />
Payments<br />
13.37%<br />
Contracted<br />
Services 7.39%<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> General Fund excluding Chapter 41<br />
Salaries<br />
86.61%<br />
Capital<br />
Outlay<br />
0.02%<br />
Debt Service<br />
0.12% Supplies &<br />
Materials<br />
Other Operating 3.79%<br />
Expenses<br />
0.93%<br />
Contracted<br />
Services<br />
8.53%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 141
Table 64<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures<br />
From the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Revenue<br />
1 Decrease in State Aid $ (60,043,141)<br />
2 Decrease in Education Jobs funding $ (13,798,672)<br />
3 Increase in tax levy, current and prior years $<br />
37,689,358<br />
4 Increase in the School Health Reimbursement Program (SHARS) $<br />
4,523,989<br />
5 Increase in Tuition and Fees $<br />
870,955<br />
6 Increase in Federal Indirect Costs $<br />
563,595<br />
7 Other $<br />
284,627<br />
Net Change in Revenues $ (29,909,289)<br />
Expenditures<br />
A Employee Payments<br />
One-time 3% compensation adjustment for all regular employees $<br />
14,160,000<br />
B New Delivery Models/Implementing the Annual Academic and Facilities<br />
Recommendations (AAFRs)<br />
1 North Central elementary schools overcrowding $<br />
1,444,371<br />
2 Dual Language Immersion Programs to four additional schools $<br />
191,192<br />
3 In-District Charter: Graduation Pathways Education Program $<br />
1,023,512<br />
4 In-District Charter: IDEA Allan College Preparation $<br />
323,445<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
2,982,520<br />
C Additions For Continuing Strategic Plan Initiatives<br />
5 Provide early Pre-K registration so that students are enrolled and have access to<br />
free/reduced lunch on the first day of school. Pre-K testing materials. $<br />
151,000<br />
6 Addition AIMS web licenses to include grades 3 through 9 $<br />
246,063<br />
7 Continue funding the Twilight Program at its north and south campus. The program has<br />
been successful in reclaiming dropouts and providing an evening school option for<br />
students to reclaim/accelerate course credits and meet graduation requirements. To<br />
date, participating students have reclaimed 808 credits, and 177 students have<br />
graduated. $<br />
780,045<br />
8 Continue supporting the Schoolnet Instructional Management System after the grant<br />
expires. $<br />
71,404<br />
9 Continue supporting external service providers and their grantors so that they can<br />
monitor the outcomes of students that are served by their programs, maintaining<br />
National Student Clearinghouse data for post secondary enrollment, and the Substance<br />
Use and Safety Survey once grants expire. $<br />
53,450<br />
10 Expand the existing ACE program for 35 tutors to 80 tutors who will serve students at a<br />
third of A<strong>ISD</strong>'s elementary campuses. ACE tutors provide small group and whole class<br />
research and early literacy intervention. $<br />
300,000<br />
11 Bus monitors for Uphaus ECC bus transportation $<br />
243,000<br />
12 Continue supporting multicultural outreach initiatives through contracted programming<br />
such as radio shows, parental engagement, support for multiple languages in addition to<br />
Spanish, and support educational fairs. $<br />
159,000<br />
13 Anderson Vertical Team to implement "One World Schools," based on the tenants of the<br />
International Baccalaureate Organization. $<br />
288,658<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
2,292,620<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 142
Table 64 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures<br />
From the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
D New Strategic Plan Investments<br />
14 Implement a dual-phase dyslexia program that includes a dyslexia specialist, multi<br />
sensory reading program materials, and training. $<br />
128,000<br />
15 Increase the number of K-2 students reading at or above grade level with the addition of<br />
10 Primary Literacy Campus Specialists. $<br />
849,490<br />
16 Provide clerical support for the Social and Emotional Learning Program $<br />
25,000<br />
17 Create a substitute hiring pool for custodians to keep up with school level housekeeping<br />
needs. $<br />
130,504<br />
18 Allot funding for the Texas Virtual School Network (TxVSN), which allows students to take<br />
online courses for high school credit. $<br />
70,000<br />
19 Additional A/C mechanics and plumbers to reduce the work order backlog and reduce<br />
overtime pay. $<br />
284,663<br />
Sub-total $<br />
1,487,657<br />
E Statutorily Required or Contractually Obligated<br />
20 Plan for projected increase in special education student enrollment and PPCD<br />
increases. In FY2012, there was an increase of 497 students in special education and<br />
a 25% increase in students requiring PPCD services. $<br />
1,618,954<br />
21 Conduct summer retesting for an additional grade as required under new state<br />
$<br />
110,000<br />
assessment requirements for end-of-course test takers.<br />
22 Provide transportation services for students retaking end-of-course assessments and $<br />
150,000<br />
STAAR exit-level in July 2013.<br />
23 Provide transportation services for three additional student days of instruction (district<br />
calendar change) $<br />
180,000<br />
24 Fund increased annual fees imposed by the Greater <strong>Austin</strong>/Travis Regional Radio<br />
System for radio communications used by bus transportation, police, school<br />
administrators, emergency management and maintenance. $<br />
20,000<br />
25 Pay the increasing cost of high school graduations, including the first class of seniors at<br />
the Ann Richards school, and summer school graduates. $<br />
36,282<br />
26 Fund increased enrollment and participation in the Early College High School Program<br />
at LBJ & Reagan high schools. Up to 1,800 students could enroll to earn dual credit<br />
from <strong>Austin</strong> Community College. $<br />
320,000<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
2,435,236<br />
F Revenue Generating or Cost Avoidance<br />
27 Hire a district-wide Sustainability Coordinator to analyze energy use and implement<br />
measures to reduce utility usage and increase energy efficiency and environmental<br />
sustainability, which will reduce operating expenditures in the long term. $<br />
69,052<br />
28 Tuition based Pre-K program $<br />
70,955<br />
29 IDEA Allan Buy Back Services (offset by revenue to be collected from IDEA) $<br />
256,781<br />
30 Hire an additional grant writer to support the submission of an additional $10 million in<br />
grant proposal submission for the district. $<br />
80,000<br />
31 Hire an additional FTE to provide additional assessment data and evaluation planning for<br />
the grant development process $<br />
92,000<br />
32 Implementation of a district-wide Health and Wellness initiative to contain future<br />
healthcare costs<br />
Cost Neutral<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
568,788<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 143
Table 64 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Changes in General Fund Revenues and Expenditures<br />
From the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> to <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong><br />
G Baseline Increases<br />
33 New school operating impact costs (Uphaus ECC) $<br />
1,088,283<br />
34 Wastewater $<br />
468,684<br />
35 Enrollment growth $<br />
4,044,934<br />
36 Health insurance increase $<br />
3,372,438<br />
37 Gasoline and fuels for student transportation $<br />
894,483<br />
Sub-Total $<br />
9,868,822<br />
Total Additions $<br />
33,795,643<br />
H Reductions In <strong>Budget</strong><br />
38 Decrease in Chapter 41 estimate $ (23,436,665)<br />
39 Other budget reductions to achieve savings $ (12,898,329)<br />
Total Reductions $ (36,334,994)<br />
Net Change in the Expenditure <strong>Budget</strong> $<br />
(2,539,352)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 144
General Fund - Future Expenditure Considerations<br />
Option to Stabilize Revenue through a Tax Increase<br />
To stabilize district revenue and sustain a long-term salary increase, the district would need to increase<br />
its tax rate by 6 cents for the maintenance and operations (M&O) budget. In this way, the district could<br />
increase its revenue to support proposed budget increases and protect its reserve levels to mitigate<br />
potential future cuts in state funding.<br />
Under state law, school districts must get voter approval for any increase in M&O tax rates. The A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Board of Trustees would need to call for a Tax Ratification Election (TRE) in June 2013 or November<br />
2013 in order to fund a compensation increase. Texas school districts are the only local taxing authorities<br />
that are required to get voter approval in order to increase taxes. This has been the case since 2006, the<br />
last time the state Legislature passed school finance legislation. Other local entities, including the city and<br />
the county, are not required to seek voter approval for limited tax increases. If the voters approved, this<br />
would be the first increase to the M&O tax rate sought by the district since FY2009 when voters ratified an<br />
increase of nearly four cents by increasing the tax rate from 1.04, which is the maximum tax rate the<br />
district can establish without voter approval, to 1.079. Increasing the tax rate from 1.079/$100 to<br />
1.139/$100 would generate an additional $20.9 million in net revenue for the district and increase the tax<br />
bill for the average homeowner by $154. Increasing the tax rate from 1.079/$100 to 1.170/$100 would<br />
generate an additional $31.7 million in net revenue for the district and increase the tax bill for the average<br />
homeowner by $230.The debt service tax rate (also known as I&S) would remain flat at 1.063/$100 of<br />
taxable value.<br />
While the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> does not assume a tax rate increase, the district would like to continue<br />
its dialogue with the <strong>Austin</strong> community about the possibility of considering a TRE in future years to secure<br />
the revenue needed to implement a permanent salary increase for employees and support key academic<br />
programming. The below scenarios are based on the certified values from TCAD.<br />
Table 65<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Tax Ratification Election (TRE) Projected Revenue Scenarios<br />
Local Revenue<br />
Generated<br />
Net Revenue<br />
Retained<br />
Estimated Average<br />
Taxpayer Impact<br />
Estimated Median<br />
Taxpayer Impact<br />
Scenario<br />
Tax Rate (Above Status Quo) (Above Status Quo) (Annual Increase) (Annual Increase)<br />
Status quo 1.0790 n/a n/a $7 ($20)<br />
Four-cent increase 1.1190 $23.6M $14.0M $106 $56<br />
Five-cent increase 1.1290 $29.4M $17.5M $130 $76<br />
Six-cent increase 1.1390 $35.3M $20.9M $154 $95<br />
Seven-cent increase 1.1490 $41.2M $24.4M $178 $114<br />
Eight-cent increase 1.1590 $47.1M $27.9M $203 $133<br />
Nine-cent increase<br />
(maximum) 1.1700 $53.6M $31.70 $230 $154<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 145
Other Funding Considerations for a TRE<br />
There are a number of important Strategic Plan priorities that could be supported through a TRE.<br />
Pre-kindergarten/Early Childhood - In FY2012, A<strong>ISD</strong> lost nearly $5 million in state grant funds to support<br />
full day pre-k. One-time Federal funds made up for these losses but they are due to expire in <strong>FY2013</strong> so<br />
funds are needed to fully restore the program going forward. Additionally, resource support for early<br />
literacy before 3rd grade is critically important to strengthen student success. The district is budgeting<br />
$19.4 million to support a full day pre-kindergarten program in <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
Fine Arts - A<strong>ISD</strong> is in partnership with the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, to establish a<br />
long range plan to deliver fine arts to A<strong>ISD</strong> students. The first phase of the program begins with a<br />
comprehensive audit of existing arts education resources and a needs assessment by Kennedy Center<br />
staff to determine gaps. Based on this information, a plan is created that focuses on increasing arts<br />
education opportunities for K-8 students. Funding from a TRE could be used to address any gaps that are<br />
found. The district currently budgets approximately $15.4 million for fine arts programming.<br />
Athletics - Along with fine arts, critical investments are needed for athletics to support district needs in<br />
areas such as: ensuring equity in athletics programming across the district, replenishing team uniforms,<br />
providing access to field trips, obtaining quality protective gear and improving facilities and equipment.<br />
Unlike fine arts, a comprehensive assessment has not yet been initiated. However, the district’s Capital<br />
Improvement and Bond Planning Advisory Committee (CIBPAC) has indicated that investments are<br />
needed in both infrastructure and programming. The district currently budgets more than $10.7 million for<br />
athletics programming.<br />
Social Emotional Learning - A<strong>ISD</strong> has partnered with the Collaborative for Academic, Social and<br />
Emotional Learning (CASEL) to strengthen Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) district-wide. SEL is the<br />
process whereby children develop essential social and emotional skills, knowledge and attitudes to<br />
ensure academic success and preparation for college, career and life. Funds could be used to accelerate<br />
the implementation of SEL in all schools to improve student emotional intelligence and behavior leading<br />
to important outcomes such as: reduced bullying, classroom disruption, aggression and interpersonal<br />
violence to create a safe and welcoming school environment and become a national model in the practice<br />
of SEL. The district currently budgets $651,000 for Social Emotional Learning of which, approximately 75<br />
percent is funded with grants and outside resources.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 146
General Fund Campus Information<br />
General Fund Expenditures per Pupil<br />
For <strong>FY2013</strong>, the budgeted operating expenditure per pupil was calculated by dividing the total<br />
expenditures with the enrollment number.<br />
Both the TEA and A<strong>ISD</strong> operating expenditures exclude the following:<br />
Object 6500 Interest on Debt<br />
Object 6600 Capital Outlay<br />
Function 61: Community Services<br />
Function 81: Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
Function 91: Chapter 41 Payments<br />
Function 93: Payments - Shared Services Agreements<br />
Function 99: Intergovernmental Charges<br />
The expenditures per pupil do not represent all funding allocations for each campus. Only the General<br />
Fund <strong>Budget</strong> is included for this calculation purpose.<br />
The actual allocation to campuses includes special programs such as special education, Title I<br />
allocations, etc. The special program allocations vary significantly from campus to campus and from year<br />
to year.<br />
Expenditure variances on a per pupil basis should be expected. No two campuses have the identical<br />
makeup in pupil demographics, teacher experience levels or program offerings.<br />
Why do variances exist among campus per pupil expenditures?<br />
1. Additional programs at secondary campuses versus elementary campuses can cause a higher per<br />
pupil cost.<br />
2. Major shifts in pupil counts due to campus boundary changes and changes in enrollment, cause<br />
swings in per pupil costs from year to year.<br />
3. The average staff experience levels per campus correlate directly with salaries and benefits paid.<br />
The higher the average experience, the higher the salaries and benefits on a per pupil basis.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 147
Table 66<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Operating Expenditures per Student<br />
FY2010 through <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
PEIMS<br />
Actual %<br />
PEIMS<br />
Actual %<br />
PEIMS<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> %<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>* %<br />
Enrollment (Actual/First Six Weeks) 84,245 85,273 86,724 87,336<br />
By Function<br />
11 Instruction $ 4,717 58.85% $ 4,678 59.34% $ 4,661 58.24% $ 4,948 60.73%<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Servcs. 150 1.87% 143 1.81% 130 1.62% 123 1.51%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development 202 2.52% 168 2.13% 257 3.21% 188 2.30%<br />
1x - Instructional 5,069 63.24% 4,989 63.26% 5,049 63.08% 5,258 64.54%<br />
21 Instructional Administration 128 1.59% 113 1.44% 123 1.54% 117 1.43%<br />
23 School Administration 554 6.90% 551 6.99% 529 6.61% 549 6.73%<br />
2x - Instructional-Related 682 8.50% 664 8.43% 652 8.15% 665 8.17%<br />
31 Guidance & Counseling Services 226 2.82% 228 2.89% 229 2.86% 226 2.77%<br />
32 Attendance & Social Work Services 34 0.43% 36 0.45% 38 0.48% 33 0.41%<br />
33 Health Services 61 0.76% 67 0.85% 68 0.85% 70 0.86%<br />
34 Pupil Transportation 302 3.77% 308 3.91% 294 3.67% 310 3.81%<br />
35 Food Services - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%<br />
36 Co-curricular Activities 172 2.15% 170 2.16% 154 1.92% 153 1.88%<br />
3x - Pupil Services 796 9.92% 808 10.26% 783 9.78% 793 9.73%<br />
41 General Administration 203 2.53% 194 2.46% 200 2.49% 209 2.56%<br />
4x - Administrative Support Services 203 2.53% 194 2.46% 200 2.49% 209 2.56%<br />
51 Plant Maintenance 946 11.80% 911 11.56% 974 12.16% 905 11.10%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services 112 1.40% 105 1.34% 111 1.39% 113 1.39%<br />
53 Data Processing Services 209 2.60% 213 2.70% 236 2.95% 204 2.50%<br />
5x - Support Services 1,267 15.81% 1,229 15.59% 1,321 16.50% 1,222 15.00%<br />
TOTAL $ 8,017 100.00% $ 7,884 100.00% $ 8,004 100.00% $ 8,147 100.00%<br />
*PEIMS actual data was used to calculate FY2010 and FY2011, PEIMS budget data was used to calculate FY2012 and the A<strong>ISD</strong> accounting platform<br />
was used to calculate <strong>FY2013</strong> data<br />
The above operating expenditures excludes the following:<br />
Object 6500 Interest on Debt<br />
Object 6600 Capital Outlay<br />
Function 61: Community Services<br />
Function 81: Facilities Acquisition & Construction<br />
Function 91: Chapter 41 Payments<br />
Function 93: Payments - Shared Services Agreements<br />
Function 99: Intergovernmental Charges<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 148
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
General Fund<br />
Campus<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>s
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
A<strong>ISD</strong> High Schools<br />
Akins High School<br />
Anderson High School<br />
Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High School<br />
Bowie High School<br />
Crockett High School<br />
Eastside Memorial High School<br />
IDEA Allan 6-12 (In-District Charter School)<br />
International High School<br />
Lanier High School<br />
LASA-Liberal Arts Science Academy<br />
LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
McCallum High School<br />
Premier High School at Lanier (In-District Charter School)<br />
Premier High School at Travis (In-District Charter School)<br />
Reagan High School<br />
Travis High School<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 149
10701 South 1 st Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . Daniel Girard, Principal<br />
Akins High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 2,588 2,650 2,655 2,733 2,696<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.97 15.62 14.98 17.92 17.29<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 7.00 6.00 8.00 8.00 8.00<br />
Other Professionals 4.45 7.62 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 162.04 169.65 177.20 152.50 155.90<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 10.93 11.83 9.94 9.00 9.00<br />
Educational Aides 22.87 25.00 27.00 24.00 23.00<br />
Total 207.29 220.10 224.14 193.50 195.90<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 12,756,466 $ 13,895,659 $ 13,616,855 $ 13,237,625 $ 13,470,458<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 574,891 613,791 385,969 616,603 599,817<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 446,659 272,162 464,585 280,318 291,138<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 59,363 72,866 120,742 15,331 14,481<br />
Equipment (6600) - - 54,626 - -<br />
Total $ 13,837,378 $ 14,854,478 $ 14,642,777 $ 14,149,877 $ 14,375,894<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,347 $ 5,605 $ 5,515 $ 5,177 $ 5,332<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 81% 87% 87% 88% n/a<br />
Mathematics 58% 66% 72% 71% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 87% 91% 93% 93% n/a<br />
Science 63% 65% 75% 77% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 150
8403 Mesa Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78759 . Donna Houser, Principal<br />
Anderson High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 2,084 1,984 2,089 2,045 2,048<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.69 15.98 16.78 18.16 17.39<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.21 1.93 2.79 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 124.85 124.15 124.52 112.60 117.75<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 11.73 11.63 11.24 8.00 8.00<br />
Educational Aides 20.00 19.00 22.80 17.00 17.00<br />
Total 165.80 162.72 167.35 143.60 148.75<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 10,498,553 $ 10,937,055 $ 9,888,939 $ 10,408,858 $ 10,753,323<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 506,872 586,895 319,994 653,962 635,365<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 329,917 371,872 362,679 233,640 387,149<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 61,712 64,755 78,573 19,967 21,967<br />
Equipment (6600) 1,482 6,540 28,474 - -<br />
Total $ 11,398,535 $ 11,967,117 $ 10,678,660 $ 11,316,427 $ 11,797,804<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,470 $ 6,032 $ 5,112 $ 5,534 $ 5,761<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 95% 95% 94% 94% n/a<br />
Mathematics 87% 90% 91% 91% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 96% 98% 98% 97% n/a<br />
Science 88% 92% 93% 90% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 151
Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders<br />
2206 Prather Lane. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Jeanne Goka, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 332 437 526 618 715<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.94 13.20 13.72 16.70 16.63<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 25.65 33.10 38.33 37.00 43.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.94 2.27 5.05 3.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Total 31.60 39.37 46.38 44.00 50.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,440,480 $ 3,025,685 $ 3,309,514 $ 3,382,051 $ 3,421,964<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 210,312 188,312 123,471 292,444 297,398<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 106,996 169,806 249,357 107,597 121,287<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,966 11,984 30,306 8,430 8,330<br />
Equipment (6600) 5,666 - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,768,420 $ 3,395,787 $ 3,712,649 $ 3,790,522 $ 3,848,979<br />
Per Student Cost n/a $ 7,771 $ 7,058 $ 6,134 $ 5,383<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 100% 100% 99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 99% 100% 99% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 100% 100% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a 99% 100% >99% n/a<br />
Science n/a 89% 90% 98% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 152
1715 W. Cesar Chavez . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78703 . Sandy Compian, Principal<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 2,290 2,350 2,287 2,252 2,199<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.88 16.56 15.28 17.77 18.14<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 6.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.14 1.57 0.06 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 135.67 141.89 149.70 126.70 121.20<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 12.39 11.51 13.47 8.00 8.00<br />
Educational Aides 22.00 21.00 23.00 18.00 17.00<br />
Total 179.20 181.97 193.24 159.70 153.20<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 11,140,183 $ 11,920,397 $ 11,395,160 $ 10,892,858 $ 11,069,718<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 632,904 520,582 304,555 774,163 819,407<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 366,306 274,969 304,234 277,360 280,711<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 28,314 35,341 46,408 19,550 22,950<br />
Equipment (6600) 10,958 - 5,274 - -<br />
Total $ 12,178,665 $ 12,751,289 $ 12,055,632 $ 11,963,931 $ 12,192,786<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,318 $ 5,426 $ 5,271 $ 5,313 $ 5,545<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 88% 93% 93% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 72% 77% 82% 81% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a 0% n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 92% 96% 97% 97% n/a<br />
Science 75% 79% 85% 88% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 153
4103 Slaughter Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Stephen Kane, Principal<br />
Bowie High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 2,752 2,805 2,874 2,892 2,878<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.81 16.87 17.30 19.38 18.32<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.07 1.41 1.17 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 163.68 166.30 166.16 149.20 157.10<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 14.40 14.17 12.85 9.00 9.00<br />
Educational Aides 15.00 17.00 17.98 17.00 15.00<br />
Total 202.15 205.88 205.16 182.20 188.10<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 13,092,117 $ 13,754,088 $ 13,034,463 $ 12,993,186 $ 13,108,034<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 596,415 570,057 324,765 728,021 734,636<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 394,567 337,584 364,870 512,564 338,358<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 56,565 32,360 95,795 25,208 25,208<br />
Equipment (6600) 7,559 14,316 35,598 - -<br />
Total $ 14,147,221 $ 14,708,404 $ 13,855,491 $ 14,258,979 $ 14,206,236<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,141 $ 5,244 $ 4,821 $ 4,930 $ 4,936<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 94% 96% 97% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics 87% 88% 90% 91% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 97% 98% 99% 99% n/a<br />
Science 87% 89% 94% 94% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 154
5601 Manchaca Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78743 . Craig Shapiro, Principal<br />
Crockett High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,809 1,732 1,642 1,561 1,557<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.23 13.67 13.46 15.46 16.13<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 5.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 3.70 1.95 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 127.11 126.67 122.02 101.00 96.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 8.41 8.18 10.32 6.00 6.00<br />
Educational Aides 20.00 21.00 19.91 16.00 15.00<br />
Total 160.52 165.55 159.20 128.00 122.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 9,831,519 $ 10,110,103 $ 9,271,809 $ 9,288,860 $ 9,424,046<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 282,735 501,733 365,836 713,665 711,120<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 433,064 306,539 248,094 209,989 190,151<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,275 44,993 39,847 34,308 33,308<br />
Equipment (6600) 12,152 43,983 - - -<br />
Total $ 10,565,745 $ 11,007,351 $ 9,925,585 $ 10,246,822 $ 10,358,625<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,841 $ 6,355 $ 6,045 $ 6,564 $ 6,653<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 83% 85% 86% 85% n/a<br />
Mathematics 54% 61% 70% 73% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 86% 93% 94% 93% n/a<br />
Science 65% 73% 82% 81% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 155
1012 Arthur Stiles . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78721 . Bryan Miller, Principal<br />
Eastside Memorial High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 531 n/a n/a 633 652<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.91 n/a n/a 14.93 15.31<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 4.00 n/a n/a 3.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.68 n/a n/a 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 48.68 n/a n/a 46.00 42.60<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 9.00 n/a n/a 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 7.00 n/a n/a 9.00 8.00<br />
Total 70.36 0.00 0.00 62.00 58.60<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,388,842 n/a n/a $ 5,366,154 $ 3,486,794<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 416,999 n/a n/a 536,211 474,803<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 233,367 n/a n/a 137,252 132,386<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 123,207 n/a n/a 10,768 8,268<br />
Equipment (6600) 5,500 n/a n/a - -<br />
Total $ 6,167,914 $ - $ - $ 6,050,385 $ 4,102,251<br />
Per Student Cost $ 11,616 n/a n/a $ 9,558 $ 6,292<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a 70% n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a 45% n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a 79% n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a 41% n/a n/a n/a<br />
Note: For FY10 and FY11, Eastside Memorial split into two separate high schools. In FY12 the two schools<br />
regrouped back into one entity. Information for those two years can be found on the following page.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 156
Eastside Memorial Global Tech & Green Tech HS<br />
1012 Arthur Stiles . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78721<br />
General Fund<br />
Eastside Memorial<br />
Global Tech HS<br />
Eastside Memorial<br />
Green Tech HS<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2010 FY2011<br />
Actual Actual Actual Actual<br />
Enrollment 202 260 443 405<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 9.08 10.28 12.72 10.44<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.00<br />
Teachers 22.24 25.30 34.82 38.80<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 2.00 7.19 5.90<br />
Educational Aides 0.00 0.90 6.00 9.00<br />
Total 27.32 31.20 51.07 57.20<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2010 FY2011<br />
Audited Audited Audited Audited<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,248,210 $ 2,302,880 $ 3,251,707 $ 3,087,197<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 230,147 20,681 587,241 325,401<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 157,926 62,371 226,837 74,337<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 36,015 70,320 45,966 17,619<br />
Equipment (6600) 508,511 34,588 - 152,002<br />
Total $ 3,180,810 $ 2,490,841 $ 4,111,751 $ 3,656,556<br />
Per Student Cost $ 15,747 $ 9,580 $ 9,282 $ 9,029<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2009 FY2010<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a 82% n/a 74%<br />
Mathematics n/a 46% n/a 50%<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a 75% n/a 87%<br />
Science n/a 39% n/a 59%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 157
4900 Gonzales . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . In-District Charter School<br />
IDEA Allan 6-12<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a n/a 225<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $<br />
-<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,107,129<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,107,129<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 4,921<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 158
1012 Arthur Stiles . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78721 . Susan Galvan, Principal<br />
International High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 217 237 180 136 150<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.98 13.98 10.95 12.95 16.67<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 18.12 16.95 16.44 10.50 9.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.00 0.00<br />
Total 24.12 22.95 22.04 15.50 13.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,489,799 $ 1,270,076 $ 1,222,181 $ 1,357,871 $ 1,293,958<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 6,950 7,516 3,991 4,100 4,100<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 25,391 25,450 43,687 9,765 8,870<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,656 5,148 15,530 4,800 3,200<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,524,797 $ 1,308,190 $ 1,285,389 $ 1,376,536 $ 1,310,128<br />
Per Student Cost $ 7,027 $ 5,520 $ 7,141 $ 10,122 $ 8,734<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 159
1201 Peyton Gin Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78758 . Katherine Ryan, Principal<br />
Lanier High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,525 1,433 1,510 1,671 1,668<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.69 13.00 13.19 18.46 17.06<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 5.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Other Professionals 6.66 9.74 6.40 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 111.42 110.19 114.50 90.50 97.75<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.83 7.42 7.88 6.00 5.00<br />
Educational Aides 14.00 14.50 12.37 12.00 15.00<br />
Total 143.91 144.85 146.16 113.50 122.75<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 9,184,226 $ 9,056,852 $ 8,989,922 $ 9,085,868 $ 9,106,929<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 592,075 596,115 298,936 668,955 660,308<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 298,664 247,416 312,768 224,918 218,672<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 41,014 31,395 41,752 25,000 32,435<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 10,115,979 $ 9,931,778 $ 9,643,378 $ 10,004,741 $ 10,018,344<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,633 $ 6,931 $ 6,386 $ 5,987 $ 6,006<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 74% 79% 80% 82% n/a<br />
Mathematics 50% 55% 61% 68% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 86% 90% 92% 92% n/a<br />
Science 55% 62% 69% 67% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 160
7309 Lazy Creek Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78724 . Stacia Crescenzi, Principal<br />
LASA - Liberal Arts and Science Academy High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 858 870 878 942 927<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.94 15.17 15.39 19.01 17.21<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 57.44 57.35 57.05 49.55 53.85<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 3.08 4.14 5.00 5.00<br />
Educational Aides 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Total 63.45 64.43 64.91 57.55 61.85<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,019,701 $ 4,181,375 $ 4,259,576 $ 4,148,774 $ 4,299,378<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 26,049 33,273 36,298 20,000 25,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 49,461 102,239 128,296 39,345 43,464<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 15,669 28,134 40,303 18,411 18,861<br />
Equipment (6600) - - 8,043 - -<br />
Total $ 4,110,880 $ 4,345,020 $ 4,472,516 $ 4,226,530 $ 4,386,703<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,791 $ 4,994 $ 5,094 $ 4,487 $ 4,732<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 100% 99% >99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 99% 99% 100% >99% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 100% 100% 100% >99% n/a<br />
Science 99% 98% 100% >99% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 161
7309 Lazy Creek Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78724 . Sheila Henry, Principal<br />
LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 0 977 952 909 929<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 0.00 13.70 13.38 15.09 15.61<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 0.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 5.68 4.11 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 0.00 71.34 71.16 60.25 59.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 0.00 4.34 5.17 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 0.00 11.96 12.00 10.00 9.00<br />
Total 0.00 97.31 97.45 79.25 76.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 6,303,404 $ 6,487,460 $ 6,513,528 $ 6,281,957 $ 6,210,913<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 521,241 519,716 342,574 615,194 597,446<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 210,584 293,391 146,047 114,859 145,918<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 55,752 42,441 26,758 20,100 12,786<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 7,090,981 $ 7,343,007 $ 7,028,907 $ 7,032,110 $ 6,967,063<br />
Per Student Cost $ 7,042 $ 7,516 $ 7,383 $ 7,736 $ 7,500<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 73% 72% 78% 76% n/a<br />
Mathematics 48% 35% 55% 61% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 76% 76% 85% 89% n/a<br />
Science 54% 39% 58% 74% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 162
5600 Sunshine Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78756 . Michael Garrison, Principal<br />
McCallum High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,703 1,751 1,775 1,762 1,766<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.88 16.28 15.47 17.57 17.71<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 5.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 6.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 3.98 0.85 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 107.24 107.56 114.77 100.30 99.73<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 7.67 9.08 7.96 6.00 6.00<br />
Educational Aides 15.00 14.84 13.59 11.00 11.00<br />
Total 134.91 137.46 142.16 122.30 122.73<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 8,865,650 $ 9,253,808 $ 8,970,499 $ 8,962,219 $ 9,073,489<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 435,498 429,754 245,905 486,050 488,823<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 287,142 449,371 368,054 224,421 212,979<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 33,255 35,109 19,764 16,988 12,588<br />
Equipment (6600) 5,666 7,559 18,874 - -<br />
Total $ 9,627,211 $ 10,175,601 $ 9,623,096 $ 9,689,678 $ 9,787,879<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,653 $ 5,811 $ 5,421 $ 5,499 $ 5,542<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 89% 90% 92% 90% n/a<br />
Mathematics 74% 79% 84% 83% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 92% 95% 97% 95% n/a<br />
Science 79% 83% 88% 87% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 163
1201 Peyton Gin Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78758 . In-District Charter School<br />
Premier High School at Lanier<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a 0 120<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $<br />
-<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a 511,756<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 511,756<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 4,265<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 164
1211 East Oltorf . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . In-District Charter School<br />
Premier High School at Travis<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a 0 120<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $<br />
-<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a 511,756<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 511,756<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 4,265<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 165
7104 Berkman Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78752 . Anabel Garza, Principal<br />
Reagan High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 885 866 806 1,024 1,038<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.37 11.43 10.17 18.12 15.80<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.77 2.72 4.14 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 77.85 75.75 79.27 56.50 65.70<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 8.41 12.03 10.05 6.00 6.00<br />
Educational Aides 15.00 13.00 13.00 9.00 8.00<br />
Total 108.03 108.50 111.47 75.50 84.70<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 6,612,332 $ 7,115,084 $ 6,167,326 $ 6,217,317 $ 6,342,371<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 568,749 436,416 373,146 669,890 659,333<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 177,353 157,121 313,861 147,128 196,088<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 28,677 30,334 39,985 10,137 22,231<br />
Equipment (6600) - 10,779 17,655 - -<br />
Total $ 7,387,112 $ 7,749,733 $ 6,911,973 $ 7,044,472 $ 7,220,023<br />
Per Student Cost $ 8,347 $ 8,949 $ 8,576 $ 6,879 $ 6,956<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 63% 74% 80% 80% n/a<br />
Mathematics 33% 38% 61% 66% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 68% 82% 94% 90% n/a<br />
Science 40% 42% 68% 67% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 166
1211 East Oltorf . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Ty Davidson, Principal<br />
Travis High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,405 1,332 1,339 1,473 1,521<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.39 12.43 12.56 17.75 16.44<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 5.00 2.74 5.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.66 6.13 2.12 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 113.41 107.18 106.65 83.00 92.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 11.50 11.00 10.79 6.00 6.00<br />
Educational Aides 22.00 18.00 16.93 14.00 16.00<br />
Total 155.57 145.05 141.49 108.00 119.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 9,022,918 $ 8,921,391 $ 8,105,012 $ 8,759,260 $ 8,805,939<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 604,136 567,211 359,697 685,281 686,010<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 253,002 243,490 253,461 168,594 189,442<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 30,956 45,509 30,747 14,707 16,756<br />
Equipment (6600) - 11,995 - - -<br />
Total $ 9,911,012 $ 9,789,597 $ 8,748,917 $ 9,627,842 $ 9,698,147<br />
Per Student Cost $ 7,054 $ 7,350 $ 6,534 $ 2,374 $ 6,376<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 72% 79% 82% 81% n/a<br />
Mathematics 51% 60% 66% 69% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 82% 87% 94% 91% n/a<br />
Science 55% 61% 71% 72% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 167
le<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Middle Schools<br />
Bailey Middle School<br />
Bedichek Middle School<br />
Burnet Middle School<br />
Covington Middle School<br />
Dobie Middle School<br />
Fulmore Middle School<br />
Garcia Middle School<br />
Gorzycki Middle School<br />
Kealing Middle School<br />
Lamar Middle School<br />
Martin Middle School<br />
Mendez Middle School<br />
Murchison Middle School<br />
O. Henry Middle School<br />
Paredes Middle School<br />
Pearce Middle School<br />
Small Middle School<br />
Webb Middle School<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 168
4020 Lost Oasis Hollow . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78739 . Julia Fletcher, Principal<br />
Bailey Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,203 956 1,035 988 973<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.25 15.48 15.72 16.04 16.33<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 2.12 2.29 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 74.03 61.77 65.85 61.60 59.60<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.64 2.62 4.09 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.00 9.00 9.00 5.00 7.00<br />
Total 90.67 75.51 81.23 73.60 73.60<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,682,558 $ 5,101,512 $ 5,070,278 $ 5,317,883 $ 5,265,974<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 215,343 221,175 156,001 250,339 254,683<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 127,960 98,092 91,389 84,322 75,304<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 24,628 7,342 14,303 3,500 3,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 6,050,489 $ 5,428,122 $ 5,331,971 $ 5,656,044 $ 5,599,461<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,030 $ 5,678 $ 5,152 $ 5,725 $ 5,755<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 98% 95% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 94% 94% 90% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 99% 97% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies 97% 98% 100% 99% n/a<br />
Science 87% 91% 92% 89% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 169
6800 Bill Hughes Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78745 . Daniel Diehl, Principal<br />
Bedichek Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,115 1,021 1,052 1,026 1,051<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.05 12.57 14.02 14.76 15.23<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.90 3.90 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.57 1.68 2.67 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 85.43 81.19 75.03 69.50 69.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 7.06 6.17 4.48 3.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 11.00 11.96 10.50 8.00 8.00<br />
Total 108.06 104.01 96.58 84.40 84.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 6,541,245 $ 6,343,951 $ 5,863,961 $ 6,328,658 $ 6,118,016<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 311,889 293,582 160,530 309,999 310,331<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 164,620 132,681 69,290 101,255 99,764<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 17,714 13,420 9,951 - 1,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 7,035,468 $ 6,783,634 $ 6,103,732 $ 6,739,912 $ 6,529,111<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,310 $ 6,644 $ 5,802 $ 6,569 $ 6,212<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 84% 86% 81% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 72% 73% 77% 73% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 88% 91% 89% n/a<br />
Social Studies 85% 89% 93% 91% n/a<br />
Science 54% 53% 66% 57% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 170
8401 Hathaway . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78757 . Cesar Martinez, Principal<br />
Burnet Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 917 960 994 1,030 1,048<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.85 12.97 13.66 16.09 15.88<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 5.06 4.00 4.27 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 77.40 74.03 72.75 64.00 66.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.26 3.32 6.41 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 14.00 11.00 13.00 10.00 8.00<br />
Total 103.72 95.36 99.42 81.00 81.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,897,999 $ 5,723,573 $ 5,692,507 $ 5,372,956 $ 5,454,700<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 304,736 270,398 123,666 330,584 322,635<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 158,784 144,978 95,357 62,531 68,810<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 25,153 17,955 11,574 8,500 14,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 6,386,672 $ 6,156,904 $ 5,923,104 $ 5,774,571 $ 5,860,145<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,965 $ 6,413 $ 5,959 $ 5,606 $ 5,592<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 78% 74% 67% 71% n/a<br />
Mathematics 65% 63% 64% 72% n/a<br />
Writing 72% 79% 77% 79% n/a<br />
Social Studies 70% 73% 82% 90% n/a<br />
Science 49% 48% 49% 53% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 171
3700 Convict Hill Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Candace Hughes, Principal<br />
Covington Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 954 951 807 732 700<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.11 14.66 13.26 13.94 14.08<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 67.62 64.88 60.85 52.50 49.70<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.50 4.60 3.56 4.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.90 9.50 8.00 5.00 6.00<br />
Total 87.03 81.98 75.40 64.50 61.70<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,467,399 $ 5,344,375 $ 4,818,342 $ 4,683,903 $ 4,735,762<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 356,703 515,326 292,796 351,712 360,306<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 123,734 112,001 68,193 78,176 67,935<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,519 5,179 8,932 - -<br />
Equipment (6600) - 6,000 - - -<br />
Total $ 5,954,355 $ 5,982,880 $ 5,188,263 $ 5,113,791 $ 5,164,003<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,241 $ 6,291 $ 6,429 $ 6,986 $ 7,377<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 90% 90% 86% 87% n/a<br />
Mathematics 79% 80% 83% 80% n/a<br />
Writing 89% 94% 89% 91% n/a<br />
Social Studies 84% 89% 91% 87% n/a<br />
Science 59% 65% 68% 75% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 172
Dobie Middle School<br />
1200 E. Rundberg Lane. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78753 . Carol Chapman, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 570 597 615 666 741<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.85 12.77 13.03 16.44 15.71<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 5.00 4.36 4.46 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 48.10 46.73 47.19 40.50 47.17<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.70 5.00 5.12 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.00 8.00 7.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 70.80 67.09 66.78 52.50 60.17<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,428,189 $ 4,333,522 $ 4,219,989 $ 4,106,888 $ 4,730,592<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 345,936 309,163 154,476 325,623 321,183<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 58,551 74,551 71,825 42,324 52,583<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 18,804 8,131 18,976 7,000 12,250<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,851,481 $ 4,725,367 $ 4,465,265 $ 4,481,835 $ 5,116,608<br />
Per Student Cost $ 8,511 $ 7,915 $ 7,261 $ 6,729 $ 6,905<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 82% 82% 74% 76% n/a<br />
Mathematics 73% 75% 74% 75% n/a<br />
Writing 80% 89% 88% 86% n/a<br />
Social Studies 82% 72% 93% 82% n/a<br />
Science 53% 49% 59% 66% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 173
201 East Mary . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Lisa Bush, Principal<br />
Fulmore Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,040 1,010 990 1,043 1,040<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.74 13.89 13.62 15.92 15.41<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 4.00 3.05 4.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 2.95 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 70.55 72.70 72.67 65.50 67.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.26 5.10 5.53 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 6.00 6.94 6.00 7.00<br />
Total 89.81 89.80 91.14 79.50 82.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,755,395 $ 5,746,979 $ 5,646,925 $ 5,323,305 $ 5,449,176<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 304,696 276,793 154,704 321,146 319,163<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 129,521 98,033 90,825 76,379 80,542<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 25,169 19,784 13,532 15,310 13,445<br />
Equipment (6600) - - 12,698 - -<br />
Total $ 6,214,782 $ 6,141,589 $ 5,918,683 $ 5,736,140 $ 5,862,326<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,976 $ 6,081 $ 5,978 $ 5,500 $ 5,637<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 86% 86% 81% 80% n/a<br />
Mathematics 72% 70% 75% 73% n/a<br />
Writing 84% 89% 84% 88% n/a<br />
Social Studies 85% 90% 93% 93% n/a<br />
Science 58% 64% 70% 71% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 174
7414 Johnny Morris Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78724 . Manuel Ornales, Principal<br />
Garcia Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 656 693 662 421 513<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.07 10.66 10.92 10.02 14.41<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.36 1.00 3.07 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 54.34 65.01 60.63 42.00 35.60<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 4.89 6.79 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 9.00 9.00 5.00 4.00<br />
Total 71.71 82.90 82.49 54.00 46.60<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,829,892 $ 4,994,727 $ 4,756,937 $ 4,279,999 $ 4,139,002<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 311,929 240,939 103,122 344,481 338,996<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 123,605 73,250 35,833 37,964 45,971<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 21,173 11,462 3,689 - 12,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 5,286,599 $ 5,320,378 $ 4,899,581 $ 4,662,444 $ 4,535,969<br />
Per Student Cost n/a $ 7,677 $ 7,401 $ 11,075 $ 8,842<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 72% 66% 72% 70% n/a<br />
Mathematics 35% 50% 61% 65% n/a<br />
Writing 75% 78% 82% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies 48% 63% 85% 79% n/a<br />
Science 19% 32% 38% 52% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 175
7412 Slaughter Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Vickie Bauerle, Principal<br />
Gorzycki Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 0 834 963 1,077 1,090<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 0.00 15.58 14.96 17.47 16.11<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 0.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 0.00 53.54 64.36 61.65 67.65<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 0.00 6.00 4.14 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 0.00 9.00 9.60 6.00 8.00<br />
Total 0.00 71.54 81.10 74.65 82.65<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) 3,993 $ 4,553,760 $ 4,957,949 $ 4,490,588 $ 4,560,596<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 3,993 385,081 171,932 114,831 110,598<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 43,277 283,087 117,582 72,664 98,149<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,656 1,984 7,092 4,000 4,200<br />
Equipment (6600) - 50,786 - - -<br />
Total $ 55,918 $ 5,274,697 $ 5,254,555 $ 4,682,083 $ 4,773,543<br />
Per Student Cost $ - $ 6,325 $ 5,456 $ 4,347 $ 4,379<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a 97% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a 94% 95% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a 98% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a 99% >99% n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a 95% 96% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 176
1607 Pennsylvania Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Robin Lowe, Principal<br />
Kealing Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,260 1,240 1,223 1,215 1,205<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.22 13.36 13.69 14.84 14.46<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 4.00 2.50 4.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.74 4.23 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 88.58 92.80 89.37 81.90 83.35<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.08 2.19 2.34 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 7.00 5.00 5.94 5.00 6.00<br />
Total 105.39 106.72 103.64 94.90 97.35<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 6,764,300 $ 6,973,340 $ 6,634,225 $ 6,411,580 $ 6,407,565<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 332,117 334,561 182,323 378,330 377,510<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 171,274 133,412 103,080 95,244 97,401<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 28,799 18,997 23,812 7,951 15,300<br />
Equipment (6600) 8,795 - - - -<br />
Total $ 7,305,285 $ 7,460,309 $ 6,943,441 $ 6,893,105 $ 6,897,776<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,798 $ 6,016 $ 5,677 $ 5,673 $ 5,724<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 93% 93% 91% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 87% 87% 86% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 94% 95% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies 91% 90% 92% 94% n/a<br />
Science 83% 84% 85% 81% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 177
6201 Wynona . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78757 . George Llewellyn, Principal<br />
Lamar Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 780 663 598 564 599<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.97 12.27 11.47 13.72 13.37<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 2.14 2.14 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 55.83 54.03 52.14 41.10 44.80<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.93 5.77 6.18 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 8.00 10.83 7.00 9.00<br />
Total 68.76 69.94 71.29 55.10 60.80<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,582,017 $ 4,694,071 $ 4,482,645 $ 4,036,748 $ 4,065,291<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 283,370 255,624 139,660 273,062 276,032<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 112,385 72,685 66,863 50,595 51,210<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,413 4,527 2,133 - -<br />
Equipment (6600) 6,512 - 5,359 - -<br />
Total $ 4,987,696 $ 5,026,907 $ 4,696,661 $ 4,360,405 $ 4,392,533<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,394 $ 7,582 $ 7,854 $ 7,731 $ 7,333<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 91% 90% 87% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 75% 76% 79% 82% n/a<br />
Writing 88% 88% 94% 91% n/a<br />
Social Studies 83% 85% 93% 92% n/a<br />
Science 60% 73% 74% 61% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 178
1601 Haskell . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Leticia Vega, Principal<br />
Martin Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 746 677 646 598 534<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.67 11.67 11.40 13.75 14.43<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.00 2.64 2.68 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 58.87 57.99 56.67 43.50 37.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.14 7.14 6.99 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.00 7.00 9.00 6.00 7.00<br />
Total 79.01 77.26 78.34 56.50 51.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,523,661 $ 4,540,990 $ 4,328,462 $ 4,106,899 $ 4,037,719<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 158,024 262,738 115,128 216,888 220,676<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 97,165 69,896 64,014 41,404 32,055<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 25,121 27,227 20,177 11,780 8,750<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,803,971 $ 4,900,850 $ 4,527,781 $ 4,376,971 $ 4,299,200<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,440 $ 7,239 $ 7,009 $ 7,319 $ 8,051<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 81% 79% 72% 75% n/a<br />
Mathematics 67% 69% 67% 71% n/a<br />
Writing 77% 81% 77% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies 73% 83% 82% 82% n/a<br />
Science 54% 45% 54% 61% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 179
5106 Village Square . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Ron Gonzales, Principal<br />
Mendez Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 888 865 879 999 1,041<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.87 12.05 13.07 17.84 16.11<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 4.50 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 74.79 71.78 67.28 56.00 64.60<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.15 5.01 5.11 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.85 10.00 6.00 7.00 7.00<br />
Total 97.29 93.78 86.39 70.00 78.60<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,721,812 $ 5,685,049 $ 5,166,200 $ 5,378,438 $ 5,967,029<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 289,880 315,089 311,588 315,733 305,652<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 103,272 85,955 55,971 54,155 98,759<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 8,356 6,282 5,037 2,000 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 6,123,320 $ 6,092,374 $ 5,538,795 $ 5,750,326 $ 6,371,440<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,896 $ 7,043 $ 6,301 $ 5,756 $ 6,120<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 78% 72% 65% 69% n/a<br />
Mathematics 60% 53% 62% 68% n/a<br />
Writing 76% 80% 77% 79% n/a<br />
Social Studies 84% 86% 89% 91% n/a<br />
Science 53% 57% 50% 53% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 180
3700 North Hills Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78731 . Sammilu Harrison, Principal<br />
Murchison Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,161 1,244 1,274 1,360 1,383<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.57 15.57 14.66 16.79 16.27<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.00 1.94 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 74.56 79.91 86.88 81.00 85.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 6.00 4.11 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 14.95 13.00 14.68 11.00 12.00<br />
Total 99.52 102.91 110.61 99.00 105.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 6,049,548 $ 6,485,650 $ 6,341,391 $ 6,145,897 $ 6,296,845<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 241,727 250,548 131,074 283,945 287,127<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 160,315 117,166 130,052 105,811 118,215<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 24,152 12,357 15,111 7,500 1,255<br />
Equipment (6600) 11,110 1,200 - - -<br />
Total $ 6,486,852 $ 6,866,922 $ 6,617,629 $ 6,543,153 $ 6,703,442<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,587 $ 5,520 $ 5,194 $ 4,811 $ 4,847<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 97% 97% 96% 94% n/a<br />
Mathematics 92% 92% 94% 92% n/a<br />
Writing 95% 98% 95% 96% n/a<br />
Social Studies 97% 97% 99% 97% n/a<br />
Science 84% 86% 85% 86% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 181
2610 West 10 th Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78703 . Peter Price, Principal<br />
O. Henry Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 974 1,004 1,026 1,028 1,037<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.43 15.39 15.06 17.42 17.21<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 3.50 1.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 63.14 65.22 68.11 59.00 60.25<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.47 4.25 3.60 4.00 5.50<br />
Educational Aides 8.96 6.94 7.00 5.00 7.00<br />
Total 82.07 81.90 83.21 71.00 75.75<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,165,839 $ 5,333,676 $ 5,133,536 $ 4,416,579 $ 4,376,006<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 220,890 220,475 118,763 238,542 240,103<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 111,682 95,658 100,126 78,333 84,867<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 8,024 837 2,200 3,500 3,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - 12,000 - - -<br />
Total $ 5,506,436 $ 5,662,645 $ 5,354,625 $ 4,736,954 $ 4,703,976<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,653 $ 5,640 $ 5,219 $ 4,608 $ 4,536<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 94% 93% 91% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 89% 87% 86% 89% n/a<br />
Writing 91% 96% 95% 94% n/a<br />
Social Studies 93% 92% 97% 95% n/a<br />
Science 79% 76% 75% 84% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 182
10100 South Mary Moore Searight Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . Karla Wright, Principal<br />
Paredes Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 947 889 933 1,032 1,086<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.53 13.99 14.71 17.64 16.49<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 2.00 3.96 3.00 3.50<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 4.00 0.54 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 65.19 63.56 63.42 58.50 65.86<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.50 4.11 4.75 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 11.00 8.00 8.50 6.00 6.00<br />
Total 86.69 81.67 81.18 71.50 79.36<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 5,347,186 $ 5,224,947 $ 5,102,078 $ 5,415,081 $ 5,364,676<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 193,909 190,162 118,341 216,815 222,364<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 136,810 78,350 61,286 77,611 87,623<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 20,592 10,031 11,831 7,500 7,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 5,698,497 $ 5,503,490 $ 5,293,535 $ 5,717,007 $ 5,682,163<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,017 $ 6,191 $ 5,674 $ 5,540 $ 5,232<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 87% 88% 83% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 77% 80% 81% 81% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 90% 89% 89% n/a<br />
Social Studies 91% 94% 95% 93% n/a<br />
Science 60% 62% 72% 65% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 183
6401 North Hampton . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Texana Turner, Principal<br />
Pearce Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 519 457 329 544 563<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.20 9.29 9.59 16.24 14.22<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.37 4.89 2.90 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 50.89 49.19 34.29 33.50 39.60<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 4.19 6.94 4.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 11.88 6.00 4.00 6.00 4.00<br />
Total 75.13 65.28 52.14 46.50 50.60<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,378,666 $ 4,694,094 $ 3,003,609 $ 4,644,029 $ 3,455,679<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 336,373 291,784 124,681 312,897 312,541<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 77,629 40,223 124,347 30,774 33,749<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 24,728 11,107 5,010 2,377 5,378<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,817,395 $ 5,037,207 $ 3,257,647 $ 4,990,077 $ 3,807,347<br />
Per Student Cost $ 9,282 $ 11,022 $ 9,902 $ 9,173 $ 6,763<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 67% 72% 67% 71% n/a<br />
Mathematics 58% 64% 71% 63% n/a<br />
Writing 60% 82% 84% 84% n/a<br />
Social Studies 66% 71% 84% 79% n/a<br />
Science 31% 39% 45% 48% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 184
Small Middle School<br />
4801 Monterey Oaks Boulevard. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Amy Taylor, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,183 949 951 925 955<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.89 14.89 14.82 16.23 15.92<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 2.17 3.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 74.43 63.75 64.18 57.00 60.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.17 6.12 4.42 4.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 16.00 11.00 10.94 11.00 10.00<br />
Total 98.60 84.21 81.71 75.00 77.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 6,092,297 $ 5,353,965 $ 5,020,802 $ 5,463,128 $ 5,302,774<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 218,309 201,302 130,138 236,986 241,209<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 128,135 83,634 147,069 65,798 78,727<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 23,020 7,716 14,908 800 800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - 5,000 - -<br />
Total $ 6,461,760 $ 5,646,616 $ 5,317,917 $ 5,766,712 $ 5,623,510<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,462 $ 5,950 $ 5,592 $ 6,234 $ 5,888<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 97% 97% 94% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 95% 94% 91% 87% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 97% 95% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies 95% 98% 98% 95% n/a<br />
Science 81% 89% 91% 84% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 185
601 East St. Johns . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78752 . Rey Garcia, Principal<br />
Webb Middle School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 519 572 580 662 735<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.83 11.48 10.77 15.40 15.47<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00<br />
Other Professionals 8.00 7.00 5.79 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 47.92 49.84 53.85 43.00 47.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.89 4.63 5.29 3.00 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 4.96 5.74 6.00 6.00<br />
Total 68.81 69.43 73.66 55.00 61.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,932,759 $ 4,198,915 $ 4,513,031 $ 4,078,754 $ 4,558,658<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 294,498 264,036 113,662 221,311 222,562<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 97,424 72,182 82,669 46,308 53,463<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 16,519 17,570 8,870 3,000 11,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,341,201 $ 4,552,703 $ 4,718,231 $ 4,349,373 $ 4,845,683<br />
Per Student Cost $ 8,365 $ 7,959 $ 8,135 $ 6,570 $ 6,593<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 75% 76% 69% 74% n/a<br />
Mathematics 64% 65% 73% 79% n/a<br />
Writing 77% 82% 81% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies 83% 79% 93% 93% n/a<br />
Science 42% 62% 53% 68% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 186
A<strong>ISD</strong> Elementary Schools<br />
D Elemery Schools<br />
Allan Pre-K Center<br />
Lee Elementary<br />
Allison Elementary<br />
Andrews Elementary<br />
Baldwin Elementary<br />
Baranoff Elementary<br />
Barrington Elementary<br />
Barton Hills Elementary<br />
Becker Elementary<br />
Blackshear Elementary<br />
Blanton Elementary<br />
Blazier Elementary<br />
Boone Elementary<br />
Brentwood Elementary<br />
Brooke Elementary<br />
Brown Elementary<br />
Bryker Woods Elementary<br />
Campbell Elementary<br />
Casey Elementary<br />
Casis Elementary<br />
Clayton Elementary<br />
Cook Elementary<br />
Cowan Elementary<br />
Cunningham Elementary<br />
Davis Elementary<br />
Dawson Elementary<br />
Dobie Pre-K Center<br />
Doss Elementary<br />
Galindo Elementary<br />
Govalle Elementary<br />
Graham Elementary<br />
Gullett Elementary<br />
Harris Elementary<br />
Hart Elementary<br />
Highland Park Elementary<br />
Hill Elementary<br />
Houston Elementary<br />
IDEA Allan K-5 (In-District Charter School)<br />
Jordan Elementary<br />
Joslin Elementary<br />
Kiker Elementary<br />
Kocurek Elementary<br />
Langford Elementary<br />
Linder Elementary<br />
Maplewood Elementary<br />
Mathews Elementary<br />
McBee Elementary<br />
Menchaca Elementary<br />
Metz Elementary<br />
Mills Elementary<br />
Norman Elementary<br />
Oak Hill Elementary<br />
Oak Springs Elementary<br />
Odom Elementary<br />
Ortega Elementary<br />
Overton Elementary<br />
Palm Elementary<br />
Patton Elementary<br />
Pease Elementary<br />
Pecan Springs Elementary<br />
Perez Elementary<br />
Pickle Elementary<br />
Pillow Elementary<br />
Pleasant Hill Elementary<br />
Read Pre-K Demonstration School<br />
Reilly Elementary<br />
Ridgetop Elementary<br />
Rodriguez Elementary<br />
Sanchez Elementary<br />
Sims Elementary<br />
St. Elmo Elementary<br />
Summit Elementary<br />
Sunset Valley Elementary<br />
Travis Heights Elementary<br />
Uphaus Early Childhood Center<br />
Walnut Creek Elementary<br />
Webb Primary Center<br />
Widen Elementary<br />
Williams Elementary<br />
Winn Elementary<br />
Wooldridge Elementary<br />
Wooten Elementary<br />
Zavala Elementary<br />
Zilker Elementary<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 187
4900 Gonzales . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Yolanda Capuchino, Administrative Supervisor<br />
Allan Pre-K Center<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 384 388 379 365 58<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.24 12.45 11.80 15.21 14.50<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 0.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 1.90 1.89 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 31.38 31.17 32.11 24.00 4.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.10 2.10 2.95 3.00 0.00<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 2.00<br />
Total 41.48 40.67 42.95 31.50 6.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,436,586 $ 2,573,614 $ 2,397,093 $ 2,473,785 $ 344,776<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 134,618 128,832 82,334 219,792 41,531<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 35,574 23,476 15,819 18,889 15,667<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 9,209 5,292 2,897 2,000 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,615,987 $ 2,731,215 $ 2,498,143 $ 2,714,466 $ 401,974<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,812 $ 7,039 $ 6,591 $ 7,437 $ 6,931<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 78% 81% 73% 80% n/a<br />
Mathematics 80% 79% 77% 80% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 80% 84% 83% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 51% 64% 68% 70% n/a<br />
Note: In FY13 Allan Elementary changed the Allan Pre-K Center.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 188
515 Vargas Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78741 . Guadalupe Velasquez, Principal<br />
Allison Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 512 529 555 527 536<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.96 13.69 13.59 16.22 14.68<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 1.24 1.60 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 39.50 38.63 40.83 32.50 36.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 4.00 3.58 4.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00<br />
Total 46.50 46.37 50.00 39.00 43.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,824,570 $ 2,832,675 $ 2,540,462 $ 3,096,501 $ 3,061,610<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 93,574 90,708 42,454 131,882 123,370<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 40,845 18,370 10,166 15,720 10,682<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 7,906 6,718 2,335 - 300<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,966,895 $ 2,948,472 $ 2,595,418 $ 3,244,103 $ 3,195,962<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,795 $ 5,574 $ 4,676 $ 6,156 $ 5,963<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 82% 85% 87% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 76% 77% 81% 83% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 91% 86% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 48% 67% 67% 71% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 189
6801 Northeast Dr. . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Laurie Barber, Principal<br />
Andrews Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 620 572 701 715 723<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.68 13.88 13.74 16.25 15.72<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.85 1.25 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 45.33 41.22 51.02 44.00 46.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 4.39 4.19 3.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 3.96 4.47 5.00 2.00 4.00<br />
Total 55.29 52.93 62.96 51.50 54.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,113,848 $ 3,104,594 $ 3,242,477 $ 3,587,448 $ 3,543,015<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 108,542 99,160 55,077 120,162 126,004<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 68,701 28,560 43,186 41,306 39,451<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,378 1,778 5,184 4,800 4,900<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,294,468 $ 3,234,091 $ 3,345,925 $ 3,753,716 $ 3,713,370<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,314 $ 5,654 $ 4,773 $ 5,250 $ 5,136<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 81% 90% 92% 90% n/a<br />
Mathematics 76% 87% 84% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 79% 88% 92% 94% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 67% 83% 88% 73% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 190
Baldwin Elementary School<br />
12200 Meridian Park Blvd. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78739 . Rosa Pena, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 0 0 506 650 681<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.70 15.84<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 0.00 0.00 33.37 33.00 43.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 39.37 38.00 49.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ - $ 271,227 $ 2,437,519 $ 2,507,484 $ 1,789,654<br />
Contracted Services (6200) - 50,909 105,105 252,523 252,190<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) - 36,424 93,297 28,336 34,391<br />
Other Expenses (6400) - 270 5,237 3,800 6,300<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ - $ 358,829 $ 2,641,158 $ 2,792,143 $ 2,082,535<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 3,058<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a 96% n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a 95% n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a 97% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a 86% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 191
12009 Buckingham Gate Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Linda Purvis, Principal<br />
Baranoff Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 854 852 873 955 984<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 17.43 17.06 17.18 19.49 17.57<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 49.00 49.93 50.81 49.00 56.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 2.00 2.57 2.00 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 2.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 3.00<br />
Total 55.50 54.43 55.87 54.50 64.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,442,827 $ 3,603,551 $ 3,532,274 $ 3,653,288 $ 3,253,951<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 128,717 116,716 72,149 133,839 135,072<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 68,167 49,675 52,502 44,141 47,979<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,226 1,257 658 2,000 3,250<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,643,937 $ 3,771,200 $ 3,657,584 $ 3,833,268 $ 3,440,252<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,267 $ 4,426 $ 4,190 $ 4,014 $ 3,496<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 98% 98% 98% 97% n/a<br />
Mathematics 95% 97% 98% 97% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 97% 99% 97% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 91% 94% 96% 95% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 192
400 Cooper Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78753 . Gilma Sanchez, Principal<br />
Barrington Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 871 926 994 1,104 774<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.68 14.34 14.86 19.20 16.47<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 5.00 4.17 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 59.34 64.56 66.91 57.50 47.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.34 5.00 5.46 7.50 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.00 10.00 10.00 7.00 4.00<br />
Total 78.68 86.56 89.04 74.50 55.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,102,369 $ 4,550,166 $ 4,318,463 $ 4,732,405 $ 3,910,241<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 163,691 175,874 89,559 188,609 184,317<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 115,169 111,142 56,892 73,606 52,485<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,591 4,853 26,637 2,300 3,000<br />
Equipment (6600) 1,016 - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,383,836 $ 4,842,035 $ 4,491,550 $ 4,996,920 $ 4,150,043<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,033 $ 5,229 $ 4,519 $ 4,526 $ 5,362<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 79% 74% 73% 82% n/a<br />
Mathematics 75% 76% 81% 90% n/a<br />
Writing 86% 73% 89% 85% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 55% 70% 69% 80% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 193
2108 Barton Hills Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Kati Achtermann, Principal<br />
Barton Hills Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 372 375 388 391 377<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.88 15.00 14.54 15.64 14.56<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 25.00 25.00 26.68 25.00 25.90<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 2.50 3.38 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.41 5.00 2.00 0.00 1.25<br />
Total 33.91 33.50 34.06 28.50 30.65<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,105,787 $ 2,114,854 $ 2,155,658 $ 1,930,599 $ 1,996,182<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 73,157 77,632 42,631 84,368 84,312<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 39,450 21,877 18,340 12,861 13,644<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 685 374 506 1,000 700<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,219,079 $ 2,214,738 $ 2,217,135 $ 2,028,828 $ 2,094,838<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,965 $ 5,906 $ 5,714 $ 5,189 $ 5,557<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 98% 98% 98% >99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 95% 98% 94% 98% n/a<br />
Writing 100% 98% 100% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 98% 93% 98% 96% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 194
906 West Milton . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . La Kesha Drinks, Principal<br />
Becker Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 192 189 208 280 306<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.38 11.19 13.64 16.00 14.57<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 18.50 16.89 15.25 17.50 21.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 3.00 3.23 2.00 2.76<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Total 26.50 24.89 20.56 22.50 26.76<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,683,644 $ 1,483,836 $ 1,414,857 $ 1,727,239 $ 1,705,748<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 94,413 85,326 41,064 110,446 104,842<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 39,759 15,984 12,667 9,354 13,383<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,462 2,961 717 1,500 3,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,820,278 $ 1,588,107 $ 1,469,305 $ 1,848,539 $ 1,827,473<br />
Per Student Cost $ 9,481 $ 8,403 $ 7,064 $ 6,602 $ 5,972<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 68% 74% 95% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics 67% 68% 93% >99% n/a<br />
Writing 75% 76% 87% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 76% 54% 94% >99% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 195
1712 East 11 th Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Betty Jenkins, Principal<br />
Blackshear Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 265 241 247 239 238<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.13 11.77 12.53 11.95 12.53<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 1.50 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 18.75 20.48 19.71 20.00 19.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 2.50 3.12 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 1.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Total 26.68 26.98 26.83 24.00 23.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,693,508 $ 1,620,723 $ 1,502,377 $ 1,874,341 $ 1,815,563<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 115,567 99,305 45,859 103,598 101,719<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 26,653 15,010 7,307 14,355 8,455<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 5,475 1,432 963 1,400 1,625<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,841,202 $ 1,736,471 $ 1,556,506 $ 1,993,694 $ 1,927,362<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,948 $ 7,205 $ 6,302 $ 8,342 $ 8,098<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 91% 86% 93% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 86% 91% 92% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 97% 97% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 76% 65% 70% 90% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 196
5408 Westminster Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Dora Molina, Principal<br />
Blanton Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 536 560 588 580 580<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.61 13.24 13.74 15.06 14.68<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.21 2.28 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 42.49 42.30 42.78 38.50 39.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.40 4.50 3.71 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.99 3.00 5.00 4.00 5.00<br />
Total 52.89 53.02 55.26 46.00 48.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,167,651 $ 3,096,578 $ 3,096,153 $ 3,238,567 $ 3,159,759<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 98,327 96,049 53,429 115,007 116,396<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 75,760 29,990 34,346 26,974 25,970<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 9,245 6,402 9,877 6,500 8,400<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,350,983 $ 3,229,020 $ 3,193,805 $ 3,387,048 $ 3,310,525<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,252 $ 5,766 $ 5,432 $ 5,840 $ 5,708<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 88% 91% 92% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 86% 94% 93% 92% n/a<br />
Writing 96% 100% 96% 94% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 84% 93% 100% 85% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 197
8601 Vertex Boulevard . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Ana Leticia Pena-Wilk, Principal<br />
Blazier Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 607 727 776 854 895<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.99 16.26 15.33 17.25 16.42<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 35.72 44.71 50.63 49.50 54.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.50 4.50 5.45 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 6.00<br />
Total 43.22 55.21 63.08 57.50 65.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,607,282 $ 3,132,279 $ 3,288,988 $ 3,074,649 $ 3,113,846<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 108,182 123,924 126,821 209,152 208,916<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 67,890 53,913 72,452 52,336 40,530<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,639 3,246 3,612 4,400 4,800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,786,994 $ 3,313,361 $ 3,491,873 $ 3,340,537 $ 3,368,092<br />
Per Student Cost n/a $ 4,558 $ 4,500 $ 3,912 $ 3,763<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 82% 80% 88% 94% n/a<br />
Mathematics 73% 76% 88% 91% n/a<br />
Writing 87% 95% 92% 91% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 55% 76% 83% 89% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 198
Boone Elementary School<br />
8101 Croftwood Drive. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Kathleen Noack, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 555 485 501 508 524<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.87 12.78 14.18 14.72 14.16<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 40.00 37.95 35.34 34.50 37.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.50 4.45 3.80 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 7.00 7.00 8.00 6.00 6.00<br />
Total 52.50 51.40 49.14 44.00 46.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,183,660 $ 3,062,841 $ 2,849,321 $ 3,153,820 $ 3,150,491<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 93,684 109,963 55,602 122,651 123,838<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 48,727 28,580 31,736 17,746 20,102<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 754 872 1,168 500 500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,326,826 $ 3,202,256 $ 2,937,828 $ 3,294,717 $ 3,294,931<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,994 $ 6,603 $ 5,864 $ 6,486 $ 6,288<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 93% 95% 99% 97% n/a<br />
Mathematics 91% 93% 96% 97% n/a<br />
Writing 96% 95% 100% 99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 79% 91% 87% 96% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 199
6700 Arroyo Seco . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78757 . Katherine Williams-Carter, Principal<br />
Brentwood Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 447 477 488 518 528<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.98 12.88 12.85 15.18 15.94<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 37.32 37.02 37.98 34.13 33.13<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.65 3.34 2.83 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.88 10.00 7.00 5.00 7.00<br />
Total 52.45 52.11 48.80 42.63 43.63<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,555,088 $ 2,563,383 $ 2,530,591 $ 2,562,547 $ 2,566,207<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 77,364 86,777 47,756 80,448 80,617<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 37,314 27,940 39,131 25,777 34,785<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,471 1,040 5,004 1,100 1,400<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,671,237 $ 2,679,140 $ 2,622,482 $ 2,669,872 $ 2,683,009<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,976 $ 5,617 $ 5,374 $ 5,154 $ 5,081<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 96% 86% 90% 94% n/a<br />
Mathematics 83% 88% 90% 92% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 98% 96% 97% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 58% 76% 83% 88% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 200
3100 East 4 th Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Elia Diaz-Ortiz, Principal<br />
Brooke Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 410 414 433 408 402<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.73 14.25 12.82 13.16 13.63<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 1.50 1.18 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 29.86 29.06 33.77 31.00 29.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 5.00 4.47 3.50 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 7.46 8.50 5.00 3.00<br />
Total 41.86 44.52 49.42 41.00 37.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,521,994 $ 2,586,936 $ 2,526,559 $ 2,548,454 $ 2,483,558<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 71,072 65,886 49,337 83,099 84,903<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 43,491 18,707 19,231 17,914 14,989<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 7,702 4,140 3,954 1,200 200<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,644,260 $ 2,675,669 $ 2,599,081 $ 2,650,667 $ 2,583,650<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,449 $ 6,463 $ 6,002 $ 6,497 $ 6,427<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 89% 86% 86% 85% n/a<br />
Mathematics 90% 85% 80% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 84% 94% 96% 86% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 76% 89% 83% 74% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 201
505 West Anderson . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78752 . Veronica Sharp, Principal<br />
Brown Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 519 502 521 494 482<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.03 13.66 13.45 14.11 13.39<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 2.36 2.41 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 37.00 36.74 38.73 35.00 36.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 3.50 2.89 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 4.00 5.50 4.50 6.00<br />
Total 45.00 48.10 51.04 43.00 45.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,668,676 $ 2,842,257 $ 2,680,537 $ 2,791,921 $ 2,926,620<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 86,819 87,841 49,032 99,118 99,615<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 59,940 35,657 38,764 23,023 19,554<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 13,609 11,466 9,984 11,000 9,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,829,045 $ 2,977,222 $ 2,778,317 $ 2,925,062 $ 3,054,789<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,451 $ 5,931 $ 5,333 $ 5,921 $ 6,338<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 71% 73% 80% 84% n/a<br />
Mathematics 74% 75% 74% 78% n/a<br />
Writing 87% 87% 75% 75% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 53% 52% 76% 68% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 202
3309 Kerbey Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78703 . Jane Kronke, Principal<br />
Bryker Woods Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 400 400 405 379 377<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.24 13.79 15.31 14.86 14.56<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 28.10 29.00 26.46 25.50 25.90<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.50 2.00 2.20 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00<br />
Total 33.10 33.00 31.66 29.00 30.40<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,101,556 $ 2,166,282 $ 2,126,166 $ 2,052,609 $ 2,009,236<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 86,380 89,737 40,837 102,443 103,600<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 48,210 24,284 21,565 19,689 21,011<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,258 2,468 2,129 1,300 2,100<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,240,405 $ 2,282,771 $ 2,190,698 $ 2,176,041 $ 2,135,947<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,601 $ 5,707 $ 5,409 $ 5,742 $ 5,666<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 98% 99% 95% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics 99% 98% 94% 98% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 98% 94% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 100% 92% 98% 88% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 203
2613 Rogers Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78722 . Lisa Bohanan, Principal<br />
Campbell Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 379 393 360 316 316<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.37 13.86 12.00 12.90 12.39<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.50 2.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 26.38 28.35 30.00 24.50 25.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.00 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00<br />
Total 31.38 34.35 38.50 29.00 31.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,945,815 $ 2,161,570 $ 1,999,875 $ 1,937,000 $ 1,945,573<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 88,381 83,332 50,729 103,680 105,653<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 26,762 27,079 29,910 18,221 11,665<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 7,847 6,108 4,515 4,200 9,699<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,068,805 $ 2,278,089 $ 2,085,030 $ 2,063,101 $ 2,072,590<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,459 $ 5,797 $ 5,792 $ 6,529 $ 6,559<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 93% 82% 82% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 93% 76% 81% 81% n/a<br />
Writing 96% 87% 89% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 87% 57% 64% 63% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 204
9400 Texas Oaks Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . Jean Bahney, Principal<br />
Casey Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 665 656 673 643 636<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.00 15.52 15.20 14.61 14.45<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 47.50 42.27 44.28 44.00 44.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 3.00 3.41 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 8.00 8.00 4.00 5.00<br />
Total 55.50 55.27 57.70 52.00 53.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,346,138 $ 3,288,274 $ 3,182,572 $ 3,531,855 $ 3,578,416<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 106,265 82,328 64,572 150,512 153,071<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 44,825 32,314 43,634 29,716 27,060<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,456 489 984 2,000 2,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,498,684 $ 3,403,404 $ 3,291,763 $ 3,714,083 $ 3,760,547<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,261 $ 5,188 $ 4,891 $ 5,776 $ 5,913<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 87% 84% 87% 88% n/a<br />
Mathematics 78% 80% 85% 92% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 85% 83% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 67% 79% 74% 86% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 205
2710 Exposition Boulevard . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78703 . Patricia Martin, Principal<br />
Casis Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 829 815 821 846 857<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.75 15.69 14.89 17.44 16.61<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 1.18 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 49.50 51.94 55.15 48.50 51.58<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.00 6.58 5.65 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 6.00 9.00 5.00 6.00<br />
Total 62.50 66.52 70.97 57.50 61.58<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,568,994 $ 3,850,204 $ 3,844,698 $ 3,547,321 $ 3,540,650<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 172,534 142,177 78,201 184,556 185,490<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 67,543 55,755 32,738 44,352 47,816<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 258 - 23 - -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,809,329 $ 4,048,136 $ 3,955,660 $ 3,776,229 $ 3,773,956<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,595 $ 4,967 $ 4,818 $ 4,464 $ 4,404<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 100% 98% 99% 99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 99% 98% 99% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 99% 97% 98% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 95% 97% 98% 98% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 206
7525 LaCrosse Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78739 . Dru McGovern-Robinett, Principal<br />
Clayton Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 985 970 871 885 873<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.26 16.82 15.80 16.54 16.07<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 60.58 57.66 55.14 53.50 54.33<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.91 4.00 4.38 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.74 11.98 10.00 8.00 8.00<br />
Total 78.24 75.64 71.51 66.00 66.33<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,531,473 $ 4,464,464 $ 4,153,918 $ 5,146,007 $ 4,740,022<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 201,446 204,125 76,468 226,494 230,328<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 115,847 74,023 85,184 52,175 51,416<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,905 4,064 8,901 6,687 7,700<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,851,671 $ 4,746,676 $ 4,324,472 $ 5,431,363 $ 5,029,466<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,926 $ 4,893 $ 4,965 $ 6,137 $ 5,761<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 98% 99% 98% 99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 97% 99% 98% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 95% 97% 95% 99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 92% 95% 94% 97% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 207
1511 Cripple Creek . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78758 . Wendy Mills, Principal<br />
Cook Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 904 900 908 955 965<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.16 15.28 15.58 20.11 16.50<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 2.57 3.94 3.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 55.94 58.89 58.28 47.50 58.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.00 3.00 4.69 5.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.41 4.00 6.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Total 70.92 71.83 74.96 57.00 66.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,959,929 $ 4,156,763 $ 4,131,525 $ 4,043,736 $ 4,052,774<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 155,560 145,748 79,250 160,745 161,631<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 105,221 50,658 25,573 44,196 48,520<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 15,512 14,520 2,565 13,500 13,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,236,222 $ 4,367,688 $ 4,238,912 $ 4,262,177 $ 4,276,425<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,686 $ 4,853 $ 4,668 $ 4,463 $ 4,432<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 77% 82% 87% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 70% 81% 85% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 78% 88% 94% 96% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 56% 70% 85% 68% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 208
2817 Kentish Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . Deborah Warnken, Principal<br />
Cowan Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 704 742 781 790 808<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.38 15.83 16.25 16.99 16.66<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 45.78 46.87 48.05 46.50 48.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 3.00 2.62 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 56.78 56.87 58.67 55.50 57.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,484,410 $ 3,487,429 $ 3,361,043 $ 3,548,456 $ 3,548,169<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 105,281 113,774 66,240 135,921 131,790<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 77,739 53,986 40,138 41,822 42,484<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 5,178 1,472 5,861 2,500 5,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,672,609 $ 3,656,661 $ 3,473,283 $ 3,728,699 $ 3,727,943<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,217 $ 4,928 $ 4,447 $ 4,720 $ 4,614<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 96% 97% 94% 94% n/a<br />
Mathematics 92% 94% 91% 94% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 90% 97% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 90% 90% 95% 92% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 209
2200 Berkeley Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78743 . Amy Lloyd, Principal<br />
Cunningham Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 537 556 513 490 480<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.84 14.51 13.54 13.80 13.33<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.00 1.05 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 38.81 38.32 37.90 35.50 36.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 3.00 4.03 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 7.00<br />
Total 48.81 47.32 47.98 45.00 46.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,995,437 $ 2,900,791 $ 2,765,671 $ 2,852,387 $ 2,872,262<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 100,241 101,533 1,352,702 116,171 116,622<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 46,916 40,100 34,873 24,491 24,872<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,577 1,527 44,242 1,500 1,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,144,171 $ 3,043,951 $ 4,197,488 $ 2,994,549 $ 3,015,256<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,855 $ 5,475 $ 8,182 $ 6,111 $ 6,282<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 88% 87% 86% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 82% 83% 78% 86% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 84% 92% 81% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 84% 89% 87% 83% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 210
5214 Duval Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78727 . Douglas Hall, Principal<br />
Davis Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 620 703 676 687 696<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.55 16.46 15.08 15.44 14.71<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 39.88 42.71 44.83 44.50 47.33<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.13 3.16 4.52 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.00 8.96 7.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 54.00 56.83 58.36 53.50 56.33<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,024,217 $ 3,227,289 $ 3,222,432 $ 2,960,727 $ 2,954,152<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 95,705 100,483 54,629 131,030 133,955<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 43,523 49,931 49,893 29,400 39,872<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 270 315 243 500 200<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,163,715 $ 3,378,019 $ 3,327,197 $ 3,121,657 $ 3,128,179<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,103 $ 4,805 $ 4,922 $ 4,544 $ 4,495<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 96% 97% 97% 96% n/a<br />
Mathematics 92% 94% 92% 95% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 98% 94% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 92% 93% 95% 91% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 211
3001 South 1 st Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Shannon Sellstrom, Principal<br />
Dawson Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 333 333 329 340 342<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 9.79 10.61 10.68 11.15 10.86<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 34.00 31.38 30.80 30.50 31.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 5.00 3.72 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 7.00 9.00 8.00 7.00<br />
Total 47.00 45.38 46.02 42.00 42.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,702,315 $ 2,713,036 $ 2,528,506 $ 2,672,093 $ 2,722,335<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 98,403 100,779 64,078 110,404 112,408<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 26,319 19,427 18,886 16,033 16,478<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,028 6,246 5,285 3,650 3,900<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,831,065 $ 2,839,488 $ 2,616,755 $ 2,802,180 $ 2,855,121<br />
Per Student Cost $ 8,502 $ 8,527 $ 7,954 $ 8,242 $ 8,348<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 93% 91% 95% 96% n/a<br />
Mathematics 87% 92% 91% 95% n/a<br />
Writing 88% 97% 91% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 91% 78% 91% 95% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 212
Dobie Pre-K Center<br />
1200 E. Rundberg Lane. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78753 . Courtney Roberson, Director<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a n/a 270<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a 16.88<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.00<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.00<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a 16.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.50<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 501,745<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a 5,240<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a 8,750<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,150<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 516,885<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 1,914<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 213
7005 Northledge Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78731 . Jana Griffin, Principal<br />
Doss Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 672 721 774 790 816<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.35 15.95 16.59 17.17 15.69<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 43.78 45.22 46.64 46.00 52.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.22 3.50 3.88 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 57.00 57.72 59.52 55.00 61.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,242,074 $ 3,368,371 $ 3,340,366 $ 3,289,370 $ 3,352,557<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 110,301 109,562 58,813 119,873 120,943<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 114,018 46,575 44,949 50,089 48,226<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,274 199 1,895 1,950 3,859<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,468,667 $ 3,524,706 $ 3,446,024 $ 3,461,282 $ 3,525,585<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,162 $ 4,889 $ 4,452 $ 4,381 $ 4,321<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 100% 99% 98% 99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 99% 99% 98% 98% n/a<br />
Writing 100% 100% 97% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 97% 100% 96% 99% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 214
3800 S. 2 nd Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Donna Linn, Principal<br />
Galindo Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 717 719 701 677 676<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.60 12.89 12.74 15.04 14.38<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.74 2.96 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 56.91 55.80 55.03 45.00 47.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 4.00 4.06 4.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 11.00 11.00 9.93 8.00 8.00<br />
Total 74.91 74.54 73.98 59.00 59.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,026,352 $ 4,145,250 $ 3,629,817 $ 4,030,061 $ 3,848,275<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 161,326 167,028 83,454 179,659 181,253<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 80,281 44,161 28,933 35,849 32,903<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,635 2,381 2,462 5,070 6,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,271,594 $ 4,358,820 $ 3,744,665 $ 4,250,639 $ 4,068,931<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,958 $ 6,062 $ 5,342 $ 6,279 $ 6,019<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 87% 93% 92% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 84% 81% 86% 86% n/a<br />
Writing 83% 89% 95% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 69% 79% 76% 89% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 215
3601 Govalle Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Nancy Maniscalco, Principal<br />
Govalle Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 414 402 400 478 587<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.57 12.68 12.79 15.67 14.68<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 1.50 2.04 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 30.50 31.71 31.27 30.50 40.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 5.50 4.71 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Total 43.50 44.21 44.52 38.50 48.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,393,241 $ 2,442,886 $ 2,239,948 $ 2,459,702 $ 2,655,233<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 93,434 79,816 53,703 114,838 118,534<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 49,336 29,781 22,411 23,156 27,451<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,489 1,050 1,630 2,000 4,300<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,538,500 $ 2,553,534 $ 2,317,691 $ 2,599,696 $ 2,805,518<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,132 $ 6,352 $ 5,794 $ 5,439 $ 4,779<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 77% 82% 78% 81% n/a<br />
Mathematics 53% 68% 62% 84% n/a<br />
Writing 76% 82% 80% 77% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 58% 54% 72% 82% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 216
11211 Tom Adams Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78753 . Blaine Helwig, Principal<br />
Graham Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 617 658 755 818 755<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.40 14.27 15.45 17.59 16.06<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.96 2.43 3.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 46.04 46.12 48.85 46.50 47.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 7.20 5.22 5.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 6.35 8.00 7.00 4.00<br />
Total 56.00 64.09 68.07 60.50 55.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,220,729 $ 3,476,274 $ 3,412,249 $ 3,920,856 $ 3,570,766<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 131,575 131,764 69,590 144,022 142,362<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 71,212 47,405 29,972 39,133 39,444<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 8,098 8,453 5,250 4,227 3,750<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,431,615 $ 3,663,896 $ 3,517,062 $ 4,108,238 $ 3,756,322<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,562 $ 5,568 $ 4,658 $ 5,022 $ 4,975<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 87% 96% 96% 96% n/a<br />
Mathematics 91% 97% 98% >99% n/a<br />
Writing 95% 98% 97% 97% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 72% 89% 97% 93% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 217
6310 Treadwell Boulevard . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78757 . Janie Ruiz, Principal<br />
Gullett Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 482 527 540 564 572<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.99 14.75 15.15 16.11 14.67<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 34.45 35.73 35.63 35.00 39.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.61 5.61 4.95 2.50 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.50 5.67 7.91 8.71 5.75<br />
Total 47.07 48.00 50.09 47.21 48.25<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,831,477 $ 2,946,995 $ 2,995,310 $ 2,737,083 $ 2,709,807<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 78,129 88,956 42,508 81,034 76,003<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 30,822 35,591 27,893 18,832 43,384<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 749 1,466 210 150 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,941,178 $ 3,073,009 $ 3,065,921 $ 2,837,099 $ 2,829,194<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,102 $ 5,831 $ 5,678 $ 5,030 $ 4,946<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 97% 98% 97% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics 96% 97% 94% 95% n/a<br />
Writing 96% 100% 100% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 91% 96% 96% 96% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 218
1711 Wheless Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Gloria Arrendondo, Principal<br />
Harris Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 710 737 758 728 734<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.43 15.91 15.01 17.54 15.78<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 46.00 46.33 50.51 41.50 46.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.00 7.00 6.16 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.78 5.50 4.25 4.00 5.00<br />
Total 57.78 61.83 64.41 49.50 55.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,102,498 $ 3,557,587 $ 3,390,142 $ 3,365,557 $ 3,334,864<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 104,845 114,288 61,588 121,433 123,106<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 53,024 41,754 27,613 31,139 32,080<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 15,176 14,807 7,124 7,700 8,700<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,275,544 $ 3,728,436 $ 3,486,468 $ 3,525,829 $ 3,498,750<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,613 $ 5,059 $ 4,600 $ 4,843 $ 4,767<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 87% 84% 84% 79% n/a<br />
Mathematics 80% 81% 88% 79% n/a<br />
Writing 97% 93% 94% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 57% 66% 89% 74% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 219
Hart Elementary School<br />
8301 Furness Drive. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78753 . Leslie Dusing, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 822 850 892 961 840<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.76 16.27 15.97 18.48 16.63<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.05 5.40 7.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 52.15 52.24 55.86 52.00 50.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.00 4.00 3.10 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.92 7.00 5.90 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 69.12 70.64 73.86 61.50 59.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,836,029 $ 4,005,637 $ 3,943,131 $ 4,066,804 $ 3,750,792<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 118,269 128,172 75,900 135,675 136,693<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 88,142 55,455 43,006 56,946 45,002<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 8,371 8,211 4,177 10,000 9,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,050,811 $ 4,197,475 $ 4,066,214 $ 4,269,425 $ 3,941,487<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,928 $ 4,938 $ 4,559 $ 4,443 $ 4,692<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 67% 73% 81% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 69% 69% 81% 89% n/a<br />
Writing 83% 84% 90% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 40% 70% 79% 87% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 220
4900 Fairview . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78731 . Tammie Workman, Principal<br />
Highland Park Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 600 634 660 648 657<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.71 15.08 15.35 15.38 15.83<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 1.50 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 40.79 42.05 43.01 42.12 41.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.78 3.32 3.65 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 5.00<br />
Total 52.57 53.37 55.16 52.62 50.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,025,470 $ 3,253,189 $ 3,265,686 $ 2,998,541 $ 3,056,069<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 86,578 101,120 99,831 105,421 98,022<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 68,871 35,689 46,395 31,589 36,065<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,241 1,932 2,600 1,500 3,700<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,182,161 $ 3,391,930 $ 3,414,512 $ 3,137,051 $ 3,193,856<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,304 $ 5,350 $ 5,174 $ 4,841 $ 4,861<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 99% 99% >99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 98% 99% 98% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 98% 95% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 99% 99% 97% 98% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 221
8601 Tallwood Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78759 . Beth Ellis, Principal<br />
Hill Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 707 691 735 769 794<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 17.07 16.47 15.86 16.87 17.03<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 41.43 41.94 46.34 45.58 46.63<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 2.00 2.55 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.75 4.00 6.00 4.50 6.25<br />
Total 53.18 49.94 56.89 54.08 56.88<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,140,215 $ 3,218,606 $ 3,246,844 $ 3,103,676 $ 3,223,825<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 115,821 124,528 67,627 120,254 121,007<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 55,885 43,596 36,082 45,023 47,930<br />
Other Expenses (6400) - - 1,391 - -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,311,921 $ 3,386,730 $ 3,351,944 $ 3,268,953 $ 3,392,762<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,684 $ 4,901 $ 4,560 $ 4,251 $ 4,273<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 99% 99% >99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 98% 96% 99% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 99% 93% 100% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 95% 98% 96% 99% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 222
Houston Elementary School<br />
5409 Ponciana Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 .Elia Diaz-Camarillo, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 941 958 920 898 882<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.67 15.06 14.72 16.79 15.75<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.50 2.00 3.00 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 60.07 63.62 62.49 53.50 55.99<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 10.00 8.09 6.67 3.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 6.00<br />
Total 78.07 79.70 78.17 63.00 67.49<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,360,594 $ 4,497,092 $ 3,957,477 $ 4,489,478 $ 4,450,964<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 146,712 149,787 74,163 159,683 171,313<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 70,681 36,376 20,119 29,221 25,207<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,685 3,555 10,913 4,000 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,582,672 $ 4,686,810 $ 4,062,671 $ 4,682,382 $ 4,647,484<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,870 $ 4,892 $ 4,416 $ 5,214 $ 5,269<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 80% 78% 83% 80% n/a<br />
Mathematics 66% 64% 77% 81% n/a<br />
Writing 92% 83% 89% 73% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 51% 66% 84% 72% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 223
4900 Gonzales . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . In-District Charter School<br />
IDEA Allan K-5<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a 0 244<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $<br />
-<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,845,215<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,845,215<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 4,921<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 224
6711 Johnny Morris Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78724 . Diana Vallejo, Principal<br />
Jordan Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 736 810 831 848 763<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.97 14.37 14.72 17.13 16.06<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.00 4.35 6.81 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 49.16 56.35 56.46 49.50 47.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 5.50 2.65 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Total 63.16 72.20 71.92 57.00 55.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,385,958 $ 4,043,509 $ 3,697,255 $ 3,858,000 $ 3,842,970<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 117,515 104,215 56,844 140,101 140,805<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 61,792 27,624 29,981 35,864 18,801<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 9,092 11,349 17,741 17,500 5,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,574,357 $ 4,186,697 $ 3,801,821 $ 4,051,465 $ 4,007,576<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,856 $ 5,169 $ 4,575 $ 4,778 $ 5,252<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 86% 78% 82% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 71% 70% 80% 82% n/a<br />
Writing 83% 87% 84% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 53% 49% 79% 70% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 225
4500 Manchaca Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78745 . Jennifer Pace, Principal<br />
Joslin Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 336 323 362 320 330<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.73 10.65 11.37 11.64 12.94<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 31.32 30.32 31.84 27.50 25.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.50 4.50 4.68 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 7.00 7.00 7.00 2.00 4.00<br />
Total 43.82 43.82 45.52 33.00 33.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,220,130 $ 2,243,816 $ 2,125,965 $ 2,334,637 $ 2,325,318<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 78,942 67,169 45,736 115,429 115,647<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 32,234 17,758 17,590 17,610 18,300<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,065 2,570 1,801 1,100 500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,334,371 $ 2,331,314 $ 2,191,091 $ 2,468,776 $ 2,459,765<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,948 $ 7,218 $ 6,053 $ 7,715 $ 7,454<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 88% 98% 99% 95% n/a<br />
Mathematics 88% 91% 99% 96% n/a<br />
Writing 90% 97% 95% 97% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 93% 97% 100% 94% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 226
Kiker Elementary School<br />
5913 La Crosse Avenue. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78739 . Lori Schneider, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 711 907 932 945 952<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.81 16.38 15.80 16.88 16.18<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.50 0.19 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 48.00 55.38 59.00 56.00 58.84<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 5.00 4.93 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.00 10.50 12.00 9.00 8.00<br />
Total 63.00 73.38 78.62 69.50 71.34<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,630,791 $ 4,086,497 $ 4,194,350 $ 3,789,866 $ 3,786,411<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 120,523 108,787 77,068 151,007 150,563<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 48,686 62,262 41,160 50,441 52,200<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,984 6,589 3,372 6,000 4,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,804,984 $ 4,264,136 $ 4,315,950 $ 3,997,314 $ 3,993,674<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,352 $ 4,701 $ 4,631 $ 4,230 $ 4,195<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 99% 99% >99% n/a<br />
Mathematics 98% 97% 98% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 100% 98% 97% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 95% 97% 100% 97% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 227
9800 Curlew Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . Deanna McParland, Principal<br />
Kocurek Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 677 639 663 659 669<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.21 14.42 15.62 15.88 15.93<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 44.50 44.32 42.45 41.50 42.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 5.00 3.17 2.50 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Total 55.50 58.32 52.62 51.00 51.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,398,365 $ 3,476,237 $ 3,146,941 $ 3,450,596 $ 3,616,861<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 138,179 132,959 74,396 164,838 165,193<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 62,531 46,850 37,545 30,475 25,977<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 5,859 4,261 2,688 2,550 2,050<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,604,934 $ 3,660,307 $ 3,261,570 $ 3,648,459 $ 3,810,081<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,325 $ 5,728 $ 4,919 $ 5,536 $ 5,695<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 89% 85% 86% 86% n/a<br />
Mathematics 78% 84% 82% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 84% 92% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 71% 83% 77% 87% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 228
2206 Blue Meadow . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Dounna Poth, Principal<br />
Langford Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 843 843 847 807 807<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.20 14.42 15.38 16.99 16.64<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 1.00 1.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 59.38 58.48 55.05 47.50 48.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 6.77 5.93 6.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.43 5.00 5.89 2.00 5.00<br />
Total 78.81 73.25 70.38 57.50 58.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,120,529 $ 3,992,638 $ 3,673,335 $ 3,936,118 $ 4,394,759<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 123,403 140,647 79,494 169,837 159,800<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 101,563 55,735 37,928 38,083 44,616<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,645 5,653 11,062 6,156 6,712<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,352,140 $ 4,194,672 $ 3,801,818 $ 4,150,194 $ 4,605,887<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,163 $ 4,976 $ 4,489 $ 5,143 $ 5,707<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 69% 70% 77% 72% n/a<br />
Mathematics 62% 70% 77% 83% n/a<br />
Writing 75% 74% 78% 78% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 57% 58% 70% 73% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 229
3308 Hampton Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78705 . Elyse Smith, Principal<br />
Lee Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 406 441 427 403 396<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.99 15.28 14.43 14.93 15.29<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 27.09 28.86 29.58 27.00 25.90<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.50 1.50 2.24 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00<br />
Total 32.59 34.36 34.82 32.50 32.40<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,078,371 $ 2,177,397 $ 2,165,112 $ 2,012,057 $ 2,065,888<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 79,688 80,413 41,110 91,598 91,119<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 46,621 36,017 39,190 24,480 23,022<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,530 2,480 3,095 3,300 3,186<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,207,210 $ 2,296,307 $ 2,248,506 $ 2,131,435 $ 2,183,215<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,436 $ 5,207 $ 5,266 $ 5,289 $ 5,513<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 100% 100% 99% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics 96% 98% 96% 99% n/a<br />
Writing 99% 98% 96% 99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 95% 98% 100% 97% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 230
2800 Metcalf Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78741 . Beverly Odom, Principal<br />
Linder Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 877 836 882 866 758<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.56 14.87 15.85 15.46 20.49<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 1.66 2.00 2.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.36 3.08 3.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 52.97 56.21 55.63 56.00 37.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.50 6.00 4.82 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Total 65.83 69.95 67.45 63.00 43.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,854,866 $ 4,086,742 $ 3,655,555 $ 4,221,107 $ 4,285,104<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 126,036 130,337 74,067 163,461 147,365<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 64,950 30,962 32,160 43,490 30,157<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 23,443 8,698 9,308 14,090 5,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,069,295 $ 4,256,740 $ 3,771,090 $ 4,442,148 $ 4,467,626<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,640 $ 5,092 $ 4,276 $ 5,130 $ 5,894<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 78% 81% 81% 77% n/a<br />
Mathematics 71% 71% 77% 76% n/a<br />
Writing 89% 84% 93% 89% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 67% 56% 79% 62% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 231
3308 Maplewood Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78722 . Vickie Jacobson, Principal<br />
Maplewood Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 367 420 405 428 453<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.95 13.45 13.19 14.46 14.16<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.16 0.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 30.71 31.22 30.71 29.60 32.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.79 4.00 3.50 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 8.48 6.00 5.00 6.00<br />
Total 44.00 45.36 42.21 38.10 41.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,456,108 $ 2,669,978 $ 2,295,342 $ 2,409,542 $ 2,412,590<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 70,176 83,672 48,963 70,653 69,682<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 32,697 17,283 23,053 19,045 21,527<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,370 926 2,595 1,700 1,700<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,563,350 $ 2,771,859 $ 2,369,953 $ 2,500,940 $ 2,505,499<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,985 $ 6,600 $ 5,852 $ 5,843 $ 5,531<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 83% 84% 83% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 72% 81% 74% 91% n/a<br />
Writing 79% 92% 89% 89% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 61% 70% 86% 96% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 232
906 West Lynn . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78703 . Amy Kinkade, Principal<br />
Mathews Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 411 391 410 392 400<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.54 12.66 13.76 13.93 14.52<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.38 1.38<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 30.35 30.88 29.80 28.15 27.55<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.50 3.50 3.22 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.50 4.00 3.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Total 39.85 40.88 37.52 31.53 30.93<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,308,666 $ 2,308,640 $ 2,104,883 $ 2,320,149 $ 2,339,077<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 69,530 66,642 37,624 80,145 82,136<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 50,218 32,203 25,708 20,677 22,845<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,455 2,218 855 2,000 800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,431,868 $ 2,409,703 $ 2,169,071 $ 2,422,971 $ 2,444,858<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,917 $ 6,163 $ 5,290 $ 6,181 $ 6,112<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 95% 97% 95% 95% n/a<br />
Mathematics 85% 91% 96% 97% n/a<br />
Writing 91% 91% 98% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 84% 85% 88% 85% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 233
McBee Elementary School<br />
1001 West Braker Lane. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78758 . Rafael Soriano, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 740 806 757 760 747<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.48 15.35 14.41 16.89 16.24<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.36 2.79 2.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 51.12 52.51 52.54 45.00 46.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 3.66 3.45 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 4.00<br />
Total 58.48 62.97 63.49 52.50 54.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,526,953 $ 3,636,650 $ 3,464,562 $ 3,492,562 $ 3,418,930<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 121,177 125,777 36,276 131,619 132,644<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 72,429 41,464 39,662 34,604 33,888<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 16,313 5,704 10,137 9,300 10,800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,736,872 $ 3,809,596 $ 3,550,638 $ 3,668,085 $ 3,596,262<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,050 $ 4,727 $ 4,690 $ 4,826 $ 4,814<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 84% 89% 86% 90% n/a<br />
Mathematics 74% 81% 82% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 94% 94% 96% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 59% 81% 75% 77% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 234
12120 Manchaca Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . John Rocha, Principal<br />
Menchaca Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 631 698 675 698 713<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.41 14.58 14.40 16.16 15.33<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 47.04 47.86 46.88 43.19 46.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.00 8.95 8.00 7.00 6.00<br />
Total 62.04 62.81 60.88 54.19 56.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,429,391 $ 3,623,034 $ 3,344,385 $ 3,208,821 $ 3,228,769<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 168,577 172,791 92,642 137,973 140,315<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 58,807 51,595 37,134 39,583 42,004<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,315 6,613 4,182 5,550 6,550<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,663,090 $ 3,854,033 $ 3,478,344 $ 3,391,927 $ 3,417,638<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,805 $ 5,522 $ 5,153 $ 4,859 $ 4,793<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 92% 92% 92% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 83% 86% 88% 93% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 90% 88% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 82% 78% 80% 86% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 235
84 Robert T. Martinez Jr. . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Martha Castillo, Principal<br />
Metz Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 544 491 503 521 529<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.77 14.93 13.14 16.28 14.49<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 39.50 32.89 38.27 32.00 36.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.00 7.00 4.29 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 3.00<br />
Total 49.50 45.89 48.56 38.00 43.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,803,517 $ 2,689,222 $ 2,490,856 $ 2,854,461 $ 2,797,921<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 89,885 88,174 47,541 130,068 132,051<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 50,502 33,782 20,111 23,789 26,966<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 9,977 7,937 7,363 4,800 5,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,953,880 $ 2,819,115 $ 2,565,871 $ 3,013,118 $ 2,961,938<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,430 $ 5,742 $ 5,101 $ 5,783 $ 5,599<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 84% 87% 91% 86% n/a<br />
Mathematics 81% 84% 90% 89% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 94% 93% 85% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 81% 72% 90% 88% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 236
6201 Davis Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Patricia Butler, Principal<br />
Mills Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 1,058 1,097 932 912 882<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.26 16.18 15.73 16.58 16.33<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 65.09 67.81 59.25 55.00 54.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 4.00 3.50 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 9.48 7.00 10.47 8.00 7.00<br />
Total 81.07 81.31 75.72 67.50 65.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,671,720 $ 4,885,928 $ 4,318,368 $ 4,736,255 $ 4,710,845<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 108,664 126,182 68,173 135,981 129,515<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 77,653 69,981 72,478 43,204 48,133<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,890 3,008 5,622 3,000 6,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,861,928 $ 5,085,099 $ 4,464,641 $ 4,918,440 $ 4,894,493<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,595 $ 4,635 $ 4,790 $ 5,393 $ 5,549<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 99% 98% 99% 98% n/a<br />
Mathematics 98% 97% 96% 97% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 98% 98% 96% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 93% 98% 95% 89% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 237
4001 Tannehill Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78721 . Floretta Andrews, Principal<br />
Norman Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 382 314 326 335 307<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.23 11.65 12.07 15.95 13.35<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 3.50 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 28.88 26.94 27.00 21.00 23.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.50 1.31 2.23 1.50 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 1.00 0.91 2.00 1.00 5.00<br />
Total 33.38 34.16 35.23 25.00 31.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,243,500 $ 2,115,844 $ 2,204,294 $ 2,177,884 $ 2,192,306<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 101,193 121,307 56,091 152,234 155,310<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 32,592 18,296 22,373 19,034 16,660<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,618 2,343 6,033 2,000 2,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,380,903 $ 2,257,792 $ 2,288,791 $ 2,351,152 $ 2,366,276<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,233 $ 7,190 $ 7,021 $ 7,018 $ 7,708<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 64% 82% 84% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 63% 77% 87% 91% n/a<br />
Writing 77% 96% 97% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 44% 64% 82% 71% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 238
6101 Patton Ranch Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78735 . Cathryn Mitchell, Principal<br />
Oak Hill Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 951 993 757 758 763<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.45 14.94 14.70 16.84 15.41<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 61.54 66.48 51.49 45.00 49.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 3.00 3.50 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.88 4.00 5.00 3.00 5.00<br />
Total 72.92 75.48 61.99 52.00 58.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,327,489 $ 4,641,139 $ 3,604,896 $ 4,071,902 $ 4,098,227<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 159,770 154,311 79,947 180,988 184,341<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 80,270 53,213 55,955 31,120 31,283<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 455 - 132 - -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,567,984 $ 4,848,663 $ 3,740,930 $ 4,284,010 $ 4,313,851<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,803 $ 4,883 $ 4,942 $ 5,652 $ 5,654<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 97% 96% 96% 96% n/a<br />
Mathematics 89% 93% 94% 96% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 96% 97% 98% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 80% 89% 93% 98% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 239
3601 Webberville Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Monica Woods, Principal<br />
Oak Springs Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 319 303 284 291 300<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.92 11.92 11.25 13.86 13.04<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 2.29 1.96 0.94 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 29.21 25.42 25.24 21.00 23.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.50 3.44 2.49 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00<br />
Total 38.50 35.32 33.17 25.00 28.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,066,493 $ 1,953,144 $ 1,850,630 $ 2,099,380 $ 2,128,292<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 84,838 81,263 46,553 96,629 98,071<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 41,646 22,679 18,234 14,276 16,480<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,005 1,817 3,295 3,000 3,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,198,982 $ 2,058,903 $ 1,918,711 $ 2,213,285 $ 2,246,343<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,893 $ 6,795 $ 6,756 $ 7,606 $ 7,488<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 71% 68% 86% 91% n/a<br />
Mathematics 79% 70% 86% 95% n/a<br />
Writing 67% 76% 100% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 64% 66% 87% 70% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 240
1010 Turtle Creek Boulevard . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78745 . Sondra McWilliams, Principal<br />
Odom Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 712 688 663 678 678<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.26 15.05 14.89 16.78 15.77<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 2.00 1.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 49.94 45.71 44.52 40.40 43.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 4.00 4.03 3.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Total 58.94 57.71 56.06 48.90 51.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,429,767 $ 3,468,776 $ 3,111,147 $ 3,441,431 $ 3,434,281<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 171,600 158,410 88,677 200,229 205,436<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 81,248 32,995 15,718 19,514 22,407<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,881 4,174 1,432 2,350 5,400<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,686,496 $ 3,664,355 $ 3,216,973 $ 3,663,524 $ 3,667,524<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,178 $ 5,326 $ 4,852 $ 5,403 $ 5,409<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 78% 85% 85% 85% n/a<br />
Mathematics 75% 82% 76% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 92% 82% 92% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 62% 71% 75% 85% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 241
1135 Garland Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78721 . Anna Pedroza, Principal<br />
Ortega Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 257 284 295 285 399<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.97 11.31 11.09 12.39 14.25<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 23.42 25.11 26.59 23.00 28.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.23 4.60 2.48 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 4.00 5.00 4.00 3.00<br />
Total 32.65 35.71 35.07 30.50 34.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,848,037 $ 2,047,955 $ 1,942,503 $ 1,945,229 $ 2,154,345<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 67,781 66,338 40,894 84,123 87,341<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 27,226 13,190 12,044 14,577 14,143<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,997 1,762 2,209 3,700 2,800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,945,041 $ 2,129,244 $ 1,997,650 $ 2,047,629 $ 2,258,629<br />
Per Student Cost $ 7,568 $ 7,497 $ 6,772 $ 7,185 $ 5,661<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 91% 94% 96% 97% n/a<br />
Mathematics 96% 92% 97% 96% n/a<br />
Writing 100% 100% 100% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 84% 91% 97% 71% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 242
7201 Colony Loop . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78724 . Courtney Colvin, Principal<br />
Overton Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a 716 655 780 709<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a 15.23 14.18 18.57 15.76<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals n/a 3.27 4.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers n/a 47.01 46.19 42.00 45.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a 3.50 4.32 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides n/a 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Total n/a 59.77 61.51 50.00 53.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,963,195 $ 3,266,652 $ 3,189,254 $ 2,998,893 $ 3,006,199<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 182,785 206,222 65,359 226,144 228,541<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 108,294 37,157 31,605 28,872 43,062<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 17,066 14,815 6,371 15,412 5,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,271,340 $ 3,524,846 $ 3,292,589 $ 3,269,321 $ 3,282,802<br />
Per Student Cost n/a $ 4,923 $ 5,027 $ 4,191 $ 4,630<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 73% 87% 92% 90% n/a<br />
Mathematics 76% 88% 91% 94% n/a<br />
Writing 89% 96% 99% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 71% 71% 87% 85% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 243
7601 Dixie Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Joanne Garza, Principal<br />
Palm Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 666 661 603 555 543<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.76 14.78 14.01 14.80 13.75<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.74 1.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 45.11 44.73 43.05 37.50 39.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 5.00 3.27 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 3.98 5.00 2.00 4.00<br />
Total 57.11 57.45 54.82 43.50 47.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,212,582 $ 3,262,802 $ 2,892,129 $ 3,087,233 $ 3,110,482<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 124,619 110,691 65,354 137,821 126,134<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 68,329 43,524 30,854 51,644 47,269<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,166 7,343 10,152 1,000 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,409,696 $ 3,424,359 $ 2,998,488 $ 3,277,698 $ 3,283,885<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,120 $ 5,181 $ 4,973 $ 5,906 $ 6,048<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 81% 74% 87% 86% n/a<br />
Mathematics 75% 67% 80% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 91% 77% 86% 85% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 54% 67% 75% 80% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 244
6001 Westbrook . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78749 . Alan Stevens, Principal<br />
Patton Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 732 765 922 996 997<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.74 16.74 17.26 17.95 16.90<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 46.50 45.70 53.42 55.50 59.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 3.00 3.22 2.00 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 4.00<br />
Total 54.50 56.70 64.64 64.50 67.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,475,769 $ 3,626,948 $ 3,941,727 $ 3,874,887 $ 3,749,058<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 131,240 130,847 78,336 151,029 154,206<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 71,913 52,607 59,769 61,158 64,526<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,814 2,063 2,354 2,800 2,800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,680,737 $ 3,812,466 $ 4,082,186 $ 4,089,874 $ 3,970,590<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,028 $ 4,984 $ 4,428 $ 4,106 $ 3,983<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 97% 98% 97% 95% n/a<br />
Mathematics 92% 95% 98% 96% n/a<br />
Writing 95% 99% 99% 96% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 83% 96% 98% 97% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 245
1106 Rio Grande . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78701 . Donna Martinez, Principal<br />
Pease Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 254 251 257 256 270<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.51 13.94 14.71 13.97 14.82<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 17.50 18.00 17.48 18.32 18.22<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.50 1.95 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 0.88 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50<br />
Total 20.88 21.46 21.78 21.82 21.72<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,377,743 $ 1,421,094 $ 1,437,276 $ 1,439,406 $ 1,458,569<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 68,371 67,600 34,699 73,086 74,402<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 23,193 16,883 20,813 14,328 17,009<br />
Other Expenses (6400) - 397 449 600 100<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,469,307 $ 1,505,972 $ 1,493,237 $ 1,527,420 $ 1,550,080<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,785 $ 6,000 $ 5,810 $ 5,966 $ 5,741<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 94% 95% 96% 95% n/a<br />
Mathematics 88% 94% 95% 94% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 97% 100% 97% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 81% 100% 89% 87% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 246
3100 Rogge Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Elaine McKinney, Principal<br />
Pecan Springs Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 505 523 541 463 461<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.62 13.81 11.90 15.18 13.97<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 1.47 2.12 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 40.00 37.88 45.47 30.50 33.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 1.97 2.89 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 4.00<br />
Total 53.00 47.82 56.99 37.00 40.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,872,791 $ 2,794,596 $ 2,789,025 $ 2,772,076 $ 2,748,384<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 89,700 84,229 58,568 107,217 108,474<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 32,826 25,733 16,413 19,445 18,273<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,185 4,494 12,791 6,500 4,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,997,501 $ 2,909,052 $ 2,876,797 $ 2,905,238 $ 2,879,631<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,936 $ 5,562 $ 5,318 $ 6,275 $ 6,246<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 82% 76% 80% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 83% 72% 79% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 83% 78% 90% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 78% 63% 83% 69% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 247
7500 S. Pleasant Valley Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . David Kauffman, Principal<br />
Perez Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 700 800 881 904 950<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.17 14.72 14.74 16.44 16.52<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 2.35 1.74 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 53.16 54.35 59.78 55.00 57.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 2.00 3.07 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 4.00 5.00 3.00 5.00<br />
Total 64.50 64.09 70.84 62.50 67.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,609,913 $ 3,862,491 $ 3,901,185 $ 3,984,605 $ 3,791,230<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 172,830 198,122 109,287 238,126 245,477<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 66,400 57,365 35,182 37,188 53,063<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 5,307 2,831 10,130 6,600 6,600<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,854,450 $ 4,120,809 $ 4,055,784 $ 4,266,519 $ 4,096,370<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,506 $ 5,151 $ 4,604 $ 4,720 $ 4,312<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 82% 86% 79% 85% n/a<br />
Mathematics 77% 83% 81% 84% n/a<br />
Writing 91% 91% 96% 86% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 69% 81% 79% 83% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 248
1101 Wheatley Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78752 . Joel De La Garza, Principal<br />
Pickle Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 715 722 734 757 760<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.19 14.71 14.91 15.94 15.35<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.79 4.20 4.04 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 50.39 49.10 49.21 47.50 49.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.92 5.00 5.47 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 1.96 3.00 3.93 3.00 5.00<br />
Total 59.06 63.30 64.64 55.00 59.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,491,028 $ 3,722,470 $ 3,447,739 $ 4,077,867 $ 3,997,868<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 163,124 175,000 108,288 221,776 218,096<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 58,069 39,758 30,507 37,102 45,888<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 9,641 6,963 4,326 8,500 7,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,721,861 $ 3,944,192 $ 3,590,860 $ 4,345,245 $ 4,269,352<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,205 $ 5,463 $ 4,892 $ 5,740 $ 5,618<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 77% 78% 76% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 78% 76% 78% 84% n/a<br />
Writing 73% 90% 90% 90% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 56% 60% 83% 85% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 249
3025 Crosscreek Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78758 . Tonya King, Principal<br />
Pillow Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 568 648 657 672 688<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.02 14.87 14.78 15.81 15.64<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 40.50 43.56 44.47 42.50 44.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.50 2.50 3.12 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 8.00 10.00 7.00 7.00<br />
Total 53.00 55.06 60.27 53.50 55.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,074,716 $ 3,453,741 $ 3,283,005 $ 3,379,462 $ 3,390,348<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 117,937 121,094 64,441 113,657 113,914<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 45,659 28,093 27,193 27,657 28,449<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 669 892 196 500 500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,238,981 $ 3,603,821 $ 3,374,835 $ 3,521,276 $ 3,533,211<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,702 $ 5,561 $ 5,137 $ 5,240 $ 5,135<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 95% 93% 91% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 94% 90% 87% 88% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 98% 89% 91% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 94% 98% 96% 81% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 250
6405 Circle S Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78745 . Sharon Stoner, Principal<br />
Pleasant Hill Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 629 623 618 610 623<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.35 15.05 13.64 15.44 14.83<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 40.98 41.39 45.29 39.50 42.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 2.50 3.59 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 5.41 6.50 4.00 4.00<br />
Total 54.98 52.30 59.38 47.50 50.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,013,431 $ 3,302,055 $ 3,168,386 $ 3,310,394 $ 3,290,863<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 118,492 152,670 75,378 126,022 122,427<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 62,384 30,126 22,096 18,417 19,912<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,628 843 1,417 4,000 4,900<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,196,935 $ 3,485,694 $ 3,267,277 $ 3,458,833 $ 3,438,102<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,083 $ 5,595 $ 5,287 $ 5,670 $ 5,519<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 75% 76% 80% 82% n/a<br />
Mathematics 60% 61% 77% 86% n/a<br />
Writing 73% 77% 82% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 47% 58% 75% 71% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 251
2608 RichCreek . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78757 . Ami Cortes, Principal<br />
Read Pre-K Demonstration School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 556 481 510 471 479<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.63 16.37 15.12 17.44 16.81<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 38.00 29.38 33.74 27.00 28.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.00 2.00 4.31 3.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 5.00<br />
Total 45.00 35.38 41.05 33.00 38.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,863,363 $ 1,931,694 $ 923,517 $ 2,912,484 $ 2,838,946<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 89,724 108,689 76,256 147,092 149,247<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 47,895 37,419 62,047 34,249 28,687<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,678 4,504 3,266 6,400 5,300<br />
Equipment (6600) - 401 - - -<br />
Total $ 2,005,659 $ 2,082,708 $ 1,065,085 $ 3,100,225 $ 3,022,180<br />
Per Student Cost $ 3,607 $ 4,330 $ 2,088 $ 6,582 $ 6,309<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 252
405 Denson Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78752 . Dinorah Bores, Principal<br />
Reilly Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 274 304 302 324 418<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.74 12.57 11.32 15.43 15.48<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 21.50 24.19 26.68 21.00 27.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.00 3.00 2.49 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Total 26.50 31.19 34.17 27.50 33.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,615,276 $ 1,771,330 $ 1,790,678 $ 1,818,047 $ 2,047,086<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 54,493 58,486 34,364 65,283 64,410<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 41,102 14,699 12,020 15,761 19,451<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,493 5,866 2,001 5,515 4,750<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,714,363 $ 1,850,381 $ 1,839,062 $ 1,904,606 $ 2,135,697<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,257 $ 6,087 $ 6,090 $ 5,878 $ 5,109<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 87% 91% 89% 84% n/a<br />
Mathematics 89% 80% 83% 89% n/a<br />
Writing 96% 96% 100% 88% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 97% 83% 100% 85% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 253
5005 Caswell Avenue . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78751 . Joaquin Gloria, Principal<br />
Ridgetop Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 196 188 220 292 315<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.89 9.96 11.19 13.90 12.35<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.75<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 18.00 18.88 19.66 21.00 25.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 1.75 1.75 2.61 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Total 22.75 24.63 26.26 27.00 32.25<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,423,360 $ 1,514,835 $ 1,553,192 $ 1,683,894 $ 1,712,678<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 49,536 53,196 28,569 61,512 62,863<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 29,033 12,886 13,860 12,199 6,171<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,061 9,941 8,319 1,650 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,507,990 $ 1,590,858 $ 1,603,941 $ 1,759,255 $ 1,781,712<br />
Per Student Cost $ 7,694 $ 8,462 $ 7,291 $ 6,025 $ 5,656<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 79% 88% 93% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 82% 84% 95% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 81% 89% 95% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 50% 71% 95% 67% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 254
4400 Franklin Park Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Monica Villasenor, Principal<br />
Rodriguez Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 977 955 922 944 824<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.07 15.53 16.26 19.07 14.09<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 4.10 4.31 4.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 64.82 61.49 56.71 49.50 58.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 4.00 5.74 7.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 5.00<br />
Total 80.42 76.30 73.46 61.00 68.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,387,546 $ 4,398,263 $ 4,025,689 $ 4,510,638 $ 4,367,814<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 117,520 131,986 83,128 154,000 161,659<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 86,883 60,566 52,442 28,482 31,097<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 15,211 4,836 8,688 500 3,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,607,159 $ 4,595,650 $ 4,169,947 $ 4,693,620 $ 4,564,070<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,716 $ 4,812 $ 4,523 $ 4,972 $ 5,539<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 75% 73% 70% 77% n/a<br />
Mathematics 74% 71% 74% 84% n/a<br />
Writing 83% 82% 85% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 60% 55% 71% 69% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 255
73 San Marcos . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Azucena Garcia, Principal<br />
Sanchez Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 608 617 597 587 287<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.68 14.28 13.27 16.31 7.65<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 41.42 43.22 45.00 36.00 37.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 7.50 5.24 4.22 5.00 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 3.43 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00<br />
Total 54.84 55.46 56.22 46.00 46.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,073,336 $ 3,393,020 $ 3,049,147 $ 3,255,587 $ 3,322,020<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 122,129 122,875 80,567 160,210 156,009<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 44,532 27,705 26,683 28,154 19,448<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,689 2,098 2,123 7,500 11,400<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,244,686 $ 3,545,698 $ 3,158,521 $ 3,451,451 $ 3,508,877<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,337 $ 5,747 $ 5,291 $ 5,880 $ 12,226<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 85% 81% 87% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 83% 77% 87% 90% n/a<br />
Writing 95% 86% 96% 90% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 70% 54% 82% 90% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 256
1203 Springdale Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78721 . Freda Mills, Principal<br />
Sims Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 401 314 275 310 571<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.44 12.26 11.39 14.76 23.79<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.00 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 4.50 5.50 4.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 29.85 25.61 24.14 21.00 24.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 2.00 3.16 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 2.00<br />
Total 43.85 35.61 33.29 24.00 29.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,350,594 $ 2,033,666 $ 1,777,464 $ 2,246,735 $ 2,219,104<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 73,700 69,291 35,793 88,822 85,446<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 54,843 19,352 23,688 11,077 13,710<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 13,624 8,063 9,118 3,000 7,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,492,761 $ 2,130,373 $ 1,846,062 $ 2,349,634 $ 2,325,260<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,216 $ 6,785 $ 6,713 $ 7,579 $ 4,072<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 86% 82% 93% 97% n/a<br />
Mathematics 80% 84% 89% 92% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 90% 98% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 65% 76% 83% 63% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 257
600 West St. Elmo Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78745 . Adriana Gonzales, Principal<br />
St. Elmo Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 357 347 304 287 291<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.31 12.94 11.26 13.05 13.23<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 1.50 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 29.00 26.82 27.00 22.00 22.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.50 2.50 3.48 2.00 2.21<br />
Educational Aides 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00<br />
Total 35.50 33.32 34.98 27.50 26.71<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,138,101 $ 2,214,960 $ 2,028,230 $ 2,089,536 $ 2,266,960<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 88,083 94,633 46,426 113,481 111,723<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 38,630 35,196 26,493 14,426 8,450<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,084 1,718 1,887 700 1,600<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,268,899 $ 2,346,507 $ 2,103,036 $ 2,218,143 $ 2,388,733<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,355 $ 6,762 $ 6,918 $ 7,729 $ 8,209<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 84% 92% 93% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 78% 92% 91% 95% n/a<br />
Writing 85% 89% 93% >99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 67% 80% 83% >99% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 258
12207 Brigadoon Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78727 . Dedra Standish, Principal<br />
Summitt Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 702 747 850 751 781<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.30 14.16 15.27 13.29 16.10<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 49.10 52.75 55.68 56.50 48.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.50 2.50 2.60 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.85 7.00 7.96 4.00 4.00<br />
Total 62.45 64.25 68.24 65.00 56.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,598,382 $ 3,783,414 $ 3,886,635 $ 3,986,733 $ 3,668,390<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 114,644 144,073 62,697 142,400 146,017<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 74,784 66,498 46,957 62,847 48,133<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,575 3,942 2,934 7,400 7,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,790,385 $ 3,997,927 $ 3,999,223 $ 4,199,380 $ 3,870,040<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,399 $ 5,352 $ 4,705 $ 5,592 $ 4,955<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 98% 95% 95% 93% n/a<br />
Mathematics 96% 95% 96% 95% n/a<br />
Writing 98% 96% 97% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 86% 96% 94% 88% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 259
3000 Jones Road . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78745 . Kim Placker, Principal<br />
Sunset Valley Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 443 464 444 499 505<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.66 11.95 11.38 14.98 13.12<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 1.50 2.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 38.00 38.82 39.00 33.31 38.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 2.50 3.00 2.74 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 7.00 5.00 4.00 5.00<br />
Total 48.00 51.82 50.74 40.81 47.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,085,150 $ 3,312,234 $ 3,101,034 $ 3,359,073 $ 3,348,584<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 98,280 104,241 55,976 130,614 130,994<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 28,189 19,487 14,131 20,678 23,111<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 2,317 1,849 1,439 - 2,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,213,936 $ 3,437,811 $ 3,172,581 $ 3,510,365 $ 3,505,189<br />
Per Student Cost $ 7,255 $ 7,409 $ 7,145 $ 7,035 $ 6,941<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 83% 86% 84% 92% n/a<br />
Mathematics 77% 85% 92% 94% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 87% 94% 92% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 57% 83% 92% 78% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 260
2010 Alameda Drive . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Lisa Robertson, Principal<br />
Travis Heights Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 564 525 540 540 549<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.82 13.19 13.73 14.40 14.08<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 1.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 44.00 39.79 39.33 37.50 39.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.50 4.74 4.01 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 5.50 7.00 6.97 3.00 3.00<br />
Total 57.00 54.27 52.31 44.75 46.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,201,567 $ 3,038,012 $ 2,811,823 $ 3,383,022 $ 3,078,347<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 99,921 82,558 47,137 96,701 102,890<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 42,133 9,653 13,883 14,565 16,607<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,245 1,833 3,543 2,000 2,000<br />
Equipment (6600) - - 54,626 - -<br />
Total $ 3,346,867 $ 3,132,055 $ 2,931,012 $ 3,496,288 $ 3,199,844<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,934 $ 5,966 $ 5,327 $ 17,829 $ 5,828<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 85% 86% 89% 89% n/a<br />
Mathematics 75% 81% 88% 91% n/a<br />
Writing 83% 83% 89% 89% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 52% 85% 85% 79% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 261
Uphaus Early Childhood Center<br />
5200 Freidrich Lane. <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Janice Darrington Weston, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a 0 240<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a 13.71<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a 0.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.00<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a 17.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a 3.00<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a 2.00<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 1,428,480<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a 81,500<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a 23,114<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,533,094<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 6,388<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 262
4010 West Braker Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78753 . Paul Perez, Principal<br />
Walnut Creek Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 764 901 928 930 948<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.38 15.81 16.33 17.22 16.07<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 6.79 5.50 9.08 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 49.67 56.99 56.82 54.00 59.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 7.50 6.00 3.33 3.00 3.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 5.48 5.00 6.00 6.00<br />
Total 67.96 76.47 76.22 65.50 70.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,895,518 $ 4,321,138 $ 3,996,288 $ 4,130,633 $ 4,115,501<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 144,602 133,821 68,437 146,721 138,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 53,061 44,421 24,660 50,179 65,986<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 3,189 3,991 2,868 - -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,096,370 $ 4,503,371 $ 4,092,253 $ 4,327,533 $ 4,319,487<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,362 $ 4,998 $ 4,410 $ 4,653 $ 4,556<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 83% 79% 73% 82% n/a<br />
Mathematics 74% 74% 81% 86% n/a<br />
Writing 93% 79% 85% 87% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 57% 68% 73% 72% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 263
601 East St. Johns . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78752 . Dolores Godinez, Director<br />
Webb Primary Center<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment n/a n/a n/a n/a 234<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio n/a n/a n/a n/a 14.63<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.00<br />
Other Professionals n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.00<br />
Teachers n/a n/a n/a n/a 16.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.50<br />
Educational Aides n/a n/a n/a n/a 4.50<br />
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 306,408<br />
Contracted Services (6200) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) n/a n/a n/a n/a 16,760<br />
Other Expenses (6400) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Equipment (6600) n/a n/a n/a n/a -<br />
Total $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 323,168<br />
Per Student Cost n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 1,381<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 264
5606 Nuckols Crossing . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78744 . Kimberly Royal, Principal<br />
Widen Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 822 804 782 747 739<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.30 15.01 14.12 16.24 14.35<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 3.00 2.00 2.33 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 57.49 53.57 55.37 46.00 51.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.50 6.50 5.49 2.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 6.00<br />
Total 73.99 69.08 71.19 55.50 62.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,934,624 $ 3,902,961 $ 3,537,495 $ 3,918,262 $ 4,194,403<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 127,491 148,503 84,769 177,412 189,221<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 75,659 37,492 27,122 24,026 35,394<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 12,043 6,484 1,854 - 750<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,149,817 $ 4,095,441 $ 3,651,240 $ 4,119,700 $ 4,419,768<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,048 $ 5,094 $ 4,669 $ 5,515 $ 5,981<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 73% 76% 69% 69% n/a<br />
Mathematics 71% 69% 73% 77% n/a<br />
Writing 70% 92% 80% 90% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 68% 66% 75% 79% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 265
500 Mario . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78748 . Vesta Bertino, Principal<br />
Williams Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 691 668 634 618 606<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.11 13.41 13.16 14.21 14.26<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 1.49 0.96 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 48.98 49.80 48.18 43.50 42.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 5.00 5.40 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.00 9.00 11.00 12.00 12.00<br />
Total 64.98 67.30 67.54 59.50 58.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,690,663 $ 3,796,829 $ 3,546,458 $ 3,868,784 $ 3,761,089<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 125,774 127,687 71,478 161,508 159,707<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 57,599 45,012 38,921 37,560 40,724<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 149 171 2,930 1,000 5,162<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,874,185 $ 3,969,698 $ 3,659,788 $ 4,068,852 $ 3,966,682<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,607 $ 5,943 $ 5,773 $ 6,584 $ 6,546<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 89% 85% 88% 84% n/a<br />
Mathematics 81% 74% 83% 79% n/a<br />
Writing 91% 86% 95% 82% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 52% 67% 74% 73% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 266
3500 Susquehanna Lane . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78723 . Cynthia Gonzales, Principal<br />
Winn Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 425 440 480 394 384<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.37 13.39 13.99 13.92 13.02<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 3.30 3.29 4.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 34.36 32.87 34.31 28.30 29.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 5.00 4.00 3.22 4.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 5.00<br />
Total 46.17 43.15 45.53 36.30 38.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,535,018 $ 2,475,086 $ 2,536,754 $ 2,699,545 $ 2,646,040<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 112,678 94,924 70,163 131,302 131,245<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 31,680 28,452 13,581 19,770 17,032<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 5,232 4,213 8,833 4,500 5,500<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,684,609 $ 2,602,675 $ 2,629,330 $ 2,855,117 $ 2,799,817<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,317 $ 5,915 $ 5,478 $ 7,246 $ 7,291<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 69% 79% 80% 83% n/a<br />
Mathematics 71% 78% 85% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 88% 88% 96% 94% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 45% 96% 83% 68% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 267
Wooldridge Elementary School<br />
1412 Norseman Terrace . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78758 .Sheri Mull, Principal<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 839 881 878 909 914<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.10 16.09 15.40 18.74 16.62<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.50<br />
Other Professionals 3.00 4.00 3.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 55.57 54.74 57.00 48.50 55.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.89 6.00 5.65 5.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 2.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Total 67.46 70.74 72.66 58.00 61.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,873,901 $ 4,001,910 $ 4,015,890 $ 3,973,710 $ 3,910,963<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 153,351 145,676 86,841 189,212 192,095<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 90,845 37,178 35,193 32,773 33,929<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 11,206 6,200 13,077 4,000 4,800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 4,129,301 $ 4,190,964 $ 4,151,001 $ 4,199,695 $ 4,141,787<br />
Per Student Cost $ 4,922 $ 4,757 $ 4,728 $ 4,620 $ 4,531<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 89% 90% 85% 86% n/a<br />
Mathematics 80% 82% 81% 84% n/a<br />
Writing 96% 93% 94% 95% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 53% 82% 74% 73% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 268
1406 Dale . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78757 . Ron Bolek, Principal<br />
Wooten Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 675 682 703 674 675<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.00 13.64 13.88 15.32 14.67<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 2.00 1.16 0.18 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 45.00 49.99 50.64 44.00 46.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 2.50 3.99 4.50 2.50<br />
Educational Aides 10.00 9.91 9.00 8.00 8.00<br />
Total 63.00 65.56 65.81 58.50 58.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,345,124 $ 3,672,081 $ 3,579,858 $ 3,588,526 $ 3,600,416<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 100,025 108,836 67,358 127,860 129,645<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 74,143 44,786 27,765 35,321 31,766<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 10,755 11,885 7,712 9,800 10,300<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,530,046 $ 3,837,588 $ 3,682,693 $ 3,761,507 $ 3,772,127<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,230 $ 5,627 $ 5,239 $ 5,581 $ 5,588<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 79% 85% 86% 93% n/a<br />
Mathematics 74% 86% 84% 85% n/a<br />
Writing 94% 83% 85% 93% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 42% 83% 98% 79% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 269
310 Robert Martinez Jr. . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Sean Fox, Principal<br />
Zavala Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 435 388 410 418 411<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 12.79 11.47 12.59 13.70 12.65<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 1.50 1.50 1.03 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 34.00 33.82 32.58 30.50 32.50<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.50 3.50 3.43 3.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.00 5.00 5.00 3.00 5.00<br />
Total 47.50 45.32 43.54 38.00 41.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,564,041 $ 2,587,058 $ 2,358,458 $ 2,642,299 $ 2,695,036<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 89,072 88,983 49,685 111,658 113,287<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 42,553 34,163 32,854 22,362 22,490<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 6,431 5,588 10,640 3,639 1,650<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,702,097 $ 2,715,791 $ 2,451,638 $ 2,779,958 $ 2,832,463<br />
Per Student Cost $ 6,212 $ 6,999 $ 5,980 $ 6,651 $ 6,892<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 80% 80% 86% 82% n/a<br />
Mathematics 68% 72% 80% 90% n/a<br />
Writing 84% 85% 93% 86% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 60% 69% 83% 79% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 270
1900 Bluebonnet . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . Randall Thomson, Principal<br />
Zilker Elementary School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 497 520 523 530 548<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 13.08 13.96 14.38 14.72 14.81<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Other Professionals 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 38.01 37.24 36.36 36.00 37.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.00 2.90 3.57 2.00 2.00<br />
Educational Aides 8.50 9.95 10.00 6.00 4.00<br />
Total 52.51 52.10 51.93 45.50 44.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,772,656 $ 2,789,418 $ 2,660,498 $ 2,721,550 $ 2,694,260<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 85,331 74,935 45,520 104,111 106,395<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 65,547 35,717 28,712 29,460 30,441<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 1,278 1,295 1,528 4,450 4,450<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,924,812 $ 2,901,366 $ 2,736,258 $ 2,859,571 $ 2,835,546<br />
Per Student Cost $ 5,885 $ 5,580 $ 5,232 $ 5,395 $ 5,174<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 98% 95% 98% 95% n/a<br />
Mathematics 94% 93% 94% 89% n/a<br />
Writing 97% 93% 100% 99% n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science 94% 98% 98% 97% n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 271
A<strong>ISD</strong> Special Campuses<br />
Alternative Learning Center also includes the following:<br />
Leadership Academy<br />
Phoenix Academy<br />
Travis County Day School<br />
Travis County Juvenile Detention Center<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> State Hospital<br />
Elementary Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP)<br />
Garza Independence High School<br />
Rosedale<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 272
901 Neal . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Jeff Davis, Academy Director<br />
Alternative Learning Center<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 401 344 358 306 276<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 8.35 7.35 7.07 5.77 5.75<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 48.00 46.81 50.64 53.00 48.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.00 5.00 7.00 5.00 6.00<br />
Educational Aides 10.00 13.00 19.00 19.00 17.00<br />
Total 67.00 67.81 79.64 80.00 74.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,490,528 $ 4,725,974 $ 4,884,915 $ 5,269,990 $ 5,265,096<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 195,505 207,639 152,180 262,678 223,476<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 69,664 58,831 49,536 76,951 171,089<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 8,024 7,454 8,066 8,630 4,380<br />
Equipment (6600) - 6,540 - - -<br />
Total $ 4,763,720 $ 5,006,437 $ 5,094,697 $ 5,618,249 $ 5,664,041<br />
Per Student Cost $ 11,880 $ 14,511 $ 17,212 $ 18,360 $ 17,164<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a 77% 86% 52% n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a 67% n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 273
4110 Guadalupe . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78751 . Gloria Williams, Administrator<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> State Hospital<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 21 15 16 21 21<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 3.50 2.31 2.70 3.50 3.50<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 6.00 6.50 5.92 6.00 6.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00<br />
Educational Aides 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Total 9.00 9.50 8.97 9.00 9.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 506,167 $ 495,664 $ 518,575 $ 449,906 $ 448,616<br />
Contracted Services (6200) - - - 308 308<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 4,474 4,277 - 4,816 4,816<br />
Other Expenses (6400) - - - - -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 510,641 $ 499,941 $ 518,575 $ 455,030 $ 453,740<br />
Per Student Cost $ 24,316 $ 33,329 $ 32,411 $ 21,668 $ 21,607<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 274
906 West Milton Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78704 . La Kesha Drinks, Principal<br />
Elementary Disciplinary Alternative Education Program<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 22 19 20 0 0<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 3.14 2.66 2.43 0.00 0.00<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.75 0.80 1.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 7.00 7.14 8.23 6.40 3.40<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 3.00 3.50 3.66 4.00 1.00<br />
Educational Aides 7.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 1.00<br />
Total 18.75 18.44 19.89 17.40 5.40<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 982,584 $ 1,009,464 $ 997,659 $ 1,105,290 $ 1,108,025<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 1,488 1,771 1,472 2,800 -<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 26,520 20,772 20,845 21,761 38,268<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 5,508 3,587 1,762 3,950 -<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 1,016,100 $ 1,035,594 $ 1,021,739 $ 1,133,801 $ 1,146,293<br />
Per Student Cost $ 46,186 $ 54,505 $ 51,087 #DIV/0! n/a<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
NOTE: Alternative Learning Center for Elementary Students was remodeled into Elementary Disciplinary Alternative Education Program<br />
(DAEP). This change was part of the Annual Academic Facilities Recommendation. With no permanent student enrollment, Elementary<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 275<br />
DAEP provides support and services to student, who return to their home school.
1600 Chicon . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78702 . Linda Webb, Principal<br />
Garza High School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 245 234 226 181 287<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.10 10.47 10.59 8.83 13.67<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.06 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 22.08 22.36 21.33 20.50 21.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 4.89 5.26 5.57 4.50 4.00<br />
Educational Aides 6.87 4.00 5.00 8.00 5.50<br />
Total 35.84 33.68 33.90 35.00 32.50<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,572,647 $ 2,810,679 $ 2,774,316 $ 2,813,921 $ 2,886,178<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 113,475 112,560 91,005 142,625 143,086<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 131,812 58,791 106,923 72,681 78,796<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 12,652 6,290 9,063 17,250 12,800<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 2,830,586 $ 2,988,320 $ 2,981,306 $ 3,046,477 $ 3,120,860<br />
Per Student Cost $ 11,553 $ 12,771 $ 13,192 $ 16,831 $ 10,874<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading 90% 96% 90% n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics 80% 79% 80% n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies 98% 100% 98% n/a n/a<br />
Science 98% 79% 91% n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 276
2117 West 49 th Street . <strong>Austin</strong>, Texas 78756 . Elizabeth Dickey, Principal<br />
Rosedale School<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Actual <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Enrollment 120 146 150 287 181<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 4.32 5.29 7.60 13.05 7.87<br />
Staff FTEs<br />
Professional:<br />
Campus Administration 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Other Professionals 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Teachers 27.76 27.59 19.73 22.00 23.00<br />
Support:<br />
Professional Support Staff 6.50 7.88 7.79 1.50 1.50<br />
Educational Aides 38.90 46.91 49.00 41.00 32.50<br />
Total 75.16 84.38 78.52 66.50 59.00<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Audited Audited Audited <strong>Budget</strong>ed <strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,509,671 $ 3,555,375 $ 4,299,337 $ 3,829,811 $ 3,893,620<br />
Contracted Services (6200) 61,770 64,640 81,605 67,063 67,838<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) 55,254 56,491 88,379 54,411 53,499<br />
Other Expenses (6400) 4,650 3,373 6,943 4,015 4,915<br />
Equipment (6600) - - - - -<br />
Total $ 3,631,345 $ 3,679,879 $ 4,476,264 $ 3,955,300 $ 4,019,872<br />
Per Student Cost $ 30,261 $ 25,205 $ 29,842 $ 13,782 $ 22,209<br />
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
TAKS TAKS TAKS TAKS STAAR<br />
Assessment Results-Percent Met Standard<br />
Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Mathematics n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Writing n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Social Studies n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
Science n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 277
This Page Intentionally Left Blank<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 278
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
General Fund<br />
Non‐Campus<br />
Departmental<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>s &<br />
Key<br />
Performance<br />
Indicators
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
General Fund<br />
Non-campus Departments<br />
Key Performance Indicators<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> has a responsibility to manage taxpayer resources wisely by developing tools and models to<br />
regularly monitor program effectiveness, and by identifying and implementing fiscal and operational<br />
efficiencies. As identified as Key Action Step 4.3 in the <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Strategic Plan, FY2010-FY2015, the<br />
district is developing a performance management framework.<br />
KPI’s link non-campus departmental budgets to the Strategic Plan, the annual A<strong>ISD</strong> customer service<br />
survey, standardized testing results, and other efficiency and effectiveness measurements. They<br />
establish and monitor expenditures & performance on an annual basis. When operational efficiency<br />
improves, more resources can be shifted into the classroom. Each non-campus departmental summary<br />
sheet incorporates business elements and strategic elements:<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The department’s mission is a clear, concise statement of purpose for the entire department.<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Includes actual expenditure data for FY2010 and FY2011, the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> and the <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
Full Time Equivalents (FTE) / Staffing<br />
Includes actual FTE data for FY2010 and FY2011, the FY2012 Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> and the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
Key Services<br />
Services & initiatives, both internal and external to the district:<br />
What are you doing?<br />
Who are you doing it for?<br />
Why are you doing it?<br />
Key Performance Indicators<br />
Strategic Result Goals outline the significant results to be achieved over the next two to three years:<br />
Specific (Date Certain)<br />
Results Oriented<br />
Quantifiable & Measurable<br />
Informs community as to what to expect from the district<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012<br />
The percentages represent the percent responding “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” on the 2012 <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Customer Service Survey. The survey polled A<strong>ISD</strong> principals, central administration administrative and<br />
classified professional staff (positions interacting most with central staff) on four customer service<br />
statements:<br />
Staff are courteous;<br />
Staff respond in a timely manner;<br />
The department provides valuable services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, well-informed and expert in their areas.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 279
Public Relations and Multicultural Outreach<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief of Staff<br />
To proactively meet the communication and outreach needs of our stakeholders and contribute to the district’s mission of<br />
providing a quality education for all students<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 824,727 $ 954,469 $ 1,193,981<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 125,630 $ 147,700 $ 180,450<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 13,119 $ 7,392 $ 42,451<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 29,411 $ 44,448 $ 65,478<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total 992,887 1,154,009 1,482,360<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1,195,068<br />
339,800<br />
36,101<br />
62,478<br />
1,633,447<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 10.00 12.00 17.00 17.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Build stronger links between schools, families, parents, central administration and the community.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Increase awareness about the positive impact of reform efforts on schools and improve public perception.<br />
Improve the frequency and quality of linguistically and culturally effective communication.<br />
Develop and build awareness of the district’s key messages and brand.<br />
Partner with key grassroots leaders and organizations from <strong>Austin</strong> to promote parental engagement.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Number of A<strong>ISD</strong> web site front<br />
page views<br />
Total number of requests for<br />
translation and interpretation<br />
services<br />
14,354,564 14,789,334 15,528,801<br />
N/A TBD 15% increase<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Communication 90% 79% 81%<br />
Community Engagement 92% 86% 82%<br />
District Translation 96% 95% 98%<br />
Multicultural Outreach 94% 87% 84%<br />
Ombudsman 97% 95% 90%<br />
82%<br />
84%<br />
97%<br />
86%<br />
95%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 280
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Office of Innovation & Development (IAD)<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The mission of the Office of Innovation and Development is to:<br />
Reports to: Chief of Staff<br />
• Invest in Success: Expand collaborative partnerships to increase investment in successful models, address disparities, and<br />
accelerate change;<br />
• Streamline Systems & Services: Strengthen A<strong>ISD</strong>’s resource development processes to provide a clear and consistent set<br />
of support services for district staff and external partners to develop, participate in, and implement innovative initiatives;<br />
• Share the Impact: Raise the level of local, regional and national understanding of effective practices in education through the<br />
discussion and sharing of results to district, local, regional and national partners and educators.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 10,196 $ 136,000 $ 386,041<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
405,072<br />
80,500<br />
57,100<br />
15,400<br />
-<br />
Total $ 10,196 $ 161,000 $ 411,041<br />
$<br />
558,072<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 3.50 3.50 5.00 6.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Link partners with innovative educational reform efforts in the schools.<br />
* Identify and advise staff on funding and strategic partnership opportunities.<br />
Facilitate the development of successfully funded projects using local and national best-practice development and<br />
*<br />
fundraising models.<br />
*<br />
Provide support and coaching to all grant managers and administrators to implement, and report on grant activities and<br />
outcomes.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of projects awarded<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
62% 47% + 49% +<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Number of external strategic<br />
partners<br />
26 37 40<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Innovation and Development 89% 82% 81%<br />
78%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 281
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Internal Audit<br />
Reports to: Board of Trustees<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The mission of the Internal Audit Department is to provide independent and objective appraisals of financial, data processing,<br />
and other relevant matters within the District in order to assist management and employees in the effective discharge of their<br />
responsibilities by furnishing them with analyses, appraisals, recommendations, and pertinent comments concerning the<br />
activities reviewed.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 479,704 $ 481,004 $ 480,194<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 2,035 $ 2,500 $ 2,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 7,339 $ 4,500 $ 5,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 2,216 $ 6,905 $ 2,676<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
480,728<br />
2,000<br />
5,676<br />
2,000<br />
-<br />
Total $ 491,294 $ 494,909 $ 489,870<br />
$<br />
490,404<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Reviews and appraise controls and the reliability and integrity of financial, managerial and operating data.<br />
* Ascertain compliance with the District's policies and procedures.<br />
* Evaluate asset safeguards and accountability.<br />
* Evaluate the economy and efficiency with which resources are employed.<br />
* Review operations or programs to assess whether they are being carried out as planned.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percentage of audit projects<br />
completed according to planned<br />
timelines<br />
Average number of days to<br />
complete draft report after<br />
fieldwork complete<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
94% 96% 98%<br />
35* 30 25<br />
* estimate<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Internal Audit** N/A N/A N/A<br />
** will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
N/A<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 282
English<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District Language Arts Department is committed to develop and support the implementation<br />
of a rigorous, comprehensive language arts curriculum that is high-quality and challenging and ensures best teaching<br />
practices and equal access for each and every student.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 771,977 $ 628,822 $ 569,064<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 11,545 $ 22,737 $ 19,217<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 72,525 $ 25,171 $ 25,671<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 5,699 $ 11,615 $ 2,873<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 861,746 $ 688,345 $ 616,825<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1,423,403<br />
13,020<br />
27,421<br />
2,873<br />
-<br />
1,466,717<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 7.85 4.50 4.25 14.25<br />
Key Services<br />
* Align K-12 curriculum and support teachers in understanding ELA TEKS.<br />
* Support teachers in implementation of current ELA curriculum.<br />
* Identify and promote use of aligned instructional resources.<br />
* Develop model lessons for key standards.<br />
* Create curriculum-based assessments (benchmarks and SCAs) that align to STAAR indicators.<br />
* Design and deliver professional development for ELA teachers and reading specialists.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of the units in the<br />
English/Language Arts CRMs<br />
that have at least one TEKSaligned<br />
model lesson or portfolio<br />
of resources that target high need<br />
student expectations and/or<br />
readiness standards<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
60% 80% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of all E/LA (English)<br />
benchmark assessment items<br />
flagged for review by statistical<br />
analysis<br />
9% 7% 5%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
English/Language Arts 98% 85% 91%<br />
88%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 283
Social Studies<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The purpose of the <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Social Studies Curriculum Department headquartered at Central Administration is to provide<br />
teachers with the appropriate training, resources, and support that ensures the consistent delivery of rigorous and engaging<br />
instruction in social studies classrooms so that students acquire the standards-based knowledge and skills necessary for<br />
academic success as well as the habits of body and mind integral in the development of lifelong learners and productive<br />
citizens in an increasingly complex and diverse global society.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 611,330 $ 528,091 $ 479,106<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 26,165 $ 28,520 $ 23,680<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 11,969 $ 17,559 $ 16,784<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 21,497 $ 26,807 $ 10,092<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 670,961 $ 600,977 $ 529,662<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
436,304<br />
20,300<br />
18,964<br />
9,694<br />
-<br />
485,262<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 6.00 4.50 4.25 4.25<br />
Key Services<br />
* Align K-12 curriculum and support teachers in understanding social studies TEKS.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Support teachers in implementation of current social studies curriculum.<br />
Create model lessons for key standards.<br />
Create curriculum-based assessments that align to STAAR indicators.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of the units in the social<br />
studies CRMs that have at least<br />
one TEKS-aligned model lesson<br />
or portfolio of resources that<br />
target high need student<br />
expectations and/or readiness<br />
standards<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
73% 90% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of all Social Studies<br />
benchmark assessment items<br />
flagged for review by statistical<br />
analysis<br />
9% 7% 5%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Social Studies 99% 97% 95%<br />
96%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 284
Early Childhood<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District's Department of Early Childhood is committed to provide access to a comprehensive,<br />
evidence based cohesive program for prekindergarten and kindergarten students that will increase social emotional<br />
awareness and cultural proficiency and school readiness in young children.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 439,017 $ 267,781 $ 283,285<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 10,688 $ 8,865 $ 8,865<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 178,444 $ 238,481 $ 305,981<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 3,471 $ 4,350 $ 1,183<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 631,621 $ 519,477 $ 599,314<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
283,914<br />
9,445<br />
305,981<br />
1,283<br />
-<br />
600,623<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 2.50 2.50 5.50 5.50<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Provide early childhood support and resources for staff.<br />
Design and deliver professional development opportunities for pre-K and K teachers.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Number of ineligible children<br />
enrolled in prekindergarten<br />
Number of professional<br />
development courses offered on<br />
integrating technology in the<br />
prekindergarten and kindergarten<br />
classroom<br />
Number of professional<br />
development courses offered<br />
related to social and emotional<br />
development<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
11 10 5<br />
8 10 12<br />
16 18 20<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Early Childhood 100% 98% 99%<br />
100%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 285
Dyslexia/504 Program<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Dyslexia/504 Department is dedicated to ensuring that identified students are able to participate equally with<br />
their non-disabled peers and that appropriate supports are in place to foster high levels of student success.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 300,115 $ 272,100 $ 255,926<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 9,701 $ 13,601 $ 13,834<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 80,912 $ 68,936 $ 88,273<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 4,785 $ 4,073 $ 1,490<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 395,513 $ 358,710 $ 359,523<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
289,571<br />
13,834<br />
223,804<br />
2,451<br />
-<br />
529,660<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 3.00 3.00 3.00 4.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide training and monitoring support on compliance indicators and evaluation procedures based on Section 504 of the<br />
Rehabilitation Act and the State Dyslexia Handbook.<br />
*<br />
Provide guidance on instructional best practices for students with dyslexia within a tiered framework of support.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percentage of students served by<br />
Section 504 in compliance with<br />
504 requirements<br />
Percentage of dyslexia students<br />
served in compliance with<br />
Dyslexia requirements<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
86% 90% 100%<br />
89% 90% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
504 Dyslexia 96% 89% 91%<br />
93%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 286
Visual Arts<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The Visual Arts department provides students with the knowledge and skills necessary for cognitive, creative and social<br />
growth through the development of a rigorous and comprehensive visual art curriculum, and supports arts-rich schools in an<br />
arts rich district for the benefit of students, teachers, district employees, community arts partners, and community members.<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 85,184 $ 87,316 $ 78,741<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 5,080 $ 4,462 $ 4,114<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 6,370 $ 9,922 $ 9,922<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 22,670 $ 15,666 $ 11,420<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
76,900<br />
4,114<br />
11,854<br />
11,420<br />
-<br />
Total $ 119,303 $ 117,366 $ 104,197<br />
$<br />
104,288<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Develop/write/provide curriculum documents for visual arts.<br />
* Facilitate district-wide art exhibits/events.<br />
* Facilitate district-wide staff development/art workshops.<br />
* Provide support for transportation for student VASE events.<br />
* Design and deliver professional development.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of current Instructional<br />
Planning Guides (IPGs)<br />
transferred to Curriculum Road<br />
Maps (CRMs)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
0% 50% 87%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Visual Arts 97% 88% 97%<br />
95%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 287
Elementary Music<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The Elementary Music Department provides K - 12 students with the knowledge and skills necessary for cognitive, creative,<br />
and social growth through the development of a rigorous and comprehensive vocal music curriculum, and supports arts-rich<br />
schools in an arts rich district for the benefit of students, teachers, district employees, community arts partners, and<br />
community members.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 110,767 $ 110,182 $ 103,419<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 69,596 $ 82,374 $ 81,074<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 5,967 $ 18,525 $ 18,375<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 43,899 $ 35,219 $ 30,426<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
104,512<br />
81,074<br />
18,375<br />
30,426<br />
-<br />
Total $ 230,230 $ 246,300 $ 233,294<br />
$<br />
234,387<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Key Services<br />
* Develop/write/provide curriculum documents for elementary music and secondary choral music.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Assist in hiring and evaluating teachers.<br />
Provide staff development.<br />
Facilitate performances for students by the <strong>Austin</strong> arts community.<br />
Purchase digital pianos and major choral equipment for campuses.<br />
Provide transportation to UIL contests, district-wide events, and performances by the <strong>Austin</strong> arts community.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of current Instructional<br />
Planning Guides (IPGs)<br />
transferred to Curriculum Road<br />
Maps (CRMs)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
0% 36% 63%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Choir / Elementary Music 96% 87% 96%<br />
95%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 288
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Bilingual / ESL<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Dual Language is an academic program that enhances the development of bilingualism, biculturalism, and biliteracy so that<br />
students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,143,257 $ 1,113,952 $ 1,143,423<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 47,703 $ 44,500 $ 39,500<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 87,811 $ 224,922 $ 278,997<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 46,026 $ 19,790 $ 3,718<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1,267,068<br />
39,500<br />
409,729<br />
3,718<br />
-<br />
Total $ 1,324,797 $ 1,403,164 $ 1,465,638<br />
$<br />
1,720,015<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 11.64 10.58 10.94 10.94<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide and expand the Dual Language program in the District.<br />
* Design and provide Professional Development and ELPS trainings to Bilingual and ESL teachers.<br />
* Provide a district curriculum across content areas supporting the academic and language needs of ELLs.<br />
* Support the ELLs academic plan for the District.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of campuses<br />
implementing Dual Language with<br />
a proficient or exemplary rating<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
24% 50% 85%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of teachers on a TEA<br />
waiver that are ESL certified by<br />
the end of the school year<br />
50% 85% 90%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
English Language Learners 97% 82% 84%<br />
80%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 289
Science & Health Resource Center<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The mission of the <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Science and Health Resource Center is to work in partnership with schools, parents and the<br />
community to empower all students to engage in scientific inquiry, think critically and develop scientific literacy.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 456,267 $ 512,251 $ 437,874<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 5,947 $ 7,084 $ 10,600<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 220,050 $ 246,875 $ 305,812<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 22,326 $ 26,195 $ 20,067<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 704,590 $ 792,405 $ 774,353<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
458,835<br />
10,600<br />
285,679<br />
20,200<br />
-<br />
775,314<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 9.00 9.00 7.00 7.00<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Supply campuses with equipment and materials necessary to support science CRMs and instruction.<br />
Supply campuses with living materials necessary for science instruction.<br />
Provide a location for science professional development.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of science kits requested<br />
by elementary schools arriving at<br />
least one week prior to the<br />
scheduled applicable lesson<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percentage of time selected<br />
science equipment available for<br />
check out spends in middle and<br />
high school classrooms<br />
67% 75% 85%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
SHRC* N/A N/A N/A<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
N/A<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 290
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Advanced Academics<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Advanced Academic Services provides support for an array of programs including Gifted and Talented, Pre-AP and Advanced<br />
Placement program, Middle Years Program and International Baccalaureate, academic magnets and college readiness.<br />
Support is provided in the form of professional development for teachers, counselors, administrators, and parents;<br />
instructional resources and tools; curriculum documents; and compliance and monitoring of local, state, and national<br />
requirements.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 637,558 $ 664,139 $ 811,142 * $ 701,759<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 33,717 $ 18,300 $ 5,599 $ 5,100<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 39,505 $ 73,250 $ 55,170 $ 110,345<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 131,110 $ 76,000 $ 189,785 $ 167,249<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 841,889 $ 831,689 $ 1,061,696 $ 984,453<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.25<br />
* Advanced Placement Summer Institute Training<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Develop and publish resources and tools to support advanced academics.<br />
Design and deliver district and state-mandated professional development.<br />
Recruit and retain students in advanced academics.<br />
Provide awareness and support the structures for college readiness.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of The Texas State Plan<br />
for the Education of<br />
Gifted/Talented Students<br />
standards met<br />
Annual increase in number of<br />
teacher and staff participation in<br />
GT professional development<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
38% 50% 63%<br />
724 800 900<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Advanced Academics 98% 90% 90% 93%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 291
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Physical Education<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District’s Physical Education and Health Departments educate students to become<br />
lifelong learners of health and wellness by participating in activities that develop behaviors which encourage<br />
healthy decision-making, appropriate social skills, and lifelong physical fitness in and outside of the educational<br />
setting.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 189,145 $ 163,481 $ 148,289<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 2,334 $ 8,280 $ 7,189<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 57,657 $ 60,601 $ 66,450<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 5,440 $ 4,066 $ 1,120<br />
Equipment (6600) $ 19,800 $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
148,380<br />
7,189<br />
71,450<br />
1,120<br />
-<br />
Total $ 274,375 $ 236,428 $ 223,048<br />
$<br />
228,139<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00<br />
Note: FTEs Include 5.00 Itinery Adaptive PE Instructors allocated to campuses<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide support for coordinated school health education, family and community involvement, safe and healthy school<br />
environment, health services, nutrition services, and staff wellness.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Develop and deliver Brain Breaks and other physical activities.<br />
Design and deliver professional development for physical education and adapted physical education teachers.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of grades 3-12<br />
Curriculum Road Maps (CRMs)<br />
aligned, completed and available<br />
via Schoolnet<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
74% 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Annual number of campus<br />
teacher contacts<br />
38 50 60<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Physical Education 98% 96% 96%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 292
General Fund Expenditures<br />
World Languages<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The World Languages Department strives to help students become successful, lifelong global communicators in the 21st<br />
century by delivering and supporting a rigorous curriculum that leads to demonstrated proficiency in a second language and a<br />
deep awareness and understanding of the culture being studied.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 19,504 $ 84,169 $ 83,412<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 18 $ 1,380 $ 1,200<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 40,467 $ 38,195 $ 48,205<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 17,470 $ 21,904 $ 7,769<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
83,504<br />
9,200<br />
39,855<br />
6,550<br />
-<br />
Total $ 77,459 $ 145,648 $ 140,586<br />
$<br />
139,109<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Develop, implement and evaluate foreign language curriculum.<br />
* Coordinate and provide professional development for instructional improvement.<br />
* Collaborate with teachers to promote instructional consistency and a shared vision.<br />
* Manage the budget and provides resources on effective language instruction.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percentage of target language<br />
use in Languages Other Than<br />
English classrooms<br />
46% 75% 90%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
World Languages 98% 98% 95%<br />
99%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 293
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Response to Intervention<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The Department of Response to Intervention (RtI) supports a rigorous RtI framework inclusive of evidence based culturally and<br />
linguistically responsive instruction, assessment, and evidence based intervention. The A<strong>ISD</strong> comprehensive Response to<br />
Intervention Framework supports the goals within the A<strong>ISD</strong> Strategic Plan.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ - $ - $ 91,969<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ - $ - $ 3,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ - $ - $ 17,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
91,969<br />
3,000<br />
263,063<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Total $ - $ - $ 111,969<br />
$<br />
358,032<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE - - 1.00 1.00<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Support a preventative multi-tiered instructional and behavior framework for all learners by improving differentiated<br />
instruction, interventions, resources, and training.<br />
Professional development for implementation of the RtI framework.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of TLI vertical team<br />
grade 3-9 students improving<br />
from 25th percentile at EOY for<br />
reading to be determined by the<br />
Maze Universal Screener in<br />
AIMSweb<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
21% 15% 20%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent increase in attendance at<br />
sessions supporting training and<br />
professional development in the<br />
use of a universal screener and<br />
progress monitoring instrument<br />
grades K-12 for math and reading<br />
275 50% 60%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Response to Intervention (RTI) 97% 90% 92%<br />
94%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 294
T<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Performing Arts<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The Performing Arts Department provides K - 12 students with the knowledge and skills necessary for cognitive, creative, and<br />
social growth through the development of rigorous and comprehensive band, orchestra, theatre and dance curricula, and<br />
supports arts-rich schools in an arts-rich district for the benefit of students, teachers, district employees, community arts<br />
partners, and community members.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 190,447 $ 177,330 $ 166,105<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 39,441 $ 19,872 $ 21,152<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 12,306 $ 332,193 $ 321,442<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 210,419 $ 219,733 $ 218,442<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
166,234<br />
21,152<br />
351,439<br />
218,442<br />
-<br />
Total $ 452,612 $ 749,128 $ 727,141<br />
$<br />
757,267<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Develop and provide sustained and coordinated professional development.<br />
Develop/write/provide curriculum that promotes creativity, critical thinking and artistic competencies.<br />
Provide support and resources for UIL, TMEA, TBA, TODA, TETA, TDEA , and VASE events.<br />
Build and expand community support for fine arts programs.<br />
Provide updated educational specs for the new Performing Arts Center and recommendations on the design.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of current Instructional<br />
Planning Guides (IPGs)<br />
transferred to Curriculum Road<br />
Maps (CRMs)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
0% 27% 63%<br />
Band, Orchestra, Dance and<br />
Theatre<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
94% 85% 98%<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
94%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 295
Social and Emotional Learning<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) ensures that children and adults are engaged life-long learners who are self-aware,<br />
caring and connected to others, and responsible in their decision-making.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Total $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
31,855<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
31,855<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 0.50<br />
Key Services<br />
* Develop and publish resources to support social and emotional learning for campus and community.<br />
* Design and deliver professional development.<br />
* Provide professional coaching support for schools implementing social and emotional learning.<br />
* Write social and emotional learning curriculum documents.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of SEL schools reporting<br />
receiving adequate professional<br />
development and coaching to<br />
promote SEL development in<br />
their school<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
69% 71% 73%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of SEL schools reporting<br />
receiving adequate materials and<br />
curricular resources to promote<br />
SEL development in their school<br />
72% 74% 76%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Social and Emotional Learning 98% 95% 87%<br />
93%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 296
Science<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The mission of the <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Department of Science is to work in partnership with schools, parents and the community to<br />
empower all students to engage in scientific inquiry, think critically and develop scientific literacy.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 928,853 $ 742,181 $ 644,307<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 58,404 $ 86,138 $ 78,554<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 424,329 $ 628,480 $ 599,850<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 178,308 $ 99,032 $ 85,936<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,589,893 $ 1,555,831 $ 1,408,647<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
661,369<br />
73,554<br />
598,190<br />
85,936<br />
-<br />
1,419,049<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 5.00 4.50 4.25 4.25<br />
Key Services<br />
* Align K-12 curriculum and support teachers in understanding science TEKS.<br />
* Support teachers in implementation of current science curriculum.<br />
* Create model lessons for key standards.<br />
* Create curriculum-based assessments that align to STAAR indicators.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of the units in the Science<br />
CRMs that have at least one<br />
TEKS-aligned model lesson or<br />
portfolio of resources that target<br />
high need student expectations<br />
and/or readiness standards<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
72% 90% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of all Science benchmark<br />
assessment items flagged for<br />
review by statistical analysis 12% 9% 6%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Science 98% 90% 90%<br />
88%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 297
Math<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The mission of the Mathematics Curriculum Department is to create a user-friendly curriculum that is horizontally and<br />
vertically aligned, provides flexible resources for instruction in deep, rigorous mathematics for all students, and tightly aligns<br />
assessment to the specificity in the curriculum.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 780,161 $ 590,965 $ 573,249<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 108,510 $ 95,220 $ 95,220<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 508,677 $ 523,017 $ 518,474<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 35,310 $ 9,948 $ 3,362<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,432,657 $ 1,219,150 $ 1,190,305<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
573,496<br />
86,220<br />
518,474<br />
9,000<br />
-<br />
1,187,190<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 6.95 4.50 4.25 4.25<br />
Key Services<br />
* Align K-12 curriculum and support teachers in understanding revised math TEKS.<br />
* Support teachers in implementation of current mathematics curriculum.<br />
* Create model lessons for key standards.<br />
* Create curriculum-based assessments that align to STAAR indicators.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of the units in the math<br />
CRMs that have at least one<br />
TEKS-aligned model lesson or<br />
portfolio of resources that target<br />
high need student expectations<br />
and/or readiness standards<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of all Math benchmark<br />
assessment items flagged for<br />
review by statistical analysis 9% 7% 5%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Mathematics 98% 90% 90%<br />
90%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 298
Special Programs<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The core value in the Division of Special Programs is respect for the individual. Fostering and modeling the development of<br />
respect for all individuals regardless of race, national origin, creed, language barrier, disability, or other personal attributes is<br />
the goal of our department. Our mission is for all students to progress academically and intellectually, and graduate prepared<br />
for personal success and inspired to contribute to society. In addition, it is our vision that in partnership with our community,<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will be recognized for providing each student with a rigorous education.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 26,894 $ 129,726 $ 152,277<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ - $ 10,000 $ 6,800<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ - $ 15,000 $ 13,200<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ 5,000 $ 2,514<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 26,894 $ 159,726 $ 174,791<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
152,461<br />
6,800<br />
12,200<br />
3,514<br />
-<br />
174,975<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Ensure that the program for ELLs is research based; fully designed, supported and monitored.<br />
* Ensure that the Special Education standards for instruction support differentiation.<br />
* Provide advanced level and/or differentiated services to gifted students by trained staff.<br />
* Provide opportunities for students to effectively communicate in a second language.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of campuses<br />
implementing Dual Language<br />
with a proficient or exemplary<br />
rating<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
24% 50% 85%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percentage of students with<br />
disabilities (SWD) served 80% or<br />
more of their day in general<br />
education<br />
59.86% 62.90% 66.00%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Division of Special Programs 95% 85% 84%<br />
82%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 299
Special Education<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The Department of Special Education exists to support campus implementation of services to students with disabilities<br />
through educator empowerment and parent partnership by designing and delivering quality instructional and compliance tools.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,502,620 $ 1,396,667 $ 1,166,851<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 15,472 $ 48,000 $ 15,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 93,088 $ 46,164 $ 47,701<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 9,359 $ 3,844 $ 2,025<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$ 1,168,560<br />
$ 14,400<br />
$ 44,982<br />
$ 5,344<br />
$ -<br />
Total $ 1,620,540 $ 1,494,675 $ 1,231,577<br />
$<br />
1,233,286<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 18.80 18.80 17.80 17.80<br />
Key Services<br />
Design and deliver instructional supports and tools for campus implementation of rigorous instruction to students with<br />
* disabilities.<br />
Design and deliver compliance supports and tools for campus compliance with state and federal regulations for students<br />
* with disabilities.<br />
*<br />
Design and deliver support and tools to all campuses for partnering with parents of students with disabilities.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percentage of students with<br />
disabilities (SWD) served 80% or<br />
more of their day in general<br />
education<br />
Percent of admission, review and<br />
dismissal (ARD) committee<br />
meetings with parent in<br />
attendance<br />
Baseline<br />
FY2012<br />
Targets<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
59.86% 62.90% 66.00%<br />
77% 80% 83%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Special Education 96% 86% 93%<br />
89%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 300
Special Ed Assessment<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
The Department of Special Education Assessment exists to design and deliver quality supports to students, educators,<br />
families and the community for the success of students with disabilities.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 688,962 $ 763,002 $ 792,077<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 404 $ 5,902 $ -<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 40,906 $ 20,696 $ 17,648<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 929 $ 829 $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 731,200 $ 790,429 $ 809,725<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
793,687<br />
-<br />
17,648<br />
-<br />
-<br />
811,335<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 11.37 11.37 11.37 11.37<br />
Key Services<br />
* Conducts Full and Individual Evaluations and Reevaluations to address areas of suspected disability.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Collaborates with campus and central office general and special education administrators related to special education<br />
disability determination.<br />
Assist in the development of individualized education programs for individuals with special education needs.<br />
Ensure compliance with federal and state special education laws including Individuals with Disabilities Education Act<br />
(IDEA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).<br />
Interpret special education evaluations for teachers, counselors, and other service providers.<br />
Responsible for the recruitment, selection, assignment, supervision and appraisal of evaluation staff.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Referral rate for African American<br />
students to special education 12.42% 12.00% 11.60%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent of ARDs held within<br />
federal guidelines (Early<br />
Childhood Transition)<br />
99.10% 99.50% 100%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent of children with parental<br />
consent to evaluate who were<br />
evaluated within 90 days<br />
97.70% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
* See Special Education (LOC 841)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 301
Special Education AH/VH<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The Services for Visually Impaired exists to provide services for students with visual impairments, families, and schools to<br />
promote success in education, careers, independent living, social relationships, and the broader community.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100)* $ 1,754,166 $ 1,747,772 $ 1,554,413<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 1,933 $ 3,400 $ 68,200<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 2,285 $ 1,700 $ 1,700<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 2,285 $ - $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,760,669 $ 1,752,872 $ 1,624,313<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1,680,275<br />
3,400<br />
3,900<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1,687,575<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
*Salary includes Itinery teachers 15 Occupational Therapist/Physical Therapist and 9 Visually Impaired teachers.<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Recruit, interview, train, appraise staff for services for visually impaired.<br />
Management of office for services for visually impaired and regional day school program for the deaf.<br />
Maintain budget, purchases and flow through funds for low incidence services.<br />
Conduct evaluations and direct instruction for students with visual impairments.<br />
Assign responsibilities and problem solve critical cases.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of students with parental<br />
consent to evaluate who were<br />
evaluated within 90 days (AI/VI<br />
only)<br />
Percentage of itinerant supported<br />
services for students with AI or VI<br />
that are implemented as written in<br />
their IEP<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
* See Special Education (LOC 841)<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 302
CATE<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
To provide opportunities for students to acquire 21st century academic and technical skills needed for entry into the global<br />
workforce and/or postsecondary education in order to become contributing members of their community.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100)* $ 18,215 $ 3,588 $ 220,151<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 728,151 $ 762,152 $ 866,952<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 99,502 $ 4,062 $ 1,380,556<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 96,114 $ 97,155 $ 164,484<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 941,982 $ 866,957 $ 2,632,143<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
170,761<br />
867,781<br />
1,372,649<br />
221,562<br />
-<br />
2,632,753<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE - - - -<br />
*Extra Duty Stipends and Substitutes<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Provide oversight for CTE programs.<br />
Supervise compliance with district, state and federal guidelines.<br />
Design and deliver professional development for teachers.<br />
Develop/write/provide curriculum documents for CTE courses.<br />
Provide curriculum support to CTE teachers.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent change in the number of<br />
students attaining industry<br />
certification or licensure<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
118% 10% 5%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of students eligible for<br />
college credit through articulated<br />
CTE courses<br />
26% 28% 30%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Career and Technology (CTE) 98% 95% 98%<br />
96%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 303
Library Media Center<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The mission of the A<strong>ISD</strong> Library Media Center is to provide resources and access to information and media-related<br />
services for A<strong>ISD</strong> staff, to support professional development and best practices initiatives; and to provide technical and<br />
technology support for campus libraries and thus assist librarians in nurturing a life-long appreciation of reading and<br />
learning by assuring that students and staff have opportunities for successful access, evaluation and use of information<br />
and libraries.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 943,824 $ 964,317 $ 963,708<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 125,494 $ 146,760 $ 146,760<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 398,198 $ 259,500 $ 259,500<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 1,272 $ 2,000 $ 676<br />
Equipment (6600) $ 6,608 $ 7,235 $ 7,235<br />
Total $ 1,475,396 $ 1,379,812 $ 1,377,879<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
964,947<br />
158,366<br />
286,000<br />
1,500<br />
7,235<br />
1,418,048<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 14.00 14.00 13.00 13.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide leadership, staff development, support and monitoring of A<strong>ISD</strong> library program.<br />
* Supervise maintenance of automation software/hardware.<br />
* Promote instruction in technology skills and use of online resources.<br />
* Acquire, circulate, and promote professional collection of information resources for A<strong>ISD</strong> staff.<br />
* Supervise bid process for materials/equipment.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of time library<br />
automated library system is<br />
available<br />
Percent of librarians whose<br />
EOY reports reflect purchases<br />
to address deficiencies<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
99% 96%-99% 97%-100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Number of campuses hosting<br />
summer reading programs<br />
35 38 41<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Educational, and Information<br />
Technology (Libraries)<br />
99% 98% 99%<br />
99%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 304
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Health Services<br />
Reports to: Chief Academic Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District’s Physical Education and Health Departments educate students to become<br />
lifelong learners of health and wellness by participating in activities that develop behaviors which encourage<br />
healthy decision-making, appropriate social skills, and lifelong physical fitness in and outside of the educational<br />
setting.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 506,742 $ 512,097 $ 509,589<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 4,540,453 $ 5,218,423 $ 5,353,476<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 7,750 $ 38,000 $ 38,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 2,662 $ - $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
510,774<br />
5,525,576<br />
68,000<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Total $ 5,057,607 $ 5,768,520 $ 5,901,065<br />
$<br />
6,104,350<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00<br />
Key Services<br />
Support for coordinated school health education, family and community involvement, safe and healthy school environment,<br />
*<br />
health services, nutrition services, and staff wellness.<br />
Identify homeless, mobile, pregnant, and other students with special needs and ensure they receive consistent access to<br />
*<br />
curriculum and appropriate services.<br />
* Provide comprehensive, aligned, evidence based, rigorous health education.<br />
* Provide opportunities for staff wellness.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of Science and Health<br />
Department heads attending<br />
professional development<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
80% 85% 90%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of students who access<br />
school health care for a breathing<br />
episode, who do not have a care<br />
plan<br />
29% 29% 28%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Health Services 98% 94% 94%<br />
97%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 305
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Student Services<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The primary function of the Office of Student Services/Records is to provide the key services listed below. In addition to<br />
those services, the Office is responsible for the administration of District trustee, bond and tax ratification elections that are<br />
held by Travis County Elections.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 506,624 $ 455,349 $ 489,961 $ 490,554<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 23,390 $ 37,090 $ 37,090 $ 37,090<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 19,542 $ 29,187 $ 30,559 $ 30,559<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 1,297 $ 3,347 $ 536 $ 536<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 550,852 $ 524,973 $ 558,146 $ 558,739<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Manage registration/enrollment and attendance maintenance procedures for the District.<br />
* Implement the transfer policy.<br />
Implement all other assignment processes (e.g., NCLB, PEG, Diversity Choice, reassignments due to boundary<br />
*<br />
changes, etc.<br />
* Serve as the records custodian for the District.<br />
* Provide student projections for the District.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Annual projected total enrollment<br />
for first six weeks will be within<br />
one percent of actual enrollment<br />
for the first six weeks<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
1.10%
Educational Support Services<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong>'s Learning Support Services Department supports the Dropout Prevention Specialists' (DPS) efforts. DPSs work<br />
with campus principals and staff to promote positive school attendance, identify truant students early and create effective<br />
intervention strategies to increase attendance and high school graduation. They are key members of the Child Study<br />
System Teams. Through Child Study System Team meetings DPS work with campus staff to make data driven decisions<br />
about students with attendance issues and help to establish effective interventions. DPS also work directly with students<br />
and parents to increase attendance and high school graduation.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 385,254 $ 687,740 $ 205,672<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 897,236 $ 857,136 $ 283,828<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 15,291 $ 17,503 $ 109,677<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 8,334 $ 11,794 $ 8,599<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,306,115 $ 1,574,173 $ 607,776<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
220,868<br />
229,749<br />
4,381<br />
8,599<br />
-<br />
463,597<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.00 4.00 1.00 2.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Campus DPS provide parent training regarding compulsory attendance laws.<br />
* Campus DPS connect high school dropouts to alternative education programs as needed.<br />
Campus DPS serve on Child Study Systems Teams and assist in creating effective interventions.<br />
* Maintain updated list of A<strong>ISD</strong> alternative education programs and provide staff development for DPS.<br />
* Create systematic best practice systems to increase attendance & graduation rates and reduce leaver rates.<br />
Provide systematic best practice training for DPS, attendance specialists and designated administrators.<br />
*<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percentage of students with<br />
District DPS eCST record within<br />
10 working days of reaching 10<br />
unexcused day absences<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
10% 30% 65%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percentage of students with<br />
District DPS eCST record within<br />
10 working days of campus<br />
initiated administrative withdrawal<br />
22% 30% 65%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable,<br />
well-informed, and expert<br />
in their area<br />
Educational Support<br />
N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />
Services*<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 307
Delta / NovaNet<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The Department of School, Family and Community Education will provide a broad array of comprehensive educational<br />
programs and services that will complement and best address the academic and support service needs of A<strong>ISD</strong> students<br />
through the use of a collaborative, shared partnership with families and community members to ensure the schooling success<br />
of all learners.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 249,019 $ 275,242 $ 296,731<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 7,600 $ 5,800 $ 4,200<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 403,965 $ 403,985 $ 404,732<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 1,844 $ 4,487 $ 2,135<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 662,428 $ 689,514 $ 707,798<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
265,168<br />
4,200<br />
475,482<br />
1,385<br />
-<br />
746,235<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide a self-paced alternative instructional option for high school students for credit recovery and accrual.<br />
* Offer home-based instructional option for teen parents unable to attend traditional school.<br />
* Create an open-entry/open-exit instructional environment for students in grades 9-12.<br />
* Provide on-line AP/Dual Credit option for high school students at no cost.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percentage of high school<br />
DELTA teachers trained to use<br />
curriculum, curriculum updates,<br />
and data systems provided<br />
through the Pearson NovaNet<br />
system<br />
Annual percentage increase in<br />
the number of graduates in<br />
DELTA<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
96% 97% 98%<br />
1.75% 2% 2%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
DELTA* N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 308
Guidance & Counseling<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The mission of the A<strong>ISD</strong> School Counselors is to implement a comprehensive developmental guidance and<br />
counseling program promoting success for all students through a focus on academic achievement, prevention and<br />
intervention activities, advocacy, and social/emotional and career development.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 276,162 $ 294,919 $ 123,543<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 29,472 $ 68,050 $ 70,625<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 148,230 $ 175,596 $ 84,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 15,216 $ 5,645 $ 6,600<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 469,080 $ 544,210 $ 284,768<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
86,278<br />
89,725<br />
274,000<br />
5,000<br />
-<br />
455,003<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Design and deliver professional development.<br />
* Design and deliver classroom guidance presentations.<br />
* Provide individual and group counseling.<br />
* Provide support for individual college and career planning.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of CTE high school<br />
students taking a coherent<br />
course sequence who have a<br />
4-yr plan<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
33% 60% 75%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of 5th grade students<br />
completing an Individual<br />
Academic Career Plan unit<br />
43% 50% 65%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable,<br />
well-informed, and expert in<br />
their area<br />
Guidance, Counseling &<br />
Student Intervention<br />
99% 96% 97%<br />
95%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 309
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Learning Support Services<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
Learning Support Services provides support to campuses and students through the child study teams in: social work,<br />
professional development, defining academic/behavior and attendance interventions and the development and enhancement<br />
of the advanced case management system eCST. This system provides progress monitoring, an early warning system for<br />
students who are starting to struggle, service tracking of all support received, and a case management system for students<br />
receiving wrap-around support.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100)* $ 1,332,521 $ 1,592,516 $ 1,020,294<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 783,550 $ 839,200 $ 814,762<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 22,838 $ 55,213 $ 20,291<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 26,271 $ 30,554 $ 5,102<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1,021,658<br />
814,762<br />
20,291<br />
5,102<br />
-<br />
Total $ 2,165,179 $ 2,517,483 $ 1,860,449<br />
$<br />
1,861,813<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 20.25 20.25 34.00 56.00<br />
*FTEs include 22 AAFR discipline positions of which salaries will be charged to campuses<br />
Key Services<br />
* Support district-wide system of campus Child Study Teams.<br />
* Design and deliver professional development.<br />
* Provide social work services for students and families.<br />
* Coordinate services with community agencies.<br />
* Provide support for critical incidents.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of eCST eligible users<br />
who have at least one entry using<br />
service tracking<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
33% 60% 80%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of goals in eCST that are<br />
measureable and appropriate 19% 25% 50%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Learning Support Services 94% 96% 94%<br />
93%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 310
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 274,349 $ 400,056 $ 476,589 $ 1,802,283 *<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 1,921 $ 10,000 $ 9,200 $ 9,200<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 107,241 $ 89,209 $ 94,747 $ 98,325<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 167,726 $ 131,538 $ 86,237 $ 250,300<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 551,237 $ 630,803 $ 666,773 $ 2,160,108<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20<br />
* Extra Duty funds to be disbursed to campuses.<br />
Key Services<br />
* Increase college applications and acceptances of A<strong>ISD</strong> students, particularly first-generation college goers.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
AVID-College Readiness<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> AVID Department works in the <strong>Austin</strong> schools to close the achievement gap in our community by increasing<br />
college readiness among all students and by preparing all students for success in a global society.<br />
Ensure high-quality, rigorous instruction in critical reading, writing, note-taking and organizational skills, as well as<br />
career/college exploration, time management, leadership, and personal responsibility.<br />
Provide tutors to work with students in small groups in the AVID class to build academic success in core classes.<br />
Provide ongoing training, coaching, and support to AVID schools and teachers.<br />
Fund AVID site licenses, working with schools to ensure compliance with AVID standards and qualification for AVID<br />
Certified status each year.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of AVID campuses that<br />
are annually certified<br />
Percent of AVID students who<br />
have stayed in the AVID program<br />
(year- to-year)<br />
Percent of AVID Seniors<br />
accepted to a 4-year<br />
college/university<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
83% 90% 95%<br />
71% 75% 80%<br />
81% 85% 95%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
The percent of AVID 8th graders<br />
enrolled in Algebra I 28% 35% 40%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
AVID* N/A N/A N/A<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
N/A<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 311
School Turnaround Initiative<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
To collectively build a robust portfolio of high performing turnaround schools to rapidly accelerate student<br />
achievement as part of the District's overall education plan for all students, especially the District's most<br />
chronically under-performing schools.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ - $ 1,624,911 * $ 1,314,503<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ - $ 294,507 $ -<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ - $ - $ 4,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ - $ 4,000<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ - $ 1,919,418 $ 1,322,503<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
259,846<br />
300,000<br />
46,466<br />
4,000<br />
-<br />
610,312<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 1.50 2.00 2.00<br />
*Extra Duty Salary for high dosage tutoring<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide support to and assist with development of vertically-aligned signature programs.<br />
Research programs and school models that address critical district needs and/or address needs of schools<br />
*<br />
struggling to meet state and federal accountability standards.<br />
Coordinate and facilitate implementation of approved programs and school models (e.g., high dosage<br />
*<br />
tutoring (HDT) at eight schools and signature program support for three vertical teams).<br />
*<br />
Convene internal and external work groups to assist with program development, implementation and<br />
evaluation.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Percent of 3rd gr. students<br />
performing on grade level in reading<br />
Effectiveness for campuses supported by HDT 34% 50.5% 62.9%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of 6th gr. students<br />
performing on grade level Math<br />
(AIMSWeb-CAP) for non-TTIPS<br />
campuses supported by HDT<br />
44% 58.0% 68.5%<br />
Percent of 6th gr. students<br />
Effectiveness<br />
performing on grade level Math<br />
(AIMSWeb-COMP) for non-TTIPS<br />
41% 55.7% 77.8%<br />
campuses supported by HDT<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of 9th gr. students<br />
performing on grade level in Algebra<br />
I for non-TTIPS campuses<br />
supported by HDT<br />
73% 79.7% 84.7%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
School Turnaround* N/A N/A N/A<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
N/A<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 312
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Athletics<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The Department of Athletics provides a rigorous athletic program to A<strong>ISD</strong> Middle Schools and High Schools which complements<br />
and supports a challenging academic program by teaching students to persevere, to work well with others, and to test<br />
themselves.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,441,056 $ 2,263,792 $ 2,278,163 $ 2,155,722<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 1,067,180 $ 900,686 $ 858,050 $ 1,012,373<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 332,457 $ 325,700 $ 278,300 $ 257,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 979,203 $ 943,000 $ 684,047 $ 671,400<br />
Equipment (6600) $ 129,153 $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 4,949,050 $ 4,433,178 $ 4,098,560<br />
$<br />
4,096,495<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 27.00 27.00 27.00 27.00<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Organize and Supervise educationally sound athletic programs.<br />
Inspire students to become productive citizens, successful students and effective leaders.<br />
Provide a safe and healthy environment for all athletic related activities.<br />
Contract, supervise and secure central athletic facilities when rented by non-district, non-profit organizations.<br />
Supervise, staff, secure and account for A<strong>ISD</strong> athletic competitions held at central facilities.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of middle school students<br />
participating in Athletics<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
60.0% 63.2% 64.3%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of high school students<br />
participating in Athletics<br />
40.0% 41.2% 42.3%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent of coaches current on<br />
first aid, CPR/AED, and<br />
concussion training<br />
Amount of funds used for game<br />
help expenses at competitions<br />
held at central facilities<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
$628,901 < $864,270 < $846,450<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their area<br />
Department of Athletics 96% 95% 98%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 313
School, Family & Community Education<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The Department of School, Family and Community Education will provide a broad array of comprehensive educational<br />
programs and services that will complement and best address the academic and support services needs of A<strong>ISD</strong> students<br />
through the use of a collaborative, shared partnership with families and community members to ensure the schooling<br />
success of all learners.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 1,246,839 $ 1,166,744 $ 984,032<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 114,037 $ 166,375 $ 910,780<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 40,139 $ 46,251 $ 44,663<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 20,519 $ 16,123 $ 3,101<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,421,534 $ 1,395,493 $ 1,942,576<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
1,764,210<br />
964,318<br />
49,063<br />
16,921<br />
-<br />
2,794,512<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 14.80 12.90 19.20 24.20<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide oversight for community use of district facilities.<br />
* Create learning opportunities for families to be more actively engaged in learning at school/home/community.<br />
* Provide child care service to increase holding power of teen parents.<br />
* Maintain partnerships with organizations to provide support services for students.<br />
* Offer educational options for students to meet promotion/graduation standards.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Efficiency<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Annual revenue from grants and<br />
facility use fees<br />
Number of students participating<br />
in programs designed to meet<br />
grade promotion and graduation<br />
standards<br />
$8,522,297 $8.6M $8.6M<br />
18,792 18,792 18,792<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
School, Family & Community<br />
Education<br />
93% 88% 94%<br />
91%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 314
Associate Superintendent-High Schools<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The mission of the Office of High Schools is to provide leadership in all aspects of operations for all high school Principals,<br />
Assistant Principals, and staff in order to provide a rigorous and well rounded educational experience for <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>'s high<br />
school students and families ensuring that all students graduate and are ready to excel in college and career.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 499,274 $ 608,558 $ 674,442 $ 769,467<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 260,560 $ 359,135 $ 358,631 $ 1,475,913 *<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 14,967 $ 46,150 $ 28,150<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 30,655 $ 6,696 $ 1,120<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
27,150<br />
1,120<br />
-<br />
Total $ 805,456 $ 1,020,539 $ 1,062,343<br />
$<br />
2,273,650<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.00 4.00 8.00 9.00<br />
*Early College funds to be allocated to campuses<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Lead administrative teams at all campuses in the development and delivery of curricular and academic goals.<br />
Lead the staff selection and capacity building of Principals, Assistant Principals, and instructional leaders.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Provide effective instructional tools for the implementation of programs and strategies to support high quality instruction.<br />
Monitor the performance and progress of student performance, discipline, campus budgets, and staff.<br />
Provide strong and effective interventions and adjustments based on data-informed decisions.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Graduation rate<br />
80%<br />
(Class of 10-11)<br />
85%<br />
(Class of 11-12)<br />
87%<br />
(Class of 12-13)<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of instructional<br />
leadership professional<br />
development participants who<br />
indicate that the professional<br />
development delivered was of<br />
high quality<br />
91% 93% 95%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of A<strong>ISD</strong> high school<br />
campuses rated Academically<br />
Acceptable or better<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Office of High Schools 95% 90% 94%<br />
95%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 315
Associate Superintendent - Area 1<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The Area 1 Schools Office monitors student achievement at the 36 Area 1 campuses to ensure that all students are<br />
performing at or above grade level and that all schools will meet or exceed state and federal accountability standards. The<br />
Office develops and strengthens leadership capacity in campus principals in order to ensure students receive an educational<br />
experience that is academically rigorous, culturally relevant, and healthful so that they are well-prepared for college, career,<br />
and life in a globally competitive economy.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 456,377 $ 592,521 $ 745,407<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 2,316 $ 4,000 $ 4,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 12,904 $ 28,927 $ 26,295<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 2,119 $ 4,300 $ 1,345<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 473,716 $ 629,748 $ 777,047<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
654,747<br />
4,000<br />
25,772<br />
1,500<br />
-<br />
686,019<br />
Key Services 3.00 4.00 7.20 7.20<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Systemically monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of the written curriculum.<br />
Assist in developing an action plan inclusive of both core instruction and interventions in response to student achievement<br />
data.<br />
Provide job-embedded professional development support to principals and leadership teams to ensure effective delivery of<br />
instruction.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of Area 1 elementary<br />
school campuses rated<br />
Academically Acceptable or<br />
better<br />
Percent of Area 1 middle school<br />
campuses rated Academically<br />
Acceptable or better<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of Area 1 K-2 students<br />
reading on or above grade level<br />
on district reading assessment<br />
(DRA)<br />
79% 85%<br />
90%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Office of Schools – Area 1 90% 92% 93%<br />
92%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 316
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Associate Superintendent - Area 2<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The Area 2 Schools Office monitors student achievement at the 34 Area 2 campuses to ensure that all students are<br />
performing at or above grade level and that all schools will meet or exceed state and federal accountability standards. The<br />
Office develops and strengthens leadership capacity in campus principals in order to ensure students receive an educational<br />
experience that is academically rigorous, culturally relevant, and healthful so that they are well-prepared for college, career,<br />
and life in a globally competitive economy.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 257,256 $ 192,609 $ 376,728<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 251 $ 5,100 $ 5,100<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 3,840 $ 30,581 $ 28,581<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 10,596 $ 3,145 $ 1,401<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
376,868<br />
7,400<br />
26,281<br />
1,401<br />
-<br />
Total $ 271,943 $ 231,435 $ 411,810<br />
$<br />
411,950<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 3.00 4.20 7.20 7.20<br />
Key Services<br />
* Systematically monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of the written curriculum.<br />
Assist in developing an action plan inclusive of both instruction and interventions in response to student achievement data<br />
* as it becomes available.<br />
Provide job-embedded professional development support to principals and leadership teams to ensure effective delivery of<br />
* instruction.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of Area 2 elementary<br />
school campuses rated<br />
Academically Acceptable or<br />
better<br />
Percent of Area 2 middle school<br />
campuses rated Academically<br />
Acceptable or better<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of Area 2 K-2 students<br />
reading on or above grade level<br />
on district reading assessment<br />
(DRA)<br />
73% 85%<br />
90%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Office of Schools – Area 2 88% 91% 93%<br />
92%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 317
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Associate Superintendent - Area 3<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Schools Officer<br />
The Area 3 Schools Office monitors student achievement at the 29 Area 3 campuses to ensure that all students<br />
are performing at or above grade level and that all schools will meet or exceed state and federal accountability<br />
standards. The Office develops and strengthens leadership capacity in campus principals in order to ensure<br />
students receive an educational experience that is academically rigorous, culturally relevant, and healthful so that<br />
they are well-prepared for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 741,792 $ 1,976,155 * $ 2,068,236<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 235,878 $ 25,500 $ 136,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 28,555 $ 770,916 $ 523,100<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 62,363 $ 35,321 $ 7,973<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
2,110,620<br />
136,000<br />
851,218<br />
7,964<br />
-<br />
Total $ 1,068,589 $ 2,807,892 $ 2,735,309<br />
$<br />
3,105,802<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.00 4.00 7.00 7.00<br />
*Salary includes Extra Duty Middle School Programs (Read/Math Initiative, Struggling Learners)<br />
Key Services<br />
* Systematically monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of the written curriculum.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Assist in developing an action plan inclusive of both instruction and interventions in response to student<br />
achievement data as it becomes available.<br />
Provide job-embedded professional development support to principals and leadership teams to ensure<br />
effective delivery of instruction.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of Area 3 elementary<br />
school campuses rated<br />
Academically Acceptable or better<br />
Percent of Area 3 middle school<br />
campuses rated Academically<br />
Acceptable or better<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
N/A 100% 100%<br />
Percent of Area 2 K-2 students<br />
Effectiveness<br />
reading on or above grade level on<br />
district reading assessment<br />
71% 85% 90%<br />
(DRA)<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Office of Schools -<br />
Area 3*<br />
N/A N/A N/A<br />
* Office did not exist at time of 2012 survey. Will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
N/A<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 318
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Accountability and Assessment<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Performance Officer<br />
The Office of Accountability and Assessment is responsible for all aspects of state data reporting compliance (PEIMS) as well<br />
as the administration of the district formative assessment program. The Office oversees the production, collection and<br />
maintenance of the related data elements and provides timely and accurate data products to campuses, district leadership<br />
and the state.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 650,941 $ 827,175 $ 825,347<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 62,527 $ 56,617 $ 55,117<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 6,235 $ 10,979 $ 10,979<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 3,799 $ 6,000 $ 2,359<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
725,647<br />
55,117<br />
10,979<br />
2,359<br />
-<br />
Total $ 723,502 $ 900,771 $ 893,802<br />
$<br />
794,102<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 10.00 9.00 10.00 10.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Administer 415 district-level short cycle, benchmark and modified assessments per year.<br />
* Prepare and submit 8 PEIMS submissions to TEA per year.<br />
* Prepare and submit 36 PET submissions to TEA per year.<br />
Extract, analyze and interpret campus level student data including demographic, enrollment, graduation, dropout,<br />
*<br />
assessment, attendance, academic achievement, etc. Develop and distribute related reports.<br />
* Provide leadership in the implementation and development of district data systems.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of state reporting<br />
deadlines met<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of ad hoc data requests<br />
fulfilled by deadline<br />
100% 98% - 100% 98% - 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of formative assessment<br />
deadlines met<br />
90% 93% 95%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Number of PEIMS data entry and<br />
assessment scanning errors<br />
4211 3579 3042<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent of benchmark and short<br />
cycle assessments that are<br />
administered online<br />
1.38% 1.52% 1.67%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Accountability and Assessment 96% 98% 98%<br />
97%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 319
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Campus/District Accountability<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Performance Officer<br />
Provide campus and district leaders with student performance data to gauge progress, inform good decision making, and<br />
target assistance for students, teachers and schools. Oversee and support district advisory bodies. Develop tools and<br />
procedures to monitor the implementation of the Strategic Plan.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 236,050 $ 212,340 $ 253,858 $ 254,096<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 123,104 $ 118,500 $ 118,000 $ 120,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 8,853 $ 26,979 $ 29,557 $ 33,557<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 312 $ 6,079 $ 1,014 $ 6,000<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 368,319 $ 363,898 $ 402,429<br />
$<br />
413,653<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.00 4.00 6.00 6.00<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Communicate with campus & district staff regarding state and federal accountability rules and requirements.<br />
Develop and maintain district's Strategic Plan.<br />
Provide an array of presentations and reports on campus and district performance measures and respond to ad hoc data<br />
requests.<br />
Provide oversight and support of district advisory bodies.<br />
Provide district wide support in the development of departmental plans, missions, goals and KPIs.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of all state and federal<br />
statutory and regulatory<br />
accountability deadlines met<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of data presentation<br />
deadlines met<br />
Percent of district advisory<br />
bodies with complete bylaws,<br />
charters, and websites<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Campus & District<br />
Accountability<br />
100% 99% 100%<br />
99%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 320
Research and Evaluation<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Performance Officer<br />
Support positive outcomes for <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> students by providing user-friendly information that is relevant, timely, and concise<br />
that district staff and stakeholders at every level use to make critical programmatic decisions.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 647,099 $ 728,166 $ 709,579<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 60,622 $ 35,240 $ 35,240<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 39,484 $ 58,731 $ 58,731<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 12,199 $ 13,007 $ 3,616<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 759,405 $ 835,144 $ 807,166<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
802,129<br />
35,240<br />
112,181<br />
3,616<br />
-<br />
953,166<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 7.45 6.35 4.45 5.95<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide formative feedback to program staff.<br />
* Support compliance reporting for grant funded programs.<br />
* Design, develop and deliver summative reports on program effectiveness.<br />
* Conduct districtwide surveys of students, parents, and staff.<br />
* Coordinate of District External Research Process.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of evaluation publication<br />
deadlines met<br />
Percent of compliance reporting<br />
deadlines met<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
80% 82% 90%<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Research and Evaluation 98% 97% 95%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 321
System Wide Testing<br />
Reports to: Chief Performance Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
System Wide Testing will work closely with campus personnel to provide training and support for student academic<br />
performance measurement and placement with a primary goal of ensuring integrity in the administration of all system-wide<br />
testing programs while complying with both state and federal regulations and guidelines.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 670,817 $ 690,896 $ 691,450<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 20,679 $ 39,750 $ 39,750<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 129,500 $ 133,095 $ 126,995<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 2,340 $ 4,993 $ 3,170<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 823,336 $ 868,734 $ 861,365<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
996,589<br />
39,750<br />
126,995<br />
3,170<br />
-<br />
1,166,504<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00<br />
Extra duty pay increase for end of course testing and TAKS testing<br />
Key Services<br />
* Provide technical assistance to district staff on system-wide testing issues.<br />
* Ensure state-mandated assessment program is implemented appropriately within <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
* Support the entire Accountability Department with other testing efforts as needed.<br />
* Ensure federal assessment programs like NAEP are implemented appropriately within <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
* Support other testing efforts within the district and provide technical assistance on a variety of testing issues.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of Campus Testing<br />
Coordinators (CTC) trained 100% 100% 100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Ratio of test administrators to<br />
students<br />
30:1 30:1 30:1<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Systemwide Testing 99% 99% 98%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 322
Human Resources<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Human Capital Officer<br />
In partnership with District schools and offices, the Office of Human Resources exists to recruit, support, and retain a talented,<br />
high quality, and diverse workforce.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,026,839 $ 4,197,320 $ 4,188,390<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 235,255 $ 436,272 $ 383,832<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 167,217 $ 148,979 $ 148,979<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 101,086 $ 222,201 $ 174,383<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 4,530,397 $ 5,004,772 $ 4,895,584<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
4,192,132<br />
383,832<br />
148,979<br />
215,411<br />
-<br />
4,940,354<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 43.50 42.50 40.50 40.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Recruit and staff all positions - professional, administrative, and classified.<br />
* Develop, implement, and monitor the District's compensation program.<br />
* Develop, implement, and monitor the District's leave policy.<br />
* Oversee all employee relations functions.<br />
* Oversee the evaluation process for all employees.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Number of teaching vacancies on<br />
the first day of school<br />
Percent of principal positions<br />
staffed by the beginning of the<br />
school year<br />
Percent of grievances resolved<br />
prior to reaching Level IV<br />
Rank as a top paying district in<br />
Central Texas (FICA excluded)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
6 0-5 0-5<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
97% 95%-97% 95%-98%<br />
7 of 10 5 of 10 3 of 10<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Human Resource Staffing 96% 93% 97%<br />
93%<br />
Human Resource Services 96% 93% 97%<br />
95%<br />
Employee Relations 99% 97% 99%<br />
99%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 323
Management Info System<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Human Capital Officer<br />
The Office of Technology is committed to a new digital learning environment that embraces 21st Century learning standards,<br />
assessment and accountability to positively transform learning and teaching for all students and teachers at A<strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 4,509,906 $ 4,610,742 $ 4,724,421<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 481,405 $ 618,490 $ 504,800<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 1,699,116 $ 1,299,548 $ 1,466,200<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 44,283 $ 90,775 $ 10,140<br />
Equipment (6600) $ 28,571 $ 10,000 $ 25,000<br />
Total $ 6,763,281 $ 6,629,555 $ 6,730,561<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
4,728,294<br />
504,800<br />
1,466,200<br />
10,140<br />
25,000<br />
6,734,434<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 56.00 56.00 55.00 55.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* System Integration and Data Warehouse<br />
* Student Information System, Financial Systems, HR Systems<br />
* System Development, Web and Portal Development<br />
* Security Management, Identity Mgmt, Access, Network, Servers, Wireless, Storage, Internet<br />
* Filtering, Intrusion Detection, Antivirus, Business Continuity, Backup & Disaster Recovery<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of service requests<br />
resolved within the service level<br />
agreement (IFAS)<br />
Percent of service requests<br />
resolved within the service level<br />
agreement (TEAMS)<br />
System Availability: Wireless<br />
System Availability: Network<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
68% 85% 90%<br />
89% 85% 90%<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Business Systems 93% 90% 96%<br />
89%<br />
Student Information Systems 99% 95% 98%<br />
95%<br />
MIS 99% 97% 100%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 324
Information System Admin<br />
Reports to: Chief Human Capital Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The Office of Technology is committed to a new digital learning environment that embraces 21st Century learning standards,<br />
assessment and accountability to positively transform learning and teaching for all students and teachers at A<strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 888,376 $ 853,982 $ 857,820<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 194,158 $ 89,901 $ 89,901<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 322,837 $ 375,426 $ 225,426<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 12,105 $ 13,185 $ 4,534<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,417,476 $ 1,332,494 $ 1,177,681<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
858,661<br />
89,901<br />
225,426<br />
4,534<br />
-<br />
1,178,522<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 13.00 13.00 15.00 15.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Technology Leadership, Strategy, Planning, Bond Project Management<br />
* Standards and Compliance, Licensing & Audits , Purchasing and Product Acquisition Standards<br />
* Software and Hardware Standards, Software and Hardware Inventory Management<br />
* Teacher Laptops, Regulatory Compliance<br />
* Datashare Agreements & Contracts, Help Desk<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of service requests<br />
resolved within the service level<br />
agreement (Help Desk)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
96% 85% 90%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Help Desk 98% 95% 98%<br />
96%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 325
Technology Customer Support<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Human Capital Officer<br />
The Office of Technology is committed to a new digital learning environment that embraces 21st Century learning standards,<br />
assessment and accountability to positively transform learning and teaching for all students and teachers at A<strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 3,631,323 $ 3,635,161 $ 4,131,865 $ 3,938,437<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 3,043,432 $ 2,991,360 $ 2,922,865<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 1,542,627 $ 1,318,956 $ 1,537,451<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 20,310 $ 27,000 $ 9,126<br />
Equipment (6600) $ 231,037 $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
2,922,865<br />
1,537,451<br />
9,126<br />
-<br />
Total $ 8,468,728 $ 7,972,477 $ 8,601,307<br />
$<br />
8,407,879<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 47.00 49.00 62.00 62.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Help Desk & Enterprise SLA’s<br />
* User Security Management, E-mail System, Web Content Support<br />
* Telecommunications, Desktop Support and management, Desktop Engineering<br />
* Instructional and Campus Support, Customer Communications<br />
* Systems Training and Professional Development<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of service requests<br />
resolved within the service level<br />
agreement (Desktop Support)<br />
Percent of service requests<br />
resolved within the service level<br />
agreement (Telecom)<br />
Percent of service requests<br />
resolved within the service level<br />
agreement (Servers)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
70% 85% 90%<br />
65% 85% 90%<br />
93% 85% 90%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Desktop Support 99% 94% 99%<br />
98%<br />
Desktop Engineering 99% 97% 99%<br />
99%<br />
Enterprise Services 99% 96% 98%<br />
98%<br />
Telecommunications 98% 95% 98%<br />
97%<br />
WAN 95% 96% 99%<br />
98%<br />
Servers 98% 96% 98%<br />
99%<br />
Network Security 98% 96% 100%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 326
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Educator Quality<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Human Capital Officer<br />
The Office of Educator Quality positively impacts and supports the recruitment, development, retention, and placement of<br />
effective teachers and administrators throughout <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 185,829 $ 2,614,470 $ 2,571,193<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 617 $ 182,600 $ 121,499<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 2,208 $ 286,738 $ 199,453<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 1,298 $ 257,037 $ 124,918<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
2,465,158<br />
173,945<br />
230,425<br />
120,584<br />
-<br />
Total $ 189,952 $ 3,340,845 $ 3,017,063<br />
$<br />
2,990,112<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 2.00 21.50 19.50 19.50<br />
Key Services<br />
* Induction of novice teachers and administrators.<br />
* Provide ongoing professional development opportunities for A<strong>ISD</strong> staff.<br />
* Provide targeted supports and rewards through strategic compensation (REACH) program.<br />
* Provide leadership pathways and training for teacher leaders and aspiring administrators.<br />
* Support a comprehensive approach to cultural proficiency and inclusiveness.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of newly hired<br />
teachers and administrators<br />
who participate in the district<br />
onboarding process within 1<br />
month of hiring date<br />
Percent of teachers and<br />
administrators with a<br />
professional learning plan<br />
Teacher retention rate (East<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Schools)<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
90% 92% 94%<br />
0% 0% 25%<br />
71.7% 78% 85%<br />
Percent of district administrator<br />
vacancies filled with internal<br />
candidates 90% 92% 95%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Professional Development 93% 88% 84%<br />
83%<br />
Leadership Development 96% 94% 85%<br />
86%<br />
Strategic<br />
Compensation/REACH<br />
98% 95% 87%<br />
92%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 327
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Transportation Office<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Operations Officer<br />
The mission of A<strong>ISD</strong> Transportation is to provide safe, reliable and professional service for our students according to the<br />
parameters set forth by the District's policy, and in adherence to applicable State and Federal laws.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 22,421,856 $ 21,298,073 $ 20,874,147<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 258,328 $ 209,150 $ 206,583<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 2,701,858 $ 2,920,500 $ 3,178,417<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ (973,642) $ (761,000) $ (848,980)<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$ 22,147,632<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
210,991<br />
4,117,600<br />
(883,480)<br />
-<br />
Total $ 24,408,401 $ 23,666,723 $ 23,410,167<br />
$<br />
25,592,743<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 696.00 689.00 687.00 712.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* A<strong>ISD</strong> Transportation transports 22,000 students daily on 512 buses, traveling 7.2 million miles a year.<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
Services include regular, special education, cross town busing, pre-k centers, after school, tutorials, NCLB and bilingual<br />
routes.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Transportation provides about 8,000 field trips and athletic trips per year.<br />
80% of the Buses are equipped with a GPS and digital camera system for additional safety and efficiency.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is the proud owner of the first plug in hybrid bus in Texas and piloting 6 propane buses. The average age of the fleet<br />
is 5.4 years.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Efficiency Percent of on-time arrivals 98% 96-97% 96-98%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent of driver staff current on<br />
all training, screening, and<br />
required certifications<br />
Average number of buses used<br />
per 100 students<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
0.56 0.57 0.57<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Transportation 95% 95% 99%<br />
94%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 328
Financial Services<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
It is the goal of the Finance Department to provide the highest quality financial information and services in an accurate, friendly<br />
and timely manner, to safeguard the finances of A<strong>ISD</strong> in such a manner as to help enhance the education of our students.<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 2,593,062 $ 2,639,905 $ 2,662,979<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 321,522 $ 349,358 $ 342,878<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 46,263 $ 41,050 $ 41,050<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 1,608,302 $ 1,773,934 $ 1,678,904<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
2,679,804<br />
342,497<br />
41,050<br />
1,666,285<br />
-<br />
Total $ 4,569,149 $ 4,804,247 $ 4,725,811<br />
$<br />
4,729,636<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 46.50 45.00 47.00 46.50<br />
Key Services<br />
* Pay all district employees and vendors accurately and timely.<br />
* Administer all employee benefit programs and treasury investment functions.<br />
* Monitor and maintain the district's general ledger.<br />
* Prepare financial monitoring reports for local, state and federal entities as well as the public.<br />
* Provide financial analysis on demand for district administrators and public information requests.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Efficiency<br />
Number of days to process a<br />
vendor payment<br />
24 27 25<br />
Efficiency<br />
Payroll staff to employee ratio<br />
0.07 0.08 0.08<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent of grant reports filed by<br />
deadline<br />
98% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Department of Financial<br />
Services<br />
90% 91% 98%<br />
96%<br />
Payroll 94% 94% 98%<br />
93%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 329
General Fund Expenditures<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Services<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Services develops, monitors, and reports the district’s annual fiscal budget to employees, parents, and the <strong>Austin</strong><br />
community. <strong>Budget</strong> Services analyzes and compiles data based on legislative decisions, district administrator feedback,<br />
mathematical trends, and relevant assumptions in an accurate, timely, transparent, and fiscally responsible manner.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 389,103 $ 465,816 $ 459,947 $ 460,491<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 14,217 $ 12,192 $ 16,192 $ 16,192<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 11,249 $ 3,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 3,010 $ 3,588 $ 2,490 $ 2,490<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 417,579 $ 484,596 $ 482,629<br />
$<br />
483,173<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00<br />
Key Services<br />
*<br />
Prepare and complete the budget cycle based on pre-established Board of Trustees and TEA legally mandated timelines.<br />
Prepare, monitor, and provide monthly comparative budget to actual reports to those accountable for expenditure line<br />
*<br />
items.<br />
Create greater financial transparency through community meetings, following established GFOA and ASBO budget<br />
*<br />
reporting guidelines, and ensuring budget information is accessible to employees, parents, and the community.<br />
* Maintain and amend the budget throughout the year as revenue, student populations, and expenditures shift.<br />
* Provide financial analysis on demand for district administrators and public information requests.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent final amended budget GF<br />
61XX in line with Actual GF 61XX<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
90% 92% 95%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Percent final amended budget in<br />
line with actual revenues for fiscal<br />
year end<br />
Percent final amended budget<br />
that is in line with actual<br />
expenditures for fiscal year end<br />
95% 96% 96%<br />
95% 96% 96%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Services 99% 98% 100%<br />
98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 330
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Contract & Procurement Services<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
Contract & Procurement Services exists to support schools, academic departments, and administrative departments to<br />
provide a comprehensive educational experience by establishing strategic partnerships and administering district-wide<br />
contracts and purchase orders for equipment, supplies, and services.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 885,740 $ 925,781 $ 849,664 $ 850,746<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 108,584 $ 13,800 $ 22,800 $ 22,300<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 20,711 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 8,500<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 18,997 $ 11,600 $ 9,859 $ 12,859<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,034,032 $ 962,181 $ 893,323 $ 894,405<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 14.00 15.00 15.00 15.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Acquire and maintain an adequate inventory of instructional materials (textbooks) and ancillary supplies.<br />
* Develop and administer contracts for services and master purchase agreements.<br />
* Conduct competitive bidding and establish strategic source agreements for equipment, supplies, & services.<br />
* Maintain an effective Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) community support program.<br />
* Administer a corporate purchasing card expenditure management program.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of purchase dollars above<br />
the single quote limit that were<br />
competitively bid<br />
Average major procurement<br />
administrative lead time (PALT)<br />
(in days)<br />
Average requisition processing<br />
lead time (in days)<br />
Procurement savings/ cost<br />
avoidance<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
97% > 95% > 95%<br />
84 75 60<br />
3.05 3 3<br />
1.6% 3% 3%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Purchasing 93% 87% 97%<br />
92%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 331
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Mail Room<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Mail Services provides intra-district mail and package delivery services to all district facilities; receives and delivers U.S. Postal<br />
Service, Federal Express, and United Parcel Service mail and packages at the Carruth Administration Center; and<br />
consolidates outgoing U.S. Mail.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 172,145 $ 136,530 $ 141,530 $ 151,805<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 4,491 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 150,045 $ 160,000 $ 150,000 $ 140,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 326,682 $ 300,530 $ 295,530 $ 295,805<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE<br />
4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Central receiving of U.S. Mail, FedEx, and UPS packages at the Carruth Administration Center (CAC).<br />
* Prepare and meter (stamp) outgoing U.S. Mail.<br />
* Deliver intra-district mail and packages to schools, administrative facilities, and support facilities.<br />
* Deliver Board Weekly Update and other materials to Board members.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Number of complaints received<br />
4
Medicaid<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
The Medicaid Student Billing Department exists to bill for Special Education Students who are Medicaid Eligible and receive<br />
School Health and Related Services (SHARS) from A<strong>ISD</strong> Special Education Employees or contracted staff. Our goal is to<br />
generate revenue dollars to continue to support A<strong>ISD</strong> budgetary needs.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 236,788 $ 232,222 $ 232,722<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 357,624 $ 56,725 $ 55,000<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 10,528 $ 3,300 $ 3,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 5,968 $ 10,303 $ 6,359<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 610,908 $ 302,550 $ 297,081<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
232,722<br />
55,500<br />
3,000<br />
10,600<br />
-<br />
301,822<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Develop a list of A<strong>ISD</strong> Special Education Employees and contracted staff who deliver SHARS Services.<br />
* File Quarterly Medicaid Administrative Claim (MAC) Report and SHARS Annual Cost Reconciliation.<br />
* Obtain Parental Consents for Medicaid Eligible Student prior to billing SHARS.<br />
Bill for Assessment of Special Education Students, Audiological Needs, Nursing Services, Personal Care Services,<br />
*<br />
Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, Speech Therapy, and Special Transportation.<br />
* Educate and train A<strong>ISD</strong> Special Education Staff to complete ARD documentation and billing of SHARS.<br />
Type<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Percent of front end federal<br />
funding expenditures supporting<br />
the A<strong>ISD</strong> positions in the Random<br />
Moment Time Study (RMTS) and<br />
School Health and Related<br />
Services (SHARS) Cost Pool<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
13% 13% 10%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Number of sessions for all<br />
School Health and Related<br />
Services (SHARS) billed in the<br />
fiscal year.<br />
267,860 239,000 249,000<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Number of schools visited by a<br />
Medicaid training specialist<br />
44 66 99<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 333
Insurance / Risk Management<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
The Risk Management Department maintains and provides insurance coverage to all district employees who sustain an illness<br />
or injury which arises out of and in the course and scope of their employment. Immediately following the occurrence of a work<br />
related injury or illness, Risk Management is the point of contact for staff members to obtain forms, file a claim or receive<br />
answers to questions. Risk Management will file the claim and establish the official relationship between the<br />
employee/claimant and the insurance company.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 134,125 $ 133,609 $ 136,436<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 161,145 $ 176,426 $ 205,500<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 6,658 $ 6,586 $ 6,500<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 2,292,785 $ 2,289,893 $ 2,176,000<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 2,594,713 $ 2,606,514 $ 2,524,436<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
136,436<br />
200,000<br />
8,500<br />
2,676,000<br />
-<br />
3,020,936<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Procure and maintain Workers' Compensation insurance coverage and services for all district employees.<br />
* Ensure the essential forms and instructions for claim filing are available to all employees.<br />
* File WC claims and provide claimant access to the insurance company.<br />
* Answer employee questions and assist with concerns in a timely manner.<br />
* Remain professional and customer friendly at all times.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Annual percentage of worker's<br />
compensation claims<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
3.94% 3.62% 3.60%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Average cost per incurred<br />
workers' compensation claim<br />
$3,485 $3,650 $3,600<br />
Efficiency<br />
Average number of approved<br />
workers' compensation claims per<br />
month<br />
47.6 48.1 48<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Employee Benefits 99% 96% 99%<br />
99%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 334
Printshop<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Print Services exists to support schools, academic departments, and administrative departments to provide a comprehensive<br />
educational experience by printing quality documents, forms, and materials.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 183,112 $ 199,443 $ 194,037<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 29,928 $ 35,250 $ 42,150<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 71,744 $ 68,381 $ 60,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ 1,077 $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 284,784 $ 304,150 $ 296,187<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
194,596<br />
75,404<br />
60,000<br />
-<br />
-<br />
330,000<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00<br />
Key Services<br />
* Print documents and materials on demand with high quality at the lowest cost.<br />
* Print forms for student enrollment, school administration, special education, health & safety, etc.<br />
* Maintain an on-line library of documents that teachers can request to be printed and delivered to their school.<br />
* Provide document binding services.<br />
* Reproduce (copy) documents and materials.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Efficiency<br />
Number of jobs received<br />
Annual percent increase in<br />
revenue received from Printshop<br />
751 788 825<br />
10% 5% 10%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Print Shop* N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 335
State & Federal Compliance & Accountability<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
Mission Statement<br />
The mission of the Department of State and Federal Accountability is to ensure compliance for all competitive grants,<br />
donations and foundation funds, federal and state entitlement grants, including all NCLB regulations, monitor all expenditures<br />
and reporting of those grants, and review and process all grant requests of departments, campuses, and other entities.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 276,241 $ 365,716 $ 300,496<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 179 $ 1,330 $ 1,330<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 4,880 $ 3,800 $ 3,800<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ 1,017 $ 829 $ 229<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 282,317 $ 371,675 $ 305,855<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
300,754<br />
1,330<br />
6,800<br />
2,229<br />
311,113<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 4.25 4.75 4.75 4.75<br />
Key Services<br />
* Ensure consistent oversight and management of all external funding.<br />
* Increase capacity of district to effectively manage and implement externally funded initiatives.<br />
*<br />
Maintain compliance for all state, federal rules and regulations, as well as, compliance for are activities required under<br />
externally funded initiatives.<br />
Type<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of Title I, Title II, and Title<br />
III campus and department<br />
quarterly reports on expenditures<br />
of fund balances completed<br />
100% 98%-100% 99%-100%<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Percent of NCLB consolidated<br />
application campus and<br />
department grantee key contacts<br />
that have received at least 5<br />
visits/contacts per year<br />
100% 100% 100%<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff<br />
respond in a<br />
timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
State & Federal Accountability 92% 87% 96%<br />
92%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 336
Central Warehouse<br />
Mission Statement<br />
Reports to: Chief Financial Officer<br />
Warehouse Services provides instructional materials (textbooks), classroom supplies, and classroom furniture to students and<br />
teachers; provides food products and supplies to support food service operations; provides office and custodial supplies to<br />
support school operations; provides archived records storage; provides moving services; collects and sells surplus property;<br />
and performs a variety of supportive services as requested.<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
General Fund Expenditures<br />
Salary & Benefits (6100) $ 897,123 $ 945,369 $ 589,161<br />
Contracted Services (6200) $ 126,933 $ 137,786 $ 126,776<br />
Supplies & Materials (6300) $ 318,840 $ 117,000 $ 117,000<br />
Other Expenses (6400) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Equipment (6600) $ - $ - $ -<br />
Total $ 1,342,896 $ 1,200,155 $ 832,937<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
$<br />
648,494<br />
137,489<br />
116,000<br />
1,000<br />
-<br />
902,983<br />
General Fund Staffing FTE 20.50 19.50 11.50 11.50<br />
Key Services<br />
* Central receiving/ storage of frozen/ refrigerated food products, dry food products, and cafeteria supplies.<br />
* Central receiving, depository, and distribution of instructional materials (textbooks, consumable supplies).<br />
* Delivery of frozen/ refrigerated food products, dry food products, cafeteria supplies, classroom supplies, paper.<br />
* Central receiving/ storage of instructional supplies, custodial supplies, classroom furniture, and related items.<br />
* Other services- textbook audits, moving services, surplus property, archived records storage, and more.<br />
Type<br />
Efficiency<br />
Effectiveness<br />
Key Performance Indicator<br />
Stock turn ratio<br />
Warehouse stock item fill rate<br />
Baseline<br />
Targets<br />
FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014<br />
3.5 3.5 4<br />
94% 98% 98%<br />
Efficiency<br />
Number of stock keeping units<br />
(SKU)<br />
1,824 1,800 1,500<br />
Customer Service Survey 2012 - Percent responding "Agree" or "Strongly Agree"<br />
Staff are<br />
courteous<br />
Staff respond<br />
in a timely<br />
manner<br />
Department<br />
provides<br />
valuable<br />
services<br />
Staff are knowledgeable, wellinformed,<br />
and expert in their<br />
area<br />
Central Warehouse* N/A N/A N/A<br />
* will be included in the 2013 Customer Service Survey<br />
N/A<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 337
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
Detailed Non‐<br />
General Fund<br />
Financial<br />
Information
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Food Service Funds<br />
Purpose of the Food Service Fund<br />
The Food Service Fund accounts for the<br />
operation of the district’s cafeteria meal<br />
program. The Food Service program includes a<br />
Food Service Fund expenditure budget of<br />
$40.1 million and a Food Service Summer<br />
Program budget of $682,914 for a total of $40.8<br />
million.<br />
Revenue<br />
Revenue to support the Food Service program<br />
is generated from local, state and federal<br />
sources. Local sources account for $8.4 million<br />
or 20.9 percent of the total revenue for Food<br />
Services. Local sources include earnings from<br />
investments and fees collected from sales of<br />
meals to students and staff for breakfast and<br />
lunch.<br />
State sources account for $1.1 million or 2.9<br />
percent of the total revenue for Food Services.<br />
They include direct financial assistance<br />
payments from the TEA.<br />
Federal sources account for $30.7 million or<br />
76.2 percent of the total revenue for Food<br />
Services. The National School Lunch Program<br />
generates $22.3 million or 72.6 percent of the<br />
federal sources. This program is administered<br />
by the Texas Department of Agriculture which<br />
passes monies through the TEA to support the<br />
school district’s breakfast and lunch programs.<br />
The Food Service Summer program receives<br />
funding from the Department of Human<br />
Services, based on the average number of daily<br />
participants. This program has a budget of<br />
$682,914 for both revenue and expenditure<br />
budgets.<br />
Expenditures<br />
For the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year, the Food Service<br />
expenditure budget of $40.8 million exceeds<br />
the Food Service revenue budget of $40.2<br />
million by an amount of $582,456. The balance<br />
of the shortfall will be supported from the Food<br />
Service reserve funds which will have an<br />
ending fund balance of approximately $8.2<br />
million.<br />
Outlook for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Breakfast prices for <strong>FY2013</strong> will remain<br />
constant from the prior four years. Lunch prices<br />
for <strong>FY2013</strong> were increased slightly from $2.15<br />
to $2.25 for elementary lunch and from $2.30<br />
to $2.40 for secondary lunch. A<strong>ISD</strong> is aware<br />
the economic downturn still impacts many<br />
families in <strong>Austin</strong> and strives to keep meal<br />
prices affordable while also maintaining a<br />
balanced Food Services budget.<br />
Comparison to Prior Year<br />
Total Food Services revenue will increase by<br />
$1 million from the prior year. Local sources of<br />
revenue are expected to increase by $166,179<br />
or 2 percent and the state budgeted funding<br />
levels will remain the same. Federal revenue<br />
will increase approximately $844,751 million or<br />
2.8 percent from the <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted <strong>Budget</strong>.<br />
To commensurate with revenue, expenditures<br />
will increase $947,514 or 2.4 percent from the<br />
prior year adopted budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 338
Table 67<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Food Service Funds<br />
Statement of Revenue and Expenditures for <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2009<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
School Lunches $ 8,052,659 $ 7,771,378 $ 7,602,803 $ 8,148,083 $ 8,314,262<br />
Earnings from Investments 62,822 14,537 11,024 14,537 14,537<br />
Other 32,094 42,041 10,610 63,916 63,916<br />
TOTAL 8,147,575 7,827,956 7,624,437 8,226,536 8,392,715<br />
STATE REVENUE SOURCES<br />
State Program Revenue 243,818 251,031 239,679 247,313 247,313<br />
TRS on Behalf Payment 907,474 812,641 886,245 899,014 899,014<br />
TOTAL 1,151,292 1,063,672 1,125,924 1,146,327 1,146,327<br />
FEDERAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
School Breakfast Program 5,336,244 5,713,018 6,021,016 5,916,389 6,093,881<br />
National School Lunch Program 19,507,701 21,029,117 21,607,379 21,628,537 22,277,393<br />
USDA Donated Commodities 1,164,566 1,226,842 1,211,676 1,226,842 1,245,245<br />
After School Snack Program 389,982 369,913 245,275 389,982 389,982<br />
Other Federal Revenues 669,277 - 525,040 669,277 669,277<br />
TOTAL 27,067,770 28,338,890 29,610,386 29,831,027 30,675,778<br />
TOTAL REVENUE<br />
36,366,638 37,230,518 38,360,747 39,203,890 40,214,820<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
Payroll Costs 20,908,710 21,495,300 22,656,907 23,048,398 23,579,101<br />
Professional & Contracted Srvcs. 588,127 530,923 626,808 1,532,080 1,532,080<br />
Supplies & Materials 13,663,689 13,954,648 14,658,406 15,185,107 15,601,918<br />
Other Operating Expenses 9,580 9,914 12,708 21,566 21,566<br />
Capital Outlay 460,349 351,649 550,892 62,611 62,611<br />
TOTAL 35,630,455 36,342,434 38,505,721 39,849,762 40,797,276<br />
NET REVENUE OVER (UNDER) 736,183 888,084 (144,974) (645,872) (582,456)<br />
OTHER SOURCES/USES<br />
Other Resources - - - -<br />
Other Uses - - - -<br />
TOTAL - - - - -<br />
NET REVENUE SOURCES OVER (UNDER) 736,183 888,084 (144,974) (645,872) (582,456)<br />
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 7,926,595 8,662,778 9,550,862 9,405,888 8,760,016<br />
ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 8,662,778 $ 9,550,862 $ 9,405,888 $ 8,760,016 $ 8,177,560<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Expenditures<br />
24% 26% 24% 22% 20%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 339
Table 68<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Food Service Funds<br />
School Breakfast and Lunch Program<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011<br />
Number of free lunches served 6,630,431 6,961,968 7,197,365<br />
Number of reduce priced lunches served 798,387 701,948 554,829<br />
Number of full price lunches served 1,727,434 1,674,505 1,661,788<br />
Number of A la Carte meal equivalents 1,407,146 1,368,566 1,290,902<br />
Total number of lunches served 10,563,398 10,706,987 10,704,884<br />
Average daily free lunches served 37,888 39,783 41,128<br />
Average daily reduced price lunches served 4,562 4,011 3,170<br />
Average daily full price lunches served 9,871 9,569 9,496<br />
Total average daily lunches served 60,362 61,183 61,171<br />
Number of free breakfasts served 2,980,023 3,116,045 3,276,842<br />
Number of reduce priced breakfasts served 237,324 202,274 165,092<br />
Number of full price breakfasts served 201,648 195,167 206,236<br />
Number of A la Carte meal equivalents 242,153 235,514 222,149<br />
Total number of breakfasts served 3,661,148 3,749,000 3,870,319<br />
Average daily free breakfasts served 17,029 17,806 18,725<br />
Average daily reduced price breakfasts served 1,356 1,156 943<br />
Average daily full price breakfasts served 1,152 1,115 1,178<br />
Total average daily breakfasts served 20,921 21,423 22,116<br />
Number of days breakfast & lunch served 175 175 175<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 340
Debt Service Fund<br />
The Debt Service Fund accounts for all bonded debt payments, including principal, interest and fees.<br />
Major sources of revenues are from local property taxes levied for bonded debt payment purposes.<br />
Interest earnings contribute a relatively minor source of additional revenue for this fund. As of the<br />
beginning of <strong>FY2013</strong>, excluding commercial paper, the district projects an outstanding debt balance of<br />
$749.6 million. The district is currently planning to convert $100 million in commercial paper to long term<br />
fixed debt in January 2013.<br />
The total revenues and other resources for the Debt Service Fund for <strong>FY2013</strong> are $102.3 million and total<br />
expenditures and other uses are $102.7 million. Debt Service revenues are projected to increase<br />
approximately $6.9 million from the prior year. The district is anticipating an increase of $5.8 million in<br />
current year property tax revenues as a result of higher appraised property values and an increased<br />
collection rate. A<strong>ISD</strong> will spend an additional $14.62 million on bond interest, but $7.8 million less in bond<br />
principal when compared to the prior year. The budget for the <strong>FY2013</strong> Debt Service Fund will have a<br />
deficit of $462,627. A minimum fund balance of $10 million must be maintained in the Debt Service Funds<br />
to cover required investments associated with the district’s Qualified Zone Academy Bonds (QZAB)<br />
program. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the I&S tax rate of 0.163 per $100 of assessed property value will remain<br />
unchanged from FY2012. By law, the district must set its tax rate at a level that will generate enough<br />
revenue to cover the debt obligations that are authorized by the voters. Debt service revenues are<br />
expected to increase $6.9 million, or 7.3 percent and expenditures are expected to increase by $6.8<br />
million or 7.1 percent as compared to the prior year.<br />
The district has fixed rate bonds for various bond issues - some have call dates, others are non-callable<br />
bonds. The structure of the bonds are set to compliment the overall structure of the debt service fund to<br />
keep the Interest and Sinking Fund tax rate as constant as possible. Equipment purchases are amortized<br />
on a shorter basis to match the useful life.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 341
Table 69<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Audited<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
$ Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
LOCAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Earnings from Investments $ 284,511 $ 307,657 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - 0.0%<br />
Penalty & Interest 377,582 412,842 330,000 400,000 70,000 21.2%<br />
Taxes- Prior Years 372,885 486,876 325,000 425,000 100,000 30.8%<br />
Taxes-Current Year 74,389,079 87,334,669 94,505,938 100,272,021 5,766,083 6.1%<br />
Total Revenues from Local Sources 75,424,057 88,542,044 95,360,938 101,297,021 5,936,083 6.2%<br />
FEDERAL REVENUE SOURCES<br />
Building America Bond Subsidy - 886,020 - 984,466 984,466 -<br />
Total Revenues from Federal Sources - 886,020 - 984,466 984,466 -<br />
TOTAL REVENUE 75,424,057 89,428,064 95,360,938 102,281,487 6,920,549 7.3%<br />
EXPENDITURES<br />
Bond Principal 45,112,633 52,617,633 58,697,347 50,898,305 (7,799,042) -13.3%<br />
Bond Interest 34,671,258 35,122,926 36,148,032 50,770,809 14,622,777 40.5%<br />
Other Debt Serv Fees 418,768 893,547 1,075,000 1,075,000 - 0.0%<br />
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 80,202,659 88,634,106 95,920,379 102,744,114 6,823,735 7.1%<br />
NET REVENUE OVER (UNDER) (4,778,602) 793,958 (559,441) (462,627) 96,814 -17.3%<br />
OTHER SOURCES<br />
Premium/Discount on Bonds - - - - -<br />
Prepaid Interest - - - - -<br />
Sale of Bonds - - - - -<br />
Other Uses 112,393 - - - -<br />
TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 112,393 - - - - -<br />
NET REVENUE SOURCES OVER (UNDER) (4,666,209) 793,958 (559,441) (462,627) 96,814 -17.3%<br />
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 25,271,334 20,605,125 21,399,083 20,839,642 (559,441) -2.6%<br />
ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 20,605,125 $ 21,399,083 $ 20,839,642 $ 20,377,015 $ (462,627) -2.2%<br />
Ending Fund Balance as a % of Total <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Expenditures<br />
26% 24% 22% 20%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 342
Table 70<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Combined Debt Service Schedule<br />
Fiscal Year<br />
Ending 8/31 Principal Interest<br />
CP Interest<br />
and Debt<br />
Service Fund<br />
Fees<br />
Total<br />
2013 $ 47,898,306 $ 46,569,676 $ 1,375,000 $ 95,842,982<br />
2014 $ 49,203,777 $ 45,117,840 $ 1,375,000 $ 95,696,617<br />
2015 $ 63,887,347 $ 29,660,007 $ 1,375,000 $ 94,922,354<br />
2016 $ 66,932,347 $ 26,619,682 $ 1,375,000 $ 94,927,029<br />
2017 $ 43,072,347 $ 23,454,157 $ 1,375,000 $ 67,901,504<br />
2018 $ 34,339,300 $ 21,486,772 $ 1,375,000 $ 57,201,072<br />
2019 $ 25,479,300 $ 20,078,510 $ 1,375,000 $ 46,932,810<br />
2020 $ 24,094,300 $ 19,009,383 $ 1,375,000 $ 44,478,683<br />
2021 $ 24,764,838 $ 18,008,297 $ 1,375,000 $ 44,148,135<br />
2022 $ 25,367,633 $ 16,940,906 $ 1,375,000 $ 43,683,539<br />
2023 $ 26,402,633 $ 15,834,354 $ 1,375,000 $ 43,611,987<br />
2024 $ 27,552,633 $ 14,624,953 $ 1,375,000 $ 43,552,586<br />
2025 $ 27,855,000 $ 13,353,676 $ 1,375,000 $ 42,583,676<br />
2026 $ 28,850,000 $ 12,204,635 $ 1,375,000 $ 42,429,635<br />
2027 $ 30,175,000 $ 11,004,444 $ 1,375,000 $ 42,554,444<br />
2028 $ 31,525,000 $ 9,601,264 $ 1,375,000 $ 42,501,264<br />
2029 $ 32,945,000 $ 8,124,209 $ 1,375,000 $ 42,444,209<br />
2030 $ 34,445,000 $ 6,554,299 $ 1,375,000 $ 42,374,299<br />
2031 $ 29,525,000 $ 4,912,204 $ 1,375,000 $ 35,812,204<br />
2032 $ 20,995,000 $ 3,496,979 $ 1,375,000 $ 25,866,979<br />
2033 $ 21,955,000 $ 2,510,405 $ 1,375,000 $ 25,840,405<br />
2034 $ 16,055,000 $ 1,477,983 $ 1,375,000 $ 18,907,983<br />
2035 $ 10,170,000 $ 742,711 $ 1,375,000 $ 12,287,711<br />
2036 $ 6,080,000 $ 304,000 $ 1,375,000 $ 7,759,000<br />
$ 749,569,761 $ 371,691,349 $ 33,000,000 $ 1,154,261,110<br />
* The above schedule does not include annual debt service fees.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 343
Millions<br />
$120<br />
Table 71 41<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> District<br />
Outstanding Bonded Debts<br />
Combined Debt Service Timeline<br />
$100<br />
$80<br />
$60<br />
$40<br />
$20<br />
$-<br />
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036<br />
Interest Principal Total<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 344
Table 72<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Bonded Debt Facts and Legal Debt Margin<br />
Bonded Debt Facts<br />
Total Outstanding Debt (excludes Commercial Paper)<br />
Final Payment on Bonded Debt<br />
Ratio of Net Bonded Debt to Taxable Assessed Value<br />
Net Bonded Debt 8/31/2010 per Student<br />
Bond Rating<br />
Authorized but Unissued<br />
Borrowing Restrictions<br />
Taxes Due<br />
Penalties<br />
Rate and Levy Limitations<br />
$749,569,757<br />
$2,036<br />
$0<br />
$8,643<br />
Moodys: Aaa<br />
S & P: AA+<br />
Fitch: AA+<br />
$229,308,189<br />
Ten percent of Assessed Value<br />
October 1, delinquent after January 31<br />
Six percent plus 1% per month interest<br />
No limit for debt service tax rate<br />
Legal Debt Margin Calculation<br />
Assessed Value for 2012 $59,110,581,643<br />
Debt Limit at 10 Percent of Assessed Value 5,911,058,164<br />
Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit:<br />
Total Outstanding Bonded Debt $749,569,757<br />
Less: Net Assets in Debt Service (20,839,642)<br />
Total Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit 728,730,115<br />
Legal Debt Margin $6,639,788,279<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 345
Debt Service Policy- CCA (Legal)<br />
Bonds and Bond Taxes<br />
The Board may obtain funds to construct, acquire, or equip school buildings, to purchase necessary sites,<br />
to purchase new school buses, or to acquire or refinance property financed under a contract entered<br />
under the Public Property Finance Act by issuing bonds and assessing annual ad valorem taxes sufficient<br />
to pay the principal and interest on the bonds as they come due.<br />
Bond Issues on New Debt<br />
Before issuing bonds the district must demonstrate to the attorney general that, with respect to the<br />
proposed issuance, the district has a projected ability to pay the principal of and interest on the proposed<br />
bonds and all previously issued bonds, other than bonds authorized to be issued at an election held on or<br />
before April 1, 1991, and issued before September 1, 1992, from a tax at a rate not to exceed $ .50 per<br />
$100 of valuation.<br />
Elections<br />
No bonds shall be issued or taxes levied unless approved by a majority of the qualified voters of the<br />
district who vote at an election held for such purpose. The election shall be called by Board resolution,<br />
which shall set the date, polling places, and propositions to be voted on. The election shall be held on a<br />
uniform election date.<br />
Propositions<br />
Each proposition submitted to authorize the issuance of bonds shall include the question of whether the<br />
Board may levy an ad valorem tax either:<br />
1. Sufficient, without limits as to rate or amount, to pay the principal of and interest on said bonds; or<br />
2. Sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on said bonds; provided that the annual aggregate<br />
bond taxes in the district shall never exceed the rate stated in the proposition.<br />
Refunding Bonds Authority<br />
The Board is authorized to refund or refinance all or any part of any of its outstanding bonds and interest<br />
thereon, payable from ad valorem taxes, by issuing refunding bonds payable from ad valorem taxes in<br />
accordance with legal requirements for the issuance.<br />
Authorized Unissued Bonds<br />
If the district has authorized school bonds for a specific purpose and that purpose has been accomplished<br />
by other means or has been abandoned and all or a portion of the authorized bonds remains unissued,<br />
the Board may call an election to determine whether the authorized bonds may be issued or sold for a<br />
different purpose or purposes specified in the election order. If a majority of those voting at the election<br />
favor the sale of the unissued bonds, the Board is authorized to issue the bonds and use the proceeds for<br />
the purpose or purposes stated in the election order.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 346
Capital Projects<br />
Appropriations for the Capital Projects Fund are not incorporated into the official <strong>FY2013</strong> Adopted<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>. The Adopted <strong>Budget</strong> is reviewed and approved by the Board of Trustees, while the funding for<br />
capital projects is approved by <strong>Austin</strong> voters. However, the capital projects have a significant dollar value<br />
and are an integral part of the district’s operations.<br />
The Capital Projects Fund generally encompasses projects that are financed through the issuance of<br />
school building bonds, subject to approval by voters. Some examples of Capital Project Fund<br />
expenditures include:<br />
Purchase of sites for school buildings<br />
Acquisition, construction, renovation, rehabilitation and improvement of school buildings<br />
Purchase new school buses<br />
Equipping school buildings (furniture, fixtures, and equipment)<br />
The Apple at Work Bond Program<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> voters in September 2004 gave their overwhelming approval to a five-year, $519.5 million school<br />
bond program to alleviate overcrowding, keep up with <strong>Austin</strong>'s growth, and improve the quality, safety and<br />
sustainability of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>'s campuses and facilities. The vast majority of these capital projects have<br />
been completed.<br />
In May 2008, <strong>Austin</strong> voters approved a $343.7 million bond initiative for capital projects which will be<br />
implemented over a four year period. This voter approval enables the district to increase the Interest and<br />
Sinking (I&S) tax rate to a maximum of $0.170 per $100 assessed value. The 2011-12 I&S tax rate is<br />
currently $0.163 per $100 of assessed value.<br />
The district is contemplating the capital project needs for a new bond program, possibly in 2013.<br />
Table 73<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2008 Bond Initiative Capital Projects Pie Chart<br />
$82,000,000<br />
23.9%<br />
Special<br />
Programs and<br />
Expansion<br />
Health, Safety,<br />
Environment,<br />
Critical<br />
Renovations,<br />
and Other<br />
District Needs<br />
Relief for<br />
Overcrowding,<br />
Growth and<br />
Support for<br />
Academic<br />
Achievement<br />
$187,797,315<br />
54.6%<br />
$73,920,504<br />
21.5%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 347
Table 74<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2008 Bond Proposition Detail<br />
Proposition 1 – Relief for Overcrowding/Growth and Support for Academic<br />
Achievement<br />
1. Uphaus Elementary School Early Childhood Center $ 21,600,000<br />
2. Land acquisition for Linder Early Childhood Center $ 2,400,000<br />
3. Barrington Elementary School eight-classroom addition $ 4,313,318<br />
4. Hart Elementary School eight-classroom addition $ 4,442,242<br />
5. Langford Elementary School eight-classroom addition $ 4,367,607<br />
6. Undesignated elementary school $ 25,168,951<br />
7. Land acquisition for undesignated elementary school $ 2,574,880<br />
8. Auditorium replacement/renovation at Lanier and McCallum High Schools $ 16,742,000<br />
9. High school science laboratory additions/renovations $ 36,338,317<br />
10. Technology upgrades $ 69,850,000<br />
Total Proposition 1 $ 187,797,315<br />
Proposition 2 – Health, Safety, Environment, Critical Renovations, and Other<br />
District Needs<br />
1. Campus cafeteria kitchen renovation required by the Health Department $ 1,852,787<br />
2. Menchaca Elementary School internal roadway $ 826,836<br />
3. Purchase of low-emission school buses $ 12,205,600<br />
4. Capacitor bank installation to improve balance power demands $ 14,569,913<br />
5. Critical renovations at various campuses $ 37,213,068<br />
6. Upgrade of payroll software $ 1,045,000<br />
7. Replacement of cold storage warehouse $ 6,207,300<br />
Total Proposition 2 $ 73,920,504<br />
Proposition 3 – Special Programs and Expansion<br />
1. District-wide performing arts facility and land acquisition $ 40,000,000<br />
2. Land acquisition for a future south high school $ 32,000,000<br />
3. Classroom addition and Fine Arts renovations at Anderson High School $ 10,000,000<br />
Total Proposition 3 $ 82,000,000<br />
Grand Total $ 343,717,819<br />
Table 75<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 348
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Capital Projects<br />
Campus/Department<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Actual and<br />
Remaining<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
Akins High additions and renovations 430,843 2,785,554 1,078,859 92,132 102,596<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High additions and renovations 397,097 6,897,701 1,342,390 417,609 308,711<br />
New Baldwin Elementary 2,679,664 13,306,899 611,653 174,595 125,703<br />
Barrington Elementary additions and renovations 357,475 2,585,053 82,246 136,579 51,109<br />
Bedichek Middle additions and renovations 3,831,466 288,360 102,923 62,967 67,268<br />
Bowie High science classrooms and renovations 571,670 3,074,674 238,064 137,774 167,910<br />
Burnet Middle renovations and improvements 2,216,908 254,698 71,760 13,278 69,650<br />
Construction Management 22,107,604 36,363,704 17,862,064 18,325,980 16,049,675<br />
Crockett High science classrooms and renovations 200,881 1,783,944 398,741 126,369 166,956<br />
Doss Elementary renovations and improvements 1,597,644 202,407 287,321 115,980 116,092<br />
Eastside Memorial renovations and improvements 3,241,195 1,926,638 237,317 402,261 203,919<br />
New Gorzycki Middle School 23,375,165 1,014,909 210,818 65,504 8,329<br />
Graham Elementary additions and renovations - 12,384 - - 48,049<br />
Hart Elementary additions and renovations 346,137 2,195,364 314,213 32,813 50,417<br />
Information System Admin upgrades 10,605,207 6,785,094 23,878,135 9,862,871 1,836,412<br />
L C Anderson High additions and renovations 1,736,450 8,948,432 2,844,526 465,205 169,290<br />
Langford Elementary additions and renovations 721,161 2,768,911 129,975 133,628 58,010<br />
Lanier High additions and renovations 3,943,228 1,432,769 4,250,939 2,712,277 282,756<br />
New Uphaus Early Childhood Center 155,464 1,149,513 2,373,251 11,880,026 4,351,662<br />
McCallum High additions and renovations 778,526 4,936,654 8,190,791 95,041 99,606<br />
Network Support Group technology upgrades 3,136,024 976,479 2,744,373 48,733 1,510,104<br />
New Performing Arts Center 698,417 8,292 6,579 5,147,664 17,201,184<br />
New Bus Terminal 62,891 9,960 - 2,414,622 1,801,387<br />
New buses and equipment - - - 105 -<br />
New North Central Elementary - - - 1,486,071 14,695,581<br />
New South High School Land - - - - 20,000,000<br />
New Undesignated North Central Elementary #2 3,796,922 11,876,871<br />
Warehouse additions and renovations 4,975,183 5,798,621 4,853,796 3,140,360 48,049<br />
Webb Middle additions and renovations 4,338,214 512,845 304,190 1,253,476 848,855<br />
Wooldridge Elementary additions and renovations 2,615,793 524,237 7,557 13,852 51,579<br />
Grand Total $ 95,120,304 $ 106,544,096 $ 72,422,480 $ 62,554,694 $ 92,367,730<br />
* Totals of those locations that do not amount to more than $3M and/or do not have major renovations or additions.<br />
** Technology upgrades charged to Network Support only as associated with current bond programs.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 349
Table 76<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Capital Projects<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Balance<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
Variance<br />
Positive<br />
(Negative)<br />
% Variance<br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 39,218 $ 13,632 $ 30,768 $ 10,400 $ (20,368) -66.20%<br />
Other Sources 75,733,430 100,807,638 0 - (0) -100.0%<br />
Total Revenues 75,772,648 100,821,270 30,768 10,400 (20,368) -66.20%<br />
Expenditures by Function<br />
Pupil Transportation 2,953,948 3,763,768 180,000 0 (180,000) -100.00%<br />
Plant Maintenance 2,113,277 1,754,374 1,777,269 2,005,423 228,154 12.84%<br />
Data Processing Services 296,311 188,710 63,155 20,055 (43,100) -68.24%<br />
Debt Services 753,804 807,638 0 0 (0) -99.00%<br />
Facilities Acquisition & Construction 100,426,757 65,907,989 70,134,890 32,635,685 (37,499,205) -53.47%<br />
Total Expenditures 106,544,097 72,422,479 72,155,314 34,661,163 (37,494,151) -52.0%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues<br />
Over Expenditures<br />
(30,771,449) 28,398,791 (72,124,546) (34,650,763) 37,473,783<br />
-51.96%<br />
Other Financing Sources (Uses)<br />
Other Resources 0 (0) -100.00%<br />
Other Uses 1 (1) -100.0%<br />
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) - - 1 - (1) -100.0%<br />
Net Change in Fund Balances (30,771,449) 28,398,791 (72,124,545) (34,650,763) 37,473,782 -51.96%<br />
Estimated outstanding purchase<br />
orders and unspent balances at year<br />
end (2,879) (28,250,911)<br />
Fund Balances- September 1 (Beginning) 498,454 (30,272,995) (1,874,204) (74,001,628) (136,903,302) 7304.6%<br />
Fund Balances - August 31 (Ending) (30,272,995) (1,874,204) (74,001,628) (136,903,302) (99,429,520) 134.4%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 350
Table 77<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Projected Construction Timeline<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 351
Bond Program Development<br />
Background of Citizen’s 2008 Bond Advisory Committee<br />
The mission of the <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District is that all students will progress academically and<br />
intellectually, and will graduate prepared for personal success and inspired to contribute to society. To<br />
provide facilities that will accommodate every student’s achievement, the A<strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees created<br />
the Citizens’ 2008 Bond Advisory Committee (CBAC) to make recommendations for district facility needs.<br />
A 21-member Citizens Bond Advisory Committee, appointed by the Board of Trustees and the<br />
Superintendent, worked many months analyzing information and visiting various sites and campuses. The<br />
committee developed recommendations that included projects considered urgent in nature, required by<br />
law, or that needed to be addressed before another comprehensive bond program took place.<br />
In developing a scope of work for the proposed 2008 Bond Program, the CBAC considered a variety of issues<br />
that impact students’ welfare and achievement, as well as taxpayers’ long-term investment in district<br />
facilities. These considerations ranged from providing a district-wide Performing Arts Center to the renovation<br />
of facilities to address failing mechanical systems and the construction of new classrooms to<br />
relieve overcrowded schools. In doing its work, the Committee identified issues that were of immediate<br />
concern and of a critical nature, and if left unattended, would lead to much more expensive remediation in<br />
the long run.<br />
It was the Committee’s job to assess and prioritize needs identified by staff, principals and campus<br />
leaders. At all times, its goal was to develop a scope of work that would minimize the tax impact of the<br />
proposed 2008 Bond Program by focusing on projects of highest need, yet be comprehensive enough to<br />
equitably safeguard the taxpayers’ investment in A<strong>ISD</strong> facilities and grounds. To achieve this end, the<br />
Committee adopted the following criteria to assess the merit of proposed projects:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Narrow focus<br />
Urgent and important<br />
o Building/health code requirements and safety changes<br />
o Graduation requirements<br />
o Relief for schools at 125 percent or more of permanent capacity<br />
o Replacement of building components subject to imminent failure<br />
Making building system improvements critical to energy efficiency and environmental<br />
responsiveness<br />
Takes advantage of time-sensitive opportunities<br />
Minimal tax rate impact<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 352
Bond Area of Focus<br />
I. Academic Achievement<br />
Science Requirements — As a result of state mandates that increase high school graduation<br />
requirements to four years each of science and math, there was an immediate need to add<br />
science classroom laboratories and upgrades in district high schools.<br />
Technology Services — To provide district students with technology services vital in today’s<br />
increasingly technologically dependent world, there was an urgent need to provide adequate<br />
funding for technology services in order to ensure equity throughout the district, support the core<br />
curriculum and provide updated administrative software.<br />
II. Health and Safety<br />
Campus Cafeteria/Kitchen Renovations — Funding for campus cafeteria kitchen renovations in<br />
approximately 40 schools was needed to meet current, more stringent Health Department code<br />
requirements. These required improvements included additional hand wash sinks, dishwashers,<br />
back flow preventers, and other plumbing modifications to ensure wastewater does not encroach<br />
into food preparation areas. Additional Health Department requirements mandated the installation<br />
of impervious ceiling finishes to ensure that the ceilings in food preparation areas and culinary<br />
arts classrooms do not retain odors as a by-product of the cooking process.<br />
Menchaca Elementary Internal Roadway — A priority safety project was the construction of an<br />
internal roadway on the Menchaca Elementary campus to create a parent drop-off and pick-up<br />
traffic loop to ensure safety at morning and afternoon peak traffic periods. This project was<br />
needed prior to the projected widening of both Manchaca Road and FM 1626, which is scheduled<br />
for completion in the next three to five years.<br />
III. Environmental Improvements<br />
Low-Emission School Buses — The funding for low-emission school buses assisted the district in<br />
accelerating the replacement of higher emission buses in the fleet, especially those buses that<br />
are approximately 17 years old. This also demonstrates the district’s commitment to cleaner air<br />
while achieving a fleet with over 60 percent low-emission buses.<br />
Additional buses will be necessary for the transition of magnet transportation services from<br />
Capital Metro to the district over the next four years. As the district offers additional student<br />
choice programs, such as the Global Studies High School, early childhood centers, and other<br />
instructional programming that require transporting students throughout the district, the need for<br />
more buses will increase.<br />
Capacitor Banks — The 2008 Bond Program included approximately $14.5 million for the<br />
installation of capacitor banks to improve balance electrical service needs across the district. The<br />
need for this installation was the result of a directive by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas<br />
(ERCOT) to energy providers, such as <strong>Austin</strong> Energy, to improve their efficiency of transmission<br />
or power factor starting in 2009. Fortunately, the city of <strong>Austin</strong>’s preliminary assessment of district<br />
facilities indicates that a few of the district facilities will require a power factor adjustment. This<br />
means that a substantial part of the allotted $14.5 million will remain in the contingency fund.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 353
IV. Renovations and Upgrades to Protect Taxpayers’ Investments<br />
Payroll Software — The software system for payroll needed to be updated. The district was using<br />
a paper and pencil methodology to collect time and attendance for its employees, the same<br />
system that was used 100 years ago. With new technology available, the district wanted to<br />
purchase the software to electronically capture the time and attendance of employees to ensure<br />
accurate compensation for employees’ services.<br />
Cold-Storage Warehouse — The floor of the cold storage warehouse for the Food Services<br />
Department had expanded or “heaved” upward due to water wicking up, freezing and expanding<br />
the soil under the floor. It was in need of repair or replacement because it serves as storage for<br />
all the frozen food used to provide meals to all A<strong>ISD</strong> students. After a discussion of several<br />
options, the Committee’s recommendation was to replace the existing cold-storage warehouse.<br />
Using the existing space during the construction of the new cold-storage warehouse avoided the<br />
problems involved in having daily deliveries of frozen food items from San Antonio. This also<br />
allowed for easy conversion of the old cold-storage space into much needed dry storage space<br />
for the district.<br />
Scope of Work for Critical Renovations<br />
At several schools across the district, air quality systems, designed around out-dated and nolonger-appropriate<br />
technology, were at the end of their useful lives. These geothermal groundloop<br />
or earth-coupled heat pump systems needed to be replaced with more reliable and<br />
sustainable systems.<br />
In addition, A<strong>ISD</strong> construction management staff developed a list of immediate needs at various<br />
campuses, such as needed restroom repairs. If these items were left unattended, much more<br />
expensive remediation would have been required in the long run. Additional projects needing<br />
immediate attention were submitted by principals and various district-wide departments. These<br />
projects also include items presented during the public forums.<br />
Performing Arts Center<br />
In order to fulfill voter expectations associated with approval of the May 10, 2008 bond<br />
proposition that authorizes expenditures by the district to construct a student performing arts<br />
center, the Board of Trustees and district administration jointly created the Performing Arts Center<br />
Task Force (PACTF).<br />
On April 26, 2011, the Board of Trustees voted to move forward with the purchase of a site for the<br />
district-wide Performing Arts Center (PAC). The approved site is located in the Mueller<br />
development along Mueller Boulevard between 51st Street and Barbara Jordan Boulevard.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 354
Following a comprehensive site selection process and evaluation of 28 proposed sites, A<strong>ISD</strong> staff and the<br />
real-estate consultant recommended the site because it best fits the site selection criteria developed by<br />
the Performing Arts Center Task Force and the district's own site selection criteria including, but not<br />
limited to:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Efficiency of location (for building orientation and public access)<br />
Central location in the district (as compared to other candidate sites)<br />
Availability of utilities<br />
Proximity to mass transit<br />
Potential for mixed use<br />
Availability of nearby amenities and services<br />
This land acquisition and the future construction of the PAC are fully funded through the bond package<br />
approved by voters in 2008. The PAC will provide the district with a much-needed facility to serve not only<br />
the band, orchestra, theater, dance and visual arts students, but also accommodate events such as<br />
assemblies and commencement ceremonies that currently require the district to rent space. A<br />
comprehensive feasibility study was conducted before the site was purchased.<br />
As the process continues, the board-appointed Performing Arts Center Task Force will continue to<br />
oversee the development of the PAC and there will be future opportunities for the community to provide<br />
feedback.<br />
Capital Projects Impact on the General Fund<br />
Given the current budget challenges, the district is considering how the operation of the PAC will affect<br />
future general maintenance and operation (M&O) funds to ensure that the timing of the opening of the<br />
PAC is compatible with the district's budget. If there is a decision to delay the construction of the PAC,<br />
purchasing the land now ensures the district is able to secure a centrally located site and allows the<br />
district to acquire the site at a more advantageous cost than will likely be available at a later time. The<br />
district currently plans to have the PAC completed for the FY2014 school year. The district anticipates the<br />
PAC start-up costs will be approximately $250,000 in <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
The Uphaus Early Childhood Center will open in <strong>FY2013</strong> and a newly constructed elementary school in<br />
North Central <strong>Austin</strong> is projected to open in FY2014. Opening new facilities that were constructed using<br />
the Capital Projects Fund have a significant impact on the district’s operating budget. It currently costs the<br />
district approximately $838,283 to open a new elementary school. If utilities and / or salaries increase in<br />
future years, the total expenditures to open new schools will also increase.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 355
Table 78<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Capital Projects Impact on the General Fund<br />
Project Number Project Name<br />
Current<br />
Construction<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
P06-0016-NEWBT New Bus Terminal $ 10,074,902<br />
Construction of a new bus storage, maintenance and fueling facility. Work includes the construction of an administration<br />
building of approximately 7,614 square feet, and a six-bay shop. A maintenance building of approximately 13,080 square<br />
feet will also be built. The design also includes associated site improvements consisting of parking for 180 buses and staff<br />
parking for 200 vehicles, a bus wash bay and covered fueling area.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 8,000,000<br />
Overhead costs such as terminal administration, utilities, custodial services and other costs of<br />
operating the bus terminal. The new bus terminal will be built with energy efficiency in mind.<br />
P06-0039-SCFLD Construct Soccer Fields $ 1,890,300<br />
Construction of a new competition soccer field complex to include parking, restroom/concessions, playground, walking<br />
track, and practice area. Work also includes associated site improvements consisting of landscaping and on-site storm<br />
water detention facilities.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 13,707<br />
Overhead costs will be determined when a site is selected.<br />
P08-0026-NCES1 New North Central Elementary School $ 19,560,827<br />
Work includes the construction of a new 32-classroom elementary school of approximately 86,000 square feet, with a core<br />
facility that will accommodate a future eight-classroom addition. The design will also include associated site improvements<br />
including play fields, playgrounds, parking lots, bus circulation and automobile drives.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 838,283<br />
Overhead costs such as school administration, utilities, custodial services and other costs not<br />
directly related to classroom instruction are included. The new school will be built with energy<br />
efficiency in mind.<br />
P09-0058-ECCL Acquire Land & Construct New Early Childhood Center $ 20,267,555<br />
Construction of a new Early Childhood Demonstration Center. Work includes the construction of a 24-classroom school<br />
with the ability to accommodate a future eight-classroom addition. The school will be approximately 72,000 square feet in<br />
size, with 78 parking spaces and bus drop-off and pick-up. Included in the school are shared common areas, and<br />
administrative suite, a library/media center, music and art classrooms, multi-purpose spaces and other ancillary and support<br />
spaces.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 838,283<br />
Overhead costs such as school administration, utilities, custodial services and other costs not<br />
directly related to classroom instruction are included. The new school will be built with energy<br />
efficiency in mind.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 356
Project Number<br />
Project Name<br />
Table 78 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Capital Projects Impact on the General Fund<br />
Current<br />
Construction<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
P09-0059-PAC2 Acquire Land & Construct New Performing Arts Center $ 35,065,252<br />
Construction of a new 60,000 square foot Performing Arts Facility to accommodate 1,200 seats. The design includes a<br />
performance stage, seating are, loading dock, dressing rooms, a lobby and concessions area. Site work will include<br />
parking for the facility as well as landscaping and storm water control improvements.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 250,000<br />
Overhead costs such as facility administration, utilities, custodial services and other costs of<br />
operating the performing arts center. The new Performing Arts Center will be built with energy<br />
efficiency in mind.<br />
P09-0072-SHSL Land Acquisition for New South High School $ 32,000,000<br />
Purchase of the land for the New South High School to be built and opened at some future date.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 5,000<br />
Overhead costs for now to include only minimal cleanup and maintenance of the property.<br />
P12-0013-UES Purchase Land and Construct New Undesignated Elementary School $ 25,770,837<br />
Work will include the construction of a new 32-classroom school of approximately 86,000 square feet, with a core facility<br />
that will accommodate a future eight-classroom addition. The design will also include associated site improvement including<br />
play fields, playgrounds, parking lots, bus circulation and automobile drives.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 838,283<br />
Overhead costs such as school administration, utilities, custodial services and other costs not<br />
directly related to classroom instruction are included. The new school will be built with energy<br />
efficiency in mind.<br />
Various Various Technology projects $ 69,850,000<br />
To provide district students with technology services vital in today's increasingly technologically dependent world, there is an<br />
urgent need to provide adequate funding for technology services in order to ensure equity throughout the district, support<br />
the core curriculum and provide updated administrative software.<br />
Operating <strong>Budget</strong> Impact: $ 1,120,000<br />
Overhead costs include annual maintenance agreement costs and staff time to support equipment,<br />
training and systems related to these implementations.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 357
Grant Funds<br />
In addition to the previously discussed Governmental Funds, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> receives grant funds from a<br />
variety of sources. Grant funds have strict provisions and are generally restricted for a specific purpose.<br />
The district may not use these funds for anything other than what is listed in the Notice of Grant Award<br />
(NOGA). Grants have varying time spans. Some grants may be received on an annual basis, while other<br />
grants may be for multiple years for a specific project or program.<br />
Federal Grants<br />
Title I Grants are the largest source of grant funds for the district. Title I funding is intended to provide<br />
additional funding to schools with high numbers or percentages of children from low-income families. It is<br />
estimated A<strong>ISD</strong> will receive and spend more than $31.5 million in Title I funds during the <strong>FY2013</strong> school<br />
year. Five high schools, 11 middle school, and 50 elementary schools in the district will receive Title I<br />
funding.<br />
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) provides funding to assist states and local<br />
educational agencies to educate students with disabilities. IDEA Grants are the next largest source of<br />
grant funding for the district. It is estimated the district will be awarded approximately $18.1 million for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
The district projects it will receive $4.5 million from the federally funded Title II, Teacher & Principal<br />
Training and Recruiting Grant; $3.72 million from the Title III, Part A English Language Acquisitions and<br />
Language Enhancement Grant; and $3.5 million from the Title IV, 21st Century Community Learning<br />
Centers Grant. The 21st Century Grant supports the creation of community learning centers to provide<br />
academic enrichment opportunities during non-school hours for children who attend high-poverty and lowperforming<br />
schools.<br />
It is estimated the district will receive $1.3 million from the Career and Technical Basic Grant, which is<br />
also federally funded. This grant provides funding for secondary and post-secondary career and technical<br />
education programs.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> received $13.8 million from the federal Edujobs Grant in FY2012. Unfortunately, this grant was<br />
meant to be a one-year infusion of revenue, and A<strong>ISD</strong> will not be granted any additional Edujobs Grant<br />
revenue in <strong>FY2013</strong>. The Edujobs Grant helped support full-day pre-kindergarten, provided an additional<br />
planning period at the secondary level, and funded school librarian salaries. The loss of these funds will<br />
shift these expenditures to the General Fund.<br />
Sequestration and Federal Grant Funding<br />
On May 29, 2012, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) informed <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> of the possibility that all<br />
federal grants administered by the TEA may be reduced for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school and grant year by an<br />
amount ranging from 8 to 14 percent. However, on July 25, 2012, the TEA issued new guidance from the<br />
U.S. Department of Education. The process by which this reduction may take place, known as<br />
sequestration, is a provision of the <strong>Budget</strong> Control Act of 2011. If Congress fails to take action by January<br />
2, 2013, federal education spending will be cut for the FY2014 school and grant year. Instead of taking of<br />
sequestered funds from the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year appropriations as communicated on May 29, 2012, the<br />
funds will now be sequestered from the funds that will be available in July 2013 for the FY2014 school<br />
year.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 358
Table 79<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Grant Funding from Federal Sources<br />
Statement of Revenues and Expenditures by Grant<br />
For School Year <strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
Revenues<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
$ Variance<br />
from FY2012<br />
to <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
from FY2012<br />
to <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
5900 Federal Sources<br />
Title I $ 23,704,800 $ 28,425,229 $ 30,971,538 $ 31,799,055 $ 827,517 3%<br />
IDEA Grant 16,190,755 12,572,034 15,149,310 19,499,577 4,350,267 35%<br />
Title II 4,002,130 3,951,933 3,237,133 3,130,006 (107,127) -3%<br />
Title III 3,103,982 2,078,002 2,671,603 2,321,953 (349,650) -17%<br />
Title IV 3,644,626 3,227,128 1,982,630 3,461,630 1,479,000 46%<br />
Career and Technical - Basic Grant 1,279,638 1,248,132 1,189,683 1,051,743 (137,940) -11%<br />
Total Federal Revenues<br />
$ 51,925,931 $ 51,502,458 $ 55,201,897 $ 61,263,964 $ 6,062,067 12%<br />
Expenditures<br />
By Function<br />
11 Instruction 29,451,153 30,624,428 33,612,298 34,703,005 1,090,707 4%<br />
12 Instructional Resources & Media Services 229,087 720,003 112,412 204,801 92,389 13%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development 4,845,749 5,404,606 7,267,785 9,801,868 2,534,083 47%<br />
21 Instructional Administration 3,257,340 1,986,780 2,358,625 2,040,461 (318,164) -16%<br />
23 School Administration 1,575,776 2,089,877 1,842,176 2,417,416 575,240 28%<br />
31 Guidance & Counseling Services 5,472,251 4,172,702 4,203,337 4,130,138 -73,199 -2%<br />
32 Attendance & Social Work Services 836,903 893,364 1,059,809 345,794 (714,015) -80%<br />
33 Health Services 232,943 148,569 155,549 88,360 (67,189) -45%<br />
34 Pupil Transportation 349,036 171,815 250,000 700,000 450,000 262%<br />
35 Food Services 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
36 Co-Curricular Activities 65,206 45,163 64,677 313,480 248,803 551%<br />
41 General Administration 221,108 241,651 288,963 285,599 (3,364) -1%<br />
51 Plant Maintenance 27,569 21,686 45,676 27,035 (18,641) -86%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services 28,198 3,298 6,200 13,610 7,410 225%<br />
53 Data Processing Services 643,932 721,534 571,664 942,998 371,334 51%<br />
61 Community Services 4,689,680 4,256,982 3,362,726 5,249,399 1,886,673 44%<br />
71 Debt Services 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
91 Contracted Instructional Srvcs-Public Schools 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
93 Payments-Shared Services Arrangements 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0%<br />
Total Expenditures $ 51,925,931 $ 51,502,458 $ 55,201,897 $ 61,263,964 $ 6,062,067 10%<br />
*Note: This table provides the Federal Grant information at the time of print. The district is awarded varying amounts each year and<br />
varies depending on the student population.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 359
Corporate and Philanthropic Partnership Support<br />
Despite the recent economic downturn, numerous corporate and philanthropic partners continue to help<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> achieve exemplary results with our students, parents and families. Partners help by providing direct<br />
financial support, by supporting community partners who work with students in our schools and by giving<br />
hundreds of volunteer hours directly to our schools and through our volunteer organization, <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Partners in Education.<br />
In A<strong>ISD</strong>, our strategic partners help teachers and schools address important issues that can impede<br />
student learning. Support from partners improves the overall climate in the school and district for learning<br />
and prepares all students to be ready for college, career and life.<br />
However, A<strong>ISD</strong> continues to anticipate an increasingly strained financial landscape in education, facing<br />
potentially unprecedented cuts in the next five years. We anticipate the need to secure $30 million in<br />
external private funding over the next three years to continue to provide new delivery models, improve the<br />
overall school and district climate for learning and develop academic achievement and support strategies<br />
for special populations through accelerated and differentiated instruction. Without the direct financial and<br />
volunteer support that partners provide, A<strong>ISD</strong> will not be able to continue to provide new delivery models,<br />
improve the overall school and district climate for learning and develop academic achievement and<br />
support strategies for special populations through accelerated and differentiated instruction. A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
appreciates those partners who have invested with a long-term view and welcome others who may want<br />
to join us in creating an exceptional educational experience.<br />
In FY2010, a Comprehensive Resource Development Needs Assessment, which surveyed 1,000 district<br />
staff and external partners, showed that the district is poised for a partnership and investment<br />
renaissance if it can leverage its relationship strengths, reduce confusion and duplication of effort and<br />
improve shared accountability.<br />
To meet this need, A<strong>ISD</strong> established the Office of Innovation and Development (IAD) to provide a<br />
centralized location for partner support for external resource development. IAD brings significant new<br />
external resources to the school district to support initiatives deemed crucial to the progress of the district,<br />
creating a coherent and strategic infrastructure to bring in the highest possible yield of both public and<br />
private funds to enable the district to carry out its Strategic Plan.<br />
IAD now provides resource development and management supports and services to district, campus and<br />
individual staff and external partners including:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Creating opportunities to share innovative program investments with external partners<br />
Identifying and sharing funding opportunities<br />
Facilitating and writing strategic funding proposals<br />
Providing technical assistance for grant writing and grant management, trainings, workshops and<br />
individual professional development opportunities, and access to online funding resources.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 360
Partners<br />
Building strategic partnerships and creating district-wide priorities allows the district to provide new<br />
delivery models, duplicate best practices and accelerate effective programming. A<strong>ISD</strong>’s Office of<br />
Innovation and Development is proud to work with the following partners who are active participants in the<br />
district’s growth:<br />
3M Foundation<br />
Applied Materials<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Chamber of Commerce<br />
Buena Vista Foundation<br />
City of <strong>Austin</strong><br />
E3 Alliance<br />
Bill & Melinda<br />
Gates Foundation<br />
Google<br />
HEB<br />
IBM<br />
Intel<br />
KDK Harman Foundation<br />
Kennedy Center<br />
KLE Foundation<br />
Klein Family Foundation<br />
Matt Foundation<br />
Michael & Susan<br />
Dell Foundation (MSDF)<br />
Moody Foundation<br />
Mueller Foundation<br />
National Instruments<br />
NoVo Foundation<br />
RGK Foundation<br />
Seedling Foundation<br />
Seton Family of Hospitals<br />
Skillpoint Alliance<br />
Sooch Foundation<br />
St. David’s Foundation<br />
Tapestry Foundation<br />
Target<br />
Teacher Heaven<br />
Time Warner Cable<br />
United Way–Capital Area<br />
Univision<br />
Wells Fargo<br />
Whole Foods<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 361
The Office of Innovation and Development (IAD) has submitted more than $14.7 million in grants to date,<br />
and has been awarded approximately $6.9 million to date (many grants are still pending). IAD has also<br />
seen a 50 percent growth in partnerships over the past year. Highlights of key grants awarded include:<br />
TEA Texas Literacy Initiative<br />
Grant (Striving Readers) -<br />
$5,130,000: A<strong>ISD</strong> was awarded<br />
these funds to support the<br />
district’s literacy plan, and to<br />
enhance literacy instruction from<br />
early childhood through high<br />
school in the Travis and Lanier<br />
vertical teams.<br />
NoVo Foundation CASEL -<br />
$750,000: A<strong>ISD</strong> was recognized<br />
as one of eight districts nationally<br />
to join a cohort with the Center for<br />
Academic and Social Emotional<br />
Learning. Funds awarded from the<br />
NoVo Foundation will support the<br />
expansion of Social Emotional<br />
Learning Initiative to A<strong>ISD</strong> schools<br />
and district staff.<br />
Dairy Max’s Fuel Up to Play 60 Grant - $320,000: All 81 A<strong>ISD</strong> elementary schools were recently<br />
awarded “Fuel Up to Play” grants from Dairy Max. Each school is receiving $4,000 to increase<br />
physical activity while learning fundamental mathematics, science and nutrition.<br />
RGK Foundation Middle Schools, Let’s Move! Program- $150,000: A<strong>ISD</strong> was awarded this grant<br />
to expand HOPSports! at all A<strong>ISD</strong> Middle Schools. HOPSports is a system that combines movement<br />
and technology by integrating music, art, movement, nutrition, social messaging, environmental<br />
awareness and career consciousness. The HOPSports lessons are captivating to students and<br />
enable physical education instructors to monitor their students at greater depth.<br />
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation $100,000: In January 2012, the Bill & Melinda Gates<br />
Foundation awarded $100,000 in funding to support the development of the <strong>Austin</strong> District-Charter<br />
Collaboration Compact.<br />
Target Literacy Grant, ACE expansion - $100,000: A<strong>ISD</strong> was awarded this grant to expand early<br />
literacy tutoring programming through the ACE program in A<strong>ISD</strong>, providing low-income schools with<br />
highly trained AmeriCorps tutors to ensure that children advance to grade level in reading before third<br />
grade.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 362
3M Shoot n’ Share Camcorder Product Donation - $74,000 (in-kind): All A<strong>ISD</strong> schools were<br />
awarded camcorders amounting to $74,000 in in-kind product donation from 3M. The donated<br />
camcorders will be used to improve the instructional quality and hands-on interaction skills with<br />
technology between student and instructor.<br />
KDK Harman Foundation’s 2012 Summer STEM and Robotics Academy - $50,000: The Eastside<br />
Memorial Vertical Team was awarded a second year of funding for this three-week summer academy<br />
that incorporates STEM and robotics-focused instruction to 180 rising fifth and sixth graders.<br />
Teachers will also receive Robotics Professional Development.<br />
Sooch Foundation - $20,000: A<strong>ISD</strong> will receive support to launch a cutting-edge, multicultural<br />
outreach radio program for the A<strong>ISD</strong> community.<br />
Intel’s <strong>Austin</strong> Mini-Educator Academy Grant - $15,000: A<strong>ISD</strong> was awarded this grant to provide 15<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> teachers with the knowledge, skills and resources to assist and motivate students in the<br />
development of science fair projects. It will also provide teachers with models and best practices for<br />
providing students with research-based courses and experiences.<br />
mindPOP/Kennedy Center Any Given Child program: The John F. Kennedy Center for the<br />
Performing Arts has chosen <strong>Austin</strong> as the seventh partner city for Any Given Child, a program that<br />
creates a long-range arts education plan for students in grades K-8. The program will incorporate<br />
existing A<strong>ISD</strong> resources, along with those of local arts organizations and the Kennedy Center, to<br />
create a plan for arts education specific to the city. A working group from Any Given Child is currently<br />
assessing the district’s fine arts programs to create a strategic plan to guide our work. A preliminary<br />
analysis of A<strong>ISD</strong> students who are highly engaged in fine arts mirrors national studies.<br />
For more information about IAD or how you can support the district in meeting its external private funding<br />
goal, please visit the website at www.austinisd.org/IAD. For information on news and current funding<br />
opportunities, visit http://aisdinnovation.blogspot.com/<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 363
Proprietary Funds<br />
Proprietary funds focus on the determination of operating income, changes in net assets (or cost<br />
recovery), financial position and cash flows. There are two different types of proprietary funds: enterprise<br />
funds and internal service funds. Proprietary funds report an activity for which a fee is charged to external<br />
users for good or services. Internal service funds account for the financing of goods or services provided<br />
by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the governmental unit, or to other<br />
governmental units, on a cost-reimbursable basis.<br />
Table 80<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Propriety Funds – Print Shop Reproduction<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Net Assets<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 322,080 $ 343,133 $ 296,187 $ 460,000 $ 163,813 55.3%<br />
Total Revenues 322,080 343,133 296,187 460,000 163,813 55.3%<br />
Expenditures<br />
Current<br />
41 General Administration 368,997 398,864 296,187 460,000 163,813 55.3%<br />
Total Expenditures 368,997 398,864 296,187 460,000 163,813 55.3%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of<br />
Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
Total Net Assets - Sept.1<br />
(Beginning)<br />
Total Net Assets - Aug. 31<br />
(Ending)<br />
(46,917) (55,731) - - - 0.0%<br />
298,593 251,676 195,945 195,945 - 0.0%<br />
$ 251,676 $ 195,945 $ 195,945 $ 195,945 $ - 0.0%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 364
Table 81<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Propriety Funds – Worker’s Compensation Fund<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Net Assets<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 2,297,388 $ 2,189,370 $ 2,524,436 $ 3,020,936 $ 496,500 19.7%<br />
Total Revenues 2,297,388 2,189,370 2,524,436 3,020,936 496,500 19.7%<br />
Expenditures<br />
Current<br />
41 General Administration 2,594,713 2,606,514 2,524,436 3,020,936 $ 496,500 19.7%<br />
Total Expenditures 2,594,713 2,606,514 2,524,436 3,020,936 496,500 19.7%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of<br />
Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
Total Net Assets - Sept.1<br />
(Beginning)<br />
Total Net Assets - Aug. 31<br />
(Ending)<br />
(297,325) (417,144) - - - 0.0%<br />
20,820,431 20,523,106 20,105,962 20,105,962 - 0.0%<br />
$ 20,523,106 $ 20,105,962 $ 20,105,962 $ 20,105,962 $ - 0.0%<br />
Table 82<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Propriety Funds – Health Insurance Fund<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Net Assets<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 5,093,911 $ 70,662,799 $ 64,941,269 $ 69,060,894 $ 4,119,625 6.3%<br />
Total Revenues 5,093,911 70,662,799 64,941,269 69,060,894 4,119,625 6.3%<br />
Expenditures<br />
Current<br />
41 General Administration 96,276 71,255,581 64,941,269 69,060,894 $ 4,119,625 6.3%<br />
Total Expenditures 96,276 71,255,581 64,941,269 69,060,894 4,119,625 6.3%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of<br />
Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
Total Net Assets - Sept.1<br />
(Beginning)<br />
Total Net Assets - Aug. 31<br />
(Ending)<br />
4,997,635 (592,782) - - - 0.0%<br />
- 4,997,635 4,404,853 4,404,853 - 0.0%<br />
$ 4,997,635 $ 4,404,853 $ 4,404,853 $ 4,404,853 $ - 0.0%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 365
Table 83<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Propriety Funds – Laundry Service<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Net Assets<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 254,393 $ 257,828 $ 249,543 $ 244,727 $ (4,816) -1.9%<br />
Total Revenues 254,393 257,828 249,543 244,727 (4,816) -1.9%<br />
Expenditures<br />
Current<br />
41 General Administration 209,720 220,004 249,543 244,727 $ (4,816) -1.9%<br />
Total Expenditures 209,720 220,004 249,543 244,727 (4,816) -1.9%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of<br />
Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
Total Net Assets - Sept.1<br />
(Beginning)<br />
Total Net Assets - Aug. 31<br />
(Ending)<br />
44,673 37,824 - - - 0.0%<br />
500,399 545,072 582,896 582,896 - 0.0%<br />
$ 545,072 $ 582,896 $ 582,896 $ 582,896 $ - 0.0%<br />
Table 84<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Propriety Funds – District Police<br />
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures by Function, and Changes in Fund Net Assets<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> with Comparative Data for Prior Years<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
<strong>Budget</strong><br />
% Variance<br />
Increase<br />
(Decrease)<br />
% Variance<br />
FY2012 and<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Revenues<br />
Local Sources $ 618,890 $ 473,089 $ 640,042 $ 627,016 $ (13,026) -2.0%<br />
Total Revenues 618,890 473,089 640,042 627,016 (13,026) -2.0%<br />
Expenditures<br />
Current<br />
41 General Administration 616,601 534,297 627,016 627,016 $ - 0.0%<br />
Total Expenditures 616,601 534,297 627,016 627,016 - 0.0%<br />
Excess (Deficiency) of<br />
Revenues Over<br />
Expenditures<br />
2,289 (61,208) 13,026 - (13,026) 0.0%<br />
Transfers In 48,182<br />
Total Net Assets - Sept.1<br />
(Beginning)<br />
Total Net Assets - Aug. 31<br />
(Ending)<br />
(2,289) - (13,026) - 13,026 -100.0%<br />
$ - $ (13,026) $ - $ - $ - 0.0%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 366
AUSTIN Independent School District<br />
Information
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Information Section<br />
The Information Section provides specific information about taxable values, tax rates, the impact of the<br />
tax levy on a single family residence, student information, staffing, future year budget projections, building<br />
and square footage data, benchmarks, local and urban peer comparisons, food services, transportation,<br />
risk management, academic programs, accountability indicators, academic assessment and<br />
accountability, parent survey results, accomplishments, demographics, and local statistics.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Carruth Administration Center, 1111 West 6 th Street, <strong>Austin</strong>, TX 78703<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 367
Taxable Value Information<br />
The District received the preliminary and certified taxable value information from the Travis Central<br />
Appraisal District (TCAD) in May and in July respectively. Property taxes are calculated on net taxable<br />
value after allowable exemptions and freeze tax ceilings are subtracted. Taxes are calculated on each<br />
$100 of net taxable value. Tax levy of the freeze portion is calculated by TCAD and provided to the<br />
District. This amount is added to current net taxable levy to arrive at the total levy. Revenues for current<br />
property taxes are based on a 99% collection rate.<br />
On January 1 st of each year the property values are rendered for appraisal. The appraisal process is<br />
conducted by the TCAD. TCAD is scheduled to submit preliminary values to the school district by May 1 st .<br />
These values are usually a conservative estimate of the ultimate certified values that are released on or<br />
before July 25 th . Once the certified values are received by the district, the budget process and tax rate<br />
adoption can be completed for the upcoming school year.<br />
Table 85<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Net Taxable Value Summary<br />
2012 Certification <strong>FY2013</strong> School Year<br />
Taxable Values<br />
Net Taxable Value (before freeze) $<br />
64,852,952,572<br />
Less: Freeze Taxable Value $<br />
(5,742,370,929)<br />
Net Taxable Value (after freeze) $<br />
59,110,581,643<br />
Increase (Decrease) Over Prior Year $<br />
2,235,137,507<br />
% Increase (Decrease) Over Prior Year 3.93%<br />
Net Taxable Levy $<br />
734,153,424<br />
Freeze Ceiling Taxes $<br />
37,600,000<br />
Total Levy $<br />
771,753,424<br />
% Actual Collections to Levy 99.00%<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> - Current<br />
Local Maintenance $<br />
663,763,869<br />
Debt Service $<br />
100,272,021<br />
Total $<br />
764,035,890<br />
Over the last ten years, the district’s taxable value growth has averaged 5.2 percent. The largest growth<br />
was in 2006 when the certified taxable value increased 14.4 percent and the smallest was in 2004 when<br />
the taxable property value decreased 3.9 percent. The net taxable property value for the A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
will increase by $2.2 billion or 3.9 percent over FY2012. Future year forecasts through FY2015 indicate<br />
property tax values will gradually increase with an annual growth rate ranging from 2.2 percent to 2.4<br />
percent.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 368
Billions<br />
2003 Certified<br />
2004 Certified<br />
2005 Certified<br />
2006 Certified<br />
2007 Certified<br />
2008 Certified<br />
2009 Certified<br />
2010 Certified<br />
2011 Certified<br />
2012 Certified<br />
2013 Projected<br />
2014 Projected<br />
Increases in home values generally lead to higher tax bills. Texas law limits the amount that a house<br />
value can increase from one year to the next. Under the state’s 10 percent appraisal cap policy, even if a<br />
home value goes up by more than 10 percent in one year, the homeowner will not have to pay a tax<br />
increase beyond the 10 percent in that one-year period.<br />
Table 86<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Net Taxable Value History and Projections<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50.570<br />
56.267 57.795<br />
56.281 56.875<br />
59.111<br />
60.504<br />
61.822<br />
50<br />
40.192<br />
38.928<br />
44.525<br />
40<br />
41.826<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
-<br />
Tax Year<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 369
Table 87<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Appraised Value and Net Taxable Value Comparison<br />
Tax Year as of<br />
Jan 1 Appraised Value Net Taxable Value % Change<br />
2005 Certified 45,220,204,020 38,927,581,137 -3.15%<br />
2006 Certified 52,002,032,729 44,525,141,427 14.38%<br />
2007 Certified 57,529,363,484 50,570,268,178 13.58%<br />
2008 Certified 66,020,279,293 56,266,583,957 11.26%<br />
2009 Certified 67,348,249,511 57,794,696,337 2.72%<br />
2010 Certified 64,829,368,183 56,280,681,272 -2.62%<br />
2011 Certified 66,849,047,224 56,875,444,136 1.06%<br />
2012 Certified 77,976,307,203 59,110,581,643 3.93%<br />
2013 Projected 78,988,511,303 60,504,376,265 2.36%<br />
2014 Projected 80,306,598,828 61,822,463,790 2.18%<br />
The tax levy is calculated from the net taxable value at a 99% collection rate. The actual taxes to be<br />
collected on the Freeze Taxable Values for patrons, who are over 65 years old, are calculated separately<br />
and then added back. The above table represents the historical net taxable value, the current fiscal year<br />
and future projections.<br />
The frozen ceiling taxes are authorized under a local provision that provides an “over 65 exemption”,<br />
which allows patrons who are at 65 years of age to not be subject to increased taxes regardless of what<br />
happens to their property values or the district tax rates. Their taxes are essentially frozen. The<br />
combination of the net taxable value levy and the levy on frozen values equals the total levy for the year.<br />
The tax collections from local property values are the largest source of income for the district. The total<br />
tax rate is comprised of two component rates, each having separate purposes and state laws governing<br />
them – Maintenance and Operations (M&O) and Interest and Sinking (I&S).<br />
The M&O tax rate supports the major operational and education programs of the district whereas the I&S<br />
tax rate supports the repayment of bonded debts that were authorized by the <strong>Austin</strong> voters. The tax rate<br />
for <strong>FY2013</strong> will remain at $1.079 for Maintenance and Operations (M&O) and the Interest and Sinking<br />
fund tax rate will remain at $0.163 per hundred dollars of assessed value. The total tax rate for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
will be $1.242.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 370
Table 88<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Total Tax Levy<br />
Forecasts<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014 FY2015<br />
Taxable Values<br />
Net Taxable Value (before freeze) $ 64,460,255,568 $ 61,570,945,154 $ 61,870,932,381 $ 64,852,952,572 $ 65,904,376,265 $ 67,222,463,790<br />
Less: Freeze Taxable Value $ (6,665,559,231) $ (5,290,263,882) $ (4,995,488,245) $ (5,742,370,929) $ (5,400,000,000) $ (5,400,000,000)<br />
Net Taxable Value (after freeze) $ 57,794,696,337 $ 56,280,681,272 $ 56,875,444,136 $ 59,110,581,643 $ 60,504,376,265 $ 61,822,463,790<br />
Increase (Decrease) Over Prior Year $ 1,528,112,380 $ (1,514,015,065) $ 594,762,864 $ 2,235,137,507 $ 1,393,794,622 $ 1,318,087,525<br />
% Increase (Decrease) Over Prior Year 2.7158% -2.6196% 1.0568% 3.9299% 2.3579% 2.1785%<br />
Net Taxable Levy $ 694,692,250 $ 690,563,959 $ 706,393,016 $ 734,153,424 $ 751,464,353 $ 767,835,000<br />
Freeze Ceiling Taxes $ 30,106,823 $ 28,405,788 $ 32,000,000 $ 37,600,000 $ 37,600,000 $ 37,600,000<br />
Total Levy $ 724,799,073 $ 718,969,747 $ 738,393,016 $ 771,753,424 $ 789,064,353 $ 805,435,000<br />
% Actual Collections to Levy 97.80% 97.80% 97.80% 99.00% 99.00% 99.00%<br />
Tax Rates<br />
Local Maintenance 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079<br />
Debt Service 0.123 0.148 0.163 0.163 0.163 0.163<br />
Total 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242 1.242 1.242<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>ed Tax Levies<br />
Local Maintenance $ 636,316,905 $ 618,338,593 $ 627,373,664 $ 663,763,869 $ 678,652,522 $ 692,732,465<br />
Debt Service $ 72,536,589 $ 84,813,820 $ 94,774,706 $ 100,272,021 $ 102,521,187 $ 104,648,185<br />
Total $ 708,853,493 $ 703,152,413 $ 722,148,370 $ 764,035,890 $ 781,173,710 $ 797,380,650<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 371
Combined Tax Rate<br />
1.5000<br />
1.5000<br />
1.5000<br />
1.5000<br />
1.3700<br />
1.0400<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
1.0790<br />
Table 89<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Tax Rate History<br />
1.8000<br />
1.6000<br />
1.5964 1.6137 1.6230 1.6230<br />
1.4930<br />
1.4000<br />
1.2000<br />
1.1630 1.2020 1.2020 1.2270 1.2420 1.2420<br />
1.0000<br />
0.8000<br />
0.6000<br />
0.4000<br />
0.2000<br />
0.0000<br />
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Interest & Sinking<br />
Maintenance & Operations<br />
Despite the increase that was approved by voters in FY2009, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will have the second lowest tax<br />
rate in <strong>FY2013</strong> when compared to other local school districts in the metro area. The below table illustrates<br />
the local <strong>FY2013</strong> tax rates for Eanes <strong>ISD</strong>, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>, Lake Travis <strong>ISD</strong>, Round Rock <strong>ISD</strong>, Leander <strong>ISD</strong>,<br />
Pflugerville <strong>ISD</strong>, Hays C<strong>ISD</strong>, Bastrop <strong>ISD</strong>, Manor <strong>ISD</strong>, and Del Valle <strong>ISD</strong>.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 372
Table 90<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Central Texas School District Property Tax Rates<br />
$1.6000<br />
$1.4000<br />
$1.2000<br />
$1.0000<br />
$0.8000<br />
$0.6000<br />
$0.4000<br />
$0.2000<br />
$-<br />
$1.2125<br />
Eanes <strong>ISD</strong><br />
M&O<br />
I&S<br />
$1.242<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.380<br />
Round<br />
Rock <strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.4075<br />
Lake<br />
Travis <strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.4613<br />
Hays<br />
C<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.481<br />
Bastrop<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.5119<br />
Leander<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.515<br />
Manor<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
$1.530 $1.540<br />
Del Valle<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pfluger<br />
ville <strong>ISD</strong><br />
I&S $0.1725 $0.1630 $0.3400 $0.3675 $0.4213 $0.4410 $0.4719 $0.4750 $0.4900 $0.5000<br />
M&O $1.0400 $1.0790 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 373
Impact of Tax Levy on Single Family Residence<br />
As illustrated in the table below, there is a significant difference between the average residential median<br />
value and the residential average market value in relationship to residential property values and their<br />
respective tax levy. In general, median residential values tend to illustrate a more accurate representation<br />
of residential values since they are not skewed by the most expensive outlier residential values. For<br />
example, if there were nine residences valued at $200,000 and one residence valued at $1,000,000 the<br />
median home value would be $200,000 and the average home value would be $280,000.<br />
Table 91<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Analysis of Tax Burden per Travis Central Appraisal District (TCAD)<br />
Certified as of<br />
07-25-2012<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Median Market Value of Residence $ 222,549 $ 215,174 $ 210,065 $ 208,234<br />
Median Taxable Value 194,430 195,361 192,980 191,358<br />
Tax Rate per $100 Value 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242<br />
Tax Levy on Median Residence 2,337 2,397 2,397 2,377<br />
Net Increase In Tax Levy 60 (0) (20)<br />
Avg Market Value of Residence $ 277,663 $ 265,573 $ 261,793 $ 262,167<br />
Avg Taxable Value 248,405 245,593 243,966 244,534<br />
Tax Rate per $100 Value 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242<br />
Tax Levy on Average Residence 2,986 3,013 3,030 3,037<br />
Net Increase In Tax Levy 28 17 7<br />
Median Home Value Analysis - Taxes to fund programs and services for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year will<br />
decrease by an estimated $20 for the median homeowner due to a slight decrease in the median value.<br />
This is based on a residence’s median market value of $208,234 (with a median taxable value of<br />
$191,358) in <strong>FY2013</strong> at a tax rate of $1.242/per $100 assessed value. This is a slight decrease when<br />
compared to the median prior year FY2012 market value of $210,065 (with average taxable value of<br />
$192,980) at the same tax rate of $1.242/per $100. Based on preliminary values as of May 2012, the tax<br />
bill in FY2012 for a $210,065 home will be $2,397 and the tax bill in <strong>FY2013</strong> for the same home (now<br />
valued at $208,234) will be $2,377.<br />
Average Home Value Analysis - Taxes for the <strong>FY2013</strong> school year will increase by an estimated $7 for<br />
the average homeowner due to a slight increase in the average market value. This is based on a<br />
residence’s average market value of $262,167 (with average taxable value of $244,534) in <strong>FY2013</strong> at a<br />
tax rate of $1.242/per $100 assessed value. This is a slight increase when compared to the average prior<br />
year FY2012 market value of $261,793 (with average taxable value of $243,966) at the same tax rate of<br />
$1.242/per $100. Based on the certified values as of July 2012, the tax bill in FY2012 for a $261,793<br />
home will be $3,030 and the tax bill in <strong>FY2013</strong> for the same home (now valued at $262,167) will be<br />
$3,037.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 374
The state limits how much a school district can increase its tax rate from the previous year. Each taxing<br />
entity must calculate its rollback rate. The rollback rate is the maximum rate that can be adopted before<br />
an automatic rollback election takes place. If the district adopts a tax rate that is higher than the rollback<br />
rate, voters can either affirm the proposed higher rate through an election or roll it back to the rollback<br />
rate. Also, individual property value increases are capped annually at 10 percent.<br />
Table 92<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Property Tax Levies & Collections - Last Ten Years and Current<br />
Fiscal<br />
Year<br />
M & O<br />
Tax Rate<br />
(per<br />
$100)<br />
I & S<br />
Tax Rate<br />
(per<br />
$100)<br />
Total Tax<br />
Rate Taxable Values Total Levy<br />
Current Taxes<br />
Collected<br />
% Current<br />
Taxes<br />
Collected<br />
Current &<br />
Delinquent<br />
Taxes<br />
Collected<br />
% Total<br />
Taxes<br />
Collected<br />
FY2003 $ 1.5000 $ 0.0964 $ 1.5964 $ 41,826,379,899 $ 645,328,942 $ 632,232,088 97.97% $ 637,105,359 98.73%<br />
FY2004 $ 1.5000 $ 0.1137 $ 1.6137 $ 40,163,473,828 $ 625,646,692 $ 615,576,354 98.39% $ 615,450,009 ** 98.37%<br />
FY2005 $ 1.5000 $ 0.1230 $ 1.6230 $ 37,029,373,733 $ 627,875,845 $ 615,107,399 97.97% $ 620,113,860 98.76%<br />
FY2006 $ 1.5000 $ 0.1230 $ 1.6230 $ 38,942,363,722 $ 660,847,938 $ 650,259,016 98.40% $ 655,751,207 99.23%<br />
FY2007 $ 1.3700 $ 0.1230 $ 1.4930 $ 44,977,962,403 $ 703,429,341 $ 693,467,966 98.58% $ 698,376,009 99.28%<br />
FY2008 $ 1.0400 $ 0.1230 $ 1.1630 $ 50,570,268,178 $ 615,951,380 $ 607,501,666 98.63% $ 610,922,550 99.18%<br />
FY2009 $ 1.0790 $ 0.1230 $ 1.2020 $ 56,266,583,957 $ 707,212,375 $ 697,204,000 98.58% $ 700,653,997 99.07%<br />
FY2010 $ 1.0790 $ 0.1230 $ 1.2020 $ 58,749,409,539 $ 740,792,902 $ 727,171,963 98.16% $ 730,884,132 * 98.66%<br />
FY2011 $ 1.0790 $ 0.1480 $ 1.2270 $ 56,280,681,272 $ 733,690,916 $ 723,927,282 98.67% $ 728,789,212 * 99.33%<br />
FY2012 $ 1.0790 $ 0.1630 $ 1.2420 $ 56,875,444,136 $ 751,534,334 $ 741,458,395 98.66% $ 733,914,932 97.66%<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> $ 1.0790 $ 0.1630 $ 1.2420 $ 59,110,581,643 $ 771,753,024 N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />
* Estimated<br />
** Delinquent tax collection included a negative adjustment of $45,218<br />
Table 93<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2012 Top Ten Taxpayers (Real and Personal Properties Included)<br />
Name of Taxpayer Nature of Property 2012 Taxable Value<br />
Percent of Net<br />
Taxable Valuation<br />
TPG-300 West 6th Street LLC Real Estate 550,839,908 0.93%<br />
Columbia St Davids Health Care Health Care 469,135,119 0.79%<br />
Freescale Semiconductor Inc Electronics Manufacturer 328,346,199 0.56%<br />
IBM Corporation Electronics Manufacturer 240,007,154 0.41%<br />
CJUF II Stratus Block 21 LLC Real Estate 154,642,842 0.26%<br />
H E Butt Grocery Company LP Grocery Company 134,197,978 0.23%<br />
National Instruments Corportion Electronics Manufacturer 132,970,356 0.22%<br />
SW Bell Telephone Telephone Utility 130,219,401 0.22%<br />
Advanced Micro Devices Inc Electronics Manufacturer 122,106,951 0.21%<br />
Home Depot USA Inc Retail Company 112,561,758 0.19%<br />
$ 2,375,027,666 4.02%<br />
Source: Travis Central Appraisal District<br />
Net Freeze Adjusted Taxable Value $59,110,581,643<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 375
Student Information<br />
The district employs an independent professional demographer to analyze and update the total student<br />
enrollment projection for several years into the future. The demographer researches the latest trends in<br />
housing, birth rates, building permits, developer plats and any other pertinent demographic information.<br />
The information from these reports become an integral part of the district’s decision making and planning<br />
process for capital improvement needs and campus boundary changes. The below table presents student<br />
enrollment history for the last ten years and projections for the next five years.<br />
Table 94<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Enrollment History and Projections<br />
94,000<br />
92,000<br />
90,000<br />
88,000<br />
86,000<br />
84,000<br />
82,000<br />
80,000<br />
78,759<br />
79,896<br />
81,295<br />
82,063<br />
82,739<br />
83,033<br />
88,978<br />
86,724 87,336<br />
85,273<br />
84,245<br />
90,186<br />
91,777<br />
93,140<br />
78,000<br />
76,000<br />
78,408<br />
FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Est<br />
FY2014<br />
Est<br />
FY2015<br />
Est<br />
FY2016 FY2017<br />
Est Est<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 376
Table 95<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Enrollment Five Year History by Campus<br />
Campus Name/Number<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY 2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Projected<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
High Schools<br />
Akins 017 2,588 2,650 2,655 2,733 2,696<br />
Anderson 009 2,084 1,984 2,089 2,045 2,048<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> 002 2,290 2,350 2,287 2,252 2,199<br />
Bowie 013 2,752 2,805 2,874 2,892 2,878<br />
Crockett 008 1,809 1,732 1,642 1,561 1,557<br />
Eastside Memorial 019 - - - 633 652<br />
Global Tech 020 - 202 260 - -<br />
Green Tech 019 531 443 405 - -<br />
International 029 217 237 180 136 150<br />
Lanier 004 1,525 1,433 1,510 1,671 1,668<br />
Lanier Graduation Pathways 026 - - - - 120<br />
LASA 018 858 870 878 942 927<br />
LBJ Comprehensive 014 1,007 977 952 909 929<br />
McCallum 005 1,703 1,751 1,775 1,762 1,766<br />
Reagan 006 885 866 806 1,024 1,038<br />
Richards SYWL 028 332 437 526 618 715<br />
Travis 007 1,405 1,332 1,339 1,473 1,521<br />
Travis Garduation Pathways 025 - - - - 120<br />
High School Total 19,986 20,069 20,178 20,651 20,984<br />
Middle Schools<br />
Bailey 059 1,203 956 1,035 988 973<br />
Bedichek 054 1,115 1,021 1,052 1,026 1,051<br />
Burnet 046 917 960 994 1,030 1,048<br />
Covington 057 954 951 807 732 700<br />
Dobie 055 570 597 615 666 741<br />
Fulmore 043 1,040 1,010 990 1,043 1,040<br />
Garcia 056 656 693 662 421 513<br />
Gorzycki 062 - 834 963 1,077 1,090<br />
Kealing 044 1,260 1,240 1,223 1,215 1,205<br />
Lamar 045 780 663 598 564 599<br />
Martin 051 746 677 646 598 534<br />
Mendez 058 888 865 879 999 1,041<br />
Murchison 052 1,161 1,244 1,274 1,360 1,383<br />
O. Henry 047 974 1,004 1,026 1,028 1,037<br />
Paredes 061 947 889 933 1,032 1,086<br />
Pearce 048 519 457 329 544 563<br />
Small 060 1,183 949 951 925 955<br />
Webb 053 519 572 580 662 735<br />
Middle School Total 15,432 15,582 15,557 15,910 16,294<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 377
Table 95 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Enrollment Five Year History by Campus<br />
Campus Name/Number<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY 2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Projected<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
Elementary Schools<br />
Allan 142 384 388 379 365 -<br />
Allison 101 512 529 555 527 536<br />
Andrews 102 620 572 701 715 723<br />
Baldwin - - 506 650 681<br />
Baranoff 182 854 852 873 955 984<br />
Barrington 149 871 926 994 1,104 774<br />
Barton Hills 103 372 375 388 391 377<br />
Becker 104 192 189 208 280 306<br />
Blackshear 105 265 241 247 239 238<br />
Blanton 106 536 560 588 580 580<br />
Blazier 185 607 727 776 854 895<br />
Boone 170 555 485 501 508 524<br />
Brentwood 107 447 477 488 518 528<br />
Brooke 108 410 414 433 408 402<br />
Brown 109 519 502 521 494 482<br />
Bryker Woods 110 400 400 405 379 377<br />
Campbell 111 379 393 360 316 316<br />
Casey 173 665 656 673 643 636<br />
Casis 112 829 815 821 846 857<br />
Clayton 184 985 970 871 885 873<br />
Cook 161 904 900 908 955 965<br />
Cowan 183 704 742 781 790 808<br />
Cunningham 113 537 556 513 490 480<br />
Davis 179 620 703 676 687 696<br />
Dawson 114 333 333 329 340 342<br />
Doss 154 672 721 774 790 816<br />
Galindo 176 717 719 701 677 676<br />
Govalle 116 414 402 400 478 587<br />
Graham 159 617 658 755 818 755<br />
Gullett 117 482 527 540 564 572<br />
Harris 118 710 737 758 728 734<br />
Hart 163 822 850 892 961 840<br />
Highland Park 119 600 634 660 648 657<br />
Hill 155 707 691 735 769 794<br />
Houston 162 941 958 920 898 882<br />
IDEA Allan Academy (K-5) 192 - - - - 244<br />
Jordan 178 736 810 831 848 763<br />
Joslin 120 336 323 362 320 330<br />
Kiker 180 711 907 932 945 952<br />
Kocurek 172 677 639 663 659 669<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 378
Table 95 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Enrollment Five Year History by Campus<br />
Campus Name/Number<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY 2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Projected<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
83,033 84,996<br />
Elementary Schools, continued<br />
Langford 168 843 843 847 807 807<br />
Lee 121 406 441 427 403 396<br />
Linder 160 877 836 882 866 758<br />
Maplewood 122 367 420 405 428 453<br />
Mathews 123 411 391 410 392 400<br />
McBee 165 740 806 757 760 747<br />
Menchaca 147 631 698 675 698 713<br />
Metz 124 544 491 503 521 529<br />
Mills 181 1,058 1,097 932 912 882<br />
Norman 150 382 314 326 335 307<br />
Oak Hill 148 951 993 757 758 763<br />
Oak Springs 125 319 303 284 291 300<br />
Odom 156 712 688 663 678 678<br />
Ortega 126 257 284 295 285 399<br />
Overton 189 652 716 655 780 709<br />
Palm 171 666 661 603 555 543<br />
Patton 143 732 765 922 996 997<br />
Pease 128 254 251 257 256 270<br />
Pecan Springs 129 505 523 541 463 461<br />
Perez 190 700 800 881 904 950<br />
Pickle 164 715 722 734 757 760<br />
Pillow 151 568 648 657 672 688<br />
Pleasant Hill 130 629 623 618 610 623<br />
Read Pre-K 131 556 481 510 471 479<br />
Reilly 132 274 304 302 324 418<br />
Ridgetop 133 196 188 220 292 315<br />
Rodriguez 174 977 955 922 944 824<br />
Sanchez 127 608 617 597 587 287<br />
Sims 139 401 314 275 310 571<br />
St. Elmo 136 357 347 304 287 291<br />
Summitt 138 702 747 850 751 781<br />
Sunset Valley 158 443 464 444 499 505<br />
Travis Heights 140 564 525 540 540 549<br />
Uphaus 177 - - - - 240<br />
Walnut Creek 141 764 901 928 930 948<br />
Widen 175 822 804 782 747 739<br />
Williams 166 691 668 634 618 606<br />
Winn 157 425 440 480 394 384<br />
Wooldridge 152 839 881 878 909 914<br />
Wooten 144 675 682 703 674 675<br />
Zavala 145 435 388 410 418 411<br />
Zilker 146 497 520 523 530 548<br />
Elementary School Total 46,787 47,821 48,751 49,374 49,269<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 379
Table 95 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Enrollment Five Year History by Campus<br />
Campus Name/Number<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY 2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Projected<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
Special Schools<br />
ACES- Alternative Center for Elementary 115 22 19 20 - -<br />
ALC-Alternative Learning Center 012 209 181 198 159 159<br />
Leadership Academy 035 56 54 64 39 39<br />
Phoenix Academy 032 37 31 30 31 31<br />
Travis County Day School 027 16 15 16 24 24<br />
Travis County J J A E P 036 19 15 17 7 7<br />
Travis County Juvenile Detention Center 030 83 63 50 23 23<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> State Hospital 250 21 15 16 21 21<br />
Garza Independence 015 245 234 226 181 287<br />
Rosedale 251 120 146 150 287 181<br />
Virtual School Pilot - - - 17 17<br />
Special School Total 828 773 787 789 789<br />
All School Totals<br />
High Schools 19,986 20,069 20,178 20,651 20,984<br />
Middle Schools 15,432 15,582 15,557 15,910 16,294<br />
Elementary Schools 46,787 47,821 48,751 49,374 49,269<br />
Special Schools 828 773 787 789 789<br />
Grand Totals 83,033 84,245 85,273 86,724 87,336<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 380
Table 96<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
District Fact Sheet<br />
Actual Actual Actual Adopted Adopted<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Enrollment 83,033 84,245 85,273 86,929 87,336<br />
ADA 75,607 76,727 77,982 78,189 81,210<br />
WADA 99,654 101,464 103,314 97,353 105,842<br />
% Economically Disadvantaged 63% 64% 64% 63% 63%<br />
CAD Net Taxable Value (1) 56,266,583,957 58,749,409,539 56,280,681,272 56,875,444,136 59,110,581,643<br />
per Enrollee 677,641 697,364 660,006 654,275 676,818<br />
per ADA 744,203 765,697 721,714 727,410 727,873<br />
per WADA 564,622 579,017 544,754 584,219 558,479<br />
CPTD Assigned Value (2) 53,030,915,597 58,956,096,148 59,809,375,140 59,878,940,779 59,894,061,109<br />
Local Revenue - General Fund 640,980,065 664,832,840 653,112,865 638,484,837 677,368,777<br />
per Enrollee 7,720 7,892 7,659 7,345 7,756<br />
per ADA 8,478 8,665 8,375 8,166 8,341<br />
per WADA 6,432 6,552 6,322 6,558 6,400<br />
Recapture - General Fund 177,664,513 111,937,679 123,774,675 135,176,524 111,739,859<br />
per Enrollee 2,140 1,329 1,452 1,555 1,279<br />
per ADA 2,350 1,459 1,587 1,729 1,376<br />
per WADA 1,783 1,103 1,198 1,389 1,056<br />
State Entitlement - General Fund 216,153,230 126,019,476 162,678,023 170,302,248 110,259,107<br />
per Enrollee 2,603 1,496 1,908 1,959 1,262<br />
per ADA 2,859 1,642 2,086 2,178 1,358<br />
per WADA 2,169 1,242 1,575 1,749 1,042<br />
Operating Expenditures (3) - All Funds 794,979,625 809,502,593 809,502,593 730,229,712 711,436,572<br />
per Enrollee 9,574 9,609 9,493 8,400 8,146<br />
per ADA 10,515 10,550 10,381 9,339 8,760<br />
per WADA 7,977 7,978 7,835 7,501 6,722<br />
Debt Service Expenditures 70,042,139 80,202,659 88,634,106 95,920,379 102,744,114<br />
per Enrollee 844 952 1,039 1,103 1,176<br />
per ADA 926 1,045 1,137 1,227 1,265<br />
per WADA 703 790 858 985 971<br />
Operating Tax Rate 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079 1.079<br />
Debt Service Tax Rate 0.120 0.123 0.148 0.016 0.016<br />
Total Tax Rate 1.202 1.202 1.227 1.242 1.242<br />
Tax Yield per penny (TEA Summary of Finance)<br />
Total Tax Yield per Penny 5,829,050 6,080,567 5,944,725 5,943,161 5,873,390<br />
per Enrollee 70.20 72.18 69.71 68.37 67.25<br />
per ADA 77.10 79.25 76.23 76.01 72.32<br />
per WADA 58.49 59.93 57.54 61.05 55.49<br />
Pupil/Teacher Ratio 14.10 14.10 13.99 15.21 14.62<br />
Pupil/Staff Ratio 7.33 7.28 7.26 7.80 7.60<br />
General Fund Balance 146,235,297 172,135,104 218,665,742 248,072,693 220,095,782<br />
Governmental Funds Balance 180,169,409 202,291,083 249,470,708 277,672,346 248,650,357<br />
Notes:<br />
(1) Certified Net Taxable Value provided by the Travis County Appraisal District annually on July 25th<br />
(2) Value assigned by the Comptroller's Property Tax Division and listed on TEA Summary of Finance<br />
(3) Operating Expenditures exclude the following expenditures:<br />
*Object 6500 Debt Service and Object 6600 Capital Outlay - Land Buildings, and Equipment, Function 61 Community Services,<br />
*Functions 71 Debt Service, 81 Facilities Acquisition & Construction, 91 Contracted Instructional Services between Public Schools (Recapture),<br />
*Functions 93 Payments for Shared Services, and 99 Other Intergovernmental Charges<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 381
Staffing<br />
As with most school districts anywhere in Texas, the annual operating budget is labor intensive with<br />
approximately 87% of its budget going toward salary and benefits. To control the cost of operations,<br />
school district must control labor costs.<br />
The district must balance efficiency with effectiveness. The larger the staffing ratio is, the greater the<br />
overall efficiency will be. The district’s administration must continually evaluate staffing issues during the<br />
budgeting process. Each year staffing changes are made to more effectively operate the district.<br />
Preliminary teacher staffing formulas for <strong>FY2013</strong> will remain unchanged from the FY2012 school year.<br />
Elementary class size caps will remain as follows: PK (20:1), K-4 (22:1), and 5-6 (30:1). Secondary class<br />
sizes are targeted at an approximate level of 29 per class, based on teaching a 6 out of 8 schedule.<br />
Student enrollment gradually grew over the last 5 years with an average rate of 1.22% each year. During<br />
the same period of time the total staff grew by 0.73%.<br />
Teachers<br />
(Include regular Elementary and Secondary, and Special<br />
Program Teachers)<br />
Table 97<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Staffing History<br />
FY2008<br />
Actual<br />
FY2009<br />
Actual<br />
FY2010<br />
Actual<br />
FY2011<br />
Actual<br />
FY2012<br />
Projected<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Projected<br />
5,835 5,889 5,976 6,094 5,714 5,974<br />
Professional<br />
(Include Superintendent, Area Chiefs, Assistant<br />
Superintendents, Director, Principals, Assistant Principals,<br />
Counselors, Librarians, and Nurses)<br />
Other<br />
(Include Educational Aides and Non Classroom<br />
Paraprofessional, Bus Drivers, Hourly Employees, and Other)<br />
1,385 1,459 1,503 1,516 1,489 1,482<br />
3,880 3,974 4,092 4,128 3,948 4,032<br />
Total 11,100 11,322 11,571 11,738 11,151 11,488<br />
Student Enrollment 82,181 83,033 84,245 85,273 86,724 87,336<br />
Staffing Ratios<br />
Student/Teacher Ratio 14.08 14.10 14.10 13.99 15.18 14.62<br />
Student/Total Staff Ratio 7.40 7.33 7.28 7.26 7.78 7.60<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 382
Table 98<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Teacher by Highest Degree Held<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Compared to State for FY2011 (Latest Data Available)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Bachelors<br />
74.09%<br />
Masters<br />
24.74%<br />
Doctorate<br />
0.71%<br />
No Degree<br />
0.46%<br />
State of Texas<br />
Masters<br />
21.84%<br />
Bachelors<br />
76.85%<br />
Doctorate<br />
0.54%<br />
No Degree<br />
0.77%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 383
Table 99<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Teacher by Years of Experience<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Compared to State for FY2011 (Latest Data Available)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
11-20 Years<br />
23.47%<br />
20+ Years<br />
18.06%<br />
6-10 Years<br />
19.97%<br />
0 Years<br />
5.55%<br />
1-5 Years<br />
32.95%<br />
State of Texas<br />
11-20 Years<br />
24.98%<br />
20+ Years<br />
17.92%<br />
6-10 Years<br />
21.07%<br />
0 Years<br />
6.05%<br />
1-5 Years<br />
29.98%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 384
Future Year <strong>Budget</strong> Projections<br />
Assumptions:<br />
1. The Foundation School Program (FSP) entitles A<strong>ISD</strong> and all school districts in Texas to provide<br />
basic education for each student. The 82 nd Texas Legislature applied funding cuts in SB1 to<br />
address state budget shortfalls; subsequently, <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> lost a total of $96.6 million this fiscal<br />
biennium. It is anticipated that the 2013 legislative session will enact more changes in state<br />
funding formulas, which may impact the district’s FSP for the next biennium, FY2014 and<br />
FY2015. But, it is difficult to speculate future state cuts and apply in forecast models.<br />
2. The district shall maintain an unassigned Fund Balance sufficiently adequate for fiscal cash<br />
liquidity purposes (i.e., fiscal reserve) that will provide for sufficient cash flow to minimize the<br />
potential of short-term tax anticipation borrowing. This amount shall be equal to but not less than<br />
14% of the combined budgeted expenditures of the district General Fund.<br />
3. The <strong>FY2013</strong> and future year M&O tax rate<br />
projections are based on the current adopted<br />
rate of $1.079 per $100 of assessed taxable<br />
value. If voters approved an increase to the M&O<br />
tax rate in a tax ratification election, projected<br />
revenues for future years would increase.<br />
4. In <strong>FY2013</strong>, the revenue per WADA used to<br />
calculate the district's entitlement funding was<br />
significantly reduced from a FY2012 rate of<br />
$6,101 per WADA to $5,633 in <strong>FY2013</strong>.<br />
5. Salary increases are included in <strong>FY2013</strong>, but no<br />
additional salary projections are included in<br />
future years.<br />
The Goddess of Liberty pictured right,<br />
stands atop the rotunda of the Texas<br />
State Capitol building.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 385
Table 100<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Projection of Revenue, Expenditures and Fund Balance for General Fund<br />
General Fund<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014 FY2015 FY2016<br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Projected Projected Projected<br />
Enrollment 84,245 85,273 86,724 87,336 88,978 90,186 91,777<br />
Enrollment-Revised 86,732 86,904 87,078 87,252<br />
Average Daily Attendance (ADA) 76,726 77,981 78,945 80,327 79,618 79,777 79,937<br />
Weighted Average Daily Attendance (WADA) 101,464 103,314 98,901 103,758 103,921 104,129 104,337<br />
Hold Harmless Revenue per WADA 6,101 6,103 6,101 5,633 5,634 5,634 5,634<br />
Comptroller's Property Tax Division Value (CPTD) 58,956,096,148 61,899,156,368 59,878,940,779 60,654,383,629 63,438,664,301 64,707,437,587 64,707,437,587<br />
Estimated Value for Tax Levy Purposes $ 58,749,409,539 $ 56,280,681,272 $ 56,875,444,136 $59,110,581,643 $61,002,210,620 $62,330,254,832 $63,687,184,480<br />
Wealth Per WADA at Compressed Rate $ 476,500 $ 476,500 $ 476,500 $ 476,500 $ 476,500 $ 476,500 $ 476,500<br />
Wealth Per WADA Above Compressed Rate plus 6 cents $ 319,500 $ 319,500 $ 319,500 $ 319,500 $ 319,500 $ 319,500 $ 319,500<br />
M & O Tax Rate per $100 Taxable Value 1.0790 1.0790 1.0790 1.0790 1.0790 1.0790 1.0790<br />
Revenue<br />
Property Tax Revenue $ 652,782,885 $ 637,062,884 $ 627,260,426 $ 663,763,869 $ 683,970,439 $ 698,156,740 $ 713,355,612<br />
Prior Year Tax Revenue $ 3,339,283 $ 4,308,521 $ 3,200,000 $ 4,436,915 $ 4,436,915 $ 4,436,915 $ 4,436,915<br />
Penalty and Interests $ 3,335,172 $ 3,296,161 $ 3,100,000 $ 3,394,387 $ 3,394,387 $ 3,394,387 $ 3,394,387<br />
Interest Income $ 554,266 $ 692,699 $ 600,000 $ 401,630 $ 401,630 $ 407,654 $ 407,654<br />
Other Local Revenue $ 4,821,234 $ 7,752,600 $ 4,324,411 $ 5,371,976 $ 5,290,047 $ 5,358,442 $ 5,358,442<br />
Foundation School Fund $ 89,130,638 $ 109,384,215 $ 121,088,928 $ 33,053,978 $ 65,163,780 $ 64,608,230 $ 64,728,205<br />
Available School Fund $ 9,075,326 $ 25,432,653 $ 19,081,728 $ 47,073,537 $ 19,664,116 $ 19,703,465 $ 19,703,465<br />
Other State Revenue $ 391,613 $ 412,215 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000<br />
TRS On Behalf Payment $ 27,421,899 $ 27,448,940 $ 30,031,592 $ 30,031,592 $ 30,031,592 $ 30,031,592 $ 30,031,592<br />
State Stabilization Funding $ 22,187,440 $ 24,280,941 $ - $ - $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
School Health and Related $ 13,551,585 $ 15,596,596 $ 13,500,000 $ 18,023,989 $ 18,023,989 $ 18,023,989 $ 18,023,989<br />
Education Jobs Grant $ - $ - $ 13,798,672 $ - $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Other Federal Revenue $ 2,480,830 $ 2,554,754 $ 1,787,000 $ 2,362,595 $ 2,362,595 $ 2,362,595 $ 2,362,595<br />
Total Revenue $ 829,072,171 $ 858,223,179 $ 837,872,757 $ 808,014,468 $ 832,839,490 $ 846,584,009 $ 861,902,856<br />
Projected Expenditures $ 803,260,046 $ 811,699,171 $ 838,500,731 $ 835,961,379 $ 872,995,292 $ 891,160,010 $ 908,534,259<br />
Net Other Sources (Uses) $ 87,675 $ 6,638 $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ (30,000) $ (30,000)<br />
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance $ 25,899,800 $ 46,530,646 $ (657,974) $ (27,976,911) $ (40,185,802) $ (44,606,001) $ (46,661,403)<br />
Estimated Outstanding Purchase Orders at Year End $ 30,064,925<br />
Beginning Fund Balance $ 146,235,297 $ 172,135,096 $ 218,665,742 * $ 248,072,693 $ 220,095,782 $ 179,909,980 $ 135,303,979<br />
Ending Fund Balance $ 172,135,096 $ 218,665,742 $ 248,072,693 $ 220,095,782 $ 179,909,980 $ 135,303,979 $ 88,642,576<br />
Less Assigned Fund Balance $ (23,808,573) $ (39,038,247) $ (48,983,942) $ (35,530,274) $ (33,060,330) $ (36,266,644)<br />
Ending Fund Balance - Unassigned $ 148,326,523 $ 179,627,495 $ 199,088,751 $ 184,565,508 $ 146,849,650 $ 99,037,335 $ 88,642,576<br />
Ending Fund Balance as % of Total <strong>Budget</strong> Expenditures 21.43% 26.94% 29.59% 26.33% 20.61% 15.18% 9.76%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 386
Table 101<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Projection of Revenue, Expenditures and Fund Balance for Debt Service and Food Service Funds<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014 FY2015 FY2016<br />
Debt Service Fund<br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Projected Projected Projected<br />
I & S Tax Rate per $100 Taxable Value 0.1230 0.1480 0.1630 0.1630 0.1630 0.1630 0.1630<br />
Revenue<br />
Taxes - Current and Prior Years $ 74,389,079 $ 87,334,669 $ 94,505,938 $ 100,272,021 $ 103,324,543 $ 105,467,608 $ 106,983,597<br />
Taxes - Prior Years $ 372,885 $ 486,876 $ 325,000 $ 425,000 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 $ 325,000<br />
Penalty & Interest $ 377,582 $ 412,842 $ 330,000 $ 400,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000 $ 330,000<br />
Interest Earnings $ 284,511 $ 307,657 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000<br />
Building America Bond Subsidy $ - $ 886,020 $ - $ 984,466 $ 984,466 $ 984,466 $ 984,466<br />
Total Revenue $ 75,424,057 $ 89,428,064 $ 95,360,938 $ 102,281,487 $ 105,164,009 $ 107,307,074 $ 108,823,063<br />
Projected Debt Service Expenditures $ 80,202,659 $ 88,634,106 $ 95,920,379 $ 102,744,114 $ 101,381,083 $ 104,454,820 $ 105,611,496<br />
Net Other Sources (Uses) $ 112,393 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $<br />
-<br />
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance $ (4,666,209) $ 793,958 $ (559,441) $ (462,627) $ 3,782,926 $ 2,852,254 $ 3,211,567<br />
Beginning Fund Balance $ 25,271,334 $ 20,605,125 $ 21,399,083 $ 20,839,642 $ 20,377,015 $ 24,159,941 $ 27,012,195<br />
Ending Fund Balance $ 20,605,125 $ 21,399,083 $ 20,839,642 $ 20,377,015 $ 24,159,941 $ 27,012,195 $ 30,223,762<br />
Ending Fund Balance as % of Total <strong>Budget</strong> 25.69% 24.14% 21.73% 19.83% 23.83% 25.86% 28.62%<br />
Food Service Fund<br />
Revenue<br />
2009-10 2010-11 FY2012 <strong>FY2013</strong> FY2014 2014-15 2014-15<br />
Actual Actual Adopted Adopted Projected Projected Projected<br />
Local Sources $ 7,827,956 $ 7,624,437 $ 8,226,536 $ 8,392,715 $ 8,560,569 $ 8,731,781 $ 8,906,416<br />
State Sources $ 1,063,672 $ 1,125,924 $ 1,146,327 $ 1,146,327 $ 1,146,327 $ 1,146,327 $ 1,146,327<br />
Federal Sources $ 28,338,890 $ 29,610,386 $ 29,831,027 $ 30,675,778 $ 31,534,700 $ 32,417,671 $ 33,325,366<br />
Total Revenue $ 37,230,518 $ 38,360,747 $ 39,203,890 $ 40,214,820 $ 41,241,596 $ 42,295,779 $ 43,378,109<br />
Projected Food Service Expenditures $ 36,342,434 $ 38,505,721 $ 39,849,762 $ 40,797,276 $ 41,776,411 $ 42,779,044 $ 43,805,742<br />
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance $ 888,084 $ (144,974) $ (645,872) $ (582,456) $ (534,815) $ (483,265) $ (427,632)<br />
Beginning Fund Balance $ 8,662,778 $ 9,550,862 $ 9,405,888 $ 8,760,016 $ 8,177,560 $ 7,642,745 $ 7,159,480<br />
Ending Fund Balance $ 9,550,862 $ 9,405,888 $ 8,760,016 $ 8,177,560 $ 7,642,745 $ 7,159,480 $ 6,731,848<br />
Ending Fund Balance as % of Total <strong>Budget</strong> 26.28% 24.43% 21.98% 20.04% 18.29% 16.74% 15.37%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 387
Buildings and Square Footage<br />
Table 102<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Schedule of Buildings and Square Footage<br />
Initial Year<br />
of Service<br />
Building<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Number of<br />
Portables<br />
Portable<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Totals<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Building<br />
High Schools<br />
017 Akins 2000 349,843 23 35,328 385,171<br />
009 Anderson 1973 321,412 1 1,536 322,948<br />
028 Ann Richards SWYL 1958 123,796 3 4,608 128,404<br />
002 <strong>Austin</strong> 1975 330,759 5 7,680 338,439<br />
013 Bowie 1988 440,578 13 19,968 460,546<br />
008 Crockett 1968 345,799 8 12,288 358,087<br />
019 Eastside Memorial 1960 253,815 2 3,072 256,887<br />
029 International 1960 25,000 0 0 25,000<br />
004 Lanier/Lanier Pathways 1966 280,242 13 19,968 300,210<br />
014 LASA / LBJ Comprehensive 1974 293,046 9 13,824 306,870<br />
005 McCallum 1953 251,287 5 7,680 258,967<br />
006 Reagan 1965 274,018 2 3,072 277,090<br />
007 Travis/Travis Pathways 1953 277,906 4 5,376 283,282<br />
High School Totals 3,567,501 88 134,400 3,701,901<br />
Middle Schools<br />
59 Bailey 1993 147,444 7 10,752 158,196<br />
54 Bedichek 1972 140,875 17 26,112 166,987<br />
46 Burnet 1961 139,248 12 18,432 157,680<br />
57 Covington 1986 172,364 3 4,608 176,972<br />
55 Dobie 1972 133,675 3 4,608 138,283<br />
43 Fulmore 1911 156,804 4 6,144 162,948<br />
56 Garcia 2007 161,147 0 0 161,147<br />
62 Gorzycki 2009 169,045 0 0 169,045<br />
44 Kealing 1986 196,674 0 0 196,674<br />
45 Lamar 1955 130,714 3 4,608 135,322<br />
51 Martin 1967 113,766 7 10,752 124,518<br />
58 Mendez 1987 173,382 9 13,824 187,206<br />
52 Murchison 1967 135,534 11 16,896 152,430<br />
47 O.Henry 1953 141,413 5 7,680 149,093<br />
61 Paredes 1999 143,037 4 6,144 149,181<br />
48 Pearce 1958 132,596 1 1,536 134,132<br />
60 Small 1999 160,608 3 4,608 165,216<br />
53 Webb 1968 120,985 6 9,216 130,201<br />
Middle School Totals 2,669,312 95 145,920 2,815,232<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 388
Table 102 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Schedule of Buildings and Square Footage<br />
Initial Year<br />
of Service<br />
Building<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Number of<br />
Portables<br />
Portable<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Totals<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Building<br />
Elementary Schools<br />
101 Allison 1955 61,426 5 7,680 69,106<br />
102 Andrews 1962 60,032 9 13,824 73,856<br />
187 Baldwin 2010 86,896 0 0 86,896<br />
182 Baranoff 1999 80,088 4 6,144 86,232<br />
149 Barrington 1969 75,385 14 21,504 96,889<br />
103 Barton Hills 1964 38,290 7 10,752 49,042<br />
104 Becker 1936 61,528 2 3,072 64,600<br />
105 Blackshear 1903 70,071 0 0 70,071<br />
106 Blanton 1964 71,609 6 9,216 80,825<br />
185 Blazier 2007 82,897 7 10,752 93,649<br />
170 Boone 1986 72,858 0 0 72,858<br />
107 Brentwood 1951 62,890 2 3,072 65,962<br />
108 Brooke 1954 51,588 3 3,840 55,428<br />
109 Brown 1957 54,822 6 9,216 64,038<br />
110 BrykerWoods 1939 37,499 6 8,448 45,947<br />
111 Campbell 1992 61,322 1 1,536 62,858<br />
173 Casey 1999 81,506 1 1,536 83,042<br />
112 Casis 1951 77,061 9 13,824 90,885<br />
184 Clayton 2006 99,883 4 6,144 106,027<br />
161 Cook 1974 67,355 11 16,896 84,251<br />
183 Cowan 2000 70,234 6 9,216 79,450<br />
113 Cunningham 1962 71,191 4 6,144 77,335<br />
179 Davis 1992 71,734 3 4,608 76,342<br />
114 Dawson 1954 59,904 4 5,376 65,280<br />
154 Doss 1970 60,521 8 12,288 72,809<br />
176 Galindo 1988 85,513 6 8,448 93,961<br />
116 Govalle 1940 75,468 0 0 75,468<br />
159 Graham 1972 72,031 7 10,752 82,783<br />
117 Gullett 1956 39,826 8 11,520 51,346<br />
118 Harris 1955 55,794 7 10,752 66,546<br />
163 Hart 1998 81,042 9 13,824 94,866<br />
119 Highland Park 1952 58,557 6 9,216 67,773<br />
155 Hill 1970 69,626 6 9,216 78,842<br />
162 Houston 1976 80,229 10 15,360 95,589<br />
142 IDEA at Allan K-5 1957 111,937 0 0 111,937<br />
178 Jordan 1992 73,898 8 12,288 86,186<br />
120 Joslin 1954 44,829 5 7,680 52,509<br />
180 Kiker 1992 74,156 10 15,360 89,516<br />
172 Kocurek 1986 76,346 1 1,536 77,882<br />
168 Langford 1980 77,748 11 16,896 94,644<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 389
Table 102 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Schedule of Buildings and Square Footage<br />
Initial Year<br />
of Service<br />
Building<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Number of<br />
Portables<br />
Portable<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Totals<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Building<br />
Elementary Schools, continued<br />
121 Lee 1940 47,226 1 768 47,994<br />
160 Linder 1972 69,544 11 16,896 86,440<br />
122 Maplewood 1951 45,389 6 9,216 54,605<br />
123 Mathews 1916 42,124 3 3,840 45,964<br />
165 McBee 2000 69,716 6 9,216 78,932<br />
147 Menchaca 1975 60,005 6 9,216 69,221<br />
124 Metz 1992 61,356 2 3,072 64,428<br />
181 Mills 1998 81,368 8 12,288 93,656<br />
150 Norman 1970 58,519 1 1,536 60,055<br />
148 Oak Hill 1974 75,143 7 10,752 85,895<br />
125 Oak Springs 1958 47,102 3 4,608 51,710<br />
156 Odom 1970 61,009 9 13,824 74,833<br />
126 Ortega 1959 47,301 2 3,072 50,373<br />
189 Overton 2007 88,013 7 10,752 98,765<br />
171 Palm 1986 78,101 2 3,072 81,173<br />
143 Patton 1985 76,213 8 12,288 88,501<br />
128 Pease 1876 35,623 0 0 35,623<br />
129 Pecan Springs 1957 59,810 4 6,144 65,954<br />
190 Perez 2006 82,223 10 15,360 97,583<br />
164 Pickle 2001 116,427 4 6,144 122,571<br />
151 Pillow 1969 54,247 7 10,752 64,999<br />
130 Pleasant Hill 1986 65,298 5 7,680 72,978<br />
131 Read Pre-k 1962 37,188 6 9,216 46,404<br />
132 Reilly 1954 41,646 4 6,144 47,790<br />
133 Ridgetop 1939 34,617 3 4,608 39,225<br />
174 Rodriguez 1999 79,918 10 15,360 95,278<br />
127 St. Elmo 1960 78,951 4 6,144 85,095<br />
139 Sanchez 1976 44,337 3 4,608 48,945<br />
136 Sims 1956 48,922 2 3,072 51,994<br />
138 Summitt 1986 75,903 8 12,288 88,191<br />
158 Sunset Valley 1971 66,467 1 1,536 68,003<br />
140 Travis Heights 1939 59,330 3 4,608 63,938<br />
177 Uphaus ECC 2012 72,000 0 0 72,000<br />
141 Walnut Creek 1961 79,535 11 16,896 96,431<br />
175 Widen 1986 74,523 9 13,824 88,347<br />
166 Williams 1976 64,436 6 9,216 73,652<br />
157 Winn 1970 60,758 2 3,072 63,830<br />
152 Wooldridge 1969 70,474 13 19,968 90,442<br />
144 Wooten 1955 53,689 12 18,432 72,121<br />
145 Zavala 1936 69,142 0 0 69,142<br />
146 Zilker 1950 53,656 7 10,752 64,408<br />
Elementary School Totals 5,352,838 429 658,176 6,011,014<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 390
Table 102 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Schedule of Buildings and Square Footage<br />
Initial Year<br />
of Service<br />
Building<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Number of<br />
Portables<br />
Portable<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Totals<br />
Square<br />
Footage<br />
Building<br />
Special Schools<br />
ALC 1952 86,585 6 9,216 95,801<br />
Garza High 1939 44,754 4 6,144 50,898<br />
Rosedale 1939 36,772 5 7,680 44,452<br />
Special School Totals 168,111 15 23,040 191,151<br />
Other Buildings<br />
Carruth Admin. Building 1984 133,321 0 0 133,321<br />
Baker 1911 65,868 0 0 65,868<br />
Burger Field 1975 177,340 0 0 177,340<br />
Clifton 1977 37,537 1 1,536 39,073<br />
Delco Activity Center 2003 60,294 0 0 60,294<br />
House Park 1937 31,864 0 0 31,864<br />
Nelson Field 1964 59,005 1 1,536 60,541<br />
Pleasant Hill Annex 1947 25,758 0 0 25,758<br />
Saegert 1977 18,003 1 1,536 19,539<br />
Service Center 1992 52,953 0 0 52,953<br />
Warehouse 1984 115,757 0 0 115,757<br />
Other Building Totals 777,700 3 4,608 782,308<br />
Grand Totals<br />
High Schools 3,567,501 6 9,216 130,201<br />
Middle Schools 2,669,312 95 145,920 2,815,232<br />
Elementary Schools 5,352,838 429 658,176 6,011,014<br />
Special Schools 168,111 15 23,040 191,151<br />
Other Buildings 777,700 3 4,608 782,308<br />
Grand Totals 12,535,461 548 840,960 9,929,905<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 391
Benchmarks<br />
Each year, as the district staff prepares the annual<br />
budget, various comparisons are made between<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and local peer group districts, urban peer<br />
group districts, the TX Comptroller FAST peer groups<br />
and/or with the state at large to validate how the<br />
district’s resources are used. These comparisons are<br />
called benchmarks.<br />
The benchmarks also help to put into perspective<br />
information that people hear through the media.<br />
Hopefully, the reader of these tables, charts and<br />
graphs will be enlightened about how <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
manages its resources.<br />
The following pages compare FY2011<br />
Academic Excellence Indicator System<br />
(AEIS) data between <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and the<br />
local peer group districts, urban peer group<br />
districts, FAST peer districts and the state<br />
as a whole. This is the latest information<br />
available on the Texas Education Agency<br />
website. The data has been condensed to<br />
percentages, per student costs and ratios to<br />
enable the reader to digest key elements of<br />
school district spending.<br />
Blackshear Elementary Students<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 392
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Comparison with Local Peer Group Districts<br />
The following pages compare FY2011 Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) data between<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and the local peer group districts including Del Valle, Eanes, Georgetown, Hays Consolidated,<br />
Lake Travis, Leander, Manor, Pflugerville and Round Rock. This is the latest data available at the time of<br />
print. It is anticipated the FY2012 AEIS reports will be released in late fall 2012 or early winter 2013.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and Surrounding School Districts<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 393
Student Group<br />
Table 103<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Local Peer Group Comparison of Student Groups<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> DEL VALLE <strong>ISD</strong> EANES <strong>ISD</strong> GEORGETOWN<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HAYS C<strong>ISD</strong><br />
LAKE TRAVIS<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
LEANDER <strong>ISD</strong> MANOR <strong>ISD</strong> PFLUGERVILLE<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
ROUND ROCK<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Students # 85,273 10,673 7,691 10,411 15,262 6,940 32,034 7,173 22,657 44,590<br />
Bilingual # of students 23,740 3,330 166 1,112 2,095 380 1,570 2,260 3,964 3,632<br />
Bilingual % of students 27.84% 31.20% 2.16% 10.68% 13.73% 5.48% 4.90% 31.51% 17.50% 8.15%<br />
Bilingual Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.02 2.24 0.15 0.67 0.95 0.41 0.38 2.36 1.51 0.65<br />
CATE # of students 17,265 2,035 1,144 2,143 2,843 1,351 4,079 1,738 4,413 11,594<br />
CATE % of students 20.25% 19.07% 14.87% 20.58% 18.63% 19.47% 12.73% 24.23% 19.48% 26.00%<br />
CATE Students to Total Staff Ratio 1.47 1.37 1.04 1.28 1.29 1.45 0.98 1.81 1.68 2.07<br />
Economically Disadvantaged # of students 54,550 9,271 206 4,780 7,465 1,015 7,220 5,696 11,656 13,339<br />
Economically Disadvantaged % of students 63.97% 86.86% 2.68% 45.91% 48.91% 14.63% 22.54% 79.41% 51.45% 29.91%<br />
Economically Disadvantaged Students to Total Staff Ratio 4.65 6.23 0.19 2.86 3.38 1.09 1.74 5.94 4.44 2.38<br />
Gifted & Talented # of students 5,385 359 976 920 1,296 851 4,620 476 1,863 3,618<br />
Gifted & Talented % of students 6.32% 3.36% 12.69% 8.84% 8.49% 12.26% 14.42% 6.64% 8.22% 8.11%<br />
Gifted & Talented Students to Total Staff Ratio 0.46 0.24 0.89 0.55 0.59 0.91 1.11 0.50 0.71 0.64<br />
LEP # of students 24,435 3,420 187 1,222 2,178 390 1,582 2,267 4,056 3,615<br />
LEP % of students 28.66% 32.04% 2.43% 11.74% 14.27% 5.62% 4.94% 31.60% 17.90% 8.11%<br />
LEP Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.08 2.30 0.17 0.73 0.98 0.42 0.38 2.36 1.55 0.64<br />
Special Education # of students 8,164 1,047 571 843 1,349 465 2,956 565 2,107 3,326<br />
Special Education % of students 9.57% 9.81% 7.42% 8.10% 8.84% 6.70% 9.23% 7.88% 9.30% 7.46%<br />
Special Education Students to Total Staff Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.51 0.61 0.50 0.71 0.59 0.80 0.59<br />
Total Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $9,493 $8,704 $9,554 $9,284 $8,220 $8,594 $8,168 $8,315 $7,930 $7,995<br />
Non Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $3,638 $3,958 $9,381 $2,526 $1,800 $7,403 $3,772 $1,059 $1,829 $4,392<br />
Total Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $13,131 $12,662 $18,935 $11,809 $10,020 $15,997 $11,940 $9,374 $9,759 $12,387<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 394
Staff<br />
Table 104<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 General Fund Local Peer Group Comparison of Staffing<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> DEL VALLE <strong>ISD</strong> EANES <strong>ISD</strong> GEORGETOWN<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HAYS C<strong>ISD</strong> LAKE TRAVIS <strong>ISD</strong> LEANDER <strong>ISD</strong> MANOR <strong>ISD</strong> PFLUGERVILLE<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
ROUND ROCK <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Staff Tot FTE # 11,735.83 1,489.13 1,097.03 1,668.77 2,211.67 932.57 4,158.92 959.10 2,623.95 5,612.30<br />
Aux Tot FTE # 3,277.53 406.75 280.21 475.70 728.37 268.88 935.59 133.63 368.61 1,272.91<br />
Aux Tot FTE Pct 27.93% 27.32% 25.54% 28.51% 32.93% 28.83% 22.50% 13.93% 14.05% 22.68%<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE # 72.47 7.00 10.50 19.00 35.99 14.00 47.50 14.00 36.00 43.97<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE Pct 0.62% 0.47% 0.96% 1.14% 1.63% 1.50% 1.14% 1.46% 1.37% 0.78%<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE # 849.95 103.27 91.92 165.68 136.07 94.68 329.40 83.36 318.71 558.55<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE Pct 7.24% 6.93% 8.38% 9.93% 6.15% 10.15% 7.92% 8.69% 12.15% 9.95%<br />
School Admin Tot FTE # 461.50 52.44 21.26 40.89 53.64 14.61 97.35 53.33 105.29 138.00<br />
School Admin Tot FTE Pct 3.93% 3.52% 1.94% 2.45% 2.43% 1.57% 2.34% 5.56% 4.01% 2.46%<br />
Tchr Tot FTE # 6,093.62 762.65 574.33 826.15 1,042.96 474.45 2,206.39 494.09 1,502.23 3,043.93<br />
Tchr Tot FTE Pct 51.92% 51.21% 52.35% 49.51% 47.16% 50.88% 53.05% 51.52% 57.25% 54.24%<br />
Support Tot FTE # 980.77 157.01 118.81 141.35 214.63 65.95 542.68 180.70 293.11 554.94<br />
Support Tot FTE Pct 8.36% 10.54% 10.83% 8.47% 9.70% 7.07% 13.05% 18.84% 11.17% 9.89%<br />
Students to Teacher Ratio 13.99 13.99 13.39 12.60 14.63 14.63 14.52 14.52 15.08 14.65<br />
Students to Total Staff Ratio 7.27 7.17 7.01 6.24 6.90 7.44 7.70 7.48 8.63 7.95<br />
Teacher Total Base Salary Average $ 46,606 $ 47,487 $ 50,620 $ 48,246 $ 43,803 $ 48,684 $ 48,497 $ 45,563 $ 46,908 $ 48,903<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 395
Table 105<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Local Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Program Intent Code – All Funds<br />
Program Intent Code<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> DEL VALLE <strong>ISD</strong> EANES <strong>ISD</strong> GEORGETOWN<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HAYS C<strong>ISD</strong> LAKE TRAVIS <strong>ISD</strong> LEANDER <strong>ISD</strong> MANOR <strong>ISD</strong> PFLUGERVILLE<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
ROUND ROCK <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Program Intent Code Total $ $809,496,199 $92,899,889 $73,478,005 $96,653,142 $125,456,292 $59,644,671 $261,664,319 $59,642,922 $179,681,327 $356,484,653<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-$ $239,140,100 $37,603,688 $33,304,625 $42,865,780 $60,618,462 $29,592,792 $126,842,631 $24,784,803 $75,888,407 $167,043,608<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-% 29.54% 40.48% 45.33% 44.35% 48.32% 49.62% 48.48% 41.56% 42.23% 46.86%<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-$ $2,800,757 $141,194 $673,286 $1,234,876 $484,849 $1,061,838 $2,448,381 $242,622 $637,463 $4,453,652<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-% 0.35% 0.15% 0.92% 1.28% 0.39% 1.78% 0.94% 0.41% 0.35% 1.25%<br />
22 Career and Technical-$ $12,234,438 $1,579,840 $926,056 $2,389,017 $2,728,501 $1,126,171 $5,253,376 $1,462,351 $3,876,860 $8,081,119<br />
22 Career and Technical-% 1.51% 1.70% 1.26% 2.47% 2.17% 1.89% 2.01% 2.45% 2.16% 2.27%<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-$ $129,604,588 $11,203,493 $14,229,724 $12,672,688 $13,787,035 $7,279,265 $40,027,801 $6,137,691 $29,937,043 $49,534,383<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-% 16.01% 12.06% 19.37% 13.11% 10.99% 12.20% 15.30% 10.29% 16.66% 13.90%<br />
24 Accelerated Education-$ $85,181,181 $10,869,233 $494,350 $468,731 $7,531,362 $1,124,354 $6,675,549 $4,317,762 $8,252,292 $8,492,514<br />
24 Accelerated Education-% 10.52% 11.70% 0.67% 0.48% 6.00% 1.89% 2.55% 7.24% 4.59% 2.38%<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-$ $108,889,516 $4,724,950 $411,341 $4,416,474 $1,286,993 $1,070,942 $6,363,251 $1,032,171 $3,497,171 $9,830,814<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-% 13.45% 5.09% 0.56% 4.57% 1.03% 1.80% 2.43% 1.73% 1.95% 2.76%<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-$ $2,805,536 $0 $318,915 $515,013 $678,538 $0 $15,399 $503,397 $432,377 $1,780,655<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-% 0.35% 0.00% 0.43% 0.53% 0.54% 0.00% 0.01% 0.84% 0.24% 0.50%<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-$ $3,427,162 $0 $3,955 $462,960 $420,770 $42,711 $843,405 $348,144 $843,265 $2,858,712<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-% 0.42% 0.00% 0.01% 0.48% 0.34% 0.07% 0.32% 0.58% 0.47% 0.80%<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-$ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,056 $151,438 $454,916 $32,696<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.25% 0.25% 0.01%<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-$ $26,999,875 $2,138,115 $0 $4,717,559 $0 $0 $0 $2,458,527 $2,443,035 $7,746,043<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-% 3.34% 2.30% 0.00% 4.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.12% 1.36% 2.17%<br />
31 High School Allotment Program-$ $4,081,554 $414,302 $35,299 $769,633 $1,144,833 $650,766 $2,452,158 $155,105 $1,855,630 $3,689,294<br />
32 High School Allotment Program-% 0.50% 0.45% 0.05% 0.80% 0.91% 1.09% 0.94% 0.26% 1.03% 1.03%<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-$ $11,477,819 $961,427 $1,658,812 $1,282,168 $1,766,812 $1,774,865 $5,329,773 $743,351 $3,241,920 $5,646,137<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-% 1.42% 1.03% 2.26% 1.33% 1.41% 2.98% 2.04% 1.25% 1.80% 1.58%<br />
99 Undistributed-$ $182,853,673 $23,263,647 $21,421,642 $24,858,243 $35,008,137 $15,920,967 $65,309,539 $17,305,560 $48,320,948 $87,295,026<br />
99 Undistributed-% 22.59% 25.04% 29.15% 25.72% 27.90% 26.69% 24.96% 29.02% 26.89% 24.49%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 396
Function<br />
Table 106<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Local Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> DEL VALLE <strong>ISD</strong> EANES <strong>ISD</strong> GEORGETOWN<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HAYS C<strong>ISD</strong> LAKE TRAVIS <strong>ISD</strong> LEANDER <strong>ISD</strong> MANOR <strong>ISD</strong> PFLUGERVILLE<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
ROUND ROCK <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Function Total $ $809,496,199 92,899,889 $73,478,005 $96,653,142 $125,456,292 $59,644,671 $261,664,319 $59,642,922 $179,681,327 $356,484,653<br />
11 Instruction-$ $458,494,939 $54,037,407 $42,595,481 $56,425,770 $71,775,104 $35,505,602 $150,598,362 $34,400,169 $104,350,836 $205,333,357<br />
11 Instruction-% 56.64% 58.17% 57.97% 58.38% 57.21% 59.53% 57.55% 57.68% 58.08% 57.60%<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-$ $13,127,763 $1,356,610 $1,108,137 $1,029,313 $2,106,746 $599,585 $4,301,448 $583,145 $2,870,773 $6,154,732<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-% 1.62% 1.46% 1.51% 1.06% 1.68% 1.01% 1.64% 0.98% 1.60% 1.73%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-$ $28,861,167 $1,299,949 $1,556,539 $433,513 $1,394,177 $598,985 $8,226,360 $1,348,773 $6,095,883 $14,561,895<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-% 3.57% 1.40% 2.12% 0.45% 1.11% 1.00% 3.14% 2.26% 3.39% 4.08%<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-$ $14,654,439 $1,087,909 $1,068,374 $2,786,141 $1,791,942 $387,382 $1,946,081 $1,339,314 $2,424,524 $3,663,119<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-% 1.81% 1.17% 1.45% 2.88% 1.43% 0.65% 0.74% 2.25% 1.35% 1.03%<br />
23 School Leandership-$ $50,207,567 $6,217,299 $3,168,892 $5,705,625 $6,524,057 $2,427,227 $13,034,855 $2,999,032 $9,941,106 $18,786,577<br />
23 School Leandership-% 6.20% 6.69% 4.31% 5.90% 5.20% 4.07% 4.98% 5.03% 5.53% 5.27%<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-$ $26,167,517 $3,034,024 $2,807,639 $3,125,837 $4,147,704 $1,996,712 $10,533,448 $1,511,649 $6,373,213 $12,648,288<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-% 3.23% 3.27% 3.82% 3.23% 3.31% 3.35% 4.03% 2.53% 3.55% 3.55%<br />
32 Social Work Services-$ $5,759,903 $568,113 $337,502 $372,022 $271,097 $0 $414,614 $458,371 $473,529 $800,931<br />
32 Social Work Services-% 0.71% 0.61% 0.46% 0.38% 0.22% 0.00% 0.16% 0.77% 0.26% 0.22%<br />
33 Health Services-$ $6,576,528 $914,253 $585,996 $1,198,629 $1,527,152 $471,799 $1,802,147 $673,112 $1,832,541 $3,504,701<br />
33 Health Services-% 0.81% 0.98% 0.80% 1.24% 1.22% 0.79% 0.69% 1.13% 1.02% 0.98%<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-$ $26,584,483 $4,171,668 $1,772,478 $3,879,257 $7,138,934 $2,153,524 $7,761,812 $2,972,735 $7,421,508 $10,922,653<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-% 3.28% 4.49% 2.41% 4.01% 5.69% 3.61% 2.97% 4.98% 4.13% 3.06%<br />
35 Food Services-$ $37,117,351 $6,829,346 $3,433,015 $5,078,425 $6,620,780 $2,951,261 $13,098,234 $3,922,458 $10,533,512 $16,492,843<br />
35 Food Services-% 4.59% 7.35% 4.67% 5.25% 5.28% 4.95% 5.01% 6.58% 5.86% 4.63%<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-$ $14,672,286 $2,186,665 $2,302,317 $1,922,605 $2,707,274 $2,354,213 $8,940,158 $989,050 $5,705,912 $8,842,551<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-% 1.81% 2.35% 3.13% 1.99% 2.16% 3.95% 3.42% 1.66% 3.18% 2.48%<br />
41 General Administration-$ $16,783,309 $2,687,158 $2,467,385 $3,027,116 $2,933,495 $2,237,037 $4,809,883 $1,450,436 $3,758,393 $7,330,749<br />
41 General Administration-% 2.07% 2.89% 3.36% 3.13% 2.34% 3.75% 1.84% 2.43% 2.09% 2.06%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 397
Function<br />
Table 106 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Local Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> DEL VALLE <strong>ISD</strong> EANES <strong>ISD</strong> GEORGETOWN<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HAYS C<strong>ISD</strong> LAKE TRAVIS <strong>ISD</strong> LEANDER <strong>ISD</strong> MANOR <strong>ISD</strong> PFLUGERVILLE<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
ROUND ROCK <strong>ISD</strong><br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-$ $80,370,032 $7,143,538 $8,202,510 $10,015,057 $13,224,312 $6,371,127 $27,550,447 $5,469,044 $12,737,807 $38,444,024<br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-% 9.93% 7.69% 11.16% 10.36% 10.54% 10.68% 10.53% 9.17% 7.09% 10.78%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-$ $9,070,352 $737,185 $366,571 $79,382 $995,737 $205,303 $1,182,843 $383,033 $2,179,198 $2,433,795<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-% 1.12% 0.79% 0.50% 0.08% 0.79% 0.34% 0.45% 0.64% 1.21% 0.68%<br />
53 Data Processing Services-$ $21,048,563 $628,765 $1,699,560 $1,311,899 $2,297,781 $1,145,161 $7,232,545 $1,122,693 $2,966,950 $6,117,467<br />
53 Data Processing Services-% 2.60% 0.68% 2.31% 1.36% 1.83% 1.92% 2.76% 1.88% 1.65% 1.72%<br />
92 Incremental Costs-$ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $231,537 $0 $0 $0 $0<br />
92 Incremental Costs-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.39% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-$ $0 $0 $5,609 $262,551 $0 $8,216 $231,082 $19,908 $15,642 $446,971<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% 0.27% 0.00% 0.01% 0.09% 0.03% 0.01% 0.13%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 398
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Comparison<br />
with Urban Peer Group Districts<br />
The following pages compare FY2011 Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) data between<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and the urban peer group districts including Aldine, Arlington, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston,<br />
North East, Northside and San Antonio.<br />
Congress Avenue Bridge, City of <strong>Austin</strong><br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 399
Student Group<br />
Table 107<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Student Groups<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> ALDINE <strong>ISD</strong> ARLINGTON<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
DALLAS <strong>ISD</strong><br />
FORT WORTH<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HOUSTON <strong>ISD</strong><br />
NORTH EAST<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
NORTHSIDE<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
SAN ANTONIO<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Students # 85,273 62,945 64,380 156,784 81,511 203,294 66,364 94,632 54,894<br />
Bilingual # of students 23,740 18,874 14,675 55,144 21,926 56,728 5,879 6,456 8,866<br />
Bilingual % of students 27.84% 29.98% 22.79% 35.17% 26.90% 27.90% 8.86% 6.82% 16.15%<br />
Bilingual Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.02 2.26 1.79 2.83 2.16 2.32 0.69 0.51 1.16<br />
CATE # of students 17,265 13,479 13,443 32,033 14,556 31,845 10,173 17,438 10,983<br />
CATE % of students 20.25% 21.41% 20.88% 20.43% 17.86% 15.66% 15.33% 18.43% 20.01%<br />
CATE Students to Total Staff Ratio 1.47 1.61 1.64 1.65 1.44 1.30 1.19 1.37 1.44<br />
Economically Disadvantaged # of students 54,550 53,139 40,599 136,501 61,642 163,905 28,869 49,675 50,944<br />
Economically Disadvantaged % of students 63.97% 84.42% 63.06% 87.06% 75.62% 80.62% 43.50% 52.49% 92.80%<br />
Economically Disadvantaged Students to Total Staff Ratio 4.65 6.36 4.97 7.01 6.09 6.71 3.37 3.89 6.68<br />
Gifted & Talented # of students 5,385 2,695 11,904 18,646 6,576 29,000 4,659 9,539 3,062<br />
Gifted & Talented % of students 6.32% 4.28% 18.49% 11.89% 8.07% 14.27% 7.02% 10.08% 5.58%<br />
Gifted & Talented Students to Total Staff Ratio 0.46 0.32 1.46 0.96 0.65 1.19 0.54 0.75 0.40<br />
LEP # of students 24,435 20,019 14,995 59,225 23,094 61,946 5,632 7,081 10,116<br />
LEP % of students 28.66% 31.80% 23.29% 37.77% 28.33% 30.47% 8.49% 7.48% 18.43%<br />
LEP Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.08 2.40 1.83 3.04 2.28 2.53 0.66 0.55 1.33<br />
Special Education # of students 8,164 4,325 5,160 12,083 5,910 16,019 6,320 11,074 5,642<br />
Special Education % of students 9.57% 6.87% 8.01% 7.71% 7.25% 7.88% 9.52% 11.70% 10.28%<br />
Special Education Students to Total Staff Ratio 0.70 0.52 0.63 0.62 0.58 0.66 0.74 0.87 0.74<br />
Total Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $9,493 $8,557 $8,273 $9,673 $9,210 $9,064 $8,421 $8,182 $9,159<br />
Non Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $3,638 $1,767 $1,419 $3,780 $3,948 $2,860 $2,665 $2,556 $1,577<br />
Total Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $13,131 $10,324 $9,692 $13,452 $13,158 $11,924 $11,086 $10,737 $10,736<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 400
Staff<br />
Table 108<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Staffing<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> ALDINE <strong>ISD</strong> ARLINGTON <strong>ISD</strong> DALLAS <strong>ISD</strong> FORT WORTH <strong>ISD</strong> HOUSTON <strong>ISD</strong> NORTH EAST <strong>ISD</strong> NORTHSIDE <strong>ISD</strong> SAN ANTONIO <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Staff Tot FTE # 11,735.83 8,357.91 8,176.37 19,461.07 10,129.03 24,440.42 8,557.50 12,774.60 7,630.95<br />
Aux Tot FTE # 3,277.53 2,406.25 1,967.39 4,114.50 2,469.56 7,528.98 2,394.58 3,911.28 2,240.29<br />
Aux Tot FTE Pct 27.93% 28.79% 24.06% 21.14% 24.38% 30.81% 27.98% 30.62% 29.36%<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE # 72.47 83.50 54.00 193.53 94.00 90.00 8.00 40.00 69.00<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE Pct 0.62% 1.00% 0.66% 0.99% 0.93% 0.37% 0.09% 0.31% 0.90%<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE # 849.95 838.50 987.97 1,742.22 834.64 1,492.32 698.45 1,026.06 898.71<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE Pct 7.24% 10.03% 12.08% 8.95% 8.24% 6.11% 8.16% 8.03% 11.78%<br />
School Admin Tot FTE # 461.50 226.44 202.76 488.85 403.67 545.16 193.88 271.26 177.89<br />
School Admin Tot FTE Pct 3.93% 2.71% 2.48% 2.51% 3.99% 2.23% 2.27% 2.12% 2.33%<br />
Tchr Tot FTE # 6,093.62 3,963.00 4,148.29 10,665.16 5,131.82 11,811.46 4,376.69 6,116.92 3,436.77<br />
Tchr Tot FTE Pct 51.92% 47.42% 50.74% 54.80% 50.66% 48.33% 51.14% 47.88% 45.04%<br />
Support Tot FTE # 980.77 840.22 815.96 2,256.81 1,195.33 2,972.51 885.89 1,409.08 808.29<br />
Support Tot FTE Pct 8.36% 10.05% 9.98% 11.60% 11.80% 12.16% 10.35% 11.03% 10.59%<br />
Students to Teacher Ratio 13.99 15.88 15.52 14.70 15.88 17.21 15.16 15.47 15.97<br />
Students to Total Staff Ratio 7.27 7.53 7.87 8.06 8.05 8.32 7.76 7.41 7.19<br />
Teacher Total Base Salary Average $ 46,606 $ 51,561 $ 52,236 $ 55,022 $ 53,550 $ 52,417 $ 52,897 $ 52,425 $ 49,904<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 401
Table 109<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Program Intent Code – All Funds<br />
Program Intent Code<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> ALDINE <strong>ISD</strong> ARLINGTON <strong>ISD</strong> DALLAS <strong>ISD</strong> FORT WORTH <strong>ISD</strong> HOUSTON <strong>ISD</strong> NORTH EAST <strong>ISD</strong> NORTHSIDE <strong>ISD</strong> SAN ANTONIO <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Program Intent Code Total $ $809,496,199 $538,625,579 $532,602,587 $1,516,555,758 $750,678,522 $1,842,670,604 $558,864,450 $774,242,593 $502,757,747<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-$ $239,140,100 $184,921,749 $249,467,682 $663,680,349 $334,954,782 $738,936,825 $279,082,785 $381,887,628 $179,869,189<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-% 29.54% 34.33% 46.84% 43.76% 44.62% 40.10% 49.94% 49.32% 35.78%<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-$ $2,800,757 $202,243 $12,561,791 $17,119,284 $14,207,493 $9,070,456 $5,516,398 $8,566,157 $1,575,568<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-% 0.35% 0.04% 2.36% 1.13% 1.89% 0.49% 0.99% 1.11% 0.31%<br />
22 Career and Technical-$ $12,234,438 $13,798,596 $10,588,929 $31,113,360 $16,622,630 $33,489,934 $11,978,408 $15,401,935 $10,699,203<br />
22 Career and Technical-% 1.51% 2.56% 1.99% 2.05% 2.21% 1.82% 2.14% 1.99% 2.13%<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-$ $129,604,588 $69,775,089 $60,959,734 $137,302,331 $72,514,177 $190,395,963 $92,230,099 $125,892,566 $71,663,591<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-% 16.01% 12.95% 11.45% 9.05% 9.66% 10.33% 16.50% 16.26% 14.25%<br />
24 Accelerated Education-$ $85,181,181 $12,297,673 $30,347,286 $111,527,342 $101,931,588 $16,872,167 $8,881,450 $19,925,249 $33,551,651<br />
24 Accelerated Education-% 10.52% 2.28% 5.70% 7.35% 13.58% 0.92% 1.59% 2.57% 6.67%<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-$ $108,889,516 $67,537,941 $20,126,865 $34,622,335 $39,632,878 $161,080,529 $6,276,011 $2,738,795 $29,791,097<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-% 13.45% 12.54% 3.78% 2.28% 5.28% 8.74% 1.12% 0.35% 5.93%<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-$ $2,805,536 $0 $5,105,377 $5,708,794 $4,060,664 $462 $1,383,564 $1,263,886 $4,351,446<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-% 0.35% 0.00% 0.96% 0.38% 0.54% 0.00% 0.25% 0.16% 0.87%<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-$ $3,427,162 $3,230,125 $4,164,331 $6,514,705 $2,517,432 $14,011,904 $2,671,603 $2,559,507 $2,816,081<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-% 0.42% 0.60% 0.78% 0.43% 0.34% 0.76% 0.48% 0.33% 0.56%<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-$ $0 $906,978 $473,959 $0 $1,017,319 $925,085 $440,696 $1,775,985 $0<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-% 0.00% 0.17% 0.09% 0.00% 0.14% 0.05% 0.08% 0.23% 0.00%<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-$ $26,999,875 $53,116,867 $5,045,085 $126,862,446 $1,130 $224,758,140 $23,343,498 $23,809,771 $48,066,148<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-% 3.34% 9.86% 0.95% 8.37% 0.00% 12.20% 4.18% 3.08% 9.56%<br />
31 High School Allotment Program-$ $4,081,554 $3,794,701 $4,976,193 $9,404,846 $4,816,589 $0 $5,042,358 $6,430,524 $3,284,533<br />
32 High School Allotment Program-% 0.50% 0.70% 0.93% 0.62% 0.64% 0.00% 0.90% 0.83% 0.65%<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-$ $11,477,819 $2,013,291 $6,905,311 $11,457,400 $8,250,085 $11,108,069 $6,676,260 $11,721,433 $5,160,078<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-% 1.42% 0.37% 1.30% 0.76% 1.10% 0.60% 1.19% 1.51% 1.03%<br />
99 Undistributed-$ $182,853,673 $127,030,326 $121,880,044 $361,242,566 $150,151,755 $442,021,070 $115,341,320 $172,269,157 $111,929,162<br />
99 Undistributed-% 22.59% 23.58% 22.88% 23.82% 20.00% 23.99% 20.64% 22.25% 22.26%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 402
Function<br />
Table 110<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> ALDINE <strong>ISD</strong> ARLINGTON <strong>ISD</strong> DALLAS <strong>ISD</strong> FORT WORTH<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HOUSTON <strong>ISD</strong><br />
NORTH EAST<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
NORTHSIDE <strong>ISD</strong><br />
SAN ANTONIO<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Function Total $ $809,496,199 $538,625,579 $532,602,587 $1,516,555,758 $750,678,522 $1,842,670,604 $558,864,450 $774,242,593 $502,757,747<br />
11 Instruction-$ $458,494,939 $330,778,839 $335,592,681 $878,194,985 $425,658,374 $1,099,829,918 $336,824,146 $471,238,856 $285,127,365<br />
11 Instruction-% 56.64% 61.41% 63.01% 57.91% 56.70% 59.69% 60.27% 60.86% 56.71%<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-$ $13,127,763 $7,237,303 $6,621,287 $23,921,854 $11,219,242 $15,408,902 $9,192,640 $12,468,812 $7,935,046<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-% 1.62% 1.34% 1.24% 1.58% 1.49% 0.84% 1.64% 1.61% 1.58%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-$ $28,861,167 $4,924,183 $10,075,629 $44,762,446 $32,790,843 $59,152,446 $17,023,216 $19,243,759 $18,589,608<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-% 3.57% 0.91% 1.89% 2.95% 4.37% 3.21% 3.05% 2.49% 3.70%<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-$ $14,654,439 $7,832,324 $7,086,081 $28,489,950 $12,924,852 $24,589,652 $6,928,461 $16,586,979 $10,712,331<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-% 1.81% 1.45% 1.33% 1.88% 1.72% 1.33% 1.24% 2.14% 2.13%<br />
23 School Leandership-$ $50,207,567 $29,135,474 $25,630,088 $80,601,646 $44,209,366 $128,474,634 $30,842,095 $40,512,736 $28,989,586<br />
23 School Leandership-% 6.20% 5.41% 4.81% 5.31% 5.89% 6.97% 5.52% 5.23% 5.77%<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-$ $26,167,517 $21,629,819 $21,652,261 $62,452,012 $33,622,529 $57,677,988 $18,996,739 $27,620,188 $17,720,698<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-% 3.23% 4.02% 4.07% 4.12% 4.48% 3.13% 3.40% 3.57% 3.52%<br />
32 Social Work Services-$ $5,759,903 $1,753,744 $2,245,520 $2,833,522 $4,330,192 $2,192,063 $4,202,493 $2,650,836 $3,809,229<br />
32 Social Work Services-% 0.71% 0.33% 0.42% 0.19% 0.58% 0.12% 0.75% 0.34% 0.76%<br />
33 Health Services-$ $6,576,528 $4,980,879 $4,956,327 $17,716,700 $7,476,070 $21,412,801 $7,431,655 $7,109,024 $7,321,870<br />
33 Health Services-% 0.81% 0.92% 0.93% 1.17% 1.00% 1.16% 1.33% 0.92% 1.46%<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-$ $26,584,483 $28,990,253 $10,601,233 $24,352,368 $19,124,542 $46,148,429 $17,331,546 $27,235,393 $9,757,486<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-% 3.28% 5.38% 1.99% 1.61% 2.55% 2.50% 3.10% 3.52% 1.94%<br />
35 Food Services-$ $37,117,351 $33,834,186 $26,156,902 $79,338,344 $36,427,507 $109,172,263 $26,963,424 $40,775,710 $32,509,338<br />
35 Food Services-% 4.59% 6.28% 4.91% 5.23% 4.85% 5.92% 4.82% 5.27% 6.47%<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-$ $14,672,286 $5,625,202 $9,048,149 $18,257,388 $9,474,777 $20,292,193 $9,292,768 $18,115,749 $9,422,087<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-% 1.81% 1.04% 1.70% 1.20% 1.26% 1.10% 1.66% 2.34% 1.87%<br />
41 General Administration-$ $16,783,309 $10,109,636 $6,654,256 $52,618,787 $15,993,998 $34,653,585 $10,672,410 $11,009,717 $12,257,687<br />
41 General Administration-% 2.07% 1.88% 1.25% 3.47% 2.13% 1.88% 1.91% 1.42% 2.44%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 403
Function<br />
Table 110 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Urban Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
AUSTIN <strong>ISD</strong> ALDINE <strong>ISD</strong> ARLINGTON <strong>ISD</strong> DALLAS <strong>ISD</strong> FORT WORTH<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
HOUSTON <strong>ISD</strong><br />
NORTH EAST<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
NORTHSIDE <strong>ISD</strong><br />
SAN ANTONIO<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-$ $80,370,032 $40,066,284 $53,497,500 $150,003,031 $76,552,385 $177,521,530 $52,562,616 $63,305,857 $45,943,516<br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-% 9.93% 7.44% 10.04% 9.89% 10.20% 9.63% 9.41% 8.18% 9.14%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-$ $9,070,352 $3,657,489 $4,645,002 $20,873,749 $10,879,876 $19,963,797 $4,627,130 $6,067,173 $5,482,526<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-% 1.12% 0.68% 0.87% 1.38% 1.45% 1.08% 0.83% 0.78% 1.09%<br />
53 Data Processing Services-$ $21,048,563 $8,069,964 $7,789,046 $31,429,782 $9,798,719 $26,180,403 $5,796,778 $10,092,867 $7,151,253<br />
53 Data Processing Services-% 2.60% 1.50% 1.46% 2.07% 1.31% 1.42% 1.04% 1.30% 1.42%<br />
92 Incremental Costs-$ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0<br />
92 Incremental Costs-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-$ $0 $0 $350,625 $709,194 $195,250 $0 $176,333 $208,937 $28,121<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.07% 0.05% 0.03% 0.00% 0.03% 0.03% 0.01%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 404
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Comparison with State of Texas<br />
The following pages compare FY2011 Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) data between<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> and the State as a whole.<br />
State of Texas School District Regions<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 405
Table 111<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Benchmark Data Comparison to State<br />
FY2010 Data as Reported on the 2010-11 TEA AEIS Report<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> State <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> State<br />
Total Students 85,273 4,912,385<br />
Total Staff 11,735.8 663,146.4 100.00% 100.00%<br />
Professional<br />
Teachers 6,093.6 334,876.4 51.92% 50.50%<br />
Professional Support 980.8 59,958.9 8.36% 9.04%<br />
Campus Administration 461.5 18,757.3 3.93% 2.83%<br />
Central Administration 72.5 6,820.1 0.62% 1.03%<br />
Total Professional 7,608.4 420,412.7 64.83% 63.40%<br />
Educational Aides 849.9 62,981.3 7.24% 9.50%<br />
Auxiliary 3,277.5 179,752.4 27.93% 27.11%<br />
Ratios<br />
Student to Teacher 13.99 14.67<br />
Student to Total Staff 7.27 7.41<br />
Teacher to Campus Administration 13.20 17.85<br />
Teacher to Central Administration 84.05 49.10<br />
Teacher to Professional Support 6.21 5.59<br />
Teachers to Aides 7.17 5.32<br />
Teacher to Total Staff 0.52 0.50<br />
All Funds Expenditure (by function)<br />
Actual Expenditure Information (FY11)<br />
Per Student<br />
Total Operating Expenditures<br />
Instruction (11,95) $ 5,430.00 $ 5,142.00 $ 457,482,789 $ 24,805,113,325<br />
Instructional-Related Services (12,13) $ 503.00 $ 315.00 $ 42,360,904 $ 1,520,261,151<br />
Instructional Leadership (21) $ 198.00 $ 131.00 $ 16,673,114 $ 633,472,153<br />
School Leadership (23) $ 587.00 $ 487.00 $ 49,438,207 $ 2,350,497,427<br />
Support Services-Student (31,32,33) $ 455.00 $ 421.00 $ 38,361,214 $ 2,031,024,489<br />
Student Transportation (34) $ 307.00 $ 240.00 $ 25,838,894 $ 1,156,289,200<br />
Food Services (35) $ 425.00 $ 461.00 $ 35,769,570 $ 2,223,522,112<br />
Cocurricular Activities (36) $ 174.00 $ 231.00 $ 14,623,673 $ 1,115,331,069<br />
Central Administration (41,92) $ 206.00 $ 269.00 $ 17,352,912 $ 1,299,666,358<br />
Plant Maintenance and Operations (51) $ 982.00 $ 913.00 $ 82,730,588 $ 4,405,080,294<br />
Security and Monitoring Services (52) $ 114.00 $ 68.00 $ 9,577,365 $ 327,376,988<br />
Data Processing Services (53) $ 234.00 $ 123.00 $ 19,686,249 $ 593,331,074<br />
Total Operating Expenditures $ 9,614.00 $ 8,802.00 809,895,479 42,460,965,640<br />
Instructional Expenditure Ratio (11,12,13,31) 63.70% 65.30%<br />
Source: 2010-11 TEA Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 406
Table 112<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Comparison to State Staffing for FY2011<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Staffing<br />
Professional<br />
Support<br />
8.36%<br />
Auxiliary Staff<br />
27.93%<br />
Teachers<br />
51.92%<br />
Educational Aides<br />
7.24%<br />
Other<br />
4.56%<br />
Central<br />
Administration<br />
0.62%<br />
Campus<br />
Administration<br />
3.94%<br />
Teachers Professional Support Auxiliary Staff<br />
Educational Aides Central Administration Campus Administration<br />
State Staffing<br />
Professional<br />
Support<br />
9.04%<br />
Auxiliary Staff<br />
27.11%<br />
Teachers<br />
50.50%<br />
Educational Aides<br />
9.50%<br />
Other<br />
3.86%<br />
Central<br />
Administration<br />
1.03%<br />
Campus<br />
Administration<br />
2.83%<br />
Teachers Professional Support Auxiliary Staff<br />
Educational Aides Central Administration Campus Administration<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 407
Table 113<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Student Ratio Comparison for FY2011<br />
16.00<br />
13.99<br />
14.67<br />
12.00<br />
8.00<br />
7.26 7.41<br />
4.00<br />
-<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Student to Teacher<br />
State<br />
Student to Total Staff<br />
Table 114<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Teacher Ratio Comparison for FY2011<br />
90.00<br />
84.06<br />
80.00<br />
70.00<br />
60.00<br />
50.00<br />
40.00<br />
30.00<br />
20.00<br />
10.00<br />
-<br />
49.10<br />
Teacher to Central<br />
Administration<br />
17.85<br />
13.20<br />
Teacher to<br />
Campus<br />
Administration<br />
6.21<br />
5.59<br />
Teacher to<br />
Professional<br />
Support Staff<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
State<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 408
Table 115<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Total Operating Expenditures per Student<br />
All Funds - <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
School Leadership<br />
6.20%<br />
Support Services -<br />
Students 4.76%<br />
Instruction 61.83%<br />
Student<br />
Tranportation<br />
3.28%<br />
Other 9.42%<br />
Food Services<br />
4.43%<br />
Plant Maintenance<br />
and Operations<br />
9.93%<br />
Instructional<br />
Leadership 2.22%<br />
Cocurricular<br />
Activities 1.89%<br />
Central<br />
Administration<br />
2.21%<br />
Security and Monitoring<br />
Services 1.21%<br />
Data Processing<br />
Services 2.53%<br />
Table 116<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 Total Operating Expenditures per Student<br />
All Funds - State of Texas<br />
Support Services -<br />
Students 5.62%<br />
School Leadership<br />
1.42%<br />
Student<br />
Tranportation 4.77%<br />
Food Services 2.85%<br />
Plant Maintenance<br />
and Operations<br />
5.45%<br />
Instructional<br />
Leadership 2.78%<br />
Cocurricular<br />
Activities 2.87%<br />
Instruction 61.87%<br />
Other 18.03%<br />
Central<br />
Administration<br />
10.15%<br />
Security and Monitoring<br />
Services 2.45%<br />
Data Processing<br />
Services 1.43%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 409
Table 117<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Instruction Percentage Comparison for FY2011<br />
All Funds: <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> comparison to the State of Texas<br />
70.00%<br />
60.00%<br />
61.83%<br />
61.82%<br />
50.00%<br />
44.79%<br />
47.01%<br />
40.00%<br />
30.00%<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
State<br />
20.00%<br />
10.00%<br />
0.00%<br />
Instruction as % of Operating &<br />
Non-Operating Expenditures<br />
Instruction as % of Operating<br />
Expenditures<br />
In the above presentation, instruction expenditures include the following functional expenditures:<br />
11- Instruction<br />
12- Instructional Resources and Media Services<br />
13- Curriculum Development and Instructional Staff Development<br />
31- Guidance, Counseling and Evaluation Services<br />
32- Social Work Services<br />
33- Health Services<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 410
Financial Allocation Study for Texas (FAST)<br />
The Financial Allocation Study of Texas (FAST) measures how spending in every Texas public school<br />
district and campus translates to student academic progress. Updated data for the third year of FAST<br />
ratings was released in September 2012. The Comptroller’s FAST study also identifies and shares costeffective<br />
practices that could benefit campuses and districts across the state.<br />
The Comptroller’s research team evaluated academic performance and financial data to identify school<br />
districts and campuses that produce high academic achievement while maintaining cost-effective<br />
operations. The research team evaluated financial data for each district and campus by comparing them<br />
to “fiscal peers” – districts and campuses that operate in similar cost environments, are of similar size and<br />
serve similar students. Fiscal Peers are defined as a cost comparison group consisting of up to 40<br />
districts (or campuses) most fiscally similar to each district (or campus). Cost factors to determine fiscal<br />
peers include size, location, cost-adjusted wages and student characteristics. Each district (or campus)<br />
can have a unique fiscal peer group, though due to similarities, many groups overlap.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 411
Table 118<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2012 FAST District Ratings with Fiscal Peers<br />
2010-11 TEA<br />
Accountability<br />
Rating<br />
Math<br />
progress<br />
percentile<br />
3-year avg<br />
Reading<br />
progress<br />
percentile<br />
3-year avg<br />
Composite<br />
Progress<br />
Percentile<br />
3-year avg +<br />
Spending<br />
Index = *Fast Rating<br />
Peer Districts Type of Peer County Enrollment<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Travis 85,273 AA* 72 68 73 + Very High = 2.5<br />
Aldine <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Harris 62,945 AA* 86 54 75 + Low = 4.0<br />
Alief <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Harris 45,657 Recognized 79 96 95 + Low = 4.5<br />
Arlington <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Tarrant 64,380 AA* 31 42 36 + Average = 2.5<br />
Brownsville <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Cameron 49,800 AA* 82 73 81 + High = 3.5<br />
Conroe <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Montgomery 50,849 Recognized 81 78 84 + Very Low = 5.0<br />
Cypress-Fairbanks <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Harris 105,860 Recognized 77 86 87 + Very Low = 5.0<br />
Dallas <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Dallas 156,784 AA* 48 31 39 + High = 2.0<br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer El Paso 64,023 Recognized 86 63 78 + Very High = 2.5<br />
Fort Bend <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Fort Bend 68,710 AA* 85 85 90 + Very Low = 5.0<br />
Fort Worth <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Tarrant 81,511 AA* 39 29 34 + High = 2.0<br />
Garland <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Dallas 57,614 AA* 60 84 77 + Very Low = 4.5<br />
Houston <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Harris 203,294 AA* 83 65 77 + High = 3.0<br />
Katy <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Harris 60,573 Recognized 85 81 89 + Low = 4.5<br />
Klein <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Harris 45,092 Recognized 71 74 75 + Very Low = 4.5<br />
Lewisville <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Denton 51,298 Recognized 90 93 95 + Average = 4.0<br />
North East <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Bexar 66,364 Recognized 70 82 81 + High = 3.5<br />
Northside <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Bexar 94,632 Recognized 71 91 88 + Average = 4.0<br />
Pasadena <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Harris 52,010 Recognized 56 53 57 + Low = 3.5<br />
Plano <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer Collin 55,294 Recognized 84 93 93 + Low = 4.5<br />
Round Rock <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Local Peer Williamson 44,590 AA* 86 85 90 + Low = 4.5<br />
San Antonio <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer & Urban Peer Bexar 54,894 AA* 16 45 27 + High = 2.0<br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong> FAST Fiscal Peer El Paso 44,468 Recognized 76 84 86 + Very High = 3.0<br />
AA* Academically Acceptable<br />
Data Source: http://www.fastexas.org/results/downloads.php<br />
Fast Components<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 412
Student Group<br />
Table 119<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Student Groups<br />
(1-7 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Alief <strong>ISD</strong> Brownsville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Conroe <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Cypress-<br />
Fairbanks<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Fort Bend<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Garland <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Students 85,273 45,657 49,800 50,849 105,860 64,023 68,710 57,614<br />
Bilingual # 23,740 16,132 15,681 5,646 16,492 14,377 8,543 11,868<br />
Bilingual % of students 27.8% 35.3% 31.5% 11.1% 15.6% 22.5% 12.4% 20.6%<br />
Bilingual Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.02 2.63 2.03 0.91 1.30 1.67 1.01 1.62<br />
CATE # 17,265 7,158 13,692 9,317 26,556 21,162 11,566 13,659<br />
CATE % of students of students 20.2% 15.7% 27.5% 18.3% 25.1% 33.1% 16.8% 23.7%<br />
CATE Students to Total Staff Ratio 1.47 1.17 1.78 1.51 2.09 2.46 1.37 1.86<br />
Economically Disadvantage # 54,550 35,956 47,499 18,710 49,261 44,863 24,577 33,992<br />
Economically Disadvantage % of students 64.0% 78.8% 95.4% 36.8% 46.5% 70.1% 35.8% 59.0%<br />
Eco. Disadvtg. Students to Total Staff Ratio 4.65 5.86 6.16 3.02 3.87 5.22 2.91 4.63<br />
Gifted & Talented # 5,385 1,755 4,188 3,550 4,434 6,477 5,083 4,002<br />
Gifted & Talented % of students 6.3% 3.8% 8.4% 7.0% 4.2% 10.1% 7.4% 6.9%<br />
Gifted & Talented Stdnts to Total Staff Ratio 0.46 0.29 0.54 0.57 0.35 0.75 0.60 0.54<br />
LEP # 24,435 16,455 16,568 6,185 17,442 17,355 9,275 12,595<br />
LEP % of students 28.7% 36.0% 33.3% 12.2% 16.5% 27.1% 13.5% 21.9%<br />
LEP Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.08 2.68 2.15 1.00 1.37 2.02 1.10 1.71<br />
Special Ed # 8,164 3,419 5,293 3,789 7,644 5,390 4,112 5,293<br />
Special Ed % of students 9.6% 7.5% 10.6% 7.5% 7.2% 8.4% 6.00% 9.2%<br />
Special Ed. to Total Staff Ratio 0.70 0.56 0.69 0.61 0.60 0.63 0.49 0.72<br />
Total Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $9,493 $9,019 $9,497 $7,349 $7,252 $8,313 $7,694 $7,934<br />
Non Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $3,638 $999 $1,466 $3,239 $2,506 $1,202 $2,115 $1,183<br />
Total Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $13,131 $10,018 $10,964 $10,588 $9,758 $9,515 $9,809 $9,117<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 413
Student Group<br />
Table 119 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Student Groups<br />
(8-13 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Katy <strong>ISD</strong> Klein <strong>ISD</strong> Lewisville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pasadena<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Plano <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Students 85,273 60,573 45,092 51,298 52,010 55,294 44,468<br />
Bilingual # 23,740 8,032 5,562 6,199 13,008 6,466 11,549<br />
Bilingual % of students 27.8% 13.3% 12.3% 12.10% 25.0% 11.7% 26.0%<br />
Bilingual Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.02 1.05 0.96 0.95 1.81 0.94 1.80<br />
CATE # 17,265 9,157 10,210 6,216 9,181 7,663 11,872<br />
CATE % of students of students 20.2% 15.10% 22.6% 12.1% 17.7% 13.9% 26.7%<br />
CATE Students to Total Staff Ratio 1.47 1.20 1.77 0.95 1.28 1.11 1.85<br />
Economically Disadvantage # 54,550 18,292 17,779 13,705 8,733 13,601 36,316<br />
Economically Disadvantage % of students 64.0% 30.2% 39.4% 26.7% 16.8% 24.6% 81.7%<br />
Eco. Disadvtg. Students to Total Staff Ratio 4.65 2.39 3.07 2.11 1.22 1.97 5.65<br />
Gifted & Talented # 5,385 3,780 2,893 4,695 2,641 8,151 3,593<br />
Gifted & Talented % of students 6.3% 6.2% 6.4% 9.2% 5.1% 14.70% 8.1%<br />
Gifted & Talented Stdnts to Total Staff Ratio 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.72 0.37 1.18 0.56<br />
LEP # 24,435 8,301 5,852 6,570 14,711 6,684 10,585<br />
LEP % of students 28.7% 13.7% 13.0% 12.8% 28.3% 12.1% 23.8%<br />
LEP Students to Total Staff Ratio 2.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 2.05 0.97 1.65<br />
Special Ed # 8,164 4,647 3,406 4,936 3,997 5,696 4,490<br />
Special Ed % of students 9.6% 7.7% 7.6% 9.6% 7.7% 10.3% 10.1%<br />
Special Ed. to Total Staff Ratio 0.70 0.61 0.59 0.76 0.56 0.83 0.70<br />
Total Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $9,493 $8,012 $7,837 $8,495 $8,638 $8,392 $9,310<br />
Non Operating Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $3,638 $3,195 $3,099 $3,369 $938 $4,773 $1,779<br />
Total Expenditures Per Student (General Fund) $13,131 $11,207 $10,936 $11,864 $9,576 $13,165 $11,089<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 414
Staff<br />
Table 120<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Staffing<br />
(1-7 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Alief <strong>ISD</strong> Brownsville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Conroe <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Cypress-<br />
Fairbanks<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Fort Bend<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Garland <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Staff Tot FTE # 11,736.00 6,138.00 7,713.00 6,186.00 12,734.00 8,592.00 8,450.00 7,346.00<br />
Aux Tot FTE # 3,278.00 1,757.00 2,536.00 1,768.00 4,687.00 2,326.00 2,551.00 2,182.00<br />
Aux Tot FTE % 27.9% 28.6% 32.9% 28.6% 36.8% 27.1% 30.2% 29.7%<br />
Support Tot FTE # 981.00 611.00 665.00 595.00 1,048.00 1,175.00 1,007.00 766.00<br />
Support Tot FTE % 8.4% 10.0% 8.6% 9.6% 8.2% 13.7% 11.9% 10.4%<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE # 72.00 58.00 9.00 32.00 69.00 22.00 31.00 60.00<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE % 0.6% 0.9% 0.1% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 0.4% 0.8%<br />
Tchr Tot FTE # 6,094.00 3,037.00 3,425.00 3,191.00 6,470.00 4,399.00 4,135.00 3,712.00<br />
Tchr Tot FTE % 51.9% 49.5% 44.4% 51.6% 50.8% 51.2% 48.9% 50.5%<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE # 850.00 517.00 875.00 434.00 26.00 446.00 534.00 432.00<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE % 7.2% 8.4% 11.3% 7.0% 0.2% 5.2% 6.3% 5.9%<br />
School Admin Tot FTE # 462.00 157.00 203.00 166.00 434.00 224.00 193.00 194.00<br />
School Admin Tot FTE % 3.9% 2.6% 2.6% 2.7% 3.4% 2.6% 2.3% 2.6%<br />
Students to Teacher Ratio 13.99 15.03 14.54 15.94 16.36 14.55 16.62 15.52<br />
Students to Total Staff Ratio 7.27 7.44 6.46 8.22 8.31 7.45 8.13 7.84<br />
Teacher Total Base Salary Average $ $46,606 $53,043 $49,629 $49,997 $50,239 $49,211 $52,651 $50,680<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 415
Staff<br />
Table 120 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Staffing<br />
(8-13 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Katy <strong>ISD</strong> Klein <strong>ISD</strong> Lewisville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pasadena<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Plano <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Staff Tot FTE # 11,736.00 7,656.00 5,783.00 6,509.00 7,177.00 6,892.00 6,429.00<br />
Aux Tot FTE # 3,278.00 2,392.00 1,822.00 1,366.00 2,106.00 1,332.00 2,097.00<br />
Aux Tot FTE % 27.9% 31.2% 31.5% 21.0% 29.4% 19.3% 32.6%<br />
Support Tot FTE # 981.00 506.00 393.00 599.00 585.00 667.00 510.00<br />
Support Tot FTE % 8.4% 6.6% 6.8% 9.2% 8.2% 9.7% 7.9%<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE # 72.00 52.00 39.00 56.00 76.00 76.00 22.00<br />
Central Admin Tot FTE % 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.9% 1.1% 1.1% 0.3%<br />
Tchr Tot FTE # 6,094.00 3,869.00 2,995.00 3,765.00 3,500.00 4,011.00 3,054.00<br />
Tchr Tot FTE % 51.9% 50.5% 51.8% 57.8% 48.8% 58.2% 47.5%<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE # 850.00 683.00 376.00 542.00 734.00 631.00 593.00<br />
Educ Aide Tot FTE % 7.2% 8.9% 6.5% 8.3% 10.2% 9.2% 9.2%<br />
School Admin Tot FTE # 462.00 155.00 158.00 182.00 175.00 175.00 154.00<br />
School Admin Tot FTE % 3.9% 2.0% 2.7% 2.8% 2.4% 2.5% 2.4%<br />
Students to Teacher Ratio 13.99 15.66 15.06 13.62 14.86 13.79 14.56<br />
Students to Total Staff Ratio 7.27 7.91 7.80 7.88 7.25 8.02 6.92<br />
Teacher Total Base Salary Average $ $46,606 $50,799 $51,967 $49,744 $49,694 $51,741 $50,144<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 416
Table 121<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Program Intent Code – All Funds<br />
(1-7 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
Program Intent Code<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Alief <strong>ISD</strong> Brownsville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Conroe <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Cypress-<br />
Fairbanks<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Fort Bend<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Garland <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Program Intent Code Total $ 809,496,199 411,780,715 472,974,975 373,711,660 767,677,091 532,228,528 528,686,518 457,084,513<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-$ 239,140,100 188,487,404 201,308,210 179,473,728 382,105,130 246,794,636 275,501,847 191,827,480<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-% 29.5% 45.8% 42.6% 48.0% 49.8% 46.4% 52.1% 42.0%<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-$ 2,800,757 1,573,526 1,116,685 1,327,775 5,799,048 7,415,380 12,092,018 5,769,564<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.7% 0.9% 1.5% 0.7%<br />
22 Career and Technical-$ 12,234,438 5,677,195 14,707,866 8,538,003 13,404,447 14,426,489 13,137,574 15,765,467<br />
22 Career and Technical-% 1.5% 1.4% 3.1% 2.3% 1.7% 2.7% 2.5% 3.4%<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-$ 129,604,588 48,472,715 56,106,434 44,720,972 82,693,733 58,469,724 61,215,738 55,736,103<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-% 16.0% 11.8% 11.9% 12.0% 10.8% 11.0% 11.6% 12.2%<br />
24 Accelerated Education-$ 85,181,181 17,591,765 46,199,961 11,331,278 36,067,264 56,896,212 8,574,095 29,900,432<br />
24 Accelerated Education-% 10.5% 4.3% 9.8% 3.0% 4.7% 10.7% 1.6% 6.5%<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-$ 108,889,516 10,514,527 5,804,156 2,602,112 45,884,692 6,664,278 7,660,709 39,363,910<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-% 13.45% 2.55% 1.23% 0.70% 5.98% 1.25% 1.45% 8.61%<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-$ 2,805,536 2,119,917 2,647,195 1,482,160 - 2,899,988 1,407,103 1,760,682<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-% 0.35% 0.51% 0.56% 0.40% 0.00% 0.54% 0.27% 0.39%<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-$ 3,427,162 5,415,279 4,035,751 870,337 1,215,026 4,138,324 2,058,911 2,248,573<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-% 0.42% 1.32% 0.85% 0.23% 0.16% 0.78% 0.39% 0.49%<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-$ - 14,765 - - 1,660,166 828,729 490,651 114<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.22% 0.16% 0.09% 0.00%<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-$ 26,999,875 20,339,118 21,197,608 31,104,619 3,831,535 19,891,389 19,996,028 3,903,344<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-% 3.34% 4.94% 4.48% 8.32% 0.50% 3.74% 3.78% 0.85%<br />
31 High School Allotment Program-$ 4,081,554 3,050,969 22,361 3,477,807 - 6,094,243 5,346,036 4,300,877<br />
32 High School Allotment Program-% 0.50% 0.74% 0.00% 0.93% 0.00% 1.15% 1.01% 0.94%<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-$ 11,477,819 2,730,101 9,409,589 6,467,494 8,480,508 8,367,836 5,494,105 4,101,595<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-% 1.42% 0.66% 1.99% 1.73% 1.10% 1.57% 1.04% 0.90%<br />
99 Undistributed-$ 182,853,673 105,793,434 110,419,159 82,315,375 186,535,542 99,341,300 115,711,703 102,406,372<br />
100 Undistributed-% 22.59% 25.69% 23.35% 22.03% 24.30% 18.67% 21.89% 22.40%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 417
Table 121 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Program Intent Code – All Funds<br />
(8-13 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
Program Intent Code<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Katy <strong>ISD</strong> Klein <strong>ISD</strong> Lewisville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pasadena<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Plano <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Program Intent Code Total $ 809,496,199 485,323,474 353,384,394 435,756,141 449,269,173 464,035,774 414,015,153<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-$ 239,140,100 258,781,430 192,189,890 230,475,949 188,507,615 233,573,420 177,376,942<br />
11 Basic Educational Services-% 29.5% 32.0% 23.7% 28.5% 23.3% 28.9% 21.9%<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-$ 2,800,757 9,916,786 1,034,477 4,960,170 10,864,247 6,670,479 979,556<br />
21 Gifted and Talented-% 0.3% 1.2% 0.1% 0.6% 1.3% 0.8% 0.1%<br />
22 Career and Technical-$ 12,234,438 9,397,731 11,622,476 10,357,844 9,967,504 8,699,936 10,716,740<br />
22 Career and Technical-% 1.5% 1.2% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 1.3%<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-$ 129,604,588 64,292,559 42,948,712 65,132,876 54,003,404 74,156,378 62,158,397<br />
23 Services to Students w/Disabilities-% 16.0% 7.9% 5.3% 8.0% 6.7% 9.2% 7.7%<br />
24 Accelerated Education-$ 85,181,181 5,729,024 6,304,977 11,238,857 52,694,615 14,043,010 31,871,116<br />
24 Accelerated Education-% 10.5% 0.7% 0.8% 1.4% 6.5% 1.7% 3.9%<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-$ 108,889,516 7,250,094 3,036,373 6,867,264 10,085,562 8,904,871 5,356,992<br />
25 Bilingual Ed. and Special Lang.-% 13.45% 0.90% 0.38% 0.85% 1.25% 1.10% 0.66%<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-$ 2,805,536 1,518,514 1,576,524 1,167,749 2,559,848 2,198,776 2,250,640<br />
26 Non-Disc. Alt. Ed-AEP Srvcs-% 0.35% 0.19% 0.19% 0.14% 0.32% 0.27% 0.28%<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-$ 3,427,162 1,766,927 1,478,830 1,756,898 5,671,864 1,999,799 2,402,973<br />
28 Disc. Alt. Ed.-DAEP Basic Serv-% 0.42% 0.22% 0.18% 0.22% 0.70% 0.25% 0.30%<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-$ - - 709,457 - - - 40,806<br />
29 Disc. Alt Ed-DAEP Supplemental-% 0.00% 0.00% 0.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.01%<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-$ 26,999,875 9,465,370 7,689,586 1,744,317 - 4,692,327 21,449,922<br />
30 T1 A Schoolwide-ST Comp ≥ 40%-% 3.34% 1.17% 0.95% 0.22% 0.00% 0.58% 2.65%<br />
31 High School Allotment Program-$ 4,081,554 4,737,330 4,037,041 3,259,666 4,938,702 7,388,362 3,459,755<br />
32 High School Allotment Program-% 0.50% 0.59% 0.50% 0.40% 0.61% 0.91% 0.43%<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-$ 11,477,819 6,907,257 4,854,698 6,554,453 3,876,455 4,526,095 6,293,068<br />
91 Athletics & Related Activity-% 1.42% 0.85% 0.60% 0.81% 0.48% 0.56% 0.78%<br />
99 Undistributed-$ 182,853,673 105,560,452 75,901,353 92,240,098 106,099,357 97,182,321 89,658,246<br />
100 Undistributed-% 22.59% 13.04% 9.38% 11.39% 13.11% 12.01% 11.08%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 418
Function<br />
Table 122<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
(1-7 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Alief <strong>ISD</strong> Brownsville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Conroe <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Cypress-<br />
Fairbanks<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Fort Bend<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Garland <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Function Total $ 809,496,199 411,780,715 472,974,975 373,711,660 767,677,091 532,228,528 528,686,518 457,084,513<br />
11 Instruction-$ 458,494,939 254,940,517 264,469,144 229,111,988 486,957,589 313,372,232 330,919,369 279,602,202<br />
11 Instruction-% 56.6% 61.9% 55.9% 61.3% 63.4% 58.9% 62.6% 61.2%<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-$ 13,127,763 5,737,589 8,553,058 4,722,738 6,157,296 9,602,154 7,777,269 7,606,555<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-% 1.6% 1.4% 1.8% 1.3% 0.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.7%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-$ 28,861,167 8,795,457 18,261,682 3,391,951 17,854,085 24,297,859 6,710,976 8,436,067<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-% 3.6% 2.1% 3.9% 0.9% 2.3% 4.6% 1.3% 1.8%<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-$ 14,654,439 4,480,547 7,368,009 3,208,664 11,699,446 5,366,659 5,477,426 9,391,593<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-% 1.8% 1.1% 1.6% 0.9% 1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 2.1%<br />
23 School Leandership-$ 50,207,567 23,903,681 23,655,395 22,176,993 41,323,664 34,242,036 28,918,021 27,187,636<br />
23 School Leandership-% 6.2% 5.8% 5.0% 5.9% 5.4% 6.4% 5.5% 5.9%<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-$ 26,167,517 15,782,923 17,244,116 14,347,375 23,879,105 22,172,607 20,009,449 18,151,855<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-% 3.2% 3.8% 3.6% 3.8% 3.1% 4.2% 3.8% 4.0%<br />
32 Social Work Services-$ 5,759,903 683,751 729,246 412,879 977,504 3,936,442 840,256 916,222<br />
32 Social Work Services-% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2%<br />
33 Health Services-$ 6,576,528 3,908,983 5,435,032 3,907,678 8,479,310 6,460,550 6,777,310 5,481,906<br />
33 Health Services-% 0.8% 0.9% 1.1% 1.0% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.2%<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-$ 26,584,483 12,901,693 12,853,368 18,236,846 29,747,000 11,825,733 15,844,009 8,958,598<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-% 3.3% 3.1% 2.7% 4.9% 3.9% 2.2% 3.0% 2.0%<br />
35 Food Services-$ 37,117,351 23,210,351 28,342,742 15,452,477 42,289,872 23,262,025 21,138,423 25,547,341<br />
35 Food Services-% 4.6% 5.6% 6.0% 4.1% 5.5% 4.4% 4.0% 5.6%<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-$ 14,672,286 5,653,189 15,660,167 8,965,218 14,014,202 10,847,917 9,641,405 6,164,195<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-% 1.8% 1.4% 3.3% 2.4% 1.8% 2.0% 1.8% 1.3%<br />
41 General Administration-$ 16,783,309 6,752,555 11,984,796 5,835,193 10,834,221 10,190,401 11,645,204 10,138,055<br />
41 General Administration-% 2.1% 1.6% 2.5% 1.6% 1.4% 1.9% 2.2% 2.2%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 419
Function<br />
Table 122 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
(1-7 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Alief <strong>ISD</strong> Brownsville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Conroe <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Cypress-<br />
Fairbanks<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
El Paso <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Fort Bend<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Garland <strong>ISD</strong><br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-$ 80,370,032 36,994,107 48,773,651 35,953,211 64,786,609 47,882,618 47,860,657 35,620,537<br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-% 9.9% 9.0% 10.3% 9.6% 8.4% 9.0% 9.1% 7.8%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-$ 9,070,352 5,057,816 5,962,976 3,933,371 4,834,051 5,166,241 5,211,484 3,506,919<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.1% 0.6% 1.0% 1.0% 0.8%<br />
53 Data Processing Services-$ 21,048,563 2,645,471 3,472,127 4,055,078 3,801,557 3,603,054 9,915,260 10,308,598<br />
53 Data Processing Services-% 2.6% 0.6% 0.7% 1.1% 0.5% 0.7% 1.9% 1.9%<br />
92 Incremental Costs-$ - - - - - - - 0.0%<br />
92 Incremental Costs-% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-$ - 332,085 209,466 - 41,580 - - 66,234<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 420
Function<br />
Table 122 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
(8-13 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Katy <strong>ISD</strong> Klein <strong>ISD</strong> Lewisville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pasadena<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Plano <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong><br />
All Function Total $ 809,496,199 485,323,474 353,384,394 435,756,141 449,269,173 464,035,774 414,015,153<br />
11 Instruction-$ 458,494,939 299,169,407 214,248,971 271,220,883 266,305,299 297,638,714 248,773,867<br />
11 Instruction-% 56.6% 61.6% 60.6% 62.2% 59.3% 64.1% 60.1%<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-$ 13,127,763 6,939,685 4,433,666 6,016,377 6,005,679 8,361,949 5,124,316<br />
12 Instruct. Resources & Media Srvcs-% 1.6% 1.4% 1.3% 1.4% 1.3% 1.8% 1.2%<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-$ 28,861,167 8,323,895 8,634,878 6,484,516 7,272,672 9,393,015 11,528,136<br />
13 Curriculum & Staff Development-% 3.6% 1.7% 2.4% 1.5% 1.6% 2.0% 2.8%<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-$ 14,654,439 3,973,624 3,199,081 7,832,922 5,962,748 3,973,959 5,897,515<br />
21 Instructional Leadership-% 1.8% 0.8% 0.9% 1.8% 1.3% 0.9% 1.4%<br />
23 School Leandership-$ 50,207,567 27,969,427 21,314,501 25,578,719 30,782,750 23,260,875 23,508,594<br />
23 School Leandership-% 6.2% 5.8% 6.0% 5.9% 6.9% 5.0% 5.7%<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-$ 26,167,517 19,243,237 15,976,598 18,967,194 18,562,656 17,980,882 14,077,272<br />
31 Guidance, Counseling, Eval. Srvcs.-% 3.2% 4.0% 4.5% 4.4% 4.1% 3.9% 3.4%<br />
32 Social Work Services-$ 5,759,903 - 308,221 100,498 222,538 1,081,944 2,929,736<br />
32 Social Work Services-% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.7%<br />
33 Health Services-$ 6,576,528 4,648,318 3,692,914 4,530,006 4,378,411 5,018,660 4,596,616<br />
33 Health Services-% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1%<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-$ 26,584,483 13,595,685 9,224,480 9,394,594 11,752,604 9,780,856 7,503,763<br />
34 Student (Pupil) Transportation-% 3.3% 2.8% 2.6% 2.2% 2.6% 2.1% 1.8%<br />
35 Food Services-$ 37,117,351 22,740,358 19,032,955 19,125,507 27,837,308 20,662,364 20,686,367<br />
35 Food Services-% 4.6% 4.7% 5.4% 4.4% 6.2% 4.5% 5.0%<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-$ 14,672,286 9,930,131 6,643,710 10,198,787 6,380,798 7,412,473 10,783,159<br />
36 Extracurricular Activities-% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 2.3% 1.4% 1.6% 2.6%<br />
41 General Administration-$ 16,783,309 9,556,447 7,045,048 9,859,951 9,690,445 8,948,197 9,819,375<br />
41 General Administration-% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% 1.9% 2.4%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 421
Function<br />
Table 122 (continued)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2011 FAST Fiscal Peer Group Comparison of Total Operating Expenditures by Function – All Funds<br />
(8-13 Fiscal Peers – Does not Include FAST Fiscal Peers that are also Urban or Local Peers)<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Katy <strong>ISD</strong> Klein <strong>ISD</strong> Lewisville<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Pasadena<br />
<strong>ISD</strong><br />
Plano <strong>ISD</strong><br />
Ysleta <strong>ISD</strong><br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-$ 80,370,032 45,947,469 29,718,368 39,728,378 44,283,997 41,480,178 39,589,366<br />
51 Facility Maintenance & Operations-% 9.9% 9.5% 8.4% 9.1% 9.9% 8.9% 9.6%<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-$ 9,070,352 5,054,914 4,295,052 923,346 4,609,826 2,902,846 4,271,879<br />
52 Security & Monitoring Services-% 1.1% 1.0% 1.2% 0.2% 1.0% 0.6% 1.0%<br />
53 Data Processing Services-$ 21,048,563 8,182,987 5,555,969 5,640,849 4,866,204 5,591,979 4,925,192<br />
53 Data Processing Services-% 2.6% 1.7% 1.6% 1.3% 1.1% 1.2% 1.2%<br />
92 Incremental Costs-$ - - - - - 443,936 -<br />
92 Incremental Costs-% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-$ - 47,890 59,982 153,614 355,238 102,947 -<br />
95 Payments to JJAEPS-% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 422
Food Services<br />
The Food Service Department administers the National School Lunch Program and Breakfast Program<br />
for all <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> schools. The mission of the department is to actively support the academic achievement<br />
of students by providing nutritious, appetizing meals that promote health, well-being and learning.<br />
Major areas of responsibilities include: approving and maintaining applications for federally subsidized<br />
lunch and breakfast meal benefits for income eligible students, operation and supervision of all campus<br />
kitchens, purchase of all food and supplies, maintenance of kitchen equipment, all financial related<br />
activities to include payroll for department employees, accounts payable/receivable and budgeting. On<br />
average, Food Services served approximately 54,000 lunches and 21,000 breakfasts in FY2012.<br />
60,000<br />
Table 123<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Average Independent Daily Lunch School Participation District<br />
Average Daily Lunch Three Participation Year Comparison – Three Year Comparison<br />
50,000<br />
40,000<br />
30,000<br />
20,000<br />
10,000<br />
-<br />
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
25,000<br />
Table 124<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Average Independent Daily Breakfast School Participation District<br />
Average Daily Breakfast Three Participation Year Comparison – Three Year Comparison<br />
20,000<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
0<br />
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug<br />
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 423
Table 125<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Food Service Productivity<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011<br />
Number of free lunches served 6,630,431 6,961,968 7,197,365<br />
Number of reduce priced lunches served 798,387 701,948 554,829<br />
Number of full price lunches served 1,727,434 1,674,505 1,661,788<br />
Number of A la Carte meal equivalents 1,407,146 1,368,566 1,290,902<br />
Total number of lunches served 10,563,398 10,706,987 10,704,884<br />
Average daily free lunches served 37,888 39,783 41,128<br />
Average daily reduced price lunches served 4,562 4,011 3,170<br />
Average daily full price lunches served 9,871 9,569 9,496<br />
Total average daily lunches served 60,362 61,183 61,171<br />
Number of free breakfasts served 2,980,023 3,116,045 3,276,842<br />
Number of reduce priced breakfasts served 237,324 202,274 165,092<br />
Number of full price breakfasts served 201,648 195,167 206,236<br />
Number of A la Carte meal equivalents 242,153 235,514 222,149<br />
Total number of breakfasts served 3,661,148 3,749,000 3,870,319<br />
Average daily free breakfasts served 17,029 17,806 18,725<br />
Average daily reduced price breakfasts served 1,356 1,156 943<br />
Average daily full price breakfasts served 1,152 1,115 1,178<br />
Total average daily breakfasts served 20,921 21,423 22,116<br />
Number of days breakfast & lunch served 175 175 175<br />
Below is a representative sample of neighboring districts’ meal prices for <strong>FY2013</strong>. Breakfast prices for<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> will remain constant from the prior two years. Lunch prices for 2011-12 were increased slightly<br />
from $2.15 to $2.25 for elementary lunch and from $2.25 to $2.40 for secondary lunch. As shown in the<br />
chart below, student meal prices at A<strong>ISD</strong> are comparable with a majority of the neighboring districts.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 424
School District<br />
Enrollment<br />
FY2012<br />
Table 126<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
District Meal Pricing Comparison for <strong>FY2013</strong><br />
FY 2011 1<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong> Breakfast Price<br />
FY 2013 Lunch Price<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Free & Reduced Elementary Secondary 2 Elementary Secondary 2 Adult Lunch<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> 85,273 64.0% $1.25 $1.25 $2.25 $2.40 $3.00<br />
Bastrop <strong>ISD</strong> 9,043 65.1% $1.00 $1.00 $1.75 $2.00/$2.25 $3.00<br />
Eanes <strong>ISD</strong> 7,691 2.7% no breakfast no breakfast $2.75 $3.25/$3.50 $3.50<br />
Hays C<strong>ISD</strong> 15,262 48.9% $1.25 $1.35 $2.10 $2.30 $2.65/$3.00 3<br />
Lake Travis <strong>ISD</strong> 6,940 14.6% $1.50 $1.60/$1.75 $2.70 $3.00/$3.60 $3.60<br />
Leander <strong>ISD</strong> 32,034 22.5% $1.35 $1.60 $2.10 $2.35 $2.75/$3.25 4<br />
Manor <strong>ISD</strong> 7,173 79.4% $1.35 $1.35 $2.35 $2.60 $3.00<br />
Pflugerville <strong>ISD</strong> 22,657 51.4% $1.75 $1.75 $2.50 $2.75 $3.50<br />
Round Rock <strong>ISD</strong> 44,590 29.9% $1.35 $1.35 $2.20 $2.45 $3.00<br />
1 Data from 2011 AEIS Report. 2012 statistics not available at the time of print<br />
2 Indicates Middle School/High School Prices<br />
3 Indicates Staff/Guest Prices<br />
4 Indicates Elementary/Secondary Adult Prices<br />
Table 127<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Historical & Current District Meal Lunch & Breakfast Pricing<br />
FY2009 FY2010 FY2011<br />
FY2012<br />
Adopted<br />
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
Adopted<br />
Charge per lunch to students:<br />
Full Price - Elementary $ 2.10 $ 2.10 $ 2.10 $ 2.15 $ 2.25<br />
Full Price - Secondary $ 2.25 $ 2.25 $ 2.25 $ 2.30 $ 2.40<br />
Reduced Priced Meal - All Levels $ 0.40 $ 0.40 $ 0.40 $ 0.40 $ 0.40<br />
Charge per lunch to adults $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3.00<br />
Charge per breakfast to students:<br />
Full Price - Elementary & Secondary $ 1.25 $ 1.25 $ 1.25 $ 1.25 $ 1.25<br />
Reduced Priced Meal - All Levels $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30 $ 0.30<br />
Charge per breakfast to adults A la Carte A la Carte A la Carte A la Carte A la Carte<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 425
Transportation<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Transportation Department serves approximately 20,000 students each day through 239<br />
regular routes, 153 special education routes, 120 mid-day routes, 8,000 field trips, athletic routes and<br />
summer service routes for extended learning opportunities for students.<br />
Transportation Department was recognized for “best practices” in the implementation and optional use of<br />
technology to effectively and efficiently operate the pupil transportation system. The department has<br />
current technology applications to manage efficient routing, a stop location finder, school personnel<br />
access to bus route information, field trips and field trip requests, after school buses, planning fleet<br />
maintenance, mapping rider addresses, discipline referrals, video of bus incidents, an accident database<br />
and GPS system.<br />
Effective fleet management is another key performance area with excellent results. The average age of<br />
the fleet is 6.7 years, which results in reduced total costs. Replacement buses meet the latest lowemission<br />
EPA standards. The District owns a plug-in hybrid bus; it is in process of piloting six propane<br />
buses made possible through Railroad Commission funding, and has retrofitted 93 buses that are seven<br />
to 10 years old to improve indoor air quality and reduce emissions. All of these efforts are aligned to the<br />
district’s commitment to and focus on environmental stewardship.<br />
Table 128<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Transportation Historical Information<br />
FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011<br />
Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual<br />
Total Avg Daily Ridership 16,726 16,842 16,957 19,708 19,723 19,915<br />
Mileage<br />
Route Related 5,416,465 5,461,537 5,595,685 5,453,876 5,716,537 5,841,439<br />
Extracurricular 579,474 594,262 702,045 864,553 839,453 957,718<br />
Total Buses<br />
Regular Education 281 289 298 302 306 306<br />
Special Education 187 192 192 198 194 194<br />
Buses by Age<br />
1 to 5 yrs 219 259 266 275 311 219<br />
6 to 10 yrs 212 215 71 86 96 196<br />
Over 10 yrs 37 7 153 139 93 97<br />
*Estimated<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 426
Risk Management<br />
The district’s risk management program encompasses various means of protecting the district against<br />
losses. Various risks of loss include those related to torts, theft, damage, destruction of assets, business<br />
interruption, errors and omissions, injuries to employees, and disasters.<br />
The district participates in the Texas Association of School Boards Modified Self-Funded program for its<br />
general liability, professional/legal liability and vehicle liability insurance. The district partners with the<br />
Texas Association of School Boards for the administration of its self-funded Workers’ Compensation<br />
insurance. The district is self-insured up to $400,000 per occurrence for losses related to workers’<br />
compensation and has purchased excess coverage through a commercial insurer licensed in the State of<br />
Texas.<br />
The district has commercial insurance for all other risks of loss. There were no significant reductions in<br />
coverage in the past fiscal year and there were no settlements exceeding insurance coverage for each<br />
the past three fiscal years.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Property/Casualty Coverage<br />
<br />
Building & Contents<br />
Deductible per occurrence including Wind & Hail and AOP - $100,000<br />
Property Limit - $1,924,353,250<br />
Loss Limit - $750,000,000<br />
<br />
General Liability<br />
Deductible per Occurrence - $20,000<br />
Per Occurrence Limit - $1,000,000<br />
Employee Benefits per Occurrence Limit - $100,000<br />
<br />
School Professional Legal Liability<br />
Deductible per Occurrence - $40,000<br />
Per Occurrence Limit - $1,000,000<br />
Annual Aggregate - $1,000,000<br />
Limits adjusted for Sexual Misconduct Cases<br />
<br />
Fleet Liability<br />
Deductible per Occurrence - $100,000<br />
Texas Tort Limits $100,000/$300,000/$100,000 apply<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 427
Academic Programs<br />
The district provides a rich and varied curriculum to approximately 87,000 students at 119 regular<br />
campuses and 10 special campuses. This means that our focus in every classroom is on teaching and<br />
learning every day. Through high standards that ensure academic rigor in a thinking curriculum, our<br />
students’ learning opportunities are grounded in the skills they will need for success in the 21 st Century.<br />
Early Childhood<br />
The district curriculum, for prekindergarten, is closely tied to the guidelines issued by the State of Texas<br />
for all students. Prekindergarten students receive instruction in all of the areas of language and literacy,<br />
mathematics, social studies, science, technology, health, visual arts, music, and physical education to<br />
prepare them for success in kindergarten. Emphasis is placed on:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Language and concept development<br />
Development of problem solving skills<br />
Promotion of interest and joy in learning<br />
Provision of ample opportunities for self-expression and divergent thinking<br />
Development of responsibility and self-control<br />
Promotion of feelings of security and success.<br />
Prekindergarten teachers are provided a state-adopted curriculum that integrates subject areas and<br />
concepts throughout a strong literacy development program. The curriculum requirements are aligned<br />
with the district curriculum initiative, pre-K through grade 12.<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District offers a free full-day kindergarten program for all children who<br />
turn five on or before September 1st of the current school year. Kindergarten serves as the introduction<br />
into the public school system for most children. <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> considers kindergarten to be an integral part of<br />
the elementary school program. Instead of being a version of first grade, kindergarten expands the social,<br />
emotional, cognitive and physical skills typical of preschool classrooms, focusing on deeper, more<br />
rigorous academic content integrated within a developmentally appropriate framework that guides<br />
children in becoming more intentional, self-directed learners ready for first grade. Kindergarten is an<br />
exciting time for both the child and his or her parents. During this important year, the child builds a strong<br />
base for continuing academic success.<br />
Kindergarten teachers incorporate the district’s Literacy Framework, which includes a K-12 balanced<br />
literacy approach to the teaching of reading and writing using Reader's and Writer's Workshop. Balanced<br />
literacy provides structures and support systems that enable all students to acquire the knowledge, skills,<br />
and habits needed to meet or exceed the standards in reading, writing, listening and speaking. In science<br />
and mathematics, kindergarten teachers integrate inquiry and hands-on learning through the use of<br />
experiments, investigations, and manipulative materials and tools. Additionally, just like their first through<br />
sixth grade peers, all A<strong>ISD</strong> kindergarteners participate in enrichment activities, rotating on a daily basis<br />
between art, music and physical education classes.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 428
Mathematics<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> mathematics curriculum consists of high quality instructional and assessment resources<br />
that are aligned to state and national standards. The A<strong>ISD</strong> mathematics curriculum framework<br />
incorporates and utilizes the Texas College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS), the English<br />
Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), and the Response to Intervention (RtI) models as provided by<br />
the Texas Education Agency. Mathematics in <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>:<br />
PK: Pre-Kindergarten Mathematics<br />
Grades K-5: Elementary Mathematics<br />
Grades 6-8: Middle School Mathematics (including Algebra I)<br />
Grades 9-12: High School Mathematics (Algebra I, Geometry, Math Models and Applications,<br />
Algebra II, Pre-calculus, AP Statistics, AP Calculus AB and AP Calculus BC).<br />
Science<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Science Department will develop and support the implementation of a rigorous curriculum<br />
for scientific inquiry so that all students become scientifically literate through investigating the knowledge,<br />
systems, patterns and processes of the natural world.<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District’s science program utilizes a systemic PK-12 Scientific Inquiry<br />
approach to the teaching and learning of science based on the National Science Education Standards.<br />
Scientific Inquiry refers to the diverse ways in which scientists study the natural world and propose<br />
explanations based on the evidence derived from their work. Scientific Inquiry also refers to the activities<br />
of students in which they develop knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, as well as an<br />
understanding of how scientists study the natural world.<br />
The science curriculum is developed in accordance with the framework designed by McTighe, J. and<br />
Wiggins, G., Understanding by Design Expanded 2 nd Edition, 2005. This design utilizes a conceptual<br />
framework that includes essential questions, assessments and lesson plans for teachers that undergirds<br />
implementation of inquiry-based teaching and learning for students.<br />
Social Studies<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Social Studies Curriculum Department fosters in students habits of body and mind that<br />
enable them to become active citizens in a democratic society within an increasingly complex, diverse,<br />
and interdependent world. Students acquire the necessary knowledge, skills, and values to become<br />
lifelong learners and productive citizens.<br />
Students in social studies are provided with opportunities to understand that the present connects to the<br />
past and affects the future. Teaching for deep understanding in social studies begins with planning the big<br />
ideas students should learn. Essential questions guide a three-stage design process called "backward<br />
design" that creates a rigorous and engaging curriculum leading to improved student performance in a<br />
standards-based environment (McTighe, J. and Wiggins, G., Understanding by Design Expanded 2 nd<br />
Edition, 2005).<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 429
Research shows that all students learn through a variety of relevant experiences. Interactions that<br />
activate and build on prior knowledge and promote higher level thinking skills are essential for all<br />
students, especially those who are English Language Learners, (Echevarria, J., Vogt, M.E., & Short, D.,<br />
Making Content Comprehensible for English Language Learners—The SIOP Model, 2000). Active<br />
learning is essential for mastery of social studies concepts.<br />
Response to Intervention<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Response to Intervention (RtI) framework is designed to support all students with college<br />
readiness rigor at each grade level inclusive of clear expectations for teaching and learning. Instructional<br />
supports will be provided to meet the needs of all students evidenced by fidelity of implementation and<br />
data from progress monitoring. The RtI framework aligns a process in which each student receives<br />
instruction to address his/her unique learning needs. Instruction is composed of evidenced based<br />
teaching techniques, materials, and strategies provided within the core curriculum. To meet the needs of<br />
all students, instructional practices within the core general education curriculum setting will include<br />
differentiation, resources matching student need, supplemental and intensive instruction, and changing<br />
pace but not rigor. Inherent in this process is the understanding that students respond differently to<br />
instruction, and data collected regarding student performance must guide instruction. Universal screeners<br />
and progress monitoring tools are integral to a successful RtI framework. High quality professional<br />
development to learn research-based approaches is key to the implementation of an efficacious RtI<br />
framework. RtI process requires a commitment to ongoing, job-embedded professional development for<br />
example, in data collection and analysis, and differentiated instruction (Ehren, Ehren, Proly, 2009).<br />
Special Education<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> is committed to inclusive practices for students with disabilities and understands the provision<br />
of services for students with disabilities in the least restrictive environment is not only a legal mandate,<br />
but is also a practice that has a sound pedagogical basis. The use of research-based instructional<br />
strategies and collaborative practices to support students in the general education curriculum is an<br />
integral component of inclusion. Decisions regarding the services for students with disabilities are<br />
individually determined, and the extent to which students receive services in general education settings<br />
and/or other specialized settings are determined collaboratively.<br />
Reading Improvement, Dyslexia, and 504 Service<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Department of Reading Improvement, Dyslexia and Section 504 Services will monitor<br />
each campus compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Amendment Act 2008, Section 504, for<br />
students in Elementary and Secondary Schools (federal law), and the Texas Dyslexia Procedures 2007<br />
(state law), and that each campus provides a summer program for struggling readers in middle and high<br />
School. The Three Tier intervention research model is a component of both the Section 504 process and<br />
the State Dyslexia Guidelines.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 430
Gifted and Talented<br />
The Gifted/Talented program seeks to provide an appropriate match between a child’s ability, interest and<br />
motivation and the educational opportunities that can nurture these qualities to the highest degree. A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
is committed to meeting the needs of all the children in its schools, including those of high academic<br />
and/or intellectual ability whose needs may not be met by the general curriculum. Differentiated<br />
instruction is an identified best practice and required for K-12 students participating in GT programs in the<br />
state. Students in the A<strong>ISD</strong> gifted/talented program are provided with assignments that match their level<br />
of instructional level in the content area for which they have been identified to receive services.<br />
English Language Learners<br />
Our mission is to help ensure that English Language Learners attain English proficiency and focus on<br />
academic success while building capacity in critical foreign languages. The Department of English<br />
Language Learners is responsible for designing professional development to support teachers and<br />
administrators, improving teaching and learning in the classroom, providing supplemental resources, and<br />
supporting the implementation of quality, research-based instructional programs for ELL’s.<br />
We are committed to creating a program in which ELL’s are consistently held to high academic, cognitive,<br />
linguistic and socio-cultural expectations beginning on the first day of enrollment. These four program<br />
components are supported by the findings of highly respected researchers in the fields of bilingual<br />
education, ESL and language acquisition. In addition, instruction must be aligned with student needs and<br />
language proficiencies in English and the native language. ELL students participating in mainstream<br />
programs from PK to 12 need substantial support from well-trained teachers who understand the second<br />
language acquisition process and who support, respect and value bilingual, bicultural learners (Collier,<br />
2009).<br />
Physical Education<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District sees its mission as ensuring that all students will progress<br />
academically and intellectually, and will graduate prepared for personal success and inspired to<br />
contribute to society. The primary purpose of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Physical Education is to provide all students with<br />
the knowledge, skills and desire to live a healthy and physically active life. Students will develop health<br />
related fitness, physical competence, cognitive understanding and positive attitudes about physical<br />
activity so they can adopt a healthy and physically active lifestyle. A<strong>ISD</strong> physical education program<br />
strives to provide all students an opportunity to learn meaningful content with appropriate instruction.<br />
Health<br />
The philosophy and mission for A<strong>ISD</strong> Health Education Department is to teach Health Education through<br />
a comprehensive integrated approach. Topics include, physical/social/mental health, environmental<br />
health, consumer health, disease prevention, human sexuality, parenting and paternity awareness,<br />
nutrition, alcohol, tobacco, drugs, healthy lifestyles, interpersonal skills, goal setting, decision-making, and<br />
CPR/first-aid/AED. You will also find national and state standards for health education, district<br />
requirements, current news and research. The high school credit health course covers all of the TEKS for<br />
Health 8-12th grade and National Health Education Standards. A<strong>ISD</strong>s Health Education curriculum<br />
includes characteristics of effective health education instruction.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 431
Fine Arts<br />
The A<strong>ISD</strong> Fine Arts Department shares the following philosophy regarding Fine Arts curriculum and<br />
instruction:<br />
Instruction in the Fine Arts is essential for the development of the whole child.<br />
Fine Arts education is for all students.<br />
Well-educated students have basic knowledge, skills and appreciation of the Fine Arts.<br />
The Fine Arts provide unique experiences that combine the physical, mental, social and<br />
emotional aspects of human existence.<br />
The Fine Arts are a means of communication beyond the written and spoken word with the self,<br />
others and the world around us.<br />
The Fine Arts are a historical component of civilization and a body of knowledge, which provide a<br />
sense of cultural integrity and a sense of belonging.<br />
Participation in the Fine Arts maximizes critical thinking skills and creativity.<br />
Fine Arts education prepares students to be successful, contributing members of society.<br />
World Languages<br />
Under the Strategic Plan for 2010-2015, the mission of <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> is to provide all students with an<br />
education that is high quality, challenging and inspiring so that we accomplish our vision of being an<br />
outstanding school district from which lifelong learners emerge. The teachers of World Languages are<br />
committed to this mission by designing and implementing curriculum that continually focuses on<br />
academic rigor by way of content and knowledge, self-directed learning, critical and creative thinking skills<br />
and relevance and application. Language instruction and exploration coincide with these tenets and<br />
contribute to developing students who will be successful in the personal, professional and global arena.<br />
Educational Technology<br />
We create, promote and sustain a digital-age learning culture that provides the tools and resources for a<br />
rigorous, relevant and engaging education. Educational Technology provides digital tools teachers and<br />
students need to create effective, technology-rich learning environments.<br />
Career and Technical Education<br />
The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District in partnership with parents and our community exists to provide a<br />
comprehensive educational experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make<br />
a positive contribution to society. We provide opportunities for students to acquire 21st century academic<br />
and technical skills needed for entry into the global workforce and/or postsecondary education in order to<br />
become contributing members of their community.<br />
Library Services<br />
Library programs positively impact literacy, life-long learning and student achievement. Librarians teach<br />
literature and information skills and collaborate with teachers to integrate them into the curriculum and<br />
partner with classroom teachers on projects that help students use a variety of resources, conduct<br />
research, and present their findings. Libraries are supported financially and programmatically by the<br />
educational community to achieve the mission of the campus and district. Librarians encourage life-long<br />
learning and literacy as a source of pleasure and power.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 432
Accountability Indicators / Significant Changes<br />
House Bill (HB) 3 passed by the 81 st Texas Legislature, made significant changes to parts of Chapter 39,<br />
Public School System Accountability, in the Texas Education Code (TEC). The changes shift the focus of<br />
the state accountability system from meeting satisfactory standards on the state assessments to meeting<br />
both satisfactory and college-ready standards on new STAAR assessments.<br />
The Texas Education Agency created a transition plan for implementation of HB 3. School years 2011-12<br />
and 2012-13 are transition years. State accountability ratings were suspended for 2011-12, and 2012-13<br />
will see the release of a limited state system. The full state accountability rating system is expected in<br />
2013-14. The new state accountability system is likely to look very different from the accountability system<br />
that has been in place for the last decade.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 433
Academic Assessment & Accountability<br />
Background & Overview<br />
Over the course of the last 22 years, the Texas state assessment system has undergone significant<br />
changes. From 1990 until 2002, the mandated state assessment was the Texas Assessment of Academic<br />
Skills (TAAS). In 2002-03, assessment at all grade levels became more rigorous with comprehensive<br />
content expansion and assessment based on knowledge and skills (TEKS) and higher level thinking skills<br />
that focus on content, context and cognitive level in the format of a new Texas Assessment of Knowledge<br />
and Skills (TAKS). Most recently, in response to new legislative mandates set forth by the 80 th and 81 st<br />
Texas Legislatures, the Texas Education Agency created a new set of standardized tests. The State<br />
Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is intended to introduce yet more rigor, depth and intensity<br />
to the testing items and to establish stronger links to postsecondary readiness. The state’s goal in<br />
developing the new system is that Texas will be among the top 10 states for graduating college-ready<br />
students by the 2019–2020 school year.<br />
STAAR tests mathematics and reading for students in grades 3 through 8; writing at grades 4 and 7;<br />
science at grades 5 and 8; and social studies at grade 8. Grades 3 through 9 began STAAR testing in<br />
2012. In addition, the STAAR includes fifteen end-of-course (EOC) tests intended to test course-specific<br />
knowledge. Students who entered high school in fall 2011 and beyond are required to take the End-of-<br />
Course (EOC) assessment in each subject in which they are enrolled and for which an EOC assessment<br />
exists. Students must meet a minimum score requirement on each test and meet a cumulative score<br />
requirement in each subject area in order to graduate.<br />
A complete set of STAAR passing standards has not yet been issued. The timeline for standard-setting<br />
activities differs for STAAR grades 3 through 8 and STAAR EOC due to timing of available assessment<br />
data and different legislative requirements. For STAAR EOC, operational assessment data were available<br />
from the spring 2011 administrations. Therefore, EOC performance standards were set in February 2012,<br />
prior to the spring administrations. Passing standards for the grades 3-8 tests are not expected to be<br />
released until January 2013.<br />
Because of the delay in standard-setting for STAAR at grades 3-8, data availability is currently limited.<br />
Results of a TEA-commissioned bridging study allow for comparisons between 2011 TAKS and 2012<br />
STAAR. The bridging study’s TAKS equivalent standards were commissioned for the purposes of federal<br />
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) reporting (see below). The final STAAR standards will require a higher<br />
level of student performance than was required for TAKS.<br />
With the new assessment system, the Texas Legislature also mandated the development of a new<br />
accountability system to replace the one that had been in place since 2004. The new system shifts focus<br />
from meeting satisfactory requirements to providing more emphasis on college readiness, as well as<br />
measuring progress and closing gaps between high-performing and low-performing groups.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 434
During the 2011-12 year, accountability ratings were suspended; no new state ratings were issued to any<br />
schools or districts across Texas. The new accountability system is still in development and is expected to<br />
be released in the spring of 2013. In 2013, new ratings based on STAAR performance will be issued for<br />
the first time and in 2014 the full system is expected to be in place.<br />
The district must also continue to comply with federal accountability requirements to receive federal<br />
school funding. The current federal accountability system has been in place since sweeping educational<br />
reform occurred with the passing of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 under the leadership of<br />
President George Bush.<br />
NCLB supports standards-based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and<br />
establishing measurable goals increase student educational achievement outcomes. The focus on<br />
stronger accountability and emphasis on results is manifested in the concept of Adequate Yearly<br />
Progress (AYP), a measure of accountability for each state based on standards it submits to the USDE<br />
for approval. The performance measures must specify incremental increases in proficiency for all<br />
students and all student groups (White, African American, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged,<br />
Special Education and Limited English Proficient) that culminate in 100% proficiency for all students by<br />
2014. Participation in testing is another component of AYP, as all campuses, districts and the state must<br />
meet a 95% standard of all students tested at specified grade levels. Attendance and graduation rates are<br />
additional indicators for AYP.<br />
As AYP requirements continue to get more and more stringent, standards for all student groups continue<br />
to increase. In response to widespread criticism of NCLB requirements, the current federal administration<br />
has allowed states to submit waivers. Last year the U.S. Secretary of Education told Congress that 82<br />
percent of America's schools could fail to achieve AYP this year based on the higher passing standards.<br />
In February, the U.S. Department of Education invited each state education agency to submit a waiver<br />
from specific NCLB requirements. On September 6, 2012, the Texas Education Agency announced its<br />
intent to submit waiver requests to the U.S. Department of Education of certain provisions of the ESEA,<br />
as amended by P.L. 107-110 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, including waivers to sections on AYP<br />
calculations and performance targets. Essentially, waivers will be requested to allow Texas to use its own<br />
testing standards and accountability rating system. The status of the waiver request is pending as of this<br />
writing.<br />
State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR)<br />
The STAAR test is the new state-mandated assessment system used to determine whether students<br />
have mastered the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). STAAR is administered to students<br />
yearly beginning in 3rd grade. The STAAR program at grades 3–8 assesses the same grades and<br />
subjects as were assessed on TAKS. For high school, general subject-area TAKS tests are replaced with<br />
fifteen STAAR end-of-course (EOC) assessments.<br />
The focus of the new system is to increase postsecondary readiness requirements so that Texas students<br />
are more competitive nationally and internationally. At grades 3–8, students will be tested in mathematics<br />
and reading. Students will also be tested in writing at grades 4 and 7, science at grades 5 and 8, and<br />
social studies at grade 8. STAAR EOC assessments will be available for Algebra I, geometry, Algebra II,<br />
biology, chemistry, physics, English I, English II, English III, world geography, world history and US<br />
history.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 435
The STAAR test is criterion-referenced instrument. A criterion-referenced (CRT) test is a measurement<br />
that relates test items to specific learning objectives which students have been taught. Since a criterionreferenced<br />
test measures a student’s performance on each objective, the results are particularly useful in<br />
instructional planning. Areas of high and low student performance are easily identifiable, and remedial<br />
programs focusing on deficit areas can be devised.<br />
STAAR Modified or STAAR Alternate<br />
The STAAR Modified test assesses students with disabilities who are receiving instruction in the Texas<br />
Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) but for whom the STAAR test is considered an inappropriate<br />
measure of their academic progress. Students are assessed at their grade level. The STAAR Modified<br />
tests are administered on the same schedule as STAAR and are designed to measure mastery of the<br />
TEKS for their enrolled grade/course accessed through modifications.<br />
The STAAR Alternate test assesses students who have a significant cognitive disability. Students are<br />
assessed at their enrolled grade level. The STAAR Alternate assessment is not a traditional paper or<br />
multiple choice test; students are assessed by their teachers based on the dimensions of a rubric and<br />
results are submitted through an online instrument. Assessment occurs during a window from January to<br />
April. STAAR Alternate is designed to measure mastery of the TEKS for their enrolled grade/course<br />
accessed through prerequisite skills.<br />
STAAR Spanish and STAAR L<br />
STAAR Spanish is an administration for English Language Learners (ELLs) in grades 3-5 for whom a<br />
Spanish-version of STAAR is the most appropriate measure of academic progress.<br />
STAAR-L is a special administration of STAAR for ELLs who meet requirements for taking the<br />
linguistically-accommodated tests. STAAR L may be administered to ELL students who:<br />
are not most appropriately assessed with STAAR Spanish, AND<br />
have not yet attained a TELPAS advanced high reading rating, AND<br />
have been enrolled in U.S. schools for 3 years or less (5 years or less if a qualifying asylee or<br />
refugee).<br />
Linguistic accommodations are made in order to assist students in overcoming language barriers and<br />
provide a meaningful assessment of academic knowledge and skills.<br />
STAAR Performance Categories<br />
The STAAR assessment system will identify three performance categories. For the general STAAR assessments,<br />
STAAR Modified and STAAR L, the labels for the performance categories are<br />
Level III: Advanced Academic Performance<br />
Level II: Satisfactory Academic Performance<br />
Level I: Unsatisfactory Academic Performance<br />
For the STAAR Alternate assessments, the performance categories are<br />
Level III: Accomplished Academic Performance<br />
Level II: Satisfactory Academic Performance<br />
Level I: Unsatisfactory Academic Performance<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 436
Graduation Requirements under STAAR/EOC<br />
Along with the introduction of STAAR EOC testing, graduation requirements related to assessment have<br />
changed for students who enter ninth grade in the fall of 2011 and beyond. Graduation requirements will<br />
vary depending on the type of high school program in which the student enrolls. The three programs are<br />
the Minimum High School Program (MHSP), the Recommended High School Program (RHSP) and the<br />
Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP). Students in all programs must meet the following STAAR<br />
EOC cumulative score requirements:<br />
Student is required to achieve a cumulative score that is at least equal to the product of the<br />
number of STAAR EOC assessments required in a content area and the scale score that<br />
indicates Level II: Satisfactory Academic Performance.<br />
Student must achieve a minimum, which is set within a reasonable range of the Level II:<br />
Satisfactory Academic Performance standard, in order for the score to count towards the<br />
student’s cumulative score.<br />
A student’s cumulative score is determined using the student’s highest score on each STAAR<br />
EOC assessment the student is required to take for graduation purposes.<br />
In addition to the cumulative score requirements, the number of EOC tests required and the performance<br />
standards that must be met will vary according to which of the three high school programs the student<br />
enrolls.<br />
Testing cut scores and EOC cumulative score requirements will be phased in over a 5-year period. For<br />
details on STAAR Assessment-Related Graduation Requirements go to:<br />
http://www.tea.state.tx.us/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147506323<br />
Graduation Requirements under TAKS<br />
Students who entered the ninth grade prior to the fall of 2011 are not subject to the STAAR EOC<br />
graduation requirements. These students will graduate under the requirements of the previous<br />
assessment system, TAKS. Students must pass four TAKS exit level exams in social studies, Math, ELA,<br />
Science to graduate.<br />
Texas Primary Reading Inventory (TPRI)<br />
The TPRI is a state approved instrument which is used to measure the reading development of young<br />
students in kindergarten through third grade. The measurement provides for early identification of reading<br />
skills and comprehension development, thereby giving teachers useful information for targeted<br />
instructional assistance. The assessment is administered in September to students in grades K – 3.<br />
TELPAS – Texas English Language Proficiency Observation Protocols<br />
The TELPAS or Observation Protocol is administered annually to show the progress of Limited English<br />
Proficient (LEP) students in kindergarten through 12 th grade. The domains assessed are listening,<br />
speaking, reading and writing in grades K – 2 and listening, speaking and writing in grades 3-12.<br />
Teachers holistically rate each LEP student’s English language proficiency based on classroom<br />
observations and daily interactions with the student. The TELPAS tests are administered in March and<br />
April.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 437
PSAT<br />
The PSAT is the qualifying examination for the national Merit Scholarship Program and is administered in<br />
October. The test measures verbal reasoning skills, math problem-solving skills, critical reading skills and<br />
writing skills that have been developed by students during the course of their education. The PSAT<br />
serves as a valuable tool to assist students and their parents with early college preparation and planning.<br />
SAT<br />
The SAT is a reasoning test that is intended to assess a student's readiness for college.It is administered<br />
by the College Board and tests knowledge of reading, writing and math. Most students take the SAT<br />
during their junior or senior year of high school, and many colleges and universities use the SAT to make<br />
admission decisions.<br />
ACT<br />
The ACT is a national college admission examination which covers four skill areas: English, mathematics,<br />
reading, and science, plus an optional writing test. The ACT is designed to measure what a student has<br />
learned in school. The ACT includes 215 multiple choice questions and takes approximately three hours<br />
to complete.<br />
Student Success Initiative<br />
Beginning in 2003, students in grade 3 were required to pass the state assessment in reading to be<br />
promoted. The grade 3 advancement requirement was eliminated in 2010. Beginning in 2005, students in<br />
grade 5 were required to pass the state assessment in reading and mathematics to be promoted; and<br />
beginning in 2008, students in grade 8 were required to pass the state assessments in reading and<br />
mathematics for promotion. The SSI requirements were suspended for 2011-2012 due to delays in<br />
standard-setting for the STAAR assessments in grades 3-8. SSI requirements will resume in 2013.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 438
Table 129<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
SAT Performance<br />
SAT VERBAL AND MATH AVERAGE SCORES 2008 - 2012<br />
Year<br />
Critical Reading Mathematics Total * No. of<br />
Students<br />
Took<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> State Nation A<strong>ISD</strong> State Nation A<strong>ISD</strong> State Nation Reasoning<br />
Test in A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
2008 506 488 502 530 505 515 1036 993 1017 2337<br />
2009 502 486 501 526 506 515 1028 992 1016 2224<br />
2010 500 484 501 527 505 516 1027 989 1017 2373<br />
2011 493 479 497 521 502 514 1014 981 1011 2747<br />
2012 497 474 496 523 499 514 1020 973 1010 2774<br />
1-year change 4 -5 -1 2 -3 0 6 -8 -1 27<br />
5-year change -9 -14 -6 -7 -6 -1 -16 -20 -7 437<br />
SAT WRITING AVERAGE SCORES<br />
2008 - 2012 Total (all subjects)<br />
Year<br />
Writing<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> State Nation A<strong>ISD</strong> State Nation<br />
2008 493 480 494 1529 1473 1511<br />
2009 488 475 493 1516 1467 1509<br />
2010 487 473 492 1514 1462 1509<br />
2011 480 465 489 1494 1446 1500<br />
2012 476 461 488 1496 1434 1498<br />
1-year change -4 -4 -1 2 -12 -2<br />
5-year change -17 -19 -6 -33 -39 -13<br />
* Total of the subjects: Verbal and Math<br />
Data source: College Board Profile Reports<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 439
Table 130<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
SAT Performance by Ethnicity<br />
2008-12 SAT CRITICAL READING, MATH, AND WRITING AVERAGE SCORES BY ETHNICITY<br />
Ethnicity<br />
2008 2009<br />
2010 2011<br />
2012<br />
No. CR Math Writing No. CR Math Writing No. CR Math Writing No. CR Math Writing No. CR Math Writing<br />
Native<br />
American 13 538 534 511 16 528 538 496 14 574 548 503 20 512 572 504 13 551 553 513<br />
Asian 122 531 600 524 127 547 605 530 133 543 617 545 150 514 585 512 147 538 602 518<br />
African<br />
American<br />
Mexican or<br />
Mexican<br />
American<br />
Puerto<br />
Rican<br />
Other<br />
Hispanic,<br />
Latino, or<br />
Latin<br />
American<br />
249 425 441 423 270 419 435 408 278 407 429 395 324 408 427 390 314 416 439 397<br />
397 451 484 442 468 448 475 439 439 517 488 445 579 433 468 422 656 444 478 426<br />
13 478 503 468 9 480 499 490 16 504 533 493 13 467 475 426 14 509 530 530<br />
306 442 464 431 328 444 463 434 383 439 464 432 478 438 465 426 471 438 466 466<br />
White 1076 563 585 545 875 571 594 554 949 565 589 549 1107 571 591 554 1062 571 590 590<br />
Other 38 539 527 516 52 534 558 517 31 489 511 466 50 492 526 482 61 523 533 533<br />
No<br />
Repsonse<br />
123 465 474 453 79 489 481 458 52 551 559 519 26 515 517 492 36 494 507 507<br />
Total 2337 506 530 493 2224 502 526 488 2373 500 527 487 2747 493 521 480 2774 497 523 523<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 440
School<br />
Table 131<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
SAT 2012<br />
Campus, District, State and National Average Scores<br />
Number<br />
Tested<br />
Critical<br />
Reading Math Writing ** Total<br />
Akins 318 431 464 422 1317<br />
Anderson 357 565 589 539 1693<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> 356 522 548 498 1568<br />
Bowie 555 524 563 503 1590<br />
Crockett 172 452 471 431 1354<br />
Eastside Global Tech 8 391 413 375 1179<br />
Eastside Memorial 32 400 442 391 1233<br />
Garza 32 566 532 514 1612<br />
Lanier 178 388 424 370 1182<br />
LASA 186 658 659 631 1948<br />
LBJ 113 375 404 362 1141<br />
McCallum 238 539 553 515 1607<br />
Reagan 81 367 399 351 1117<br />
Richards 5 548 518 534 1600<br />
Travis 143 392 420 376 1188<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> 2,774 497 523 476 1496<br />
State 172,802 474 499 461 1434<br />
National 1,664,479 496 514 488 1498<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 441
Table 132<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
FY2012 TAKS Comparison by Student Group<br />
2010 2011<br />
2012<br />
Tests Evaluated: TAKS, TAKS-A for selected<br />
Grades and Subjects<br />
Met Standard<br />
Tests Evaluated: TAKS, TAKS-A, TAKS-M,<br />
TAKS-Alt for selected Grades and Subjects<br />
Met Standard<br />
Tests Evaluated:<br />
Grades 10-11: TAKS, TAKS-A,<br />
TAKS-M,<br />
Grades 3-8: STAAR, STAAR L,<br />
STAAR M, and EOC as applicable<br />
for selected Grades and Subjects<br />
Met Standard a<br />
State<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
2010<br />
Difference State <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
2011<br />
Difference <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> b<br />
Reading/ELA<br />
(70% Standard)<br />
(70% Standard)<br />
(N/A c )<br />
All Students 90% 87% -3% 90% 88% -2% 88%<br />
African American 87% 82% -5% 87% 83% -4% 82%<br />
Hispanic 87% 82% -5% 86% 84% -2% 84%<br />
White 96% 98% 2% 95% 97% 2% 97%<br />
Econ Disadv 86% 81% -5% 85% 82% -3% 82%<br />
Mathematics<br />
(60% Standard)<br />
(65% Standard)<br />
(N/A c )<br />
All Students 84% 82% -2% 84% 84% 0% 85%<br />
African American 74% 70% -4% 75% 73% -2% 72%<br />
Hispanic 81% 77% -4% 81% 80% -1% 81%<br />
White 91% 95% 4% 91% 95% 4% 95%<br />
Econ Disadv 79% 74% -5% 79% 78% -1% 79%<br />
Writing<br />
(70% Standard)<br />
(70% Standard)<br />
(N/A c )<br />
All Students 93% 91% -2% 92% 92% 0% 95%<br />
African American 91% 88% -3% 89% 87% -2% 94%<br />
Hispanic 92% 88% -4% 91% 89% -2% 94%<br />
White 96% 97% 1% 94% 98% 4% 99%<br />
Econ Disadv 91% 87% -4% 90% 88% -2% 93%<br />
Science<br />
(55% Standard)<br />
(60% Standard)<br />
(N/A c )<br />
All Students 83% 80% -3% 83% 80% -3% 82%<br />
African American 75% 69% -6% 74% 68% -6% 70%<br />
Hispanic 78% 72% -6% 78% 74% -4% 76%<br />
White 92% 96% 4% 92% 96% 4% 96%<br />
Econ Disadv 76% 70% -6% 76% 71% -5% 73%<br />
Social Studies<br />
(70% Standard)<br />
(70% Standard)<br />
(N/A c )<br />
All Students 95% 94% -1% 95% 93% -2% 95%<br />
African American 93% 90% -3% 92% 89% -3% 92%<br />
Hispanic 94% 92% -2% 94% 91% -3% 93%<br />
White 98% 99% 1% 98% 99% 1% 99%<br />
Econ Disadv 93% 90% -3% 93% 90% -3% 93%<br />
4-year Longitudinal Graduation Rate<br />
All Students 84.3%<br />
Class of 2010<br />
78.6% -5.7% 85.9%<br />
Class of 2011<br />
80.0% -5.9%<br />
African American 78.8% 71.5% -7.3% 80.9% 74.0% -6.9%<br />
Hispanic 78.8% 72.9% -5.9% 81.8% 75.0% -6.8%<br />
White 91.6% 89.8% -1.8% 92.0% 89.6% -2.4%<br />
Econ Disadv 81.9% 73.1% -8.8% 83.7% 77.1% -6.6%<br />
Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-8)<br />
School Year 2009-10 School Year 2010-11<br />
All Students 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0%<br />
African American 0.4% 0.2% -0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0%<br />
Hispanic 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1%<br />
White 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%<br />
Econ Disadv 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1%<br />
Class of 2012<br />
Class of 2012 Graduation<br />
Tables will be released in the<br />
TEA 2013 District<br />
Accountability Data Tables<br />
School Year 2011-12<br />
2011-12 Annual Drop Out<br />
Rate Tables will be released<br />
in the TEA 2013 District<br />
Accountability Data Tables<br />
a Percent met TAKS equivalent standard for grades 3-8 and TAKS passing standard for grades 10 and 11.<br />
b Comparable state results are not available.<br />
c State accountability ratings have been suspended for 2012. No standards were set.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 442
Gains in the percentage of students meeting the passing standard were largely evidenced for all groups<br />
and subjects through the end of the TAKS. In 2012, most grades (except for grades 10-11 for whom the<br />
new assessment system does not apply) took the STAAR assessment for which standards will not be set<br />
until January 2013. Using the TAKS equivalent standards, commissioned by the TEA for purposes of<br />
AYP, most student groups gained or remained the same.<br />
Table 133<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
2012 STAAR EOC Preliminary Results for Texas Big-8 School Districts<br />
Percentage Meeting Level II (Phase-in 1) Standard - All Students Tested<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
Corpus<br />
Christi<br />
Dallas<br />
El Paso<br />
Fort<br />
Worth<br />
Houston<br />
San<br />
Antonio<br />
Ysleta<br />
State<br />
English I Reading 69% 60% 56% 59% 55% 59% 53% 64% 68%<br />
English I Writing 54% 44% 43% 44% 37% 47% 34% 48% 55%<br />
Algebra I 84% 68% 75% 83% 78% 79% 68% 79% 83%<br />
Biology 84% 76% 83% 81% 81% 84% 78% 85% 87%<br />
World Geography 79% 72% 76% 75% 71% 73% 68% 79% 81%<br />
Source: Texas Assessment Management System - STAAR Assessment Summary Results 2012<br />
Compared to the peer group districts, A<strong>ISD</strong>’s EOC testers led the Big 8 urban districts in passing rates on<br />
STAAR End-of-Course exams in English I Reading (69%), English I Writing (54%), Algebra I (84%) and<br />
World Geography (79%). A<strong>ISD</strong> students were second among the Big 8 districts in Biology (84%).<br />
.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 443
Table 134<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
AYP Preliminary Results 2012 Performance Measures<br />
Comparison with Peer Group Districts<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan- Stage 3<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> 85% * 77% † 81% * 97% 79% † 59% 76% * 83% 68% * 79% * 95% 76% * 56% 78% *<br />
Aldine <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan- Stage 1<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
Aldine 86% 83% 87% 87% 86% 60% 84% 83% 76% 86% 85% 83% 60% 85%<br />
Arlington <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan- Stage 1<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
Arlington 87% 84% 84% 93% 84% † 69% * 80% † 80% 71% 77% 89% 75% 63% 76%<br />
Dallas <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan- Stage 3<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
Dallas 82% 76% 83% 92% 81% 57% * 78% 74% 63% 77% 87% 73% 55% * 74%<br />
Fort Worth <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan-Stage 3<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
Fort Worth 82% 76% 83% † 92% 80% † 64% 77% 76% 64% 78% 88% 74% 58% 76%<br />
Houston <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan-Stage 3<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
Houston 84% 80% 83% 95% 82% 58% * 79% 80% 71% 81% 91% 78% 57% * 80%<br />
North East <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan- Stage 1<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
North East 91% 84% 89% 96% 85% 72% 79% 86% 74% 82% 93% 78% 64% 79%<br />
Northside <strong>ISD</strong><br />
District<br />
Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan- Stage 1<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
Northside 91% 88% 90% 95% 87% 71% * 81% 86% 81% 85% 92% 82% * 67% * 81% †<br />
San Antonio <strong>ISD</strong> Missed AYP-Reading and Math Performance-School Improvement Plan-Stage 3<br />
District<br />
Reading (AYP Target 87%) Mathematics (AYP Target 83%)<br />
All AA His White Eco Sped LEP All AA His White Eco Sped LEP<br />
San Antonio 79% * 74% 79% * 85% † 78% * 55% * 74% * 70% 63% 71% 77% 70% 53% * 71%<br />
* Missed AYP for this performance measure due to the 2% and /or the 1% federal caps<br />
† Met AYP with Required Improvement<br />
Missed AYP for this performance measure<br />
Standards in math and reading AYP increase rapidly each year toward the federal goal of 100%<br />
proficiency in 2014. In 2012, reading and math standards increased to 87% and 83% respectively. Amid<br />
the increasing standards, A<strong>ISD</strong> met AYP for the all students group in math but missed AYP for the all<br />
students group in reading due to the 2% and/or the 1% federal caps. As a district, A<strong>ISD</strong> did not meet<br />
mathematics and reading standards and will enter Stage 3 of the School Improvement Program.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 444
Accomplishments<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Outperforms Other Urban School Districts in Math and Reading in National Test<br />
December 7, 2011 - <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District fourth and eighth grade students continued to<br />
outperform their peers in large cities and other urban school districts on the 2011 National Assessment of<br />
Educational Progress (NAEP), also known as the Nation’s Report Card. NAEP is the only assessment<br />
that allows valid comparisons among students in urban school districts in<br />
different states.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>’s 2011 mathematics results demonstrate that the percentage<br />
of fourth and eighth graders scoring at or above Basic remains higher<br />
than the percentage of their peers scoring at or above Basic in most<br />
other TUDA districts and in large city (LC) schools.<br />
<br />
<br />
The percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong> fourth graders scoring at or above Basic (87%) in mathematics was<br />
significantly higher than that of their peers in 18 TUDA districts , LCs (74%) and national public<br />
schools (82%).<br />
The percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong> eighth graders scoring at or above Basic (74%) in mathematics was<br />
significantly higher than that of their peers in 17 TUDA districts, LCs (63%) and was similar to that<br />
of their peers in national public schools (72%).<br />
Although NAEP reading scores across the nation and among all TUDA districts remained relatively flat in<br />
fourth and eighth grade during 2011, the percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong> students in both grades scoring at or above<br />
Basic was higher than that of their peers in most large city and TUDA districts. In addition, A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
percentages have increased significantly in both grades since 2005 and have increased at a greater rate<br />
than the state’s percentage.<br />
<br />
<br />
Overall, the percentage of fourth graders scoring at or above Basic in reading (68%) was<br />
significantly higher than that of their peers in 15 other TUDA districts and LCs (55%) and was<br />
similar to that of their peers in national public schools (66%).<br />
The percentage of A<strong>ISD</strong>’s eighth graders scoring at or above Basic reading (71%) was<br />
significantly higher than 15 other TUDA districts (see Figure 2), LCs (65%) and not significantly<br />
different from their peers in national public schools (75%).<br />
NAEP is administered by the National Center for Education Statistics, within the U.S. Department of<br />
Education. NAEP is a nationally representative assessment that reports on what<br />
students know and can do in core academic subjects.<br />
NAEP is the only common assessment taken by students nationwide and provides<br />
the only consistent comparison between students in those urban districts. Results are<br />
reported for student populations, and for subgroups of those populations, at the<br />
national and state levels , and at the district level for the TUDA districts. Since the<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 445
NAEP TUDA only tests a sample of the entire district student population, no individual student or campus<br />
results are issued in the report.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> has participated in the NAEP urban schools assessment since 2005. In 2011, 21 urban school<br />
districts participated in the TUDA: Albuquerque, Atlanta, <strong>Austin</strong>, Baltimore, Boston, Charlotte-<br />
Mecklenburg, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Detroit, District of Columbia, Fresno, Hillsborough County,<br />
Houston, Jefferson County, Los Angeles, Miami-Dade, Milwaukee, New York City, Philadelphia and San<br />
Diego.<br />
For these TUDA districts, results are reported at the district level. School districts can then compare their<br />
results to the national average for public schools, other similar TUDA districts, similar LCs and the state.<br />
In this way, the NAEP assessment is unique in that it allows A<strong>ISD</strong> to compare fourth and eighth grade<br />
students’ performance over time to other similar districts.<br />
Ten <strong>Austin</strong> Schools Named to National ‘Higher Performing’ List<br />
Ten <strong>Austin</strong> schools have been named to the 2011 list of “Higher Performing” schools by the nonprofit<br />
National Center for Educational Achievement (NCEA). The list is based on student achievement and<br />
other factors. The schools are:<br />
<br />
<br />
Secondary School - Anderson HS, Bowie HS, LASA HS, and Ann Richards School for Young<br />
Women Leaders<br />
Elementary Schools - Clayton, Doss, Hill, Kiker, McBee, and Zilker.<br />
In creating its list, NCEA relied on several factors, including multiple years of state test scores, school<br />
demographics, academic improvement from one year to the next, and whether the school met federal<br />
standards for student achievement and progress.<br />
Schools with similar demographics can have very different<br />
levels of student performance. NCEA developed a method to<br />
identify schools that grow their students’ academic performance<br />
more than the performance of students in demographically<br />
similar schools. NCEA also identifies schools whose students’<br />
performance meets NCEA College and Career Readiness<br />
Targets.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Test Results for ACT Increases, Exceeds State & National Scores<br />
September 14, 2011 - On the ACT, A<strong>ISD</strong>’s composite score of 21.3<br />
was up from last year’s score of 20.9 and was once again higher than<br />
the state score of 20.8. For the first time, A<strong>ISD</strong>’s composite score<br />
was slightly higher than the national composite of 21.1. A<strong>ISD</strong>’s<br />
average ACT scores increased in every area: English, 20.0;<br />
Mathematics, 22.4; Reading, 21.0; and Science, 21.1.<br />
The highest score possible on each section of the ACT is 36.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 446
Percentage<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Student Participation in SAT Continues to Increase, Exceeds Statewide Performance<br />
September 14, 2011- <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District (A<strong>ISD</strong>) student participation in the SAT test<br />
continued to increase in 2011. A<strong>ISD</strong> students outscored their counterparts in the state in Critical Reading,<br />
Math and Writing, while students’ average score was above that of<br />
the nation in Math, according to data released by the College<br />
Board.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> students’ average total score of 1494 points included 493 in<br />
Verbal (Critical Reading), 521 in Math and 480 in Writing. A<strong>ISD</strong><br />
exceeded the state’s average by 48 points. Statewide, students<br />
scored 479 in Verbal, 502 in Math and 465 in Writing, respectively, for a total average state score of 1446<br />
points. The overall average SAT score for A<strong>ISD</strong> students was slightly lower than the national SAT<br />
average score of 1500.<br />
The SAT represents the level of academic preparedness associated with a high likelihood of college<br />
success and completion.<br />
In <strong>Austin</strong>, 2,747 students took the SAT in 2011—an increase of 374 students (16%) from the previous<br />
year. ACT test participation also increased from 1,160 in 2010 to 1,231 in 2011, a total increase of 71<br />
students (6%).<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Graduation Rates Increase for Third Year<br />
July 11 - Graduation rates for <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District's class of 2011 have increased to 80<br />
percent, according to the Texas Education Agency's recently released report on graduation and<br />
completion rates.<br />
Since 2008, graduation rates among A<strong>ISD</strong>'s high school seniors have risen steadily from 74.3 to 80<br />
percent. Each year, the TEA reports graduation rates for the previous school year. Information for the<br />
past five years is included in the chart.<br />
82.0<br />
81.0<br />
80.0<br />
79.0<br />
78.0<br />
77.0<br />
76.0<br />
75.0<br />
74.0<br />
73.0<br />
72.0<br />
Graduation Rates 2007-2011<br />
80.0<br />
78.6<br />
75.6<br />
75.3<br />
74.3<br />
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
Graduating Class<br />
The U.S. Department of Education<br />
uses data such as graduation rates to<br />
determine whether the district and its<br />
campuses are meeting the federal<br />
Adequate Yearly Progress<br />
requirements under the No Child Left<br />
Behind act.<br />
Beginning this year, the DOE requires<br />
all student groups to be evaluated<br />
under the NCLB law, which requires all<br />
student groups must meet the AYP<br />
graduation rate standard, which is 75<br />
percent, or the required improvement<br />
target of one percent.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 447
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Post-Secondary Enrollment Rates Increase for the Class of 2011; Five<br />
Percentage-Point Gain in A<strong>ISD</strong> Graduates Enrolling in Colleges and Universities<br />
July 26, 2012 - Post-secondary enrollment rates for the <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District's class of 2011<br />
have increased from 62 to 67 percent, according to the National Student Clearinghouse's recently<br />
released results. In post-secondary enrollment, a student has enrolled in an educational institution after<br />
graduating from high school. This includes enrollment in two- and four-year- colleges, technical or trades<br />
schools that may be private or public institutions.<br />
"Post-secondary enrollment rates are a critical indicator for A<strong>ISD</strong> because they tell us how many of our<br />
graduates are enrolling in colleges and universities beyond high school." Superintendent Meria<br />
Carstarphen said. "In today's global economy, higher education provides a powerful path to success."<br />
Post-secondary enrollment rates for A<strong>ISD</strong>'s high school graduates have risen steadily, from 55 percent in<br />
2002 to 67 percent in 2011. Information for the past 10 years is included in the chart.<br />
During the fall and spring of the 2010-11 school year, A<strong>ISD</strong>’s Department of Research and Evaluation<br />
offered interactive seminars for campus leadership teams, which included administrators, school<br />
improvement facilitators, counselors and teacher leaders. Team<br />
members from the district created plans to improve college and career<br />
preparation, and shared them with each of A<strong>ISD</strong>’s high school<br />
campuses.<br />
After a dip in post-secondary enrollment rates from 66 percent for the<br />
class of 2009 to 62 percent for the class of 2010, district staff members<br />
helped students and their families complete the Free Application for<br />
Federal Student Aid.<br />
With the support of the <strong>Austin</strong> Chamber of Commerce, high schools<br />
also hosted Financial Aid Saturdays where trained volunteers provided<br />
help for families completing the FAFSA.<br />
The increased assistance resulted in A<strong>ISD</strong> senior FAFSA completion rates increasing from 29 percent in<br />
2010 to 54 percent in 2011. Eighty-four percent of the class of 2011 graduates who enrolled in a postsecondary<br />
institution completed a FAFSA application.<br />
A full report of post-secondary enrollment for A<strong>ISD</strong>'s class of 2011 will be available in September. The<br />
report will contain further analysis of post-secondary enrollment by student demographic groups,<br />
including race, ethnicity and economic status, and the types of post-secondary institutions in which they<br />
enroll.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 448
Six A<strong>ISD</strong> Schools Make TBEC Honor Roll<br />
October 19, 2011 This week, the Texas Business and Education Coalition (TBEC)<br />
released its annual honor roll, and out of 253 schools<br />
throughout the state that made the list, six were from<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong>! These Honor Roll schools represent less than<br />
4% of all public schools in Texas, and include 34 high<br />
schools, 38 middle schools and 181 elementary<br />
schools.<br />
In analyzing every public school in Texas, TBEC considers only the school’s commended<br />
performance, the state’s highest standard for academic achievement, and sets specific<br />
targets for schools based on grades served and student demographics.<br />
This year being the last for the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS)<br />
performance data, TBEC’s standards were the toughest in the 12 -year history of the<br />
award.<br />
Congratulations to these A<strong>ISD</strong> schools for being named to the TBEC Honor Roll:<br />
•Anderson High School<br />
•Ann Richards School for Young Women Leaders<br />
•Hill Elementary School<br />
•Kealing Middle School<br />
•Liberal Arts and Science Academy (LASA)<br />
•Oak Hill Elementary School<br />
Two <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Schools Earn America’s Best High Schools Designation<br />
May 25, 2012 - Two high schools in the <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District have earned<br />
places on the Newsweek 2012- list of ‘America’s Best High Schools.’<br />
Liberal Arts and Science Academy was ranked 38th in the country, while Anderson High<br />
School ranked 551st. Rather than focus, as in the past, on one metric (AP tests taken per graduate),<br />
Newsweek consulted a group of experts to develop a yardstick that fully reflects a school’s success<br />
turning out college-ready (and life-ready) students. New criteria have six components: graduation rate<br />
(25%), college matriculation rate (25%), and AP tests taken per graduate (25%), plus average SAT/ACT<br />
scores (10%), average AP/IB scores (10%), and AP courses offered per graduate (5%).<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 449
A<strong>ISD</strong> Uses Results from Rigorous, National Review in Aim for World-Class Standards<br />
March 29, 2012 - As part of its drive to achieve the community's vision for the <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School<br />
District to become nationally recognized as an outstanding school district that instills a passion for lifelong<br />
learning in all students, the district is pleased to<br />
announce the results of The Eli and Edythe Broad<br />
Foundation's diagnostic audit, which ranks A<strong>ISD</strong> among the<br />
nation's top performing districts in several areas, notably<br />
strategic planning and financial resource systems.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> is one of only two "promising practice" districts throughout the United States selected by the Broad<br />
Foundation for the diagnostic audit and among only 14 districts the foundation considered.<br />
"<strong>Austin</strong> is setting an example for the nation. A<strong>ISD</strong> is a terrific school district, striving to become world<br />
class," said Shelley Billig, vice President of RMC Research, an education consulting company that<br />
collaborated with the Broad Foundation in conducting the review. "The district opened itself to an outside,<br />
critical eye that affirmed both the district's clear and impressive strengths and a few areas that need more<br />
attention. We have full confidence that the strong leadership in the district will continue its path to<br />
improvement and that A<strong>ISD</strong> will become one of the nation's leading school districts."<br />
Four A<strong>ISD</strong> High Schools Earn National Ranking from U.S. News and World Report<br />
May 21, 2012 - Four <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District high<br />
schools are among the best in the nation, according to the 2012<br />
U.S. News and World Report Best High School rankings. Liberal<br />
Arts Science Academy, Anderson High School, Bowie High<br />
School and McCallum High School earned national and state recognition in the annual report.<br />
To be eligible for a state ranking, a school must be awarded a national gold or silver medal. Liberal Arts<br />
and Science Academy earned a national gold medal for being ranked 54th in the nation and 7th in the<br />
state. Anderson, Bowie and McCallum High Schools earned silver medals for their rankings. Anderson is<br />
676th in the nation and 61st in the state, Bowie is 704th in the nation and 64th in the state and McCallum<br />
is 712th in the nation and 66th in the state. Data was analyzed from more than 21,000 schools across the<br />
country to determine the rankings.<br />
174 <strong>Austin</strong> Seniors Garner Recognition as National Scholars<br />
2012 – <strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> recognizes 174 seniors who earned national recognition for their exemplary<br />
performance in the National Merit Scholarship Program, the National Hispanic Scholar Award Program,<br />
and the National Achievement Scholarship Program for 2012. This fall, 174 seniors from the <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Independent School District are being recognized for outstanding academic performance by the National<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 450
Merit Scholarship Program, the National Hispanic Recognition Program and the National Achievement<br />
Scholarship Program. Twenty-one students received recognition in more than one program.<br />
"We congratulate these students for this remarkable achievement,” Superintendent Meria Carstarphen<br />
said. “This national recognition earned by these students brings honor to their schools and communities.<br />
It reminds us of our duty to continue to challenge and inspire students to perform at elevated levels so<br />
they are prepared for higher education and the workforce.”<br />
Students are selected based on their scores on the preliminary SAT exam, which they take as juniors.<br />
Because of their high scores on this assessment, these students are now eligible for scholarship awards<br />
from institutions of higher education and other grantors.<br />
These students are now eligible for scholarship awards from institutions of higher education and other<br />
grantors.<br />
A breakdown by award category shows:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
42 National Merit Finalists<br />
105 National Merit Semifinalists<br />
40 Scholars for the National Hispanic Recognition Program<br />
8 National Achievement Scholars<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Leads Big 8 in Percentage of Schools Achieving AYP; Districts Across Nation Face<br />
Challenges Amid Increased No Child Left Behind Standards<br />
August 9, 2012 - Amid increasing No Child Left Behind standards for all student groups, the <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Independent School District is leading the Big 8 - comprised of large, urban school districts in Texas - with<br />
60 percent of schools meeting the federally mandated Adequate Yearly Progress requirements. Texas<br />
Education Agency released results from the federal No Child Left Behind accountability system, which<br />
evaluates schools and districts to determine if they have achieved adequate yearly progress in<br />
mathematics, reading and graduation or attendance rates, depending on the grade level.<br />
This year, the Texas AYP proficiency standards for all student groups increased from 80 to 87 percent in<br />
reading and from 75 to 83 percent in mathematics. State accountability ratings from last year will be held<br />
for 2012-13 but the preliminary results show that A<strong>ISD</strong> students have made gains on most indicators,<br />
including state assessment results and attendance and graduation rates. For example:<br />
•Students in third through eighth grade achieved gains in every subject on the new State of Texas<br />
Assessments of Academic Readiness;<br />
•Ninth graders performed well on the state’s new, end-of-course exams relative to other districts, ranking<br />
first or second on every test compared to the other Big 8 districts;<br />
•Students’ average attendance increased for the second, consecutive year;<br />
•A<strong>ISD</strong>’s graduation rate increased to 80 percent; and<br />
•The district’s post-secondary enrollment increased by five percentage points.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 451
A<strong>ISD</strong> Students Win Honors and Earn Slot to Compete in Global Competition<br />
After winning honors for creativity and problem solving in regional and state tournaments, a team of five<br />
high school students are is the first from <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District to earn the right to compete<br />
at Destination ImagiNation's Global Finals — the largest<br />
creative thinking and problem-solving competition in the<br />
world.<br />
Destination ImagiNation, Inc. is an extraordinary non-profit<br />
organization that provides educational programs for<br />
students to learn and experience creativity, teamwork and<br />
problem solving. Annually, it reaches over 100,000 students<br />
across the U.S. and in more than 30 countries. It has more<br />
than 1.3 million alumni and a global network of 35,000<br />
volunteers.<br />
Garza High School students Azulina Green and Lucy<br />
Williams in back row, Mimi Strauss, Mo Quinn, and Andrea<br />
Cañizares-Fernandez from LASA in front row<br />
students with an exciting, joyful and supportive experience<br />
Destination ImagiNation, Inc. began in the summer of 1999,<br />
when nearly 200 international volunteers united to create a<br />
global creative problem solving program that would provide<br />
U.S. Congressman Lamar Smith Congratulates O. Henry Middle School<br />
For National Honor<br />
June 28, 2012 - Congressman Lamar Smith congratulated O. Henry Middle school staff members for<br />
being named 2012 Schools to Watch by the National Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform. The<br />
staff members were in Washington, D.C. for the National Forum's 8th annual Schools to Watch<br />
conference.<br />
"The principal and staff members at O. Henry Middle school deserve<br />
our appreciation and gratitude for their extraordinary efforts on behalf<br />
of our children," Congressman Smith said. "I hope that O. Henry<br />
continues to serve as a shining example of how talented teachers<br />
and engaged administrators can shape the minds and futures of<br />
America's children."<br />
O. Henry earned the recognition for challenging students to use their minds well, being sensitive to the<br />
unique developmental challenges of early adolescence and providing every student with high-quality<br />
teachers and resources.<br />
The National Forum to Accelerate Middle-Grades Reform is an alliance of more than 60 educators,<br />
researches and officers of national associations and foundations dedicated to improving schools for<br />
young adolescents across the country.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 452
Graham Elementary School Earns 2012 National Blue Riboon School Recognition<br />
September 11, 2012 - The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District's Graham Elementary School has earned<br />
the prestigious recognition of being named a 2012 National Blue Ribbon School by the U.S. Department<br />
of Education. Graham is the only Central Texas school—and<br />
among only 20 schools in the state—recognized for overall<br />
academic excellence or for making progress in improving student<br />
academic achievement levels.<br />
The Department of Education has honored Graham as an<br />
"Exemplary Improving" school. The classification recognizes<br />
schools, where at least 40 percent of students are from<br />
disadvantaged communities, that demonstrate the most progress<br />
in improving student achievement levels.<br />
This notable achievement puts Graham in an elite group: Just 18<br />
schools in Texas and 269 schools across the nation were named<br />
National Blue Ribbon Schools for 2012 based on their overall<br />
academic excellence or for making progress in improving student academic achievement levels. In<br />
November, the Education Department will honor Graham and 218 other public schools and 50 private<br />
schools at a ceremony in Washington.<br />
As successful schools go, Graham defies many stereotypes. It's not rich, it's located on the wrong side of<br />
town (east of Interstate 35) and has a student enrollment that is 94 percent Hispanic and African<br />
American and 95 percent economically disadvantaged. Against such odds, Graham is soaring. In 2007,<br />
newly arrived principal Blain Helwig saw Graham's potential and picked up the pace.<br />
Helwig believed the school would succeed if teachers and administrators found a way to quickly and<br />
effectively bring kids up to their grade levels and intervene quickly when they fell behind. He made three<br />
key changes that yielded big results. Working with teachers, he created a culture of hard work at the<br />
school "for students and faculty." He put in place what he called stopgap academic programs to rapidly<br />
accelerate kids who were behind or fell behind. And he tightened discipline. "Discipline is paramount,"<br />
Helwig said. "The kids, teachers and community must know that the school is a learning center." We find<br />
it interesting that Helwig has focused almost entirely on what is happening at school instead of children's<br />
home environments.<br />
Helwig's formula for success is not fancy, but it's obviously effective. The school has been ranked<br />
"exemplary" by the state in 2011, 2010 and 2009. That is akin to earning an A. It kept that ranking this<br />
year, which is a transitional year for Texas public schools that are under a new statewide testing system,<br />
called STAAR for State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness. Because of that, schools retained<br />
their state ratings from 2011.<br />
"We have been fortunate to have consistently produced stellar academic results at Graham," Principal<br />
Blaine Helwig said. "Being selected for this award is both humbling and a culmination of our dedication<br />
toward improving students' lives."<br />
The Texas Education Agency rated Graham as an exemplary school in 2011 and the campus earned<br />
gold performance acknowledgements for commended performance in reading, writing, mathematics and<br />
science. Last year, Helwig was a finalist for H-E-B's statewide, outstanding principal award and a finalist<br />
for A<strong>ISD</strong>'s principal of the year award.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 453
<strong>Austin</strong> High School Earns UIL State Championship, Makes History<br />
May 31, 2012 - The Stephen F. <strong>Austin</strong> High School Red Dragons and theatre directors, Billy Dragoo,<br />
Shannon Tipton, and Ann Dragoo, earned first place at the<br />
University Interscholastic League (UIL) 5A State One-Act Play<br />
Contest! <strong>Austin</strong> High School is the only 5A high school in UIL<br />
State One-Act Play history that has won two consecutive<br />
championships!<br />
The award-winning play performed by the Red Dragons was<br />
"King Of The Moon," by Tom Dudzick.<br />
The troupe's production of King O' the Moon earned each of<br />
the actors an award during the district, area, region and state competitions. Felipe Ramirez, <strong>Austin</strong> High<br />
school student, earned the prestigious honor of best actor during the state competition.<br />
Dragon Players Theater Troupe<br />
pictured, right to left<br />
Top Row: Martin Ramirez, Bonnie<br />
Nolan, Louise Root, Maura Kampa,<br />
Richard Dent, Billy Rainey, Kayle<br />
Litz, Ian Erbe, Shannon Tipton<br />
(Assistant Director)<br />
Bottom Row: Billy Dragoo<br />
(Director), Haley Wilson, Katherine<br />
Schroeder, Riley Ryan-Wood,<br />
Jasmin Weber, Aubrey Elenz, Felipe<br />
Ramirez, Catherine Schwartz, Annie<br />
Dragoo (Assistant Director)<br />
The Dragon Players theatre troupe has won the One-Act Play state championship in 2012, 2011 and<br />
2009.<br />
More than 14,000 Texas high school students in more than 1,000 plays participate in 300 plus contests,<br />
which take place from the beginning of March through the three-day, 40-production State Meet One-Act<br />
Play Contest. The UIL One-Act Play contest is a competition where similarly sized Texas schools present<br />
an 18-40 minute play This is <strong>Austin</strong>’s sixth consecutive year competing at State level, putting <strong>Austin</strong> High<br />
and director Billy Dragoo in a very unique place in UIL history. They are one of only two high schools and<br />
directors who have advanced to the state level five years in a row in conference 5A.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 454
Crockett HS Student Invited to U.S. National High School Mathematics Championship<br />
May 25, 2012 - Although Benjamin Henderson will earn his diploma from Crockett High School next<br />
week, he will continue to represent the school and <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District. The American<br />
Society for Mathematics has invited him to compete in the U.S. National High School Mathematics<br />
Championship in Oklahoma City.<br />
Henderson earned a top score on the Problem Solving Challenge Examination, which qualified him for<br />
the national competition.<br />
The U.S. National High School Mathematics Championship is June 30 to July 1.<br />
Dobie Middle School's College Preparatory Academy Receives National Recognition for<br />
High Performance<br />
April 23, 2012 - J. Frank Dobie College Preparatory Academy has been selected as a National<br />
Demonstration Site for Advancement Via Individual Determination, a kindergarten through postsecondary<br />
school system that has supported thousands of students to become confident, college-going scholars.<br />
Dobie, along with more than 120 other AVID National Demonstration<br />
sites across the country, was selected through an application screening<br />
and review process, which included a site visit by a validation team<br />
from AVID's headquarters in San Diego.<br />
With AVID in place throughout subject area classes, performance<br />
levels improve significantly for all students, but especially for those<br />
students who have historically been underrepresented in<br />
postsecondary education. Schools from around the world that are preparing to implement the AVID<br />
system will visit National Demonstration Sites, such as this one, to observe a highly evolved AVID<br />
system. Jim Nelson, AVID Executive Director, said, "Dobie was selected as a National Demonstration<br />
Site because it has implemented the AVID system throughout the school and can serve as a model for<br />
new AVID sites."<br />
Clayton Math Pentathlon Team Named 2012 National Champions<br />
May 17, 2012 - Clayton Elementary School's Math Pentathlon team has been named the 2012 National<br />
Champions. The students will be recognized tomorrow at a special school assembly. Math Pentathlon is a<br />
program of interactive problem-solving games, designed to motivate and strengthen basic math concepts<br />
and skills for students in kindergarten through 7th grade.<br />
This is the fifth year Clayton students have participated in the program. They claimed the national title in<br />
2008 and earned the Texas state trophy in 2009.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 455
Students Named Semi-finalists in Prestigious Siemens Competition<br />
December 6, 2011-Four A<strong>ISD</strong> students have been named semifinalists in the 2011 Siemens Competition<br />
in Math, Science & Technology, the nation’s premier science research competition for high school<br />
students. This competition recognizes remarkable talent early on, fostering individual growth for high<br />
school students who are willing to challenge themselves through science research. Students also have an<br />
opportunity to achieve national recognition for science research projects that they complete in high<br />
school.<br />
The semi-finalists are:<br />
•Serena Zadoo, Anderson High School<br />
•Ashvin Roharia, Jessica Wang and Aydin Zahedivash, Liberal Arts and Science Academy High<br />
School (LASA)<br />
These were among only 300 students that were honored nationwide. This year’s competition had an<br />
unprecedented 1,541 projects submitted.<br />
Congratulations to all the student winners, Anderson Principal Donna Houser and LASA Principal Stacia<br />
Crescenzi!<br />
About the Siemens Foundation: Administered by the College Board, the Siemens<br />
Competition awards college scholarships ranging from $1,000 to $100,000 in<br />
individual and team categories. The Siemens Foundation provides more than $7<br />
million annually in support of educational initiatives in the areas of Science,<br />
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in the United States. Its<br />
signature programs include the Siemens Competition in Math, Science &<br />
Technology, Siemens Awards for Advanced Placement, and The Siemens We<br />
Can Change the World Challenge, which encourages K-12 students to develop<br />
innovative green solutions for environmental issues.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High School Debate Honored Nationally<br />
September 19 - <strong>Austin</strong> High Debate was honored by the National Forensic League (NFL) with<br />
membership into the prestigious "100 Club". The AHS chapter<br />
received 100 degrees or more last year propelling them into the top<br />
10% of NFL chapters in the nation. Degrees reflect levels of<br />
distinction based on performance based points earned. The<br />
Congratulations to Mr. Mast and his team!<br />
The National Forensic League is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit honor<br />
society created to recognize high school students in speech and debate. It is the oldest and largest<br />
interscholastic forensic organization.<br />
More than 120,000 high school and middle school students, representing nearly 3,000 high schools and<br />
middle schools nationwide, are building their communication, leadership, cognitive, and presentational<br />
skills as members. Since 1925, more than 1.3 million students have found their voice in the NFL.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 456
A<strong>ISD</strong> Elementary Students Runners-Up in National Energy Competition<br />
May 29, 2012 - As homeowners look for ways to save money on their energy bills, a team of eight fifth<br />
grade students at Bryker Woods Elementary successfully reduced energy at their homes, earning them<br />
recognition as a runner-up in the America's Home Energy Education Challenge. The team reduced<br />
energy use by 2.8 percent, which is one percent more than the savings from a major investment of<br />
installing weather stripping in a home.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Energy partnered with the Bryker Woods team to provide outlet insulation templates, weather<br />
stripping, two compact fluorescent bulbs and an energy meter. One of the members who saved the most<br />
energy at home unplugged an additional refrigerator. The other team members turned off lights and<br />
electronics not in use.<br />
America's Home Energy Education Challenge encourages teams of<br />
third through eighth grade students to work with their science teachers<br />
and local utility companies to develop energy savings plans that<br />
reduce the amount of energy used to power their homes. Each student<br />
measured energy consumption in their homes between September and<br />
November 2011 and compared it to data collected during the same<br />
three-month period the year before.<br />
Bedichek Junior Marines Earn Three National Titles<br />
April 17, 2012 - After competing in their first National Middle School Drill<br />
Championship in Dallas, 25 students in Bedichek Middle School's Junior<br />
Marines Leadership Program won three national titles in Unarmed Color<br />
Guard, Armed Drill and Overall Color Guard. In preparation for the<br />
competition, students<br />
practiced two hours daily,<br />
Monday through Thursday,<br />
and four hours Saturday. In<br />
order to participate, students<br />
were required to maintain<br />
passing grades in all course work.<br />
Darrick A. Norton, former Marine Staff Sergeant and<br />
Bedichek teacher, leads the program. Created in the spring<br />
of 2006, the Bedichek Junior Marines Leadership program<br />
was designed to instill values such as integrity, dependability, loyalty, unselfishness and tact. The threeyear<br />
program offers training in leadership and physical endurance, drill and ceremonies, teamwork and<br />
daily personal discipline.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 457
Zavala Student Wins National Hispanic Heritage Safety Poster Contest<br />
December 19, 2011 - Zavala Elementary held an assembly in honor of fifth grade student, Sofía Valadez<br />
who won the national Hispanic Heritage Safety Poster Contest, put on by the National Center for Missing<br />
and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The contest is held annually during Hispanic Heritage Month to teach<br />
elementary school children in Hispanic communities about safety.<br />
During 2011, more than 200 posters from elementary students in<br />
Florida, Georgia, New York and Texas were submitted. Entrants were<br />
asked to design the posters around the proposed theme, "Reglas de<br />
Seguridad Cuando Voy y Vengo de la Escuela / Safety Rules When<br />
Going To and From School” and were judged based on originality of<br />
design, reflection of the contest theme and use of color and materials.<br />
Sofía worked with her art teacher, Laurel Goetz, and was awarded<br />
first place. For that she was received a mini laptop and a framed copy<br />
of her poster from a NCMEC representative. The poster will be printed on a safety tip bookmark that is<br />
distributed to other schools, community centers and libraries.<br />
The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization established in<br />
1984.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Students Win Honors at ExxonMobil Texas Science and Engineering Fair<br />
April 5, 2012 - Five A<strong>ISD</strong> students were recognized as brilliant scientists at this year's ExxonMobil Texas<br />
Science and Engineering Fair. The state competition, hosted by The University of Texas at San Antonio<br />
(UTSA) College of Sciences, drew more than 1,000 young Texans.<br />
The state-level competition offered students who placed at regional science fairs the opportunity to vie for<br />
top prizes and college scholarships as well as a spot at the international science fair. To be eligible to<br />
participate in the EMTSEF, students won first through third place or grand prize at one of 12 regional fairs<br />
held across Texas.<br />
Sydney Hutton (right), a freshman at Bowie High School, earned one of<br />
the top awards in the fair’s senior division. The young scientist received<br />
First Grand Prize in the senior division for her behavioral and social<br />
sciences project: “The Effects of Organic Labeling on Taste Perception.”<br />
Other A<strong>ISD</strong> students to take home awards included:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Bryson Hill, Murchison Middle School, second place in juniordivision<br />
mathematical sciences;<br />
Alex Crisara, Anderson High School, fourth place in seniordivision<br />
engineering: electrical/mechanical;<br />
Serena Zadoo, Anderson High School, fifth place in seniordivision<br />
environmental sciences/analysis; and<br />
Mia Spennato, Murchison Middle School, fifth place in juniordivision<br />
biochemistry.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 458
2012 Scholastic Art and Writing Awards Earned by Two A<strong>ISD</strong> Students<br />
CONGRATULATIONS to Othon Tejeda and Michael Johnson, art students at Stephen F. <strong>Austin</strong> High<br />
School, for earning national recognition in the 2012 Scholastic Art and Writing Awards of 2012, presented<br />
by the Alliance for Young Artists and Writers!<br />
Othon received a Gold National Art award<br />
and Michael received a Silver National Art<br />
(Photography) award.<br />
These students have been identified by<br />
panels of professional artists as the most<br />
talented young artists in the nation.<br />
This year 200,000 works of art and writing<br />
were submitted, and only the top 1,500 were<br />
recognized at the national level!<br />
Othon's piece will be exhibited throughout<br />
the United States for the next two years -<br />
beginning at Parsons The New School of<br />
Design (New York City) and at The U.S.<br />
Department of Education, President's<br />
Committee on the Arts and Humanities in<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
My Grandpa’s Home , above, by Othon Tejeda<br />
These students and their art teachers, Mr. Jeff<br />
S-Martinez and Ms. Melanie Sherwood have<br />
been invited to attend a ceremony at Carnegie<br />
Hall in New York City on June 1 and to<br />
participate in showcase events at Parsons The<br />
New School for Design.<br />
These are the highest national recognition in art<br />
a student can receive. Less than thirty works<br />
from the state of Texas were selected.<br />
OUNG ARTISTS AND WRITE2012<br />
Scholastic Art and Writing Awards<br />
Michael Johnson's photo, above, is entitled "Dreams<br />
ARTISTS AND WRITERS<br />
Adrift."<br />
ALLIANCE FOR YOUNG ARTIS YOUNG ARTISTS As<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 459
A<strong>ISD</strong> UIL State Level Competitors<br />
The University Interscholastic League was created by The University of Texas at <strong>Austin</strong> to provide<br />
leadership and guidance to public school debate and athletic teachers. Since 1910 the UIL has grown into<br />
the largest inter-school organization of its kind in the world. The UIL continues to operate as part of the<br />
University of Texas, under the auspices of the Vice President for Diversity &<br />
Community Engagement.<br />
The UIL exists to provide educational extracurricular academic, athletic, and<br />
music contests. The initials UIL have come to represent quality educational<br />
competition administered by school people on an equitable basis. A<strong>ISD</strong> is<br />
proud to recognize the students who excelled several levels of competition to be able to compete at State<br />
Level.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> State Level Competitors-Athletics<br />
Kevin Ku, 4th in Individual Medley at State Swimming-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Destini Gorrer, 4x100 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Dana Broadnax, 4x100 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Jazmin Ochoa, 4x100 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Macahla Wesley, 4x100 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Kyana Norwood-alternate, 4x100 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Alaeh Horne-alternate, 4x100 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Destini Gorrer, 4x200 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Dana Broadnax, 4x200 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Kyana Norwood, 4x200 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Macahla Wesley, 4x200 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Jazmin Ochoa-alternate, 4x200 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Alaeh Horne-alternate, 4x200 meter relay-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Michele Guerrero, 3rd at State Wrestling- Akins High School<br />
Brian Dorsey, 2nd at State Wrestling-Bowie High School<br />
Will Becker, 3rd at State Wrestling-Bowie High School<br />
Evalynn Reyna, 3rd at State Wrestling-Bowie High School<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> State Level Competitors-Academics<br />
Carl Heiser, 3 rd Place Journalism-Bowie High School<br />
Amav Sastry, 5 th Place Computer Science- LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Roger Cain, 1 st Place Editorial Writing; 4 th Place News Writing-LBJ Comprehensive High School<br />
Seren Villwock, 4 th Place Headline Writing-McCallum High School<br />
Mary Stites, 5 th Place Headline Writing-McCallum High School<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> State Level Competitors-Music<br />
Jackson Ellinger, Viola-McCallum High School<br />
Andy Rogers, Bass-McCallum High School<br />
Daniel Ranry, Percussionist-Bowie High School<br />
Joe Walden, Mallet Percussion-McCallum High School<br />
John Walden, Trumpet-McCallum High School<br />
Trevor Villwock, Piano-McCallum High School<br />
Sydney Barber, Music Theory-McCallum High School<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 460
Louis Raymond-Kolker, Mallet Percussion-McCallum High School<br />
Nick Erck, Choir Member-Anderson High School<br />
Rebecca Teng, Flutist-Anderson High School<br />
Kealing Middle School Band Honored Nationally<br />
2011 Sudler Cup Recipient<br />
The Sudler Cup is an award bestowed to identify, recognize, and honor junior high and middle school<br />
concert band programs that have demonstrated particularly significant high standards of excellence in<br />
concert activities over a period of several years. The official description of a deserving band is as follows:<br />
The band must have achieved and maintained a high standard of literature in the concert area over a period of<br />
several years. The concert band will have placed itself in situations where there has been opportunity for evaluation<br />
by qualified persons or has been rated "superior" at state, regional, or national levels in concert activities. The band<br />
should have performed at regional, state, national, and professional meetings of significance. These can include,<br />
but are not limited to, state music conventions, regional or national MENC meetings, and state or national band<br />
association conventions. The director must have been incumbent in his/her position for at least seven years,<br />
including the current year. A number of the students in the band should have participated in district and all-state<br />
honor bands or similar all-area groups. The total program of music should exemplify what is considered a sound<br />
viable, music education program for this level of endeavor.<br />
Kealing in one of four middle schools nationally to be awarded the 2011 Sudler Cup.<br />
2011 National Wind Band Class AA National Winner<br />
The Kealing Middle School Wind Ensemble was selected as a Class AA National Winner for 2011 by the<br />
National Wind Band Honors Project. The Wind Ensemble was one of eight middle school bands in the<br />
nation to receive this honor.<br />
Texas Foreign Language Association Recognizes Two A<strong>ISD</strong> Teacher<br />
November 18, 2011 The Texas Foreign Language Association (TFLA) has named<br />
Ms. Kelly Long (pictured left), the 2011 TFLA Chinese Teacher of the Year. Ms. Long<br />
is the Chinese teacher at Anderson High School. Ms. Long also has been granted<br />
acceptance into the prestigious Hanban Network of Confucius Classrooms.<br />
As part of this recognition, Ms. Long participated in an interview conducted by the<br />
TFLA committee during their fall conference in October as a candidate for the TFLA<br />
Top Teacher of the Year Award.<br />
Ms. Rachel Tennen, (pictured right) French 1 & 2 teacher at Akins High School<br />
was selected as the Texas Foreign Language Association’s New Teacher of the<br />
Year for 2012. She was recognized during the Saturday luncheon of the fall<br />
conference in October 13.<br />
TFLA is a non-profit organization at the state level whose mission is to advance<br />
the study of modern and classical languages at all levels of instruction.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 461
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Again Leads Texas in Number of National Board Certified Teachers<br />
April 23, 2011 - For the ninth straight year, the <strong>Austin</strong> School District leads the<br />
state with more National Board Certified Teachers than any other school district<br />
in Texas. The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards has<br />
announced that 30 <strong>Austin</strong> teachers have earned National Board Certification,<br />
bringing to 243 the total number of National Board Certified Teachers in A<strong>ISD</strong> for<br />
the 2011-2012 school year.<br />
A three-year study by the National Research Council of the National Academies affirms National Board<br />
Certification has had a positive impact on student achievement, teacher retention and professional<br />
development.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Teacher Wins James F. Venniga Outstanding Teaching of Humanities Award<br />
Linda O'Neal of Akins High School has been named the 2010-11 recipient of the James F. Veninga<br />
Outstanding Teaching of the Humanities Award. Each year Humanities Texas,<br />
the state affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities, honors eleven<br />
teachers with their Outstanding Teacher of the Humanities awards. The James<br />
F. Veninga Outstanding Teaching of the Humanities Award honors James F.<br />
Veninga, Humanities Texas Executive Director Emeritus, for his twenty-three<br />
years of extraordinary contributions to the public humanities in Texas and the<br />
U.S. This winning teacher is chosen from among the nominees for the<br />
Outstanding Teaching of the Humanities Award, receives a $5,000 prize, with<br />
$500 payable to his or her school to purchase instructional materials.<br />
Ms. O'Neal was nominated for the Outstanding Teaching of the Humanities<br />
award by State Representative Valinda Bolton. Her Akins colleagues, among which are those who wrote<br />
letters of support in her nomination such as Charles Moody, are thrilled about her honor. Said one, "This<br />
is a well-deserved honor for someone who has consistently shown how much she cares for our students<br />
and is always finding ways to keep them engaged."<br />
When asked why she chose to go into the teaching profession and, given the rate of attrition in the<br />
profession, why she continues, O'Neal had this to say: "I've always had a strong belief in social justice<br />
and a sincere belief that all students, including our at-risk students, can rise to the occasion and excel...<br />
and I believe teachers can create the change necessary and empower students in order to make this<br />
happen."<br />
Linda O'Neal is a graduate of Lanier High School, student taught at Anderson High School in 2003 and<br />
joined the Akins High School faculty the following year. She teaches U.S. History, A.P. U.S. History, and,<br />
in conjunction with <strong>Austin</strong> Corps, a Government Internship program. Currently students from this program<br />
are doing internships at sites such as the City of <strong>Austin</strong> Mayor's office and the Department of Homeland<br />
Security.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 462
A<strong>ISD</strong> Assistant Athletic Director Enters Hall of Fame<br />
July 24, 2012 - Lynn Davis Pool, <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District's assistant athletic director, has been<br />
inducted into the Texas Girls Coaches Association 2012 Hall of Fame.<br />
"It is a tremendous honor to be recognized by your peers," Pool, who was inspired<br />
by her high school basketball coach to choose coaching as a profession, said. "I<br />
admire the legends in who are in the TGCA Hall of Fame. They are all coaches I<br />
have looked up to for many years."<br />
After serving as the head basketball coach and girls athletic director at Lubbock-<br />
Cooper High School, Pool was a defensive basketball coach at the University of<br />
Texas at <strong>Austin</strong>, where her team won the national championship with a perfect<br />
season of 34 wins. During the 1984 Olympics, Pool was a national floor coach for<br />
the basketball tournaments. Pool was the head girls basketball coach at Bowie<br />
High School from 1990 to 2009 and was then promoted to her current position as<br />
the district's assistant athletic director.<br />
The Texas Girls Coaches Association is one of the largest associations of coaches in the United States. It<br />
started in 1953 with less than 100 members and has grown to more than 5,000 members who are<br />
coaches and administrators in all levels of education.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> High School Director Receives State and National Recognition<br />
CONGRATULATIONS to Billy Dragoo, Theatre Director at Stephen F. <strong>Austin</strong><br />
High School, for being selected as a recipient of the 2011 University<br />
Interscholastic League (UIL) Sponsor/Director Excellence Award! Under his<br />
directorship, <strong>Austin</strong> High has competed at State level for an unprecedented six<br />
consecutive years.<br />
The purpose of the award is for UIL to highlight the contributions of sponsors of<br />
UIL scholastic competition. This award is created to identify and recognize<br />
outstanding sponsors who assist students in developing and refining their<br />
extracurricular talents to the highest degree possible within the educational<br />
system while helping them to keep their personal worth separate from their<br />
success or failure in competition. The Award The Sponsor/Director Excellence<br />
Award winners receive a $1,000 cash award and an appropriate symbolic<br />
memento. All nominees will receive a personalized certificate from UIL.<br />
After Mr. Dragoo and his troupe won state with Mr. Dragoo's one-act version of Mr. Dudzick's play, Mr.<br />
Dudzick decided to revise and release his play as two one-act versions, inspired by Mr. Dragoo's own<br />
cutting of the original. On the acknowledgment page, he credits Mr. Dragoo and his actors for the<br />
inspiration.<br />
Billy Dragoo taught at Granbury High School (which he took to UIL State Level twice) and Bowie High<br />
School in Arlington before coming to <strong>Austin</strong> High in the fall of 1993. Mr. Dragoo earned a BFA from The<br />
University of Texas in 1987 and a Master of Arts from The University of London in 1990.<br />
In the summer of 2002, Mr. Dragoo was granted a scholarship to study at the Globe Theatre in London.<br />
While teaching at <strong>Austin</strong> High, he has three times been named “Teacher of the Year” -- in 1997 and 2003<br />
and 2011.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 463
<strong>Austin</strong> School District Earns ASBO <strong>Budget</strong> Award<br />
For a second consecutive year, The Association of School Business <strong>Official</strong>s<br />
International (ASBO) has awarded the <strong>Austin</strong> School District its Meritorious<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> Award (MBA) for excellence in budget presentation of the 2011-12<br />
<strong>Budget</strong>. To earn this award, the District submitted its 2011-12 <strong>Budget</strong> for a<br />
rigorous review based on ASBO’s stringent criteria. The MBA criteria guide school<br />
business officials toward a quality school budget presentation by enhancing<br />
officials’ skill in developing, analyzing, and presenting a school district budget.<br />
The Association of School Business <strong>Official</strong>s International, founded in 1910, is a professional association<br />
of more than 5,000 members that provides programs and services to promote the highest standards of<br />
school business management practices, professional growth, and the effective use of educational<br />
resources. This was the second time the district participated and submitted its budget.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> Earns Nationally Recognized GFOA <strong>Budget</strong> Award<br />
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada<br />
(GFOA) has awarded the <strong>Austin</strong> School District its Distinguished <strong>Budget</strong><br />
Presentation Award for 2011-12. To receive the budget award, A<strong>ISD</strong> had to satisfy<br />
nationally recognized guidelines for effective budget presentation. These<br />
guidelines are designed to assess how well an entity's budget serves as a policy<br />
document, a financial plan, an operations guide, and a communications device.<br />
<strong>Budget</strong> documents must be rated "proficient" in all four categories, and in the 14<br />
mandatory criteria within those categories, to receive the award.<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Earns Highest Award from Texas Comptroller for Financial Transparency<br />
November 2, 2011 - <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District earned the 2011 Gold Leadership Circle Award<br />
for a second year in a row from the Texas Comptroller. The Gold Leadership Circle Award is presented to<br />
cities, counties and school districts which meet the highest standard for financial transparency online.<br />
A government agency can initially be considered for the award if three key<br />
financial documents are posted online. Those documents are the annual budget,<br />
annual financial report and the check register. Other factors considered in the<br />
Gold Leadership Circle Award include sharing information in a user-friendly<br />
format that provides ease of access and providing consistent information of<br />
spending.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 464
A<strong>ISD</strong> Named Top Performing District by the Council of the Great City Schools<br />
May 8, 2012 - The <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District has earned the Top Performing<br />
District award for its management of business operations services in 2011 from the<br />
Council of the Great City Schools. This recognition is based on key performance<br />
measures that demonstrate efficient and effective use of resources in the critical<br />
areas of child nutrition, maintenance and operations, safety and security and student<br />
transportation.<br />
"We are honored by the recognition from a national organization<br />
that represents the needs of urban public schools," Lawrence<br />
Fryer, Chief Operations Officer, said. "Our goal is to ensure every<br />
department within the district is managed efficiently, so we can deliver the best<br />
possible education to our students."<br />
The Council of the Great City Schools is the only national organization exclusively representing the needs<br />
of urban public schools. The organization, which comprises 67 large-city school districts, provides a<br />
network of resources to collectively address challenges of urban districts.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Recognized Nationally for Use of Green Power<br />
May 29, 2012 - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ranks A<strong>ISD</strong> second in the nation in the<br />
use of green power among K-12 school districts. The EPA produces a list annually of the Top 20 K-12<br />
schools. The Top 20 K-12 Schools list represents the largest purchasers<br />
among K-12 school partners within the Green Power Partnership. The<br />
combined green power purchases of these organizations amounts to<br />
more than 220 million kilowatt-hours of green power annually, which is<br />
the equivalent amount of electricity needed to power more than 19,000<br />
average American homes each year. Locally, the District also achieved<br />
the <strong>Austin</strong> Energy Green Building Program's five-star rating in the construction of the McCallum Arts<br />
Center.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 465
Demographical & Statistical<br />
Table 135<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Population Analysis<br />
United States 2<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> 1<br />
Travis County 2<br />
Texas 2<br />
Fire Protection 1 Recreation 1<br />
Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage<br />
Year Population Change Population Change Population Change Population Change<br />
1940 87,930 -- 111,053 -- 6,414,824 -- 132,165,000 --<br />
1950 132,459 50.64% 160,980 44.96% 7,711,194 20.21% 151,326,000 14.50%<br />
1960 186,545 40.83% 212,136 31.78% 9,579,677 24.23% 179,323,000 18.50%<br />
1970 253,539 35.91% 295,516 39.30% 11,198,655 16.90% 203,302,000 13.37%<br />
1980 345,496 36.27% 419,573 41.98% 14,228,383 27.05% 222,110,000 9.25%<br />
1985 406,584 17.68% 527,120 25.63% 16,370,000 15.05% 238,740,000 7.49%<br />
1990 450,830 10.88% 576,407 9.35% 16,986,510 3.77% 249,632,692 4.56%<br />
1995 523,352 16.09% 656,979 13.98% 18,724,000 10.23% 262,755,000 5.26%<br />
2000 628,667 20.12% 749,426 14.07% 20,044,141 7.05% 272,690,813 3.78%<br />
2005 695,881 10.69% 906,919 21.02% 22,678,651 13.14% 295,734,134 8.45%<br />
2006 714,237 2.64% 921,006 1.55% 23,507,783 3.66% 299,398,484 1.24%<br />
2007 732,381 2.54% 974,365 5.79% 23,904,380 1.69% 301,621,157 0.74%<br />
2008 746,105 1.87% 998,543 2.48% 24,326,974 1.77% 304,059,724 0.81%<br />
2009 770,296 3.24% 1,026,158 2.77% 24,782,302 1.87% 307,006,550 0.97%<br />
2010 778,560 1.07% 1,024,266 -0.18% 25,145,561 1.47% 308,745,538 0.57%<br />
2011 805,662 3.48% 1,024,266 * 0.00% 25,674,681 2.10% 311,591,917 0.92%<br />
Number of Stations 45 District Parks 13<br />
Number of Employees 3 1,151 Metropolitan Parks 12<br />
Number of Fire Emergency Responses 81,982 Natural Preserves 15<br />
Number of Fire Responses 3,208 Neighborhood Parks 79<br />
Number of Employees per 1 Special Parks (museums and miscellaneous) 39<br />
Police Protection 1<br />
1,000 Population 5 Open Fields 103<br />
Veloway<br />
3 miles<br />
Hike and Bike Trails<br />
199 miles<br />
Greenbelts 40<br />
Number of Employees 4 2,344<br />
Number of Law Offenses 146,277<br />
Number of Arrests 42,220 Golf Courses 5<br />
Patrol Units 349 Swimming Pools 52<br />
Number of Employees per 3 Athletic Fields 174<br />
1,000 Population 5 Softball Fields 32<br />
Tennis Courts 110<br />
Library 1<br />
Central and Branch Libraries 23 Recreation Centers 20<br />
Volumes in Collection 1,454,103 Youth Entertainment Complex 1<br />
Library Volumes Borrowed 4,663,583 Senior Activity Centers 3<br />
Registered Library Borrowers 519,788<br />
1. Source - City of <strong>Austin</strong> Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended September 30, 2011, unless noted otherwise.<br />
2. Source - U.S. Bureau of the Census * 2011 Population for Travis County is unavailable<br />
3. Source - City of <strong>Austin</strong> Fire Department<br />
4. Source - City of <strong>Austin</strong> Police Department<br />
5. Represents sworn and civilian employees<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 466
Table 136<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Economic and Growth Indicators<br />
Area of<br />
Effective Buying<br />
Incorporation 1 Utility Connection Income (EBI) 1<br />
Median<br />
Household<br />
Per<br />
Capita<br />
Year Sq. Miles Population Electric 1 Water 2 Gas 3 EBI EBI<br />
$ $<br />
2002 273.10 671,044 359,358 182,977 193,278 47,089 25,109<br />
2003 275.58 674,719 363,377 184,659 199,042 41,909 22,420<br />
2004 290.75 683,551 369,458 188,441 203,966 39,227 21,487<br />
2005 293.57 695,881 372,735 192,511 207,686 40,335 21,938<br />
2006 296.25 714,237 380,696 197,511 218,500 40,888 35,413<br />
2007 297.00 732,381 388,626 199,671 222,000 42,263 38,243<br />
2008 298.00 746,105 396,791 206,695 219,470 46,340 39,010<br />
2009 302.00 770,296 407,926 208,487 223,048 47,520 38,518<br />
2010 306.00 778,560 413,870 214,470 225,321 48,460 35,798<br />
2011 308.00 805,662 417,865 212,754 228,213 46,689 38,484<br />
2002-2011<br />
Change 12.05% 16.02% 15.17% 17.21% 16.58% 2.91% 42.57%<br />
Building Permits 4 <strong>Austin</strong> Home Sales 5<br />
Federal,<br />
State and Dollar Average Number of<br />
Year Municipal Taxable Total Volume Sale Price Homes Sold<br />
$ $ $ $ $<br />
2002 38,727,017 1,261,868,130 1,300,595,147 3,695,947,381 197,500 18,716<br />
2003 17,084,652 1,189,489,091 1,206,573,743 3,899,018,519 197,000 19,793<br />
2004 20,533,975 1,280,385,298 1,300,919,273 4,487,464,528 198,900 22,567<br />
2005 40,484,950 1,405,871,887 1,446,356,837 5,660,934,916 210,400 26,905<br />
2006 16,526,040 2,353,171,746 2,369,697,786 6,961,725,607 229,900 30,284<br />
2007 14,272,851 2,529,648,915 2,543,921,766 6,910,296,291 246,400 28,046<br />
2008 4,099,000 1,468,699,801 1,472,798,801 5,469,588,055 243,800 22,436<br />
2009 6,988,999 834,498,480 841,487,479 4,630,238,843 236,225 19,511<br />
2010 4,252,978 1,413,989,503 1,418,242,481 4,905,945,574 246,900 19,870<br />
2011 2,812,350 745,909,589 748,721,939 5,335,896,252 251,600 21,204<br />
2002-2011<br />
Change -92.74% -40.89% -42.43% 44.37% 27.39% 13.29%<br />
1. Source -City Demographer, City of <strong>Austin</strong>, Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Dept. in the City of <strong>Austin</strong> Comprehensive Annual<br />
Financial Report for Year ended September 30, 2011<br />
2. Source - <strong>Austin</strong> Energy<br />
3. Source - Texas Gas Service<br />
4. Source -City of <strong>Austin</strong> Planning & Development Review Department<br />
5. Source: Texas A&M University Real Estate Center, from the <strong>Austin</strong> Chamber of Commerce<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN . September 2012 467
Table 137<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Employment by Industry in the <strong>Austin</strong> Metropolitan Statistical Area 1<br />
Industry Classification<br />
Number<br />
% of<br />
Total<br />
Number<br />
% of<br />
Total<br />
Number<br />
% of<br />
Total<br />
Number<br />
% of<br />
Total<br />
Manufacturing 51,100 6.33 84,000 12.30 48,200 12.20 31,014 12.80<br />
Government 169,900 21.06 137,100 20.10 112,700 28.50 78,263 32.30<br />
Trade, Transportation & Utilities 2 139,700 17.32 116,000 17.00 60,400 15.30 59,121 24.40<br />
Services and Miscellaneous 361,600 44.81 267,100 39.10 136,100 34.40 44,826 18.50<br />
Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 45,000 5.58 35,400 5.20 24,700 6.20 14,296 5.90<br />
Contract Construction 3 35,550 4.41 26,500 3.90 7,400 1.90 14,053 5.80<br />
Natural Resources and Mining 3 3,950 0.49 16,200 2.40 6,200 1.60 727 0.30<br />
Totals 806,800 100.00 682,300 100.0 395,700 100.0 242,300 100.0<br />
1 <strong>Austin</strong>-Round Rock MSA includes Travis, Bastrop, Caldwell, Hays and Williamson counties.<br />
2 Trade, transportation and utilities have been reported together since 2003; reported numbers from 1990 have been<br />
adjusted.<br />
3 2011 figures for Contract Construction and Natural Resources and Mining are estimates provided by TWC based on<br />
a reported combined total.<br />
Source: Texas Workforce Commission<br />
Employer<br />
Table 138<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Top Ten Employers in <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Product or Service<br />
Number of<br />
Employees 4<br />
% of<br />
Total 5<br />
State Government<br />
The University of Texas at <strong>Austin</strong><br />
Dell Computer Corporation<br />
City of <strong>Austin</strong><br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Seton Healthcare Network<br />
Federal Government<br />
HEB<br />
St. David's Healthcare Partnership<br />
IBM Corporation<br />
Government<br />
Education<br />
Computers<br />
Government<br />
Education<br />
Healthcare<br />
Government<br />
Grocer Retail/Distribution<br />
Healthcare<br />
Computers<br />
37,818 4.69<br />
22,956 2.85<br />
14,000 1.74<br />
11,997 1.49<br />
11,736 1.36<br />
11,601 1.45<br />
11,000 1.27<br />
10,263 1.44<br />
7,100 0.77<br />
6,239 0.88<br />
144,710 17.94<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 468
Percent<br />
Table 139<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
Urban and National Comparison of Unemployment Rate 2008-2012<br />
Unemployment Rate Comparison<br />
11.0<br />
10.0<br />
9.0<br />
8.0<br />
7.0<br />
6.0<br />
5.0<br />
4.0<br />
3.0<br />
2.0<br />
1.0<br />
0.0<br />
Arlington<br />
<strong>Austin</strong><br />
Dallas<br />
Fort<br />
Worth<br />
Harris<br />
County<br />
Houston<br />
San<br />
Antonio<br />
United<br />
States<br />
City/County<br />
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008<br />
City 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />
<strong>Austin</strong> 3.6 6.0 6.5 6.3 5.5<br />
Arlington 4.0 6.6 7.8 7.6 6.5<br />
Dallas 4.8 7.7 8.9 8.6 7.6<br />
Fort Worth 4.6 7.3 8.4 8.4 7.1<br />
Harris County 4.2 6.7 8.6 8.3 7.1<br />
Houston 4.2 6.5 8.2 8.0 7.1<br />
San Antonio 3.9 5.9 6.8 7.0 6.6<br />
United States 5.2 9.0 10.2 9.2 8.4<br />
Source: Texas Workforce Commission Labor Market Information Data. Figures are for March<br />
of each year represented.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 469
This Page Intentionally Left Blank<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 470
Glossary<br />
This glossary contains definitions of terms used in this guide and such additional terms as seem<br />
necessary to common understanding concerning financial accounting procedure for the school district.<br />
Several terms which are not primarily financial accounting terms, have been included because of their<br />
significance for school financial accounting.<br />
AAPSA. <strong>Austin</strong> Association of Public School Administrators<br />
ACADEMICALLY ACCEPTABLE. State recognition given to schools meeting each standard:<br />
Reading/ELA –50%, Writing-50%, Social Studies-50%, Mathematics-35%, Science-25% or meets<br />
required improvement.<br />
ACADEMICALLY EXEMPLARY. State recognition given to school that meets 90% standard for each<br />
subject.<br />
ACADEMICALLY RECOGNIZED. State recognition given to schools that have a passing rate of at least<br />
70% for each subject or meets 65% floor and required improvement.<br />
ACADEMICALLY UNACCEPTABLE. State recognition given to schools meeting each standard:<br />
Reading/ELA –50%, Writing-50%, Social Studies-50%, Mathematics-35%, Science-25% or meets<br />
required improvement.<br />
ACC. <strong>Austin</strong> Community College<br />
ACCELERATED EDUCATION PROGRAM. This term is used to record costs incurred to use<br />
instructional strategies to provide services in addition to those provided at the basic level of instruction,<br />
thereby increasing the amount and quality of instructional time for students in such at-risk situation.<br />
ACCESS. <strong>Austin</strong> Community Collaboration to Enhance Student Success funded by the Safe School<br />
Healthy Student Grant.<br />
ACES. Alternative Center for Elementary Students<br />
ACCOUNT. A descriptive heading under which are recorded financial transactions that are similar in<br />
terms of a given frame of reference, such as fund, function, or object.<br />
ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING. A method of accounting that recognizes the financial effect of<br />
transactions, events, and interfund activities when they occur, regardless of the timing of related cash<br />
flows.<br />
ADA. Students in ‘Average Daily Attendance’.<br />
ADMINISTRATION. Those activities which have as their purpose the general regulation, direction, and<br />
control of the affairs of the local education agency that are system-wide and not confined to one school,<br />
subject, or narrow phase of school activity.<br />
ADVANCE. Access Decide Visit Apply Now for Your College Education<br />
AEA. Alternative Education Accountability<br />
AEC. Alternative Education Campuses<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 471
Glossary<br />
AEGBP. <strong>Austin</strong> Energy’s Green Building Program<br />
AEIS. Academic Excellence Indicator System<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong>. <strong>Austin</strong> Independent School District<br />
ALC. Alternative Learning Center<br />
AIMS. <strong>Austin</strong> Instructional Management System<br />
ALLOCATION. A part of a lump sum appropriation, which is designated for expenditure by specific<br />
organization units and/or for special purposes, activities, or objects.<br />
AMENDED BUDGET. Adopted budget plus/minus budget revisions.<br />
AP. Advance Placement<br />
APGs. Advanced Planning Guides<br />
APIE. <strong>Austin</strong> Partners In Education<br />
APPRAISE. To make an estimate of value, particularly of the value of property. If the property is valued<br />
for purposes of taxation, the less-inclusive term “assess is substituted for the above term.<br />
APPROPRIATION ACCOUNT. A budgetary account set up to record specific authorization to spend.<br />
The account is credited with original and any supplemental appropriations and is charged with<br />
expenditures and encumbrances.<br />
ARD. Admission, Review and Dismissal<br />
ARRA. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act<br />
ASSESSED VALUATION. A valuation set upon real estate or other property by a government as a basis<br />
for levying taxes.<br />
AU. Academically Unacceptable Campuses<br />
AVID. Advanced Via Individual Determination<br />
AYP. Adequate Yearly Progress<br />
BASIC EDUCATION PROGRAM. This term is used to identify cost for expenditure function 11<br />
(instruction) and other expenditure functions for which operational costs can be specifically identified<br />
with the regular instructional program.<br />
BEST. Program promoting Belief in Our Students, Effort Creates Ability, Supporting Families and<br />
Targeting College.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 472
Glossary<br />
BILINGUAL/ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM. This term is used to record cost<br />
incurred to evaluate, place and provide education and/or other services that are intended to make the<br />
students proficient in the English language, primary language literacy, composition and academic<br />
language related to required courses.<br />
BOARD OF EDUCATION. The elected or appointed body, which has been created according to state<br />
law and vested with responsibilities for education activities in a given geographic area.<br />
BOND. A written promise to pay a specified sum of money, called the face value, at a fixed time in the<br />
future, called the date of maturity, and carrying interest at a fixed rate, usually payable periodically.<br />
BONDED DEBT. The part of the school district debt, which is covered by outstanding bonds of the<br />
district. Sometimes called “Funded Debt or Bonded Indebtedness”.<br />
BONDS AUTHORIZED AND UNISSUED. Bonds, which have been legally authorized but not, issued,<br />
and which can be issued and sold without further authorization.<br />
BONDS ISSUED. Bonds sold.<br />
BUDGET. A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given<br />
period or purpose and the proposed means of financing them.<br />
BUDGET/TASK FORCE. Members appointed by the Superintendent who meet during the budget<br />
development process to review and comment on the proposed budget and its priorities.<br />
BUDGETARY ACCOUNTS. Special accounts used to achieve budgetary integration, but not reported in<br />
the general-purpose external statements. The most common budgetary accounts are estimated<br />
revenues, appropriations, budgetary fund balance and encumbrances.<br />
CAC. Carruth Administration Center<br />
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND. Fund type used to account for financial resources to be used for the<br />
acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds and<br />
trust funds).<br />
CAPITAL OUTLAY. Expenditures, which result in the acquisition of or addition to, fixed assets.<br />
CATE. Career and Technology Education<br />
CATCH. Coordinated Approach to Child Health<br />
CBDNA. College Band Directors National Association<br />
CCPP. College and Career Preparatory Program<br />
CCRS. Texas College and Readiness Standards<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 473
Glossary<br />
CHAPTER 41 DISTRICT. When property wealth exceeds $319,500 per WADA, forcing a school district<br />
to send part of its local tax revenue to the state.<br />
CIP. Continuous Improvement Plan<br />
COCURRICULAR ACTIVITIES. Direct and personal services for public school pupil, such as<br />
interscholastic athletics, entertainments, publications, clubs, band, and orchestra that are managed or<br />
operated by the student body under the guidance and direction of an adult, and are not part of the<br />
regular instruction program.<br />
COIN. A web program for students to create an individual college and career plan.<br />
COMMUNITY SERVICES. Those services provided for the community as a whole or some segment of<br />
the community and which are not restricted to the public schools or adult education programs.<br />
CONTRACTED SERVICES. Labor, material and other costs for services rendered by personnel who are<br />
not on the payroll of the school district.<br />
CRT. Criterion-Referenced Test<br />
CTE. Career and Technology Education<br />
CURRENT. Refers to the fiscal year in progress.<br />
CURRENT BUDGET. The annual budget prepared for and effective during the present fiscal year.<br />
CURRENT YEAR’S TAX LEVY. Taxes levied for the current fiscal period.<br />
DAC. District Advisory Council<br />
DAEP. District Alternative Education Program<br />
DEBT. An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services.<br />
DEBT SERVICE FUND. Governmental fund type used to account for the accumulation of resources for,<br />
and the payment of, general long-term debt principal and interest.<br />
DEFICIT. The excess of the obligations of a fund over the fund’s resources.<br />
DELINQUENT TAXES. Taxes remaining unpaid on and after the date on which they become delinquent.<br />
DPE. Department of Program Evaluation<br />
EDUCATION AUSTIN. Teacher’s Union Organization for <strong>Austin</strong> teachers.<br />
EL. Executive Limitations<br />
ELA . English Language Arts<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 474
Glossary<br />
ELDA. English Language Development Academy<br />
ELEVAR. English Language Learner Versed in Academic Rigor<br />
ELLs. English Language Learners<br />
ELLA. The English Language and Literacy Academy<br />
ELPS. English Language Proficiency Standards<br />
EMT. Emergency Medical Technician<br />
ENCUMBRANCES. Encumbrance accounting under which purchase orders, contracts and other<br />
commitments are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation is used in all<br />
Governmental Fund types. Since appropriations lapse at year-end, outstanding encumbrances are<br />
reappropriated in the subsequent fiscal year’s budget to provide for the liquidation of the prior<br />
commitments.<br />
ENTERPRISE FUND. Proprietary fund type used to report an activity for which a fee is charge to<br />
external users for good or services.<br />
EQUIPMENT. Those moveable items used for school operation that are of a non-expendable and<br />
mechanical nature that have a unit cost of > $5000 including telephone and communication systems,<br />
mainframe and minicomputers, high capacity copiers and printing machines.<br />
ESL. English Second Language<br />
EXEMPLARY. State recognition given to school that meets 90% standard for each subject.<br />
EXPENDITURES PER STUDENT. Current expenditures for a given period of time divided by a pupil unit<br />
of measure (total number of students enrolled).<br />
FAR. Financial Accountability System Resource Guide<br />
FASB. Financial Accounting Standards Board<br />
FIDUCIARY FUNDS. Funds used to report assets held in a trustee or agency capacity for others and<br />
which therefore cannot be used to support the government’s own programs. The fiduciary fund category<br />
at A<strong>ISD</strong> includes agency funds.<br />
FIRST. Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas<br />
FISCAL YEAR. A twelve-month period of time to which the annual budget applies and at the end of<br />
which the district determines its financial position and the results of its operations; for example,<br />
September 1 through August 31.<br />
FIXED ASSETS. Land, buildings and equipment which the district intends to hold or continue to use over<br />
a long period of time<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 475
Glossary<br />
FOOD SERVICE SUMMER FEEDING PROGRAM FUND.<br />
Accounts for funds received from the Department of Human Services that are awarded for meals<br />
provided to the community based on the average number of daily participants. This fund should be used<br />
regardless of whether a school district’s National School Breakfast and Lunch Program is accounted for<br />
in the General Fund (101), Special Revenue Funds (240 and 242), or an Enterprise Fund (701).<br />
FTF. First Things First<br />
FUNCTION. As applied to expenditures, this term has reference to an activity or service aimed at<br />
accomplishing a certain purpose or end; for example, Instruction, Instructional Administration, Plant<br />
Maintenance and Operations.<br />
FUND. A sum of money or other resources set aside for specific activities of a school district. The fund<br />
accounts constitute a complete entity and all of the financial transactions for the particular fund are<br />
recorded therein.<br />
FUND BALANCE. The difference between assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund.<br />
GAAP. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles<br />
GAATN. Greater <strong>Austin</strong> Area Telecommunications Network<br />
GASB. Governmental Accounting Standard Board<br />
GEAR UP. Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs<br />
GED. General Education Development, usually used in term of GED tests to measure the outcome of a<br />
high school education.<br />
GENERAL FUND. The general fund is one of five governmental fund types and typically serves as the<br />
chief operating fund of a government. The general fund is used to account for all financial resources<br />
except those required to be accounted for in another fund.<br />
GFOA. Government Finance Officers Association<br />
GIFTED & TALENTED PROGRAM. This term is used to identify cost for expenditure function 11 and<br />
other applicable expenditure functions for academic programs established for students who have been<br />
identified as functioning at a higher intellectual plane and/or possessing talents exceeding those<br />
normally expended from the majority of the student population.<br />
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS. Funds generally used to account for tax-supported activities. There are<br />
different types of governmental funds: the general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds,<br />
capital project funds, and permanent funds.<br />
GPA. Gold Performance Acknowledgements<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 476
Glossary<br />
GRANT. A contribution, either money or material goods, made by one governmental unit to another unit<br />
and for which the contributing unit expects no repayment. Grants may be for specific or general<br />
purposes.<br />
HMO-HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION. A healthcare system that assumes or shares both the<br />
financial risk and the delivery risks associated with providing comprehensive medical services to a<br />
voluntarily enrolled population in a particular geographic area, usually in return for a fixed, prepaid fee.<br />
HR. Human Resources<br />
HVAC. Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning<br />
IACP. Individual Academic Career Plan<br />
IB. International Baccalaureate<br />
IDM. Identity Management and Security Infrastructure Enhancement System<br />
IEP. Individual Education Plan<br />
IHS. International High School<br />
INSTRUCTION. The activities dealing directly with the teaching of students or improving the quality of<br />
teaching.<br />
INTEREST. A fee charged a borrower for the use of money.<br />
INTEREST & SINKING (I & S). District income from local real and personal property taxes that is used<br />
for the Debt Service Fund.<br />
INVENTORY. Inventory is stated at cost using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory in the General<br />
Fund consists of expendable parts and supplies. The costs are recorded as expenditures at the time<br />
individual inventory items are distributed to the various user locations.<br />
IPGs. Instructional Planning Guides<br />
ISTE. The International Society for Technology Education<br />
ITBS. Iowa Test of Basic Skills<br />
ITED. Iowa Test of Educational Development<br />
IWC. International Welcome Center<br />
JJAEP. Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program<br />
LAT. Linguistically Accommodated Test<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 477
Glossary<br />
LDC. Leadership Development Academy<br />
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN. The excess of the amount of debt legally authorized over the amount of debt<br />
outstanding.<br />
LEP. Limited English Proficient<br />
LEVY. To impose taxes or special assessments.<br />
LPAS. Language Proficiency Assessment System<br />
LST. Local Support Team<br />
MAC. Medicaid Administrative Claiming Program<br />
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS (M&O). District income from local and personal property taxes that is<br />
used for the General Fund.<br />
MD&D. Management’s Discussion and Analysis<br />
MIS. Department of Management Information Systems<br />
MLEB. Middle Level Education Plan<br />
MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS OF ACCOUNTING. Basis of accounting used in conjunction with the<br />
current financial resources measurement focus that modifies the accrual basis of accounting in two<br />
important ways 1) revenues are not recognized until they are measurable and available, and 2)<br />
expenditures are recognized in the period in which governments in general normally liquidate the related<br />
liability rather than when that liability is first incurred (if earlier).<br />
MPGs. Magnet Planning Guides<br />
MSA. Metropolitan Statistical Area<br />
NCAA. National Collegiate Athletic Association<br />
NCEA. National Center for Educational Achievement<br />
NCLB. No Child Left Behind<br />
NETS. National Educational Technology Standards<br />
NEW POSITION REQUESTS. Non-existing personnel position that requested to be added for the next<br />
fiscal year.<br />
NI. Needs Improvements Campuses<br />
NMSQT. National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 478
Glossary<br />
NSLP. National School Lunch Program<br />
NSS. Network Systems and Support<br />
OBE. Office of Bilingual Education<br />
OBJECT. A term used in connection with the classification of expenditures. The article purchased or the<br />
service obtained, rather than the purpose for which the article or service was purchased or obtained.<br />
PAPA. Parenting and Parental Awareness<br />
PAYROLL. A list of individual employees entitled to pay, with the amounts due to each for personal<br />
services rendered.<br />
PBS. Positive Behavior Support<br />
PBMAS. Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System<br />
PEIMS. Public Education Information Management System is a data collection system for all public<br />
school districts in Texas.<br />
PERSONNEL, INSTRUCTIONAL. Those who render services dealing directly with the instruction of<br />
pupils including classroom teachers, teacher’s aides, classroom assistants and graders.<br />
PERSONNEL, PROFESSIONAL. Teachers, principals, assistant principals, librarians, counselors,<br />
administrators, etc. that is not eligible for overtime pay.<br />
PERSONNEL, SUPPORT. Secretaries, clerks, teacher aides, custodian and campus monitors who are<br />
eligible for overtime pay.<br />
PET. Personal Identification Database Enrollment Tracking System<br />
PLANT MAINTENANCE. Those activities which are concerned with keeping the grounds, buildings, and<br />
other equipment at their original condition or completeness or efficiency, either through repairs or by<br />
replacements of property.<br />
POL. Principles of Learning<br />
PPCD. Programs for Children with Disabilities<br />
PREFERRED PROVIDER ORGANIZATION (PPO). A healthcare benefit arrangement designed to<br />
supply services at a discounted cost by providing incentives for members to use designated healthcare<br />
providers (who contract with the PPO at a discount), but which also provides coverage for services<br />
rendered by healthcare providers who are not part of the PPO network.<br />
PRELIMINARY TAX VALUES. Appraisal used to project the district’s revenue from property taxes before<br />
completion of the certified tax roll.<br />
PRIDE. Preparing Responsible Individuals Dedicated to Excellence<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 479
Glossary<br />
PRINCIPAL OF BONDS. The face value of bonds.<br />
PROGRAM. The definition of an effort to accomplish a specific object or objectives consistent with funds<br />
or resources available. <strong>Budget</strong>s and actual revenue and expenditure records may be maintained per<br />
program.<br />
PROPRIETARY FUNDS. Funds that focus on the determination of operating income, changes in net<br />
assets (or cost recovery), financial position, and cash flows. There are two different types of proprietary<br />
funds: enterprise funds and internal service funds.<br />
PSAT. Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test<br />
PTA. Parent Teacher Association<br />
QZAB. Qualified Zone Academic Bonds<br />
QTEL. Quality Teaching for English Learners<br />
READ 180. A reading intervention program with a computer software interactive compontent.<br />
RECOGNIZED. State recognition given to schools that have a passing rate of at least 70% for each<br />
subject or meets 65% floor and required improvement.<br />
REVENUE. The yield of taxes, tuition, interest earnings, and other monetary resources that the District<br />
collects and receives into the treasury for public use. For those revenues which are recorded on the<br />
accrual basis, this term designates additions to assets which (a) do not increase any liability; (b) do not<br />
represent the recovery of an expenditure; (c) do not represent contributions of fund capital in enterprise<br />
and internal service funds. The same definition applies to those cases where revenue are recorded on<br />
the modified accrual or cash basis, except that additions would be partially or entirely to cash.<br />
RESERVED FUND BALANCE. The portion of a governmental fund’s net assets that is not available for<br />
appropriation.<br />
ROTC. Army Reserve Officer Training Corp<br />
RtI. Response to Intervention<br />
SALARY. The total amount regularly paid or stipulated to be paid to an individual, before deductions, for<br />
personal services rendered while on the school district payroll.<br />
SAS. Statistical Analysis Software<br />
SASI. School Administrative Student Information<br />
SCHOOL, ELEMENTARY. A school classified as elementary by State and local practice and composed<br />
of grades kindergarten through fifth.<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 480
Glossary<br />
SCHOOL, SECONDARY. A school comprised of students beginning with the next grade following the<br />
elementary school and ending with or below grade 12, including 6 th grade centers, middle schools, high<br />
schools and vocational or trade high schools.<br />
SCHOOL, PRINCIPAL. The administrative head of a school to who has been delegated the major<br />
responsibility for the coordination and supervision of the activities of the school.<br />
SDAA II. State Developed Alternative Assessment II<br />
SECAC. Special Education Citizen’s Advisory Committee<br />
SERIAL BONDS. A bond whose principal is to be repaid in periodic installments over the life of the<br />
issue.<br />
SHAC. School Health Advisory Council<br />
SHARS. School Health and Related Services<br />
SIOP. Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol<br />
SMART. Science Math and Reading Tutors<br />
SPAM. The term spam refers to unsolicited commercial e-mail.<br />
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM. This term is used to identify cost for expenditure functions for which<br />
costs can be specifically identified with instruction and related services for those programs for<br />
handicapped children approved by the Texas Education Agency.<br />
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS. Account for certain revenues derived from the state and federal<br />
governments, which are required to finance particular activities. These funds provide enrichment<br />
programs, testing of pilot programs and enhance programs not provided by the general operating<br />
revenues.<br />
SPECIAL SCHOOL. A school that serves a specific, targeted student population.<br />
SREB. Southern Regional Education Board<br />
STATE AID FOR EDUCATION. Any grant made by a State government for the support of education.<br />
SUPPLY. A material item of an expendable nature that is consumed, worn out, or deteriorated in use.<br />
T-STEM. Texas Science, Technology, Engineering and Math.<br />
TAAS (TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC SKILLS). Students in Texas public schools in grades 3-8<br />
and 10 take this criterion-referenced test during the spring semester of each school year. All portions of<br />
the exam must be passed prior to graduation.<br />
TAC. Texas Administrative Code<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 481
Glossary<br />
TAKS (TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS). Students in Texas public schools in<br />
grades 3-8 and 10 take this criterion-referenced test during the spring semester of each school year. All<br />
portions of the exam must be passed prior to graduation.<br />
TAX RATE. Total tax rate is set by the Board of Trustees and is made up of two components:<br />
maintenance and operating and debt service rates. It is the amount levied for each $100 of assessed<br />
valuation.<br />
TAXES. Compulsory charges levied by a governmental unit for the purpose of financing services<br />
performed for the common benefit.<br />
TCAD. Travis County Appraisal District<br />
TEA. Texas Education Agency<br />
TEC. Texas Education Code<br />
TELPAS. Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System<br />
TEKS. Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills<br />
TLA. Technology Literacy Assessments<br />
TMEA. Texas Music Educators Association<br />
TREx. Texas Record Exchange<br />
TRS. Teacher Retirement System of Texas<br />
TPRI. Texas Primary Reading Inventory<br />
UCLA. University of California, Los Angeles<br />
USDE. United States Department of Education<br />
UIL. University Interscholastic League<br />
USDA. United States Department of Agriculture<br />
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE. The difference between the unreserved fund balance and the<br />
designated unreserved fund balance. This portion of the fund balance is usually available to finance<br />
monthly operating expenditures.<br />
UNRESERVED DESIGNATED FUND BALANCE. The portion of the fund balance identified by<br />
management to reflect tentative plans or commitments of government resources.<br />
VCT. Vinyl Composition Tile<br />
VOC. Volatile Organic Compounds<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 482
Glossary<br />
VOCATIONAL PROGRAM. This term is used to identify costs for expenditure 11 and other expenditure<br />
functions for which costs can be specifically identified with those vocational education programs<br />
approved by the Texas Education Agency.<br />
WADA. Weighted Average Daily Attendance, an adjusted student count that compensates for student<br />
and district characteristics as defined by statute. Students with special education needs, for example,<br />
are ‘weighted’ by a factor ranging from 1.1 to 5.0 times the ‘regular’ program weight in order to fund their<br />
special needs.<br />
WOW. Working Out for Wellness<br />
A<strong>ISD</strong> <strong>FY2013</strong> OFFICIAL BUDGET PLAN .<br />
September<br />
2012 483
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
<strong>FY2013</strong><br />
OFFICIAL BUDGET<br />
Read and download a copy of the <strong>FY2013</strong> <strong>Official</strong> <strong>Budget</strong> at<br />
www.austinisd.org/publications<br />
AUSTIN Independent School District