30.09.2014 Views

Made In Sheffield - Now Then

Made In Sheffield - Now Then

Made In Sheffield - Now Then

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Technology is not really my thing.<br />

Getting to grips with it quickly does not<br />

come particularly naturally to me. This is<br />

a pity because it features rather heavily in<br />

my subject - Broadcast Journalism. And<br />

technology is playing an increasingly<br />

important role for reporters.<br />

Where there used to be television reporters there are now<br />

multi-skilled ‘video-journalists’ – people who no longer work<br />

in small teams, but who are expected to do the reporting,<br />

filming and editing on their own. The main reason for this<br />

development, of course, is financial. It is cheaper to get<br />

one person to do the whole lot than pay expensive crews<br />

for their time. But who knows, reporters having to do three<br />

jobs rolled into one on a day to day basis may simply lead<br />

to burn-out. Quality of television news output may suffer<br />

(some would say it already has) and ultimately television<br />

executives may be forced to go full circle and re-employ all<br />

those cameramen and editors they laid off.<br />

New technology is everywhere. And it seems to come<br />

so naturally to young people. The younger they are the<br />

more affinity they seem to have with all things technical.<br />

My six year old daughter Nikki knows more about how<br />

to use my computer, mobile phone and iPod than I do!<br />

But, despite my rather difficult personal relationship with<br />

new technology, I absolutely believe that it should be<br />

embraced. It has an increasingly crucial place in Higher<br />

Education teaching which cannot and must not be ignored<br />

by academics. Here’s an example of how new technology<br />

has helped improve one of my courses.<br />

My students have to learn how to use a particular radio<br />

computer programme to write news scripts, embed audio<br />

and compile radio news bulletins. The programme is called<br />

Burli. It is not complicated (even I managed to master it<br />

pretty quickly) but there is a fair amount to take in if you<br />

have not used a newsroom computer system before.<br />

Having to teach this programme to around 60 students,<br />

split into five groups of 12 for workshops, became a<br />

nightmare situation. Only three workshops out of the 12<br />

teaching weeks could be dedicated to learning Burli, but<br />

the students were also expected to learn how to adapt their<br />

writing for radio, record their voice, edit their material and<br />

use different types of radio news formats during their three<br />

sessions. It was a serious challenge. The students inevitably<br />

worked at varying paces. I would try to go round and talk<br />

to each person as they worked, but it was time consuming.<br />

Having to repeat this procedure five times over with the five<br />

different workshop groups felt like a very unsatisfactory use<br />

of time, both for me and for the students. A solution was<br />

needed – and fast!! What I did was to work with a colleague<br />

to come up with an online tutorial in Burli which used a type<br />

of screencast. My colleague recorded her voice giving<br />

step by step instructions, while an interactive screen would<br />

show the mouse arrow clicking on various icons in Burli to<br />

demonstrate. It was ingenious, and also very efficient on<br />

time. I now have a new system. I ask the students to prepare<br />

for each workshop session by following the relevant online<br />

Burli tutorial which can be found on our Journalism Studies<br />

intranet. It has worked wonders. They do it, they understand<br />

it, and they arrive at the workshop sessions with a basic<br />

knowledge of the programme. This enables me to dedicate<br />

the precious time we have to teaching radio journalism,<br />

rather than which buttons to press. The sessions are less<br />

pressured and students can work on exercises in their own<br />

time while getting one to one feedback from me.<br />

New technology does have to be used carefully<br />

though. PowerPoint is a good example of a technological<br />

development which can add so much to lectures when<br />

used well, but is also often abused and used very badly.<br />

Students sometimes complain that all a lecturer does is<br />

repeat what is on the slide in front of them, and in this case<br />

it is easy to see why they may prefer to simply have the<br />

notes rather than go to the lecture. I have seen lecturers<br />

‘hide’ behind their PP displays in a way that puts them<br />

into the background and their fancy slides in the forefront.<br />

The lectures which seem to have the most impact on<br />

students are those where the lecturer finds a way to interact<br />

with them, engage them, and it often has nothing to do<br />

with whether they use PP or not. <strong>In</strong> fact, students have<br />

sometimes said they find it refreshing when there is no PP<br />

used!<br />

There is no doubt that e-learning opens up access to<br />

educational opportunities to an amazing degree, but<br />

developments such as putting lecture notes up on the<br />

internet is controversial and I can understand why some<br />

academics (some of my colleagues included) are reluctant<br />

to do this. As well as copyright issues there is the worry that<br />

students will feel there is no point in attending lectures as<br />

the information is readily available. This could be seen as<br />

posing a threat to the role of a lecturer and raises questions<br />

over the purpose of teaching itself.<br />

But I do not go along with this. By allowing our lecture<br />

notes to be ‘open to all’ we are simply allowing information<br />

to be transmitted. This is only part of understanding.<br />

Understanding itself cannot be transmitted. A big part of<br />

learning is about dialogue and interaction between student<br />

and teacher. This is why, in my experience, workshop<br />

teaching in small groups is so much more effective than the<br />

traditional ‘lecture’.<br />

A colleague based in the English Literature department<br />

told me something rather interesting. A blog had been set<br />

up for his students encouraging them to write their response<br />

to certain pieces of literature. They produced some<br />

impressive writing on the web. The students were creative,<br />

free-flowing and wrote incredibly well. When asked to do<br />

something similar in the form of an essay the standard of<br />

writing went right down. The essay-writing was dry, turgid<br />

and boring!! Analyse that as you will….<br />

New technology should be tried, tested and<br />

experimented with. We, as educators, should be openminded<br />

about absolutely anything that may enhance<br />

student learning. However, judgements should be made<br />

and the fundamentals of teaching should not be forgotten.<br />

<strong>In</strong> my experience, you cannot beat face to face teaching –<br />

particularly one-to-one time with students.<br />

<strong>Now</strong>, Nikki, how do you work this DVD player?!<br />

KATIE STEWART.<br />

NEW TECHNOLOGY.<br />

BRAVE NEW WORLD.<br />

PAGe thirty-nine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!