01.11.2012 Views

The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento

The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento

The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tutoring</strong> the Know-it-All<br />

68<br />

Peggy Kincaid<br />

Spring 2011<br />

Some tutees make you wonder why they came to the center at all, because, according to them, they know<br />

everything. When you work with one of these Knows-it-Allreadies, you feel like you’re being accused of<br />

trying to deface Michelangelo’s David. Back off, you idiot tutor! Don’t touch my masterpiece with your<br />

chiseling pen. Simply step back and admire my genius. This may be an exaggeration, but if you have tried<br />

to tutor a Know-it All, you get my drift. <strong>The</strong> following stories illustrate my point.<br />

Story 1: A drop-in (fictitiously named Dejan), wanted help with a ten page paper that was due the next<br />

day which he had not yet begun to write. Sound familiar? But, to top that, he also wanted the tutor he<br />

worked with (me) to know everything about Confucius and <strong>The</strong>ravada Buddhism! And to further top<br />

that, his manner was demanding and superior. When I offered to be a sounding board and brainstorm his<br />

topic with him, Dejan said, You can’t help me. I need an expert. <strong>The</strong>n he stood up and walked away. I<br />

was not sorry to see him go. I thought for certain that the writing center had seen the last of this puzzling<br />

man. To my surprise (and, I admit, mild horror) Dejan dropped in again the next day. I was the only<br />

tutor available, so I took a deep breath and dived in. I wasn’t too worried since we only had 15 minutes in<br />

which to work, and I thought I could survive that long.<br />

Dejan told me he wanted me to check his grammar and punctuation. Knowing his paper was due that<br />

afternoon, I told him I would check his organization. (He was not an ESL student who needed line-by-line<br />

work as some do.) That was when the battle of wills began. He said, My organization is fine; I know how<br />

to write. I said I would check for organization and clarity at any rate, just in case. He conceded –<br />

reluctantly. It was obvious that taking the “dumb reader” or the supportive listener approach would not<br />

work with this writer. To my surprise, Dejan had written his ten pages without the assistance of an expert<br />

in Eastern religion and written them well. He was a very high level ESL student, and his writing was<br />

sharp and direct. Thankfully, his grammar and punctuation were nearly flawless, and I was able to get to<br />

the heart of his paper quickly.<br />

I am human enough to say that I was happy to see that Dejan had some organization issues and a few<br />

confusing sentences with structural difficulties. Although I didn’t have a specific strategy in mind at the<br />

time, I see now that I took what Muriel Harris calls the stance of “Tutor-as-diagnostician” (McAndrew<br />

and Reigstad, 113). While Dejan tapped his foot, looked frustrated and told me, over and over I know<br />

that. I don’t need your help with that, I continued to take notes. Finally, I gave him my feedback,<br />

expecting him to get angry and walk away again. To my surprise, he listened! Not only did Dejan listen,<br />

he asked me to clarify my remarks. He acknowledged that my comments were valid, thanked me and told<br />

me I was very fast. You could have knocked me over with a mechanical pencil.<br />

Story 2: A fellow tutor, Andrea, told me about her experience with Jim (also fictitiously named) -- an<br />

older man working on his MBA. Jim was highly intelligent and spoke five languages. His writing was<br />

excellent, but he kept forgetting to include articles. He was frustrated and emotionally resistant. Andrea<br />

decided to scale back and take an indirect approach. She reacted to Jim’s paper as if she was not the<br />

reader, and never expressed her own opinion or made direct statements. Andrea couched all of her<br />

comments from the perspective of a third party reader who might read the paper, taking what Muriel<br />

Harris calls the “tutor-as-commentator” approach (McAndrew and Reigstad, 113). She used comments<br />

like, If you write it this way, your reader might think . . . Gradually, Jim’s defenses went down, and he<br />

was able to see that Andrea’s comments made sense. She successfully helped him to detach himself from<br />

his work and become a reader of his own writing.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!