01.11.2012 Views

The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento

The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento

The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22<br />

Julie Colombo<br />

Spring 2011<br />

<strong>The</strong> Grammar Conundrum: Effective Ways to Incorporate Grammar Into <strong>Tutoring</strong> Sessions by<br />

Building Connections Between LOCs & HOCs<br />

As new tutors, we are introduced to a variety of theories, strategies and techniques for effective<br />

tutoring. Beginning my first semester as a tutor, I strove to understand and incorporate much of what I<br />

was learning in the internship course into my tutoring sessions, desiring to provide the best possible<br />

tutoring to students coming into the CSUS Reading & Writing Center. Yet, when I attempted to apply<br />

specific strategies relating to grammar to my tutoring sessions, I noticed a gap between the theories and<br />

techniques presented and the difficulties faced by a number of students in their writing. In the St. Martin’s<br />

Sourcebook for Writing Tutors, authors Christina Murphy and Steve Sherwood introduce several theorists<br />

and their views on the ‘grammar’ conundrum in writing centers. In Stephen M. North’s essay titled “<strong>The</strong><br />

Idea of a Writing Center,” he voices his frustration over the beliefs expressed by other academic<br />

professors and theorists who view writing centers as nothing more than “some sort of skills center, a fix-it<br />

shop” for remedial writers with “special problems in composition” (33-34). To dispel these<br />

misconceptions, North is a strong proponent of a “student-centered” approach to tutoring that takes the<br />

emphasis off lower order concerns (LOCs) or ‘local’ writing issues and puts the primary focus on higher<br />

order concerns (HOCs) or ‘global’ issues in students’ writing. In the text <strong>Tutoring</strong> Writing by Donald A.<br />

McAndrew & Thomas J. Reigstad, HOCs are described as “features of a piece of writing that exist<br />

beyond the sentence level” including: clarity, development, structure, organization, voice and tone. In<br />

contrast, LOCs are described as “features within a sentence, at the level of individual words and<br />

punctuation” that include: sentence structure, punctuation, grammar, spelling, syntax, etc. (25). Placing<br />

the emphasis on HOCs rather than LOCs, students coming into the university writing center are informed<br />

that it is not the tutor’s responsibility to focus only on grammar concerns or to edit student papers.<br />

With all of the above in mind, I made a concerted effort when I first started tutoring to focus on<br />

HOCs. But what I soon realized was that some of my tutees, whether of not their primary language was<br />

English, were struggling at the LOC level in their writing. <strong>The</strong>se students had issues with ‘grammar.’ So<br />

much so, that the grammar issues were affecting HOC concerns, inhibiting their ability to achieve clarity<br />

and focus in their writing, to cohesively organize their ideas and supportive evidence, and to present<br />

persuasive arguments. <strong>The</strong> grammar issues also affected other LOCs as with the structure of sentences,<br />

often resulting in convoluted, fragmented and/or run-on sentences. I quickly surmised that neither HOCs<br />

nor LOCs could be addressed to the exclusion of the other. I’m sure some of you may have already or will<br />

soon run into similar disparities between HOC and LOC priorities in your tutoring sessions. Determined<br />

to bridge the gap between HOC and LOC priorities as they relate to grammar, I decided to address the<br />

needs of each individual tutee, focusing in on their specific writing issues. <strong>The</strong> following two examples<br />

are taken from my own tutoring experiences with the hope that, in sharing these experiences with you,<br />

you might find some idea or bit of information helpful and apply the idea(s) to your own tutoring<br />

sessions.<br />

One of my first tutees was an ESL student majoring in Biochemistry. She came in for her first<br />

session requesting assistance on a research paper. I began the session with an open-ended question,<br />

“What would you like to focus on today in your paper?” She responded emphatically,<br />

“Grammar. I have many problems with grammar. My professor not understand my paper.” I<br />

continued on with the session, attempting to focus in on HOCs. She continued on with the session, only<br />

interested in her primary goal, the correction of her grammar. I had her make notes throughout the session<br />

on her paper so she could refer to my wonderful insights into improving clarity, structure, paragraph<br />

cohesion, etc. later during her revision process. <strong>The</strong> tutee was enthusiastic and determined, just like I was.<br />

Our next session began the same way, the tutee even more anxious about her grammar. When I reviewed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!