The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento
The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento
The Tutoring Book - California State University, Sacramento
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Rubric’s Cube<br />
Cubing is another brainstorming strategy that might appeal to you and your tutee. Cubing is when you<br />
look at the same topic from six different angles—like the six sides of a cube. Like free writing, cubing is<br />
a timed exercise. Have your tutee spend three to five minutes responding to each of these six prompts<br />
about the same topic:<br />
1. Describe it.<br />
2. Compare it.<br />
3. Associate it.<br />
4. Analyze it.<br />
5. Apply it.<br />
6. Argue for or against it.<br />
Keeping the prompt in mind is important when using the cubing exercise. For instance, if the prompt<br />
asks the paper to compare and contrast some idea or theme, use what you’ve found in the “the cube” to<br />
isolate the ideas that are the most relevant to the assignment. Or, if the paper is pretty open-ended, you<br />
and the tutee might choose the “side” of the cube that interests the tutee the most, or on which the tutee<br />
has the most written and begin crafting an outline that reflects that “side.” Cubing works well when the<br />
tutee has to grapple with an abstract concept or when the tutee knows what topic she wants to address, but<br />
doesn’t know which “angle” of the topic would most suit her needs.<br />
Hip to be Square<br />
Many papers in lower division writing classes ask the students to reflect on some aspect—or all aspects—<br />
of the rhetorical square. <strong>The</strong> rhetorical square looks a little like this, only more “square” :<br />
Purpose Audience<br />
Message Persona<br />
You and the student might begin looking at the paper’s topic with these ideas in mind. You might ask<br />
your tutee to consider what is the purpose—or goal—of the assignment or the chosen topic. Maybe look<br />
again at those specific “instructional” words in the prompt. Look also at the paper’s audience.<br />
Obviously, the first audience is usually the professor. Now might be a good time for you and your tutee<br />
to consider how the professor views his or her role. Is the professor asking the student to treat him/her as<br />
the paper’s sole audience? Does the professor expect the tutee to write as a member of a certain discourse<br />
community? Or does the professor want the tutee to write a more personal, reflective essay? Perhaps the<br />
professor has intimated that he or she would like to see certain things in the paper (such as no first-person<br />
pronouns). But depending on the assignment, the paper might be designed for other students (much like<br />
this paper) or for a specified group of people in a certain discipline. Many papers in 109 classes ask<br />
students to focus on the concept of the rhetorical square; this exercise might be perfectly suited to a<br />
student who is writing in such a context. Persona is also a good thing to review with your tutee. Persona<br />
is, in simplest terms, your tutee’s voice. Some papers lend themselves to a less formal sort of writing<br />
style; other papers require a more sophisticated vocabulary. But in all writing, your tutee will project a<br />
persona or voice. With your tutee, examine whether or not it is an appropriate voice given the context of<br />
the assignment.<br />
20