It's time for - The Police Association Victoria
It's time for - The Police Association Victoria
It's time for - The Police Association Victoria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SECRETARY’S MESSAGE<br />
At the General Meeting on 2 may<br />
2011 there were 2,500 police<br />
members in attendance at<br />
the Dallas Brooks Centre in<br />
East melbourne.<br />
Never, in my 34 years in the job, have I<br />
attended a meeting that was so united,<br />
supportive and showed such resolve as<br />
this one. As a part of your <strong>Association</strong>,<br />
I was humbled but, in considering the<br />
response afterwards, not surprised at the<br />
spontaneous applause of the meeting over<br />
the proposals to implement the outlined<br />
Protected Industrial Action.<br />
If the Government now truly believes that<br />
they can outlast the membership of <strong>The</strong><br />
<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong> on this issue then they<br />
are as blind to the facts as they are to<br />
your welfare.<br />
Our claim is fair − it is reasonable − it is<br />
af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong> Government.<br />
If the Government is frightened of dealing<br />
with other unions later this year and next<br />
year then that is not your problem. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />
problem is that they are frightened, right<br />
now, of dealing with you.<br />
Our issue is with the way in which they<br />
have dealt with the police officers of this<br />
state, who will be expected to successfully<br />
implement all of the untried, untested and<br />
unproven Government Law & Order Policies<br />
in return <strong>for</strong> your realistic wage reduction.<br />
Our stance is that you, the police officers<br />
of this state, have been propping up<br />
community safety in a police <strong>for</strong>ce<br />
that has been, <strong>for</strong> each of the last seven<br />
years, the worst resourced and financed<br />
in this country. In that <strong>time</strong>, despite<br />
Government neglect, you have delivered<br />
record low road tolls, lower crime rates<br />
and the highest level of "customer<br />
satisfaction" of any police <strong>for</strong>ce in Australia<br />
(and that’s not our claim, they are the facts,<br />
published by the Federal Government’s<br />
‘Productivity Commission’).<br />
So how does a grateful government, who<br />
promised to take care of inflation and then<br />
add additional pay <strong>for</strong> productivity gains,<br />
now treat you − the long suffering servants<br />
of the community?<br />
It tells you that you can have a<br />
2.5 per cent pay rise, each year <strong>for</strong> four<br />
years (to conveniently push the next<br />
Our claim is fair<br />
- it is reasonable -<br />
it is af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong><br />
Government.<br />
EB negotiations beyond the 2014 State<br />
Election) and no rise at all to non-salary<br />
related expenses. It tells you that you are<br />
not worth the inflation rate to them.<br />
In a remarkable ‘goalpost-changing’ move,<br />
it then tells you that "productivity" now<br />
means giving government cash back from<br />
the police budget. Isn’t that a ripper?<br />
<strong>The</strong> government want you (who do not<br />
control the police budget) or the <strong>Association</strong><br />
(who − take a wild guess − doesn’t control<br />
the police budget either) to hand them<br />
money back from the police budget in order<br />
to get a pay-rise.<br />
That is an outrageous demand because<br />
it simply means that you cannot have<br />
any pay-rise above 2.5 per cent because<br />
GREG DAVIES > SECRETARY<br />
they’ve demanded something you cannot<br />
deliver in return.<br />
We didn’t want a fight over this matter<br />
− we went to Government with a fair,<br />
reasonable and af<strong>for</strong>dable pay claim, and<br />
one which contained no monetary ambit.<br />
We wanted to transition from the current<br />
Agreement into a new Agreement in a<br />
seamless process.<br />
Well, Government have not moved from<br />
their 2.5 per cent nonsense since they<br />
first proposed it several months ago.<br />
You might also want to ask how they<br />
came up with the imaginary figure of<br />
2.5 per cent as their version of the inflation<br />
rate. <strong>The</strong> answer seems to be "it was<br />
convenient <strong>for</strong> them," because it bears<br />
no resemblance to the real situation.<br />
We didn’t ask <strong>for</strong> this fight and we didn’t<br />
want it − but now that the Government<br />
has demanded it we have no choice but<br />
to oblige them.<br />
It is imperative that you fill out the secret<br />
ballot <strong>for</strong>m that you will receive from<br />
the Australian Electoral Commission<br />
and post it back immediately. This is<br />
the next step to the commencement<br />
of Protected Industrial Action on 6 June<br />
2011 − coincidentally, and ominously <strong>for</strong><br />
government, the anniversary of "D-Day."<br />
One thing we can guarantee − we didn’t<br />
start this fight but we will end it. And we<br />
will end it by getting what we reasonably<br />
asked <strong>for</strong> in October 2010.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong> Journal May 2011<br />
05