28.09.2014 Views

It's time for - The Police Association Victoria

It's time for - The Police Association Victoria

It's time for - The Police Association Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECRETARY’S MESSAGE<br />

At the General Meeting on 2 may<br />

2011 there were 2,500 police<br />

members in attendance at<br />

the Dallas Brooks Centre in<br />

East melbourne.<br />

Never, in my 34 years in the job, have I<br />

attended a meeting that was so united,<br />

supportive and showed such resolve as<br />

this one. As a part of your <strong>Association</strong>,<br />

I was humbled but, in considering the<br />

response afterwards, not surprised at the<br />

spontaneous applause of the meeting over<br />

the proposals to implement the outlined<br />

Protected Industrial Action.<br />

If the Government now truly believes that<br />

they can outlast the membership of <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong> on this issue then they<br />

are as blind to the facts as they are to<br />

your welfare.<br />

Our claim is fair − it is reasonable − it is<br />

af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong> Government.<br />

If the Government is frightened of dealing<br />

with other unions later this year and next<br />

year then that is not your problem. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

problem is that they are frightened, right<br />

now, of dealing with you.<br />

Our issue is with the way in which they<br />

have dealt with the police officers of this<br />

state, who will be expected to successfully<br />

implement all of the untried, untested and<br />

unproven Government Law & Order Policies<br />

in return <strong>for</strong> your realistic wage reduction.<br />

Our stance is that you, the police officers<br />

of this state, have been propping up<br />

community safety in a police <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

that has been, <strong>for</strong> each of the last seven<br />

years, the worst resourced and financed<br />

in this country. In that <strong>time</strong>, despite<br />

Government neglect, you have delivered<br />

record low road tolls, lower crime rates<br />

and the highest level of "customer<br />

satisfaction" of any police <strong>for</strong>ce in Australia<br />

(and that’s not our claim, they are the facts,<br />

published by the Federal Government’s<br />

‘Productivity Commission’).<br />

So how does a grateful government, who<br />

promised to take care of inflation and then<br />

add additional pay <strong>for</strong> productivity gains,<br />

now treat you − the long suffering servants<br />

of the community?<br />

It tells you that you can have a<br />

2.5 per cent pay rise, each year <strong>for</strong> four<br />

years (to conveniently push the next<br />

Our claim is fair<br />

- it is reasonable -<br />

it is af<strong>for</strong>dable <strong>for</strong><br />

Government.<br />

EB negotiations beyond the 2014 State<br />

Election) and no rise at all to non-salary<br />

related expenses. It tells you that you are<br />

not worth the inflation rate to them.<br />

In a remarkable ‘goalpost-changing’ move,<br />

it then tells you that "productivity" now<br />

means giving government cash back from<br />

the police budget. Isn’t that a ripper?<br />

<strong>The</strong> government want you (who do not<br />

control the police budget) or the <strong>Association</strong><br />

(who − take a wild guess − doesn’t control<br />

the police budget either) to hand them<br />

money back from the police budget in order<br />

to get a pay-rise.<br />

That is an outrageous demand because<br />

it simply means that you cannot have<br />

any pay-rise above 2.5 per cent because<br />

GREG DAVIES > SECRETARY<br />

they’ve demanded something you cannot<br />

deliver in return.<br />

We didn’t want a fight over this matter<br />

− we went to Government with a fair,<br />

reasonable and af<strong>for</strong>dable pay claim, and<br />

one which contained no monetary ambit.<br />

We wanted to transition from the current<br />

Agreement into a new Agreement in a<br />

seamless process.<br />

Well, Government have not moved from<br />

their 2.5 per cent nonsense since they<br />

first proposed it several months ago.<br />

You might also want to ask how they<br />

came up with the imaginary figure of<br />

2.5 per cent as their version of the inflation<br />

rate. <strong>The</strong> answer seems to be "it was<br />

convenient <strong>for</strong> them," because it bears<br />

no resemblance to the real situation.<br />

We didn’t ask <strong>for</strong> this fight and we didn’t<br />

want it − but now that the Government<br />

has demanded it we have no choice but<br />

to oblige them.<br />

It is imperative that you fill out the secret<br />

ballot <strong>for</strong>m that you will receive from<br />

the Australian Electoral Commission<br />

and post it back immediately. This is<br />

the next step to the commencement<br />

of Protected Industrial Action on 6 June<br />

2011 − coincidentally, and ominously <strong>for</strong><br />

government, the anniversary of "D-Day."<br />

One thing we can guarantee − we didn’t<br />

start this fight but we will end it. And we<br />

will end it by getting what we reasonably<br />

asked <strong>for</strong> in October 2010.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Association</strong> <strong>Victoria</strong> Journal May 2011<br />

05

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!