PDF (double-sided) - Physics Department, UCSB - University of ...
PDF (double-sided) - Physics Department, UCSB - University of ... PDF (double-sided) - Physics Department, UCSB - University of ...
equires to converge. Since the algorithm has much less built-in “smart” decision making, it needs to draw its information from more data. But due to its pipelineability and thus higher duty cycle, it does not run for much longer than the Nelder-Mead Simplex algorithm before it converges. 11.4 Experimental Results Even though the main result of the experiment consists of only the obtained S-value together with its standard deviation, this number needs to be supplemented with several datasets that test the experiment for flaws. The most useful of this additional information are the parameters of the sequence found by the optimization, since angles that match the theoretically expected values are a strong indication that the implementation can be trusted. To claim a reliable violation, the dataset should further address all known mechanism for the introduction of artificial correlations during the time of measurement, e.g. microwave and measurement crosstalk. Additional checks that show the variation of S as a function of certain parameters can be of assistance in debugging the experiment, but are of lesser importance for proving its correctness due to the robustness of the inequality. Finally, to explain the obtained S-value, the performance parameters of the involved qubits (and resonator), like T 1 and T 2 , can be used in a simulation 258
Table 11.6: Qubit Sample Parameters – Capacitive Coupling Implementation Parameter Value Qubit A: T 1 340 ns Visibility 85.8% Qubit B: T 1 480 ns Visibility 85.3% Coupling: Swap Frequency 11.4 MHz Measurement Crosstalk ∼ 10% to create an error budget for the experiment. 11.4.1 Capacitive Coupling For the capacitively coupled sample, the optimization yielded an S-value of 1.816 (see Table 11.7) for the sequence parameters shown in Table 11.8. As expected from theory, the two measurements on each qubit are roughly perpendicular (α−α ′ ≈ 73 ◦ −(−16 ◦ ) = 89 ◦ and β −β ′ ≈ 168 ◦ −82 ◦ = 86 ◦ ). The phases of the rotation pulses, i.e. the planes in which the qubits are measured, seem less correct at first glance. But it is hard to come to a reliable conclusion since φ a ′ and φ b 259
- Page 236 and 237: simultaneous application of such me
- Page 238 and 239: Figure 9.4: Capacitive Coupling Swa
- Page 240 and 241: Figure 9.6: Capacitive Coupling Pha
- Page 242 and 243: a phase difference of 0 ◦ rather
- Page 244 and 245: Figure 9.7: Fine Spectroscopy of Re
- Page 246 and 247: Figure 9.8: Swapping Photon into Re
- Page 248 and 249: esonator. The latter calibration is
- Page 250 and 251: Figure 9.11: Resonator T 1 - a) Seq
- Page 252 and 253: 224
- Page 254 and 255: He does not throw dice” [Einstein
- Page 256 and 257: (independent of which axis it is),
- Page 258 and 259: of E xy is measured by expressing i
- Page 260 and 261: For a measurement of two particles
- Page 262 and 263: 10.2.1 Photons The first and most n
- Page 264 and 265: 10.2.3 Ion and Photon In the attemp
- Page 266 and 267: 238
- Page 268 and 269: 11.1 State Preparation Since the ab
- Page 270 and 271: Figure 11.1: Bell State Preparation
- Page 272 and 273: Table 11.1: Entangled State Density
- Page 274 and 275: Figure 11.2: Bell Measurements - a)
- Page 276 and 277: 11.2.3 Statistical Analysis For the
- Page 278 and 279: 11.3 Calibration The most difficult
- Page 280 and 281: Table 11.4: Sequence Parameters - R
- Page 282 and 283: ally determine an optimal value for
- Page 284 and 285: ages are based on this method, incl
- Page 288 and 289: Table 11.7: Bell Violation Results
- Page 290 and 291: Table 11.9: Error Budget - Capaciti
- Page 292 and 293: Table 11.10: Bell Violation Results
- Page 294 and 295: Bell inequality. To make this claim
- Page 296 and 297: Table 11.12: Bell Violation Results
- Page 298 and 299: 11.5.2 Dependence of S on Sequence
- Page 300 and 301: point where the measurement happens
- Page 302 and 303: The second qubit is not driven and
- Page 304 and 305: Figure 11.6: Resonator Coupled Samp
- Page 306 and 307: From the resulting states, the 16 p
- Page 308 and 309: Table 11.14: Error Budget - Resonat
- Page 310 and 311: Table 11.15: Bell Violation Results
- Page 312 and 313: sponding to a violation by 244.0σ.
- Page 314 and 315: educe energy decay and dephasing an
- Page 316 and 317: John F. Clauser, Michael A. Horne,
- Page 318 and 319: J. Majer, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambett
- Page 320: Matthias Steffen, M. Ansmann, Rados
Table 11.6: Qubit Sample Parameters – Capacitive Coupling Implementation<br />
Parameter<br />
Value<br />
Qubit A:<br />
T 1<br />
340 ns<br />
Visibility 85.8%<br />
Qubit B:<br />
T 1<br />
480 ns<br />
Visibility 85.3%<br />
Coupling:<br />
Swap Frequency 11.4 MHz<br />
Measurement Crosstalk ∼ 10%<br />
to create an error budget for the experiment.<br />
11.4.1 Capacitive Coupling<br />
For the capacitively coupled sample, the optimization yielded an S-value <strong>of</strong><br />
1.816 (see Table 11.7) for the sequence parameters shown in Table 11.8. As expected<br />
from theory, the two measurements on each qubit are roughly perpendicular<br />
(α−α ′ ≈ 73 ◦ −(−16 ◦ ) = 89 ◦ and β −β ′ ≈ 168 ◦ −82 ◦ = 86 ◦ ). The phases <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rotation pulses, i.e. the planes in which the qubits are measured, seem less correct<br />
at first glance. But it is hard to come to a reliable conclusion since φ a ′<br />
and φ b<br />
259