PDF (double-sided) - Physics Department, UCSB - University of ...

PDF (double-sided) - Physics Department, UCSB - University of ... PDF (double-sided) - Physics Department, UCSB - University of ...

web.physics.ucsb.edu
from web.physics.ucsb.edu More from this publisher
27.09.2014 Views

4.2.1 Qubit When designing the inductor of the qubit it is important to reduce the circuit’s sensitivity to any potentially fluctuating external background magnetic fields. This can be achieved to first order by arranging the inductor into a symmetric figure-8 configuration. With this, any current induced in one of the loops by a background field is exactly cancelled by the current induced in the other loop. This makes the qubit sensitive only to gradients in magnetic fields and is therefore also called a gradiometer design. The actual shape of the inductor is best designed with modeling software. A very powerful free tool that serves this purpose well is FastHenry. It allows for the specification of traces of given dimensions and will then calculate the resulting inductance of all connected traces and all mutual inductances between different sets of connected traces. Again, the design allows for a lot of flexibility in the choices of exact parameters but there are a few concerns to keep in mind. The width of traces used in the design should be large enough to yield reproducible results during fabrication, but not too large to avoid trapping magnetic flux vortices. A good size here seems 2 µm. The number of turns in the inductor needs to be balanced between the overall size of the structure and the added capacitance due to the needed crossovers. Two turns here seem to be a good number. 82

The geometry of the qubit junction is a lot more strictly defined. It needs to be as small as possible since even a single materials defect in the junction couples strongly to the qubit and thus needs to be avoided. On the other hand it cannot be so small as to not yield reliable fabrication results. Also, since the junction’s oxide thickness is somewhat irreproducible, it is useful to generate an array of junctions on the wafer with slightly different areas to guarantee that some dies on the wafer will yield the desired critical current. A design with 2 µm 2 wedge-shaped junctions, all oriented in the same direction so that they can be pass-shifted together, works well. The requirement that the junction needs to be as small as possible does not allow for its capacitance to be large enough to reach the needed value. This can be easily remedied with an external shunting capacitor. This capacitor can be implemented with a trivial parallel-plate design. Its geometry is chosen using the relations: C = C ext + C junc (4.5) C ext = ε A d (4.6) When choosing A versus d, the only concerns are the reliability of fabrication and the size of the final structure. 83

The geometry <strong>of</strong> the qubit junction is a lot more strictly defined. It needs<br />

to be as small as possible since even a single materials defect in the junction<br />

couples strongly to the qubit and thus needs to be avoided. On the other hand<br />

it cannot be so small as to not yield reliable fabrication results. Also, since the<br />

junction’s oxide thickness is somewhat irreproducible, it is useful to generate an<br />

array <strong>of</strong> junctions on the wafer with slightly different areas to guarantee that<br />

some dies on the wafer will yield the desired critical current. A design with 2 µm 2<br />

wedge-shaped junctions, all oriented in the same direction so that they can be<br />

pass-shifted together, works well.<br />

The requirement that the junction needs to be as small as possible does not<br />

allow for its capacitance to be large enough to reach the needed value. This can<br />

be easily remedied with an external shunting capacitor. This capacitor can be<br />

implemented with a trivial parallel-plate design. Its geometry is chosen using the<br />

relations:<br />

C = C ext + C junc (4.5)<br />

C ext = ε A d<br />

(4.6)<br />

When choosing A versus d, the only concerns are the reliability <strong>of</strong> fabrication and<br />

the size <strong>of</strong> the final structure.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!