27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY<br />

spacelike separati<strong>on</strong>: Similarly, if the events are spacelike separated, there is<br />

an inertial frame in which the two are simultaneous – that is, in which<br />

∆t = 0. The distance between two events measured in such a reference<br />

frame is called the proper distance d. Much as above,<br />

d = √ ∆x 2 − c 2 ∆t 2 ≤ ∆x.<br />

Note that this seems to “go the opposite way” from the length c<strong>on</strong>tracti<strong>on</strong><br />

effect we derived in secti<strong>on</strong> 3.6. That is because here we c<strong>on</strong>sider the<br />

proper distance between two particular events. In c<strong>on</strong>trast, in measuring<br />

the length of an object, different observers do NOT use the same pair of<br />

events to determine length. Do you remember our previous discussi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

this issue?<br />

lightlike separati<strong>on</strong>: Two events that are al<strong>on</strong>g the same light ray satisfy<br />

∆x = ±c∆t. It follows that they are separated by zero interval in all<br />

reference frames. One can say that they are separated by both zero proper<br />

time <strong>and</strong> zero proper distance.<br />

4.1.2 Curved lines <strong>and</strong> accelerated objects<br />

Thinking of things in terms of proper time <strong>and</strong> proper distance makes it easier to<br />

deal with, say, accelerated objects. Suppose we want to compute, for example,<br />

the amount of time experienced by a clock that is not in an inertial frame.<br />

Perhaps it quickly changes from <strong>on</strong>e inertial frame to another, shown in the<br />

blue worldline (marked B) below. This blue worldline (B) is similar in nature<br />

to the worldline of the mu<strong>on</strong> in part (b) of problem 3-7.<br />

d<br />

t=4<br />

R<br />

a<br />

c<br />

B<br />

x=-4 x=0 x=4<br />

b<br />

t=0<br />

t=-4<br />

Note that the time experienced by the blue clock between events (a) <strong>and</strong> (b)<br />

is equal to the proper time between these events since, <strong>on</strong> that segment, the<br />

clock could be in an inertial frame. Surely the time measured by an ideal clock<br />

between (a) <strong>and</strong> (b) cannot depend <strong>on</strong> what it was doing before (a) or <strong>on</strong> what<br />

it does after (b).<br />

Similarly, the time experienced by the blue clock between events (b) <strong>and</strong> (c)<br />

should be the same as that experienced by a truly inertial clock moving between<br />

these events; i.e. the proper time between these events. Thus, we can find the<br />

total proper time experienced by the clock by adding the proper time between<br />

(a) <strong>and</strong> (b) to the proper time between (b) <strong>and</strong> (c) <strong>and</strong> between (c) <strong>and</strong> (d). We

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!