Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
74 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL FRAMES So, we see that distance measurements also depend on the observer’s frame of reference. Note however, that given any inertial object, there is a special inertial frame in which the object is at rest. The length of an object in its own rest frame is known as its proper length. The length of the object in any other inertial frame will be shorter than the object’s proper length. We can summarize what we have learned by stating: An object of proper length L moving through an inertial frame at speed v has length L √ 1 − v 2 /c 2 as measured in that inertial frame. There is an important subtlety that we should explore. Note that the above statement refers to an object. However, we can also talk about proper distance between two events. When two events are spacelike related, there is a special frame of reference in which the events are simultaneous and the separation is “pure space” (with no separation in time). The distance between them in this frame is called the proper distance between the events. It turns out that this distance is in fact longer in any other frame of reference..... Why longer? To understand this, look back at the above diagram and compare the two events at either end of the students’ rod that are simultaneous in the professor’s frame of reference. Note that the proper distance is the distance measured in the professor’s reference frame, which we just concluded is shorter than the distance measured by the student. The difference here is that we are now talking about events (points on the diagram) where as before we were talking about objects (whose ends appear as worldlines on the spacetime diagram). The point is that, when we talk about measuring the length of an object, different observers are actually measuring the distance between different pairs of events. 3.7 The Train Paradox Let us now test our new skills and work through some subtleties by considering an age-old parable known as the train paradox. It goes like this: Once upon a time there was a really fast Japanese bullet train that ran at 80% of the speed of light. The train was 100m long in its own rest frame. The train carried as cargo the profits of SONY corporation from Tokyo out to their headquarters in the countryside. The profits were, of course, carried in pure gold. Now, some less than reputable characters found out about this and devised an elaborate scheme to rob the train. They knew that the train would pass through a 100m long tunnel on its route. Watching the train go by, they measured the train to be quite a bit less than 100m long and so figured that they could easily trap it in the tunnel. Of course, the people on the train found that, when the train was in motion, it was the train that was 100m long while the tunnel was significantly shorter. As a result, they had no fear of being trapped in the tunnel by train robbers. Now, do you think the robbers managed to catch the train?
3.7. THE TRAIN PARADOX 75 Let’s draw a spacetime diagram using the tunnel’s frame of reference. We can let E represent the tunnel entrance and X represent the tunnel exit. Similarly, we let B represent the back of the train and F represent the front of the train. Let event 1 be the event where the back of the train finally reaches the tunnel and let event 2 be the event where the front of the train reaches the exit. Event 1 Event D Event 2 t ground =200 t =100 ground t =0 ground T r a i n B a c k x = -100 T T r a i n F r o n t Tunnel Entrance x ground =0 x = 0 T Tunnel Exit x =100m ground Suppose that one robber sits at the entrance to the tunnel and that one sits at the exit. When the train nears, they can blow up the entrance just after event 1 and they can blow up the exit just before event 2. Note that, in between these two events, the robbers find the train to be completely inside the tunnel. Now, what does the train think about all this? How are these events described in its frame of reference? Note that the train finds event 2 to occur long before event 1. So, can the train escape? Let’s think about what the train would need to do to escape. At event 2, the exit to the tunnel is blocked, and (from the train’s perspective) the debris blocking the exit is rushing toward the train at 80% the speed of light. The only way the train could escape would be to turn around and back out of the tunnel. Recall that the train finds that the entrance is still open at the time of event 2. Of course, both the front and back of the train must turn around. How does the back of the train know that it should do this? It could find out via a phone call from an engineer at the front to an engineer at the back of the train, or it could be via a shock wave that travels through the metal of the train as the front of the train throws on its brakes and reverses its engines. The point is though that some signal must pass from event 2 to the back of the train, possibly relayed along the way by something at the front of the train. Sticking to our assumption
- Page 24 and 25: 24 CONTENTS Course Calendar The fol
- Page 26 and 27: 26 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 28 and 29: 28 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 30 and 31: 30 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 34 and 35: 34 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 36 and 37: 36 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 38 and 39: 38 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 40 and 41: 40 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 42 and 43: 42 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 44 and 45: 44 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 46 and 47: 46 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 48 and 49: 48 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 50 and 51: 50 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 52 and 53: 52 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 54 and 55: 54 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 56 and 57: 56 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 58 and 59: 58 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 60 and 61: 60 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 62 and 63: 62 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 64 and 65: 64 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 66 and 67: 66 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 68 and 69: 68 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 70 and 71: 70 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 72 and 73: 72 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 76 and 77: 76 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 78 and 79: 78 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 80 and 81: 80 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 82 and 83: 82 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 84 and 85: 84 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 86 and 87: 86 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 88 and 89: 88 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 90 and 91: 90 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 92 and 93: 92 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 94 and 95: 94 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 96 and 97: 96 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 98 and 99: 98 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 100 and 101: 100 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 102 and 103: 102 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 104 and 105: 104 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 106 and 107: 106 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 110 and 111: 110 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 112 and 113: 112 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 114 and 115: 114 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 116 and 117: 116 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 118 and 119: 118 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 120 and 121: 120 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 122 and 123: 122 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
74 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL FRAMES<br />
So, we see that distance measurements also depend <strong>on</strong> the observer’s frame of<br />
reference. Note however, that given any inertial object, there is a special inertial<br />
frame in which the object is at rest. The length of an object in its own rest<br />
frame is known as its proper length. The length of the object in any other inertial<br />
frame will be shorter than the object’s proper length. We can summarize what<br />
we have learned by stating:<br />
An object of proper length L moving through an inertial frame at speed v<br />
has length L √ 1 − v 2 /c 2 as measured in that inertial frame.<br />
There is an important subtlety that we should explore. Note that the above<br />
statement refers to an object. However, we can also talk about proper distance<br />
between two events. When two events are spacelike related, there is a special<br />
frame of reference in which the events are simultaneous <strong>and</strong> the separati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
“pure space” (with no separati<strong>on</strong> in time). The distance between them in this<br />
frame is called the proper distance between the events. It turns out that this<br />
distance is in fact l<strong>on</strong>ger in any other frame of reference.....<br />
Why l<strong>on</strong>ger? To underst<strong>and</strong> this, look back at the above diagram <strong>and</strong> compare<br />
the two events at either end of the students’ rod that are simultaneous in the<br />
professor’s frame of reference. Note that the proper distance is the distance<br />
measured in the professor’s reference frame, which we just c<strong>on</strong>cluded is shorter<br />
than the distance measured by the student. The difference here is that we are<br />
now talking about events (points <strong>on</strong> the diagram) where as before we were<br />
talking about objects (whose ends appear as worldlines <strong>on</strong> the spacetime diagram).<br />
The point is that, when we talk about measuring the length of an object,<br />
different observers are actually measuring the distance between different pairs<br />
of events.<br />
3.7 The Train Paradox<br />
Let us now test our new skills <strong>and</strong> work through some subtleties by c<strong>on</strong>sidering<br />
an age-old parable known as the train paradox. It goes like this:<br />
Once up<strong>on</strong> a time there was a really fast Japanese bullet train that ran at 80%<br />
of the speed of light. The train was 100m l<strong>on</strong>g in its own rest frame. The<br />
train carried as cargo the profits of SONY corporati<strong>on</strong> from Tokyo out to their<br />
headquarters in the countryside. The profits were, of course, carried in pure<br />
gold.<br />
Now, some less than reputable characters found out about this <strong>and</strong> devised an<br />
elaborate scheme to rob the train. They knew that the train would pass through<br />
a 100m l<strong>on</strong>g tunnel <strong>on</strong> its route. Watching the train go by, they measured the<br />
train to be quite a bit less than 100m l<strong>on</strong>g <strong>and</strong> so figured that they could easily<br />
trap it in the tunnel.<br />
Of course, the people <strong>on</strong> the train found that, when the train was in moti<strong>on</strong>,<br />
it was the train that was 100m l<strong>on</strong>g while the tunnel was significantly shorter.<br />
As a result, they had no fear of being trapped in the tunnel by train robbers.<br />
Now, do you think the robbers managed to catch the train?