Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

web.physics.ucsb.edu
from web.physics.ucsb.edu More from this publisher
27.09.2014 Views

74 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL FRAMES So, we see that distance measurements also depend on the observer’s frame of reference. Note however, that given any inertial object, there is a special inertial frame in which the object is at rest. The length of an object in its own rest frame is known as its proper length. The length of the object in any other inertial frame will be shorter than the object’s proper length. We can summarize what we have learned by stating: An object of proper length L moving through an inertial frame at speed v has length L √ 1 − v 2 /c 2 as measured in that inertial frame. There is an important subtlety that we should explore. Note that the above statement refers to an object. However, we can also talk about proper distance between two events. When two events are spacelike related, there is a special frame of reference in which the events are simultaneous and the separation is “pure space” (with no separation in time). The distance between them in this frame is called the proper distance between the events. It turns out that this distance is in fact longer in any other frame of reference..... Why longer? To understand this, look back at the above diagram and compare the two events at either end of the students’ rod that are simultaneous in the professor’s frame of reference. Note that the proper distance is the distance measured in the professor’s reference frame, which we just concluded is shorter than the distance measured by the student. The difference here is that we are now talking about events (points on the diagram) where as before we were talking about objects (whose ends appear as worldlines on the spacetime diagram). The point is that, when we talk about measuring the length of an object, different observers are actually measuring the distance between different pairs of events. 3.7 The Train Paradox Let us now test our new skills and work through some subtleties by considering an age-old parable known as the train paradox. It goes like this: Once upon a time there was a really fast Japanese bullet train that ran at 80% of the speed of light. The train was 100m long in its own rest frame. The train carried as cargo the profits of SONY corporation from Tokyo out to their headquarters in the countryside. The profits were, of course, carried in pure gold. Now, some less than reputable characters found out about this and devised an elaborate scheme to rob the train. They knew that the train would pass through a 100m long tunnel on its route. Watching the train go by, they measured the train to be quite a bit less than 100m long and so figured that they could easily trap it in the tunnel. Of course, the people on the train found that, when the train was in motion, it was the train that was 100m long while the tunnel was significantly shorter. As a result, they had no fear of being trapped in the tunnel by train robbers. Now, do you think the robbers managed to catch the train?

3.7. THE TRAIN PARADOX 75 Let’s draw a spacetime diagram using the tunnel’s frame of reference. We can let E represent the tunnel entrance and X represent the tunnel exit. Similarly, we let B represent the back of the train and F represent the front of the train. Let event 1 be the event where the back of the train finally reaches the tunnel and let event 2 be the event where the front of the train reaches the exit. Event 1 Event D Event 2 t ground =200 t =100 ground t =0 ground T r a i n B a c k x = -100 T T r a i n F r o n t Tunnel Entrance x ground =0 x = 0 T Tunnel Exit x =100m ground Suppose that one robber sits at the entrance to the tunnel and that one sits at the exit. When the train nears, they can blow up the entrance just after event 1 and they can blow up the exit just before event 2. Note that, in between these two events, the robbers find the train to be completely inside the tunnel. Now, what does the train think about all this? How are these events described in its frame of reference? Note that the train finds event 2 to occur long before event 1. So, can the train escape? Let’s think about what the train would need to do to escape. At event 2, the exit to the tunnel is blocked, and (from the train’s perspective) the debris blocking the exit is rushing toward the train at 80% the speed of light. The only way the train could escape would be to turn around and back out of the tunnel. Recall that the train finds that the entrance is still open at the time of event 2. Of course, both the front and back of the train must turn around. How does the back of the train know that it should do this? It could find out via a phone call from an engineer at the front to an engineer at the back of the train, or it could be via a shock wave that travels through the metal of the train as the front of the train throws on its brakes and reverses its engines. The point is though that some signal must pass from event 2 to the back of the train, possibly relayed along the way by something at the front of the train. Sticking to our assumption

74 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL FRAMES<br />

So, we see that distance measurements also depend <strong>on</strong> the observer’s frame of<br />

reference. Note however, that given any inertial object, there is a special inertial<br />

frame in which the object is at rest. The length of an object in its own rest<br />

frame is known as its proper length. The length of the object in any other inertial<br />

frame will be shorter than the object’s proper length. We can summarize what<br />

we have learned by stating:<br />

An object of proper length L moving through an inertial frame at speed v<br />

has length L √ 1 − v 2 /c 2 as measured in that inertial frame.<br />

There is an important subtlety that we should explore. Note that the above<br />

statement refers to an object. However, we can also talk about proper distance<br />

between two events. When two events are spacelike related, there is a special<br />

frame of reference in which the events are simultaneous <strong>and</strong> the separati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

“pure space” (with no separati<strong>on</strong> in time). The distance between them in this<br />

frame is called the proper distance between the events. It turns out that this<br />

distance is in fact l<strong>on</strong>ger in any other frame of reference.....<br />

Why l<strong>on</strong>ger? To underst<strong>and</strong> this, look back at the above diagram <strong>and</strong> compare<br />

the two events at either end of the students’ rod that are simultaneous in the<br />

professor’s frame of reference. Note that the proper distance is the distance<br />

measured in the professor’s reference frame, which we just c<strong>on</strong>cluded is shorter<br />

than the distance measured by the student. The difference here is that we are<br />

now talking about events (points <strong>on</strong> the diagram) where as before we were<br />

talking about objects (whose ends appear as worldlines <strong>on</strong> the spacetime diagram).<br />

The point is that, when we talk about measuring the length of an object,<br />

different observers are actually measuring the distance between different pairs<br />

of events.<br />

3.7 The Train Paradox<br />

Let us now test our new skills <strong>and</strong> work through some subtleties by c<strong>on</strong>sidering<br />

an age-old parable known as the train paradox. It goes like this:<br />

Once up<strong>on</strong> a time there was a really fast Japanese bullet train that ran at 80%<br />

of the speed of light. The train was 100m l<strong>on</strong>g in its own rest frame. The<br />

train carried as cargo the profits of SONY corporati<strong>on</strong> from Tokyo out to their<br />

headquarters in the countryside. The profits were, of course, carried in pure<br />

gold.<br />

Now, some less than reputable characters found out about this <strong>and</strong> devised an<br />

elaborate scheme to rob the train. They knew that the train would pass through<br />

a 100m l<strong>on</strong>g tunnel <strong>on</strong> its route. Watching the train go by, they measured the<br />

train to be quite a bit less than 100m l<strong>on</strong>g <strong>and</strong> so figured that they could easily<br />

trap it in the tunnel.<br />

Of course, the people <strong>on</strong> the train found that, when the train was in moti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

it was the train that was 100m l<strong>on</strong>g while the tunnel was significantly shorter.<br />

As a result, they had no fear of being trapped in the tunnel by train robbers.<br />

Now, do you think the robbers managed to catch the train?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!