Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
64 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL FRAMES B simultaneous frame A frame in which A happens first In this case we say that they are timelike related. Note that the following things are true in this case: a) There is an inertial observer who moves through both events and whose speed in the original frame is less than that of light. b) All inertial observers agree on which event (A or B) happened first. c) As a result, we can meaningfully speak of, say, event A being to the past of event B. case 3) A and B are on each other’s light cones. In this case we say that they are lightlike related. Again, all inertial observers agree on which event happened first and we can meaningfully speak of one of them being to the past of the other. Now, why did we consider only inertial frames with relative speeds less than c? Suppose for the moment that our busy friend (the inertial observer) could in fact travel at v > c (i.e., faster than light) as shown below at left. I have marked two events, A and B that occur on her worldline. In our frame event A occurs first. However, the two events are spacelike related. Thus, there is another inertial frame (t other , x other ) in which B occurs before A as shown below at right. This means that there is some inertial observer (the one whose frame is drawn at right) who would see her traveling backwards in time.
3.5. TIME DILATION 65 x =0 us x = 0 other x = 0 other t other = const friend’s line of simultaneity Us A t = const A B other B t =0 other Worldline moves faster than light This was too weird even for Einstein. After all, if she could turn around, our faster-than-light friend could even carry a message from some observer’s future into that observer’s past. This raises all of the famous ‘what if you killed your grandparents’ scenarios from science fiction fame. The point is that, in relativity, travel faster than light is travel backwards in time. For this reason, let us simply ignore the possibility of such observers for awhile. In fact, we will assume that no information of any kind can be transmitted faster than c. I promise that we will come back to this issue later. The proper place to deal with this turns out to be in chapter 5. x = 0 s t = const other t =0 other C A Me B 3.5 Time Dilation We are beginning to come to terms with simultaneity but, as pointed out earlier, we are still missing important information about how different inertial frames match up. In particular, we still do not know just what value of constant t f the
- Page 14 and 15: 14 CONTENTS but this does not mean
- Page 16 and 17: 16 CONTENTS 0.3 Coursework and Grad
- Page 18 and 19: 18 CONTENTS d) include references t
- Page 20 and 21: 20 CONTENTS However, your challenge
- Page 22 and 23: 22 CONTENTS 0.4 Some Suggestions fo
- Page 24 and 25: 24 CONTENTS Course Calendar The fol
- Page 26 and 27: 26 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 28 and 29: 28 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 30 and 31: 30 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 34 and 35: 34 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 36 and 37: 36 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 38 and 39: 38 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 40 and 41: 40 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 42 and 43: 42 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 44 and 45: 44 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 46 and 47: 46 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 48 and 49: 48 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 50 and 51: 50 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 52 and 53: 52 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 54 and 55: 54 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 56 and 57: 56 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 58 and 59: 58 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 60 and 61: 60 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 62 and 63: 62 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 66 and 67: 66 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 68 and 69: 68 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 70 and 71: 70 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 72 and 73: 72 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 74 and 75: 74 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 76 and 77: 76 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 78 and 79: 78 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 80 and 81: 80 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 82 and 83: 82 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 84 and 85: 84 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 86 and 87: 86 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 88 and 89: 88 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 90 and 91: 90 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 92 and 93: 92 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 94 and 95: 94 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 96 and 97: 96 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 98 and 99: 98 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 100 and 101: 100 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 102 and 103: 102 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 104 and 105: 104 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 106 and 107: 106 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 110 and 111: 110 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 112 and 113: 112 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
3.5. TIME DILATION 65<br />
x =0<br />
us<br />
x = 0<br />
other<br />
x = 0<br />
other<br />
t<br />
other<br />
= c<strong>on</strong>st<br />
friend’s line of<br />
simultaneity<br />
Us<br />
A<br />
t = c<strong>on</strong>st<br />
A B other<br />
B<br />
t =0<br />
other<br />
Worldline moves faster than light<br />
This was too weird even for Einstein. After all, if she could turn around, our<br />
faster-than-light friend could even carry a message from some observer’s future<br />
into that observer’s past. This raises all of the famous ‘what if you killed your<br />
gr<strong>and</strong>parents’ scenarios from science ficti<strong>on</strong> fame. The point is that, in relativity,<br />
travel faster than light is travel backwards in time. For this reas<strong>on</strong>, let us simply<br />
ignore the possibility of such observers for awhile. In fact, we will assume that<br />
no informati<strong>on</strong> of any kind can be transmitted faster than c. I promise that we<br />
will come back to this issue later. The proper place to deal with this turns out<br />
to be in chapter 5.<br />
x = 0<br />
s<br />
t<br />
= c<strong>on</strong>st<br />
other<br />
t =0<br />
other<br />
C<br />
A<br />
Me<br />
B<br />
3.5 Time Dilati<strong>on</strong><br />
We are beginning to come to terms with simultaneity but, as pointed out earlier,<br />
we are still missing important informati<strong>on</strong> about how different inertial frames<br />
match up. In particular, we still do not know just what value of c<strong>on</strong>stant t f the