Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
34 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWTONIAN PHYSICS A V BA t V CB t V CA B t C time t WLOG, take t=0 here At time t, the separation between A and C is V CA t, but we see from the diagram that it is is also V CB t + V BA t. Canceling the t’s, we have V CA = V CB + V BA . (1.2) QED ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ Now, our instructions about how to draw the diagram (from the facts that our ideas about time and position are well-defined) came from assumptions T and S, so the Newtonian formula for the addition of velocities is a logical consequence of T and S. If this formula does not hold, then at least one of T and S must be false! Of course, I have still not given you any real evidence to doubt (1.1) – I have only heavily foreshadowed that this will come. It is a good idea to start thinking now, based on the observations we have just made, about how completely any such evidence will make us restructure our notions of reality. • Q: Where have we used T? • A: In considering events at the same time (i.e., at time t on the diagram above). • Q: Where have we used S? • A: In implicitly assuming that d BC is same as measured by anyone (A,B, or C). 1.5 Newton’s Laws: Are all reference frames equal? The above analysis was true for all reference frames. It made no difference how the clock that defines the reference frame was moving.
1.6. HOW CAN YOU TELL IF AN OBJECT IS IN AN INERTIAL FRAME?35 However, one of the discoveries of Newtonian Physics was that not all reference frames are in fact equivalent. There is a special set of reference frames that are called Inertial Frames. This concept will be extremely important for us throughout the course. Here’s the idea: Before Einstein, physicists believed that the behavior of almost everything (baseballs, ice skaters, rockets, planets, gyroscopes, bridges, arms, legs, cells, ...) was governed by three rules called ‘Newton’s Laws of Motion.’ The basic point was to relate the motion of objects to the ‘forces’ that act on that object. These laws picked out certain reference frames as special. The first law has to do with what happens when there are no forces. Consider someone in the middle of a perfectly smooth, slippery ice rink. An isolated object in the middle of a slippery ice rink experiences zero force in the horizontal direction. Now, what will happen to such a person? What if they are moving? Newton’s first law of motion: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames) in which an object moves in a straight line at constant speed (at time t) if and only if zero (net) force acts on that object at time t. ⋆⋆ Note: When physicists speak about velocity this includes both the speed and the direction of motion. So, we can restate this as: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames) in which the velocity of any object is constant (at time t) if and only if zero net force acts on that object at time t. ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ This is really an operational definition for an inertial frame. Any frame in which the above is true is called inertial. ⋆ The qualifier ‘net’ (in ‘net force’ above) means that there might be two or more forces acting on the object, but that they all counteract each other and cancel out. An object experiencing zero net force behaves identically to one experiencing no forces at all. We can restate Newton’s first law as: Object A moves at constant velocity in an inertial frame ⇔ Object A experiences zero net force. Here the symbol (⇔) means ‘is equivalent to the statement that.’ Trust me, it is good to encapsulate this awkward statement in a single symbol. 1.6 How can you tell if an object is in an inertial frame? Recall Newton’s first Law: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames). If object A’s frame is inertial, then object A will measure object B to
- Page 1: Notes on Relativit
- Page 4 and 5: 4 CONTENTS 2.3 Homework Problems .
- Page 6 and 7: 6 CONTENTS 8 General Relativity and
- Page 8 and 9: 8 CONTENTS
- Page 10 and 11: 10 CONTENTS While I have worked to
- Page 12 and 13: 12 CONTENTS way you deal with almos
- Page 14 and 15: 14 CONTENTS but this does not mean
- Page 16 and 17: 16 CONTENTS 0.3 Coursework and Grad
- Page 18 and 19: 18 CONTENTS d) include references t
- Page 20 and 21: 20 CONTENTS However, your challenge
- Page 22 and 23: 22 CONTENTS 0.4 Some Suggestions fo
- Page 24 and 25: 24 CONTENTS Course Calendar The fol
- Page 26 and 27: 26 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 28 and 29: 28 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 30 and 31: 30 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 32 and 33: 32 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 36 and 37: 36 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 38 and 39: 38 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 40 and 41: 40 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 42 and 43: 42 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWT
- Page 44 and 45: 44 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 46 and 47: 46 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 48 and 49: 48 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 50 and 51: 50 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 52 and 53: 52 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 54 and 55: 54 CHAPTER 2. MAXWELL, E&M, AND THE
- Page 56 and 57: 56 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 58 and 59: 58 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 60 and 61: 60 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 62 and 63: 62 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 64 and 65: 64 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 66 and 67: 66 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 68 and 69: 68 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 70 and 71: 70 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 72 and 73: 72 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 74 and 75: 74 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 76 and 77: 76 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 78 and 79: 78 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 80 and 81: 80 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 82 and 83: 82 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
1.6. HOW CAN YOU TELL IF AN OBJECT IS IN AN INERTIAL FRAME?35<br />
However, <strong>on</strong>e of the discoveries of Newt<strong>on</strong>ian <strong>Physics</strong> was that not all reference<br />
frames are in fact equivalent. There is a special set of reference frames that<br />
are called Inertial Frames. This c<strong>on</strong>cept will be extremely important for us<br />
throughout the course.<br />
Here’s the idea:<br />
Before Einstein, physicists believed that the behavior of almost everything<br />
(baseballs, ice skaters, rockets, planets, gyroscopes, bridges, arms, legs, cells,<br />
...) was governed by three rules called ‘Newt<strong>on</strong>’s Laws of Moti<strong>on</strong>.’ The basic<br />
point was to relate the moti<strong>on</strong> of objects to the ‘forces’ that act <strong>on</strong> that object.<br />
These laws picked out certain reference frames as special.<br />
The first law has to do with what happens when there are no forces. C<strong>on</strong>sider<br />
some<strong>on</strong>e in the middle of a perfectly smooth, slippery ice rink. An isolated<br />
object in the middle of a slippery ice rink experiences zero force in the horiz<strong>on</strong>tal<br />
directi<strong>on</strong>. Now, what will happen to such a pers<strong>on</strong>? What if they are moving?<br />
Newt<strong>on</strong>’s first law of moti<strong>on</strong>:<br />
There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames) in which an<br />
object moves in a straight line at c<strong>on</strong>stant speed (at time t) if <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly if zero<br />
(net) force acts <strong>on</strong> that object at time t.<br />
⋆⋆ Note: When physicists speak about velocity this includes both the speed<br />
<strong>and</strong> the directi<strong>on</strong> of moti<strong>on</strong>. So, we can restate this as: There exists a class of<br />
reference frames (called inertial frames) in which the velocity of any object is<br />
c<strong>on</strong>stant (at time t) if <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly if zero net force acts <strong>on</strong> that object at time t.<br />
⋆ ⋆ ⋆ This is really an operati<strong>on</strong>al definiti<strong>on</strong> for an inertial frame. Any frame in<br />
which the above is true is called inertial.<br />
⋆ The qualifier ‘net’ (in ‘net force’ above) means that there might be two or<br />
more forces acting <strong>on</strong> the object, but that they all counteract each other <strong>and</strong><br />
cancel out. An object experiencing zero net force behaves identically to <strong>on</strong>e<br />
experiencing no forces at all.<br />
We can restate Newt<strong>on</strong>’s first law as:<br />
Object A moves at c<strong>on</strong>stant velocity in an inertial frame ⇔ Object A<br />
experiences zero net force.<br />
Here the symbol (⇔) means ‘is equivalent to the statement that.’ Trust me, it<br />
is good to encapsulate this awkward statement in a single symbol.<br />
1.6 How can you tell if an object is in an inertial<br />
frame?<br />
Recall Newt<strong>on</strong>’s first Law: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial<br />
frames). If object A’s frame is inertial, then object A will measure object B to