Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

web.physics.ucsb.edu
from web.physics.ucsb.edu More from this publisher
27.09.2014 Views

34 CHAPTER 1. SPACE, TIME, AND NEWTONIAN PHYSICS A V BA t V CB t V CA B t C time t WLOG, take t=0 here At time t, the separation between A and C is V CA t, but we see from the diagram that it is is also V CB t + V BA t. Canceling the t’s, we have V CA = V CB + V BA . (1.2) QED ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ Now, our instructions about how to draw the diagram (from the facts that our ideas about time and position are well-defined) came from assumptions T and S, so the Newtonian formula for the addition of velocities is a logical consequence of T and S. If this formula does not hold, then at least one of T and S must be false! Of course, I have still not given you any real evidence to doubt (1.1) – I have only heavily foreshadowed that this will come. It is a good idea to start thinking now, based on the observations we have just made, about how completely any such evidence will make us restructure our notions of reality. • Q: Where have we used T? • A: In considering events at the same time (i.e., at time t on the diagram above). • Q: Where have we used S? • A: In implicitly assuming that d BC is same as measured by anyone (A,B, or C). 1.5 Newton’s Laws: Are all reference frames equal? The above analysis was true for all reference frames. It made no difference how the clock that defines the reference frame was moving.

1.6. HOW CAN YOU TELL IF AN OBJECT IS IN AN INERTIAL FRAME?35 However, one of the discoveries of Newtonian Physics was that not all reference frames are in fact equivalent. There is a special set of reference frames that are called Inertial Frames. This concept will be extremely important for us throughout the course. Here’s the idea: Before Einstein, physicists believed that the behavior of almost everything (baseballs, ice skaters, rockets, planets, gyroscopes, bridges, arms, legs, cells, ...) was governed by three rules called ‘Newton’s Laws of Motion.’ The basic point was to relate the motion of objects to the ‘forces’ that act on that object. These laws picked out certain reference frames as special. The first law has to do with what happens when there are no forces. Consider someone in the middle of a perfectly smooth, slippery ice rink. An isolated object in the middle of a slippery ice rink experiences zero force in the horizontal direction. Now, what will happen to such a person? What if they are moving? Newton’s first law of motion: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames) in which an object moves in a straight line at constant speed (at time t) if and only if zero (net) force acts on that object at time t. ⋆⋆ Note: When physicists speak about velocity this includes both the speed and the direction of motion. So, we can restate this as: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames) in which the velocity of any object is constant (at time t) if and only if zero net force acts on that object at time t. ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ This is really an operational definition for an inertial frame. Any frame in which the above is true is called inertial. ⋆ The qualifier ‘net’ (in ‘net force’ above) means that there might be two or more forces acting on the object, but that they all counteract each other and cancel out. An object experiencing zero net force behaves identically to one experiencing no forces at all. We can restate Newton’s first law as: Object A moves at constant velocity in an inertial frame ⇔ Object A experiences zero net force. Here the symbol (⇔) means ‘is equivalent to the statement that.’ Trust me, it is good to encapsulate this awkward statement in a single symbol. 1.6 How can you tell if an object is in an inertial frame? Recall Newton’s first Law: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames). If object A’s frame is inertial, then object A will measure object B to

1.6. HOW CAN YOU TELL IF AN OBJECT IS IN AN INERTIAL FRAME?35<br />

However, <strong>on</strong>e of the discoveries of Newt<strong>on</strong>ian <strong>Physics</strong> was that not all reference<br />

frames are in fact equivalent. There is a special set of reference frames that<br />

are called Inertial Frames. This c<strong>on</strong>cept will be extremely important for us<br />

throughout the course.<br />

Here’s the idea:<br />

Before Einstein, physicists believed that the behavior of almost everything<br />

(baseballs, ice skaters, rockets, planets, gyroscopes, bridges, arms, legs, cells,<br />

...) was governed by three rules called ‘Newt<strong>on</strong>’s Laws of Moti<strong>on</strong>.’ The basic<br />

point was to relate the moti<strong>on</strong> of objects to the ‘forces’ that act <strong>on</strong> that object.<br />

These laws picked out certain reference frames as special.<br />

The first law has to do with what happens when there are no forces. C<strong>on</strong>sider<br />

some<strong>on</strong>e in the middle of a perfectly smooth, slippery ice rink. An isolated<br />

object in the middle of a slippery ice rink experiences zero force in the horiz<strong>on</strong>tal<br />

directi<strong>on</strong>. Now, what will happen to such a pers<strong>on</strong>? What if they are moving?<br />

Newt<strong>on</strong>’s first law of moti<strong>on</strong>:<br />

There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial frames) in which an<br />

object moves in a straight line at c<strong>on</strong>stant speed (at time t) if <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly if zero<br />

(net) force acts <strong>on</strong> that object at time t.<br />

⋆⋆ Note: When physicists speak about velocity this includes both the speed<br />

<strong>and</strong> the directi<strong>on</strong> of moti<strong>on</strong>. So, we can restate this as: There exists a class of<br />

reference frames (called inertial frames) in which the velocity of any object is<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stant (at time t) if <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly if zero net force acts <strong>on</strong> that object at time t.<br />

⋆ ⋆ ⋆ This is really an operati<strong>on</strong>al definiti<strong>on</strong> for an inertial frame. Any frame in<br />

which the above is true is called inertial.<br />

⋆ The qualifier ‘net’ (in ‘net force’ above) means that there might be two or<br />

more forces acting <strong>on</strong> the object, but that they all counteract each other <strong>and</strong><br />

cancel out. An object experiencing zero net force behaves identically to <strong>on</strong>e<br />

experiencing no forces at all.<br />

We can restate Newt<strong>on</strong>’s first law as:<br />

Object A moves at c<strong>on</strong>stant velocity in an inertial frame ⇔ Object A<br />

experiences zero net force.<br />

Here the symbol (⇔) means ‘is equivalent to the statement that.’ Trust me, it<br />

is good to encapsulate this awkward statement in a single symbol.<br />

1.6 How can you tell if an object is in an inertial<br />

frame?<br />

Recall Newt<strong>on</strong>’s first Law: There exists a class of reference frames (called inertial<br />

frames). If object A’s frame is inertial, then object A will measure object B to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!