27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

302 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY<br />

Infinite Future<br />

Dei<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong><br />

Now<br />

Big Bang Singularity<br />

The regi<strong>on</strong>s we see at decoupling now have past light c<strong>on</strong>es that overlap quite a<br />

bit. So, they have access to much of the same informati<strong>on</strong> from the singularity.<br />

In this picture, it is easier to underst<strong>and</strong> how these entire universe could be at<br />

close to the same temperature at decoupling.<br />

Oh, to be c<strong>on</strong>sistent with what we know, this huge cosmological ‘c<strong>on</strong>stant’ has<br />

to shut itself off l<strong>on</strong>g before decoupling. This is the hard part about making<br />

inflati<strong>on</strong> work. Making the cosmological c<strong>on</strong>stant turn off requires an amount of<br />

fine tuning that many people feel is comparable to the <strong>on</strong>e part in <strong>on</strong>e-hundred<br />

thous<strong>and</strong> level of inhomogeneities that inflati<strong>on</strong> was designed to explain.<br />

Luckily, inflati<strong>on</strong> makes certain predicti<strong>on</strong>s about the detailed form of the cosmic<br />

microwave background. The modern ballo<strong>on</strong> experiments are beginning to probe<br />

the interesting regime of accuracy, <strong>and</strong> it is hoped that MAP <strong>and</strong> PLANCK will<br />

have some definitive commentary <strong>on</strong> whether inflati<strong>on</strong> is or is not the correct<br />

explanati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

10.4.4 Looking for mass in all the wr<strong>on</strong>g places<br />

Actually, there is a third chapter in our discussi<strong>on</strong> of the cosmological c<strong>on</strong>stant.<br />

You see, it turns out that the supernovae results <strong>and</strong> the CMB do not really<br />

measure Λ directly, but instead link the cosmological c<strong>on</strong>stant to the overall<br />

density of matter in the universe. So, to get a real h<strong>and</strong>le <strong>on</strong> things, <strong>on</strong>e has to<br />

know the density of more or less regular matter in the universe as well.<br />

Before we get into how much matter there actually is (<strong>and</strong> how we find out),<br />

I need to tell you about the somewhat funny language that cosmologists use<br />

to discuss this questi<strong>on</strong>. To get the idea, I’ll need to bring back the Einstein<br />

equati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> this time I’ll add in a part to describe the cosmological c<strong>on</strong>stant.<br />

As a change from before though, I’ll write it in terms of the Hubble expansi<strong>on</strong><br />

rate H = 1 da<br />

a dt .<br />

H 2 − 8πGρ<br />

3<br />

− Λ 3 + ka−2 c 2 = 0. (10.6)<br />

The cosmologists like to reorganize this equati<strong>on</strong> by dividing by H 2 . This gives

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!