27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

300 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY<br />

these tiny inhomogeneities from the first experiment (a satellite called COBE)<br />

to measure them.<br />

This, by the way, illustrates an important point about the early universe. It<br />

was not like what we would get if we simply took the universe now <strong>and</strong> made<br />

all of the galaxies come together instead of rushing apart. If we pushed all of<br />

the galaxies together we would, for example, end up with a lot of big clumps<br />

(some related to galactic black holes, for example). While there would be a lot<br />

of general mushing about, we would not expect the result to be anywhere near<br />

as homogeneous as <strong>on</strong>e part in <strong>on</strong>e hundred thous<strong>and</strong>.<br />

It appears then that the universe started in a very special, very uniform state<br />

with <strong>on</strong>ly very tiny fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s in its density. So then, why are there such large<br />

clumps of stuff today? Today, the universe is far from homogeneous <strong>on</strong> the small<br />

scale. The reas<strong>on</strong> for this is that gravity tends to cause matter to clump over<br />

time. Places with a little higher density pull together gravitati<strong>on</strong>ally <strong>and</strong> become<br />

even more dense, pulling in material from neighboring under-dense regi<strong>on</strong>s so<br />

that they become less dense. It turns out that tiny variati<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>on</strong>e part in<br />

<strong>on</strong>e hundred thous<strong>and</strong> back at decoupling are just the right size to grow into<br />

roughly galaxy-style clumps today. This is an interesting fact by itself: Galaxies<br />

do not require special ‘seeds’ to start up. They are the natural c<strong>on</strong>sequence of<br />

gravity amplifying teeny tiny variati<strong>on</strong>s in density in an exp<strong>and</strong>ing universe.<br />

Well, that’s the rough story anyway. Making all of this work in detail is a<br />

little more complicated, <strong>and</strong> the details do depend <strong>on</strong> the values of Λ, k, <strong>and</strong><br />

so <strong>on</strong>. As a result, if <strong>on</strong>e can measure the CMB with precisi<strong>on</strong>, this becomes<br />

an independent measurement of the various cosmological parameters. The data<br />

from COBE c<strong>on</strong>firmed the whole general picture <strong>and</strong> put some c<strong>on</strong>straints <strong>on</strong><br />

Λ. The results were c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the supernova observati<strong>on</strong>s, but by itself<br />

COBE was not enough to measure Λ accurately. A number of recent ballo<strong>on</strong>based<br />

CMB experiments have improved the situati<strong>on</strong> somewhat, <strong>and</strong> in the next<br />

few years two more satellite experiments (MAP <strong>and</strong> PLANCK) will measure the<br />

CMB in great detail. Astrophysicists are eagerly awaiting the results.<br />

10.4.3 A cosmological ‘Problem’<br />

Actually, the extreme homogeneity of the CMB raises another issue: how could<br />

the universe have ever been so homogeneous? For example, when we point our<br />

radio dish at <strong>on</strong>e directi<strong>on</strong> in the sky, we measure a microwave signal at 2.7<br />

Kelvin coming to us from ten billi<strong>on</strong> light-years away. Now, when we point our<br />

radio dish in the opposite directi<strong>on</strong>, we measure a microwave signal at the same<br />

temperature (to within <strong>on</strong>e part in <strong>on</strong>e hundred thous<strong>and</strong>) coming at us from<br />

ten billi<strong>on</strong> light-years away in the opposite directi<strong>on</strong>! Now, how did those two<br />

points so far apart know that they should be at exactly the same temperature?<br />

Ah! You might say, “Didn’t the universe used to be a lot smaller, so that those<br />

two points were a lot closer together?” This is true, but it turns out not to help.<br />

The point is that all of the models we have been discussing have a singularity<br />

where the universe shrinks to zero size at very early times. An important fact is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!