Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
264 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES way that these black holes were found was that astronomers found certain stars which seemed to be emitting a lot of high energy x-rays. This is an unusual thing for a star to do, but it is not so odd for a black hole (as we will discuss shortly). On closer inspection of the star, it was found that the star appeared to “wobble” back and forth. This is just what the star would seem to do if it was in fact orbiting close to a small massive dark object that could not be seen directly. This is why they are called binary systems, since there seem to be two objects in the system. These massive dark objects have masses between 5 and 10 solar masses. Actually, there are also cases where the dark companion has a mass of less then 2 solar masses, but those are known to be neutron stars (see below). We had a discussion in the previous section about how our knowledge of normal matter led to the conclusion that Sagittarius A ∗ is a black hole. Well, we also have a pretty good idea of how star-like objects work in the solar mass range. In actual stars, what happens is that the objects become dense enough that nuclear fusion occurs. This generates large amounts of heat that increases the pressure in the matter (remember the ideal gas law?) far above what it would be otherwise. It is this pressure that keeps the object from collapsing to higher density. Thus, the reason that a star has a relatively low density (the average density of the sun is a few times that of water) is that it is very hot! This of course is also the reason that stars shine. Now, the dark companions in the binary systems do not shine. It follows that they are not hot. As a result, they must be much smaller and much more dense. Our understanding of physics tells us that massive cold objects will collapse under their own weight. In particular, a cold object greater than 1.4 times the mass of the sun will not be a star at all. It will be so dense that the electrons will be crushed into the atomic nuclei, with the result that they will be absorbed into the protons and electron + proton will turn into a neutron. Thus the object ceases to be normal matter (with electrons, protons, and neutrons) at all, but becomes just a big bunch of neutrons. This number of 1.4 solar masses is called the Chandrasekhar limit after the physicist who discovered it. In practice, when we look at the vast numbers of stars in the universe, we have never found a cold star of more than 1.4 solar masses though we have found some that are close. So, any cold object of more than 1.4 solar masses must be at least as strange as a big bunch of neutrons. Well, neutrons can be packed very tightly without resistance, so that in fact such ‘neutron stars’ naturally have the density of an atomic nucleus. What this means is that one can think of a neutron star as being essentially one incredibly massive atomic nucleus (but will all neutrons and no protons). The density of an atomic nucleus is a huge 10 18 kg/m 3 . (This is 10 15 times that of normal matter.) Let us ask: suppose we had a round ball of nuclear matter at this density. How massive would this ball need to be for the associated Schwarzschild radius to be larger than the ball itself? The answer is about 4 times the mass of the sun. So, working with a very simple model in which the density is constant (and always equal to the density of normal nuclei, which are
9.5. BLACK HOLE ASTROPHYSICS AND OBSERVATIONS 265 under significantly less pressure) inside the object, we find that any cold object with a mass greater than four solar masses will be a black hole! It turns out that any model where the density increases with depth and pressure yields an even stronger bound. As a result, modern calculations predict that any cold object with a mass of greater than 2.1 solar masses will be a black hole. As one can see from the observational data in the handout, the dark companions in the binary systems all have masses significantly greater than 2 solar masses. By the way, it is reassuring to note that every neutron star that has been found has been in the range between 1.4 and 2.1 solar masses. 9.5.3 A few words on Accretion and Energy Even with the above arguments, one might ask what direct measurements could be made of the size of the dark companions. Can we show directly that their size is comparable to the Schwarzschild radius? To do so one needs to use the energy being released from matter falling into a black hole. This leads us to a brief discussion of what are called accretion disks. The idea is shown on one of the pictures that I have handed out. In general, matter tends to flow into black holes. This addition of matter to an object is called “accretion.” Black holes (and neutron stars) are very small, so that a piece of matter from far away that becomes caught in the gravitational field is not likely to be directed straight at the black hole or neutron star, but instead is likely to go into some kind of orbit around it. The matter piles up in such orbits and then, due to various interactions between the bits of matter, some bits slowly loose angular momentum and move closer and closer to the center. Eventually, they either fall through the horizon of the black hole or hit the surface of the neutron star. In cases where the compact object is in a binary system, the matter flowing in comes mostly from the shining star. This process makes the accreting matter into a disk, as shown in the picture 8 below. This is why astronomers often talk about ‘accretion disks’ around black holes and neutron stars. 8 This picture was created by Jillian Bornak, a past PHY312 student.
- Page 214 and 215: 214 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 216 and 217: 216 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 218 and 219: 218 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 220 and 221: 220 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 222 and 223: 222 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 224 and 225: 224 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 226 and 227: 226 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 228 and 229: 228 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES of gravi
- Page 230 and 231: 230 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES However,
- Page 232 and 233: 232 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES require
- Page 234 and 235: 234 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES √ dr r
- Page 236 and 237: 236 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Future I
- Page 238 and 239: 238 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = R s
- Page 240 and 241: 240 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r < R s
- Page 242 and 243: 242 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES this: Fi
- Page 244 and 245: 244 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Well, ou
- Page 246 and 247: 246 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES finite p
- Page 248 and 249: 248 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = R s
- Page 250 and 251: 250 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Now that
- Page 252 and 253: 252 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES the firs
- Page 254 and 255: 254 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES through
- Page 256 and 257: 256 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES this lin
- Page 258 and 259: 258 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Believe
- Page 260 and 261: 260 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES you tie
- Page 262 and 263: 262 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES universe
- Page 266 and 267: 266 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Now, an
- Page 268 and 269: 268 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES 9.6 Blac
- Page 270 and 271: 270 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES The poin
- Page 272 and 273: 272 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = 0 r
- Page 274 and 275: 274 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES In this
- Page 276 and 277: 276 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Some of
- Page 278 and 279: 278 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES (c) In t
- Page 280 and 281: 280 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = R s
- Page 282 and 283: 282 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES (c) What
- Page 284 and 285: 284 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY Well, the
- Page 286 and 287: 286 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY 3. The th
- Page 288 and 289: 288 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY a a = 1 T
- Page 290 and 291: 290 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY -1 -2 0 1
- Page 292 and 293: 292 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY ( ) 2 3 d
- Page 294 and 295: 294 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY Since P =
- Page 296 and 297: 296 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY 10.4 Obse
- Page 298 and 299: 298 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY 10.4.2 On
- Page 300 and 301: 300 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY these tin
- Page 302 and 303: 302 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY Infinite
- Page 304 and 305: 304 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY clumped t
- Page 306 and 307: 306 CHAPTER 10. COSMOLOGY these exp
9.5. BLACK HOLE ASTROPHYSICS AND OBSERVATIONS 265<br />
under significantly less pressure) inside the object, we find that any cold object<br />
with a mass greater than four solar masses will be a black hole! It turns out<br />
that any model where the density increases with depth <strong>and</strong> pressure yields an<br />
even str<strong>on</strong>ger bound. As a result, modern calculati<strong>on</strong>s predict that any cold<br />
object with a mass of greater than 2.1 solar masses will be a black hole.<br />
As <strong>on</strong>e can see from the observati<strong>on</strong>al data in the h<strong>and</strong>out, the dark compani<strong>on</strong>s<br />
in the binary systems all have masses significantly greater than 2 solar masses.<br />
By the way, it is reassuring to note that every neutr<strong>on</strong> star that has been found<br />
has been in the range between 1.4 <strong>and</strong> 2.1 solar masses.<br />
9.5.3 A few words <strong>on</strong> Accreti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> Energy<br />
Even with the above arguments, <strong>on</strong>e might ask what direct measurements could<br />
be made of the size of the dark compani<strong>on</strong>s. Can we show directly that their<br />
size is comparable to the Schwarzschild radius? To do so <strong>on</strong>e needs to use the<br />
energy being released from matter falling into a black hole. This leads us to a<br />
brief discussi<strong>on</strong> of what are called accreti<strong>on</strong> disks.<br />
The idea is shown <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e of the pictures that I have h<strong>and</strong>ed out. In general,<br />
matter tends to flow into black holes. This additi<strong>on</strong> of matter to an object is<br />
called “accreti<strong>on</strong>.” Black holes (<strong>and</strong> neutr<strong>on</strong> stars) are very small, so that a<br />
piece of matter from far away that becomes caught in the gravitati<strong>on</strong>al field is<br />
not likely to be directed straight at the black hole or neutr<strong>on</strong> star, but instead<br />
is likely to go into some kind of orbit around it. The matter piles up in such<br />
orbits <strong>and</strong> then, due to various interacti<strong>on</strong>s between the bits of matter, some<br />
bits slowly loose angular momentum <strong>and</strong> move closer <strong>and</strong> closer to the center.<br />
Eventually, they either fall through the horiz<strong>on</strong> of the black hole or hit the<br />
surface of the neutr<strong>on</strong> star.<br />
In cases where the compact object is in a binary system, the matter flowing in<br />
comes mostly from the shining star. This process makes the accreting matter<br />
into a disk, as shown in the picture 8 below. This is why astr<strong>on</strong>omers often talk<br />
about ‘accreti<strong>on</strong> disks’ around black holes <strong>and</strong> neutr<strong>on</strong> stars.<br />
8 This picture was created by Jillian Bornak, a past PHY312 student.