27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.5. BLACK HOLE ASTROPHYSICS AND OBSERVATIONS 261<br />

a 2 s/c 2 = c2 4<br />

(<br />

Rs<br />

r 2 ) 2<br />

(1 − R s /r) −1 . (9.43)<br />

To evaluate the relative accelerati<strong>on</strong>, equati<strong>on</strong> (9.38) tells us to add these<br />

two results together. Clearly, there is a major cancellati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> all that we have<br />

left is:<br />

( )<br />

relative accelerati<strong>on</strong> = c 2 Rs<br />

r 3 L. (9.44)<br />

This gives the relative accelerati<strong>on</strong> of two freely falling observers who, at that<br />

moment, are at rest with respect to the static observers. (The free fallers are<br />

also located at radius r <strong>and</strong> are separated by a radial distance L, which is much<br />

smaller than r.) The formula holds anywhere that the Schwarzschild metric<br />

applies. In particular, anywhere outside a black hole.<br />

Now for the questi<strong>on</strong> you have all been waiting for .... what happens at the<br />

horiz<strong>on</strong> (or, perhaps just barely outside)? Well, this is just r = R s . In this case,<br />

equati<strong>on</strong> (9.44) reads<br />

( ) L<br />

relative accelerati<strong>on</strong> = c 2 R 2 . (9.45)<br />

s<br />

The most important thing to notice about this formula is that the answer is<br />

finite. Despite the fact that a static observer at the horiz<strong>on</strong> would need an<br />

infinite accelerati<strong>on</strong> relative to the free fallers, any two free fallers have <strong>on</strong>ly a<br />

finite accelerati<strong>on</strong> relative to each other.<br />

The sec<strong>on</strong>d thing to notice is that, for a big black hole (large R s ), this relative<br />

accelerati<strong>on</strong> is even small. (However, for a small black hole, it can be rather<br />

large.) I’ll let you plug in numbers <strong>on</strong> your own <strong>and</strong> see how the results come<br />

out. Have fun!<br />

9.5 Black Hole Astrophysics <strong>and</strong> Observati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

We have now come to underst<strong>and</strong> basic round (Schwarzschild) black holes fairly<br />

well. We have obtained several perspectives <strong>on</strong> black hole exteriors <strong>and</strong> interiors<br />

<strong>and</strong> we have also learned about black hole singularities. However, there are<br />

several issues associated with black holes that we have yet to discuss. Not least<br />

of these is the observati<strong>on</strong>al evidence that indicates that black holes actually<br />

exist! This secti<strong>on</strong> will be devoted to this evidence <strong>and</strong> to the physics that<br />

surrounds it.<br />

9.5.1 The observati<strong>on</strong>al evidence for black holes<br />

We argued back in secti<strong>on</strong> 9.2.1 that big black holes should not be too hard<br />

to make. So, the questi<strong>on</strong> arises, are there really such things out there in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!