Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

web.physics.ucsb.edu
from web.physics.ucsb.edu More from this publisher
27.09.2014 Views

238 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = R s r = R s t r oo r = R s Here, I have used arrows to indicate the direction in which the time coordinate t increases on this diagram. Not only do light rays directed along the horizon remain at r = R s , any light ray at the horizon which is directed a little bit sideways (and not perfectly straight outward) cannot even stay at r = R s , but must move to smaller r. The diagram below illustrates this by showing the horizon as a surface made up of light rays. If we look at a light cone emitted from a point on this surface, only the light ray that is moving in the same direction as the rays on the horizon can stay in the surface. The other light rays all fall behind the surface and end up inside the black hole (at r < R s ). Similarly, any object of nonzero mass requires an infinite acceleration (directed straight outward) to remain at the horizon. With any finite acceleration, the object falls to smaller values of r. At any value of r less than R s no object can ever escape from the black hole. This is clear from the above spacetime

9.3. BEYOND THE HORIZON 239 diagram, since to move from the future interior to, say, the right exterior the object would have to cross the light ray at r = R s , which is not possible. Note that we could have started with this geometric insight at the horizon and used it to argue for the existence of the photon sphere: Light aimed sideways around the black hole escapes when started far away but falls in at the horizon. Somewhere in the middle must be a transition point where the light neither escapes nor falls in. Instead, it simply circles the black hole forever at the same value of r. 9.3 Beyond the Horizon Of course, the question that everyone would like to answer is “What the heck is going on inside the black hole?” To understand this, we will turn again to the Schwarzschild metric. In this section we will explore the issue in quite a bit of detail and obtain several useful perspectives. 9.3.1 The interior diagram To make things simple, let’s suppose that all motion takes place in the r, t plane. This means that dθ = dφ = 0, and we can ignore those parts of the metric. The relevant pieces are just ds 2 = −(1 − R s /r)dt 2 + dr 2 1 − R s /r . (9.16) Let’s think for a moment about a line of constant r (with dr = 0). For such a line, ds 2 = −(1 − R s /r)dt 2 . The interesting thing is that, for r < R s , this is positive. Thus, for r < R s , a line of constant r is spacelike. You will therefore not be surprised to find that, near the horizon, the lines of constant r are just like the hyperbolae that are a constant proper time from where the two horizons meet. Below, I have drawn a spacetime diagram in a reference frame that is in free fall near the horizon.

9.3. BEYOND THE HORIZON 239<br />

diagram, since to move from the future interior to, say, the right exterior the<br />

object would have to cross the light ray at r = R s , which is not possible.<br />

Note that we could have started with this geometric insight at the horiz<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

used it to argue for the existence of the phot<strong>on</strong> sphere: Light aimed sideways<br />

around the black hole escapes when started far away but falls in at the horiz<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Somewhere in the middle must be a transiti<strong>on</strong> point where the light neither<br />

escapes nor falls in. Instead, it simply circles the black hole forever at the same<br />

value of r.<br />

9.3 Bey<strong>on</strong>d the Horiz<strong>on</strong><br />

Of course, the questi<strong>on</strong> that every<strong>on</strong>e would like to answer is “What the heck is<br />

going <strong>on</strong> inside the black hole?” To underst<strong>and</strong> this, we will turn again to the<br />

Schwarzschild metric. In this secti<strong>on</strong> we will explore the issue in quite a bit of<br />

detail <strong>and</strong> obtain several useful perspectives.<br />

9.3.1 The interior diagram<br />

To make things simple, let’s suppose that all moti<strong>on</strong> takes place in the r, t plane.<br />

This means that dθ = dφ = 0, <strong>and</strong> we can ignore those parts of the metric. The<br />

relevant pieces are just<br />

ds 2 = −(1 − R s /r)dt 2 +<br />

dr 2<br />

1 − R s /r . (9.16)<br />

Let’s think for a moment about a line of c<strong>on</strong>stant r (with dr = 0). For such<br />

a line, ds 2 = −(1 − R s /r)dt 2 . The interesting thing is that, for r < R s , this is<br />

positive. Thus, for r < R s , a line of c<strong>on</strong>stant r is spacelike. You will therefore<br />

not be surprised to find that, near the horiz<strong>on</strong>, the lines of c<strong>on</strong>stant r are just<br />

like the hyperbolae that are a c<strong>on</strong>stant proper time from where the two horiz<strong>on</strong>s<br />

meet. Below, I have drawn a spacetime diagram in a reference frame that is in<br />

free fall near the horiz<strong>on</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!