Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

web.physics.ucsb.edu
from web.physics.ucsb.edu More from this publisher
27.09.2014 Views

220 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY AND CURVED SPACETIME However, this is not the end of the story. It turns out that there is also another effect which causes the ray to bend. This is due to the effect of the curvature of space on the light ray. This effect turns out to be exactly the same size as the first effect, and with the same sign. As a result, Einstein predicted a total bending angle of 1.75 seconds of arc – twice what would come just from the observation that light falls in a gravitational field. This is a tricky experiment to perform, because the Sun is bright enough that any star that close to the sun is very hard to see. One solution is to wait for a solar eclipse (when the moon pretty much blocks out the light from the sun itself) and then one can look at the stars nearby. Just such an observation was performed by the British physicist Sir Arthur Eddington in 1919. The result indicated a bending angle of right around 2 seconds of arc. More recently, much more accurate versions of this experiment have been performed which verify Einstein’s theory to high precision. See Theory and experiment in gravitational physics by Clifford M. Will, (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993) QC178.W47 1993 for a modern discussion of these issues. 8.5.3 Other experiments: Radar Time Delay The bending of starlight was the really big victory for Einstein’s theory. However, there are two other classic experimental tests of general relativity that should be mentioned. One of these is just the effect of gravity on the frequency of light that we have already discussed. As we said before, this had to wait quite a long time (until 1959) before technology progressed to the stage where it could be performed. The last major class of experiments is called ‘Radar Time delay.’ These turn out to be the most accurate tests of Einstein’s theory, but they had to wait until even more modern times. The point is that the gravitational field effects not only the path through space taken by a light ray, but that it also effects the time that the light ray takes to trace out that path. As we have discussed once or twice before, time measurements can be made extremely accurately. So, these experiments can be done to very high precision. The idea behind these experiments is that you then send a microwave (a.k.a. radar) signal (which is basically a long wavelength light wave) over to the other side of the sun and back. You can either bounce it off a planet (say, Venus) or a space probe that you have sent over there for just this purpose. If you measure the time it takes for the signal to go over and then return, this time is always longer than it would have been in flat spacetime. In this way, you can carefully test Einstein’s theory. For more details, see fig. 7.3 of Theory and experiment in gravitational physics by Clifford M. Will, (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993) QC178.W47 1993. There is a copy in the Physics Library. A less technical version of this book is Was Einstein Right? putting General Relativity to the test by Clifford M. Will (Basic Books, New York, 1993), also available in the Physics Library. You can also order a copy of this book from Amazon.com for about $15.

8.6. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS 221 8.6 Homework Problems The following problems provides practice in working with curved spaces (i.e., not space-times) and the corresponding metrics. 8-1. In this problem, you will explore four effects associated with curvature on each of 5 different spaces. The effects are subtle, so think about them thoroughly, and be sure to read the instructions carefully at each stage. The best way to work these problems is to actually build paper models (say, for the cone and cylinder) and to try to hold a sphere and a funnel shape in your hand while you work on those parts of this problem. I also suggest that you review the discussion in section 8.2 before beginning this problem. The five spaces are: i) Sphere ii) Cylinder iii) Cone iv) Double Funnel and v) This last one (see below) is a drawing by M.C. Escher. It is intended to represent a mathematical space first constructed by Lobachevski. The idea is that this is a ‘map’ of the space, and that all of the white fish below (and, similarly, all of the black fish) are really the same size and shape. They only look different because the geometry of the space being described does not match the (flat) geometry of the paper. This is just the phenomenon that we see all the time when we try to draw a flat map of the round earth. Inevitably, the continents get distorted – Greenland for example looks enormous on most maps of North America even though it is actually rather small.

8.6. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS 221<br />

8.6 Homework Problems<br />

The following problems provides practice in working with curved spaces (i.e.,<br />

not space-times) <strong>and</strong> the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding metrics.<br />

8-1. In this problem, you will explore four effects associated with curvature <strong>on</strong><br />

each of 5 different spaces. The effects are subtle, so think about them<br />

thoroughly, <strong>and</strong> be sure to read the instructi<strong>on</strong>s carefully at each stage.<br />

The best way to work these problems is to actually build paper models<br />

(say, for the c<strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> cylinder) <strong>and</strong> to try to hold a sphere <strong>and</strong> a funnel<br />

shape in your h<strong>and</strong> while you work <strong>on</strong> those parts of this problem. I also<br />

suggest that you review the discussi<strong>on</strong> in secti<strong>on</strong> 8.2 before beginning this<br />

problem.<br />

The five spaces are:<br />

i) Sphere ii) Cylinder iii) C<strong>on</strong>e iv) Double Funnel<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

v) This last <strong>on</strong>e (see below) is a drawing by M.C. Escher. It is intended<br />

to represent a mathematical space first c<strong>on</strong>structed by Lobachevski. The<br />

idea is that this is a ‘map’ of the space, <strong>and</strong> that all of the white fish<br />

below (<strong>and</strong>, similarly, all of the black fish) are really the same size <strong>and</strong><br />

shape. They <strong>on</strong>ly look different because the geometry of the space being<br />

described does not match the (flat) geometry of the paper. This is just<br />

the phenomen<strong>on</strong> that we see all the time when we try to draw a flat map<br />

of the round earth. Inevitably, the c<strong>on</strong>tinents get distorted – Greenl<strong>and</strong><br />

for example looks enormous <strong>on</strong> most maps of North America even though<br />

it is actually rather small.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!