27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

218 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY AND CURVED SPACETIME<br />

here) to look for new effects is close to the sun. One might therefore start by<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidering the orbit of Mercury.<br />

Actually, there is an interesting story about Mercury <strong>and</strong> its orbit. Astr<strong>on</strong>omers<br />

had been tracking the moti<strong>on</strong> of the planets for hundreds of years. Ever since<br />

Newt<strong>on</strong>, they had been comparing these moti<strong>on</strong>s to what Newt<strong>on</strong>’s law of gravity<br />

predicted.<br />

The agreement was incredible. In the early 1800’s, they had found small discrepancies<br />

(30 sec<strong>on</strong>ds of arc in 10 years) in the moti<strong>on</strong> of Uranus. For awhile<br />

people thought that Newt<strong>on</strong>’s law of gravity might not be exactly right. However,<br />

some<strong>on</strong>e then had the idea that maybe there were other objects out there<br />

whose gravity affected Uranus. They used Newt<strong>on</strong>’s law of gravity to predict<br />

the existence of new planets: Neptune, <strong>and</strong> later Pluto. They could even tell<br />

astr<strong>on</strong>omers where to look for Neptune within about a degree of angle <strong>on</strong> the<br />

sky.<br />

However, there was <strong>on</strong>e discrepancy with Newt<strong>on</strong>’s laws that the astr<strong>on</strong>omers<br />

could not explain. This was the ‘precessi<strong>on</strong>’ of Mercury’s orbit. The point is<br />

that, if there were nothing else around, Newt<strong>on</strong>’s law of gravity would say that<br />

Mercury would move in a perfect ellipse around the sun, retracing its path over,<br />

<strong>and</strong> over, <strong>and</strong> over...<br />

Mercury<br />

Sun<br />

Of course, there are small tugs <strong>on</strong> Mercury by the other planets that modify<br />

this behavior. However, the astr<strong>on</strong>omers knew how to account for these effects.<br />

Their results seemed to say that, even if the other planets <strong>and</strong> such were not<br />

around, Mercury would do a sort of spiral dance around the sun, following a<br />

path that looks more like this:<br />

Ellipse<br />

does<br />

not close<br />

Mercury<br />

Sun<br />

Here, I have drawn the ellipse itself as rotating (a.k.a. ‘precessing’) about the<br />

sun. After all known effects had been taken into account, astr<strong>on</strong>omers found<br />

that Mercury’s orbit precessed by an extra 43 sec<strong>on</strong>ds of arc per century. This is<br />

certainly not very much, but the astr<strong>on</strong>omers already understood all of the other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!