Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
208 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY AND CURVED SPACETIME y z ∆ x ∆ s ∆ z θ x In this case, the distances ∆x, ∆z, and ∆s are related in a slightly more complicated way. If you have studied much vector mathematics, you will have seen the relation: ∆s 2 = ∆x 2 + ∆z 2 + 2∆x∆z cosθ. (8.4) In vector notation, this is just |⃗x + ⃗z| 2 = |⃗x| 2 + |⃗z| 2 + 2⃗x · ⃗z. Even if you have not seen this relation before, it should make some sense to you. Note, for example, that if θ = 0 we get ∆s = 2∆x (since x and z are parallel and our ‘triangle’ is just a long straight line), while for θ = 180 o we get ∆s = 0 (since x and z now point in opposite directions and, in walking along the two sides of our triangle, we cover the same path twice in opposite directions, returning to our starting point.). For an infinitesimal triangle, we would write this as: ds 2 = dx 2 + dz 2 − 2dxdz cosθ. (8.5) So, the angular information lies in the “cross term” with a dxdz. The coefficient of this term tells us the angle between the x and z directions. 8.3.3 Metrics on Curved space This gives us an idea of what a metric on a general curved space should look like. After all, locally (i.e., infinitesimally) it should looks like one of the flat cases above! Thus, a general metric should have a part proportional to dx 2 , a part proportional to dy 2 , and a part proportional to dxdy. In general, we write this as: ds 2 = g xx dx 2 + 2g xy dxdy + g yy dy 2 . (8.6) What makes this metric different from the ones above (and therefore not necessarily flat) is that g xx , g xy , and g yy are in general functions of the coordinates x, y. In contrast, the functions were constants for the flat metrics above. Note that this fits with our idea that curved spaces are locally flat since, close to any particular point (x, y) the functions g xx , g xy , g yy will not deviate too much from the values at that point. In other words, any smooth function is locally constant.
8.3. GRAVITY AND THE METRIC 209 Now, why is there a 2 with the dxdy term? Note that since dxdy = dydx, there is no need to have a separate g yx term. The metric is always symmetric, with g yx = g xy . So, g xy dxdy + g yx dydx = 2g xy dxdy. If you are familiar with vectors, then I can tell you a bit more about how lengths and angles are encoded. Consider the ‘unit’ vectors ˆx and ŷ. By ‘unit’ vectors, I mean the vectors that go from x = 0 to x = 1 and from y = 0 to y = 1. As a result, their length is one in terms of the coordinates. This may or may not be the physical length of the vectors. For example, I might have decided to use coordinates with a tiny spacing (so that ˆx is very short) or coordinates with a huge spacing (so that ˆx is large). What the metric tells us directly are the dot products of these vectors: ˆx · ˆx = g xx , ˆx · ŷ = g xy , ŷ · ŷ = g yy . (8.7) Anyway, this object (g αβ ) is called the metric (or, the metric tensor) for the space. It tells us how to measure all lengths and angles. The corresponding object for a spacetime will tell us how to measure all proper lengths, proper times, angles, etc. It will be much the same except that it will have a time part with g tt negative 4 instead of positive, as did the flat Minkowski space. Rather than write out the entire expression (8.6) all of the time (especially when working in, say, four dimensions rather than just two) physicists use a condensed notation called the ‘Einstein summation convention’. To see how this works, let us first relabel our coordinates. Instead of using x and y, let’s use x 1 , x 2 with x 1 = x and x 2 = y. Then we have: ds 2 = 2∑ α=1 β=1 2∑ g αβ dx α dx β = g αβ dx α dx β . (8.8) It is in the last equality that we have used the Einstein summation convention – instead of writing out the summation signs, the convention is that we implicitly sum over any repeated index. 8.3.4 A first example To get a better feel for how the metric works, let’s look at the metric for a flat plane in polar coordinates (r, θ). It is useful to think about this in terms of the unit vectors ˆr, ˆθ. 4 More technically, g should have one negative and three positive eigenvalues at each point in spacetime.
- Page 158 and 159: 158 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 160 and 161: 160 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 162 and 163: 162 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 164 and 165: 164 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 166 and 167: 166 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 168 and 169: 168 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 170 and 171: 170 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 172 and 173: 172 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 174 and 175: 174 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 176 and 177: 176 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 178 and 179: 178 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 180 and 181: 180 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 182 and 183: 182 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 184 and 185: 184 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 186 and 187: 186 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 188 and 189: 188 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 190 and 191: 190 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 192 and 193: 192 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 194 and 195: 194 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 196 and 197: 196 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 198 and 199: 198 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 200 and 201: 200 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 202 and 203: 202 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 204 and 205: 204 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 206 and 207: 206 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 210 and 211: 210 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 212 and 213: 212 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 214 and 215: 214 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 216 and 217: 216 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 218 and 219: 218 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 220 and 221: 220 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 222 and 223: 222 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 224 and 225: 224 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 226 and 227: 226 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 228 and 229: 228 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES of gravi
- Page 230 and 231: 230 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES However,
- Page 232 and 233: 232 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES require
- Page 234 and 235: 234 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES √ dr r
- Page 236 and 237: 236 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Future I
- Page 238 and 239: 238 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = R s
- Page 240 and 241: 240 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r < R s
- Page 242 and 243: 242 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES this: Fi
- Page 244 and 245: 244 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Well, ou
- Page 246 and 247: 246 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES finite p
- Page 248 and 249: 248 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES r = R s
- Page 250 and 251: 250 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES Now that
- Page 252 and 253: 252 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES the firs
- Page 254 and 255: 254 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES through
- Page 256 and 257: 256 CHAPTER 9. BLACK HOLES this lin
8.3. GRAVITY AND THE METRIC 209<br />
Now, why is there a 2 with the dxdy term? Note that since dxdy = dydx, there<br />
is no need to have a separate g yx term. The metric is always symmetric, with<br />
g yx = g xy . So, g xy dxdy + g yx dydx = 2g xy dxdy.<br />
If you are familiar with vectors, then I can tell you a bit more about how lengths<br />
<strong>and</strong> angles are encoded. C<strong>on</strong>sider the ‘unit’ vectors ˆx <strong>and</strong> ŷ. By ‘unit’ vectors,<br />
I mean the vectors that go from x = 0 to x = 1 <strong>and</strong> from y = 0 to y = 1. As<br />
a result, their length is <strong>on</strong>e in terms of the coordinates. This may or may not<br />
be the physical length of the vectors. For example, I might have decided to use<br />
coordinates with a tiny spacing (so that ˆx is very short) or coordinates with a<br />
huge spacing (so that ˆx is large). What the metric tells us directly are the dot<br />
products of these vectors:<br />
ˆx · ˆx = g xx ,<br />
ˆx · ŷ = g xy ,<br />
ŷ · ŷ = g yy . (8.7)<br />
Anyway, this object (g αβ ) is called the metric (or, the metric tensor) for the<br />
space. It tells us how to measure all lengths <strong>and</strong> angles. The corresp<strong>on</strong>ding<br />
object for a spacetime will tell us how to measure all proper lengths, proper<br />
times, angles, etc. It will be much the same except that it will have a time part<br />
with g tt negative 4 instead of positive, as did the flat Minkowski space.<br />
Rather than write out the entire expressi<strong>on</strong> (8.6) all of the time (especially when<br />
working in, say, four dimensi<strong>on</strong>s rather than just two) physicists use a c<strong>on</strong>densed<br />
notati<strong>on</strong> called the ‘Einstein summati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>’. To see how this works, let<br />
us first relabel our coordinates. Instead of using x <strong>and</strong> y, let’s use x 1 , x 2 with<br />
x 1 = x <strong>and</strong> x 2 = y. Then we have:<br />
ds 2 =<br />
2∑<br />
α=1 β=1<br />
2∑<br />
g αβ dx α dx β = g αβ dx α dx β . (8.8)<br />
It is in the last equality that we have used the Einstein summati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> –<br />
instead of writing out the summati<strong>on</strong> signs, the c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> is that we implicitly<br />
sum over any repeated index.<br />
8.3.4 A first example<br />
To get a better feel for how the metric works, let’s look at the metric for a flat<br />
plane in polar coordinates (r, θ). It is useful to think about this in terms of the<br />
unit vectors ˆr, ˆθ.<br />
4 More technically, g should have <strong>on</strong>e negative <strong>and</strong> three positive eigenvalues at each point<br />
in spacetime.