27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.2. MORE ON CURVED SPACE 201<br />

turns out to create <strong>on</strong>ly a few. The point is that curvature is fundamentally<br />

associated with two-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al surfaces. Roughly speaking, the curvature of<br />

a four-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al spacetime (labelled by x, y, z, t) can be described in terms<br />

of xt curvature, yt curvature, etc. associated with two-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al bits of the<br />

spacetime. However, this is relativity, in which space <strong>and</strong> time act pretty much<br />

the same. So, if there is xt, yt, <strong>and</strong> zt curvature, there should also be xy,<br />

yz, <strong>and</strong> xz curvature! This means that the curvature can show up even if we<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sider <strong>on</strong>ly straight lines in space (determined, for example, by stretching out<br />

a string) in additi<strong>on</strong> to the effects <strong>on</strong> the moti<strong>on</strong> of objects that we have already<br />

discussed. For example, if we draw a picture showing spacelike straight lines<br />

(spacelike geodesics), it might look like this:<br />

Y<br />

Two geodesics<br />

X<br />

So, curved space is as much a part of gravity as is curved spacetime. This is nice,<br />

as curved spaces are easier to visualize. Let us now take a moment to explore<br />

these in more depth <strong>and</strong> build some intuiti<strong>on</strong> about curvature in general.<br />

Curved spaces have a number of fun properties. Some of my favorites are:<br />

C ≠ 2πR: The circumference of a circle is typically not 2π times its radius. Let<br />

us take an example: the equator is a circle <strong>on</strong> a sphere. What is it’s<br />

center? We are <strong>on</strong>ly supposed to c<strong>on</strong>sider the two-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al surface of<br />

the sphere itself as the third dimensi<strong>on</strong> was just a crutch to let us visualize<br />

the curved two-dimensi<strong>on</strong>al surface. So this questi<strong>on</strong> is really ‘what point<br />

<strong>on</strong> the sphere is equidistant from all points <strong>on</strong> the equator?’ In fact, there<br />

are two answers: the north pole <strong>and</strong> the south pole. Either may be called<br />

the center of the sphere.<br />

Now, how does the distance around the equator compare to the distance<br />

(measured al<strong>on</strong>g the sphere) from the north pole to the equator? The arc<br />

running from the north pole to the equator goes 1/4 of the way around<br />

the sphere. This is the radius of the equator in the relevant sense. Of<br />

course, the equator goes <strong>on</strong>ce around the sphere. Thus, its circumference<br />

is exactly four times its radius.<br />

A ≠ πR 2 : The area of a circle is typically not π times the square of its radius.<br />

Again, the equator <strong>on</strong> the sphere makes a good example. With the radius

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!