Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7.6. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS 189<br />
of accelerati<strong>on</strong> is now relative as well – it is equivalent to being in a gravitati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
field.<br />
While this point is related to why the study of gravity historically acquired the<br />
name “General <strong>Relativity</strong>,” it is not clear that this is an especially useful way<br />
to think about things. In particular, I want to stress that <strong>on</strong>e can still measure<br />
<strong>on</strong>e’s proper accelerati<strong>on</strong> as the accelerati<strong>on</strong> relative to a nearby (i.e., local!)<br />
freely falling frame.<br />
⋆⋆ Thus, there is an absolute distincti<strong>on</strong> between freely falling <strong>and</strong> not freely<br />
falling. Whether you wish to identify these terms with n<strong>on</strong>-accelerating <strong>and</strong><br />
accelerating is just a questi<strong>on</strong> of semantics – though most modern relativists find<br />
it c<strong>on</strong>venient to do so. As a result, I will use a language in which accelerati<strong>on</strong> is<br />
not a relative c<strong>on</strong>cept but in which it implicitly means “accelerati<strong>on</strong> measured<br />
locally with respect to freely falling frames.”<br />
7.5.2 And what about the speed of light?<br />
There is a questi<strong>on</strong> that you probably wanted to ask a few paragraphs back,<br />
but then I went <strong>on</strong> to other things.... I said that in a general gravitati<strong>on</strong>al field<br />
there are no frames of reference in which light rays always travel in straight lines<br />
at c<strong>on</strong>stant speed. So, after all of our struggles, have we finally thrown out the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>stancy of the speed of light?<br />
No, not completely. There is <strong>on</strong>e very important statement left. Suppose that<br />
we measure the speed of light at some event (E) in a frame of reference that<br />
falls freely at event E. Then, near event E things in this frame work just like<br />
they do in inertial frames – so, light moves at speed c <strong>and</strong> in a straight line.<br />
Said in our new language:<br />
As measured locally in a freely falling frame, light always moves in straight<br />
lines at speed c.<br />
7.6 Homework Problems<br />
7-1. This first problem is an exercise in thinking about things from the perspective<br />
of a freely falling object. Remember that Newt<strong>on</strong>’s law of gravity<br />
tells us that (i) objects near the earth are attracted to the center of the<br />
earth <strong>and</strong> (ii) objects closer to the earth are attracted more str<strong>on</strong>gly than<br />
are objects farther away. You should include both of these effects<br />
as you work this problem.<br />
(a) Suppose that three small st<strong>on</strong>es are released from high above the<br />
earth as shown below. Sketch their worldlines <strong>on</strong> a spacetime diagram<br />
drawn in the reference frame of the middle st<strong>on</strong>e. Use the<br />
x directi<strong>on</strong> (shown below) for the spatial directi<strong>on</strong> of your diagram.<br />
(That is, sketch the moti<strong>on</strong> in the x, t plane.) [Hint: In the case<br />
shown below, the three st<strong>on</strong>es are nearly the same distance