27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.6. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS 189<br />

of accelerati<strong>on</strong> is now relative as well – it is equivalent to being in a gravitati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

field.<br />

While this point is related to why the study of gravity historically acquired the<br />

name “General <strong>Relativity</strong>,” it is not clear that this is an especially useful way<br />

to think about things. In particular, I want to stress that <strong>on</strong>e can still measure<br />

<strong>on</strong>e’s proper accelerati<strong>on</strong> as the accelerati<strong>on</strong> relative to a nearby (i.e., local!)<br />

freely falling frame.<br />

⋆⋆ Thus, there is an absolute distincti<strong>on</strong> between freely falling <strong>and</strong> not freely<br />

falling. Whether you wish to identify these terms with n<strong>on</strong>-accelerating <strong>and</strong><br />

accelerating is just a questi<strong>on</strong> of semantics – though most modern relativists find<br />

it c<strong>on</strong>venient to do so. As a result, I will use a language in which accelerati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

not a relative c<strong>on</strong>cept but in which it implicitly means “accelerati<strong>on</strong> measured<br />

locally with respect to freely falling frames.”<br />

7.5.2 And what about the speed of light?<br />

There is a questi<strong>on</strong> that you probably wanted to ask a few paragraphs back,<br />

but then I went <strong>on</strong> to other things.... I said that in a general gravitati<strong>on</strong>al field<br />

there are no frames of reference in which light rays always travel in straight lines<br />

at c<strong>on</strong>stant speed. So, after all of our struggles, have we finally thrown out the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stancy of the speed of light?<br />

No, not completely. There is <strong>on</strong>e very important statement left. Suppose that<br />

we measure the speed of light at some event (E) in a frame of reference that<br />

falls freely at event E. Then, near event E things in this frame work just like<br />

they do in inertial frames – so, light moves at speed c <strong>and</strong> in a straight line.<br />

Said in our new language:<br />

As measured locally in a freely falling frame, light always moves in straight<br />

lines at speed c.<br />

7.6 Homework Problems<br />

7-1. This first problem is an exercise in thinking about things from the perspective<br />

of a freely falling object. Remember that Newt<strong>on</strong>’s law of gravity<br />

tells us that (i) objects near the earth are attracted to the center of the<br />

earth <strong>and</strong> (ii) objects closer to the earth are attracted more str<strong>on</strong>gly than<br />

are objects farther away. You should include both of these effects<br />

as you work this problem.<br />

(a) Suppose that three small st<strong>on</strong>es are released from high above the<br />

earth as shown below. Sketch their worldlines <strong>on</strong> a spacetime diagram<br />

drawn in the reference frame of the middle st<strong>on</strong>e. Use the<br />

x directi<strong>on</strong> (shown below) for the spatial directi<strong>on</strong> of your diagram.<br />

(That is, sketch the moti<strong>on</strong> in the x, t plane.) [Hint: In the case<br />

shown below, the three st<strong>on</strong>es are nearly the same distance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!