Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
168 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD c) Gravity. d) Friction. e) One object pushing another. f) Pressure. and so on..... Now, the first two of these forces are described by Maxwell’s equations. As we have discussed, Maxwell’s equations fit well with (and even led to!) relativity. Unlike Newton’s laws, Maxwell’s equations are fully compatible with relativity and require no modifications at all. Thus, we may set these forces aside as ‘complete’ and move on to the others. Let’s skip ahead to the last three forces. These all have to do in the end with atoms pushing and pulling on each other. In Einstein’s time, such things we believed 1 to be governed by the electric forces between atoms. So, it was thought that this was also properly described by Maxwell’s equations and would fit well with relativity. You may have noticed that this leaves one force (gravity) as the odd one out. Einstein wondered: how hard can it be to make gravity consistent with relativity? 7.1 The Gravitational Field Let’s begin by revisiting the pre-relativistic understanding of gravity. Perhaps we will get lucky and find that it too requires no modification. 7.1.1 Newtonian Gravity vs. relativity Newton’s understanding of gravity was as follows: Newton’s Universal Law of Gravity Any two objects of masses m 1 and m 2 exert ‘gravitational’ forces on each other of magnitude d F = G m 1m 2 d 2 , (7.1) F 1 F 2 1 This belief is basically false. A large part of such ‘forces’ comes from an effect that is not in fact described as a ‘force’ today. This effect is known as the ‘Pauli exclusion principle’ and states that no two electrons can occupy the same ‘quantum state’ (basically, that they cannot be stacked on top of each other). Today, we recognize this effect as coming from the fundamental quantum nature of the electron. (Protons and other ‘fermions’ behave similarly, while photons and other ‘bosons’ do not.) Quantum mechanics is another kettle of fish altogether, but in the end it does fit well with special relativity.
7.1. THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD 169 directed toward each other, where G = 6.67 × 10 −11 Nm 2 /kg 2 is called “Newton’s Gravitational Constant.” G is a kind of intrinsic measure of how strong the gravitational force is. It turns out that this rule is not compatible with special relativity. In particular, having learned relativity we now believe that it should not be possible to send messages faster than the speed of light. However, Newton’s rule above would allow us to do so using gravity. The point is that Newton said that the force depends on the separation between the objects at this instant 2 . Example: The earth is about eight light-minutes from the sun. This means that, at the speed of light, a message would take eight minutes to travel from the sun to the earth. However, suppose that, unbeknownst to us, some aliens are about to move the sun. Then, based on our understanding of relativity, we would expect it to take eight minutes for us to find out! But Newton would have expected us to find out instantly because the force on the earth would shift (changing the tides and other things.....) Force before Force after 7.1.2 The importance of the field Now, it is important to understand how Maxwell’s equations get around this sort of problem. That is to say, what if the Sun were a positive electric charge, the earth were a big negative electric charge, and they were held together by an Electro-Magnetic field? We said that Maxwell’s equations are consistent with relativity – so how what would they tell us happens when the aliens move the sun? The point is that the positive charge does not act directly on the negative charge. Instead, the positive charge sets up an electric field which tells the negative charge how to move. + - When the positive charge is moved, the electric field around it must change, but it turns out that the field does not change everywhere at the same time. 2 Note that there is also an issue of simultaneity here. Which events on the two separated worldlines should one compare to compute the distance? Which notion of ‘this instant’ would one use to pick out these events?
- Page 118 and 119: 118 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 120 and 121: 120 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 122 and 123: 122 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 124 and 125: 124 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 126 and 127: 126 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 128 and 129: 128 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 130 and 131: 130 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 132 and 133: 132 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 134 and 135: 134 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 136 and 137: 136 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 138 and 139: 138 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 140 and 141: 140 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 142 and 143: 142 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 144 and 145: 144 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 146 and 147: 146 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 148 and 149: 148 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 150 and 151: 150 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 152 and 153: 152 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 154 and 155: 154 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 156 and 157: 156 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 158 and 159: 158 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 160 and 161: 160 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 162 and 163: 162 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 164 and 165: 164 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 166 and 167: 166 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 170 and 171: 170 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 172 and 173: 172 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 174 and 175: 174 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 176 and 177: 176 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 178 and 179: 178 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 180 and 181: 180 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 182 and 183: 182 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 184 and 185: 184 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 186 and 187: 186 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 188 and 189: 188 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 190 and 191: 190 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 192 and 193: 192 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 194 and 195: 194 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 196 and 197: 196 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 198 and 199: 198 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 200 and 201: 200 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 202 and 203: 202 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 204 and 205: 204 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 206 and 207: 206 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 208 and 209: 208 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 210 and 211: 210 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 212 and 213: 212 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 214 and 215: 214 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
- Page 216 and 217: 216 CHAPTER 8. GENERAL RELATIVITY A
7.1. THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD 169<br />
directed toward each other, where G = 6.67 × 10 −11 Nm 2 /kg 2 is called<br />
“Newt<strong>on</strong>’s Gravitati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>stant.” G is a kind of intrinsic measure of<br />
how str<strong>on</strong>g the gravitati<strong>on</strong>al force is.<br />
It turns out that this rule is not compatible with special relativity. In particular,<br />
having learned relativity we now believe that it should not be possible to send<br />
messages faster than the speed of light. However, Newt<strong>on</strong>’s rule above would<br />
allow us to do so using gravity. The point is that Newt<strong>on</strong> said that the force<br />
depends <strong>on</strong> the separati<strong>on</strong> between the objects at this instant 2 .<br />
Example: The earth is about eight light-minutes from the sun. This means that,<br />
at the speed of light, a message would take eight minutes to travel from the sun<br />
to the earth. However, suppose that, unbeknownst to us, some aliens are about<br />
to move the sun.<br />
Then, based <strong>on</strong> our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of relativity, we would expect it to take eight<br />
minutes for us to find out! But Newt<strong>on</strong> would have expected us to find out<br />
instantly because the force <strong>on</strong> the earth would shift (changing the tides <strong>and</strong><br />
other things.....)<br />
Force before<br />
Force after<br />
7.1.2 The importance of the field<br />
Now, it is important to underst<strong>and</strong> how Maxwell’s equati<strong>on</strong>s get around this<br />
sort of problem. That is to say, what if the Sun were a positive electric charge,<br />
the earth were a big negative electric charge, <strong>and</strong> they were held together by an<br />
Electro-Magnetic field? We said that Maxwell’s equati<strong>on</strong>s are c<strong>on</strong>sistent with<br />
relativity – so how what would they tell us happens when the aliens move the<br />
sun?<br />
The point is that the positive charge does not act directly <strong>on</strong> the negative charge.<br />
Instead, the positive charge sets up an electric field which tells the negative<br />
charge how to move.<br />
+ -<br />
When the positive charge is moved, the electric field around it must change,<br />
but it turns out that the field does not change everywhere at the same time.<br />
2 Note that there is also an issue of simultaneity here. Which events <strong>on</strong> the two separated<br />
worldlines should <strong>on</strong>e compare to compute the distance? Which noti<strong>on</strong> of ‘this instant’ would<br />
<strong>on</strong>e use to pick out these events?