27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND ...<br />

The third law of Newt<strong>on</strong>ian <strong>Physics</strong>: When two objects (A <strong>and</strong> B) exert<br />

forces F A <strong>on</strong> B <strong>and</strong> F B <strong>on</strong> A <strong>on</strong> each other, these forces have the same size but<br />

act in opposite directi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

To underst<strong>and</strong> why this is a problem, let’s think about the gravitati<strong>on</strong>al forces<br />

between the Sun <strong>and</strong> the Earth.<br />

Sun<br />

Earth<br />

Recall that Newt<strong>on</strong> said that the force between the earth <strong>and</strong> the sun is given<br />

by an inverse square law: F = GM earthM sun<br />

d<br />

where d is the distance between<br />

2<br />

them. In particular, the force between the earth <strong>and</strong> sun decreases if they move<br />

farther apart. Let’s draw a spacetime diagram showing the two objects moving<br />

apart.<br />

F 2<br />

F2<br />

t 2<br />

F<br />

1<br />

F 1<br />

t 1<br />

At some time t 1 when they are close together, there is some str<strong>on</strong>g force F 1<br />

acting <strong>on</strong> each object. Then, later, when they are farther apart, there is some<br />

weaker force F 2 acting <strong>on</strong> each object.<br />

However, what happens if we c<strong>on</strong>sider this diagram in a moving reference frame?<br />

I have drawn in a line of simultaneity (the dashed line) for a different reference<br />

frame above, <strong>and</strong> we can see that it passes through <strong>on</strong>e point marked F 1 <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>e<br />

point marked F 2 ! This shows that Newt<strong>on</strong>’s third law as stated above cannot<br />

possibly hold 1 in all reference frames.<br />

So, Newt<strong>on</strong>’s third law has to go. But of course, Newt<strong>on</strong>’s third law is not<br />

completely wr<strong>on</strong>g – it worked very well for several hundred years! So, as<br />

with the law of compositi<strong>on</strong> of velocities <strong>and</strong> Newt<strong>on</strong>’s sec<strong>on</strong>d law, we may<br />

expect that it is an approximati<strong>on</strong> to some other (more correct) law, with this<br />

approximati<strong>on</strong> being valid <strong>on</strong>ly for velocities that are very small compared to c.<br />

It turns out that this was not such a shock to Einstein, as there had been a bit<br />

of trouble with Newt<strong>on</strong>’s third law even before relativity itself was understood.<br />

Again, the culprit was electromagnetism.<br />

1 You might w<strong>on</strong>der if you could somehow save the third law by having the c<strong>on</strong>cept of force<br />

depend <strong>on</strong> which inertial frame you use to describe the system. Then in the moving frame, the<br />

forces would not be F 1 <strong>and</strong> F 2 . However, the forces in the moving frame must still somehow<br />

be determined by F 1 <strong>and</strong> F 2 . Thus, if F 1 <strong>and</strong> F 2 do not agree, neither can the forces in the<br />

moving frame.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!