27.09.2014 Views

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6<br />

Dynamics: Energy <strong>and</strong><br />

Momentum in <strong>Relativity</strong><br />

Read Einstein, ch. 15<br />

Up until now, we have been c<strong>on</strong>cerned mostly with describing moti<strong>on</strong>. We have<br />

asked how various situati<strong>on</strong>s appear in different reference frames, both inertial<br />

<strong>and</strong> accelerated. However, we have largely ignored the questi<strong>on</strong> of what would<br />

make an object follow a given worldline (‘dynamics’). The <strong>on</strong>e excepti<strong>on</strong> was<br />

when we studied the uniformly accelerated rocket <strong>and</strong> realized that it must burn<br />

equal amounts of fuel in equal amounts of proper time. This realizati<strong>on</strong> came<br />

through using Newt<strong>on</strong>’s sec<strong>on</strong>d law in the regime where we expect it to hold<br />

true: in the limit in which v/c is vanishingly small.<br />

6.1 Dynamics, or, “Whatever happened to Forces?”<br />

Recall that Newt<strong>on</strong>’s various laws used the old c<strong>on</strong>cepts of space <strong>and</strong> time. As a<br />

result, before we can apply them to situati<strong>on</strong>s with finite relative velocity, they<br />

will have to be at least rewritten <strong>and</strong> perhaps greatly modified to accommodate<br />

our new underst<strong>and</strong>ing of relativity. This was also true for our uniformly accelerating<br />

rocket. A c<strong>on</strong>stant thrust does not provide a c<strong>on</strong>stant accelerati<strong>on</strong><br />

as measured from a fixed inertial reference frame but, instead, it produces a<br />

c<strong>on</strong>stant proper accelerati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Now, a central feature of Newt<strong>on</strong>’s laws (of much of pre-Einstein physics) was<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>cept of force. It turns out that the c<strong>on</strong>cept of force is not as useful in<br />

relativistic physics. This has something to do with our discovery that accelerati<strong>on</strong><br />

is now a frame-dependent c<strong>on</strong>cept (so that a statement like F = ma would<br />

be more complicated), but the main point actually involves Newt<strong>on</strong>’s third law:<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!