Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB Notes on Relativity and Cosmology - Physics Department, UCSB
130 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFERENCE FRAMES . . . Z A In the new frame of reference, the rocket is at rest at event A. Therefore, the rocket’s line of simultaneity through A is a horizontal line. Note that this line passes through event Z. This makes the line of simultaneity easy to draw on the original diagram. What we have just seen is that: Given a uniformly accelerating observer, there is an event Z from which it maintains proper distance. The observer’s line of simultaneity through any event A on her worldline is the line that connects event A to event Z. Thus, the diagram below shows the rocket’s lines of simultaneity. Z 1 0 -1 2 -2 Let me quickly make one comment here on the passage of time. Suppose that events −2, −1 above are separated by the same sized boost as events −1, 0, events 0, 1, and events 1, 2. From the relation θ = ατ/c 2 it follows that each such pair of events is also separated by the same interval of proper time along the worldline. ⋆⋆ But now on to the more interesting features of the diagram above! Note that the acceleration horizons divide the spacetime into four regions. In the rightmost region, the lines of simultaneity look more or less normal. However, in the top and bottom regions, there are no lines of simultaneity at all! The rocket’s lines of simultaneity simply do not penetrate into these regions. Finally, in the left-most region things again look more or less normal except that the labels on the lines of simultaneity seem to go the wrong way, ‘moving backward in time.’
5.2. THE UNIFORMLY ACCELERATED FRAME 131 And, of course, all of the lines of simultaneity pass through event Z where the horizons cross. These strange-sounding features of the diagram should remind you of the weird effects we found associated with Gaston’s acceleration in our discussion of the twin paradox in section 4.2. As with Gaston, one is tempted to ask “How can the rocket see things running backward in time in the left-most region?” In fact, the rocket does not see, or even know about, anything in this region. As we mentioned above, no signal of any kind from any event in this region can ever catch up to the rocket. As a result, this phenomenon of finding things to run backwards in time is a pure mathematical artifact and is not directly related to anything that observers on the rocket actually notice. 5.2.2 Friends on a Rope In the last section we uncovered some odd effects associated with the the acceleration horizons. In particular, we found that there was a region in which the lines of simultaneity seemed to run backward. However, we also found that the rocket could neither signal this region nor receive a signal from it. As a result, the fact that the lines of simultaneity run backward here is purely a mathematical artifact. Despite our discussion above, you might wonder if that funny part of the rocket’s reference frame might somehow still be meaningful. It turns out to be productive to get another perspective on this, so let’s think a bit about how we might actually construct a reference frame for the rocket. Suppose, for example, that I sit in the nose (the front) of the rocket. I would probably like to use our usual trick of asking some of my friends (or the students in class) to sit at a constant distance from me in either direction. I would then try to have them observe nearby events and tell me which ones happen where. We would like to know what happens to the ones that lie below the horizon. Let us begin by asking the question: what worldlines do these fellow observers follow? Let’s see.... Consider a friend who remains a constant distance ∆ below us as measured by us; that is, as measured in the momentarily co-moving frame of reference. This means that this distance is measured along our line of simultaneity. But look at what this means on the diagram below:
- Page 80 and 81: 80 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 82 and 83: 82 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 84 and 85: 84 CHAPTER 3. EINSTEIN AND INERTIAL
- Page 86 and 87: 86 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 88 and 89: 88 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 90 and 91: 90 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 92 and 93: 92 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 94 and 95: 94 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 96 and 97: 96 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 98 and 99: 98 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 100 and 101: 100 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 102 and 103: 102 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 104 and 105: 104 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 106 and 107: 106 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 108 and 109: 108 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 110 and 111: 110 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 112 and 113: 112 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 114 and 115: 114 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 116 and 117: 116 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 118 and 119: 118 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 120 and 121: 120 CHAPTER 4. MINKOWSKIAN GEOMETRY
- Page 122 and 123: 122 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 124 and 125: 124 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 126 and 127: 126 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 128 and 129: 128 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 132 and 133: 132 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 134 and 135: 134 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 136 and 137: 136 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 138 and 139: 138 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 140 and 141: 140 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 142 and 143: 142 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFEREN
- Page 144 and 145: 144 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 146 and 147: 146 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 148 and 149: 148 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 150 and 151: 150 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 152 and 153: 152 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 154 and 155: 154 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 156 and 157: 156 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 158 and 159: 158 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 160 and 161: 160 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 162 and 163: 162 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 164 and 165: 164 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 166 and 167: 166 CHAPTER 6. DYNAMICS: ENERGY AND
- Page 168 and 169: 168 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 170 and 171: 170 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 172 and 173: 172 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 174 and 175: 174 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 176 and 177: 176 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
- Page 178 and 179: 178 CHAPTER 7. RELATIVITY AND THE G
130 CHAPTER 5. ACCELERATING REFERENCE FRAMES . . .<br />
Z<br />
A<br />
In the new frame of reference, the rocket is at rest at event A. Therefore, the<br />
rocket’s line of simultaneity through A is a horiz<strong>on</strong>tal line. Note that this line<br />
passes through event Z.<br />
This makes the line of simultaneity easy to draw <strong>on</strong> the original diagram. What<br />
we have just seen is that:<br />
Given a uniformly accelerating observer, there is an event Z from which<br />
it maintains proper distance. The observer’s line of simultaneity through any<br />
event A <strong>on</strong> her worldline is the line that c<strong>on</strong>nects event A to event Z.<br />
Thus, the diagram below shows the rocket’s lines of simultaneity.<br />
Z<br />
1<br />
0<br />
-1<br />
2<br />
-2<br />
Let me quickly make <strong>on</strong>e comment here <strong>on</strong> the passage of time. Suppose that<br />
events −2, −1 above are separated by the same sized boost as events −1, 0,<br />
events 0, 1, <strong>and</strong> events 1, 2. From the relati<strong>on</strong> θ = ατ/c 2 it follows that each<br />
such pair of events is also separated by the same interval of proper time al<strong>on</strong>g<br />
the worldline.<br />
⋆⋆ But now <strong>on</strong> to the more interesting features of the diagram above! Note that<br />
the accelerati<strong>on</strong> horiz<strong>on</strong>s divide the spacetime into four regi<strong>on</strong>s. In the rightmost<br />
regi<strong>on</strong>, the lines of simultaneity look more or less normal. However, in the<br />
top <strong>and</strong> bottom regi<strong>on</strong>s, there are no lines of simultaneity at all! The rocket’s<br />
lines of simultaneity simply do not penetrate into these regi<strong>on</strong>s. Finally, in the<br />
left-most regi<strong>on</strong> things again look more or less normal except that the labels <strong>on</strong><br />
the lines of simultaneity seem to go the wr<strong>on</strong>g way, ‘moving backward in time.’