Full Version - Essential Energy
Full Version - Essential Energy
Full Version - Essential Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Judicial decisions<br />
• Application by East Australian Pipeline Limited<br />
[2005] ACompT. The Australian Competition Tribunal<br />
considered an application by East Australian Pipeline<br />
Limited under section 39(1) of the Gas Pipeline<br />
Access (South Australia) Act 1997 (‘the Gas Pipeline<br />
Act’). The application was for review of an ACCC<br />
decision concerning the method of depreciating<br />
optimised replacement cost to arrive at depreciated<br />
optimised, which the applicant argued was prohibited<br />
by section 39(5) of the Gas Pipeline Act.<br />
62<br />
• Western Power Corporation v Koenig [2004] WASCA<br />
119. The Western Australian Supreme Court (‘WA SC’)<br />
considered the application of Regulation 63(1) of the<br />
Electrical (Licensing) Regulations 1991. In particular,<br />
the WA Supreme Court considered the reporting<br />
obligations on Western Power Corporation following<br />
an incident on a river, where a derrick attached to a<br />
barge was struck by an overhead powerline.<br />
COUNTRY ENERGY ANNUAL REPORT 2004–2005